Saturday, January 08, 2022

‘Gone by 2040’: Why some religions DENOMINATIONS are declining in Canada faster than ever

Ashleigh Stewart

LONG READ

It’s Advent Sunday and snow is falling thick and fast outside the front doors of the soaring, neo-Gothic bell tower of the Metropolitan United Church in downtown Toronto.

A tiny crowd huddles around a black Weber grill, emitting brief puffs of smoke as a crackling fire battles the elements.

“Come, gather around the holy barbecue,” Reverend Jason Meyers jokes.

It’s a modern scene amid very modern challenges facing religious institutions in Canada.

Religiosity in Canada is at an all-time low, with recently released data from Statistics Canada showing only 68 per cent of Canadians 15 or older now report having a religious affiliation. It’s the first time that number has dipped below 70 per cent since StatCan began tracking the data in 1985.

In response, Global News has spent the past two months speaking to members of religious communities across the country and looking at historical data to determine why this is happening. This is part one of that series.

It's important to note that this decline is not across the board; the number of Muslims, Sikhs, Buddhists and Hindus is increasing, and StatCan predicts the number of Canadians reporting a non-Christian religious affiliation could double by the year 2036.

Christianity, however, is in sharp decline. In 2011, 67.3 per cent (about 22.1 million people) of Canadians said they were affiliated with a Christian religion. In 2019, that number had dropped to 63.2 per cent. Catholicism, Canada’s largest denomination, now accounts for 32 per cent of Canadians over 15, down from 46.9 per cent in 1996.

The decline is even more precarious for Canada’s United and Anglican churches.

Video: How has religion’s role changed over the years for Canadians?

In 2021, the first Sunday in Advent — the season that commemorates Christmas, or the birth of Jesus Christ — has fallen on Toronto’s first snow day, Nov. 28.

Just six people have come to congregate around the Weber grill, for Metropolitan’s Taddle Creek Wild Church, a more modern and nature-based service than the traditional Sunday service.

Being experimental, it tends to attract smaller numbers than the standard Sunday service held an hour earlier. But that one too had barely 50 people in attendance; two to three people per pew scattered across a cavernous church.

But United members have been decreasing for decades, far before a snowstorm and a global pandemic.

United, the country’s second-largest Canadian Christian denomination, accounted for 14.6 per cent of Canadians in 1985. In 1996, that number had declined to 9.7 per cent and to just 3.8 per cent in 2019. Islam, considered a minority religion, now sits at 3.7 per cent.

Nowadays, Meyers says, on average, United loses one church per week across Canada and he expects that to accelerate.


He acknowledges that many people are brought up religious but lose interest, but says some come back of their own volition later in life. Meyers did so himself, turning to the church in his 30s after the breakdown of his marriage.

It’s for these reasons that he says, despite the membership decline, he’s optimistic United will not die out completely.

“There will be fewer churches and yet, the ones that are able to build belonging across lines of difference — whether that is racial or economic, or like literal space, or somewhere here, somewhere online — they're the ones that are going to stay and grow.”

It seems optimistic after a service of 50 people in a church built to house 2,000. But Meyers believes the pandemic has strengthened many Christians’ resolve.

“The deep desire for connection has not gone away. It has accelerated, I would say, and in a traditional church like this, or small group gatherings, we are hardwired for community. We're hardwired for spirituality,” Meyers says.

“There’s more of a yearning, and people are looking for hope.”

But it’s hard to ignore the demographics of the congregation — the vast majority of whom have grey hair.

Statistics Canada data confirms the generational gap, finding that religious affiliation was at 85 per cent among older Canadians born between 1940 and 1959, compared with 32 per cent for those born between 1980 and 1999.


Gunn Wongsuwan, 28, knows, at his age, he’s in the minority as a regular Metropolitan churchgoer. The Toronto resident was brought up Roman Catholic but stopped attending church as a teenager. When he returned, in his late teens while living in Scotland, his friends thought he was “crazy.”

Video: United Church explains affordable housing initiative across B.C.

“I went back into church looking for structure, and then just realized there was a lot more to it than that. There's a whole side of wanting to be still for a bit, to think on the eternal, to appreciate the art and the music and to contemplate the whole narrative,” Wongsuwan says. He joined Metropolitan upon moving back to Canada.

When asked his views on the role religion plays in 2021, given the changing times, Wongsuwan says perhaps now it is more important than ever.

“Aristotle said that man is a political animal. I think we're also religious animals. A lot of us try to see meaning, to have a sense of spirituality. We want order, we want knowledge, and I think we have this sort of longing to be something that's bigger than ourselves.”

Statistics Canada, however, also found that religion was becoming less important for Canadians on the whole. Those who reported religious or spiritual beliefs were "somewhat important" or "very important" to their lives was 54 per cent in 2019. In the mid-2000s, it was around 70 per cent.

Anglicanism shares a similarly bleak outlook. StatCan data shows that in 1986, 10.4 per cent of all Canadians were Anglican. That dropped to 7.0 per cent in 1996 and to 3.8 per cent in 2019.

That year, Neil Elliot, the Anglican Church of Canada's statistics and research officer, produced a report intended to show church elders what this would mean for its future.

After a membership decline between 1961 and 2001 of 50 per cent, and a similar decline between 1991 and 2015, Elliot projected the Anglican Church would run out of members completely by 2040.

Baptisms and confirmations had showed churches were “not drawing in substantial quantities of new members” and figures for funerals showed “we are not just losing members, we are losing the opportunities to draw in members, we are losing contacts with our communities.”

“These figures are therefore arguments for an increasing rate of decline in the next decade,” the report said, also stating that it was “unlikely that we are going to turn it around in the next 20 years.”

Two years later, Elliot’s outlook has changed somewhat. The pandemic had brought about an impetus for change, he says, but it remains to be seen if that will result in an influx of new members.

Video: Anglican church could run out of members by 2040: Researcher

He says modern culture has been “pushing people away from the church” for decades.

“The idea of modernity, which is based on science, is somehow intrinsically against religion. There is a view that is out there, not one that I agree with, that science and religion can't mix,” he says.

Elliot says the Anglican Church must adapt to survive. He says that his role is to try to drill this into the minds of clergy across Canada.

“I think of it very much like climate change, and people's responses to climate change,” Elliot says.

“There's three main responses to climate change: there's denial … then there's people who say we can stop it. And then there's people who say, we can adapt…that's what I'm trying to get us to do within the Anglican Church, it's how do we adapt to it?”

Pivoting to more modern ways of delivering church services was crucial for future survival, he says, and to ensure active engagement. He’d done so for his own parish, St Andrew and St George in Kootenay. He now builds bulletin-style services, complete with YouTube videos.

Not only is there a decline in those who consider themselves religious in Canada, but participation in religious activities is also on the decline.

The number of people who answered “not at all” to the question of frequency of attending group religious activities in the StatCan survey, was an overwhelming 53 per cent. Only 23 per cent of Canadians said they attend group activities at least once a month. Between 2000 and 2009, that figure was around 30 per cent.


However, some denominations were well above this average — mostly more evangelical groups. Jehovah’s Witnesses (86 per cent) reported the highest participation rates.

Canadian Jehovah’s Witnesses spokesman James Dumeignil says the number of Jehovah’s Witnesses is increasing year-over-year — with 3,000 more members in 2021 than in 2020. StatCan data, however, shows a decline in Canadian membership to 137,775 from 168,370 in 1991.


Dumeignil says participation rates are so high because their religion — which differentiates itself in its belief in only one God, Jehovah, rather than the Holy Trinity (the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit) of Christianity — underpins their entire lives.

That, and for the religion’s well-known, often relentless, advocacy of itself, through door-knocking and outreach programmes. But Dumeignil says that only plays a small role in persuading people to attend meetings, and people are more likely to be drawn in by its optimistic outlook and a mantra that “it’s inevitable that things will improve.”

Some Christian congregations say they are also bucking these trends. A spokesperson for the Archdiocese of Toronto, home to Catholics in the GTA, says while city locations were suffering, churches in smaller towns and communities continued to pull in big numbers.

Father Liborio Amaral, pastor of St. Mary’s in Brampton, a Catholic church, says it is rare for his 800-capacity church to be less than 75 per cent full on a Sunday. Amaral thinks, anecdotally, that attendance is increasing — especially in younger people.

“Normally now, when you see a line-up of people going to confession, they’re younger people — in their teens or early 20s. Within the last 10 years or so, something is happening and the youth are realizing that they need God. I think it’s about the shallowness and emptiness in sometimes what people think will bring them joy — the job, the career, the house, the car. So they're looking at the spiritual part of their life,” he says.

“When you’re younger, you are carrying your parents' faith. But they get to a certain age and they say, ‘It’s no longer my parents' faith. It has to be mine.’”

The United and Anglican churches and Judaism report the lowest numbers of those who engage in religious activity at least once per month — at 19 per cent, 19 per cent and 24 per cent, respectively.

Judaism has unique challenges. For example, Shabbat (Judaism’s day of rest, observed from sunset on Friday to nightfall Saturday) is when many school sports are played, prompting a choice between religion and extracurricular activities from a young age.

“The society we live in discourages adherence to religious precepts,” says Stan Grossman, chair of the ritual committee for the Beth Sholom synagogue in Toronto.

Read more:

Canadian Jewish community rallies to help Saskatoon celebrate Passover

The proportion of Jews in Canada has fallen steadily over the years. In 1985, 1.6 per cent of Canadians were Jewish, according to StatsCan. That number fell to 1.1 per cent in 1996 and in 2019 is about 0.8 per cent.

For the non-Orthodox community, participation in weekly and daily services pre-COVID had been “somewhat disappearing,” Grossman says.

“We've been impacted just across the board as this whole generation has grown. And religion has not become a way of life for this generation.”

Five years ago, a Shabbat service would have pulled in 150 to 200 people, Grossman says. At a service in early December, during Chanukah, about 80 well-dressed people are scattered around the expansive Beth Sholom synagogue. But about half of them are not members — they’re friends and family of a young girl celebrating her Bat Mitzvah.

Cantor Eric Moses addresses the congregation as he would a full congregation — tearfully recounting his own journey as the only Jew at his school in Sudbury, desperately trying to fit in.

“I was the boy who knew all the Christmas songs by heart, who left milk and cookies out for Santa, but Santa never came.”

Video: Jewish community happy to celebrate Hanukkah together again

Speaking after the service, Grossman says Moses’ story is typical of many. But these days, young Jewish children were given a choice about going to the synagogue, when that choice didn’t exist for previous generations.

“As a next generation, I'm guilty, because I didn't do to my children the same thing that my parents did to me,” Grossman says.

Beth Sholom had been working on youth outreach programmes to get their attendance up. But Grossman accepts that declining membership and attendance shouldn’t directly translate to a decline in Jews in Canada.

“You don’t have to be religious to be Jewish,” he says.

Sarah Wilkins-Laflamme, who teaches sociology at the University of Waterloo, has been tracking changes to Canada’s religious landscape for years. However, she subverts the question of decline: “I say, ‘Why were so many people involved with Christianity?’ rather than saying, ‘Why are so few involved now?’"

Wilkins-Laflamme says Western Christianity in Canada was not receiving an influx of new immigrants to boost their rolls, unlike Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism and Sikhism.

A societal shift was also propelling Canada toward secularization, in a world where daily life no longer “revolves around the church.”

“There's a series of factors at play. We're just not in the same kind of society we were at the end of the 19th century, or start of the 20th century, when a Christian church went with a set of other social factors. So you think back to the 19th century, the hub of social life was the village and in the centre of the village was a church or multiple churches," she says.

"We've shifted to a different society where there are alternatives. There's alternatives in terms of who's providing the social services, schools, health, education and entertainment.”

The past few decades had been about “consolidating” an “unsustainable number of churches” across the country, she says.

“There were a lot of churches in downtown Toronto. A lot of those have sold and become condos or high-end restaurants. It tells you something about our society, what these places are becoming. We're desperate for housing and we’re not desperate for places of worship.”

The lack of affiliation had been most pronounced in younger age groups, due to how people are being brought up, Wilkins-Laflamme says.

However, the religions that have remained are “so much more diverse,” she says. Questions around exclusivity to one religion will now need to be addressed, where people can report being part of more than one, “like a multi-choice answer,” she says.

“We're currently in a society that highly values things like personal choice … where you're finding your own way rather than relying on a religious leader or an institution,” she says.

“So will the United/ Anglican Church completely die out? Probably not there'll be some form leftover but it'll be quite small. They're going to be a small minority.”
In many states, workers still earn only $7.25 an hour.

If we want to fix the 'labor shortage,' it should start with raising wages.

insider@insider.com (Paul Constant) 
© Provided by Business Insider Fast food workers and activists demonstrate outside McDonald's downtown flagship restaurant on July 31, 2014 in Chicago, Illinois. Scott Olson/Getty Images

Paul Constant is a wr
iter at Civic Ventures and the cohost of the "Pitchfork Economics" podcast.

Amid the ongoing labor crisis, Constant says raising the minimum wage could be a key solution.

Raising wages has proven good for workers and business, yet many states are stuck at the $7.25 federal minimum.

This year will mark the 10-year anniversary of the first step toward a $15 minimum wage. Over the last decade, the Fight for $15 has been a tremendous success. On January 1, 56 cities, counties, and states around the US increased their minimum wage, with more than half of those jurisdictions reaching or exceeding $15 per hour.

It's difficult to remember now, but the Fight for $15, which gained momentum with votes to raise the wages of airport workers in the small city of SeaTac just outside Seattle, was never a foregone conclusion.

Pitchfork Economics host Nick Hanauer's early support of the Fight for $15 was called "near insane" in Forbes. Opponents threatened that raising the wage to $15 would be catastrophic — one restaurateur predicted that a quarter of the restaurants in Seattle would close and a seafood market owner warned of the wage "devastating" employers, causing small businesses to automate their entire workforce or even move to Texas in response.

Last week, the minimum wage in Seattle reached $17.27 per hour, while the minimum wage in Washington state increased to $14.49, and none of those threats have come true. Researchers closely examined every step of Seattle's minimum-wage increase and found in 2016 that both worker wages and the number of hours worked had increased. Studies in 2017 found that Seattle's adoption of the $15 minimum wage had "near zero" impact on restaurant employment. And a 2019 study found that prices at restaurants and grocery stores didn't increase due to the higher minimum wage.

In the years since Seattle's adoption of the $15 minimum wage, the body of minimum-wage research continues to grow, with studies finding that raising the wage "can play a critical role in reducing racial economic disparities," that it would combat poverty and job loss in low-wage areas, and that raising the minimum wage increases tax revenue. Last year, the Nobel Prize for economics was given to David Card, Joshua Angrist, and Guido Imbens for their extensive work disproving the trickle-down threat that raising the minimum wage kills jobs.

So to say it as plainly as possible: Seattle's move to raise the minimum wage to $15 was good for workers, good for businesses, and good for consumers. Despite the trickle-down threats and warnings that jobs would be killed and businesses would shutter, the opposite is true: When businesses pay workers more money, those workers spend that money on local businesses, which hire more workers to meet increased consumer demand.

Leaders around the country paid close attention to Seattle and saw that the sky didn't fall. Now dozens of other cities, counties, and states around the country are raising their minimum wage to $15 and beyond. And more minimum-wage increases are just over the horizon: Last year the Biden Administration passed legislation that will raise the minimum wage for some 327,000 federal contract workers to $15 on January 30.

But despite this progress, the federal minimum wage is still stalled at $7.25 per hour for non-tipped employees and $2.13 per hour for tipped employees. The Economic Policy Institute recently found that the $7.25 federal minimum wage is worth 21% less today than it was worth when established in 2009.

This week, the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Study found that an all-time record of 4.5 million Americans quit their jobs in November, even while 6.7 million workers were hired in the same month — and that many of those quits and hires were in the low-paying hospitality sector.

The numbers indicate that many workers are leaving low-paying jobs for better-paying positions in the same sector, suggesting that the "labor shortage" is really a wage shortage. Raising the minimum wage then would likely be an effective economic policy to combat the pandemic-era labor crisis, as raising the wage has been shown to encourage employee retention and create a more attentive, productive workforce.

A quarter of a million workers in states that adhere to the $7.25 minimum wage — including Alabama, Idaho, Kansas, Utah, and Texas — will likely never see their paychecks increase without Congressional intervention through an increase in the federal wage. Their shrinking consumer demand is holding back the entire American economy. It's time for all of America to enjoy the economic growth and prosperity that dozens of states and cities have seen in the aftermath of the Fight for $15. In 2022, America desperately deserves a raise.
Neoliberalism on life support?

As the Mont Pelerin Society approaches its 75th anniversary this year, socialists and trade unionists need to start thinking about how to bring an end to the dead hand of free-market economics, says DOUG NICHOLLS


Conservative leader Margaret Thatcher and deputy leader William Whitelaw during a Conservative Group for Europe Press conference at the Tory Central Office

APRIL this year marks the 75th anniversary of the first meeting of the Mont Pelerin Society. This was convened by the infamous economist Friedrich von Hayek, who wanted to bring together a range of thinkers to oppose the advance of socialism and social democracy.

Few will recognise any names of members of this illustrious gang, except perhaps its founder Hayek or Milton Friedman, Thatcher’s economic butler-in-chief.

But the global elites know them well and have honoured at least nine of them with Nobel prizes in economics.

University economics departments throughout the world knelt at their altar and created a new orthodoxy of free-market fetishism and, in the name of liberalism and tolerance, purged vaguely Keynesian, let alone Marxist, academic from their ranks.

Neoliberal professors gathered in their covens, stirring up potions so hallucinogenic students no longer needed to be hippies. They could become stock market traders instead.

The free market in economic ideas became a monopoly of neoliberalism unregulated by any monopolies and mergers commission.

Yet the funny thing was that there was nothing really new about it. It represented capitalism, mainly in the West, and mainly as embodied by Reagan and Thatcher, whiffed off that they had lost so much and seeking to get revenge.

It was classical liberalism resurrecting itself in the post-war period when communism and various forms of socialism were on the rise.

It was a time of a new settlement; public ownership, planning, state intervention, the welfare state, the development of free healthcare systems in many countries and of the liberation from colonial domination in many others.

This was all a bit too much for the liberals. Things were freeing up, and liberals hate freedom.

The world was becoming a testament to the failure of the liberal capitalism they had espoused. So they thought in the light of the failure, it was best to have another go and repeat their mistakes even more spectacularly next time.

And of course when they did fail in 2008, they went running to governments to bail them out.

Neoliberalism was the invention of the exhausted and defeated and clapped-out capitalists. Their mission was nothing less than dismantling the progressive post-war settlement and all that the people had fought for and were building up to socialise economic endeavour.

And in this, despite their decrepitude and bankruptcy, they were remarkably successful.

You might say that slash-and-burn, voodoo economics is easy to launch against the people — and in one sense it is. You can understand how the top 1 per cent would adore it, but one of the big problems was that there was insufficiently deep and informed intellectual opposition to it. Economics, like history and politics, disappeared from the trade union education agenda.

The neoliberals took the long view right from their very first meeting in 1947. No instant quick-fix big bang, no sudden counter-revolutionary coup after Chile, which had been their first experiment.

They chipped away. Slowly but surely they sidled up to leading politicians throughout the world and persuaded them that only a small state and a big free market and loadsamoney in very few pockets could save mankind. Wealth, they said, would trickle down — the 99 per cent would benefit!

Ironically, they had to use the state to introduce a new authoritarianism and particularly aim state forces and legislation against the “tyranny” of trade unionism and publicly owned services and utilities.

The value of wages in relation to gross domestic product was systematically reduced by around 10 per cent.

A better wheeze for them than reversing every bit of progressive reform in every country was to find means whereby the national, regulatory parliaments of independent nations could be overridden by supranational entities like, for example, the European Union or the International Monetary Fund.

And the results of all of their conniving and lectures, Nobel prizes and seminars, ever-so-clever papers and policy proposals?

Well, we all know that — from profit burning up the planet, to private energy companies freezing pensioners in winter, from foodbanks to shadow banks concentrating wealth taken from the people in so few hands, the world seems sometimes actually run by a few arch-megalomaniacs.

If someone was to set up a learned institution to train burglars there would be an outcry. But this is what the world has tolerated in the Mont Pelerin Society and its close cousin, the Bilderberg Group, whose meetings even some deluded British trade unionists have attended.

There are many brilliant books and videos on how the neoliberal agenda has influenced world developments and key politicians. The Labour Party under Tony Blair swallowed the elixir of extremism and it looks as though Keir Starmer might be keen too.

But nothing lasts for ever. Yesterday’s gurus are tomorrow’s cranks.

The only way Covid has been tackled has been through state intervention, big government, planning, government expenditure, through public service providers organising clinical and preventative measures, and researching developments, modelling statistics and investing public funds into vaccine development.

Covid-19 has been therefore been curtailed in capitalist countries by adopting socialist measures of social protection and improvement, central co-ordination and planning.

Where countries would describe themselves as taking an overt socialist or communist path, Covid has been very effectively managed, in great contrast to capitalist nations.

No wonder the Mont Pelerin Society is looking forward to its conference this year in Oslo in October to fire a few volts into its life support machine.

The world’s gone mad and had to start looking after people again and invest in science and technology and plan vaccination programmes, so Frankenstein must, the Society thinks, be jolted into life – and vaccine production and circulation must be left to its second-hand car-dealing mates.

But the most important gatherings this year will be all those celebrating and discussing the policies needed to replace the dead hand of neoliberalism.

The General Federation of Trade Unions and our friends will be meeting, not in Switzerland, but closer to home where workers gather, to popularise a new economics for the people.

2022 is the year to begin the end of neoliberal economics, and we should not be squeamish about its demise.

We will this year proudly dust off and raise the banner of our Alternative Economic Strategy again and intensify our education programmes to debunk the prevailing murderous and pathetic attempts at economics.

Doug Nicholls is general secretary of the GFTU.
Journalist for Montreal online radio station killed on the job in Haiti
By Staff The Canadian Press
Posted January 7, 2022 

Haiti’s Prime Minister Ariel Henry was rushed to safety as gunmen opened fire at an event celebrating the country’s independence. Video shows the prime minister and his entourage scrambling for cover outside the event, which marked the 218th anniversary of Haiti’s independence.

A Montreal-based online radio station says one of its journalists was killed on the job in Haiti on Thursday.

Radio Ecoute FM says John Wesley Amady, 32, was about to conduct an interview with a member of an armed group when he was shot and killed.

READ MORE: Haiti’s new prime minister survives weekend assassination attempt, office says


Station CEO Francky Attis said Fridayin an interview that the attack, which also killed another journalist, took place in the Laboule 12 area, near the capital Port-au-Prince.

He says Amady was a kind man who was able to cover stories in dangerous areas that other journalists couldn’t.

READ MORE:  ‘The state doesn’t exist’: Gang violence in Haiti keeps aid at bay


Attis says he is calling for justice for Amady, who worked in Haiti for the radio station since 2018.

The attack was condemned by media advocacy group Reporters Without Borders, which identified the other slain journalist at Wilguens Louissaint.
Mexico invites Chilean president-elect to visit, eyeing "strategic alliance"

Thu, 6 January 2022

Chile's outgoing President Sebastian Pinera meets with President-elect Gabriel Boric, in Santiago
In this article:


MEXICO CITY (Reuters) -Mexico's government said on Thursday it had invited Chilean President-elect Gabriel Boric to visit, as the two countries vowed to forge a "strategic alliance" once the new leader takes office.

Mexican Foreign Minister Marcelo Ebrard spoke in a video news conference from Chile after meeting with Boric, a leftist who last month was voted in as Chile's youngest-ever democratically elected president.

Mexico's foreign ministry issued a statement saying Ebrard and Boric agreed that the two countries would establish the strategic alliance once Boric assumes power in March.

The partnership will seek to work with other progressive countries in the region to promote "a common voice to face challenges in the international arena," the ministry said.

When asked if the two had discussed lithium mining during talks in Chile, Ebrard said the topic did not come up, but was likely to do so in future as an area of common agreement.

"The business of lithium is sure to be one of the priorities on the shared agenda between Chile and Mexico," he said.

Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, a leftist resource nationalist, is seeking to reserve lithium extraction for the government and bar private developers from future concessions.

(Reporting by Raul Cortes; Writing by Daina Beth SolomonEditing by Dave Graham and Richard Chang)

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M

Keurig Canada fined $3 million for misleading claims over coffee pod recycling

K-Cups aren't widely accepted for recycling in any province

except Quebec and B.C.

The Competition Bureau says Keurig Canada will pay a $3 million penalty for making false or misleading claims that its single-use K-Cup pods can be recycled. (Bryan Bedder/Getty Images for New York Magazine)

The Competition Bureau says Keurig Canada will pay a $3 million penalty for making false or misleading claims that its single-use K-Cup pods can be recycled.

In a statement Thursday, the bureau says the company voluntarily reached an agreement that will include the fine plus an $800,000 donation to an environmental charity and $85,000 in Competition Bureau expenses for the case.

Keurig reportedly came to an agreement to a settle a class-action suit in the United States over the same issue last month, though the details of that settlement are not yet public.

The company was investigated by the Competition Bureau for claims its single-use plastic beverage pods could be recycled if consumers peeled off the metallic lid and emptied out any contents like coffee grounds.

But the bureau said the K-Cups aren't widely accepted for recycling in any province except Quebec and British Columbia and those instructions don't go far enough for many cities that might accept them in a recycling program.

Ordered to change packaging, inform subscribers

In addition to the financial penalties, Keurig Canada has to change its packaging, publish notices about the changes on its websites, social media and in local and national media outlets, as well as include the information in packaging for new Keurig brewing machines and send an email to subscribers.

"Portraying products or services as having more environmental benefits than they truly have is an illegal practice in Canada," Commissioner of Competition Matthew Boswell said in a statement.

"False or misleading claims by businesses to promote 'greener' products harm consumers who are unable to make informed purchasing decisions, as well as competition and businesses who actually offer products with a lower environmental impact."

K-Cups not accepted by many recycling programs

Cynthia Shanks, senior director for communications and sustainability at Keurig Canada, said in an emailed statement that three years ago, Keurig switched its pods to use the type of plastic that is most commonly accepted by Canadian recycling programs.

But she said many still do not accept K-Cups.

"As we continue working with municipalities and the recycling industry to increase K-Cup pod recycling acceptance, we've been evolving our communications with consumers to share that the pods are recyclable in select communities and remind them of the appropriate steps to recycle," Shanks said.

"The agreement with the Competition Bureau of Canada will further enhance our communications, reminding consumers to verify whether K-Cup pods are accepted in their municipality's recycling program and, if so, any additional steps that may be necessary to prepare the pods for recycling."

The Competition Act prohibits companies from making false or misleading claims about their products, including environmental claims. Five years ago, the Competition Bureau issued a warning to companies that "greenwashing" their products is illegal in Canada.

"The Competition Act takes aim at environmental claims that are vague, non-specific, incomplete, or irrelevant and that cannot be supported through verifiable test methods," the 2017 statement reads.

Road Salt Works. But It’s Also Bad for the Environment.

The chemical is effective at keeping roads free of snow and ice, but it also has damaging consequences, according to a growing body of research.


A salt and plow truck sat abandoned after sliding off the road in icy conditions in 
Stafford County, Va., this week
.Credit...Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


By Jenny Gross
Jan. 7, 2022

As snowstorms sweep the East Coast of the United States this week, transportation officials have deployed a go-to solution for keeping winter roads clear: salt.

But while pouring tons of salt on roads makes winter driving safer, it also has damaging environmental and health consequences, according to a growing body of research.

As snow and ice melt on roads, the salt washes into soil, lakes and streams, in some cases contaminating drinking water reservoirs and wells. It has killed or endangered wildlife in freshwater ecosystems, with high chloride levels toxic to fish, bugs and amphibians, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.

“It’s an issue that requires attention now,” said Bill Hintz, an assistant professor in the environmental sciences department at the University of Toledo and the lead author of a recent research review published in the journal Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

“There’s plenty of scientific evidence to suggest that freshwater ecosystems are being contaminated by salt from the use of things like road salt beyond the concentration which is safe for freshwater organisms and for human consumption,” Dr. Hintz said.
Road salt is an environmental pollutant.

Salt has been used to de-ice roads in the United States since the 1930s, and its use across the country has tripled in the past 50 years, Dr. Hintz said. More than 20 million metric tons of salt are poured on U.S. roads each winter, according to an estimate by the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies in New York, and the environmental costs are growing.

Climate Fwd A new administration, an ongoing climate emergency — and a ton of news. Our newsletter will help you stay on top of it. Get it sent to your inbox.

Still, little has been done to address the environmental impact of road salt because it is cheap and effective, said Victoria Kelly, the environmental programming manager at the Cary Institute. By lowering the freezing temperature of water, salt prevents snow from turning to ice and melts ice that is already there.

Road salt is made from sodium chloride, the same chemical found in table salt. Of all salt consumed in the United States, about 43 percent is used for highway de-icing, according to the U.S. Geological Survey in 2020.

The consequences of insufficiently salting roads were seen this week, when hundreds of drivers were stranded by a snowstorm on Interstate 95 in Virginia. Officials said the storm began with rain, which washed away road salt and made it difficult to keep roads clear. More snow fell in the Mid-Atlantic States and the Northeast on Friday.

But environmentalists say the problems associated with road salt are getting harder to ignore. Ms. Kelly said the accumulation of salt in drinking water reservoirs in some places was harming people on low-sodium diets.

A city worker threw salt from a truck in New York City last year.
Credit...Kathy Willens/Associated Press

A 2018 study of wells in Dutchess County, N.Y., found that sodium concentration in wells reached levels as high as 860 milligrams per liter — much higher than the federal and state recommendation that levels not exceed 20 milligrams per liter for people on very low-sodium diets and 270 milligrams per liter for people on moderately restricted sodium diets.

A separate 2018 study in the journal Environmental Science and Technology showed that 24 percent of private drinking wells in New York were contaminated with salt that had been used on roads. About 15 percent of people in the United States get their water from private ground wells, while the rest rely on community water systems, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

More counties and states are rethinking the amount of salt they use because of the associated costs. Last month, Gov. Kathy Hochul of New York announced appointments to the Adirondack Road Salt Reduction Task Force, established to review road-salt contamination.

“I have no doubt that this group of individuals will work tirelessly to protect our state from the adverse effects of road salt,” Ms. Hochul said. “We look forward to seeing this group finally convene and make progress in preventing further pollution to our waterways and our environment.”

There are consequences for wildlife, too. Dr. Hintz said his review showed that elevated salinity levels in freshwater ecosystems had already caused a reduction in the abundance and growth of freshwater organisms and a reduction in their reproduction outputs.

Road salt also corrodes vehicles and bridges, causing $5 billion in annual repairs in the United States, according to an estimate by the Environmental Protection Agency. AAA suggests drivers wash and clean their vehicles regularly during winter to help offset the effects of road salt and to limit driving when salt and other de-icing chemicals are at their highest concentrations.

In Britain, the Salt Association said that salt was the cheapest form of de-icing material and that it had a low environmental impact when used responsibly. “As with all highway maintenance activities, there are environmental implications from winter road maintenance,” the organization said in a statement. “Highways depots, spreading vehicles and the de-icing agent all contribute, but with good management, this burden can be minimized.”

Alternative methods can mitigate the damage.


While there is not a perfect solution to the issue, there are alternatives that can significantly reduce salt usage without compromising driver safety.

One method involves treating roads before storms with a salt brine solution, which can lead to a 75 percent reduction in the amount of salt used while keeping roads just as safe, according to the Cary Institute. Building better salt storage sites can also minimize waste.

Some counties, like Jefferson County, Wis., have already made changes. Bill Kern, the county’s highway commissioner, said switching to a brine solution had enabled the county to cut its salt use by up to 60 percent since 2018 without an increase in the number of accidents. By using less salt, the county has reduced its overall cost for winter maintenance of state and county highways by 20 percent since 2018, saving about $1.6 million, Mr. Kern said.

Over the past decade, some states, including Rhode Island, have passed legislation aimed to reduce their use of road salt and have increasingly applied a brine solution to roads in winter, but environmentalists say more needs to be done.

While engineers have developed better alternatives, they have not been widely implemented in part because they require upfront costs for purchasing equipment, Ms. Kelly said.

“It’ll save us money, and it’ll help to save our freshwater,” she said, while adding that “because of that legacy effect, it’s going to take a really long time to see the impact of the steps we take.”

U.S. Ramps Up Battery Production With 13 New Gigafactories

 

  • 13 new battery cell gigafactories are expected to come online in the U.S. by 2025.
  • The next decade will be defined by a massive increase in utility-scale storage
  • GM, Ford, Tesla, SK Innovations and LG Energy Solutions are among the builders of new gigafactories

 

The energy transition is driving the next commodity supercycle, with immense prospects for technology manufacturers, energy traders, and investors. Indeed, new energy research provider BloombergNEF estimates that the global transition will require ~$173 trillion in energy supply and infrastructure investment over the next three decades, with renewable energy expected to provide 85% of our energy needs by 2050.

The transition from ICEs to EVs has become a focal point of the global electrification drive. In 2020, global sales of EVs increased a robust 39% year on year to 3.1 million units, an impressive feat right in the midst of a major health crisis. Bloomberg New Energy Finance(BNEF), however, says 2021 is "yet another record year for EV sales globally," with an estimated 5.6 million units sold, good for 83% Y/Y growth and a 168% increase over 2019 sales. BNEF has forecast that annual EV sales will approach 30 million units globally by 2030.

That means that the world will need a massive ramp up in electric battery production. Indeed, DOE says the worldwide lithium battery market is expected to grow by a factor of 5 to 10 in the next decade.

Luckily, the United States appears to be up to the task. 

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, 13 new battery cell gigafactories are expected to come online in the U.S. by 2025.

Apart from Tesla Inc.'s (NASDAQ:TSLA) new 'Gigafactory Texas' in AustinFord Motors (NYSEF) has lined up three gigafactories; one in Northeast of Memphis, TN, and two in Central KY, with the latter two being a joint venture between the company and South Korea's energy holding conglomerate SK Innovations.

General Motors (NYSE:GM) plans to build no less than four gigafactories, with one being a JV with LG Chem (OTCPK:LGCLF) and the other three being JVs with LG Energy Solution (LGES). LGES is one of the world's top electric vehicle battery makers, supplying the likes of Tesla and General Motors. LG Energy Solution has applied for preliminary approval of an IPO that publication IFR says could fetch $10 billion-$12 billion, easily South Korea's biggest-ever listing. LGES has announced plans to invest more than $4.5 billion in its U.S. battery plant by 2025.

Meanwhile, SK Innovations plans to build two battery factories in Northeast of Atlanta, GA; Stellantis N.V. (NYSE:STLA) is teaming up with LG Energy Solution and Samsung SDI to build two factories in yet to be determined locations while Toyota Motor Corp. (NYSE:TM) and Volkswagen (OTCPK:VWAGY) plan to build a gigafactory apiece in Southeast of Greensboro, NC, and Chattanooga, TN, respectively.

Annual Sales of Passenger EVs (Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) and Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs))

Global Lithium-ion EV Battery Demand Projections

Source: U.S. Energy Department

Battery Investments

A host of energy experts, including the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), UBSBloombergNEF, S&P Market IntelligenceWood Mackenzie and others are extremely bullish about the prospects of the battery storage industry-- both over the near-and long-term--as the clean energy drive gains huge momentum.

At the center of our green energy drive are solar and wind power, both of which are expected to contribute nearly half of the global power mix by 2050 as per Bloomberg New Energy Finance. The intermittent nature of these renewable sources, however, means that large-scale storage is absolutely critical if the world is to successfully shift away from high dependence on fossil fuels.

The surge in lithium-ion battery production since 2010 can be chalked up to huge improvements in the technology from a cost and performance standpoint. 

Over the past decade, an 85% decline in prices fueled a revolution in lithium-ion battery technology, making electric vehicles and large-scale commercial battery deployments a reality for the first time in history.

The next decade will be defined by a massive increase in utility-scale storage.

United States utilities are trying to cut down on emissions by implementing utility-scale battery storage units (one megawatt (MW) or greater power capacity).

In March 2019, NextEra Energy (NYSE:NEE) announced plans to build a 409-MW energy storage project in Florida that will be powered by utility-scale solar.

Xcel Energy (NASDAQ:XEL) plans to replace its Comanche coal units with a $2.5-billion investment in renewables and battery storage, including 707 MW of solar PV, 1,131 megawatts (MW) of wind, and 275 MW of battery storage in the State of Colorado.

In October, Duke Energy (NYSE:DUK) announced plans to build an energy storage project at the Anderson Civic Center, Carolina, including investments to the tune of $500 million in battery storage projects for electricity generation capacity of 300 MW. 

It's interesting to note that these utilities that are investing heavily in renewable energy have outperformed their peers, returning 33.7%, 31.1%, and 17.6%, respectively, compared to the industry's 13.3% return in the past year.

The outlook for the battery storage industry is as rosy as they get.

According to the EIA, operating utility-scale battery storage power capacity in the United States more than quadrupled from 2014 (214 MW) through March 2019 (899 MW). The organization projects that utility-scale battery storage power capacity could exceed 2,500 MW by 2023, or a 180% increase, assuming currently planned additions are completed with no current operating capacity being retired.

UBS estimates that the United States energy storage market could grow to $426 billion over the next decade.

Source: EIA

Battery Metals Demand Explodes

BloombergNEF estimates that the global transition will require ~$173 trillion in energy supply and infrastructure investment over the next three decades with renewable energy expected to provide 85% of our energy needs by 2050.

BNEF projects that by 2030, consumption of lithium and nickel by the battery sector will be at least 5x current levels while demand for cobalt, used in many battery types, will jump by about 70%. Meanwhile, diverse EV and battery commodities such as copper, manganese, iron, phosphorus, and graphite—all needed in clean energy technologies and to expand electricity grids—will see sharp spikes in demand.

Other energy experts are equally bullish.

According to a recent Eurasia Review analysis,  prices for copper, nickel, cobalt, and lithium could reach historical peaks for an unprecedented, sustained period in a net-zero emissions scenario, with the total value of production rising more than four-fold for the period 2021-2040, and even rivaling the total value of crude oil production.

According to the analysts, in a net-zero emissions scenario, the metals demand boom could lead to a more than fourfold increase in the value of metals production–totaling $13 trillion accumulated over the next two decades for the four metals alone. This could rival the estimated value of oil production in a net-zero emissions scenario over that same period, making the four metals macro-relevant for inflation, trade, and output, and provide significant windfalls to commodity producers.

Estimated cumulative real revenue for the global production of selected energy transition metals, 2021-40 (billions of 2020 US dollars)

Source: Eurasia Review

By Alex Kimani for Oilprice.com

C-suite chaos at world’s top fertilizer company baffles investors
Bloomberg News | January 7, 2022 

Image courtesy of Nutrien

These are boom times in the fertilizer market, with record prices amid strong demand. But the world’s largest producer is in disarray after losing two chief executive officers in less than a year, and investors are still waiting for an explanation for the latest departure.


The surprise exit this week of Nutrien Ltd. CEO Mayo Schmidt just eight months into the job has fueled concern about corporate governance at the Canadian company.


“My concern is why does this keep happening,’’ said Brian Madden, senior vice president and portfolio manager at Toronto-based Goodreid Investment Council, which holds Nutrien shares. “It raises some questions about the board and governance. This is not something that comforts or inspires investors.’’

Nutrien declined to comment on the reason for Schmidt’s departure, though a spokesperson said the company has begun to search for a new CEO and will consider internal and external candidates. Ken Seitz, who headed the company’s potash segment, will lead the company in the meantime. Attempts to reach Schmidt for comment were unsuccessful.

Frequent leadership changes in a company can sometimes be a sign of instability or poor management. Unexplained C-suite departures are even more concerning to investors, because of potential liabilities or scandals that could affect share prices and the direction of the company.

Nutrien’s performance should be better given how high fertilizer prices are, Scotiabank analyst Ben Isaacson said in a note Thursday. The board and senior leadership had the opportunity to use a “tidal wave” of free cash flow to “meaningfully” increase earnings, and a “lack of execution” ultimately led to Schmidt’s departure. The ordeal will make Nutrien stronger in time, and the company will learn to better communicate difficult messages to shareholders, he said.


“Nutrien knows, better than all of us, what a PR nightmare this has been,” Isaacson said.

Nutrien was formed in 2018 from the merger of two Canadian agriculture firms, Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan and Agrium Inc., with Chuck Magro in the top job. In addition to its vast potash, nitrogen and phosphate operations, the company owns a network of retail outlets that sell fertilizer and seed. Schmidt was named CEO in April, replacing Magro, who is now CEO of agribusiness giant Corteva Inc. Magro declined a request to comment on his reasons for leaving Nutrien.


Shares have fallen 7.7% on the Toronto Stock Exchange since the Saskatoon, Saskatchewan-based company announced Schmidt’s exit on Jan. 4. Nutrien’s stock rose 55% last year, though the share performance lagged North American peers CF Industries Holdings Inc. and Mosaic Co. in 2021.

It could be as simple as Schmidt and the other board directors deciding that he wasn’t the right fit to lead the company long term, said Seth Goldstein, an analyst at Morningstar Investment Service. If the fit wasn’t right, “it’s best to move on quickly,” he said.

Goodreid’s Madden said he plans to continue holding Nutrien shares since the company has world-class potash deposits that are in the ground regardless of who is at the helm.

Still, “in a perfect world we would have full transparency on all this,’’ he said. “I don’t know if we’re ever really going to find out.’’

(By Jen Skerritt and Elizabeth Elkin)