Wednesday, November 29, 2023

Pope Strips Conservative US Cardinal of Vatican Privileges, Vatican Official Says


By Philip Pullella
 Reuters
Nov. 28, 2023, 

VATICAN CITY (Reuters) - Pope Francis has removed some of the Vatican privileges of conservative American Cardinal Raymond Burke, including a large subsidized apartment and his salary, a senior Vatican official said on Tuesday.

The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, participated in a regular Vatican meeting when the pope made the announcement to senior aides last week.

He quoted the pope as saying that Burke, one of his fiercest critics, was "working against the Church and against the papacy" and that he had sown "disunity" in the Church.

Burke has had no senior Vatican job for years. His is a consultant to one of its tribunals, as are numerous cardinals who live outside Rome, and spends most of his time in his native state of Wisconsin.

The official who was at the meeting denied media reports that Francis had called the 75-year-old Burke "an enemy".

Burke is a hero to traditionalists in the Church, particularly in the United States, where he is often a guest on conservative Catholic media outlets that have made criticism of the pope a mainstay of their operations.

The move by Francis was his second involving a conservative American prelate this month.

On Nov. 11, the pope dismissed another conservative critic, Bishop Joseph Strickland of Tyler, Texas, after Strickland refused to step down following a Vatican investigation.

While conservatives are a minority in the Church, they have significant clout in advanced countries such as the United States, in part because of their link to conservative politics.

Burke has been opposing the pope's reforms almost from the start.

In 2014, a year after Francis was chosen, the pope removed Burke as head of a Vatican tribunal and moved him to a largely ceremonial post several days after Burke said the Church under Francis was "like a ship without a rudder".

Most recently, in October, Burke was one of five cardinals who openly challenged a global month-long Vatican meeting, known as a synod.

Before the meeting began, Burke was the star quest of a gathering of conservative in a theatre just a few blocks from the Vatican.

There, he called for a defence against the "the poison of confusion, error and division" in the Church.

A person close to Burke said the cardinal had not yet been formerly informed of the pope's decision, which was first reported by the conservative Italian outlet, La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana

(Reporting by Philip Pullella; Editing by Bill Berkrot)


Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke speaks during the conference "The Synodal Tower of Babel" on the eve of the opening of the synod of bishops, in Rome, Italy, October 3, 2023. REUTERS/Remo Casilli/File Photo

Reports Say Pope Francis Is Evicting U.S. Cardinal From His Vatican Home

Word of the action against Cardinal Raymond Burke came after the prelate’s increasingly pointed critiques of the reform-minded pope.

Cardinal Raymond Burke has been Pope Francis’ leading critic from the traditionalist wing of the Catholic Church.
Credit...Antonio Masiello/Getty Images

By Jason Horowitz and Ruth Graham
Jason Horowitz reported from Vatican City, and Ruth Graham from Dallas.

Nov. 28, 2023

Almost as soon as Pope Francis became the head of the Roman Catholic church in 2013, Raymond Burke, an American cardinal, emerged as his leading critic from within the church, becoming a de facto antipope for frustrated traditionalists who believed Francis was diluting doctrine.

Francis frequently demoted and stripped the American cleric of influence, but this month, the pope apparently finally had enough, according to one high-ranking Vatican official who spoke on the condition of anonymity. Francis told a meeting of high-ranking Vatican officials that he intended to throw the cardinal out of his Vatican-subsidized apartment and deprive him of his salary as a retired cardinal.

The news of the possible eviction was first reported by the conservative Italian newspaper La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana, which is close to Cardinal Burke and recently sponsored a conference featuring the prelate criticizing a major meeting of bishops convened by Francis. The newspaper’s report comes only weeks after Francis removed another vocal conservative critic, Joseph Strickland, the bishop of Tyler, Texas, after a Vatican investigation into the governance of his diocese.

“If this is accurate, it is an atrocity that must be opposed,” Bishop Strickland said in a post on the social media platform X on Monday. “If it is false information it needs to be corrected immediately.”

The Vatican did not correct it. Asked about the report on Tuesday, the Vatican’s spokesman, Matteo Bruni, declined to confirm or deny it, telling reporters that “I don’t have anything particular to say about that.”

He said questions regarding the report should be put to Cardinal Burke. An email to Cardinal Burke’s secretary was not returned.

Francis told the heads of Vatican offices last week about his decision to punish Cardinal Burke because he was a source of “disunity” in the church, according to The Associated Press, which based its report on an unnamed official who attended the meeting. Another official told The A.P. that Francis later explained that he removed Cardinal Burke’s privileges because he was using them in his campaign against the church.

More on the Roman Catholic ChurchAmerican Bishops Meet: More than 250 American bishops convened in Baltimore for an annual gathering that opened with a call for unity. But the contentious relationship between Pope Francis and conservative American Catholics was front and center.
Nuanced Guidance: The pope, who has made reaching out to L.G.B.T.Q. Catholics a hallmark of his papacy, signaled that transgender people can be baptized, serve as godparents and be witnesses at church weddings.
Nuns vs. Climate Activists: A yearslong standoff over an enormous church complex in a natural park in the South of France recently broke out in clashes, with nuns giving chase.
Synod on Synodality: A monthlong meeting convened by Francis to determine the future of the Roman Catholic Church ended with a document that said it was “urgent” that women have a larger role but postponed discussion of major issues such as ordaining female deacons.

Corriere della Sera, Italy’s leading daily newspaper, also confirmed the report about the possible eviction with an anonymous prelate, who told the paper that the pope intended to take “measures of an economic nature and canonical penalties” against Cardinal Burke.

Some conservatives have attributed Francis’ disciplinary activity to the new head of the church’s office on church doctrine, the Argentine Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernández. But supporters of Francis assert that he had exercised prodigious patience with criticism over the last decade, in the interest of opening up healthy debates, but that it wore thin as the critiques became ideologically tinged and, they say, seemed intent on dividing a church headed in a direction traditionalists did not support.

Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernández of Argentina is the new head of the office on church doctrine.
Credit...Riccardo De Luca/Associated Press

Cardinal Burke has seen himself as a loyal defender of the church’s doctrinal law and papal traditions against what he has called the “confusion, error and division” caused by Francis.

In the days before a major assembly of the world’s bishops and laypeople who had gathered to discuss some of the most sensitive topics in the church, Cardinal Burke and other traditionalist prelates made public an exchange of letters with Francis. In the letters, they aired grave doubts about the legitimacy of the meeting and urged Francis to slam the door shut on proposals that they believe would erode the doctrine of the church, including the blessing of same-sex unions.

Then Cardinal Burke recently sat onstage in a Rome theater and, at a forum sponsored by La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana, inveighed against an assembly that has the “harmful goal” of reshaping the hierarchy of the church with radical, secular and modern ideas that included inclusivity of L.G.B.T.Q. people.

“It’s unfortunately very clear that the invocation of the Holy Spirit on the part of some has as its aim to push forward an agenda that is more political and human than ecclesiastical and divine,” he said at the time

A favorite of Benedict XVI, Cardinal Burke, who was previously best known for denying communion to John Kerry during the politician’s 2004 presidential campaign, has clashed with Francis repeatedly, even in choice of vestments. Unlike Francis, who preferred more modest priests, Cardinal Burke occasionally wore a long train of watered silk, velvet gloves and extravagant brocades that once prompted Vatican officials to ask him to “tone it down a bit.”

On issues the two are far apart. Cardinal Burke opposed immigration as a threat to the West’s Christian values, vigorously opposed Francis’ softening on gay issues and church laws, and played in populist politics in Italy and abroad. He became a hero to the “Rad Trads,” or radical traditionalists.

For a vocal faction of conservative Catholics in the United States, the moves to rein in Cardinal Burke are a signal that Francis is cracking down disproportionately on dissenters to his right.

“If he’s being evicted from his apartment, this is a vicious act,” said Michael Hichborn, president of the Lepanto Institute, a conservative Catholic organization based in Virginia.

Other American observers described Cardinal Burke as a cleric who has consistently used his large platform, especially in the United States, to undermine Francis’ goals for the church. This year, he wrote in the preface to a book critical of the pope’s major global gathering on the church’s future that the event could lead to schism.

“This is like accusing the president of sedition,” said David Gibson, director of the Center on Religion and Culture at Fordham University and a commentator on Catholic issues. “They’re the most serious charges one can launch against the pope or any Catholic.”

Over the last decade, Cardinal Burke, 75, has expressed doubts about the pope’s grasp on church teaching and accused him of alienating church law-abiding conservatives with his inclusive stance.

A populist fan of European nationalists and former President Donald J. Trump, he rarely missed an opportunity to excoriate the pope’s politics, especially his welcoming of L.G.B.T.Q. people and immigration.

Cardinal Burke had twice joined other conservative cardinals in issuing a “dubia” letter to Francis, essentially a list of formal questions that call his vision into question. In 2016, after Francis signaled a pastoral path for divorced and remarried Catholics to receive holy communion, Cardinal Burke and other conservative cardinals sent him a letter demanding clarification. Francis didn’t respond.

Francis has not exactly given Cardinal Burke a pass in the past.
Pope Francis has removed Cardinal Raymond Burke from several powerful positions.
Credit...Gregorio Borgia/Associated Press

The pope moved Cardinal Burke out of his position in the powerful church office that helps nominate bishops, a post that gave him great influence in the United States. In November 2014, Francis removed Cardinal Burke from his position as the head of the Vatican’s highest court and instead named him to a largely ceremonial post for the medieval Roman Catholic chivalric religious order, the Knights of Malta.

During the pandemic, Francis seemed to take aim at Cardinal Burke during a 2021 news conference aboard the papal plane, when he lamented vaccine “negationists” among the cardinals. That came after Cardinal Burke had repeated a conspiracy theory that Covid vaccines were being used to implant microchips “under the skin of every person, so that at any moment, he or she can be controlled regarding health and regarding other matters, which we can only imagine as a possible object of control by the state.”

Shortly before Francis’ comments, Cardinal Burke contracted the virus and was placed on a respirator in an American hospital.

As news of the pope’s apparent remarks made it around the Vatican, conservatives expressed shock and dismay, while liberals suggested it was a long time coming. What was clear was that whether Cardinal Burke stayed in his apartment and received his salary or not, he was unlikely to lower his volume.

“That’s not going to stop him from talking,” said Cardinal Peter Turkson of Ghana.

Jason Horowitz is the Rome bureau chief for The Times, covering Italy, the Vatican, Greece and other parts of Southern Europe. More about Jason Horowitz

Ruth Graham is a Dallas-based national correspondent covering religion, faith and values. She previously reported on religion for Slate. More about Ruth Graham

Pope punishes leading critic Cardinal Burke in second action against conservative American prelates


Cardinal Raymond Burke applauds during a news conference at the Italian Senate, in Rome, on Sept. 6, 2018. Pope Francis has taken measures to punish one of his highest-ranking critics, Cardinal Raymond Burke, by yanking his right to a Vatican apartment and salary in the second such radical action against a conservative American prelate this month, according to two people briefed on the measures. (AP Photo/Alessandra Tarantino, File)Read More

Cardinal Raymond Burke attends the conference “The synodal Babel” in a theater near the Vatican on Oct. 3, 2023, after a letter he signed with others and containing questions to Pope Francis about the upcoming synod of bishops was made public. Pope Francis has taken measures to punish one of his highest-ranking critics, Cardinal Raymond Burke, by yanking his right to a Vatican apartment and salary in the second such radical action against a conservative American prelate this month. (AP Photo/Gregorio Borgia, File)

BY NICOLE WINFIELD
Updated November 28, 2023

VATICAN CITY (AP) — Pope Francis has punished one of his highest-ranking critics, Cardinal Raymond Burke, by yanking his right to a subsidized Vatican apartment and salary in the second such radical action against a conservative American prelate this month, according to two people briefed on the measures.

Francis told a meeting of the heads of Vatican offices last week that he was moving against Burke, because he was a source of “disunity” in the church, said one of the participants at the Nov. 20 meeting. The participant spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to reveal the contents of the encounter.

Francis said he was removing Burke’s privileges of having a subsidized Vatican apartment and salary as a retired cardinal because he was using the privileges against the church, said another person who was subsequently briefed on the pope’s measures. That person also spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to reveal the details.
Burke, a 75-year-old canon lawyer whom Francis had fired as the Vatican’s high court justice in 2014, has become one of the most outspoken critics of the pope, his outreach to LGBTQ+ Catholics and his reform project to make the church more responsive to the needs of ordinary faithful.

Twice, Burke has joined other conservative cardinals in issuing formal questions to the pontiff, known as “dubia,” asking him to clarify questions of doctrine that upset conservatives and traditionalists. The cardinals then leaked the questions to the media after Francis didn’t immediately reply.

And on the eve of Francis’ big meeting of bishops last month, known as a synod, Burke presided over a counter-synod of sorts just steps away from St. Peter’s Square. There, Burke delivered a stinging rebuke of Francis’ vision of “synodality” as well as his overall reform project for the church.

“It’s unfortunately very clear that the invocation of the Holy Spirit by some has the aim of bringing forward an agenda that is more political and human than ecclesial and divine,” Burke told the conference titled “The Synodal Babel.”

Calls and emails to Burke and his secretary weren’t immediately returned. The Vatican spokesman, Matteo Bruni, referred questions to Burke.

“I don’t have anything particular to say about that,” Bruni told reporters.

Burke had always defended his actions as being of service to the church and the papacy, saying it was his obligation as a cardinal and bishop to uphold church teaching and correct errors.

“The sheep depend on the courage of pastors who must protect them from the poison of confusion, error and division,” he told the Oct. 3 conference, prompting applause from the crowd.

Burke is the second American prelate to face punishment in what appears to be a new reform-minded phase of Francis’ pontificate, which has accelerated with the arrival in September of his hand-picked new doctrine czar, Argentine Cardinal Victor Fernández.

Earlier this month, Francis forcibly removed the bishop of Tyler, Texas, Joseph Strickland, another conservative who had also become one of Francis’ critics. Strickland was removed after a Vatican investigation into governance of his diocese.

In a tweet Tuesday, Strickland expressed shock at reports that Francis had taken action taken against his fellow American, which was first reported by the conservative Italian newspaper La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana, the main sponsor of “The Synodal Babel” conference.

“If this is accurate it is an atrocity that must be opposed. If it is false information it needs to be corrected immediately,” Strickland said.

Pope Benedict XVI had made Burke a cardinal in 2010, after he appointed him prefect of the Apostolic Signatura, the Vatican’s high court. After Francis removed him from that position in 2014, he made Burke the cardinal patron of the Knights of Malta, a prestigious but limited role.

But there too, Burke and Francis clashed over Burke’s involvement in a governance crisis at the chivalric order.

Francis pushed him aside and named two subsequent envoys to essentially replace him.

More recently, the two clashed over COVID-19 vaccines. Francis had been a big proponent of the vaccines and had lashed out at vaccine skeptics, who included some conservative Catholics.

During a 2021 airborne news conference, Francis lamented the vaccine “negationists” in the College of Cardinals, an apparent reference to Burke, who had just been hospitalized in the U.S. and placed on a ventilator with a serious bout of the virus.
Kevin McCarthy schooled for false claim about American history

Former Speaker challenged over claim US has never taken land after wars

Graeme Massie
Los Angeles

Kevin McCarthy was given a savage fact-checking for his seemingly poor grasp of American history.

The former Speaker of the House, a Republican from California, claimed at a recent event that “in every single war that America has fought, we have never asked for land afterwards.”

And he added: “Except enough to bury the Americans who gave the ultimate sacrifice for that freedom we went in for.”

Mr McCarthy, who was voted out of his job in October, was so proud of his assertion that he went on to post a video clip on Elon Musk’s X social media platform, with the caption “Think for one moment.”

But social media users were quick to point out a glaring mistake in Mr McCarthy’s understanding of his own country, and state’s, history.

A community note was added to his tweet, clarifying that the US had taken land at the end of the Mexican-American War in 1848.


That land made up 55 per cent of Mexico’s territory, around 529,000 square miles, and is now the states of California, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah, as well as parts of Arizona, Colorado, Oklahoma, Kansas and Wyoming.

“Think of all the wisdom from this man we’d be deprived of if his home state of California had never spontaneously risen from the sea and attached itself to the United States,” wrote George Conway.

And gun control activist David Hogg added: “This is why we need to fund public education more. Why the history channel should go back to talking about actual history and why the Department of Education needs to be expanded NOT abolished. This is so ignorant it hurts.”


Other X users pointed out to Mr McCarthy that the US took control of Guam, Puerto Rico and the Philippines as territories after winning the Spanish-American War in 1898.

And it was also highlighted that the US took control of American Samoa after the second Samoan Civil War.

After the Revolutionary War, the US also took control of territory from Britain that included most of the land east of the Mississippi River, and most of the upper Midwest.
Musk mocked for trying to resurrect QAnon Pizzagate conspiracy following fake headline

X/Twitter owner uses meme from the hit show The Office to launch himself into fresh controversy days after endorsing an antisemitic conspiracy theory

Mike Bedigan
Los Angeles

Elon Musk has been criticised for seemingly attempting to resurrect the widely debunked QAnon conspiracy theory, “Pizzagate”.

Pizzagate was an anti-Hillary Clinton conspiracy theory promoted on 4chan, Reddit, Twitter and other platforms in the final days before the 2016 US presidential election, and is seen as a precursor to the QAnon movement.


Believers accused then presidential hopeful Ms Clinton and other senior Democrats of running a child sex trafficking ring out of the basement of a Washington DC pizza restaurant. The conspiracy theory led to a shooting at the restaurant – which turned out not to have a basement.


On Tuesday the billionaire tech entrepreneur shared a meme from from the US television comedy The Office on his social media platform X on Tuesday, which accused the “experts” that had debunked the theory of themselves being paedophiles.

The post, which was not labelled with a correctional “community note”, made reference to former ABC journalist James Gordon Meek who pleaded guilty to child sexual abuse image charges earlier this year.


“Does seem at least a little bit suspicious,” Mr Musk wrote, also linking to an article about Meek’s guilty plea.



Meme from The Office posted on X/Twitter by Elon Musk appearing to promote the QAnon Pizzagate conspiracy theory
(Elon Musk / X)

Other X users suggested that Mr Musk had fallen for a fake New York Post headline which was circulated on the platform that associated Meek with the debunking of Pizzagate. The former journalist was not involved in the exposing of the conspiracy theory, according to a fact check by the Reuters news agency.


“So... Community notes? He’s just wildly transparent,” wrote one user.

Another added: “Man who controls Twitter/X and, while we’re on it, a majority of the earth’s satellites, among other things, sharing a *wildly* debunked conspiracy theory.

“We don’t just have "experts" – we *know* it was invented on 4chan. This is flirting with some incredibly dangerous stuff.”

Shayan Sardarizadeh, of the BBC Verify team, wrote in response: “The meme shared by Elon Musk about the pizzagate conspiracy theory is itself based on the completely false claim…

“... that James Gordon Meek, a journalist who recently pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography, had debunked pizzagate. Meek never reported on pizzagate.”

Another BBC disinformation journalist, Alistair Coleman added: “Your regular reminder that Pizzagate was created as a joke on a 4Chan message board, but spread because far too many people on social media aren’t particularly good at critical thinking. And here we are.”
By Tuesday lunchtime Mr Musk had apparently deleted the tweet.

It comes shortly after another online post by Mr Musk that attempted to link the founder of Media Matters – a left-leaning non-profit group that has accused X of promoting adverts from global companies alongside pro-Hitler content – to the owner of the Pizzagate restaurant.

Earlier this month, a slew of big brands, including Disney and IBM, decided to stop advertising on X after a report by Media Matters said ads were appearing alongside pro-Nazi content and white nationalist posts.

Mr Musk boosted a post rehashing the claims of links between the company and the restaurant owner by replying to it, with the one-word phrase: “Weird.”


Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (centre) takes Elon Musk (left) on a tour of Kibbutz Kfar Aza
(Getty Images)

Self-described “free-speech absolutist” Mr Musk has also come under fire on multiple occasions recently over content promoting antisemitism on the site, sparking outrage over his own posts and comments which have promoted antisemitic content.

On Wednesday November 15, Mr Musk described a post that said a post, had appeared to push the “great replacement” conspiracy theory on X, was “the actual truth”. The post claimed that Jewish communities “have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them”.

“You have said the actual truth,” Mr Musk wrote, a response which earned him praise from white nationalist Nick Fuentes – and accusations of antisemitism from dozens more, including the White House.

He later responded to the accusations of antisemitism, insisting “nothing could be further from the truth”.

Following the controversies, Mr Musk visited Israel on Monday, where he toured a kibbutz attacked by Hamas militants and held talks with top leaders.

The billionaire met with Israeli President Isaac Herzog, who scolded him over content on his platform, and joined Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for a tour of the Kfar Azza kibbutz, a rural village that Hamas militants stormed on 7 October in a deadly assault that launched the war.

“The platforms you lead, unfortunately, have a huge reservoir of hatred, hatred of Jews and antisemitism,” Mr Herzog told him.
World faced record number of humanitarian emergencies in 2023: UNHCR


Over 114 million people were forced to flee their homes worldwide by the end of September, more than double of a decade ago, Matthew Saltmarsh of UNHCR tells Anadolu


Rabia Ali |28.11.2023 - AA


ISTANBUL

The year 2023 has been exceptionally difficult for the humanitarian sector, with the world facing a record number of emergencies, according a top official of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR).

“When you look around the world, there are a number of crises and emergencies. We have been dealing with a record number of emergencies as an agency,” said Matthew Saltmarsh, head of the News and Media Section at UNHCR.

In an interview with Anadolu on the sidelines of the Stratcom Summit in Istanbul, Saltmarsh provided insights into the myriad of challenges faced by refugees around the world, shedding light on the worsening situation as the year draws to a close.

Emphasizing the alarming increase in displacement, he said over 114 million people had been forced to flee their homes worldwide by the end of September.

“If you look back to a decade earlier, 10 years earlier, that’s more than doubled. So, it’s a huge increase and it’s also increased this year,” he said.

“There are multiple crises and, of course, the situation in Gaza has only added to that sense of, in many ways, desperation,” he said, citing the February earthquakes in Türkiye, the “huge displacement” due to conflict in Sudan, the migration crises in the Mediterranean and Central America, and the situation with refugees in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Saltmarsh clarified that his agency does not have a mandate to work directly in Gaza, but added that the events there are of “huge concern.”

“We welcome the humanitarian pause and hope that the situation can stabilize and de-escalate in the weeks and months ahead,” he said.


- The Mediterranean

Regarding the number of migrant crossings in the Mediterranean, he said the situation is of particular because of the people involved and the grave risks to their lives.

He said the UNHCR has been trying to promote an approach that looks at the challenges along the entire routes, be it the Mediterranean, Central America or parts of Asia.

The approach also aims to address the root causes of why people are leaving, he said.

“That’s a very difficult and deep-seated problem that involves and requires investment, development, financing and, of course, peace building and conflict resolution,” he said.

Part of the objective is to also to support people with humanitarian interventions and also to try to find “third country solutions,” he added.

Pressures have increased, particularly on Italy this year, which saw 128,000 arrivals, he said.

Saltmarsh stressed the need for the EU to put in place structures to ensure that asylum seekers’ claims are heard.

“If those are genuine claims, if refugee status is granted, the people can be received within Europe, not just by one state on the front line, but that responsibility is shared equally among the members of the European Union,” he said, adding that a number of asylum systems in Europe and in other parts of the world have become overburdened.

Speaking about the crisis seen a few months back on Lampedusa, he said that this has been a very difficult year for Italy, while stressing that the root causes of crossings through the Mediterranean have been changing over the years.


- Europe’s migration laws

Regarding migration-related laws introduced by European countries, he said that everything comes down again to sharing responsibility.

About the British government’s plan to move asylum seekers to Rwanda, he said: “We came out on a number of occasions criticizing it because we felt that it was externalizing the UK’s asylum responsibilities and putting a lot of pressure on Rwanda and the Rwandan asylum system.”

Concerns around countries in the Global North, which have more resources to deal with the increasing number of refugees, are still small compared to the less developed and less wealthy nations in the Global South, Saltmarsh added.

He emphasized that the major burden still lies very much with host countries that neighbor the ones where refugees are fleeing.

“When it comes to the countries of the Global North that are better resourced, we think that they should maintain their commitments under the Refugee Convention, allow people to claim asylum,” he said.

If those claims are valid, then they should be integrated into those society, he added.

Regarding the contrast in how Ukrainian refugees were welcomed in European countries as compared to others, he said it was logical that European nations would be their primary hosts because of the proximity.

“We have been concerned and made our criticisms clear when European countries have pushed back refugees, when they’ve taken steps to try to evade their responsibilities under international law, then we’ve been quick to call it out,” he said.

“It’s important that any refugee, whether they’re from Ukraine or whether they’re from sub-Saharan Africa or any other part of the world, is given the same right to seek asylum when they arrive on a territory.”


- Situation in Sudan ‘absolutely dire’

In Sudan, there has been massive displacement since a conflict broke out in April between the Sudanese military and paramilitary Rapid Support Forces.

“The situation for refugees and internally displaced people is absolutely dire. There is a lack of health support. There is a lack of shelter and protection activities are really stretched,” said Saltmarsh.

He said one of the UNHCR’s major concerns at the moment are the massive human rights abuses, particularly in the Darfur region.

The conflict has caused huge displacement, with over 1 million people forced to flee the country and over 3 million more displaced internally.

“It’s a very difficult situation because access for humanitarians is very challenging within Sudan. Even on the borders in countries like Chad and South Sudan, Central African Republic, logistically getting to those places and getting assistance and protection activities in has been extremely difficult,” said the UNHCR spokesman.

He pointed out that a lack of funding was a huge concern as Sudan is “a huge country with multiple borders, where providing humanitarian support is very expensive.”

- Winter and the future

Saltmarsh said the coming winter is another major challenge for global refugees as the need for shelter, warm clothes and other resources becomes much more critical.

“It’s important that those refugees who are in such situations, that are going to be suffering winter conditions, are given the support that they need,” he said.

“We talk about the displaced inside Afghanistan, that’s a huge humanitarian crisis. The Afghan refugees who are in Iran and Pakistan … those in Ukraine in particular and in the Middle East … the Syrian refugees who have been displaced for well over a decade now, in many cases, and the conditions have been deteriorating and needs are rising.”

Poverty levels are also increasing, he added, which “is a big concern in terms of next year.”

Saltmarsh said UNHCR will host the Global Refugee Forum next month in Geneva, with refugees, heads of UN agencies, heads of state and governments, to focus on solutions.

For the coming year, he said the main hope is that there can be a resolution to many of the conflicts plaguing the world.

“We always try to be optimistic and hope that there’s resolution to many of these conflicts that we’ve seen, and that protracted situations … can be relieved, and that we don’t see conflagration of new conflicts, but it’s impossible to say what next year is going to bring,” he concluded.
How climate change is contributing to migration out of North Africa

Nov 28, 2023
PBS NEWSHOUR
By —Sarah Cutler, Columbia Journalism Fellow
By —Casey Kuhn


Ilaria Manunza has seen floods in Niger get more intense and more frequent in recent years.

For a place so reliant on agriculture, a changing climate presents significant challenges, especially against a backdrop of fractured governance and an already vulnerable economy. Changing weather patterns have contributed to instability that has driven conflict between farmers and herders competing for scarce resources there, said Manunza, the Niger country director for Save the Children. She’s seen many in rural areas surviving day by day, with few reserves or backup plans to bounce back from climate shocks, she said.

“The floods wash away the crops. They have to start again, over and over. There are no food stocks in case of a drought,” Manunza said.

With few options, thousands of people from the Sahel — many of them under 25 — leave Niger each month in an effort to reach Europe, often to travel to North Africa with the aim of crossing the Mediterranean Sea.

As of July 2023, migrant departures from Libya to Europe were at their highest point since 2017. The majority were from Niger, Egypt, Sudan, Chad and Nigeria, according to the European Union. Climate change is pushing up temperatures across the globe, especially in the Sahel region, as detailed by a 2021 U.N. report focused on climate change and migration.

Highly dependent on climate-sensitive livelihoods like herding and agriculture, countries in the Sahel region of Africa are some of the most vulnerable yet lowest carbon-emitting countries in the world, said Tom Ellison, Deputy Director of the Center for Climate and Security.

“They’re very high on the list of countries who are heavily affected by, but least responsible for climate change,” he said.

WATCH: Investigation reveals rampant environmental and human rights abuses at sea

Manunza has witnessed these changes firsthand in Niger.Historically, most Nigeriens survived through subsistence farming, or as pastoralists raising cattle. But rapid swings between flooding and drought are making that increasingly difficult. It’s also heightened conflict as farmers try to expand their land and herders travel farther to find grazing land for their animals.

“You have rainfall patterns that are not real patterns anymore,” Manunza said. And after a drought, “even if it rains, it doesn’t mean that the land will be fertile. If it floods, it washes away everything, meaning that pasture may not be available where traditionally it used to be.”

Increasingly erratic climate patterns — and other factors, like conflict and weak governance — have fueled food insecurity in Niger for years. Forty-five percent of Nigerien children are considered chronically malnourished, according to a July update from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

Many people struggling in rural environments try to migrate first within their own countries, often to an urban area “because there are few other options,” said Alex de Sherbinin, author of the World Bank’s 2018 Groundswell Report on climate migration.

But “urban areas are not lands of opportunity for people,” he said. “You go to an urban area and you’re basically stuck in some kind of informal sector position, hawking stuff on the street, or trying to piece together a living. And I think that this propels some youth to say, ‘I gotta risk it all’” and leave the country, he said.

Climate change is one of many factors that influence migration, Ellison and other experts who study migration and climate change note, and it can be difficult to isolate and track.

Some studies ask migrants, “‘Why are you traveling?’ and it’s fairly rare for them to say ‘climate change,’ right?” Ellison said. “But they might say something like, ‘well, I couldn’t make a living,’ or ‘my neighborhood is too violent.’ And climate change certainly has an impact on things like agricultural livelihoods, or conflict.”

Climate change is “best understood as a shaping factor — a structural factor that can contribute to some of the more proximate causes of migration.

Climate change is “best understood as a shaping factor — a structural factor that can contribute to some of the more proximate causes of migration,” he said. “I don’t think most experts would say that climate change is typically the direct cause of migration except, perhaps, in the case of an acute disaster like a hurricane.”

Historically, Niger has itself been a host to thousands of migrants from surrounding countries — some passing through, others pausing to work in the country before continuing their journey to Europe. Traditionally, the country welcomed these migrants, but as its own resources have been strained, tension has grown.

READ MORE: Climate change is already fueling global migration. The world isn’t ready to meet people’s changing needs, experts say

“Lack of sanitation, lack of water, extreme weather — it’s easy to understand how these can lead to conflict between the local community and migrants,” Manunza said.

A country like Niger, one of the lowest-emitting countries in the world, needs financial support for climate adaptation, Ellison said — helping its urban areas better accommodate large numbers of people moving in from rural areas, for example, or adapting farming techniques, or helping to resolve conflicts between farmers and herders.

Looking at current migration trends in the Mediterranean, Ian Urbina, director of the Outlaw Ocean Project, which has reported extensively on the peril of migrants crossing the Mediterranean, had grim predictions for how all of these compounding issues would play out.

“I think it’s also a forecast, in the sense that a lot of the very people that are crossing this watery desert are a sign of what’s to come in terms of climate migration,” he said. “Large numbers of especially desperate people willing to buy their way with traffickers, boats and across borders — that’s only going to increase with climate change.”

The PBS NewsHour's Nicole Ellis spoke with Ian Urbina and Médecins Sans Frontières, or Doctors Without Borders' search and rescue representative, Juan Matias Gil, about the harrowing journey many migrants face.




By —Casey Kuhn is a producer for NewsHour's digital video team. She has won several awards for her work in broadcast journalism, including a national Edward R. Murrow award.@caseyatthedesk
ICYMI COP28
'Cartoonishly villainous' Saudi plot to hook poor nations on oil exposed

Jessica Corbett, Common Dreams
November 29, 2023

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (AFP)

With the world hurtling toward catastrophic temperature rise, "Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is overseeing a sweeping global investment program" intended to "ensure that emerging economies across Africa and Asia become vastly more dependent on oil" even as the international community tries to phase out planet-heating fossil fuels.

That's according to a sixth-month undercover investigation by the U.K.'s Center for Climate Reporting (CCR) and Channel 4 News, based on regulatory filings, documents from Saudi officials, and secret recordings.

The findings were published Monday in the leadup to the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP28) set to kick off Thursday in the United Arab Emirates.

As CCR detailed:

The Oil Demand Sustainability Program (OSP) is a vast government program with dozens of projects aimed at embedding a high-carbon, fossil fuel-dependent development model in countries across Africa and Asia. This includes meticulously researched plans to drive a major increase in gasoline and diesel-fueled vehicles and boost jet fuel sales via increased air travel.

It brings together the most powerful arms of the Saudi state, including the $700 billion Saudi Public Investment Fund; the world's largest oil company, Saudi Aramco; petrochemicals giant, Sabic; and the kingdom's most important ministries—all under the auspices of the crown prince's supreme committee of hydrocarbon affairs.

When asked by an undercover reporter whether the aim of the program is to artificially stimulate oil demand to counter global efforts to reduce oil consumption and tackle climate change, a Saudi official responded: "Yes... it is one of the main objectives that we are trying to accomplish."

Saudi Arabia's Ministry of Energy—which did not respond to a request for comment—mainly "characterizes the OSP as a sustainable development initiative" to aid developing countries, CCR reported.

However, as the center highlighted, key pieces of the kingdom's plot include plans to promote oil-based power generation, deploy petrol and diesel vehicles in Africa and Asia, work with a global auto manufacturer to make a cheap car, lobby against government subsidies for electric vehicles, and fast-track commercial supersonic air travel.

Power Shift Africa director Mohamed Adow told CCR that "the Saudi government is like a drug dealer trying to get Africa hooked on its harmful product. The rest of the world is cleaning up its act and weaning itself off dirty and polluting fossil fuels and Saudi Arabia is getting desperate for more customers and is turning its sights on Africa."

"It's like the tobacco companies that knew the addictive and lethal nature of cigarettes yet continued to get millions of teenagers hooked on them," Adow added, "it's repulsive."

Rapid Transition Alliance coordinator Andrew Simms similarly said on social media, "Straight outta the tobacco companies' playbook."

The Saudi investigation was released on the same day that the center and BBCrevealed that Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber, CEO of the UAE's Abu Dhabi National Oil Company and president of COP28, used meetings about the summit to push for foreign fossil fuel deals.

"This undermines essential impartiality and the integrity of the talks, and will accelerate devastating global heating," said the Environmental Justice Foundation, pointing to both revelations. "These backroom deals serve wealthy nations and fossil fuel profiteers at the expense of everyone else."

Also noting both reports, American author and climate activist Bill McKibben wrote Tuesday that "the new documents, which really must be read to be believed, perform the same essential task as the revelations almost a decade ago about Exxon's climate lies. They end any pretense that these countries are engaged in good-faith efforts to wind down the industry."

"It's difficult, I think, to imagine anything much more systemically evil than this spate of bids by the oil companies and oil countries to keep wrecking the planet; it's akin to the way that tobacco companies, facing legal losses in the U.S., pivoted to expand their markets in Asia instead," he added, describing the Saudi plot as "almost cartoonishly villainous."

The kingdom has a long history of impeding climate action—particularly progress at global talks, as three experts laid out in a paper released last week by the Climate Social Science Network at the Institute at Brown for Environment and Society.

"Saudi delegations to the U.N. climate talks are highly skilled, well-organized, and have been extremely successful over decades at slowing the efforts of the world community on climate change to a crawl," the trio wrote. "Saudi Arabia's actions should be seen as part of a wider web of obstruction to an effective response to climate change, which includes fossil fuel industry groups and other (predominantly U.S.-based) political lobbyists and elites, and allied intergovernmental organizations."

As Common Dreamsreported last week, the U.N. has allowed at least 7,200 delegates for fossil fuel companies and industry trade groups to attended climate talks since 2003. This year, attendees must disclose their affiliation under new transparency rules.

The summit comes as scientists warn that 2023 is projected to be the hottest year in 125,000 years and currently implemented emissions policies will likely lead to 3°C of temperature rise by the end of the century—or double the 1.5°C goal of the Paris agreement.

"Leaders must act to limit global temperature rise to 1.5°C, protect people from climate chaos, and end the fossil fuel age," United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres declared Monday. "They must make COP28 count."
Grizzlies once roamed the Cascades; some people want them to return

2023/11/29
Restoring grizzly bears to Washington’ s North Cascades is again under consideration. - Dreamstime/Dreamstime/TNS


LONG READ


STETATTLE CREEK, North Cascades — Bubbles tumbled and danced on the surface of this creek as stones interrupted the flow of the aquamarine water, once home to spring Chinook and steelhead, below the bank where Scott Schuyler and his daughter Janelle walked in early November.

Stetattle was derived from stəbtabəl' (stub-tahb-elh), or grizzly bear, in the Lushootseed language spoken by the Upper Skagit people who lived on these lands for at least 10,000 years.

But grizzlies haven't lived here for decades.

Today, federal agencies have offered up three potential plans for grizzlies' future in the North Cascades; two include reintroducing the bears to the area. Indigenous nations in support of the effort point to the bears' long-rooted history and human coexistence in the region that far predates European settlement. Other tribes have joined large landowners like ranchers in opposing the effort, arguing a return of the apex predator would threaten their current way of life.

"I've had conversations with friends who are avid hikers up and down the North Cascades and they have their strong opinions — they don't want bears encroaching on their recreational time," said Janelle Schuyler, a young member of the Upper Skagit Indian Tribe and an environmental activist who has led efforts to restore Skagit River salmon. "I just view it completely differently. We're in their homeland."

She envisions a future here where healthy salmon, bears and people again coexist.

But some worry that window has passed.

"We're advocating for the way of life we have currently," said Nino Maltos II, chair of the Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe. "We'd like to see more salmon, to bring those numbers back. But this is putting an obstacle in our everyday lives."

As debate ensues in the U.S., the bears could be reintroduced in the Canadian portions of the North Cascades as soon as next year and will almost certainly wander across the international border.

"Impossible to separate them"

Upper Skagit peoples' origin story says the transformer came to the upper reaches of the Skagit River, here in Stetattle Valley, made the conditions right to support the people and gifted the people with the ability to communicate with animals.

For thousands of years, Upper Skagit people followed networks of trails through dense, towering ancient cedars and Douglas fir to gather berries, roots and cedar bark through this valley.

A spear point, estimated to be up to 9,000 years old, was unearthed here in the North Cascades. This long-rooted history is also evident in the curling trunks of cedars where bark was harvested to make clothing, cooking baskets and fishing nets.

They would hunt mountain goats for food and use the wool for blankets. Deer and elk provided meat and the skins were made into clothing. And sometimes, they would hunt grizzlies. Upper Skagit people saw them as spiritual beings that conferred hunting prowess on those who possessed the bear's guardian spirit.

Grizzlies roamed much of the West before colonization. A keystone species, bears are known to till and aerate soil as they search for potato-like roots like Alpine sweetvetch, munch on berries, and later deposit the seeds through their scat. The omnivores love to snatch big, juicy salmon from the river and will steal kills from other predators.

In just over a century — the blink of an eye in geologic time — this land, and humans' relationship with it, was transformed. Settlers built the mighty Skagit into a machine river — dammed to allow people to control the stop and start of its flows — to serve electricity to populations more than 100 miles away. Salmon and oceangoing trout were severed from these pristine reaches of the river.

Over time, white settlers wiped the creek's namesake bears off the landscape, too. Beginning in the mid-1800s, they killed more than 3,000 for their pelts while miners and homesteaders killed countless others. The big brown bears, with a hump of heavy muscle in their shoulders, never bounced back.

No one knows how many grizzly bears remain. The last verified sighting in the U.S. North Cascades was more than two decades ago, and only two sightings have been verified on the British Columbia side of the mountains since.

Some of the best intact grizzly habitat still remains here. It includes vast protected wilderness, habitat for dens and hundreds of species of plants, animals and insects the bears feast on.

Scientists have found that under several climate change scenarios, future habitat quality remains the same or slightly improved in the North Cascades, offering enough to support up to 289 female bears. Projected declines in snowpack would result in a decrease in vegetation at the highest elevations, but an increase in grizzly bear foraging habitat in high-elevation meadows.

The bears' primary threat remains humans. Up to 85% of bear deaths across British Columbia, Alberta, Washington, Idaho and Montana have come from human action.

Upper Skagit people coexisted and coevolved with the bears for at least 10,000 years. Today, Scott Schuyler, a policy representative for the tribe who often leads negotiations on conservation efforts, and other Upper Skagit leaders are passionate advocates for plans to reintroduce the bears to the North Cascades.

"It's very powerful to be here in this area where our ancestors once lived," Schuyler said, as the Skagit River twisted and churned past the stone he balanced his boots on. "And hopefully again, we'll see restoration occur not only for the grizzly bear, but for the river, too."

"The tribe's history, culture and identity is so intertwined with Grizzly Bears and the [North Cascades Ecosystem] that it is impossible to separate them," Marilyn Scott, chair of the Upper Skagit, wrote to the National Park Service.

Some tribes — including Spokane, Kootenai, Coeur d'Alene, and the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation — also consider the grizzly bear sacred, and in 2016 signed a treaty of solidarity aimed to protect and reintroduce grizzly bears across their historic range.

As the public comment period closed on three potential options for the bears' future this month, federal agencies are drawing up a final plan. It's slated to be presented this spring.

Under both reintroduction options outlined in the plan, about three to seven grizzly bears would be released into the North Cascades each year over the course of five to 10 years. The goal is to establish an initial population of 25 grizzly bears.

One option outlined in the plan would allow grizzly bears to be managed as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act, and permit some to be captured, moved or killed only under specific circumstances, like the defense of life and scientific or research activities.

The second is looser and would allow landowners to call on the federal government to remove bears if they pose a threat to livestock, for instance.

"Where a lot of us live"

About 43 miles downstream, the 300-person Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe is nestled in the foothills of the North Cascades near the lumber town of Darrington and next to the Sauk River, where leaders waved from the grassy banks near their homes to fishermen paddling an inflatable boat.

The tribe has been vocal in opposition to the reintroduction of grizzlies.

"They love feasting on the spawning grounds," Chair Nino Maltos II said. "The spawning grounds happen to be right behind where a lot of us live."

The tribe has fought David-and-Goliath-esque court battles to challenge the lack of fish passage at Seattle City Light's dams on the Skagit River, and participated in efforts to restore dozens of acres of salmon habitat and to monitor and recover mountain goat and elk populations.

But in the case of the bears, members are advocating for their current way of life, Maltos said. The bears' return would feel like an additional obstacle to exercising their treaty rights — gathering berries, fishing and hunting — in the mountains, said Demi Maltos, who sits on the tribal council.

Things have changed a lot since the bears were functionally extirpated from the area. About two dozen mountain goats remain near Darrington, and six elk, according to Michael Grant, wildlife biologist for the tribe. Fish are in decline. So is the tribe's population.

"Pre-contact, we were 8,000 people," Sauk-Suiattle Councilmember Kevin Lenon said. "We are more endangered as a Native people than these apex predators."

Leaders are fearful of the bears reentering an ecosystem humans have since encroached on. They're nervous about living in the bears' backyards, and the risks of encounters while they exercise their treaty rights, though statistical chances cited in National Park Service data are low.

The small tribe isn't alone.

The Obama administration announced in August 2014 a three-year process to study grizzly reintroduction. In 2017, Department of the Interior officials, without clear explanation, halted progress on the recovery efforts.

The effort was reignited in 2018 by then-Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke and subsequently scrapped in a 2020 meeting in Omak, led by new Interior Secretary David Bernhardt with Rep. Dan Newhouse, R-Sunnyside, and leaders of agricultural groups alongside him.

Ranchers have been among the most vocal opponents along the way.

In 1993, they commandeered an infamously contentious public meeting in Okanogan County, where ranchers expressed concern about the risk of grizzly bear attacks on livestock. Thirty years later, Okanogan County residents expressed similar sentiments at a federal public meeting Oct. 30.

But this go at bringing the bears back, federal agencies are offering an option that would designate the bears as a nonessential experimental population and give agencies "greater management flexibility should conflict situations arise."

Under that designation, some of the rules under the Endangered Species Act are relaxed, creating potential for landowners to receive federal permission to kill or relocate a bear and avoid punishment if done accidentally in certain situations.

"They just can't recover on their own"

Meanwhile, just north of the U.S. border, the Okanagan Nation Alliance's efforts to recover the bears, known to the Syilx (silks) people as kiɁlawnaɁ (kee-law-naw), are underway.

About a decade ago, the Chiefs Executive Council declared grizzly bears endangered and protected in Syilx Territory, and mandated the Okanagan Nation Alliance to take recovery actions, particularly in the North Cascades. In 2018, they passed a resolution pledging to work with neighboring First Nations to recover the bears in Southwest British Columbia.

"The reality is, the normal for the landscape is to have grizzly bears on it," said Cailyn Glasser, Okanagan Nation Alliance natural resources manager. "It's not new. What's new and strange for that ecosystem is not having grizzlies for the last 50 or 70 years."

The connection between Syilx people and grizzlies goes back millennia, Glasser said in a phone call. Grizzly Bear is the caretaker of all of the resources on the landscape. People, like the bears, depend on huckleberries, and salmon and other shared resources. The bears are the stewards — their existence is imperative to the health of the ecosystem, Glasser said.

Okanagan Nation Alliance leaders have since worked with elders, knowledge keepers, hunters and gatherers from Syilx member communities to understand and preserve traditional knowledge about kiɁlawnaɁ, to better understand the species' habitat needs and begin work to preserve st̕xałq, or black huckleberry, that the bears rely on.

They will soon launch an education campaign centered on grizzlies' role on the landscape, and the history of humans' coexistence with other charismatic predators.

In the mid-1990s, about seven decades after the last wolf pack was killed in Yellowstone National Park, officials relocated 31 gray wolves from western Canada to the park. It was an effort championed by the National Park Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, researchers and environmental groups, and at the time received the largest number of public comments on any federal proposal — only to be challenged by grizzlies in the North Cascades.

From 1995 to 2003 officials found wolves preyed on livestock outside the park much less than expected, killing 256 sheep and 41 cattle. The wolves caused a "trophic cascade" of ecological change; the decrease in elk population helped increase beaver populations and bring back aspen and other vegetation.

The bears could be moved into the Canadian portion of the North Cascades Ecosystem as soon as next year, but it's recognized that partnership and collaboration with government partners, on both sides of the border, is important.

Glasser said Okanagan leaders hope to operate as a transboundary team alongside those leading the efforts in the U.S. They may not amend their plans based on what's happening south of the border, but leaders want to collaborate, if possible.

If the bears were to wander south across the international border — as they most certainly will — and establish a population before U.S. agencies establish their rule to provide management flexibility, the U.S. would lose that ability, said U.S. Fish & Wildlife spokesperson Andrew LaValle.

"On both sides of the border, grizzly bears were persecuted at a rate that decimated the population," Glasser said. "They just can't recover on their own."

© The Seattle Times

Map of the Cascade Range in the Pacific Northwest showing geographic locations, approximate extent of Western (tan) and High Cascades (purple), and the spatial relationships of some major structural features in Oregon. Note that the names Western Cascades and High Cascades are not used in Washington or south of Mount Shasta in California. The study area is shown by a red polygon in north-central Oregon. The numerals 1, 2, and 3 refer to the three segments of the High Cascades graben from south to north: 1) southern segment, 2) central segment, and 3) Hood River graben segment. Labels: BFZ -Brothers fault zone; BV -Boring Volcanic Field; EDFZEugene-Denio fault zone; HRF -Hood River fault zone; HCF -Horse Creek fault zone; GCF -Gales Creek fault; GRF -Green Ridge fault zone; PB -Portland Basin; PHF -Portland Hills fault; MCB -Middle Columbia Basin (orange outline); MHFZ -Mount Hood fault zone; MFZ -Mount McLoughlin fault zone; OWL -Olympic-Wallowa Lineament; SFZ -Sisters fault zone; SV -Simcoe Mountains; TB -Tualatin Basin; VFZ -Vale fault zone. Oregon physiographic provinces after Dicken (1965). Geologic provinces of Washington from the Washington Geological Survey (https://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/geology/explore-popular-geology/geologic-provinceswashington).

Editorial: The Right against rights: Far-right victories should concern us all

2023/11/28
Carl Court/Getty Images North America/TNS

A shock result in Dutch elections handed the largest number of the country’s parliamentary seats to the party of extreme right, isolationist, anti-immigrant and Islamophobic longtime political gadfly Geert Wilders last week. He vowed that the country would be “returned to the Dutch.”

Wilders might be a relative unknown to most Americans, but he’s certainly a known quantity among those who’ve tracked and studied the rise of the global far-right. The virulent xenophobe and Euro-skeptic was something of a template for a new class of new authoritarian, less polished and martial than those who came before, with a focus on immigration and a knack for connecting with and radicalizing online right-wing communities, complete with weird hair and some kind of private-sector background.

Wilders is sometimes called the Dutch Trump, but the reality is he was Trump before Trump was. He’s been a parliamentarian since 1998, and founded his Party for Freedom in 2006. His rhetoric and positions have changed little over the years. He’s not a fresh-faced populist who came out of nowhere to pull the wool over the electorate’s eyes; people knew what he was about.

Many observers dismissed the possibility that Wilders would ever wield real power. What has changed is the electorate, which around the world has become increasingly tolerant or even supportive of far-right political movements.

Less than a week prior to the Dutch elections, the far-right libertarian Javier Milei swept to decisive victory in the Argentine presidential election. Amid a faltering economy, the economist and onetime TV pundit — beloved by bookers for his ratings-boosting railing against the government — promised, essentially, to burn it all down, dissolving the central bank, ditching the currency and engaging in a program of massive spending cuts.

Many Argentines openly acknowledged that they had no idea how this was all going to pan out, but they just wanted change, and Milei was going to deliver it.

The same desire for someone to come in and fix everything, to stick it to the political system, is what led voters to opt for Giorgia Meloni’s far-right government in Italy last year and to give the far-right Finns Party a sizable chunk of the Finnish governing coalition.

It is what is leading the mainstream GOP, with the support of the majority of Republican voters, to coalesce around Donald Trump despite his contempt for American democracy and effort to overthrow it, his plans to weaponize the levers of government to his advantage and, crucially, his total failure to actually bring safety or prosperity to the American public.

It is perhaps this latter point that’s most infuriating, as all the evidence to the contrary rarely convinces people that these far-right movements won’t deliver what they promise. They prey on dissatisfaction with a changing world and a seemingly indifferent elite, and not every one of their critiques and grievances are manufactured; things like stagnant wages, unresponsive bureaucracies and the encroaching power of tech and corporate consolidation are real issues.

Yet their solutions — to blame and go after immigrants, cut government functions, vilify LGBTQ people and return to some imagined more moral past — are no solutions at all. The antidote to their venom must be an informed citizenry that can reject the snake oil. It can’t come soon enough.

___

© New York Daily News


Europe’s largest party leader warns of far-right parliament unless EU handles migration


European People’s Party President Manfred Weber urged leaders to finalize the migration deal.


President of the European People's Party (EPP)  
Manfred Weber 
| Julien Warnand/EFE via EPA

BY BARBARA MOENS AND CLAUDIA CHIAPPA
NOVEMBER 28, 2023 11:21 PM CET

European People’s Party President Manfred Weber on Tuesday warned the EU must get a handle on migration if it wants to avoid a far-right surge across the continent.

“If we do not find the solution or proper common understanding how to manage migration, then I’m very worried about the next European elections,” he said at a POLITICO event.

Weber pointed to the Dutch elections — where far-right populist Geert Wilders landed a surprise win last week — as an example, talking about how “a tiny, small detail … created the fall of the government.”

Similarly, the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) in Germany has been gaining ground, propelled by migration concerns, something Weber calls “great shock and a matter of concern.”

On the European level, Weber urged countries to finalize the migration deal.

“We have to bring it alive,” he said. “People must see that we are not only talking about migration, that we are not only appealing to solve the problems, but we are really capable to make legislation and really find a solution on European level to stop illegal arrivals on European soil.”






UPDATE
US agency to end use of ‘cyanide bomb’ to kill coyotes and other predators, citing safety concerns


This 2016 image provided by Mark Mansfield shows his son Canyon Mansfield and dog Kasey playing in the grass in Pocatello, Idaho. The boy was seriously injured in 2017 and his dog was killed when a cyanide device that is used to kill coyotes and other predators emitted a cloud of poison while they were hiking near their home. The Bureau of Land Management made public its decision to end the use of the devices on public lands Wednesday, Nov. 22, 2023.
 (Mark Mansfield via AP)

This March 16, 2017, file photo released by the Bannock County Sheriff’s Office shows a cyanide device in Pocatello, Idaho. Citing public safety concerns, the Bureau of Land Management is ending the use of spring-loaded booby traps planted on public lands that eject cyanide powder when triggered to kill coyotes and other livestock predators, a practice wildlife advocates and others have been trying to outlaw for decades.
 (Bannock County Sheriff’s Office via AP, File)

In this March 17, 2017 file photo, Canyon Mansfield holds the collar of his dog, Casey, who was killed March 16 by a cyanide-ejecting device placed on public land by federal workers to kill coyotes near his home in Pocatello, Idaho. Citing public safety concerns, the Bureau of Land Management is ending the use of spring-loaded booby traps planted on public lands that eject cyanide powder when triggered to kill coyotes and other livestock predators, a practice wildlife advocates and others have been trying to outlaw for decades. 
(Jordon Beesley/The Idaho State Journal via AP, File)

This Sept. 10, 2019 image provided by Predator Defense shows Theresa Mansfield, left, and Brooks Fahy, executive director of Predator Defense, outside a U.S. Department of Agriculture supply depot in Pocatello, Idaho. Mansfield’s son was seriously injured when a cyanide device used to kill coyotes and other predators emitted a cloud of poison while he was hiking with his dog in 2017. The Bureau of Land Management made public its decision to end the use of the devices on public lands Wednesday, Nov. 22, 2023. (Predator Defense via AP)

BY SCOTT SONNER
 November 28, 2023

RENO, Nev. (AP) — The U.S. Bureau of Land Management has halted the use of spring-loaded traps that disperse cyanide powder to kill coyotes and other livestock predators, a practice wildlife advocates have tried to outlaw for decades due to safety concerns.

The M-44 ejector-devices that critics call “cyanide bombs” have unintentionally killed thousands of pets and non-predator wildlife, including endangered species, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Wildlife Services. They have a scented bait and emit a poisonous cloud when triggered by a physical disturbance.

The Bureau of Land Management quietly posted a notice on its website last week that it no longer will use the devices across the 390,625 square miles (1,011,714 square kilometers) it manages nationally — an area twice the size of California — much of it where ranchers graze cattle and sheep.

Other federal agencies — including the National Park Service, and the Fish and Wildlife Service — already prohibit the devices. But the Forest Service and 10 states still use them in some form.

Eight unsuccessful bills have been introduced in Congress since 2008 to ban the the traps on federal and/or state lands. Sponsors of legislation pending in the U.S. House and Senate that would ban them on both say they’re optimistic the bureau’s new position will help pave the way for broader support.

Brooks Fahy, executive director of the Oregon-based watchdog group Predator Defense, has been working for 40 years to ban the use of sodium cyanide in the traps. He emphasized that it’s registered under the Environmental Protection Agency as a Category 1 toxicant, the highest level of toxicity.

“I can’t believe they’re still being put on the landscape and they continue to harm people,” Fahy said. “I’ve seen M-44s set right on the edge of a trail.”

M-44s consist of a stake driven into the ground with a spring and canister loaded with the chemical. Marked inconsistently and sometimes not at all, humans have mistaken them for sprinkler heads or survey markers.

Federal agencies rely on Wildlife Services to deal with problem animals — whether in remote areas or airports across the country — using lethal and non-lethal forces. The change on Bureau of Land Management land came under a recent revision of a memorandum of understanding with Wildlife Services obtained by The Associated Press on Monday.

It’s effective immediately but can be canceled by either side with 60 days’ notice.

Wildlife Services has used M-44s to control predators, mostly in the West, since the 1930s. The American Sheep Industry Association and National Cattlemen’s Beef Association were among 100 industry groups that wrote to Congress this year, stressing the importance of the program. They said predators cause more than $232 million in livestock losses annually.

About a dozen people have been seriously harmed over the past 25 years by M-44s on federal lands, according to Predator Defense.

Between 2000-16, Wildlife Services reported 246,985 animals killed by M-44s, including at least 1,182 dogs. From 2014-22, the agency said M-44s intentionally killed 88,000 animals and unintentionally killed more than 2,000 animals .

Public outcry over the devices grew after a family dog was killed in 2017 in Pocatello, Idaho, and Canyon Mansfield, then 14, was injured after accidentally triggering a device placed on public land about 400 feet (122 meters) from their home. In 2020, the federal government admitted negligence and agreed to pay the family $38,500 to resolve a lawsuit.

“We are so happy to finally see one federal government department banning another’s reckless and indiscriminate actions,” Canyon Mansfield’s father, Mark Mansfield, said last week.

Democratic Rep. Jared Huffman, of California, who is the lead sponsor of the bill that would outlaw use of M-44s on all state and federal lands, has named the current version “Canyon’s Law,” after Mansfield.

“Cyanide bombs are a cruel and indiscriminate device that have proven to be deadly for pets, humans, and wildlife – and they have no business being on our public lands,” Huffman said last week in praising the bureau’s mov
e.

Democratic Sen. Jeff Merkley, of Oregon, who is the lead sponsor of companion legislation in the Senate, said he’s encouraged the Biden administration is “taking a positive step forward to keep cyanide bombs off of our public lands.”

Fahy acknowledged efforts in Congress to ban the use of M-44s have gained little traction over the past 15 years.

But he said publicity over the Mansfield case has changed the political landscape more than anything he’s seen since 1982 when President Ronald Reagan revoked an executive order issued by President Richard Nixon in 1972 that had banned use of all poisons by federal agents on federal lands.

Several weeks after Canyon Mansfield was poisoned, Fahy said Wildlife Services agreed to stop using M-44s in Idaho. Two years later, Oregon banned them statewide and a partial ban soon followed in New Mexico where some state agencies can still use them.

Colorado, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Texas, West Virginia and Wyoming also still allow M-44s.

Fahy said the new policy at the Bureau of Land Management — which specifically referenced the Mansfield case last week — “is a big deal” that should help build on the momentum for a nationwide ban.

“This is the most that the needle on the use of federal poisons has moved in over 40 years,” he said. “I think M-44s’ days are numbered.”

Predator Defense - Help Us Ban Deadly M-44 Cyanide Devices
https://plawiuk.blogspot.com/2023/11/the-feds-finally-banned-use-of-cyanide.html

 

Graphic Truth: Where does the US get its online news?

Graphic Truth: Where does the US get its online news?
 Luisa Vieira
Facebook continues to lead the pack for social media sites Americans turn to for news, according to recent polling from the Pew Research Center.

The site has a well-documented history of being a breeding ground for misinformation, which continues to be a topic of concern in Washington with the 2024 election on the horizon.

Pew found that half of US adults get their news from social media at least some of the time, while 30% regularly get their news from Facebook. Next up was YouTube, followed by Instagram, TikTok, and X, formerly known as Twitter. Like Facebook, all of these platforms have also faced issues with the spread of disinformation as well as rampant hate speech.