Friday, August 21, 2026

 

Paleontologists spent 20 years carbon-dating thousands of marine fossils, then used them to decode a process fundamental to Earth’s history




Florida Museum of Natural History
Image 1 

image: 

Scientists carbon-dated more than 7,500 marine fossils from ocean beds around the world and used that data to determine which environmental factors are most responsible for mixing together fossils from different time periods in the same stratum.

view more 

Credit: Florida Museum photo by Kristen Grace






Paleontologists spent 20 years carbon-dating thousands of marine fossils, then used them to decode a process fundamental to Earth’s history

Key points

  • Over the course of 20 years, an international team of scientists collected and carbon-dated more than 7,500 marine fossils from ocean beds around the world.
  • Scientists used the dataset to determine which of several environmental factors contributes most to time averaging, a phenomenon in which organisms that lived in different time periods are mixed and preserved together in the same fossil bed.
  • The results indicate that sedimentation is more important than other factors, such as the number of burrowing animals in a given area or the durability of fossils.
  • The study, published in the journal PNAS, establishes guidelines regarding the types of research questions paleontologists can investigate using fossil samples.

GAINESVILLE, Fla. --- In productive marine environments, a square meter of seafloor can be perforated by hundreds to thousands of isolated and interconnected tunnels through which crawl and writhe a cornucopia of clams, shrimp, sea stars, sand dollars, snails, worms and other animals. All that excavation mixes up the sediment, along with any shells and other skeletal remains that happen to be there. This temporal smearing is a problem for paleontologists, because when that piece of seafloor is buried and becomes part of the fossil record, it’s difficult and expensive to figure out how much mixing took place.

“What continually amazes me is just how much time a bunch of fossils collected from a single sediment layer can represent. In some cases, well-preserved fossil organisms that are found next to each other might have lived hundreds or thousands of years apart,” wrote Rafal Nawrot, a paleontologist at the University of Vienna.

The mixing of fossils that lived at different times but are preserved together is called time averaging.

According to Daniele Scarponi, a colleague of Nawrot’s and an associate professor at the University of Bologna, time averaging dictates the types of questions paleontologists can ask.

“Before interpreting a fossil assemblage, we need to know the interval it represents. Some fossil assemblages are like the ruins of Pompeii — buried rapidly and thus providing a snapshot of past communities frozen in time. Others are more akin to a prehistoric graveyard used continuously over centuries, in which human remains from different generations are slowly accumulating over time. Both types can provide valuable insights into the past, but the kinds of data we can extract from them will be different in each case,” Scarponi wrote.

In addition to burrowing animals, several other factors influence time averaging, including:

  1. The durability of organic material is important. Most organisms decompose or get picked apart by scavengers before they become fossilized. For this reason, both the marine and terrestrial fossil records are primarily composed of hard skeletal material, like shells and bones. But even these break and disintegrate if they aren’t preserved quickly enough.
  2. Another important factor is the rate of sedimentation, which occurs unevenly in different parts of the ocean and changes through time. Deltas, for example, have high rates of sedimentation, whereas other areas might only receive a fine dusting over long periods of time. If sedimentation is slow, skeletal remains of organisms accumulate over long periods of time, but if sedimentation is fast, the remains are buried quicker, and age mixing is reduced.
  3. Biological productivity is also crucial. The number of fossils paleontologists can expect to find while digging in one spot is strongly correlated with the number of organisms that were previously around to be fossilized in the first place.

Through a project that was 20 years in the making, members of an international consortium of scientists say they have determined which of these factors is the most important for time averaging and thus primarily controls the temporal resolution of paleontological data.

“Our results demonstrate that if we know how quickly sediment accumulates — which can be deduced from the environmental context — we can determine how much time is captured by a given fossil assemblage: The faster individual shells or bones are buried below the sediment surface, the less likely it is that remains from multiple generations of organisms will accumulate and be preserved together,” Nawrot wrote.

Sedimentation rates have long been anticipated to be an important component of time averaging, but gathering data needed to rigorously and comprehensively assess this issue is difficult, time-consuming and very expensive.

By integrating multiple projects, the authors analyzed more than 7,500 fossils, which were dated using radiocarbon and other methods and collected from a variety of oceanic environments around the world, from shallow coastal settings to the edges of continental shelves.

The various research groups involved in the project — which includes scientists based in Australia, Austria, the Bahamas, Brazil, Italy, Germany, Slovakia and the United States — separately collected, studied and published papers on the fossils over a period of two decades. When they learned of each other’s work, they decided to join forces and share data.

“Nothing of this scale has ever been attempted before because it’s simply not feasible to do so, but thanks to the fact that we had a whole bunch of teams that worked on similar topics and used similar methods, we were able to compile it,” said the study’s co-lead author, Michal Kowalewski, the Thompson chair of invertebrate paleontology at the Florida Museum of Natural History.

Radiometric dating, one of the primary methods the authors used, takes advantage of the fact that radioactive atoms always decay into more stable, non-radioactive atoms at a steady, predictable rate. This allows scientists to estimate the age of minerals and fossils.

Many animals have skeletons that contain a type of radioactive isotope called carbon-14. Plants absorb carbon-14 during photosynthesis and use it to make more of themselves. Herbivores get carbon-14 secondhand by eating plants, carnivores get it from herbivores, and decomposers get it from all of the above. This list includes humans. Any part of your body that contains carbon — which is every part of your body — is radioactive. Fortunately, carbon-14 emits radiation in the form of electrons, which for us is kind of like receiving a constant but imperceptibly low-level electric shock — not at all like the cell-shredding gamma rays emitted by uranium.

Carbon-14 has a half-life – the amount of time it takes for half of any given number of radioactive atoms to decay — of around 5,730 years. That meant the authors were restricted to the most recent fossil record, up to 55,000 years old, which is about the cutoff when any remaining carbon-14 in a fossil can be reliably measured.

The researchers also used a technique known as amino-acid racemization, which uses ratios of amino acids. As in the case of carbon isotopes, the ratio of different forms of a given amino acid also changes through time in a predictable way.

The reason no one has attempted dating on such a grand scale before is primarily due to the high cost of radiocarbon and amino-acid dating. Most research groups can afford to obtain data for only a few dozen specimens, but thousands of specimens are needed to fully evaluate the scale and drivers of time averaging. Distributing the cost across multiple labs over two decades helped significantly reduce this barrier, as did recent technological advances in radiometric dating that lowered the cost and made it possible to use much smaller samples than was previously possible.

Through this unique collaboration, Kowalewski and his colleagues have what is possibly the largest collection of fossil carbon dates ever compiled, which can now be used on a variety of research topics that would have been intractable otherwise.

“The dataset is incredibly powerful. We’re now working on multiple follow-up projects that explore various aspects of time averaging and related processes. You can use it to answer a lot of questions, but of course, we started with the big one,” he said.

After compiling the carbon dates from their fossil specimens, the authors simulated age distributions by varying the rates of bioturbation (mixing caused by burrowing animals), sedimentation and fossil destruction. Then they compared the real age distribution of carbon-dated fossils with the different simulated distributions to see which of the models most closely matched the actual patterns observed in the data.

The results were unambiguous.

“Sometimes life turns out to be more exciting than you thought,” Kowalewski said. “In this case, the outcome is beyond any dreams we may have had when we started.”

Knowing that the rate of sedimentation is the single most important factor in determining the extent to which fossils of different ages become mixed will unlock research avenues that were previously restricted. And assuming the same pattern holds true for oceans further back in time, the results can be extended to fossils that are much older than the ones that still contain residual amounts of carbon-14.

The authors published their results in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Additional co-authors of the study are: Adam Tomašových of the Slovak Academy of Sciences; Martin Zuschin, Bettina Bachmann, Michaela Berensmeier and Jan Steger of the University of Vienna; Paolo Albano of the Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn; Quan Hua of the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation; Darrell Kaufman of Northern Arizona University; Susan Kidwell of the University of Chicago; Matias Ritter of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Marcello Simões of the Universidade Estadual Paulista; Luis Torres Jr. of the Florida Museum of Natural History; Lukas Schweigl of the University of Bologna; Troy Dexter of the University of The Bahamas; Ivo Gallmetzer of the Natural History Museum Vienna; Claudio Pellegrini of the National Research Council of Italy; and Matthew Kosnik of Macquarie University.

 

Resurgence of malaria in Ethiopia



JAMA



About the Study: 

This study examines whether emerging drug and diagnostic resistance variants are contributing to Ethiopia’s malaria resurgence.



Corresponding Authors: Ashenafi Assefa Bahita, PhD, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Arbegnoch Street, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (ashyaega@yahoo.com); Jonathan B. Parr, MD, MPH, 130 Mason Farm Rd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 (jonathan_parr@med.unc.edu).

10.1001/jama.2026.14688

To access the embargoed study: Visit our JAMA Network Media Center at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

Link to the article in your story
We encourage you to link out to this article in your story using the link below. It includes an access token that will give free access to the article for your readers up to one year after publication. (The link will be live after the article publishes and embargo is lifted.)

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2026.14688?guestAccessKey=54bdfb84-5bf3-4527-9314-bc301f92dc93&utm_source=for_the_media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_term=082026

Editor's Note: Please see the article for additional information, including full author list, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

 

China’s solar expansion policy reduces bird diversity



Summary author: Walter Beckwith


American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)






The global push for solar energy could come with a hidden biodiversity cost, a study of more than 2,300 Chinese counties reports. According to the findings, stronger policies promoting solar development were associated with a decline in bird diversity, largely because ecologically diverse croplands and grasslands were converted to developed land. The expansion of renewable energy can help combat climate change, but large-scale solar development may create a new environmental trade-off by converting or fragmenting habitat and contributing to biodiversity loss. Because birds are relatively well monitored across large areas and respond sensitively to changes in vegetation, breeding habitat, and food availability, shifts in their diversity can reveal ecological impacts that conventional measures may overlook. In China, where rapidly growing solar capacity is expected to become a major component of the energy system, photovoltaic installations already cover thousands of square kilometers; they may increasingly affect bird populations and their habitats. Moreover, China’s solar power infrastructure has been strongly shaped by government policies, which have largely determined its location and scale.

 

Here, Huiming Zhang and colleagues investigated the ecological consequences of solar expansion. Zhang et al. assembled a large dataset covering 2,344 counties across China from 2014 to 2023. Their dataset combined bird observations, solar-energy policies, environmental conditions, and socioeconomic information. This allowed the authors to assess the relationship between solar-promoting policies and local bird diversity. They also looked at impacts of changes in land use, vegetation, and agricultural productivity. The findings revealed that stronger policies promoting solar expansion were associated with significant declines in bird diversity – a one-standard-deviation increase in policy intensity corresponded to a 2.10% reduction in the bird biodiversity index. These effects were strongest in wealthier and non-desert regions and disproportionately affected geographically widespread species. This was largely due to rapid land conversion, particularly the transformation of cropland and grassland into developed areas, which reduced vegetation diversity. Zhang et al. also identified a paradoxical pattern they call “inferior greening,” in which landscapes appeared greener based on higher Leaf Area Index but became ecologically poorer overall. “The next step is to move from biodiversity measurement to valuation by linking changes in bird diversity to ecosystem services and conservation values,” writes Yuanning Liang in a related Perspective. “Without such valuation, policy analysis gives insufficient weight to conservation, and benefit-cost analysis can understate the social cost of development. Just as climate policy requires credible estimates of climate damages to inform the social cost of carbon, credible estimates of biodiversity values are needed when sustainable development policies alter ecosystems.”

 

For reporters interested in topics on research integrity, co-author Kai Wu notes; “In our field, scientific integrity increasingly depends on transparent data practices, reproducible analytical frameworks, and responsible integration of interdisciplinary methods. As research increasingly connects climate change mitigation and adaptation, modern energy systems, and ecological processes with socioeconomic systems, developing shared standards for data validation and model transparency will be essential to ensure that scientific evidence can reliably inform global sustainability policies.”

 

How can EU battery regulations help improve global sustainability governance in other sectors?



International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis






Batteries are an essential part of our everyday lives. They are also central to the Green Transition, powering everything from electronic devices and electric vehicles to renewable energy storage. However, producing batteries has significant environmental impacts. Mining and processing raw materials, manufacturing, transportation, and recycling all contribute to a battery’s carbon footprint. In addition, battery supply chains are highly globalized, but the rules governing their environmental assessment are often developed at national or regional levels, making their footprint difficult to measure, report, and verify.

In a new paper titled “A Brussels Effect for Battery Sustainability,” researchers examine how the European Union’s Batteries Regulation could change this. As part of the study, IIASA scientists collaborated with researchers from the Leiden University in the Netherlands, Nanjing University in China, and ecoinvent in Switzerland.

The paper highlights that Europe currently plays a relatively limited role in several upstream stages of battery production. However, Europe remains heavily dependent on imports across many stages of the supply chain. This creates a fundamental challenge: batteries placed on the European market depend on raw materials, electricity, and manufacturing processes located in countries or regions with different reporting requirements.

Researchers explain that the EU Batteries Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 represents an important shift toward life-cycle-based sustainability governance. The paper also explores in detail the draft Delegated Act (DA) establishing the calculation and verification of the carbon footprint for electric vehicle batteries, the most technically developed DA supplementing the Regulation.

“The EU is in the process of formulating policy to ensure that the electric vehicle and large stationary batteries used in the EU are produced with low greenhouse gas emissions,” says Edgar Hertwich, study coauthor and Principal Research Scholar in the IIASA Energy, Climate, and Environment Program. “Battery production requires a lot of materials and energy, and the emissions during production can be substantial if coal is used. Raw materials and components for batteries come from outside the EU, and so do most batteries. The proposed EU battery regulations require that importers document the emissions following a set of rules for evidence collection that the EU has defined.”

The paper shows that there are clear advantages to this approach. Standardized data and calculation methods can make environmental performance more comparable and potentially improve transparency across the market. However, the authors also highlight a potential trade-off between consistency and representativeness. For example, geographically specific and potentially more accurate data may be excluded if it does not meet the required compliance framework. The authors therefore argue for a more a rigorous yet representative approach, enabling the use of alternative data or modeling methods that demonstrate comparable accuracy and integrity.

“The challenge is not rigor versus representativeness,” says Ranran Wang, study coauthor and professor at Nanjing University. “We need a system that is rigorous enough to support credible sustainability claims, but also able to work with evidence generated across very different production contexts.”

Beyond Europe, beyond batteries

In the paper, researchers also point to a broader phenomenon: the Brussels Effect. Traditionally, the term describes how EU regulations can influence practices outside Europe because companies around the world choose to follow European rules to maintain access to the EU market. Classic examples of the Brussels Effect include the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which have demonstrated how EU regulations can become global reference points.

This could have implications beyond batteries. The battery passport is described in the paper as an early test case for a wider digital product passport system, with potential applications in other sectors, such as textiles and electronics.

“Overall, the rules could be a model for other products as well. Emissions along supply chains are a significant problem for all jurisdictions seeking to address greenhouse gas emissions from industry,” explains Hertwich. “The EU battery regulation could hence be a model for adoption for other products, such as EVs and AI models, and thus help other regions deal with the same problems. We welcome the policy and see it as a significant development that can make an important contribution to climate change mitigation. On the other hand, the system as proposed is EU-centric and has received too little input from other regions. Such a system would have more chance to yield actual emission reductions, and to be adopted by other regions, if the rules were co-designed with producing regions.”
 

Reference:

Liang, Y., Hertwich, E., Istrate, R., Valente, A., Wang, R., (2026). A Brussels Effect for Battery Sustainability. Science. DOI10.1126/science.aed8133.

 

Subtle white light changes make indoor rooms feel cooler or warmer



Slightly changing the wavelength of light may influence how people feel indoors without changing the temperature, new research suggests





Penn State

white light can impact how people experience indoor temperatures 

image: 

A new study led by scientists at Penn State found that white light can impact how people experience indoor temperatures. Although the wavelength differences are invisible to the human eyes, they can influence the gap between perceived and real temperature by as much as 1.3 degrees Fahrenheit (F). 

view more 

Credit: Courtesy of Julian Wang / Penn State






UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. — Feeling too warm or too cold indoors may depend on more than the thermostat. The spectrum of indoor lighting plays a role in how people perceive temperature, according to research led by scientists at Penn State.

In a study, available in the August issue of the journal Energy and Buildings, researchers found that controlling red and blue wavelengths — two of the bandwidths of electromagnetic radiation that flow through space and are perceived by humans as light — of white light can impact how people experience indoor temperatures. Although the wavelength differences are invisible to the human eyes, they can influence the gap between perceived and real temperature by as much as 1.3 degrees Fahrenheit (F).

According to Julian Wang, professor of architectural engineering at Penn State and principal investigator of the study, if certain lighting conditions allow people to feel comfortable across a wider range of temperatures, that could help reduce heating and cooling demands and ultimately lead to energy savings.

‘‘We wanted to understand whether lighting can widen people's thermal comfort zone,” Wang said. “If it can, even a modest shift in perceived temperature can translate into substantial cumulative energy savings over time.’’

Previous studies have shown that colored lighting, such as blue and red light, can influence thermal perception, he said. However, colored lighting is impractical for everyday environments such as offices, classrooms, and homes because it can be visually distracting and create visual noise, making it difficult to perform routine tasks comfortably. Through this project, Wang's team found that the “color” doesn’t need to be visible to achieve the same effects — subtle differences hidden within ordinary white light can produce similar effects without changing the appearance of the lighting.

‘‘The novelty of this study is that we used white light that looks identical to the human eye but has a different spectral composition,’’ Wang said, explaining that their findings provide some of the first evidence that different white light spectra can influence how people perceive indoor temperatures. ‘‘That allowed us to evaluate whether the response was driven by thespectral composition of the light, rather than by people's perception of color.’’

To test this idea, the researchers recruited 10 participants, five women and five men, between the ages of 18 and 35. Participants occupied a simulated office cubicle inside a climate-controlled chamber at Penn State’s University Park campus while experiencing gradually increasing and decreasing air temperature cycles starting from an initial room temperature of approximately 76°F. During the separate experimental sessions, participants were exposed to two types of white light that looked identical but differed in their dominant wavelengths: one enriched in blue short-wave light and the other enriched in red long-wave light. Throughout the study, the researchers monitored participants' thermal sensation, comfort and behavioral responses.

The researchers found that when participants were exposed to blue-enriched white light in the controlled room, they felt cool enough to tolerate air temperatures about 1.3 F warmer. In contrast, red-enriched white light had the opposite effect, making participants feel warmer.

While the findings are promising, Wang said, this was an exploratory study. In the future, the team plans to expand the research to see whether the results are consistent when utilizing participants from a wider range of backgrounds and age groups. They said they also hope to investigate how lighting interacts with other environmental factors, such as sound, window views and visual patterns, to shape people's perception of indoor comfort.

‘‘The next step is to do research in a larger and more diverse population to determine whether these effects extend beyond young adults and could be applied globally,” Wang said.

Ultimately, he said his group plans to test the new lighting strategies under more extreme heat and cold conditions and evaluate how they could be incorporated into real-world buildings to improve comfort while reducing energy use.

‘‘This is just one of our starting points,’’ he said. ‘‘Our long-term goal is to expand people's multi-domain interactions, and if successful, this approach could improve comfort and human performance while reducing energy use in buildings, from homes and offices to space habitats.’’

This research was funded by the Institute of Energy and the Environment (IEE) Seed Grant at Penn State.

Study collaborators include Jeffrey Muninger and Chenshun Chen, postdoctoral scholars in architectural engineering from Penn State; Anne-Marie Chang, associate professor of biobehavioral health at Penn State; first author Nan Wang, a postdoctoral scholar in civil and environmental engineering at Northwestern University; and Yanxiao Feng from the New Jersey Institute of Technology.