A fresh corruption scandal broke out in Ukraine – this time, it was racketeering by relative junior members of the Zelenskiy administration. Corruption is not a problem of the system in Ukraine; corruption is the system.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s deputy head of staff, Iryna Mudra, has been arrested and found to have assets of just over $6mn and together with a dozen other high officials, connected to Bankova, to have been running mafia-like racketeering schemes. Before I go on, I should point out that the fact they have been caught, arrested and charged is something of a revolution in Ukraine, but nevertheless, it also highlights how fundamentally corrupt the government of Ukraine is.
Russia is famously corrupt, but I don’t think people realise just how much worse it is in Ukraine. When the war started, the foreign ministries called their embassies for advice and were warned by those that actually lived and worked in Kyiv to be very careful. There is a reason why Ukraine, which has significant resources – agricultural, metals, manufacturing, excellent human capital, etc, and is one of the biggest retail markets in Europe – has been the poorest or second poorest (after Moldova), country in Europe for all of the last three decades. Any money available gets stolen.
Superficially it looks much better than Russia as, unlike Russia, it has a vibrant civil society thanks to two coloured revolutions. And the elections are more or less real. But on the economic front Ukraine is still in the stone ages and even the heroes of Orange Revolution were rotten to the core (with the big exception of Viktor Yushchenko, who they tried to kill).
The way it works is Ukraine’s the lack of progress in setting up institutions and the dysfunctional courts drives corruption. Leaders give deputies lucrative posts that control cashflows and they are expected to help themselves. The hold of the leader becomes his ability to take that job away, which ensures loyalty. The weakness of the legal system and the irrelevance of elections allows deputies to steal with impunity and they are not accountable to public opinion.
Ex-Orange Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko was an early media star with her trademark hair braid and seen as a “firebrand” democratic leader. In Ukraine she is more widely known as the “gas princess” as she is believed to have stolen some $350mn while she was minister of gas. After the Euromaidan Revolution of Dignity was over and she was let out to jail, where President Viktor Yanukovych put her, the crowds were happy to see her released but had no interest in seeing her back in power. To highlight the point she has also recently been fingered by NABU in its latest vote buying investigations. She was caught on camera with huge bundles of dollars that she uses to get votes through the Rada.
Yanukovych is even more old school and stripped-mined the country while he was president. He is accused of nicking a third of the country’s hard currency reserves – some $35bn – that has never been recovered. His Mezhyhirya Residence is famously a palace where amongst the many trappings of wealth was a loaf of bread made out of solid gold – and even that has been stolen in the meantime; no one knows where it is.
I had personal experience of this. While in Odesa, Yanukovych had dinner at a very famous restaurant there and liked it so much he decided to take the restaurant over. The owner was a friend of a friend in Kyiv who told me he came to lobby Bankova to back off. He was offered half the value of the restaurant and took it. “Getting half of its value was a pretty good deal under Yanukovych as usually he just takes what he wants and pays nothing.”
Ukraine became a true mafia state under Yanukovych – a label usually reserved for Russia.
He was ousted and replaced by former President Petro Poroshenko who was a bit better, but even Poroshenko remains an oligarch, having earned billions from his Roshen chocolate empire. He was supposed to put all his assets into trust after taking office and never did it – maintain business and sales in Russia even after the 2014 annexation of the Crimea and eventually ended up in the Panama Papers leak.
He wasn’t as bad as Yanukovych – I’d say the only leader worse than Yanukovych in the Former Soviet Union (FSU) in the last 30 years was probably Turkmenbashi, the late leader of Turkmenistan – but while he did make some reforms, the old system was alive and well.
One of the good things he did was appoint Lithuanian born ex-investment banker Aivaras Abromavičius, who worked for Sweden’s East Capital and married a local and was appointed Economics Minister. Abromavičius, who I know personally, was the real McCoy and one of the few high ups with real international investment banking experience and could actually spell “corporate governance.”
Abromavičius made a real stab at cleaning things up and, for example, closed down a scheme where uber-oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky, and Zelenskiy’s business partner and election sponsor, had injected a “trading company” between the state oil company Ukrnafta and state procurement that was charging 15% for any deal, but did nothing else. That deal was worth tens of millions of dollars a year.
However, eventually Abromavičius gave up and quit in spectacular fashion with a public press conference on February 3, 2016 where he accused the Poroshenko regime of endemic corruption.
"My team and I have no wish to be a cover for open corruption or puppets under the control of those who want to establish control over state money in the style of the old authorities," he said at the presser. "I don't want to be part of this free-for-all… but we have to wake up from lethargic sleep. I don't think things will change quickly.”
Investment banker Aivaras Abromavičius was appointed Economics Minister until he quit in 2016 with a press conference complaining about endemic corruption in the Poroshenko administration.
The problem he explained to me was Poroshenko tried to appoint a deputy to the head of a ministry department making procurements and control its cashflow; as minister, Abromavičius was supposed to be in charge of all appointments in his own ministry and was trying to oust these placemen as a key part of his anti-corruption efforts. His press conference caused a major political crisis as it completely undermined Poroshenko’s efforts to get the EU and US on board in his escalating war with Russia, which was in the process of splitting the Donbas off from the government’s control.
Some progress
Still, despite all this, some real progress has been made in selected directions. First of all, to note that the creation of the triumvirate of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU), the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO) and the Anti-Corruption Court (ACC) – forced on Ukraine by its western partners – is a revolution. Nothing like this exists in any of the other FSU states.
Tellingly, Poroshenko couldn’t stop the creations of NABU and SAPO, but successfully blocked the creation of the ACC for years. And NABU has itself been stymied by the powers that be for years; when it arrested its first big fish, Poroshenko's right-hand man Roman Nasirov in 2017, and charged him with embezzling millions of dollars he spent a weekend in jail. However, before the judge arrived to arraign him on Monday morning, a delegation of Rada deputies showed up along with Nasirov’s wife who brought a bag containing a million dollars to pay his bail – scenes that have been repeated in the last month with high officials close to Zelenskiy coming up with millions of dollars for bail in the Energoatom corruption scandal. Not only did NABU never get Nasirov in front of the bench, he went on to run against Zelenskiy in the 2019 elections.
But the triumvirate is real and has real powers. In what is now widely taken as a sign that Zelenskiy administration is little different from all the others, he tried to close them down last year with Law 21414 in an obvious authoritarian style: the Rada deputies were ordered back from summer holiday at the weekend and the three votes were rammed through in one sitting that would have put the two agencies under direct presidential control. It was a move worthy of Putin, but thanks to Ukraine’s vibrant civil society, demonstrations immediately broke out and Zelenskiy was forced to back down and cancel the law. NABU is now on a roll and actually arresting people from the very top of the tree.
Maybe the most significant change is Kolomoisky has been arrested and is in jail. One of IntelliNews claims to fame is our cover story “Privat Investigations” that uncovered the rampant stealing at Ukraine’s largest commercial bank, caused it to be nationalised in December 2016.
The banking sector has been comprehensively cleaned up by former NBU governor Valeria Gontareva, but she decided to leave the country after Kolomoisky threatened her life and had a coffin with her effigy delivered to the doors of the NBU. She was later hospitalised in London after being hit by a car in what UK police have called “suspicious circumstances.”
Oh, and her house in Kyiv was burnt to the ground by “unknown” arsonists.
But maybe the biggest success has been the reforms at Naftogaz, the state-owned gas company. Corruption in the gas business in the 1990s was insane. Ukraine was transiting huge amounts of gas from Russia to Europe and earning $3bn a year in transit fees, not counting the money that could be made from stealing Russian gas from the pipes. Everyone had a hand in this – Russian government officials, Ukrainian government officials, the board members of Gazprom and Naftogaz. It was the major gravy train at time, organised via another set of “trading” companies that did nothing.
And it was so blatant. I once sent our Romanian correspondent to the “office” of Eural Trans Gas, one of the main traders doing several billion dollars of business a year. The office turned out to be an empty apartment in a rundown block in Transylvania where neighbours said no one lives. I also interviewed the CEO of Itera, Igor Makarov, the Russian gas trading company in this partnership, who plays gold in his office with a solid gold putter, which he showed me. One of the reasons Ukraine is so poor is that this gas business, which should have funded investment, was bled dry by Ukraine’s own elite and the Russian executives.
That has stopped now. Naftogaz is a well-run business and where it used to be a black hole supported by massive budget grants, it is now the biggest taxpayer in the country. The fact that Zelenskiy appointed Serhii Koretskyi the new Prime Minister is really good news. He is not a politician, but an oil and gas man and comes to his new job from running Naftogaz. He is as close as you can get in Ukraine to a clean and professional pair of hands in charge of one of the country’s biggest sources of cash.
So, there is hope. But there is so much work left to do. The judiciary remains rotten to the core. Brussels downgraded Ukraine to a “B” in its last EU accession bid assessment report precisely because of the lack of progress in the anti-corruption fight and judicial reforms in the so-called “Fundamental” cluster.
Zelenskiy was elected in 2019 on an anti-corruption platform, and compared to oligarch Poroshenko, he was clearly a cleaner pair of hands. And he has taken that pledge seriously, at least until the war started three years in. He broke ties with Kolomoisky and even put him in jail. He forced through the anti-Kolomoisky law in May 2020 that made it impossible for the former owner of a bank that has been nationalised to retake control of it – aka PrivatBank. He then followed up with an anti-oligarch speech in March 2021 and anti-oligarch law in September 2021 which has redrawn the map.
But he made almost no progress on reforming the judiciary or beefing up property rights, without which Ukraine has no hope of attracting the circa $600bn of private capital it needs to rebuild. To be fair he has been distracted by fighting a major war against Russia, but he can also be accused of turning a blind eye to the blatant racketeering by deputies who he shares an office with.
Personally, I think it’s because everyone in Ukraine is so inured to corruption they don’t see it as a major problem. A common attitude I have heard in Kyiv is: “If you can, of course you steal. Why not? I would.”
Ukraine's anti-corruption bureau accuses presidential office officials of a raiding scheme
NABU says a criminal organisation run by two MPs and senior Bankova officials used hackers and forged court rulings to seize Kyiv property. / bne IntelliNews
By Ben Aris in Berlin August 20, 2026
Ukraine's anti-corruption agencies have accused a sitting MP, a former MP and at least two senior officials from the Presidential Office of running an organised scheme to seize companies and property with forged documents.
The National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) set out the allegations in a video released on their Telegram channels on August 20, under the codename “Femida” (Themis). It follows a notification of suspicion served on August 19 under articles 191, 206-2, 358 and 361 of Ukraine's criminal code, covering misappropriation, unlawful takeover of a company, forgery and unauthorised interference with computer systems that were served on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s deputy head of staff, Iryna Mudra.
Iryna Mudra, deputy head of the President's Office, has been photographed wearing extremely expensive jewellery and watches while on the job. Source: @panchenko.
The alleged mechanism was administrative rather than violent. Hackers posing as state registrars are said to have entered the register of legal entities and filed forged documents transferring ownership from the real owners to front men who were, according to the agencies, bodyguards of one of the organisers. Company assets seized this way in the autumn of 2025 exceeded UAH248mn ($5.5mn), the agencies say, and in May 2026 the group is alleged to have tried to take Kyiv properties worth more than UAH207mn ($4.6mn).
Raiding is the oldest crime in the post-Soviet corporate playbook, but the normally conducted by organised criminal groups or even legitimate. The fact that this scheme was organised by people working in the office of the president of Ukraine is highly unusual. The fresh scandal will only add to concerns about runaway corruption in Bankova in the midst of the metastasizing $100mn kickback scam at the state utility Energoatom corruption scandal.
The case arrives while parliament and the Bankova are already at odds over who controls the anti-corruption agencies and will only fuel the growing domestic political crisis Zelenskiy is facing as his authority with his own Servant of the People (SOTP) party is being undermined by the corruption allegations. Zelenskiy himself has not been accused of corruption, but under the Ukrainian constitution NABU is barred from investigating a sitting president.
The new scandal will also undermine support for Ukraine in Brussels which downgraded Ukraine to “B” in its latest EU accession bid progress report for backsliding on corruption targets.
NABU named the alleged perpetrators as cited by Ekonomichna Pravda:
Iryna Mudra was, until August 19, deputy head of the President's Office, where her portfolio covered judicial and legal reform, the push for a special tribunal for Russia and the international mechanism to compensate Ukraine for war damage. She was searched on the morning of August 19 and dismissed by presidential decree that afternoon.
Viktor Dubovyk is director-general of the legal policy directorate at the President's Office.
Olena Ferens is deputy justice minister. The agencies say the group leaned on senior Justice Ministry officials to keep control of the companies it had seized, and that some of those approached refused.
Maksym Mykytas is a former MP, and it was his bail hearing that produced the list. Four of the other names are described as his subordinates, associates or staff. The High Anti-Corruption Court was due to set his pre-trial restriction on August 20.
Vadym Stolar is a sitting MP, elected for the now-banned Opposition Platform - For Life, whose Kyiv branch he ran from 2019 to 2022. He has featured in a series of journalistic investigations into construction in the capital. He confirmed NABU had searched his home and said he was cooperating openly with law enforcement.
Vasyl Astion is a businessman and a former member of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast Council.
Mykola Hladyshenko is the suspended chair of the supervisory board of Sense Bank, the lender the state took over in 2023. National Bank of Ukraine governor Andrii Pyshnyi is seeking to strip him of his powers, with the rest of the board also at risk.
Oleh Stupak is chair of Sense Bank's management board and the bank's chief executive.
Liudmyla Snihur heads a department at Sense Bank.
Valentyn Yelizarov is a Mykytas subordinate and head of Metrobud LLC.
Mykyta Tarkovskyi is described only as linked to Mykytas.
Yehor Merkulov is Mykytas's driver and the nominal head of Montage Service LLC.
Oleksandr Ostapenko is Mykytas's bodyguard and the nominal director of Philosophy Development LLC - one of the front men the agencies say the forged ownership documents transferred companies to.
Manipulating the machine
NABU Aware that dispossessed owners might go to the police, the organisers are said to have arranged for a criminal case to be opened on a complaint from people under their control and for the seized companies' corporate rights to be placed under arrest, making any further registration action impossible.
Where the register would not do the work, the courts did. The agencies describe fictitious debts created to trigger bankruptcy proceedings in a commercial court, and at least one case of real estate in central Kyiv seized on the strength of a forged court ruling entered into the property register by hackers.
Not everyone approached went along with it. Justice Ministry officials "aware of the consequences of carrying out the illegal instructions of the deputy head of the Presidential Office, refused to take part in the crime," the video says, and that particular attempt failed.
The financing is specific. A co-organiser and sitting member of parliament put at least $514,000 into the operation, according to the investigation, spent on paying hackers and on court proceedings, described by the agencies as illegal benefits to law enforcement and judicial bodies.
The NABU video carries fragments of intercepted conversations. One voice, which Interfax-Ukraine reports resembles that of Mudra is heard saying in Russian: "I've basically talked myself into a criminal charge, you understand?"
Another fragment attributed to the same voice said plainly: "Corruption needs to be systematized and controlled… it shouldn't be fought, it should be controlled." Elsewhere on the recordings the suspects complain that they cannot get information out of NABU and SAPO, and discuss how the anti-corruption system might be brought under control.
This is the second wave of NABU disclosures in as many days, following videos codenamed "Forrest Gump" and "Femida" on money laundering and raiding involving senior officials. It also follows a year in which corruption convictions fell and custodial sentences all but disappeared.
The most high profile official to be caught up in the corruption allegations is head of Ukraine’s presidential office, Andriy Yermak, who largely ran the government for Zelenskiy until he was forced to quit after he was named in the Energoatom scandal. He was later released on bail as the corruption and money laundering investigation intensified scrutiny of Kyiv’s anti-corruption drive at a sensitive moment for the country. He pledged to join the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) and go to the frontline, but according to reports remains in Kyiv and politically active.
