Tuesday, July 19, 2022

How the Labour Party Betrayed its Young Members

ByJess Barnard
19.07.2022

In response to today's Forde Report, Keir Starmer said he had 'rid the party of destructive factionalism.' My experience as chair of Young Labour shows that's not true.



Earlier today, the Forde Report was finally presented to the Labour Party NEC. Among its many serious findings — such as deep institutional problems of racism in the party — it criticised a dysfunctional internal culture riven with factionalism which undermined the hard work done by activists across the country.

In their response to the report, the Labour leadership said that ‘Keir Starmer is now in control and has made real progress in ridding the party of the destructive factionalism and unacceptable culture that did so much damage.’ I wish this was true – but, unfortunately, that is far from my experience as chair of Young Labour.


In fact, I found that our committee’s work representing young members has been obstructed systematically at every level of the party. Time and again, we attempted to communicate with the party to establish how we could organise young people, channel their energies and win them over to campaigning for a different kind of society that would break with the Tory legacy of inequality. For not just months but years, we were rebuffed.

The frustrating reality is that young people have very few representatives in formal politics. That is, in part, why the economy is so rigged against us and why our voices are ignored. It’s not a fluke, I’m afraid, and it’s the result of exactly the same kind of processes that I experienced in the Labour Party.

Disrespecting Young People

It is almost hard to believe, but after our election in 2020, the party staff’s first contact with us was to demand that I remove our committee motion of solidarity with Jeremy Corbyn over his suspension. If we did not, they said, we would face action.


Bear in mind the circumstances. Young workers face immensely difficult conditions: many of us work in precarious conditions and zero hours contracts, a million young people lost their jobs due to the pandemic, rents are completely unsustainable, then there’s student debt, the mental health crisis – I could go on. So, of course, what was the first thing the party staff wanted to discuss? A solidarity motion with Jeremy Corbyn.

I had made numerous attempts to reach out before this, and to work with my committee to build a Young Labour capable of responding to the challenges our generation faces. They had no interest in working with us on these grounds. Instead, their only concern was that one of our motions challenged their factional position. I had just been elected on an overwhelming mandate by young people, most of whom had come into politics through supporting Corbyn and his policies. Now, the party wanted us to betray those young people – and leave them feeling that they had no voice once again.

We refused to be dictated to, but this came at a cost. What followed since has been almost constant obstruction by the party in our efforts to engage young people and young members. Even when so many young people have been at the frontline of a cost-of-living crisis, or when young people were facing summer hunger or swelling the ranks of food banks, we could count on little or no support from the party to try to organise them to fight back.

When I talk about obstruction, I want to be clear what I mean. People in political parties will have disagreements, and they should have them. Truly strong organisations are ones where we can disagree and find a way forward. We didn’t have disagreements, we were simply ignored. This was the case whether it was months of emails not being returned on basic questions like organising our conference (which is a requirement on the committee), updating our policies or hosting events. We were denied access to our own funds and even to emailing members.

Still, to this day, as my term draws to a close, these issues have never been resolved. It is such a basic level of disrespect not just to me and my committee, or the thousands of young members of the party – but to all young people who want to see political change. Far too many find themselves ignored, and they deserve so much better.

Preventing Real Representation

Young Labour committee members are not paid for our roles. We all have our own full-time jobs or study. Sometimes both. We are a collection of elected volunteers, young people who got involved in politics in their own spare time to try to build a better society.

Over the course of my term we have faced barrages of smears, investigations and false briefings against us in the press which seemed only to be designed to intimidate or silence us. It is simply impossible to believe that many of these did not originate with party staff or senior officials. I found myself asking those at the top, repeatedly, ‘is this really how the Labour Party thinks young people should be treated?’ Apparently, it is.

Young people have very few organisations to represent them in politics. Certainly not ones with thousands of members behind them and a real mandate. The Labour leadership might not respect this, but I did. I was determined that our committee could fight to give a voice to an emerging generation, one that through their experience was turning to socialist politics for the first time in decades and wanted to see transformative change at home and abroad.

Keir Starmer’s election pledges seemed to echo many of these same commitments. His policy pledges were similar to Corbyn’s in many respects and offered the prospect of fundamental change. He promised to unite the party, build a mass membership and revitalise its local structures. I was sceptical that he would follow through on these commitments, but I reached out after my election to try to ensure the party gave voice to young people and to work towards a real alternative to the Tories that young people could get behind.

Unfortunately, we found the door slammed in our face. Over the past two years, we have been denied the ability to hold a conference, which the party’s own rules oblige us to do. Then, when we wanted to organise other events, we were denied funding or our emails were simply ignored. We were not consulted on issues relating to young members. We were refused the ability to contact our members directly.

When we organised our own events at party conference, we were obstructed at every turn, told we couldn’t invite our own speakers, then found ourselves ‘disappeared’ from the programme. On the day before I received a notice of investigation in the middle of the night, I was told no one under investigation would be allowed to speak at Young Labour day at conference. The stitch-ups were blatant and exhausting.

More recently, as well as having no facilitated committee meetings for months, we have had our access to social media removed. The last channel of communication we had with young members was taken away by a party which, in reality, would have preferred we had never been elected by them in the first place.

Despite these attempts we continued to fulfill our commitments to delivering a proudly socialist youth wing. Organising training, panels and rallies with hundreds of young members covering urgent issues facing our generation, registering tens of new active Young Labour branches, standing shoulder to shoulder with movements for justice, building international socialist alliances across the globe and holding the leadership to account on Palestine, progressive policies, trade union solidarity, education and so much more.

I am proud of what our committee achieved, but we should never have had to fight like we did.

Fighting for Better


After these experiences, I am acutely aware of how far we have to go as a party. We live in a society of enormous inequality, one where the economy is rigged against young people, workers and marginalised communities. We need the Labour Party to be at the forefront of changing that – and that means championing the cause of all those left behind by this Tory government.

Too often today, our party fails in that task. And when people get active to try to fight these injustices on behalf of their communities, it often fails them too. In recent years, we have seen a party at war with its members and trade union affiliates, often more concerned with appealing to the right-wing media than defending the people who campaign for a Labour government.

Those who argue that Labour’s job is to blend in with the establishment are at best naïve, and at worst deliberately obstructing transformative change. The party’s determination in recent years to shut up young people is mirrored in its approach to many other groups, from Palestine activists to striking trade unionists. If these are the decisions it makes today, while out of power, the prospect of it fighting the powerful and vested interests while facing the pressures of government are minimal at best.

Today, millions of people are looking for an alternative. It is our job to be determined that we can build a society worth living in and provide the political direction to show that it is possible. We need a Labour Party that is a champion for the people who need change — from workers striking for proper pay rises to young people and the marginalised.

My experiences with Young Labour have taught me that our party is far from that organisation. And today’s response to the Forde Report proves it. I’m running for the NEC to hold those who refuse to respect our members to account.
About the Author

Jess Barnard is the outgoing chair of Young Labour and a candidate for Labour's National Executive Committee (NEC).

 

Our new issue is coming soon – 
UK
Key takeaways from the Forde report on Labour factionalism

Inquiry is deeply critical of party workers who backed Jeremy Corbyn and those who opposed him

Jeremy Corbyn speaking at an election campaign rally in 2017. There were clashes over which MPs to support, the report revealed
Photograph: Oli Scarff/AFP/Getty Images


Heather Stewart and Jessica Elgot
THE GUARDISN
Tue 19 Jul 2022

The Forde report into Labour party factionalism under Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership is deeply critical of staff members who were supportive of the Labour leader and those bitterly opposed to his time in office.Here are 10 key takeaways from the 138-page report:
Debilitating factionalism

Martin Forde QC paints a depressing picture of two rival camps – based around Corbyn’s office and Labour HQ in London’s Victoria – locked in a bitter struggle for control, which hampered the functioning of the party.


The factions ended up in a cycle of attack and counterattack, with each side assuming that the other was acting in bad faith (sometimes justifiably, sometimes not) and responding in kind.

Weaponising antisemitis
m

Both sides used antisemitism as a weapon, with some denying its existence and others using it primarily as a means to attack Corbyn.

Some anti-Corbyn elements of the party seized on antisemitism as a way to attack Jeremy Corbyn, and his supporters saw it simply as an attack on the leader and his faction – with both ‘sides’ thus weaponising the issue and failing to recognise the seriousness of antisemitism, its effect on Jewish communities and on the moral and political standing of the party.

Dysfunctional discipline

Labour’s disciplinary systems were “not fit for purpose” and exploited by different factions. In 2016, there were 5,000 unresolved complaints, almost of third of which related to antisemitism. But Forde did not find evidence of “systematic attempts” by Corbyn’s team to interfere in disciplinary process.

The problem was principally a lack of clarity – on both sides – about how involved Loto (the leader of the opposition’s office) should be; and this was aggravated by the mutual antagonism between HQ staff and Loto.

‘Trot hunting’ and bellringing


There was concerning behaviour by senior staff opposed to Corbyn attempting to expel party members. Staff described this process as “hunting out thousands of trots”, “trot busting”, “trot spotting”, “trot hunting” and one suggested searching the pro-Corbyn hashtag “#imwithjezza” to see if users had posted abuse. One employee described regular “bellringing” in Labour HQ.

I was advised that the bellringing was conducted by the ‘compliance’ unit and represented the successful suspension or expulsion of a member – often surrounded by the description of such members as ‘trots’.

Abusive WhatsApps

A leaked 2020 report, which triggered the Forde inquiry, was a “factional document” that “selectively quoted” some messages. But the Forde report found that the quoted WhatsApps from a group of senior management overall were not misrepresented or misleading.


We find that the messages on the SMT [senior management team] WhatsApp reveal deplorably factional and insensitive, and at times discriminatory, attitudes expressed by many of the party’s most senior staff. The substance of the quoted messages is concerning – and totally inappropriate from senior staff of a purportedly progressive political party

2017 election campaign clashes


Anti-Corbyn staffers in Labour HQ did not deliberately try to throw the election, as some leftwingers have suggested – but did set up a secret operation, channelling funds to MPs who they wanted to protect. Loto, meanwhile, sought to support its own favoured MPs.

We find that both HQ staff and Loto staff wanted the party to win with as many of their favoured MPs in place as possible, which prevented fully objective decision-making; the two sides were trying to win in different ways.

Racism

There was “overt and underlying racism and sexism” in the abusive WhatsApp messages included in the leaked report, pointing to a deeper problem with racism in the Labour party.

Racism in the party is not experienced by individuals solely through acts of aggression or microaggression towards them personally – it is experienced through seeing colleagues being passed over for promotion; being the only person from an ethnic minority background around a meeting table; being managed by a near-exclusively white senior team; and hearing the particular disdain which colleagues reserve for (for example) ethnic minority MPs, councillors and CLP (constituency Labour party) members.

Chaos in Corbyn’s office

There was hostility from Labour HQ towards Corbyn’s office, but his operation appeared deeply dysfunctional.

We have heard from a number of staff who worked in Loto in this period that the operation was unstructured and at times chaotic, with a lack of clear decision-making and reporting lines and, in particular, a reluctance on the part of Jeremy Corbyn himself to make and communicate unequivocal decisions.

Factional hires

Recruitment became a battleground in the struggle for control of the Labour party under Corbyn’s leadership, with both sides seeking to shore up their power base by hiring sympathisers – leading to a lack of diversity.

Recruitment practices were weaponised by both HQ and Loto in the relevant period … The effect was to entrench and exacerbate the divisions between the two camps. It also meant that people deemed factionally appropriate were routinely hired or promoted (by both sides) to roles for which they were not an ideal fit.

Corbyn’s cooperation

Almost no named individuals are criticised by Forde. But he observes that the former Labour leader did not himself respond to requests for interview, instead signing a joint submission.

Regrettably, certain prominent members of the party – including those central to the factual matrix – either declined to meet with the panel or failed to respond to our requests for evidence. Most notably … Jeremy Corbyn did not engage in our requests to interview him.

Jeremy Corbyn hits out at ‘repulsive racism and sexism shown to Diane Abbott’ highlighted in Labour’s Forde Report

The report found that two groups within the Labour Party treated the issue of antisemitism as a 'factional weapon'

PUBLISHED 

Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said that the Forde report should give Labour a “path forward”.

The long-awaited report into a leaked antisemitism dossier found that two groups within the Labour Party treated the issue as a “factional weapon”.

Labour said on Tuesday that its general secretary had received the report and was due to take the document to a meeting of the party’s ruling National Executive Committee (NEC). It has since been published online.

The leaked 860-page document found “no evidence” of antisemitism being handled differently from other complaints and blamed “factional opposition” towards former leader Mr Corbyn for hampering efforts to tackle the issue.

The report into antisemitism found two groups within the Labour Party used the issue as a "factional weapon".
 

In a statement published on Facebook following the release of the report, Mr Corbyn said: “The politics of the many, not the few, are more needed in this country than ever.

“We suffer a cost-of-living scandal while billionaire wealth soars and climate breakdown accelerates while fossil fuel companies boast record profits.

“For the Labour Party to be the vehicle for a better and sustainable world, things need to change. The appalling behaviour that Forde calls out, including the repulsive racism and sexism shown to Diane Abbott and others, should have no place in a progressive party.

“Toxic factionalism is far from over – nor are persistent problems of racism and sexism – and action must be taken, as Forde makes clear.

“Most of all, the Party needs to decide what it is for and who decides that. Are we a democratic socialist party, run by members and affiliated unions, that aims for a fundamental transfer of wealth and power from the few to the many? Or are we something else?”

Jeremy Corbyn slammed 'repulsive racism' aimed at Diane Abbott.
 

The foreword to the Forde report said: “The evidence clearly demonstrated that a vociferous faction in the party sees any issues regarding antisemitism as exaggerated by the right to embarrass the left.

“It was of course also true that some opponents of Mr Corbyn saw the issue of antisemitism as a means of attacking him.

“Thus, rather than confront the paramount need to deal with the profoundly serious issue of antisemitism in the party, both factions treated it as a factional weapon.”

The foreword also said the inquiry panel found the disciplinary process was “not fit for purpose” and “potentially prone to factional interference” during the period it investigated – 2015 to 2019.

However it did say “many aspects of the party’s recent reforms of disciplinary procedures” were to be applauded, and the changes were “generally steps in the right direction”.


The report also found that while “some progress” has been made in relation to sexism, “there is more to be done”.

“The party clearly needs to continue to work to root out sexual harassment and misogyny in its workplaces… but it also needs to be alive to the subtler ways in which even senior women can feel excluded and undermined,” it said.

On tackling racism, it found that “less progress has been made”.

“Many respondents felt they were confronted with a less welcoming atmosphere in which many respondents felt they were forced to immerse themselves daily, and this amounts to a constant drain on the attention and energies of talented people who would prefer to be focused on their work,” it said.

Pakistan power plant blast

If the social media claims are to be believed, the horrifying explosion happened in the Guddu Power Plant, situated in Pakistan's Sindh province. 

A search for the mishap at Guddu Power Plant took us to multiple media reports from Pakistan. Geo NewsThe Express Tribune, and Pakistan Today said that a fire had broken out at the Guddu Power Plant in the Sindh province on July 13, during the Eid-Ul-Ahza celebrations.

Reports suggest that the power plant was burnt to the ground, causing a loss worth Rs 15 billion to the national exchequer. It quoted sources revealing that there were no extinguishers available to deal with the flames. A four-member team, led by a chief engineer, was formed to investigate the mishap.

However, there was no mention of an explosion in any of these reports, making it clear that the viral video is unrelated to this incident. Thus, it is safe to conclude that the explosion video from Afghanistan has been shared with false claims.

Apparent Explosion Reported at Hoover Dam: Witnesses

Jul 19, 2022
The Mike O'Callaghan-Pat Tillman Memorial Bridge crosses the Colorado River at the Hoover Dam on the Colorado River at the Nevada and Arizona state border on June 28, 2022. (Patrick T. Fallon/AFP via Getty Images)

An explosion and a fire were reported at the Hoover Dam in Nevada on Tuesday, say witnesses and local officials.

Video footage posted to social media showed the blast and fire. Local officials have not confirmed either but said the fire department is responding.

Officials confirmed that the fire was put out, according to the City of Boulder in an update.

“The fire was extinguished before Boulder City Fire Department arrived on scene. Bureau of Reclamation/ Hoover Dam will be handling any additional questions,” said the City of Boulder, located in Nevada, at around 1:50 p.m. ET.


“Boulder City Fire Department is en route to an emergency call at Hoover Dam. No further information is available at this time,” the city had written at around 1:30 p.m. ET.


A woman, Kristy Hairston, posted a video minutes before that and said she was “touring the Hoover Dam” when she “heard an explosion.”


“Something has just blown up,” said a woman in the video. Another video uploaded to social media showed another angle of the fire and a possible explosion.

Other witnesses also reported a small explosion and fire at the dam, according to Fox Weather.


The cause and circumstances of the blast are not unknown. It’s also unclear if there were any injuries.

A major tourist attraction constructed between 1931 and 1936, the Hoover Dam helps form Lake Mead, the largest reservoir in the United States. The dam is also a hydroelectric power generator that provides electricity for utilities in several states.

Lake Mead is currently at record low levels, according to local reports.

The Epoch Times has contacted the Boulder City Fire Department for comment.

From The Epoch Times

UK orders more doses of monkeypox vaccine as cases pass 2,000

Confirmed cases no longer required to isolate at home if they do not have symptoms

A vial of monkeypox vaccine at a US clinic. The UK has ordered 100,000 more doses. Photograph: Eduardo Muñoz/Reuter

Public health officials have ordered 100,000 more doses of vaccine to help curb the spread of monkeypox as the number of UK cases rose to more than 2,000 in the months-long outbreak.

According to figures released by the Health Security Agency (UKHSA) on Tuesday, confirmed cases have risen to 2,137 in the UK, with 2,050 recorded in England. The majority of infections are in London and among men who have sex with men.

Despite the continued growth in cases, health officials have revised their guidance for close contacts of confirmed monkeypox cases, no longer requiring them to isolate at home if they do not have symptoms of the disease.

The decision was made in light of new data that showed only a small number of close contacts of confirmed cases have gone on to develop monkeypox, and a lack of evidence for transmission beyond intimate or sexual contact, the UKHSA said.

Further doses of the Imvanex smallpox vaccine, which is effective against monkeypox, are due to arrive from the manufacturer, Bavarian Nordic, this month, and more are expected by September. The NHS is contacting people eligible for the vaccine, including men who are more likely to catch the virus.

“We have now passed over 2,000 confirmed cases of monkeypox in the UK, and the outbreak continues to grow,” said Dr Merav Kliner, a deputy incident director at the UKHSA. “Based on the growing evidence of how the monkeypox virus is being passed on in this outbreak, close contacts will no longer have to isolate for 21 days unless they develop symptoms.”

While the advice was changing, Kliner said, monkeypox remains a “serious public health challenge” and she urged contacts of confirmed cases to “take a break from any activities or events involving skin-to-skin contact, including sex, hugging and kissing, to reduce the risk of the virus being passed on unknowingly”.

She urged people to stay alert to the symptoms of monkeypox and call a sexual health clinic if they become unwell. Early symptoms of monkeypox include a high temperature, headache, muscle aches and swollen glands. A rash or blisters usually appear, which can then spread around the body.

Dr Gayatri Amirthalingam, head of immunisation at the UKHSA, said: “Although most cases of monkeypox in the current outbreak are mild, severe illness can occur in some people, so it is important we use the available vaccine to reach groups where transmission is occurring.”

Former FDA Commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb calls the global monkeypox outbreak a pandemic

This 2003 electron microscope image made available by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows mature, oval-shaped monkeypox virions, left, and spherical immature virions, right, obtained from a sample of human skin associated with the 2003 prairie dog outbreak. [AP Photo/Cynthia S. Goldsmith, Russell Regner/CDC]

In an interview on CBS’ Face the Nation Sunday, former Food and Drug Administration (FDA) commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb bluntly acknowledged the growing threat posed by monkeypox and the complete failure of the Biden administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to respond to the unprecedented global outbreak.

In this Wednesday, April 5, 2017, file photo, Dr. Scott Gottlieb speaks during his confirmation hearing before a Senate committee, in Washington, as President Donald Trump's nominee to head the Food and Drug Administration. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

As Face the Nation anchor Margaret Brennan noted, there are now more than 1,800 confirmed cases of monkeypox in the United States. Exactly one month ago, the cumulative number of infections had reached 112, and the seven-day rolling average was only 10 cases per day. Since then, the seven-day rolling average has risen to 173 per day. Spikes in monkeypox infections are occurring in large metropolitan centers in New York (489), California (266), Illinois (174), Florida (154), and Washington D.C. (108). Only Germany and Spain have had more cases, but the US is expected to surpass them by next week.

Brennan opened her remarks by quoting Gottlieb, “You are saying this is a pandemic. That is not a word the [Biden] administration is using yet. What level of emergency are we at?”

Gottlieb responded, “I think they are going to be reluctant to use the word ‘pandemic’ because it is going to imply they failed to contain this. And I think at this point we failed to contain this. We are now at the cusp of this becoming an endemic virus with this now becoming something that is persistent, that we need to continue to deal with.”

He added, “I think the window for getting control of this and containing it probably has closed. And if it hasn’t closed, it certainly has started to close. With 11,000 cases across the world right now and 1,800 in the US, we are probably detecting just a fraction of the actual cases because we had for a long time a very narrow case definition on who got tested. And by and large, we are looking in the community of men who have sex with men at STD [sexually transmitted disease] clinics. We are looking there, and we are finding cases there. But it is a fact that there are cases outside of that community right now. We are not picking them up because we aren’t looking there.”

At present, five laboratories across the US can run monkeypox PCR tests. Dr. Kavita Patel, a family medicine physician in Washington D.C. and former Obama administration director of policy for the White House Office of Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Engagement, recently noted the US could run approximately 6,000 tests per week, and the turnaround time on these can take upwards of two to three days.

Gottlieb explained that though this is a slower-moving virus than SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, the response and the mistakes made with the COVID-19 pandemic are similar to what is happening with monkeypox. These include “having a very narrow case definition, not having enough testing early enough, not deploying vaccines in an aggressive fashion to ring vaccinate. But now this is firmly embedded in the community. While it’s not going to explode because it is harder for this virus to spread, it is probably going to be persistent. You will have this as a sort of fact of life maybe spreading as a sexually transmitted disease, but also breaking out of those settings.”

When Brennan asked about the reasons behind the current difficulties of New York politicians in accessing vaccines from the Biden administration, Gottlieb bluntly stated that there were inadequate supplies of the Jynneos vaccine in the strategic national stockpiles. There were only 2,000 doses there as “a hedge against smallpox. We took our eye off that ball, so we didn’t replenish that supply.” He then sought to reassure viewers that things will get somewhat better, as the Biden administration has secured 800,000 doses to be sent to the US from abroad.

Notably, over the last five years, there were several minor monkeypox outbreaks across non-endemic regions and more significant outbreaks across Central and West Africa. Additionally, monkeypox experts warned that a global pandemic was inevitable unless active measures to survey these infections were put in place.

Gottlieb criticized the CDC and the federal government for their lackluster response to both the monkeypox and COVID-19 pandemics, stating emphatically, “We need to fundamentally reform how we respond to these crises!”

Gottlieb’s comments on monkeypox were remarkable, but incomplete and flawed. One crucial point that should have been raised is the threat posed by the lack of familiarity of health care systems with monkeypox and how to manage and treat it, as these facilities will once again soon become vectors of transmission.

Additionally, there was no urgent warning of the profound dangers posed to children as tens of millions are sent back to school in the coming weeks. Last week, the first report emerged of a child exposed to monkeypox at school in South London. Children, who are immunologically naïve to monkeypox, face an immediate existential threat to which the public health infrastructure is unprepared and has remained publicly mute.

Furthermore, Nordic Bavarian, the manufacturer of the Jynneos vaccine, is currently doing maintenance on their manufacturing plants and will be unable to mass produce their vaccines until late this year at the earliest, at which point there could be over 1 million cases globally. Gottlieb’s assurance that the vaccine shortage will soon remedy itself is false. Brennan also did not raise the issue of vaccine nationalism that has been horrifically expressed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, the monkeypox vaccines are not authorized for those under 18, which means the FDA and CDC will most likely have to waive these restrictions, a process which could take many months.

Most fundamentally, Gottlieb’s claim that “We’re now at the cusp of this becoming an endemic virus” is completely false. As with COVID-19, the monkeypox pandemic can be stopped, and in fact much more easily by the nature of the virus and the infections it causes. But this will require a globally-coordinated initiative to conduct mass testing and contact tracing and direct vaccines where they are needed. Due to the more extended infectious period of monkeypox (three to four weeks) as compared to COVID-19, isolation facilities and medical treatments become critical to these efforts.

It has been just over two months since the first patient with monkeypox outside countries where the virus is endemic was identified by UK public health officials on May 7, 2022. Since then, cases have risen exponentially across the globe, with epicenters of the outbreak in Europe and North and South America. As of July 17, 2022, 12,701 confirmed and suspected cases were reported. The global seven-day rolling average of new monkeypox cases continues to climb at 723 cases per day and infections have been registered across 76 countries and territories.

After a little over two months, Gottlieb is already proclaiming the latest infectious disease entrenched in society. Cultivating such a fatalistic attitude serves the interests of the American ruling class, which is determined to dismantle public health. In reality, if the unlimited resources being funneled to the military intelligence apparatus were instead used for social needs, COVID-19, monkeypox, and other infectious diseases could be eliminated in rapid succession.

Gottlieb’s premature comment that monkeypox is “at the cusp” of becoming “endemic” is made in the third year of the COVID-19 pandemic, after months of relentless propaganda portraying the Omicron variant as the final variant that would cause SARS-CoV-2 to become endemic. Just as the financial oligarchs and their media spokespersons insist that the coronavirus is now a permanent fixture within every community and have declared it endemic, Gottlieb’s comments on this are not so much a scientific assessment as a political maneuver.

The World Health Organization (WHO) will be reconvening the emergency committee on monkeypox this Thursday, July 21. The committee met initially on June 23, 2022, but on a split decision recommended against declaring a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC). There were only 3,600 cumulative cases at the time, and the daily rolling average in new cases stood at 225. In less than four weeks, cases have risen nearly four-fold.

It must be recalled that the WHO waited until March 11, 2020, almost six weeks from their declaration of a public health emergency of international concern, to declare COVID-19 a pandemic. The WHO has never fully explained this inaction or taken the US and Europe to task for their criminal policies, and have now effectively conceded to the “learn to live with the virus” policy being brutally enforced by nearly every government outside China.

The COVID-19 pandemic has laid bare the criminal character of the world capitalist system. In the United States, the wealthiest and most technologically advanced country, the prioritization of profits over lives has killed over one million people and debilitated millions more. With this precedent set, the monkeypox outbreak is now being managed no differently.

The deepening catastrophe of the global monkeypox outbreak underscores the critical fact that despite the experience of the past two-and-a-half years, the world is woefully unprepared to face emerging zoonotic threats to which mankind will increasingly be exposed as a result of climate change, globalization and the highly interconnected nature of modern society.

It is essential that workers, scientists and anti-COVID activists assimilate the lessons of the COVID-19 pandemic and develop a powerful global movement fighting for the socialist reorganization of the world economy. Only on this basis will there be a vast expansion of funding for public health and health care, and resources allocated to halt and reverse climate change.

 

France's nationalisation of energy company EDF to cost nearly €10bn

The government is looking to shore up domestic energy supplies

EDF -

The French government plans to fully nationalise energy giant EDF and is to shell out nearly €10bn (£8.5bn) as it looks to address the energy crisis.

On Tuesday, France's finance ministry said it had offered €9.7bn, or €12 a share, for 16% stake of the debt-laden company it does not already own.

Among its developments, EDF is building the Hinkley Point C nuclear reactor in Somerset, though it won't be completed for some time amid delays and cost increases.

The offer compared with the closing price of €7.84 on July 5, the day before the government mooted the nationalisation, this offer is 53% higher and also some way above an €8bn estimate last week.

EDF shares, suspended since July 13 while investors awaited government plans, jumped 15% to €11.80, giving the company a value of €45.4bn.

EDF's convertible debt holders will receive an offer of €15.64 for each bond, and the final offer for the company's stock is due to be submitted to Autorité des Marchés Financiers by early September.

Though nationalisation offers some certainty to EDF's finances at a crucial time, despite a broad oil crisis aggravated by Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the French government's plans to nationalise EDF is facing fierce opposition from employee shareholders who are to sue the government.

France derived 69% of its electricity from EDF's nuclear production in 2021, but this year's supply level is expected to be the lowest in over three decades.

Royal Mail workers vote for strike action over 2% pay rise

“While bosses rake in £758mln in profit and shareholders take £400mln, workers are expected to take a serious real-terms pay cut," said CWU general secretary Dave Ward



Royal Mail PLC (LSE:RMG) is facing a strike over pay from more than 115,000 of its workers, which could be the largest walkout in a summer of industrial action in Britain.

Announcing the results of a ballot of its members, the Communication Workers Union said 97.6% voted for strike action, based on a 77% ballot turnout.

The workers “will not budge” until they receive a “dignified, proper pay rise”, the CWU said, with workers objecting to a 2% pay rise offer that represents a cut in real terms with consumer price inflation above 8% and expected to top 11% in the autumn.

Royal Mail managers have already voted to go on strike earlier this month, with trade union Unite's members due to walk out from Wednesday 20 July until the Friday of that week.

CWU general secretary Dave Ward said the result of the ballot was “a vote of no confidence in Royal Mail’s CEO and board, who should seriously consider their futures in our industry.

“Crucially, the vote can leave no doubt that postal workers are united, and that they are demanding the proper pay rise they deserve.

“While bosses rake in £758mln in profit and shareholders take £400mln, workers are expected to take a serious real-terms pay cut."

He added: “The CWU’s message to Royal Mail’s leadership is loud and clear – not a single postal worker in this country will budge until you get serious and give them a dignified, proper pay rise.”

Royal Mail workers vote to go on strike in dispute over pay


Royal Mail workers have voted overwhelmingly to strike in a dispute over pay, the Communication Workers Union have announced.
(Gareth Fuller/PA) / PA Archive

ByRobert Dex@RobDexES
2 hours ago

Royal Mail workers have voted overwhelmingly to strike in a dispute over pay, the Communication Workers Union have announced.

A ballot of union members showed huge support for industrial action in protest at a 2% pay offer.

A total of 97.6%, of those who voted, backed strikes, on a turnout of 77%. The union said it was an unprecedented result.

General secretary Dave Ward said there will now be a “small window” of opportunity for talks to avoid walkouts before strike dates are set.

He said postal workers received big support from the public for their efforts during the pandemic and would continue to receive backing for their pay campaign.

Mr Ward said the result was “also a vote of no confidence in Royal Mail’s chief executive and board”.

He added: “Crucially, the vote can leave no doubt that postal workers are united, and that they are demanding the proper pay rise they deserve.

“While bosses rake in £758 million in profit and shareholders take £400 million, workers are expected to take a serious real-terms pay cut.

“Postal workers won’t accept their living standards being hammered by bosses who are typical of business leaders today – overpaid, underqualified, out of their depth.

“In our country right now, corporate failure gets rewarded over and over again.

“It’s pathetic that CEOs take home lottery win salaries then offer real-terms pay cuts to people who made them their profit.

“The CWU’s message to Royal Mail’s leadership is loud and clear – not a single postal worker in this country will budge until you get serious and give them a dignified, proper pay rise.”

A Royal Mail spokesperson said: “We are disappointed that CWU members have voted in favour of industrial action.

“We offered a deal worth up to 5.5% for CWU grade colleagues, the biggest increase we have offered for many years, which the CWU rejected.

“We can only fund this offer by making the changes that will pay for it and ensure Royal Mail can grow and remain competitive in a fast-moving industry.

“Despite nearly three months of talks, the CWU have not engaged in any meaningful discussion on the changes we need to make to adapt. Ensuring we can change, at pace, is the route to protecting well-paid, permanent, jobs long term and retain our place as the industry leader on pay and terms and conditions. That is in the interest of Royal Mail and all its employees.

“In the event of industrial action, we have contingency plans to minimise customer disruption and will work to keep people, businesses and the country connected.”

It comes as the Government announced pay deals for some public sector workers with more than one million NHS staff, including nurses, paramedics and midwives, getting a pay rise of at least £1,400 with lowest earners to receive up to 9.3%.

Eligible dentists and doctors will receive 4.5% and police officers 5%, the Government said.