Tuesday, February 06, 2024

UK
Migrant fruit picker may have been modern slavery victim under Home Office scheme, government finds


Nadine White and Holly Bancroft
Mon, 5 February 2024 

A fruit picker from Bolivia may have been subjected to modern slavery under a government scheme, The Independent can reveal.

Julia Quecano Casimiro was recruited in Chile in 2023 alongside other workers to become a seasonal worker at Haygrove farm in Herefordshire. She came to the UK on a seasonal worker visa, designed to allow people to work picking fruit, vegetables or flowers for up to six months.

In a preliminary ruling, the Home Office has now decided there are reasonable grounds to conclude that Ms Casimiro could have been a victim of modern slavery. Her case will now be investigated further by the government before a final decision is made.


The Independent and The Bureau for Investigative Journalism have previously reported on claims of modern slavery at farms across the UK, which were investigated by the Home Office.

Ms Casimiro, 23, was part of a group of 88 Latin American seasonal fruit pickers who staged the UK’s first ever strike by workers on seasonal visas last July. They claimed that they faced harassment and poor working conditions, such as lack of drinking water.

Haygrove, which has fruit-growing farms in the UK, South Africa and Portugal, has denied all the allegations.

Julia Quecano Casimiro was recruited in Chile in 2023 alongside other workers to become a seasonal worker (UVW)

Ms Casimiro has also brought legal proceedings against the farm at an employment tribunal, claiming harassment and race discrimination with the help of union UVW. Haygrove refute any allegations of bullying or discrimination, saying that they take care to ensure fairness.

She also claims that the farm did not provide the proper safety wear, or provide enough drinking water or toilets on site. Haygrove said that toilets are kept clean, team leaders provide water in all picking fields, and health and safety is taken extremely seriously.

Ms Casimiro, who arrived in the UK in July 2023 from Chile, said the farm had asked her to repay the cost of her flights.

She said: “The email came in about repaying the flights and I said ‘no, this can’t be’, I spoke with several of my friends and we all agreed, this cannot be and all the workers held an urgent meeting”. Haygrove say that workers know from the outset that the company loans them the money for their plane tickets.

Speaking about the living conditions, she said: “The beds were so narrow and the rooms so small that the beds were joined together so it was almost like sharing beds. It was a very, very cramped place. The sofas were dirty and the fridge burnt down and our food rotted.” Haygrove said that the accommodation complies with industry standards and had been audited by the Home Office and the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority.

A recruiter in Chile had promised Ms Casimiro she would earn up to £500 a week picking fruit for the duration of the five-month seasonal worker visa issued to her by the UK government.

But she was given no shifts or pay during her first week in late June. The next week, she made less than £150.

“As soon as I started, I saw that it was exploitation,” she said. “It was modern slavery.”


Ms Casimiro, 23, was part of a group of 88 Latin American seasonal fruit pickers who staged the UK’s first ever strike by workers on seasonal visas last July. (UVW)

Haygrove said that, while workers were told about typical earnings at recruitment events, these were not promised or contracted this amount of work. They explained that during the first week of Ms Casimiro’s time at the farm bad weather meant there was no work available. They said that the “vast majority of the cherry pickers who did remain with us were able to work the typical hours through August, September and October and make commensurate pay” once the weather was better.

For Ms Casimiro and some of her colleagues the tipping point came when they were told to repay the farm £1,500 for the flights that had brought them to the UK – even though receipts show some of the tickets cost a lot less.

Workers were told they would have to repay £250 every week for six weeks on top of accommodation deductions. In Ms Casimiro’s case, she said that would mean being left with only £16 on the weeks when she was given the hours guaranteed by the farm.

Haygrove said workers were told at the outset that plane tickets would be paid through the means of a loan. When made aware of the difference between the loan amount and the true cost of the plane tickets, Haygrove said they only charged workers for the actual value of the tickets.

They said that Ms Casimiro had a paid-for flight home available but did not take it and the farm will not seek to reclaim any flight costs from her.

They said that the majority of workers returned to work after receiving reassurances from Haygrove that weekly earnings would soon increase due to the better weather conditions.

“There’s no way I would have come to the UK if I’d known what was going to happen,” Ms Casimiro told the Bureau of Investigative Journalism (TBIJ).

Haygrove workers would leave their caravans just after 4am before a coach ride of up to two hours to fields on the border with Wales. None of that time was paid, nor was the trip back. Haygrove said that on-site accommodation was available for workers who wished to avoid the daily trip.

Johanna White, solicitor at ATLEU, the firm representing Ms Casimiro, said:“We have received many reports of seasonal workers being subjected to mistreatment including underpayment of wages, no sick leave, and debt bondage where workers have had to pay high upfront travel, visa and recruitment fees in their home countries.

“Julia’s case demonstrates that the current scheme creates a serious risk of labour exploitation, trafficking and modern slavery by placing considerable power in the hands of profit-seeking recruitment companies.”

The UN’s special rapporteur on modern slavery recently said that the UK could be ‘breaching international law’ with the seasonal visa scheme and the Home Office has been found to be failing to investigate “clear indicators of forced labour”.

A conclusive decision on Ms Casimiro’s case is expected next month.

A Haygrove spokesperson said: “The National Referral Mechanism has not determined that Ms Casimiro was a victim of modern slavery or human trafficking.

“Our understanding is that the NRM’s role is to evaluate whether to provide support to Ms Casimiro, but it is not their responsibility to investigate a potential case. We have evidence to demonstrate that Ms Casimiro was not a victim.”

A government spokesperson said: “The welfare of visa holders is of paramount importance, including in the seasonal workers scheme, and we are clamping down on poor working conditions and exploitation.

“The seasonal workers route has been running for four years and each year improvements have been made to stop exploitation and clamp down on poor working conditions while people are in the UK. We will always take decisive action where we believe abusive practices are taking place or the conditions of the route are not met.”
Farmers’ anger forces EU to back down on net zero

PETTY BOURGEOIS REACTIONARIES


Joe Barnes
Tue, 6 February 2024 

Europe has been rocked by continuing protests by farmers who have blocked key roads - REUTERS/Albert Gea

The European Union has caved in to angry protests from farmers and cut a target to slash agricultural emissions as part of the bloc’s net zero drive.

A demand to reduce nitrogen, methane and other emissions linked to farming by almost a third has been removed from a wider Brussels plan to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 90 per cent by 2040.

On Tuesday, Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, also proposed withdrawing the EU’s plan to halve the use of pesticides, calling it a “symbol of polarisation”.

“Our farmers deserve to be listened to,” she told the European Parliament.

“I know that they are worried about the future of agriculture and their future as farmers. But they also know that agriculture needs to move to a more sustainable model of production so that their farms remain profitable in the years to come.”

A recommendation urging EU citizens to eat less meat was also removed from the plan.

The concessions came amid mounting demonstrations by farmers in Belgium, France, Germany and Italy ahead of this year’s EU elections.

Blockades on supermarket distribution centres have left shelves empty in Brussels, while several people have been injured in traffic accidents caused by farmers’ protests in the Netherlands, as they dumped rubbish and set fires on highways.

Organisers have threatened to continue disruption in the lead-up to the elections for the European Parliament in June.

Resistance growing


The ballot is seen as increasingly problematic for Mrs von der Leyen, and other mainstream politicians seeking re-election on a green agenda.

Resistance to the environmental overhaul has been steadily growing, including from the European People’s Party, the centre-Right political group to which commission president belongs.


The move to offer concessions to the farmers would be seen as a major step away from the bloc’s original green plans.


Agriculture was seen as “one of the core areas to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2040”, according to a draft European Commission plan, reported by the Financial Times.

The draft states that policies should now address the entire food sector rather than farming, which accounts for about 10 per cent of the EU’s emissions, “in isolation”.

The EU has pledged to be carbon neutral by 2050, with a first step of cutting emissions by 55 per cent compared with 1990 levels within six years.

Wopke Hoekstra, the EU’s Dutch climate commissioner, warned last month that the bloc had to ensure “our business stay competitive, there is a just transition”.

Eleven EU states, including France, Germany and Spain, have echoed that call in a letter to Brussels, urging a “fair and just transition” that should “leave no one behind, especially the most vulnerable citizens”.

The full plan to reduce emissions ahead of 2040 is to be announced later on Tuesday.

EU Withdraws Push to Cut Pesticide Use After Farmer Protests

Ellen Milligan and Lyubov Pronina
Tue, 6 February 2024 



(Bloomberg) -- European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said she will withdraw a plan to halve the use of pesticides because it became a “symbol of polarization” following protests by farmers across Europe.

The European Union’s executive arm in June 2022 proposed a regulation to slash pesticide use by 50% until 2030 as part of a plan to make farming more sustainable, but the European Parliament voted it down. Fears over falling crop yields and doubts over the ability of farmers to find substitutes and meet targets outweighed concerns about the environmental impact of pesticides.


“Only if we achieve our climate and environmental goals together, will farmers be able to continue to make a living,” von der Leyen said Tuesday during a European Parliament debate in Strasbourg.

The decision followed a wave of protests in France, Belgium and across Europe, with farmers arguing against proposed EU regulations, plans to cut subsidies and free trade deals with countries outside the bloc.

The French government had to promise farmers more financial support and a crackdown on unfair competition as well as tougher checks on the origin of products for them to suspend further blockades. Last week, the EU delayed plans requiring farmers to reserve more of their land fallow to improve biodiversity.

Farmers Bring Protests to Brussels as EU Leaders Meet Nearby

The bloc’s executive finds itself in a balancing act as it rolls out an ambitious climate roadmap on Tuesday to pursue a 90% net emissions reduction by 2040 that will require more sustainable consumer lifestyles and restrictions on businesses and agriculture.

The move to withdraw the pesticides plan is another example of the EU backtracking on legislation aimed at greening the bloc’s economy. The EU had to settle for a watered-down deal on a nature restoration law to return at least 20% of the bloc’s land and sea back to its original state.

The announcement on pesticides demonstrates the commission’s response to criticism as the EU is heading towards elections in June. Last month, von der Leyen kicked off a strategic dialog with the agricultural sector in an effort to placate farmers and show appreciation and respect.

Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo, who during the protests had seen Brussels streets blocked and public monuments vandalized, welcomed the decision. “Crucial we keep our farmers on board,” De Croo wrote in a post on social media platform X.

In time, a new, more mature proposal on pesticides with more stakeholder involvement may be put forward, von der Leyen told the lawmakers, insisting that the discussion over reduced the use of the chemicals will continue.

Bloomberg Businessweek

EU scraps pesticide proposals in another concession to protesting farmers


European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen delivers her speech at European Parliament in Strasbourg, eastern France, Tuesday, Feb. 6, 2024. The European Union’s executive shelved its anti-pesticides proposal Tuesday in yet another concession to farmers after weeks of protests blocked major capitals and economic lifelines across the 27-nation bloc.
 (AP Photo/Jean-Francois Badias)


RAF CASERT
Updated Tue, 6 February 2024 

BRUSSELS (AP) — The European Union’s executive arm shelved an anti-pesticides proposal Tuesday in yet another concession to farmers after weeks of protests blocked major capitals and economic lifelines across the 27-nation bloc.

Although the proposal had languished in EU institutions for the past two years, the move by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen was the latest indication that the bloc is willing to sacrifice environmental priorities to keep the farming community on its side.

Farmers have insisted that measures like the one on pesticides would only increase bureaucratic burdens and keep them behind laptops instead of farming, adding to the price gap between their products and cheap imports produced by foreign farmers without similar burdens.


The pesticides “proposal has become a symbol of polarization,” von der Leyen told the European Parliament in Strasbourg, France. ”To move forward, more dialogue and a different approach is needed.”

She acknowledged that the proposals had been made over the heads of farmers.

“Farmers need a worthwhile business case for nature-enhancing measures. Perhaps we have not made that case convincingly,” von der Leyen said.

It is unclear when new proposals will be drafted. EU parliamentary elections are set for June, and the plight of farmers has become a focal point of campaigning, even pushing climate issues aside over the past weeks.

Under its much-hyped European Green Deal, the EU has targeted a 50% cut in the overall use of pesticides and other hazardous substances by 2030. The proposal was criticized both by environmentalists who claimed it would be insufficient to reach sustainability targets, and by agriculture groups who insisted it would be unworkable and drive farmers out of business.

The decision to shelve the proposal on pesticides represented the EU's latest act of political self-retribution in reaction to protests that have affected the daily lives tens of millions of EU citizens and cost businesses tens of millions of euros due to transportation delays.

Many politicians, especially on the right and its fringes, applauded the impact of the protests.

“Long live the farmers, whose tractors are forcing Europe to take back the nonsense imposed by multinationals and the left,’’ said Italy's right-wing transport minister, Matteo Salvini.

Last week, von der Leyen announced plans to shield farmers from cheaper products exported from wartime Ukraine and to allow farmers to use some land they had been required to keep fallow for environmental reasons.

The European Commission is set to announce more measures late Tuesday on how to reach its stringent targets to counter climate change. Environmentalists fear their could be more concessions there, too.

In France, where the protests gained critical mass, the government promised more than 400 million euros ($436 million) in additional financial support.

Meanwhile, protests continued in many EU nations.

Since early Tuesday morning, farmers across Spain have staged tractor protests, blocking highways and causing traffic jams to demand of changes in EU policies and funds and measures to combat production cost increases. The protests came as the Agriculture Ministry announced some 270 million euros in aid to 140,000 farmers to address drought conditions and problems caused by Russia’s war against Ukraine.

On Monday night, farmers in the Netherlands blocked several roads and highways with their tractors and torched hay bales and tires.

Police in the rural province of Gelderland said they took action against farmers blocking roads, but there were no immediate reports of arrests.

In recent weeks, farmers have protested from Poland to Greece, and from Ireland over Germany to Lithuania.

___

Mike Corder contributed from The Hague, Ciaran Giles from Madrid and Colleen Barry from Milan.


Italy Farmers Protest
Italian farmers protest against EU agricultural policies, near Turin, Italy, Monday Feb. 5, 2024.
 (Fabio Ferrari/LaPresse via AP)

Bulgaria Farmers'Protest
Bulgarian farmers family pour milk on burning hay during farmers protest in front of the Agriculture Ministry in Sofia, Monday, Feb. 5, 2024. Hundreds of angry farmers took to the streets in Bulgaria's capital, Sofia, on Monday to complain of what they call "the total failure" of the government to meet the mounting challenges in the agricultural sector.
(AP Photo/Valentina Petrova)


Greece Europe Farmers
Protesting farmers with their tractors take part in a rally outside the annual Agrotica trade fair in the port city of Thessaloniki, northern Greece, Saturday, Feb. 3, 2024. Greek farmers – hit by rising costs and crop damage caused by recent floods and wildfires – gathered around the conference center hosting the event in the northern city of Thessaloniki to underline their determination to escalate protests over rising production costs by blocking highways. 
(AP Photo/Giannis Papanikos)

Greece  Farmers
Protesting farmers shout slogans as they take part in a rally outside the annual Agrotica trade fair in the port city of Thessaloniki, northern Greece, Saturday, Feb. 3, 2024. Greek farmers – hit by rising costs and crop damage caused by recent floods and wildfires – gathered around the conference center hosting the event in the northern city of Thessaloniki to underline their determination to escalate protests over rising production costs by blocking highways
 (AP Photo/Giannis Papanikos)


European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen delivers her speech at European Parliament in Strasbourg, eastern France, Tuesday, Feb. 6, 2024. The European Union’s executive shelved its anti-pesticides proposal Tuesday in yet another concession to farmers after weeks of protests blocked major capitals and economic lifelines across the 27-nation bloc. 
(AP Photo/Jean-Francois Badias)

Italy Tractors Protest
Manuele Calzoni works at his farm before joining the protest of other farmers near the highway junction, in Orte, Italy, Saturday, Feb. 3, 2024. Farmers have been protesting in various parts of Italy and Europe against EU agriculture policies.
 (AP Photo/Gregorio Borgia)

Greece  Farmers
A farmer takes part in a rally outside the annual Agrotica trade fair in the port city of Thessaloniki, northern Greece, Saturday, Feb. 3, 2024. Greek farmers – hit by rising costs and crop damage caused by recent floods and wildfires – gathered around the conference center hosting the event in the northern city of Thessaloniki to underline their determination to escalate protests over rising production costs by blocking highways. 
(AP Photo/Giannis Papanikos)



UK

Opinion

Does Starmer care that his Gaza stance is angering and repelling Muslim voters? I see no sign that he does


Owen Jones
THE GUARDIAN
Mon, 5 February 2024 

Pro-Palestine protesters near Keir Starmer’s constituency office in Camden, London, 6 January 2024. Photograph: Guy Bell/Rex/Shutterstock

It’s easy to determine the morality of a political party by examining who is welcome and who is not. In Keir Starmer’s Labour, apologists for war crimes rise to the top, while opponents of mass slaughter face the boot. This is not hyperbole. When Israel’s slaughter of Gaza began, Starmer publicly declared that Israel had the right to cut off water and electricity. As a human rights lawyer – who previously argued at the international court of justice (ICJ) that the 1991 Serbian siege of Vukovar constituted genocide – there was no excuse: article 33 of the Geneva conventions, for a start, prohibits collective punishment. Facing an immediate and merited backlash, he sought to claim he had not said what he, in fact, had. “I was saying Israel had the right to self-defence,” he explained. “When I said ‘that right’, it was that right to self-defence. I was not saying Israel had the right to cut off water, food, fuel or medicines – on the contrary.”

Labour MP Kate Osamor, on the other hand, was suspended after referring to Israel’s onslaught as a genocide. She did so on the same day that the world’s highest court recognised the potential for a finding of genocide and ordered Israel to take action to prevent acts of genocide in Gaza. Note that Osamor is left wing, and one of Labour’s few black female MPs: two others have already been sent packing.

These actions have repercussions, and last week it was revealed that Labour has begun to panic over disillusionment among Muslim voters, who represent a significant portion of its electoral coalition, and is preparing an outreach effort. One frontbencher admitted such voters were “no longer a safe voter base for us because of how we initially responded to the war”, meaning “damage control” was all that was left. And why the outreach: to reassure an important and valued constituency, or to shore up the vote? One Labour MP leaves no room for doubt. Labour Muslims are “geographically important”, they said – many live in key target seats.

If Labour wishes to woo Muslim voters, it might consider that many cannot support a party lined up behind what may yet be officially ruled by the ICJ as a genocide. Or a party that has created a hostile environment for those opposed to mass slaughter. After many Muslim Labour councillors quit in disgust over Gaza, one party source boasted it was a sign the party was “shaking off the fleas”. In the tawdry Batley and Spen byelection in 2021 – when Labour barely clung on – a party source claimed it had “lost the conservative Muslim vote over gay rights and Palestine”, but won back Tory voters, showing “we’re reconnecting with the wider electorate again”. Labour figures seemed to delight in the sowing: the reaping is not proving quite as much fun.

The party may conclude that the electoral consequences of this moral bankruptcy will be minimal. But many of its natural voters – not just British Muslims – do care about Gaza, and they have taken note. When the shadow foreign secretary David Lammy last week claimed that “Labour has been clear throughout the conflict that international law must be upheld”, he neglected to mention Starmer’s initial support for the siege, the other shadow cabinet members refusing to condemn cutting off the essentials of life, and his own refusal to condemn forcible displacement, which in the case of Gaza surely amounts to a war crime.

A couple of weeks ago, Starmer dropped Labour’s commitment to unilaterally recognise an independent Palestinian state, saying it would only do so as part of a process towards a two-state solution as an “an appropriate part of the process”. He was then outflanked by Conservative foreign secretary David Cameron, who did not make British recognition contingent on Israel.

Labour’s position has been so pernicious because it has given carte blanche to the government to line up behind Israeli atrocities. When Labour MP Tahir Ali accused Rishi Sunak of having “blood on his hands”, he was forced to apologise or face removal of Labour’s party whip.

The Conservatives are guilty of murderous complicity, through arms sales and diplomatic support for Israel, yet Labour has protected them from paying any political price for it. By late December, 71% of British voters backed an immediate ceasefire, but with Labour lining up behind the government stance, the Tories have been shielded from public pressure.

What, then, of the long-term consequences? Labour will surely win the election thanks to the Tories’ comprehensive self-destruction. But there is no enthusiasm for the Labour leadership, thanks to the absence of a positive domestic agenda and now this moral debacle over Gaza. As the Labour MP and former Blair adviser Jon Cruddas puts it, Labour’s “most rightwing, illiberal faction” is now dominant.

Related: ‘Trust is lost’: Muslim voters unhappy with Labour’s stance on Gaza war

In his leadership pitch to Labour members Starmer pledged to “put human rights at the heart of foreign policy”. Many voters – not just Muslims, but all of those for whom mass slaughter of innocent people doesn’t sit well – have witnessed something else: support for war crimes and failure to condemn them, while opponents of an alleged genocide have been punished and purged.

An administration that lacks meaningful answers to domestic crises and is wedded to a toxic foreign policy will soon find itself in trouble. Look at Starmer’s political equivalents in the US, Germany and Australia: they won but swiftly became unpopular, and none U-turned so comprehensively as him on their original promises. If he enjoys a honeymoon, it will be short-lived.

Owen Jones is a Guardian columnist

Muslim support for Labour falls by almost a third


Nick Gutteridge
Mon, 5 February 2024 

Sir Keir Starmer has been criticised for his stance on the conflict in Gaza
 - JUSTIN TALLIS/AFP via Getty Images

Labour’s support among Muslim voters has collapsed by almost a third since the last election following anger over Sir Keir Starmer’s stance on Gaza.

A shock new poll has found that 60 per cent of Muslim voters plan to support Labour later this year, compared to 86 per cent who backed Jeremy Corbyn in 2019.

The survey, published on Monday, sent shockwaves through Labour, with one MP warning that it showed the party had become “toxic” with Muslims.

It will add to pressure on Sir Keir to change his stance on Gaza and call for a full ceasefire, as demanded by many of his backbenchers.

The Labour leader has faced growing calls to change his approach, with some of his MPs facing challenges from pro-Palestinian candidates at the next election. He toughened his rhetoric in recent weeks with calls for Israel to “end its bombing campaign”.

The polling, carried out by Survation for the Labour Muslim Network, found that support among Muslim voters had dropped by 26 per cent since 2019.

John McDonnell, a former shadow chancellor, said the findings made “sombre reading” but reflected what campaigners were hearing on the ground.

Mish Rahman, a member of the National Executive Committee, Labour’s ruling body, said: “These findings are deeply worrying but unsurprising. For months I have been alarmed by the Labour leadership’s willingness to turn a blind eye to Islamophobia within the party.

“It’s clear that the leadership is not taking this issue seriously. This poll should be a wake-up call to change course before it’s too late.”

He accused Sir Keir of showing a “sheer disregard for Palestinian lives” and of overseeing “mistreatment” of prominent Muslim MPs within the party.

One Labour MP complained that the party had been “outflanked” by the Tories, which was now taking a tougher stance on ending the war in Gaza.

The MP told ITV: “We told the leadership exactly what was happening and how our constituents were feeling about Gaza, and they just weren’t interested. Now we can see that the party is becoming toxic among the British Muslim community.”

Lord Cameron, the Foreign Secretary, suggested last week that the Government could recognise a Palestinian state when the conflict is over. He said he was “determined” to secure a 40-day pause in the fighting, which could be turned “into the ceasefire, into the process, into the solution”.

In contrast, Sir Keir angered Labour MPs after dropping a Corbyn-era policy to recognise a Palestinian state immediately upon entering office.

The Labour leader faced the biggest crisis of his leadership last November when 56 of his own MPs defied the whip to vote in favour of a ceasefire in Gaza.

Ten frontbench resignations, including eight shadow ministers, quit so they could back the motion.

Anger is also still simmering over comments Sir Keir made in October, when he appeared to say that Israel had the right to withhold power and water from Gaza.

He has since insisted that he did not mean to endorse such actions and was answering a wider question about Israel’s right to defend itself.





Japanese trading giant Itochu to cut ties with Israeli defense firm over Gaza war





Juliana Liu and Chie Kobayashi, CNN
Tue, 6 February 2024


One of Japan’s biggest trading firms, Itochu, has decided to end its partnership with a major Israeli defense company due to the war in Gaza.

The sprawling conglomerate, best known outside Japan for its Family Mart chain of convenience stores, said its aviation unit will cut ties with Elbit Systems, which bills itself as Israel’s largest defense contractor, by the end of February.

The decision was made following a January ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) — the top court of the United Nations — and guidance given by Japan’s Foreign Ministry to observe the court’s findings in “good faith,” a spokesperson for Itochu told CNN on Tuesday.

Last month, the ICJ ordered Israel to prevent genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, but stopped short of calling for Israel to suspend its military campaign in the war-torn enclave, as South Africa, which had filed the case to the court, had requested.

The court said Israel must “take all measures” to limit the death and destruction caused by its military campaign, prevent and punish incitement to genocide and ensure access to humanitarian aid

Itochu’s announcement was first made Monday by Tsuyoshi Hachimura, the company’s chief financial officer, during an earnings presentation.

Itochu Aviation, Elbit Systems and Nippon Aircraft Supply signed a cooperation agreement in March 2023, months before war broke out between Israel and Gaza.

Itochu, which reported revenues of $104 billion in 2023, has faced small-scale, student-led protests in Tokyo against its partnership with Elbit since January. Its Family Mart chain has also been the target of calls for boycotts in Muslim-majority Malaysia over the agreement.

Hachimura sought to explain the deal on Monday, telling investors: “The partnership was based on a request from the Japan’s Defense Ministry for the purpose of importing defense equipment for the Self-Defense Force necessary for Japan’s security.”

During a November earnings call, Elbit CEO Bezhalel Machlis said the company had “ramped up production” to support the Israel Defense Forces, which uses its services “extensively.”

— CNN’s Hanako Montgomery and Heather Chen contributed reporting.
UK
Thousands of clothes laid across beach for children killed in Israel-Hamas conflict


Hamish Bailey
Mon, 5 February 2024

Led By Donkeys created a 5km line of children's clothes to represent children killed in the Israel-Gaze conflict. (Image: NQ Staff)

MORE than 11,000 items of children's clothes were laid across Bournemouth beach in remembrance of the children killed in the Israel-Gaza conflict.

Political campaigners Led By Donkeys have laid over 11,000 items of children's clothes across 5km of Bournemouth beach to represent the thousands of children killed in the Israel-Gaza conflict.

The line of clothes spread from near Branksome Chime to Bournemouth Pier and was completed on Monday afternoon.

James Sadri, one of the creators of Led By Donkeys, said: "This is a giant installation aimed to try and visualise the extent of the killing in Gaza. It's incredibly difficult for people to wrap their heads around that over 11,500 children have been killed since October 7.

"This concept is about helping people get to grips with the scale of what is going on and that will hopefully spur them on to lean on their political leaders to get a meaningful ceasefire."

James stated that clothes represent both Palestinian and Israeli children who have died in consequence of the conflict.

Of the clothes, 11,500 represent Palestinian children while 36 represent Israeli.


James said: "We want people to be able to focus on the individual life lost. If you walk along the beach, you can stop and look at one set of clothes that represent one child.

"You can't tell if they're Israeli or Palestinian and that's the point. All children are innocent and we should be treating them as such."

Supported by the BCP Council, all the clothes were eventually removed and will be donated to several children's and homeless charities.

The event was also captured by a helicopter so that the true extent of the line could be captured.

LBD Volunteer Ewan Marshall, 63, said: "It's distressing when you look at it and you hope there is more pressure brought on parties to make peace.

"People have come from all over the place to help with installation because there's a slaughter going on at the moment."

Ewan came with 60 other people on a coach to help create the piece with Bournemouth locals also involved.
Israel forges buffer zone inside Gaza at risk to civilians: experts

Mark Anderson
Sat, February 3, 2024 

Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005, but maintained near complete control over the Palestinian territory's borders
(JACK GUEZ)


Israeli forces in Gaza have systematically destroyed buildings in an attempt to create a buffer zone inside the Palestinian territory, experts and rights groups told AFP, raising fears over the civilian cost.

The plan, not publicly confirmed by Israel, appears to entail taking a significant chunk of territory out of the already tiny Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip, something experts as well as Israel's foreign allies have warned against.

Since Hamas militants stormed across the border on October 7, Israeli forces have targeted structures in Gaza within a kilometre (0.6 miles) of the border, said Adi Ben Nun, a professor at Hebrew University of Jerusalem who has carried out an analysis of satellite imagery.

More than 30 percent of all buildings in that area have been damaged or destroyed during the war, he said.

Last month, the Israeli army's deadliest day since the ground invasion began in late October offered a glimpse of the tactics being used to clear the border area.

Israeli army chief Herzi Halevi said at the time that 21 reservists were killed "during a defensive operation in the area separating the Israeli communities from Gaza" to allow for residents' "safe return".

The troops had laid out explosives to blow up buildings when they were fired upon by militants, the army said.

Displacement of Gazans including from the border area could breach the laws of war, experts said.

"We are seeing mounting evidence that Israel appears to be rendering large parts of Gaza unlivable," said Nadia Hardman, a refugee rights expert at Human Rights Watch.

"One very clear example of that may be the buffer zone -- this may amount to a war crime."

When contacted by AFP, the military declined to comment on the buffer zone.

- 'No right' -

Cecilie Hellestveit, of the Norwegian Academy of International Law, warned of "the prospect of ethnic cleansing, transfer, or lack of rebuilding, so that the Palestinians will eventually be forced out of the area entirely".

Scrutiny of Israel's actions in Gaza is likely to be heightened by last month's International Court of Justice ruling asking Israel to prevent any acts of genocide.

The United States, Israel's top ally and provider of military aid, has repeatedly said Gaza's territory should not change and that a buffer zone would breach that principle.

"When it comes to the permanent status of Gaza... we remain clear about not encroaching on its territory," said US Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

Rights experts said Israel could use parts of its own territory to create a security zone.

"If the Israeli government wants a buffer zone, it has every right to create one in far larger Israel, but it has no right to seize land in Gaza," human rights expert Ken Roth, a professor at Princeton University, said on social media.

Border security has become a priority for many Israelis, experts said, and the return to communities near the Gaza border would be seen as a sign that Hamas no longer posed a threat.

In Nahal Oz, a kibbutz barely a kilometre from Gaza that was targeted in the October 7 attack, artillery fire rang out and smoke billowed over the Palestinian territory in the distance.

Like many Israelis who lived along the border before the attack, nearly all of the kibbutz's 400 residents were evacuated and have yet to return.

"It is still not a place to go back to with children, not yet unfortunately," Eran Braverman, a 63-year-old farmer, told AFP.

"If there really would be such a (buffer) zone... it could help a lot. I hope it happens."

- 'Back' after two decades -

Hamas's attack on Israel resulted in the deaths of around 1,160 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures, with militants also seizing hostages -- dozens of whom Israel says remain in Gaza.

In response, Israel launched a withering offensive that has killed at least 27,238 people in Gaza, mostly women and children, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory.

Israel in 2005 unilaterally withdrew its troops and settlers from Gaza, ending a presence that began in 1967 but maintaining near complete control over the coastal territory's borders.

A narrow no-go area of varying width was maintained along the full length of the Israel-Gaza border, and the zone immediately beyond it on the Palestinian side has been restricted to cropland.

A crippling blockade since Hamas took power in 2007 was followed shortly after the October 7 attack with an Israeli siege of Gaza.

Egypt operates a buffer zone on its side of the border with the narrow Palestinian territory.

Although Israel decided against installing a buffer zone in the early 2000s, the idea has been revived two decades later, said Hellestveit.

"With the war and the reoccupation of Gaza, this plan from when Israel last had control over Gaza militarily has come back on the table," she said.

mca/rsc/dla/jd/ami/tym

1st Russians are fined or jailed over rainbow-colored items after LGBTQ+ 'movement' is outlawed

DASHA LITVINOVA
Updated Mon, February 5, 2024


TALLINN, Estonia (AP) — The first publicly known cases have emerged of Russian authorities penalizing people under a court ruling that outlawed LGBTQ+ activism as extremism, Russian media and rights groups have reported, with at least three people who displayed rainbow-colored items receiving jail time or fines.

The Supreme Court ruling in November banned what the government called the LGBTQ+ “movement” operating in Russia and labeled it as an extremist organization. The ruling was part of a crackdown on LGBTQ+ people in the increasingly conservative country where “traditional family values” have become a cornerstone of President Vladimir Putin's 24-year rule.

Russian laws prohibit public displays of symbols of extremist organizations, and LGBTQ+ rights advocates have warned that those displaying rainbow-colored flags or other items might be targeted by the authorities.

On Monday, a court in Saratov, a city 730 kilometers (453 miles) southeast of Moscow, handed a 1,500-ruble (roughly $16) fine to artist and photographer Inna Mosina over several Instagram posts depicting rainbow flags, Russia's independent news site Mediazona reported. The case contained the full text of the Supreme Court ruling, which named a rainbow flag the “international” symbol of the LGBTQ+ “movement.”

Mosina and her defense team maintained her innocence, according to the reports. Mosina said the posts were published before the ruling, at a time when rainbow flags were not regarded by authorities as extremist, and her lawyer argued that a police report about her alleged wrongdoing was filed before the ruling took force. The court ordered her to pay the fine nonetheless.

Last week, a court in Nizhny Novgorod, some 400 kilometers (248 miles) east of Moscow, ordered Anastasia Yershova to serve five days in jail on the same charge for wearing rainbow-colored earrings in public, Mediazona reported. In Volgograd, 900 kilometers (559 miles) south of Moscow, a court fined a man 1,000 rubles (about $11) for allegedly posting a rainbow flag on social media, local court officials reported Thursday, identifying the man only as Artyom P.



The crackdown on LGBTQ+ rights in Putin's Russia has persisted for more than a decade.

In 2013, the Kremlin adopted the first legislation restricting LGBTQ+ rights, known as the “gay propaganda” law, banning any public endorsement of “nontraditional sexual relations” among minors. In 2020, constitutional reforms pushed through by Putin to extend his rule by two more terms included a provision to outlaw same-sex marriage.

After sending troops into Ukraine in 2022, the Kremlin ramped up a campaign against what it called the West’s “degrading” influence, in what rights advocates saw as an attempt to legitimize the war. That year, the authorities adopted a law banning propaganda of “nontraditional sexual relations” among adults, effectively outlawing any public endorsement of LGBTQ+ people.

Another law passed in 2023 prohibited gender transitioning procedures and gender-affirming care for transgender people. The legislation prohibited “medical interventions aimed at changing the sex of a person,” as well as changing one’s gender in official documents and public records. It also amended Russia’s Family Code by listing gender change as a reason to annul a marriage and adding those “who had changed gender” to a list of people who can’t become foster or adoptive parents.

“Do we really want to have here, in our country, in Russia, ‘Parent No. 1, No. 2, No. 3’ instead of ‘mom’ and ‘dad?’” Putin said in September 2022. “Do we really want perversions that lead to degradation and extinction to be imposed in our schools from the primary grades?”

Anti-drag queen story time protest outshone by LGBT supporters


Sarah Dalton
Sun, 4 February 2024 

Dozens of police officers separated the two protest groups outside the Wyvern Theatre (Image: Dave Cox)

A drag queen theatre show aimed at children sparked huge protests outside the Wyvern Theatre in Swindon, as a far-right group Patriotic Alternative and LGBTQ+ supporters both took to the streets to share their opposing views.

The theatre show is aimed at parents and children and involves a storytelling drag performer reading exciting and imaginative storybooks to youngsters.

A planned protest against the show saw members of Patriotic Alternative gather outside the theatre doors to demand that the show be stopped as it was ‘inappropriate’ and ‘too sexualised’ for children.

"A drag queen by its very nature is a hyper-sexualised caricature of a woman which is not only insulting to women but isn't appropriate for children to be exposed to,” said protestor Aaron Spreadbury.


Aaron Spreadbury was protesting against the drag queen show. (Image: Newsquest)

The anti-drag queen protestors had already received heavy criticism after posting unsolicited leaflets stating 'Stop Drag Story Hour' and 'Protect Our Children' through letterboxes earlier in the week.

But the 20 or so protestors were vastly outnumbered by the mass of Swindon Pride and LGBTQ+ supporters who hosted their own counter-protest outside the theatre to ‘drown out the hate’.

Supporters of the drag queen show came out in force with loud music, bubbles, rainbow flags and chants to make it clear to Swindon that they were there loud and proud.

The two protest groups had to be separated by dozens of police officers who attended the scene.

At one point, officers yelled out to 'move back' as protestors pushed and shoved to clear a path for families getting into the theatre.

Dozens of officers were policing the event. (Image: Dave Cox)

"Swindon has shown its best front today with this turnout,” said Coral, a protestor who had come over from Oxford specifically to attend.

"I think it's an amazing representation for children to have,” added Hollie, who takes her child to Drag Queen Story Hour every year.

"If people are so bothered about people dressing up then where were they during the Christmas pantos when the theatre was full of pantomime dames?


Hollie attends the show with her child every year. (Image: Dave Cox)

"Dressing up and gender expression has been a part of the theatre since Shakespeare's times and LGBT people have always been represented in theatres.

"I went last year with my child and the books they read were about goats and dinosaur poo, it's hardly pushing an LGBT agenda is it?”

"Swindon is a very diverse community and it should stay that way. We need acceptance and understanding, not hate,” added counter protestor Rob Gray.


Police reveal 'brief intervention' after 'minor disorder' at Wyvern protest


Daniel Wood
Mon, 5 February 2024 

Dozens of police officers separated the two protest groups outside the Wyvern Theatre (Image: Dave Cox)

Wiltshire Police has issued a statement after protests and counter-protests took place at a Drag Queen Story Hour show in Swindon.

The event took place on Sunday, February 4, and saw families bring their children to the Wyvern Theatre for an afternoon of story-based entertainment led by a drag queen.

But around them, a small group of members from far-right group Patriotic Alternative protested against the event while a much larger group, organised by Swindon and Wiltshire Pride, gathered to 'drown out the hate'.

Officers from Wiltshire Police were deployed to keep the two opposing groups separate, and the force released a statement afterwards to confirm that while mostly peaceful there was one small moment they had to interject.

It said: "Wiltshire Police officers took part in a pre-planned deployment outside the Wyvern Theatre in Swindon today (February 4) in anticipation of a demonstration and counter-protest.

"The theatre was the venue for a national touring event, the Drag Queen Story Hour."

Chief Inspector Al Lumley said: “I’m pleased to say that both groups engaged with officers well and overall the event passed without any issues. The vast majority of those taking part in the demonstrations did so peacefully.

“There was a minor disorder when some people from one of the groups tried to move towards another and officers briefly intervened to prevent a breach of the peace.

“This was an isolated incident in an otherwise peaceful demonstration by both groups and I’m pleased to say that there were no reported injuries or arrests at the scene.”

This is the second time the Wyvern has hosted a Drag Queen Story Hour event and the second time a protest and counter-protest has taken place, taking over Theatre Square.

A spokesperson for Swindon and Wiltshire Pride commented: "Today, Swindon & Wiltshire Pride hosted its second Drag Queen Story Hour with Aida H Dee. These events are organised to create a fun and engaging story hour, featuring children's stories that promote acceptance and kindness.

"Unfortunately, for the second year in a row, a far-right group of anti-drag queen protestors gathered outside the Wyvern Theatre in Swindon, where the Drag Queen Story Hour was taking place.

"However, I'm proud to report that they were massively outnumbered by a group of 50+ counter-protesters who brought along music to drown out the hate. Their presence helped create a safe environment for families attending the event.

"Despite the challenges, the sold-out event went exceptionally well, and as organisers are eagerly looking forward to hosting another Drag Queen Story Hour."

They added that in 2024 it was "disheartening we still have to fight for acceptance and rights".