Tuesday, April 28, 2020

COVID-19: Outbreak worsens at Superior Poultry in Coquitlam BC

DAVID CARRIGG More from David Carrigg
Published:April 28, 2020


Henry said the outbreak at the Superior Poultry processing plant in Coquitlam has worsened, with 46 cases.

A spike in COVID-19 infections related to two chicken processing plants owned by the Pollon family was responsible for over half of the new cases reported on Tuesday.

Provincial health officer, Dr. Bonnie Henry, said there were now 46 cases from the Superior Poultry plant in Coquitlam, while the number at its sister United Poultry plant in Vancouver was steady.

The plants are responsible for at least 80 new cases since a mass outbreak was uncovered at the United plant on April 20 – with 39 of the 55 positive tests reported Tuesday connected to the spread of the virus from within the poultry processors. The Pollon family of Abbotsford also own the Hallmark Poultry plant in the Downtown Eastside that has not been impacted by the outbreaks.

Workers transferring between the two facilities spread the disease.

“The majority of our cases today come from the ongoing investigations in two poultry producing plants,” Henry said.

The largest community outbreak in B.C. is within the Mission Institution federal prison, that now has 120 cases (two more than Monday.)

Henry said the Mission Institution outbreak was problematic because it has been identified late.

On Monday, more than three dozen organizations from across British Columbia and Canada demanded an immediate inquest into the April 15th death of a Mission Institution inmate due to COVID-19.

Thirty-eight groups representing human rights, prisoners’ rights, health and legal interests have sent a letter to B.C.’s chief coroner and solicitor general saying an immediate inquest is in the public interest.


Henry said that two people died between noon Monday and noon Tuesday, bringing the B.C. death toll to 105.

There are now 94 people with COVID-19 in hospital, including 37 in intensive care. Of the 2,053 cases reported in B.C., 717 are active. Most of those sick people are recovering in isolation at home or in long-term care facilities.

Henry said the intensive-care fatality rate in B.C. is lower than other parts of the world. She said there have been a number of COVID-19 complications appearing, including stroke and blood clots.

Five COVID-19 cases have been reported among children under five, and 14 cases in people aged 10 to 19. Only one of those cases has ended up in hospital.

Henry said she believes restrictions will start to be lifted between the middle and end of May.

She said testing had been expanded to pick up anybody in B.C. with respiratory sickness who may have COVID-19. She said young people are less impacted by COVID-19 and that if a vaccine comes, it will not be mandatory.

B.C. Health Minister Adrian Dix said the province is keeping up with demand for personal protective equipment.

Also on Tuesday, the Ministry of Transportation announced commercial food trucks will be able to set up at rest areas and scales used by the trucking industry.

The B.C. Trucking Association had asked government to find a way to allow truckers to get a meal on the road, after most restaurants closed.

Along with allowing food trucks, the province has also installed more than 25 portable toilets at commercial pullouts and inspection stations.

Education Minister Rob Fleming said no date has been set for a return to class for students.

He said he wanted to learn from other provinces and countries like New Zealand before starting to reopen schools. Several thousand children whose parents are essential-service workers are attending schools, and there are plans to accommodate more of them, he said.

Vancouver Coastal Health announced its Inner City COVID-19 Response Strategy to deal with potential outbreaks in the Downtown Eastside.

The Ministry of Agriculture also revealed funding would be made available for animal shelters, the B.C. SPCA and zoo to cover emergency food and medicine costs.

Canada has 50,016 known cases of COVID-19.

More than 2,800 of those cases have been fatal.

The world has now seen more than three million cases of COVID-19 since it appeared at the start of the year, with about 215,000 related deaths.

With files from Canadian Press

— With files from The Canadian Press

COVID-19: Inmate suit filed against federal government over Mission outbreak


KIM BOLAN More from Kim Bolan
Published:April 23, 2020


"It is the worst outbreak in Canada and we expect the figure to rise because CSC just announced this week that all inmates will soon be tested." — lawyer Jeffrey Hartman

A lawyer representing inmates at the COVID-19-infested Mission Institution filed a class-action lawsuit against the federal government Thursday for failing to protect the men inside.

Jeffrey Hartman, who specializes in prison law, said the suit was filed “because the government that maintains total control over these Canadians failed them.”

Hartman said 20 per cent of the medium-security prison’s more than 300 inmates had tested positive for the coronavirus as of Thursday.

“It is the worst outbreak in Canada and we expect the figure to rise because CSC just announced this week that all inmates will soon be tested,” Hartman said.

He said the federal government and the Correctional Service Canada knew “an outbreak would have devastating consequences but failed to take adequate steps to prevent and mitigate it.”

“Aside from obvious physical health consequences, inmates are now confined to 8 x 12 foot cells for 23 hours and 40 minutes per day, for days on end, with significant mental health consequences. At least one inmate has attempted suicide.”

Another inmate died earlier this month due to complications from the virus.

Todd Howley, the inmate plaintiff in the lawsuit, tested positive for the virus even though prison staff suggested it was just allergies when he first developed symptoms, according to the statement of claim.

“This action is brought on behalf of all people who are or were incarcerated in Mission Institution and tested positive for COVID-19 or had COVID-19 symptoms since November of 2019,” the document says.

Mission Institution at 8751 Stave Lake St., Mission, B.C. Francis Georgian / PNG

“The government’s prison population is at heightened risk of infection due to population density, close living quarters, shared amenities such as telephones, underlying illness and health vulnerabilities, and often unhygienic and unsanitary conditions.”

The suit alleges that as early as the middle of March “CSC staff and inmates, originally in the food handling area, began to develop COVID-19 and flu-like symptoms.”

Howley had “sinus issues and headaches, as well as other symptoms related to the coronavirus.

The suit says even though the inmates were locked down about April 2, CSC staff continued to come and go from the prison.

“It was not until approximately April 20, 2020 that staff underwent rigorous decontamination on entering Mission Institution,” the suit says, adding that a hazmat team was finally brought in to decontaminate the buildings the same day.

Meanwhile because of the lockdown, Howley and the other inmates are “enduring severe lockdown conditions” including for at least a week in April, “a total deprivation of exercise, shower and telephone.”

Meals were small and not being served regularly — for a week, the inmates got McDonald’s meals. Inmates were not only unable to call family, but had trouble reaching their lawyers as well, the suit says.

Mission Institution at 8751 Stave Lake St., Mission, B.C. Francis Georgian / PNG

The lockdown led “a high state of tension causing or exacerbating the risk of harm as well as mental health symptoms such as anxiety and depression.”

Howley and other inmates got sick because the CSC failed to take “adequate measures to protect the plaintiff and class from COVID-19,” then failed to “provide appropriate medical care in a timely manner or at all.”

The CSC violated its own regulations, as well as the Charter rights of the inmates, the suit said.

Attempts should have been made to “depopulate Mission Institution by releasing low risk inmates on bail, parole, or through other legal mechanisms.”

The inmates are seeking damages and a declaration that their rights were violated as well as an order certifying the class action suit.

The CSC has not yet filed a response to the lawsuit.

Meanwhile, B.C.’s public health officer, Dr. Bonnie Henry said Thursday that the “challenging” Mission outbreak was up to 78 cases including both inmates and staff members.

In a statement provided before the lawsuit was filed, CSC communications adviser Martine Rondeau said “we are doing everything possible to prevent further transmission of COVID-19 including reviewing local infection and control measures in collaboration with several external experts.”

“We have been making every effort to give inmates time outside of their cells. Staffing levels can fluctuate and we have called out for volunteers to work at the site,” she said. “We also need to make sure that time out of cells is done safely to prevent further spread. This means making sure inmates remain at least 2 metres apart and that effective cleaning and disinfecting is done multiple times per day.”

kbolan@postmedia.com

twitte

AFL warns labour minister that more deaths will occur if he doesn’t crack down on employers

“If your government is really serious about protecting the front-line workers who you call heroes – and if you’re really serious about protecting the public by stopping the spread of the coronavirus – then you need to take the lead on ensuring that public health directives are followed in Alberta workplaces, rather than leaving compliance up to employers. If you don’t take a more aggressive approach, we are certain that there will be more infections and more deaths. Do you really want that to be your legacy?” 
Ignoring US Alarms, Alberta Meat Packers Spawned Canada’s Biggest Outbreak
As the virus gripped US plants, the union pleaded for a shutdown. They were rebuffed.

Andrew Nikiforuk 24 Apr 2020 | TheTyee.ca
Tyee contributing editor Andrew Nikiforuk is an award-winning journalist whose books and articles focus on epidemics, the energy industry, nature and more.


Cargill’s High River, Alta. meat-packing plant, shut down due to a deadly outbreak weeks after its union pleaded for a temporary closure and safer working conditions. Photo: Brent Calver, Okotoks Western Wheel.


Canada’s largest outbreak of COVID-19 swept through two meat-packing plants in southern Alberta two weeks after the provincial government ignored union requests to temporarily close both of the plants.

And it mirrored a series of recent, well-documented hot-zone eruptions in meat plants in the United States.

More than 600 immigrant workers and community members have been infected while the disease has killed at least three people at Cargill’s High River plant and the JBS food plant in Brooks, Alta.

“The real issue here is a moral issue,” charged Thomas Hesse, president of the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 401, which represents workers at the plants. “How do we as a society want to bring food to our tables?”

Rac
elh Notley, the former premier of Alberta, has called for a full public inquiry.

“It is unconscionable that we now have a situation where hundreds of people have contracted a deadly virus,” said Notley, who leads the NDP Official Opposition. “What kind of concerns put the lives of workers so low?” she asked on CBC Radio yesterday.

Alberta’s growing outbreaks follow in the wake of deadly events in the U.S. where meat-packing plants have become COVID-19 incubators.

The U.S. recorded its largest single cluster of cases at a pork-processing facility in Sioux Falls, South Dakota in early April. By the time the Chinese-owned facility closed for two weeks there were nearly 900 cases.

In the U.S., rates of coronavirus infection are 75 per cent higher in rural counties housing large beef, pork and poultry-processing plants, a USA Today investigation found. But leading up to meat-plant outbreaks there, as in Alberta, government authorities largely ignored warnings from workers, unions and immigrant groups.

Two days before the Cargill shutdown, Alberta Agriculture Minister Devin Dreeshen tweeted to workers “their worksite is safe.”

Meat-packing plants, which crowd workers into close quarters, now vie with nursing homes as places conducive to viral spread.

“Initially our concern was long-term care facilities,” said Gary Anthone, Nebraska’s chief medical officer, last week. “If there’s one thing that might keep me up at night, it’s the meat-processing plants and the manufacturing plants.”

The Alberta outbreaks should have caught no one by surprise, University of Ottawa public health expert Amir Attaran told The Tyee.

“It definitely should have been predicted by the health and safety inspectors that these would be hot spots,” said Attaran. He noted that “Alberta was doing inspections by video,” raising questions whether there was “an effort to prevent the inspectors doing their jobs.”

In mid-March the union representing Alberta workers at meat plants called upon Cargill and JBS Food to prepare to shut down in case of an outbreak.

Cargill’s food plant, which is located in High River, and JBS Food in Brooks, are both high-volume kill factories. They control 85 per cent of the nation’s beef slaughtering capacity. A smaller Cargill plant in Guelph, Ontario does the rest.

Cargill slaughters up to 4,500 beef cows a day and JBS 4,200 daily. Nearly all beef sold in Canada’s grocery stores comes from one of these three foreign-owned plants.


In response to the union’s questions about preparations for shutdowns, Cargill replied it was going to keep “our facilities open and operating because now, more than ever, families across Canada and around the world are relying on us to deliver safe, affordable protein.”

JBS said, “We are allowing employees age 70 or older, employees who are pregnant, and employees who [are] currently being treated for cancer, to go on a voluntary leave of absence and receive short-term disability benefits during that period.”

And then the first cases emerged at Cargill in early April.

Workers at the plant say they were unable to avoid infection risks at the Cargill plant located just north of High River, a community of 14,000 people.

At the Cargill plants, which disassemble beef cows into steaks and roasts, employees, many of whom are immigrant labourers from 50 different countries, work shoulder to shoulder. While Cargill implemented some new measures to limit virus transmission, physical distancing is a near impossibility in a modern meat-packing plant.

Among such operations in the U.S., there have been scores of COVID-19 outbreaks. One at a massive JBS plant in Greeley, Colo. infected hundreds of workers and killed at least four in early April. The plant, which slaughtered 5,400 cattle a day and employed 6,000 people, eventually closed for two weeks.

Meanwhile the contagion in Alberta continued to grow. After more cases emerged at Cargill in early April, Alberta Health Services inspected the plant on April 7.

Thomas Hesse asked for a written report but was told there was none, and that the Calgary regional arm of health services relied on “verbal reports” from its staff that the plant was safe.

But by Easter the virus had continued to spread and as many as 38 cases had appeared among workers.

On April 12, Easter Sunday, the UFCW’s Hesse formally requested that the province shut down the Cargill and JBS plants for two weeks.

“That week my mind was squirming like a toad because I had seen all these places close in the United States and the government had said one in six Albertans were going to carry the virus,” Hesse told The Tyee. “My grandmother told me an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, but with this pandemic there is no cure so we need more protection.”

His letter argued that temporary shutdown would save lives and would not affect the flow of beef significantly. The letter also referenced outbreaks at meat-packing plants in the U.S.: “The numbers that are emerging from comparable plants in North America have now reached a tipping point so as to obviously necessitate new preventative action in your plants. There are now reports of 30 North American UFCW member deaths. Employees are scared. Your employees are scared. It is time to act. It is time to protect life.”

At the same time, 267 members of the Filipino community in High River sent a letter to High River Mayor Craig Snodgrass requesting his help to convince Cargill to close its plant for two weeks. “We are mentally bothered and anxious,” they wrote, “even paranoid about the fact that even mildest symptoms spreading day by day thinking would somehow lead to the conclusion that they might be already positive carriers of the virus.”

The signers added that the company had ignored their pleas. “They don’t even care to provide masks for their workers, they told them to provide their own if they wanted to. It is very sad to know that the health of the employees are definitely not their concern. They are only after PROFIT!”

In response to these entreaties, Dreeshen said plants like Cargill have to remain open. He told CTV News that he was confident that changes the companies had made, including Plexiglas barriers, temperature checks and protective equipment would protect workers.

“These plants need to be operational in order for our food-supply system to operate,” pronounced Dreeshen on April 14.

Cargill accused Hesse of being “inflammatory” and scaring workers away from the plant. (Read the letter here.)
Inside Cargill’s High River meat-packing plant before the COVID-19 pandemic. Photo: Cargill.

After Easter, UFCW Local 401 filed a formal complaint with Alberta Occupational Health and Safety about conditions at Cargill’s High River plant and concerns about the virus. OHS then performed a virtual inspection involving visuals provided by a cell phone on April 16.

No workers were interviewed, and the inspector never stepped into the plant.

“We have a staff of 70 at the union, and they didn’t ask any of us to participate,” said Hesse. He called an inspection of the massive facility via cell phone “ridiculous.”

On April 15, Alberta Health Services set up a dedicated testing facility in High River and it soon recorded hundreds of positive cases. The AHS attributed some of the cases to carpooling at the plant and the fact that a high number of Cargill workers shared living space.

“But the reason they are sharing vehicles and living together is because they can’t cope with rents and living costs because they are working at the plant,” said Hesse. “It’s the petri dish that connects everyone together.”

Authorities, Cargill and government ministers again tried to reassure employees that their workplace was safe during a telephone town meeting on April 18.

That was followed the next day by a union telephone conference where 2,000 members were asked if they were afraid of going into work because of the outbreak: 85 per cent said yes. The union informed its members of their basic right to refuse dangerous work.

Cargill didn’t idle the plant until April 20, when Chief Medical Health Officer Dr. Deena Hinshaw announced the first death from the outbreak.

“They are only closing because people weren’t coming into work,” explained union spokesperson Michael Hughes. “They refuse to call it a shutdown. They call it idling.”

The head of the U.S. conglomerate that owns Cargill’s Alberta plant announced the closure in a statement. “Considering the community-wide impacts of the virus, we encourage all employees to get tested for the COVID-19 virus as now advised by Alberta Health Services as soon as possible,” said Jon Nash, president of Cargill Protein.

The JBS facility, owned by a Brazilian conglomerate, is still operating one shift of 1,000 workers despite several hospitalizations and one death. “Increased absenteeism” forced the change, said the company, despite increased wages of $4 an hour.

When Cargill finally closed, Alberta Premier Jason Kenney downplayed the event at a daily press conference, saying that Alberta had 200 meat processing facilities and that only one per cent were affected. He did not mention that the two plants combined, Cargill and JBS plants, slaughtered most of the beef in the country.

Hesse remains critical of the province’s response as rates of infection and deaths rise. Neither the government nor Cargill “adequately protected workers, and now our members are getting sick and dying. If our members’ work is essential, they shouldn’t be treated like they are expendable.”

Hesse says the province needs to make changes to protect workers at meat plants as well as grocery stores. “We are calling for an independent, worker-centred review of health and safety in food processing facilities and grocery stores, to create a clear, effective and well-enforced regulatory regime for Alberta’s food sector.”



COVID-19 Sparks Push to Improve BC’s Food Security READ MORE

Yesterday, April 24, the government of Alberta announced that Occupational Health and Safety would investigate conditions at both plants by sending inspectors inside their walls.

But Hesse says that it may be too late to repair trust. “Our members have lost faith in the ability of OHS to protect workers,” he said.

The UFCW Local 401 is the largest private sector union in Western Canada and represents 32,000 Alberta workers mainly in the food processing and retail sector.

To some ranchers and farmers, Alberta’s outbreaks illustrate the fragility of an industrial food system focused on bigness, efficiency and foreign ownership.

“Excessive concentration of ownership and centralization of beef processing, supported and encouraged by our federal and provincial governments, has now put the health of workers, the beef supply and the livelihoods of thousands of farmers in jeopardy,” said Iain Aitken, a member of the National Farmers Union and Manitoba beef producer.

---30---
Labour group calls for criminal investigation into Cargill beef plant COVID-19 death

AMANDA STEPHENSON, CALGARY HERALD April 22, 2020 

The Cargill plant north of High River, AB, south of Calgary is shown on Friday, April 17, 2020. Jim Wells/Postmedia

'There's no doubt in our minds that this is a workplace fatality,' said AFL president Gil McGowan on Tuesday

The COVID-19 death of a High River meat plant employee must be treated as a workplace fatality and a criminal investigation should be launched, the Alberta Federation of Labour said Tuesday.

In a letter Tuesday to provincial Labour Minister Jason Copping, AFL president Gil McGowan called for a formal Occupational Health & Safety investigation into the circumstances of the death — which was made public Monday and is the first fatality to result from a large-scale COVID-19 outbreak at the Cargill meat processing plant in High River.

Occupational Health & Safety investigates serious work site incidents, including fatalities, which fall under provincial jurisdiction. OHS is currently working through the formal process to determine whether to open a fatality investigation, Adrienne South, spokeswoman for Copping, said Thursday evening.

The provincial labour group also called for the meat plant’s operator, Cargill Inc., to be subject to an RCMP criminal investigation under the federal Westray Act, a rarely used amendment to the Criminal Code that allows employers to be prosecuted in cases of negligence leading to a workplace injury or death.

“There’s no doubt in our minds that this is a workplace fatality,” McGowan said in an interview. “And also that it could have been avoided, had the employer and the government suspended operations at that plant when the workers and their union called for it more than two weeks ago.”

As of Tuesday, 401 workers at the High River meat-packing plant — which represents 36 per cent of Canada’s beef processing capacity — had tested positive for COVID-19. On Monday, Cargill announced it would temporarily idle the entire facility and encouraged all employees to seek testing for the virus.

However, the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 401, which represents workers at the Cargill plant, has been saying for weeks the Minnesota-based company wasn’t doing enough to protect employees.

Union local president Thomas Hesse wrote to Cargill in mid-April, stating that work was being carried out in a manner contrary to social distancing and endangering roughly 2,000 workers at the facility. At the time, Hesse demanded a two-week closure and a full cleaning and safety inspection of the plant.

Earlier this month, OHS did conduct an inspection of the Cargill plant in High River to review the COVID-19 safety measures being taken to protect workers. The inspection determined that reasonable precautions were being taken by the employer.

However, Hesse has been critical of that inspection, which was conducted via videoconference and not in person by an OHS officer. (South said the reason the inspection was conducted via videoconference was because of the pandemic, and said this method of inspection is not specific or unique to the Cargill facility.)

“We can’t trust the government on this now, because they could have closed this plant and didn’t,” Hesse said Thursday.

Both Hesse and the AFL are calling for both the Olymel pork processing plant at Red Deer and the JBS meat processing plant at Brooks (which had 77 confirmed cases of Tuesday afternoon) to also be temporarily shut down out of concerns for worker safety.

JBS spokesman Cameron Bruett said in an email Tuesday the Brooks plant has reduced production to one shift, given “increased absenteeism.”

Bruett said the JBS facility has a responsibility to maintain operations to secure the country’s food supply, but added “we will not operate a facility if we do not believe it is safe or if absenteeism levels result in our inability to safely operate.”

Both JBS and Cargill have consistently said they have been implementing temperature testing, enhanced cleaning and sanitizing, face coverings, screening between employee stations, prohibiting visitors, adopting distancing practices where possible and offering staggered breaks and shift flexibility.



AHS officials responded as soon the Cargill outbreak was identified and enhanced safety protocols were put in place, Dr. Deena Hinshaw, Alberta’s chief medical officer of health, said Tuesday.

“But because there are so many people that go in and out of these plants, it’s possible that spread did occur before those protective measures were put into place,” Hinshaw said.

NDP Opposition Leader Rachel Notley — who has urged all meat plant workers sick with COVID-19 to apply for WCB compensation — said the Cargill employee’s death, as well as the outbreak at the entire facility, should be subject to an OHS investigation.

She also criticized Agriculture Minister Devin Dreeshen, who, two days before the fatality was confirmed and the closure of the plant was announced, publicly assured employees and Albertans that Cargill had taken “all necessary measures” to mitigate risk to its staff.

“It’s outrageous that we’re at a place today where hundreds of people have contracted a deadly virus because the UCP couldn’t see past the supply chain to the people at work,” Notley said in a news release.

The AFL and UFCW are calling for an independent safety inspection of the Cargill plant, as well as the development of a provincewide plan to prevent future outbreaks at meat plants.

Myles Leslie, associate director of research with the University of Calgary’s School of Public Policy, said it may be necessary for all three plants to be closed and completely redesigned to keep workers safe while still producing food.

“We may need to completely shut, hit the reset button, redo the production line so that everyone is two metres apart,” Leslie said. “Production will have to go down. But back online at 50 per cent is a whole lot better than shut down at zero per cent, or 100 per cent with everybody sick.”
---30---

Day of Mourning 2020: UCP government failing to put worker safety first
Alberta meatpacking plant COVID-19 outbreaks highlight need for better worker safety

Today is the Day of Mourning. It’s the day we remember all the workers who have been killed, injured or exposed to illness because of work. This year we need to get particularly angry and vocal. Here in Alberta, the UCP’s irresponsible refusal to apply basic workplace health and safety principles to the COVID-19 crisis is literally killing workers. We need to speak out and demand better. The government may be able to label workers as essential: but that doesn’t mean they should be treated as expendable.
Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, this year’s Day of Mourning looks vastly different. In Alberta, the Calgary and District Labour Council will have a Zoom broadcast of a wreath-laying ceremony at noon MDT and the Edmonton and District Labour Council has shared a video. The AFL will be connecting to these through social media channels and we encourage everyone to take a moment to reflect on those we’ve lost due to their workplaces and what our world would look like when we put worker safety first. Today we mourn, tomorrow we fight for a safer future. 

CONSPIRACY TV THE PRISONER





PRELUDE

SECRET AGENT
SECRET AGENT MAN THEY HAVE GIVEN YOU A NUMBER AND TAKEN AWAY YOUR NAME 



DANGER MAN 

AMERICANS CONTEND THIS IS THE BRITISH VERSION OF SECRET AGENT 
THAT PREMIERED ON US TV, SINCE CANADA GETS BOTH BRITISH TV, 
SHOWS AND AMERICAN 

DANGER MAN IS IN BW CAME OUT SAME TIME
AS THE AVENGERS, AGAIN BW TV OF THE EARLY SIXTIES, DANGER MAN
TAKES PLACE IN A FICTIONAL ALBANIA AND YUGOSLAVIA ALONG WITH THE MEDITERRANEAN FOR FUN RELAXATION AND SOMETHING BAD IS GOING TO HAPPEN

SECRET AGENT WAS A COMPLETELY NEW SERIES IN DIFFERENT LOCALES
THAN DANGER MAN 

IT WAS IN COLOUR AND COMPETING WITH THE AVENGERS IN THE UK
AND MAN FROM UNCLE IN THE USA 


Scientists Now Say No, They Weren’t Reporting The First Case Of A Dead Body Spreading The Coronavirus

The authors of the controversial report issued a correction saying their initial claims were misinterpreted. “This is really unusual, you don't publish a report that someone is dead and then say, no he isn't,” another scientist said.



John Minchillo / AP
Dan Vergano BuzzFeed News Reporter April 23, 2020

A scientific journal has published a correction from two authors who had previously penned a short report suggesting that the coronavirus had spread from a corpse — a highly unusual measure only taken after a Thai journalist contacted BuzzFeed News about the accuracy of the journal’s report.

On April 12, the Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine announced “the first report on COVID-19 infection and death among medical personnel in a Forensic Medicine unit,” which BuzzFeed News reported the next day. The authors of the report, Won Sriwijitalai of the RVT Medical Center in Bangkok and Viroj Wiwanitkit of Hainan Medical University in China, linked the death to “contact with biological samples and corpses.”

It was a groundbreaking statement from two scientists that captured the world’s attention, as experts scramble to understand how the coronavirus behaves and spreads among humans and animals.

But on Thursday, the journal published a correction from the authors. The original report was poorly written, the authors explained, and had resulted in “misinterpretation.”

“The authors regret that the article might not have good writing for clarification in the primary text and it might result in misinterpretation,” they wrote. “The authors did not mean to suggest that the victim had died, and that the authors do not know for sure and cannot scientifically confirm that the virus moved from the dead body.”

Asked about the correction, the journal’s editor, Tim Thompson, a professor of applied biological anthropology at Teesside University in the UK, said by email, “We have been chasing this down this past week. We’re hoping this will clear the situation up now.”

Elsevier, the publisher of the Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine and one of the leading science journal publishers in the world, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The correction came after journalist Peerapon Anutarasoat of the Sure And Share Center in Bangkok raised questions to BuzzFeed News about the original report's accuracy and about its authors’ affiliations. BuzzFeed News contacted Elsevier as well as the journal’s editor on April 14 for comment on the questions raised by Anutarasoat.

In response, Thompson, the journal editor, wrote on April 15, "It's important to note that the letter doesn't say that the deceased caught COVID from a corpse, just that it's the first forensic practitioner to die."

In an email the next day, Sriwijitalai, the report’s coauthor, responded to a BuzzFeed News query to say a clarification was underway, and that the worker mentioned in the letter had not died, but had only been infected. The situation raised the “risk of death” among mortuary workers, he wrote.

The Thai health ministry and Thai embassy in Washington, DC, did not respond to requests for comment.

Scientists still know very little about whether the dead bodies of people infected with the coronavirus can be contagious. The CDC’s recommendations state, “People should consider not touching the body of someone who has died of COVID-19,” suggesting that those who handle dead bodies should wear personal protective equipment.

“This is really unusual, you don't publish a report that someone is dead and then say, no he isn't,” said Angelique Corthals, a professor of pathology at CUNY's John Jay College of Criminal Justice. “To be fair, this is a crisis and a lot of the review practices have become relaxed."

"The points about the importance of PPE in handling people who have died of coronavirus still stand, because we just don't have all the answers,” Corthals said.


Ontario Has Given Its Police Access To People's COVID-19 Test Data

A civil liberties group says the order violates the privacy of Ontarians.


Nathan Denette / The Canadian Press
A paramedic transports an elderly man to the emergency department at a hospital in Toronto.

Lauren Strapagiel BuzzFeed News Reporter
Posted on April 24, 2020

A civil liberties organization is raising the alarm after the province of Ontario began sharing COVID-19 test results with police and other organizations.

On April 6, Ontario officials announced that first responders in the province, including police, firefighters, and paramedics, would have access to a database that includes names, addresses, dates of birth, and whether a person had tested positive for COVID-19.

The Canadian Civil Liberties Association is calling it "an extraordinary invasion of privacy."

In a letter sent to Ontario Solicitor General Sylvia Jones, which was cosigned by other advocacy organizations, the CCLA said it was concerned about the legality of the measures.

"We have not found sufficient explanation of how providing this information to first responders, and police in particular, is useful, much less necessary, in responding to the present emergency," the letter said.



Canadian Civil Liberties Association@cancivlib

Providing personal health information directly to law enforcement is an extraordinary invasion of privacy. Such a measure should only be taken when clearly authorized by law and absolutely necessary given the particular circumstances.05:34 PM - 24 Apr 2020

Abby Deshman, a lawyer and director of the CCLA's criminal justice program, told BuzzFeed News, "Based on what we know about COVID-19 testing in this province, any database of test results will be a very partial picture of who’s carrying COVID-19, and it may also be out of date."

She added, "Personal health information is among the most private information that people have in their lives, and it is usually extremely tightly controlled and only shared with health providers and only with consent and only when absolutely necessary."

Deshman said the solicitor general has not yet replied to the letter, which was sent on Thursday.

A spokesperson for Jones told BuzzFeed News, "First responders put their lives on the line every day to protect Ontarians, and they are at great risk of being directly exposed to COVID-19 as they fulfill their frontline duties. That’s why it’s critical that we protect and support our frontline responders who are fighting to protect us from this virus every day."

The emergency order has a time limit and will expire when Ontario is no longer in a state of emergency.

"Strict protocols are enforced to limit access to this information, and it is used only to allow first responders to take appropriate safety precautions to protect themselves and the communities they serve," the spokesperson said.

Deshman, however, said there are no province-wide measures to ensure information is shared appropriately or to register complaints. She is also concerned about how the information-sharing may impact people of color and people with HIV who have a history of negative interactions with law enforcement.

The letter was cosigned by the CCLA, the HIV & AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario, the Black Legal Action Centre, and Aboriginal Legal Services.

###
Trump desperately tries to gaslight America as he faces 
humiliation from Lysol-gate


Published April 27, 2020 By Amanda Marcotte, Salon- Commentary


It’s gone mainstream in recent years, but the word “gaslighting” used to be an esoteric term from the world of psychology and domestic abuse counseling. The word refers to the 1944 film “Gaslight,” in which Ingrid Bergman plays a woman whose husband tries to drive her insane by hiding her belongings and otherwise manipulating her environment, and telling her that the changes she perceives are all in her head. Experts in domestic violence developed the term to describe the way that abusers in real life try to manipulate victims. The gaslighter works by denying reality, often when the facts are plain as day, with such conviction and repetition that the victim starts to question themselves and the evidence of their own senses


For instance, this might take the form of the abuser denying that he hit his victim or falsely claiming that she provoked it, and then browbeating her until she accepts the lie and even starts to wonder whether she imagined the whole thing.

Under Donald Trump’s administration, however, the term has ventured into politics. It’s become a way to talk about how Trump and his defenders won’t merely tell lies, but will stand by even the dumbest and most obvious lies, holding their ground until the defenders of reality simply give up fighting. This started from the very beginning of the administration, when Trump and his administration claimed his inauguration crowd was bigger than Barack Obama’s, and insisted on repeating that lie and intimidating government agencies into backing it up. Needless to say, this has continued throughout the coronavirus pandemic, dialed up to an extreme.

One might wonder why we need a term with such a complicated back story, when the word “lying” is right there for the taking. The reason is that Trump lies so frequently and in such varying ways that it’s useful to have a taxonomy of Trump lies to understand the various ways his lies work and how best, perhaps, to resist them.

With garden-variety lying, the liar tends to assume the target doesn’t know the truth and so can be made to accept the lie as if it were truth. Gaslighting differs dramatically in that the target actually knows what’s true. They experienced it, heard it or witnessed what really happened themselves. So what the gaslighter must do is convince the target to reject the evidence of their own eyes and ears.




Gaslighting is a useful term to explain what Trump did throughout this past weekend, in response to what we at Salon are calling “Lysol-gate,” in which our president went on national television and suggested that injecting household cleaners into people’s lungs might be a clever idea to fight the coronavirus that the medical profession clearly hadn’t thought of yet.

The reason doctors haven’t considered this idea is that it will kill the patient — and, I guess, also any virus lurking in his or her lungs. Trump is literally too stupid and lazy to know that fact, which was deeply embarrassing for him and anyone who supports him.

The problem Trump faces here is that he’s right there on video, marveling about “the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute” and speculating about an “injection inside, or almost a cleaning, because, you see, it gets in the lungs,” and pompously instructing the federal officials tasked with managing this crisis to investigate this possible treatment.

In the wake of widespread outrage, mockery and meme-creation, Trump turned to gaslighting. The goal is to deny the evidence of our own eyes and ears with such shamelessness and persistence that people start to question whether they heard what they heard, or at least give up trying to insist on the truth.

Trump’s first gaslighting attempt was to try to pretend he was pranking the press, telling a group of reporters the next day: “I was asking a question sarcastically to reporters like you just to see what would happen.”



This is a classic example of how gaslighting differs from plain old lying. Trump is insisting here that those of us who heard him suggest injecting disinfectants in people’s lungs have broken brains — if we didn’t detect the slightest hint of sarcasm in his tone, it’s because we are defective in some way, not because he wasn’t actually being sarcastic. The point is to force people who heard him perfectly well to defend their own ability to hear and see things, knowing full well that there’s no definitive, objective way for human beings to “prove” that they know the difference between sarcasm and not-sarcasm.

But at the same time Trump was implying that only crazy people with broken brains didn’t detect his supposedly obvious sarcasm, he also suggested that only crazy people with broken brains heard him say the word “lungs.” To repeat, he suggested an “injection inside, or almost a cleaning, because, you see, it gets in the lungs.”

“I do think that disinfectant on the hands could have a very good effect,” Trump told reporters later.

This is more gaslighting. It’s about trying to make people question whether, in their eagerness to criticize Trump, they misheard or misinterpreted him. (Never mind that rubbing bleach or Lysol or other household disinfectants on your hands is also a bad idea, since they will burn your skin.) His two arguments contradict each other — he couldn’t simultaneously have been messing with reporters and making an earnest argument about hand-washing — but in a sense, that’s the point. What the gaslighter wants to do is disorient the target so they begin to question their own sense of reality. Flooding them with a bunch of confusing and logically incoherent claims suits that goal.


Since then, Trump has been ranting incessantly on Twitter, throwing out a bunch of scattershot arguments over which government officials he addressed his disinfectant comments to, and whether or not he directly said that coronavirus was a “hoax.” He’s referring to the long-ago controversy following a rally in February where he said that fears about the coronavirus — which turned out to be fully justified — were a “hoax.” This was bizarre but entirely typical Trump hedging, indulged in precisely so he could get into quibbling arguments later about what, exactly, he had described as a hoax.

All these insignificant points of litigation — was he talking to Dr. Deborah Birx or Homeland Security Undersecretary Bill Bryan when he made his “injection” comment? Was he talking about the virus itself or merely the fear of the virus when he said “hoax”? — are also forms of gaslighting. It’s about seizing on minor but irrelevant details the target may have gotten wrong to imply that the target’s sense of reality is irrevocably damaged and therefore they can’t be trusted to understand anything at all.

An abuser in a marriage, for instance, might use the fact that his wife once forgot that his favorite shirt is purple, not red, to argue that she is too stupid and crazy to be trusted when she says that he hit her or that he won’t let her see her friends. Trump is pulling the same trick, using minor confusion over the details of that specific press conference as “evidence” that people didn’t hear him correctly when they heard him suggest injecting disinfectants into people’s lungs.




Because gaslighting works differently than garden-variety lying, it requires a different response. With garde- variety lying, it’s often just a matter of supplying a fact check. But gaslighters put the person who is being lied to on the defensive, and try to make the debate over whether the target is mentally stable enough to be trusted, not the content of the gaslighter’s lies. Trump wants the debate to be about what’s in our heads, which is ultimately insubstantial and unprovable, not what the entire world heard him saying with his own mouth.

Defeating gaslighting often requires more of a meta-response. Rolling the tape over and over to confirm that we all heard Trump say the words he actually said certainly helps, but it’s not enough. It’s important to resist getting mired in line-by-line debates over whether people who are horrified by Trump’s disinfectant comments got the color of his tie right. Instead, we should call out these kinds of diversionary tactics, which are meant to force us into a debate about whether our minds are broken and whether we can literally perceive anything at all. That’s not the issue. The issue is that our president is a lazy, arrogant moron who went on TV and spewed fatuous bullshit about how maybe doctors should look into shooting up patients with poisonous chemicals because, y’know, it’s worth a shot.


Thumbnail