Friday, February 16, 2024

Ecuador: journey from “island of peace” to “narco state”

 “Neoliberalism is a dogmatic doctrine designed to prove the failed theory that the market can solve everything. A theory where people are the last thing that matters.”

Fidel Narvaez, former Ecuadorian consul in London, recently addressed the Latin America Conference 2024. You can read a published version of his speech below.

Many of you will remember well how until just six years ago, right here, conference after conference, we celebrated the progress of a small country that surprised the world with a progressive revolution. In the 10 years of the Citizen Revolution, from 2007 to 2017, Ecuador was an example of how to reduce poverty and how to reduce social inequality. The country was a respected regional and international voice in the fight for a multipolar world and was marked as a nation that privileged human beings over capital. It was the first country whose constitution granted human rights to nature and was the first to declare universal citizenship and the right to migrate within its constitution.

Alongside this, the country was an example of refugee protection with the case of Julián Assange being the most emblematic of this policy. It was fair to say that my country made the world news for what it did well rather than its mistakes.

However, Ecuador today is not even a shadow of that country. Ecuador is in the news today for what it does wrong; from having one of the worst approaches to tackling the Covid pandemic, which saw images of corpses lying in the streets appearing in the media around the world. To the nation becoming a hell of violence marked by prison riots and massacres, shootings and gang executions, even murders of presidential candidates. It is this reality that sees a new wave of emigration once again escaping in search of security and better opportunities for social progress in fellow Latin American nations.

Of all our crippling problems, insecurity in the face of crime has become the biggest. I am going to focus mostly on the analysis of this issue, because it summarizes well the destruction of the country in its entirety. In 2017, the last year of Rafael Correa’s government, Ecuador had become the second safest country in Latin America, with an average homicide rate of 5.8 per 100,000 inhabitants.

Last year, just 6 years later, the country reached 45 homicides per 100,000 inhabitants. This is a shocking increase of almost 8 times more, which has seen us become the most dangerous country in Latin America and one of the most dangerous in the world. Under Correa, Ecuador was just a minor player in the international drug market. Today it is the main point of origin of drugs entering Europe.

What happened? Why, did Ecuador so suddenly turn from “island of peace’ to “narco-state”?

Certainly, such a brutal phenomenon is the combination of external and internal factors. Many analysts, mistakenly, give greater weight to external factors: there is a certain reconfiguration in international markets and Mexican cartels have expanded towards the South; yes, that’s true. Ecuador is a dollarized country and that facilitates money laundering, yes, but the dollar has been the country’s currency since the beginning of this century. Ecuadorian ports have a convenient geostrategic position for drug transportation, yes, but those ports have been there since Ecuador has existed.

The main reason for the destruction of Ecuador is neoliberalism. The radical change between a strong state economy which saw strong social investment in education, in health, in housing, in culture and focused on aiding the most vulnerable of the population. Towards a neoliberal economy marked by the reduction of the state, of cuts to social investment and, its tight focus in favouring the richest classes.

Throughout Correa’s presidency the strong state equipped the police very well, paid them decent salaries, reformed the prison system, created a Coordinating Ministry of Security, a Ministry of Justice and Human Rights, and a school for prison guides. Even the US Drug Enforcement Agency celebrated ‘the excellent results obtained by the anti-narcotics police’ under the Citizens Revolution.

The reduced state, on the other hand, has dismantled practically everything. Under the supervision of the IMF, budgets were cut, and thousands of people were laid off. Poverty and social inequality have grown substantially.

Neoliberalism is a dogmatic doctrine designed to prove the failed theory that the market can solve everything. A theory where people are the last thing that matters. Lenin Moreno (yes, his name really is Lenin), in the middle of the pandemic, when investment in health was most needed, reduced the health budget and laid off thousands of doctors and prioritized payments of foreign debt to international financial institutions.

As a result of this pandemic, thousands of children and young people never returned to school. Many of them today are members of narco-criminal groups. The penitentiary system saw its budget cut by 30% and several ministries related to security were closed. The level of penetration of organized crime in the public force, especially in the police, but also in the justice system is such that Ecuador borders on becoming a failed state.

The new president, the son of the richest man in the country, certainly faces a difficult situation. A couple of weeks ago he declared a state of internal war and declared 22 criminal groups “terrorists.” Faced with the ineptitude and inaction of the two previous presidents, Lenin Moreno and Guillermo Lasso, any action that shows a willingness to do something is well received by the population.

In my opinion, we are facing the shock doctrine. Neoliberalism takes advantage of an extreme situation, when the population is afraid and hopeless, to implement its most extreme version. Typically, this happens after a natural disaster or war, or an economic blockade. In the case of Ecuador, however, the only cause of destruction is the neoliberal weakening of the state.

The context of “internal war” leads to abuses in the use of force by the army and the police, behind a dangerous narrative that the human rights of “criminals” are less important than those of “good people.”  A narrative of heavy hand and repression that criminalizes poverty, tolerates torture, and encourages more violence.

The context of this internal war also marks a greater rapprochement with the United States. Bilateral security ties had already been strengthened over the past five years, particularly under Lasso. But in October 2023, a cooperation agreement opened the door to a US military presence in Ecuador, which renounces some of the basic principles of its sovereignty and grants full immunity to US personnel.

In short, the Americans who left progressive Ecuador under Rafael Correa, now return and will be able to use our land, maritime, aerospace, radioelectric space as they wish, and with diplomatic immunity they will not pay any taxes and will even be able to commit any crime, because the Ecuadorian justice system won’t even be able to point a finger at them.

Ecuador is the best example of how neoliberalism can destroy a country and as such is a vital lesson both for any involved in solidarity work with Latin America and those fighting for a future dedicated to improving the lives of the many.


  • Fidel Narvaez is the former Ecuadorian consul in London.
  • The Latin America Conference 2024 was held on January 28th, 2024. You can find out more about the conference on Twitter/X here.

UK

Let’s challenge division, hate and the “war on woke” by celebrating LGBTQ+ month – Kate Osborne MP

 


FEATURED

“I was absolutely sick to the stomach to be in the chamber when Esther, mother of Brianna Ghey was in the chamber and the Prime Minister made a transphobic comment – that he has refused to apologise for.”

By Kate Osborne MP

February is LGBTQ+ History Month, a time to celebrate and remember the contributions LGBT people have made in society, this year the theme is Medicine #underthescope and whilst there has been some progress, the inequalities in health care for LGBTQ+ people remain stark, from still having to pay for unnecessary tests and self-fund for fertility treatment, to the inability to obtain mental health support and much more.

Whilst there should be many things to celebrate, I was disgusted but not surprised to see the Government chose a different route to take, their war on woke and attacks on our trans community continue at pace and in LGBTQ+ History month they revealed that the UK Government secretly shut down the NHS Pride Programme, after the Rainbow Badge scheme had been adopted by hundreds of hospitals and hundreds of thousands of healthcare workers. 

LGBTQ+ people already face barriers to accessing healthcare, and healthcare inequalities are increasing as a result. Small acts of solidarity in everyday spaces – such as the rainbow scheme – can go a long way to help tackle those inequalities and help make people feel safer and included. 

A society where individuals feel as though they are unable to access basic necessities such as healthcare and medicine is not a society we should be living in, and certainly not the path to continue down on.

Everyday wins have a huge impact, and I was proud to hold a Westminster Hall debate on IVF provision during which the minister committed to bringing forward two statutory instruments, one to end the postcode lottery for same-sex couples wanting IVF treatment and the other changing laws to allow same sex-couples with HIV to donate gametes.

But where are those changes? They have been promised for years committed to again in parliament yet no legislation has materialised.

Promises to ban so-called conversion therapy has still not happened and instead, the Minister for Women and Equalities attacks our trans community on a daily basis.

The Prime Minister joining in when he can, I was absolutely sick to the stomach to be in the chamber when Esther, mother of Brianna Ghey was in the chamber and the Prime Minister made a transphobic comment – that he has refused to apologise for. 

Transphobic comments of course would not be acceptable at any time, but to do it in front of Esther like that is beyond cruel after how much she has gone through.

Yet there is some hope, Esther herself is leading campaigns to change attitudes, and many of us continue to fight to ensure that our society is as safe and welcoming as can be.

Only two months into 2024 and we have already made waves. I was proud to host the first all-trans panel in parliament, where experts were given the platform to discuss the challenges faced by teachers, schools and parents in maintaining a safe space for trans and gender-diverse children in education. This panel made history and was one of many collaborations I will have with the Trans Solidarity Alliance.

This first event discussed the draft ‘Guidance for Schools and Colleges: Gender Questioning Children’ currently under consultation, it is incredibly vital that MPs continue to hear first hand the impact that Government policies are having on our trans community.

The draft legislation threatens to create further divisions, with its reference to trans people as an “ideology” and the recommendation that staff and teachers can “decline” a request by a trans student to use the pronouns that they identify with. 

Schools should be provided with discussions on creating more inclusive spaces for young LGBTQ+ students, not advised on how to exclude them. 

It seems alarmingly clear that a worrying amount of this legislation is built upon a lack of communication with LGBTQ+ charities and organisations, meaning that far too many MPs can continue their complete lack of understanding surrounding the impact of this legislation, let alone how to help – not harm – their trans constituents.

The future work that Trans+ Solidarity Alliance will do to brief politicians and bring the trans community into parliament to ensure their voice is heard will be pivotal, and our next panel apt for LGBTQ+ History month will be on healthcare/

We must all stand up against hate, call out homophobia, lesbophobia, biphobia, transphobia and fight to provide the spaces for these vital discussions to be had and fight against this vile Government’s anti-trans rhetoric whenever and wherever possible.

I hope that this will work to lay the groundwork that makes healthcare and medicine more accessible for LGBTQ+ people.

However, it seems as though the more I work to advocate for the LGBTQ+ community, the more I myself am subject to the consequences of this Government’s “war on woke”. In January, I received a barrage of homophobic abuse on social media, following an appearance on BBC’s Newsnight regarding the ongoing Post Office scandal.

Although homophobic abuse won’t stop me from representing my constituents – and is certainly nothing new to me – I am concerned to see it carried into 2024. I worry for the younger generation of LGBTQ+ people, who I’d hoped by now would be growing up free from this abuse, but I now see that this goal is unattainable when the language stems from the very institution set up to protect, represent and legislate for them.

We are seeing this Government stoking hatred in our communities, taking backward steps when it comes to LGBTQ+ rights – demonising a vulnerable community, all to distract from their own failures. 

Every minute that we allow this Government to get away with their vile transphobia, homophobia, and blatant ignorance, is another that an LGBTQ+ person has felt vilified and abandoned. Enough is enough – this year will be pivotal for making long-lasting and meaningful change for the LGBTQ+ community and I am proud to play a small part in that.




Labour Outlook
Amplifying socialist voices, supporting frontline struggles, building international solidarity.
If you support Labour Outlook’s work amplifying the voices of left movements and struggles in the UK and internationally, please consider becoming a supporter on Patreon.
UK
Jobcentres told to stop referring benefit claimants to food banks

DWP briefing says jobcentres should no longer issue ‘signposting slips’ over concerns about data privacy



Patrick Butler 
Social policy editor
THE GUARDIAN
Fri 16 Feb 2024 

Jobcentre officials have been ordered to stop referring penniless benefit claimants to food banks because it breaches data privacy law, in a move charities have warned will cause delays in crisis help for thousands of hungry households.

For years the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has allowed jobcentres to issue DWP-designed “signposting slips”, which allow claimants to access local food banks, many of which will not give out food parcels without a formal referral.


However, an internal DWP briefing seen by the Guardian says it will no longer issue the slips – which require the name of the claimant and brief details, such as the number of children in the household – because they amount to “inappropriate use of personal claimant data”.

Instead, new DWP signposting slips, which come into force next week, will contain just the name, address and opening time of the food bank, and none of the basic information about the claimant required by food banks to validate food parcel requests.

Food banks questioned whether the referral slips breached data laws and said the DWP’s new slips would make it harder for benefit claimants to get a food parcel.


“It’s immoral, and unethical, especially at this time when we should be making it as easy as possible for struggling people to get emergency help,” one food bank manager said.

The Trussell Trust said it had “solid” general data protection regulation (GDPR) policies in place. “When someone is referred to a food bank by a formal referral agency, all the information collected by the referral agency as part of the food bank referral process is in line with GDPR policies. Formal referral partners have data protection agreements in place with the food banks, which allows them to share the information safely,” a spokesperson said.

The move comes as the UK tips into recession, with millions of low-income households struggling with high energy and food prices, and levels of destitution rocketing, triggering soaring food bank demand. Last year, a record 3m food parcels were handed out by the Trussell Trust, the UK’s largest food bank network.


Government welfare policies administered by the DWP – including inadequate benefit levels, sanctions, and universal credit deductions and delays – are the biggest structural drivers of people using food banks.

The move is thought to make the DWP the only major public agency not to formally refer to food banks as a matter of policy. Schools, GPs, children’s centres, social services, housing associations and charities such as Citizens Advice all refer clients in emergency need.

Although some food banks do not ask for referrals, many require referral slips or vouchers as part of a screening process that shows the claimant has a genuine need for food aid. The basic client data helps them offer practical support, prevent abuse, and manage food aid demand.

In future, benefit claimants needing a food parcel must seek a referral from another accredited agency. Food banks fear claimants may not be able to access help from other agencies, or will arrive at a food bank with a new-style DWP signposting slip only to be potentially refused help.skip past newsletter promotion


Sign up to Headlines UK
Free newsletter

Get the day’s headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
Enter your email addressSign up

Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

after newsletter promotion

Gerrie Messer, the organiser at the Kingsbridge food bank in Devon, said claimants who had been able to get a referral by discreetly leaving a message on their universal credit online journal would now have to approach a school or social landlord. “Making people in crisis jump over extra hurdles [to get a food parcel] is inhumane,” she said.

The DWP said it was not its job to screen claimants for food bank slips. A spokesperson said: “Our jobcentres provide customers with guidance to find additional support when appropriate. Our signposting slips continue to provide vulnerable claimants with information on local services available to them. It is up to the discretion of food banks to whom they offer support.”

The PCS union general secretary, Fran Heathcote, representing jobcentre staff, said: “We’re disappointed that yet again our members are being asked to put themselves at a distance from some of the most vulnerable people in our communities.”

Sabine Goodwin, the director of the Independent Food Aid Network, said the new DWP guidance could “only add further chaos and confusion” and would put extra pressure on claimants and food banks.
Rare Jungle Book painting to go on show at Kipling’s home

The Return of the Buffalo Herd, by teenage prodigies Edward and Charles Detmold, can be seen at Bateman’s after conservation

The Return of the Buffalo Herd (1901), created by Edward Julius Detmold for The Jungle Book, which is now on display at Bateman's, Rudyard Kipling’s country home. Photograph: James Dobson/National Trust Images

Harriet Sherwood
THE GUARDIAN
Fri 16 Feb 2024 

A rare watercolour depicting the aftermath of a climactic moment in Rudyard Kipling’s The Jungle Book is to go on display at the author’s country home after conservation work.

The painting, The Return of the Buffalo Herd, is one of 16 created by twin brothers Edward and Charles Detmold, who were just 18 when they were commissioned to illustrate Kipling’s much-loved story. Only four of the paintings have survived.


It shows Rama, the great herd bull, staring back at the plain after Mowgli, the story’s protagonist, used a herd of buffalo to trigger a stampede to crush his foe, the murderous tiger Shere Khan.

The dramatic moment was described by Kipling: “The torrent of black horns, foaming muzzles, and staring eyes whirled down the ravine like boulders in flood time … The terrible charge of the buffalo-herd, against which no tiger can hope to stand.” Rama was a creature with “long, backward-sweeping horns and savage eyes”, he wrote.

A drawing of Edward Julius Detmold by his brother Charles Maurice Detmold. Photograph: National Portrait Gallery London

The watercolour is dated 1901 and signed with the monogram “EJD” – Edward Julius Detmold. He and his brother Charles had been creating artworks since their early teens. But, despite professional success, the twins’ personal lives were challenging, and both took their own lives – Charles in 1908 and Edward in 1957.

“Comparisons could be drawn between the Detmold twins and Mowgli, who in the original story of The Jungle Book was a rather troubled character trapped between two worlds,” said Hannah Miles, collections and house manager at Bateman’s, Kipling’s house in Burwash, Sussex, now owned by the National Trust.

“It feels poignant to display their magnificent illustration alongside a copy of the book featuring all of the twins’ original pictures, in the place that meant so much to the story’s author, Rudyard Kipling.”

View image in fullscreenView of Rudyard Kipling's country house, Bateman's, in Sussex. 
Photograph: Laurence Perry/National Trust Images


Two of the four watercolours known to survive are in private collections, and the third is held at the Natural History Museum, said Miles.

“We’re delighted to be able to put The Return of the Buffalo Herd on display at Bateman’s, exactly 130 years after the story was published. It will provide a rare chance for fans to discover and experience the story’s darker origins as it was in Kipling’s day.”

The watercolour has undergone careful conservation by Louise Drover, a specialist conservator, who humidified the work, to peel away the old canvas lining.

“Japanese tissue was used to make small repairs and the tone was evened out through gentle swabbing and minor retouching with pure pigment watercolours and chalks,” she said. “I hope visitors to Bateman’s are as enchanted by the artwork as I was.”

The National Trust said its acquisition of The Return of the Buffalo Herd was made possible thanks to a fund set up by the late philanthropist Simon Sainsbury.

In the UK and Ireland, Samaritans can be contacted on 116 123, or email jo@samaritans.org or jo@samaritans.ie. In the US, the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline is 1-800-273-8255. In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. Other international helplines can be found at befrienders.org.
Fake fur and Dr Martens: the young peer bringing change to the Lords

Carmen Smith of Plaid Cymru, 27, argues for Welsh representation and wants to ‘bring more voices’ to the unelected chamber


House of Lords
Steven Morris
THE GUARDIAN
Fri 16 Feb 2024 


She wears Dr Martens boots, loves Dua Lipa and clears her head by lifting weights. It is safe to say that Carmen Smith, who is to become a Plaid Cymru peer at the age of 27, will not be a typical member of the House of Lords.

But Smith hopes that by taking up a seat, in an institution she disapproves of, she will help change the feel and look of the place.

“I don’t believe in the House of Lords,” she said. “It’s an unelected chamber and it’s not a diverse space. But I believe that we should have Welsh voices anywhere where legislation is made that affects people in Wales.


“Until the Lords doesn’t exist we should be represented there. And hopefully the work I can do will bring more voices into that space. Perhaps make that space look different as well.”

Speaking at the Chapter arts centre in Cardiff, fresh from a gym session in which she had achieved a leg-press personal best, Smith said she had been stung by some of the critics who have claimed she was too young for the job – and only got it because she was a woman.



“I take fair criticism. You should always have scrutiny,” she says. “But in terms of my age and my gender, it has been difficult to receive a lot of negativity over the last few days. I wouldn’t be human if I didn’t feel that, but I’m hoping by doing this the next young woman or next person from a different background doesn’t have as much of this. It’s about breaking that wall. Sadly I was expecting it, but it has hit me harder than I thought it would.”
I’m pretty sure nobody in the Lords currently wears Docs,’ says Smith. 
Photograph: Dimitris Legakis/The Guardian

Smith, a former chief of staff for Plaid’s Senedd group, came second behind a man in the vote for the party’s Lords nomination, but the process included a mechanism to ensure a woman was the first nominee.

She said: “Plaid is a party of equality. I think it’s a good thing. Especially in this election it’s important, because the chamber is 70% men. You do need to take some action to change that.”

The party was hit last year by a damning report that exposed misogyny, bullying and harassment. “We’re not going to be able to make change unless we’re more proactive about it,” she said.

Smith said young people were capable of “incredible things”, citing Plaid contemporaries who had campaigned brilliantly on issues such as free school meals and period poverty. “I don’t think that campaign would have come from a 71-year-old in the House of Lords,” she said.

Smith is the youngest of seven siblings and grew up in Ynys Môn (Anglesey) in north Wales. Her father worked for British Steel and she shared the caring duties for him when he was diagnosed with dementia. She has had a paid job since she was 14 and has served as the deputy president of the National Union of Students (NUS) in Wales. At the moment she works in comms for a green energy company, but will give up that job to serve in the Lords.

She is certain Wales will become independent in her lifetime – and would not include a body like the Lords. “My generation is more in favour [of independence] than the generations before me. There will be a majority of people in the future who will support independence.”

Smith is heading to London on Friday to learn about the logistics of the new job. She wants to wear fake fur rather than ermine, and hopes she’ll be able to wear her Dr Martens. “I’m sure I’ll be given a handbook on the dress code. I’m pretty sure nobody in the Lords currently wears Docs.”

She hopes to stay in Cardiff and commute by train. Her title hasn’t been nailed down, but she may become Baroness (Lady) Smith of Llanfaes. “That’s where I grew up. It’s an area that’s quite underprivileged and it would be good to shine a light on it.”

Smith intends to make her Lords oath in Welsh as well as English. “That’s something I’d like to do in terms of championing the Welsh language and culture.”

She says she has no intention of staying in the Lords for years. “I’ll be happy to hand the baton on to someone else. I don’t know what the future looks like but I just want to feel like I’m making an impact.”
Death toll rises to seven in Malawi elephant relocation project linked to Prince Harry

The animal translocation scheme by wildlife NGOs including African Parks, once headed by the royal, has been dogged by controversy



The age of extinction

THE GUARDIAN
Fri 16 Feb 2024 


Four more people have died after an elephant translocation overseen by two wildlife organisations, including one that was headed by Prince Harry, in a protected area in Malawi. The recent deaths bring the total fatalities connected to the relocated elephants to seven.

In July 2022, more than 250 elephants were moved from Liwonde national park in southern Malawi to the country’s second-largest protected area, Kasungu, in a three-way operation between Malawi’s national park service and two NGOs: the International Fund for Animal Welfare (Ifaw), and African Parks. Prince Harry was president of African Parks for six years, before being elevated to the board of directors from 2023.


The movement of elephants was among the largest of its kind ever attempted, the conservation groups said at the time. The groups used images of the 263 elephants being transported for fundraising, and videos of the huge animals being lifted by crane were described as “scenes reminiscent of the Disney classic Dumbo”.

In the days after the translocation, however, two people were killed by elephants in the area the animals were moved to, and a third person was killed in September that year. Communities warned of growing problems with human-wildlife conflict with the African mammals, which frequently raid crops.

After the move, a community leader accused the wildlife NGOs of caring more about animals than people. An electric fence to protect people on the edge of the park had not been completed, he said, highlighting that the elephants had been moved from a protected area that already had a fence. Ifaw and the Malawian national park service contest that this was a condition of the translocation. African Parks disputed that the movement of the elephants had been rushed.

Now, a further four people have been killed by elephants in Kasungu, bringing the total fatalities to seven, with areas of the fence still incomplete. The deaths have left several children orphaned and some families struggling to get by, the Guardian understands. Ifaw continued to raise funds using news of the translocation in 2023. The NGO said its Room to Roam initiative to protect elephants offered a solution to biodiversity loss and the climate crisis.

On the Malawian side of the park in June 2023, 31-year-old Masiye Phiri was killed and her two-year-old child was injured when they were charged by a bull elephant in a garden after a group had left the park boundaries. In August 2023, Jackson Banda was killed by an elephant, again after several elephants got out of the park. The next month, Boniface Nkhoma was attacked by elephants at night while walking on a road when the mammals had again gone beyond the park boundaries.


On the Zambian side, Andrew Phiri, 65, was killed by a bull elephant in September 2023. The Guardian was told by local sources of a fifth death but could not confirm details. Ifaw said it was aware of seven deaths since the elephants were translocated.

Malidadi Langa, chair of an association of villages near Kasungu national park on the Malawian side, who welcomed the elephant translocation as a boost to tourism, called for the creation of an insurance scheme to compensate affected families. He said elephant-human conflict was affecting some of the poorest and most marginalised families.

“Although, with hindsight, we wish things could have been done better to prevent and mitigate the negative impact of the translocation in elephant-human conflict, we now want to focus more on finding solutions,” Langa said.

“Although good progress is being made on construction of the electric fence around Kasungu national park, such fencing needs to be embedded in policy and legal frameworks as a requirement, given that Malawi’s protected areas are bounded by dense human settlements.

“We want the introduction of some form of a human-wildlife conflict insurance scheme to offset losses suffered by victims. This is against the background of our experience with the translocation to date and the reality that human-wildlife conflict is exacerbating inequality since it affects already poor and marginalised communities living in hard-to-reach areas on the edge of the park,” he said.


Prince Harry wildlife NGO under fire after elephants kill three in Malawi


In a statement, Ifaw said it was deeply saddened by each death or injury caused by elephants that have strayed from Kasungu. It said it works closely with the Malawian and Zambian governments to coordinate on human-wildlife conflict, and had been providing community support. It said 57 miles of fencing near the park and been completed and an additional 25 miles would be finished in 2024.

“Ifaw operates within the policy and legal framework of the governments of Malawi and Zambia. It is the government’s responsibility to deal with compensation in such matters, although there exists no such legal provision within the law of the two governments. Ifaw is bound to follow protocol in the management of these areas. However, Ifaw works with the governments to support the families tragically affected by human-elephant conflict by providing logistical and financial support – such as food, transport and coffins for the funerals of the deceased,” it said.

Malawi’s national park service said there had been a substantial reduction in human-wildlife conflict in areas where the fence had been built. It said more staff had been hired to safeguard the community from raiding elephants, and disputed that the initial translocation was not done safely or without respect for local communities.

African Parks, whose involvement with the translocation ended last year, did not publicly comment. It had previously published a lengthy response to media coverage in 2022. The prince was not involved in this translocation with African Parks.

Zambia’s national park service did not respond.

Find more age of extinction coverage here, and follow biodiversity reporters Phoebe Weston and Patrick Greenfield on X for all the latest news and features
💓HeartUnions week: Mick Lynch perfectly sums up the power of a union


14 February, 2024 
Left Foot Forward
News Trade Unions

"If you sing on your own, you’re one voice, if you sing in a choir, it’s a powerful voice.”





Every year, a week is dedicated to sharing stories about the work of unions and celebrating the trade union movement. As it’s Valentine’s Day it seems even more fitting to share an ode to trade unions given by the prominent trade unionist Mick Lynch.

In a video posted by the RMT union, its General Secretary Mick Lynch shared an inspiring message to perfectly sum up the power of joining a union.

“People need to join a union because it’s your hope and it’s your strength,” said Lynch.

“If you’re in a union you’re not isolated. If you’re on your own, they pick you off.

“Like the idea that if you sing on your own your one voice, if you sing in a choir, it’s a powerful voice.”

MPs have also come out in support of unions and backed the campaign week by encouraging people to join a union. Angela Rayner posted a video in which she said it was a time to celebrate the “vital work they do in the service of working people.”

In the video shared online, Rayner highlighted Labour’s New Deal for Working People which would work together with trade unions to “make work pay”, as she shared the message to join a union.

Labour MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy also highlighted the ways in which the union movement can support workers.

Ribeiro-Addy wrote on X: “Every week, trade unionists are showing us the best way to fight back against the cost of living scandal: getting together, getting organised, and refusing to let employers make them poorer. If your pay isn’t keeping up with inflation, join a union and do the same.”

She highlighted the everyday benefits that we may take for granted hard-won by union action, including weekend and holiday pay along with health and safety laws.

Other areas where unions can help members is in providing legal support and advice, fighting for better parental and maternity leave, equal opportunities and against discrimination and higher wages.

TUC leader Paul Nowak has written about the different ways trade unions are winning for working people and why their work is all the more vitally important right now.

MP Ian Lavery drew attention to the struggle of Amazon workers in their ongoing strike action for £15 an hour and union recognition.

He wrote: “This HeartUnions week we should all take time to realise some of the horrendous working conditions so many people find themselves in and how unions have organised to improve workplaces.

“Join a union to protect yourself, protect your colleagues and build a better world.”



Hannah Davenport is news reporter at Left Foot Forward, focusing on trade unions and environmental issues



THE UNION FOR THE REST OF US


UK
Humiliation for Tories as Labour win Kingswood and Wellingborough by-elections

Today

The latest losses for the Tories mean that they have now suffered the highest number of by-election losses in a single Parliament since 1960.



The Tories have suffered yet more humiliation after the Labour Party secured comfortable wins in both the Kingswood and Wellingborough by-elections.

The latest losses for the Tories mean that they have now suffered the highest number of by-election losses in a single Parliament since 1960.

In Wellingborough, the Labour party overcame a majority of more than 18,500 to take the seat. The swing of 28.5% was the second biggest from the Tories to Labour in any post-war by-election, meaning that newly elected Labour MP Gen Kitchen took the seat which had been held by ousted Tory MP Peter Bone since 2005.

In Kingswood, the Labour Party overturned a majority of 11,000 with a swing of 16.4%, with Damien Egan becoming the constituency’s new MP.

Reacting to the news, Lord Gavin Barwell, a former Conservative MP who served as Theresa May’s chief of staff in No 10, described the Wellingborough result as ‘catastrophically bad’.

He posted on X: “The Kingswood result is bad but not that bad (Labour lead smaller than at the 2005 general election); the Wellingborough result is catastrophically bad.

“And both by elections confirm the Conservatives are facing a perfect storm, losing voters to both Labour and Reform.”

Labour leader Keir Starmer hailed the “fantastic” results, insisting they demonstrate people “want change and are ready to put their faith in a changed Labour Party to deliver it”.

He added: “By winning in these Tory strongholds, we can confidently say that Labour is back in the service of working people and we will work tirelessly to deliver for them.

“The Tories have failed. Rishi’s recession proves that. That’s why we’ve seen so many former Conservative voters switching directly to this changed Labour Party.

“Those who gave us their trust in Kingswood and Wellingborough, and those considering doing so, can be safe in the knowledge that we will spend every day working to get Britain’s future back.”

Basit Mahmood is editor of Left Foot Forward


Labour can celebrate byelection wins, but low turnout is cause for concern

Byelections
NEVER HAVE HIGH TURN OUT

Political correspondent
THE GUARDIAN
Fri 16 Feb 2024

Swing in both seats would easily secure a majority at national level, but disillusion among voters is clear

The records continue to fall for Labour. The result in the Wellingborough byelection, in which the party achieved a 28.5% swing from the Conservatives, was the biggest Labour victory over the Tories since 1994 and the second biggest since the war.

Along with the victory in Kingswood, the party has now made six byelection gains since 2019 – the most it has made in a single parliament. The Conservatives have lost 10 byelections in that time – the most they have ever lost in a single parliament.


Keir Starmer, the Labour leader, called the results “fantastic”, adding: “By winning in these Tory strongholds, we can confidently say that Labour is back in the service of working people and we will work tirelessly to deliver for them.”

Labour’s swing in both seats was large enough that if repeated at a general election, the party would easily secure a majority.

On a swing of 16.4%, as seen in Kingswood, South Gloucestershire, Labour would have a majority of about 60 seats. If the result in Wellingborough, Northamptonshire, was repeated nationally, it would be apocalyptic for the Conservatives. On one calculation it would give them just four seats in a general election.

John Curtice, a professor of politics at Strathclyde University, wrote on Friday morning: “These two results suggest the Conservatives still have a mountain to climb. Indeed, at the moment, they still seem to be struggling to get even so far as base camp.”

For Starmer, the results are a welcome relief after a month dominated by headlines first about his U-turn on his green investment plans and then the controversy surrounding two of its candidates in the north-west who were recorded making derogatory remarks about Israel.

Labour officials, however, will be slightly concerned that the Wellingborough result is an anomaly, given that the Tory’s candidate was Helen Harrison, the partner of the constituency’s former MP, Peter Bone, who was recalled after being found to have bullied a staff member.


One Tory activist said: “None of us wanted to campaign in Wellingborough, we just couldn’t face having to justify our choice of candidate.”

If Kingswood is more representative of national opinion, it suggests the Labour lead is softening slightly after three byelections last year where the swing was more than 20% on each occasion.

Recent polls suggest the party has dropped in the polls since Starmer’s decision to scrap his £28bn-a-year green spending plans – though none have been conducted since Thursday’s announcement that the country entered a recession at the end of last year.

The Tories tried to put a gloss on the defeats on Friday, highlighting the low turnout in both seats.

Just 37% of voters turned out in Kingswood, and 38% in Wellingborough – below the mid-40s seen in recent byelections in Mid Bedfordshire, Somerton and Frome, and Selby and Ainsty. In both seats, the increase in Labour support was just half the drop in the Conservatives’ vote, suggesting that the opposition party is not fully capitalising on the government’s unpopularity.

If the Conservatives can persuade their voters to come out at a general election, party officials have said, they can still keep hold of power. Some are also keen to point out the success of Reform UK at both byelections, securing more than 10% of the vote in each.


“We have fought robust campaigns on the ground in both of these seats with local candidates,” said a Tory official. “But these byelections were always going to be hard. The government of the day rarely win byelections.”

The former cabinet minister Jacob Rees-Mogg said: “I certainly thought this result would be worse … If we can reunite the right in politics there’s a real opportunity for us.”

Rees-Mogg has been at the forefront of efforts by Tory backbenchers to get the prime minister to tack to the right to claw back voters from Reform. Responding to Thursday’s economic data, one Conservative MP said Sunak should “cut business and personal taxes, reduce immigration, adopt radical measures to increase the size of the indigenous workforce”.

Sunak’s problem, however, is that he is losing votes on both sides and that any move to the right risks losing support, especially in the southern suburban seats being targeted by the Liberal Democrats.

Labour’s concern, however, is one identified by Starmer at the beginning of the year: that voters are not really moving their way but are instead so disillusioned with politics that they are staying at home. “The message on the doorstep was the same everywhere I went,” said one Labour activist. “Voters hate all of us.”

Labour overturns 18,000 Tory majority to win Wellingborough byelection


Gen Kitchen takes seat for party for first time since 2001 general election to temper fears after testing week


Sammy Gecsoyler
@SammyGecsoyler
Fri 16 Feb 2024 




Labour has scored its largest swing in a byelection since 1994 after overturning a majority of more than 18,000 in Wellingborough, bolstering predictions that the party is on course for a landslide victory at the next general election.

Labour’s candidate, Gen Kitchen, won with 13,844 votes, beating the Conservatives’ Helen Harrison who received 7,408 votes in the largest swing from the Tories to Labour since 1994 and second-largest since the second world war. It was Labour’s fifth byelection gain from the Conservatives overall in this parliament. The party also gained a Tory seat in Kingswood, dealing a double blow to an embattled Conservative party that has lost 10 byelections in a single parliament, more than any government since the 1960s.

Labour achieved its largest swing in a byelection since 1994 with 28.5%. Turnout stood at 38.1% in Wellingborough and 37.1% in Kingswood, fairly low figures compared with other recent byelections in England. Tamworth and Somerton and Frome recorded lower turnouts but contests in Uxbridge, Selby and Ainsty and Mid Bedfordshire saw figures in the mid-40s.

Speaking after her win, Kitchen said: “The people of Wellingborough have spoken for Britain. This is a stunning victory for the Labour party and must send a message from Northamptonshire to Downing Street.”

The wins in Wellingborough and Kingswood will temper fears that a testing week for Labour has significantly threatened its electoral prospects and will further bolster predictions that the party stands to win a large majority at the next general election.

Harrison appeared at the count about two hours before the results were announced. She was in high spirits, posing for photographs and telling reporters she was feeling “good”. She also appeared on good terms with Reform UK, at one point calling over the party’s leader, Richard Tice.

After the result was announced, Harrison was swarmed with cameras while leaving the counting hall and declined to say whether her loss was Sunak’s fault, instead saying she was “disappointed”. She said she would “absolutely” be running again before complaining she could not see because of the bright camera lights in her face. A car was waiting for Harrison outside the venue which she swiftly entered as supporters caught up to applaud her before the car drove off.

Reform UK achieved its best result in an election so far, winning 13% of the vote, beating the record set about an hour earlier in Kingswood, where the party reached 10% of the vote. Ben Habib, the party’s candidate in Wellingborough, said the result was a staging post for the party’s growth, adding “the world is our oyster”.


When asked whether standing would lead to greater Tory losses and hand Labour a stronger mandate to enact policies the party opposes, Habib said: “I’m not into being a weathervane for the Conservative party. I’m not in it to make sure we get minor policy adjustments which suit our view of life. We need a 180 degree handbrake U-turn from the policy direction that the Conservative party has taken and that Labour will frankly continue.”

The byelection in Wellingborough was triggered when voters recalled the former Tory MP Peter Bone after he received a six-week suspension from the Commons when an inquiry found he had subjected a staff member to bullying and sexual misconduct.

He won the Northamptonshire constituency at every general election from 2005 to 2019, with Labour coming second in four of the five contests and Ukip doing so in 2015. His majority in 2019 was 36%. Bone did not attend Thursday night’s count.

There was further controversy after Bone’s partner, Harrison, was selected as the Conservative candidate. High-profile Tory MPs have been absent in the constituency and not a single frontbencher endorsed Harrison. Last month, Rishi Sunak dodged the opportunity to endorse her after he was asked whether he was “proud” she had been selected given her connection to Bone. He said it was up to local members to select their candidate.

Harrison stayed firmly out of the spotlight in the run-up to the byelection. She refused all national media interviews and has not posted on the social media platform X since 11 January, when she announced her selection.

The result will be welcomed by Keir Starmer, who has had one of his most challenging weeks since becoming Labour leader after two of the party’s parliamentary candidates were suspended in the space of 24 hours over comments relating to Israel. On Wednesday, a Savanta poll had Labour’s lead over the Conservatives down by seven points, its lowest since June 2023.

On Sunday, remarks made by Azhar Ali, Labour’s candidate in the Rochdale byelection, surfaced in which he said Israel had deliberately relaxed security before the 7 October Hamas attack after warnings of an imminent threat. After initially backing Ali, Starmer withdrew support for him on Monday evening.

Less than 24 hours later, the party suspended Graham Jones, the candidate for Hyndburn, after a recording surfaced of him suggesting world leaders privately bemoaned “fucking Israel”.

Speaking before the result, Toby Perkins, the shadow nature and rural affairs minister, said the suspension of Ali and Hyndburn did not come up on the doorstep, adding the win would give the party a lift.

Last week, Starmer formally dropped his flagship target of spending £28bn a year on green investment, citing poor economic conditions, despite support for the policy from the public and warnings from business leaders to keep it.

Labour last held Wellingborough between 1997 and 2005, losing it in that year’s general election to Bone. During the Tony Blair years Wellingborough was a swing seat. Labour won it in 1997 with a majority of just 187 votes and lost it in 2005 by 687.

In recent years the constituency has been a Tory stronghold, with the Conservatives winning with a majority of 18,540 in 2019.

For the Conservatives, the loss of another safe seat could prompt long-shot attempts by backbenchers on the right of the party – who are already at odds with the prime minister over the Rwanda bill – to replace Sunak as leader before the next general election.

Wellingborough and Kingswood by-election triumphs: Four key takeaways


Congratulations to Labour’s newest MPs-in-waiting, Damien Egan and Gen Kitchen – after major victories in the night’s two by-elections. Read all you need to know about Kitchen and the Wellingborough result here, and Egan and the Kingswood result and reaction here Some notable quick takeaways…

1. The Tory-to-Labour by-election swings are very promising

 


Analysis suggests Labour needs a 12.7% swing to secure an overall majority at the general election.

In Wellingborough, the swing of over 28% is better than any Labour by-election performance yet in this parliament, and second only to the record Tory-to-Labour postwar swing seen in Dudley West in 1994 (29.1%).

In Kingswood, Labour notched up a 16.4% swing, apparently close to what Labour achieved in a Wirral South by-election in 1997.

2. More by-election records smashed

The Mirror reports that the Tories have now suffered more by-election losses in a single parliament than any government since the 1960s.

Apparently the decline of 37.1 points in the Tory vote in Welligborough is also the biggest fall in postwar history.

3. Voters really are fed up with Tory decay and soaring prices

Kitchen said her victory showed how “desperately” voters want change. “People here…know our roads aren’t fit to drive on, getting your child a doctor’s appointment can seem impossible, and that they are paying more and getting less. Today they said, enough is enough.”

Meanwhile Egan said Kingswood voters had raised their struggles getting doctors’ or dentists’ appointments, safety on the streets and worries about what food they put in the trolley or how they heat their homes this winter. The cost of living crisis is “not just a slogan”.

4. Reform walked the walk on their strong opinion polling

Reform notched up vote shares of 10.4% in Kingswood and 13% in Wellingborough.

Pollster Luke Tryl noted that while Reform’s vote share exceeds Labour’s majority in Kingswood, not all Reform votes will go back to the Conservatives (as some Tories are implying now)– “so while Reform may have exacerbated the swing they haven’t cost them the seat.”

Sir John Curtice said Reform had “put down a marker”, showing more than one party are “hunting” to tap Tory discontent – but its success “may well end up doing more to help Labour”.



Tom Belger is editor of LabourList.

View all articles by Tom Belger