Friday, September 27, 2024

‘Asian NATO’ supporter Ishiba to become Japan’s prime minister

Shigeru Ishiba said Japan needs to play a ‘great role’ in its alliance with the US.
By Taejun Kang for RFA
2024.09.27
Taipei, Taiwan

‘Asian NATO’ supporter Ishiba to become Japan’s prime ministerFormer Japanese defense minister Shigeru Ishiba waves as he is elected as new head of the ruling party in the Liberal Democratic Party’s leadership vote and is set to become Japan’s next prime minister in Tokyo, Japan, Sept. 27, 2024. Kyodo/via Reuters

Veteran Japanese lawmaker Shigeru Ishiba, who supports the creation of an “Asia version of NATO”, was set on Friday to become prime minister after winning a closely fought contest to lead the ruling Liberal Democratic Party.

Since the LDP holds a parliamentary majority, the next party leader will  replace Fumio Kishida as prime minister. Kishida  announced his intention to step down in August. 

“We must believe in the people, speak the truth with courage and sincerity, and work together to make Japan a safe and secure country where everyone can live with a smile once again,” Ishiba said in a brief speech to lawmakers after the party vote.

The LDP chose Ishiba as Japan grapples with increasing security threats and risk of war in the region, with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, North Korea’s nuclear ambitions and China’s growing military assertiveness.

The 67-year-old Ishiba, who said changes in the security environment were the reason he announced his candidacy, has been strong on deterrence.

The former defense minister expressed his desire to create an “Asian version of NATO” and bring equality to the Japan-U.S. Status of Forces Agreement.

“Ukraine is not a member of NATO. It is not hard to imagine that this prompted President [Vladimir] Putin’s decision,” he said, stressing the need to build a collective security system in Asia, at a news conference on Sept. 10, referring to the Russian leader’s decision to send troops into Ukraine.

2024-09-27T071715Z_1088888455_RC2U8AAFKIUY_RTRMADP_3_JAPAN-POLITICS.JPG
Shigeru Ishiba celebrates after he was elected as new head of Japan's ruling party at the Liberal Democratic Party’s leadership election Friday, Sept. 27, 2024, in Tokyo, Japan. (Hiro Komae/Pool via Reuters)

While Ishiba does not question the importance of the security alliance with the U.S., he has said Japan needs to play a greater role in the alliance and have a larger say in how American troops are deployed in Japan. 

For instance, he wrote in his 2024 memoir that “Japan is still not a truly independent country” because of the “asymmetry” of its dependence on America for its security.

Ishiba also announced he would consider revising the SOFA, or Status of Forces Agreement, which sets the rules for U.S. military operations in Japan. The agreement was concluded when the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty was revised in 1960 and has remained unchanged.

Ishiba said that as LDP president, and thus prime minister, he would seek to establish a base in the U.S. to train Japan’s Self-Defense Forces.

He argued that SOFA should be at the same level as an agreement that would be established upon the creation of such an SDF base in the U.S.

“If we are going to revise SOFA, it has to be something that will strengthen the alliance and improve the regional security environment,” said Ishiba. 


RELATED STORIES

US, South Korea, Japan to finalize trilateral secretariat establishment

‘Too early’ for an Asian NATO: US official

Front-runner for next Japanese leader eyes better North Korean ties


Ishiba is known as a strong backer of Taiwanese democracy while also calling for deeper engagement with China.

He wrote in his memoir that conflating the Russian invasion of Ukraine and a possible Chinese attack on Taiwan was driven by emotion, not a pragmatic assessment of Chinese threats and the impact on Japan.

The nail-biter party election consisted of two rounds. In the first round, the  368 LDP members in the legislature and 368 rank-and-file members cast  ballots. In a second runoff round between the top two candidates, 415 votes were cast.

Ishiba came second, after economic security minister Sanae Takaichi, in the first round but he beat Takaichi in the runoff by 21 votes.

“I want to protect Japan, protect the people, protect the local regions, and want to be the LDP that follows the rules,” Ishiba said after the first vote.

He will be officially announced as prime minister at a special legislative session on Oct. 1.

Edited by Mike Firn.


Shigeru Ishiba is chosen as Japan's next prime minister after winning leadership vote of ruling LDP party

By North Asia correspondent James Oaten in Tokyo

Former Japanese defence minister Shigeru Ishiba accepts the top job following the party vote. (Kyodo via Reuters)

Japan's next prime minister will be maverick regional politician Shigeru Ishiba after the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) elected him the new leader following the news Prime Minister Fumio Kishida would step down.

Mr Ishiba, a veteran politician and former defence minister, won the top job after a runoff against Sanae Takaichi in an internal ballot after none of the original nine hopefuls won enough support to win the ballot outright.

Had Ms Takaichi won, she would have become Japan's first female prime minister.

The vote was sparked after Mr Kishida announced he would no longer seek the top job at the scheduled party meeting, following months of low approval ratings and a donations scandal that embroiled high-ranking politicians.



Shigeru Ishiba won the leadership vote in a runoff election for the Liberal Democratic Party. (Hiro Komae via Reuters)

Before the final vote among LDP politicians, Mr Ishiba vowed to clean up the party's image.

"We will put an end to the widespread distrust in the LDP," he said.


"Once the election is over, we will put our hearts into protecting Japan, local areas, rules and the people of Japan."

Mr Ishiba, 67, has tried and failed to secure the top job many times.

He is known as a maverick, speaking against the party when he feels necessary, which has made him popular among voters.

"He appears on television media quite a lot to give very frank and honest opinions, including criticism of his own government, and that has made him popular with voters," said Jeff Hall, an expert in politics at Kanda University.



Shigeru Ishiba acknowledged his win after he was elected as new head of Japan's ruling LDP party. (Hiro Komae via Reuters)

He hails from a regional part of Japan suffering population decline and has spoken about the need to help all of Japan, and not just the big cities.

"He has this sort of idealistic focus on helping every part of Japan, and he is also very much a policy expert-kind of politician.

"He loves to talk about defence policy, natural disaster relief policies."

But his criticism of the party, including leaving the LDP before, has hurt him in the past, with some fellow LDP members calling him a traitor.
Ishiba beat out would-be first female PM

Mr Ishiba beat out Ms Takaichi, 63, the economic security minister and a hardline conservative who has praised Margaret Thatcher as a role model.

A protege of former prime minister, the late Shinzo Abe, Ms Takaichi talked about stimulating the economy and maintaining ultra-low interest rates.

But there was concern her conservative views were out of line with the electorate.


"She's extremely conservative on social views, far to the right of most Japanese voters, on things like gender, on same-sex marriage, on the issue of whether or not women should be allowed to have a separate family name when they get married," Mr Hall said.



Sanae Takaichi would have been Japan's first female prime minister. (Hiro Komae via Reuters)

She also advocated visiting the Yasukuni Shrine, which honours Japan's war dead, including convicted war criminals.

Her position would infuriate China and South Korea, a country Japan has tried to build relations with.

"She is also very, very hawkish towards China," Mr Hall said.

One of the initial frontrunners in the race was Shinjiro Koizumi, son of former prime minister Junichiro Koizumi.

At 42, Mr Koizumi would have become Japan's youngest prime minister were he successful, but a series of gaffs led many to conclude he was too inexperienced.


"He thinks he can be the Japanese Trudeau, and he's young, he's handsome," Mr Hall said.

"There are a lot of jokes and memes that depict him as an air-headed person who doesn't really have much substance to him."


Japanese former environment minister Shinjiro Koizumi, the 43-year-old son of former Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, speaks at a press conference ahead of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) leadership election in Tokyo, Japan, September 6, 2024. REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon (Reuters: Kim Kyung-Hoon)
How the votes were counted

The LDP leadership is elected from a 50-50 split between party members, of which there are just under 1.1 million, and its 368 members of parliament, the Diet.

If no candidate wins enough support from the initial vote, a runoff is held that is only open to the members of parliament.

This means a politician less popular with the public can be elected, as factional heads will get the ultimate say.

"Kishida was a classic example of a leader selected not because of his appeal to voters, but because factions within his party wanted to block another politician from becoming PM," said Mr Hall.


Officials show the result of the first voting to election commission at the leadership election. (Hiro Komae via Reuters)

In this runoff, Ms Takaichi was more popular in the initial vote, achieving 72 votes from Diet members while Mr Ishiba won 46.

But among party members, the vote was much closer, with Ms Takaichi beating her rival by one vote.
Snap election expected

Japan's political system is renowned for its relatively high rotation of prime ministers, yet one where the electorate continues to re-elect the same political party.

The LDP has ruled Japan almost uninterrupted in its post-war years.

It lost majority for only a few months in 1993 and was out of government between 2009 and 2013, losing to the centre-left Democratic Party of Japan.

But those years were marred by internal fighting and the the centre-left party failed to deliver on key policies, prompting voters to return the LDP, viewing them as the more experienced party to run the country.

In recent years, the government has been riddled with scandal. The most explosive were revelations senior members of government failed for years to declare donations.

While Mr Kishida wasn't directly involved in the donations scandal, voters saw him as unable to fix the problem, and his voter approval ratings tanked.


Japan's Prime Minister Fumio Kishida (centre) announced he would no longer seek the top job after months of low approval ratings and a donations scandal. (Hiro Komae via Reuters)

Despite this, the LDP is still expected to win the next general election.

"The LDP, at least, has the experienced people and the know-how to run a government without messing things up, at least in an opinion of many people," Mr Hall said.

"The various scandals of the LDP are, of course, abhorrent, and people are very annoyed by them, but a lot of them are petty corruption scandals and various other scandals that don't cause the country to grind to a halt, or they don't involve breaking major promises to voters."

The main opposition party, the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, has appointed former prime minister Yoshihiko Noda as its leader, to try and unite the opposition forces and appear as a reliable pair of hands.

Mr Ishiba is expected to call a snap election, meaning Japan will be returning to the polls in late October or November.



Shigeru Ishiba: the outsider set to become Japan's next Prime Minister

During the LDP leadership campaign, he called for Japan to lead the creation of an 'Asian NATO', an idea quickly rejected by Washington as too hasty

Reuters Tokyo Published 27.09.24, 

Japan's next prime minister Shigeru Ishiba says he reads three books a day and would rather do that than mingle with the ruling party colleagues who picked him as their new leader on Friday.


16Shigeru Ishiba acknowledges after he was elected as new head of Japan's ruling LDP party at the Liberal Democratic Party's (LDP) leadership election Friday, Sept. 27, 2024, in Tokyo. (Reuters)

The 67-year-old's successful leadership bid after four failed attempts puts the self-confessed lone wolf at the helm of a Liberal Democratic Party that has ruled Japan for most of the past seven decades.

Ishiba takes over with the party in crisis, having seen its public support ebb away over the past two years with revelations of links to a church branded a cult by critics and a scandal over unrecorded donations.

26Shigeru Ishiba speaks before a runoff election at the Liberal Democratic Party's (LDP) leadership election Friday, Sept. 27, 2024, in Tokyo. (Reuters)


A former defence minister who entered parliament in 1986 after a short banking career, Ishiba was sidelined by outgoing prime minister, Fumio Kishida, becoming instead a dissenting voice in the party.


He has rebelled on policies including the increased use of nuclear energy and has criticised his party for not allowing married couples to use separate surnames.


"I consider this my final battle," Ishiba said last month when he launched his campaign at a Shinto shrine in rural Tottori prefecture, where his father was governor and where Ishiba began his political career at the height of Japan's fast growing bubble economy.


"I will bring back a vibrant Japan where people can live with a smile."

36Shigeru Ishiba speaks before a runoff election at the Liberal Democratic Party's (LDP) leadership election Friday, Sept. 27, 2024, in Tokyo. (Reuters)


Ishiba, who has also served as agriculture minister, promised to move some ministries and government agencies out of Tokyo to help revive Japan's moribund regions. He has also proposed establishing an agency to oversee the construction of emergency shelters across disaster-prone Japan.


Friction


But his outspoken views, including calls for Fumio and other prime ministers to step down, have earned him enemies in the LDP.


That enmity, which also stems from a four-year defection to an opposition group in 1993, made it difficult for Ishiba to win the 20 nominations he needed from fellow lawmakers to qualify as a candidate in the election on Friday.

46One of candidates Shigeru Ishiba casts his ballot at the Liberal Democratic Party's (LDP) leadership election Friday, Sept. 27, 2024, in Tokyo. (Reuters)


After a first round of voting put him through to a run-off with economic security minster Sanae Takaichi, Ishiba acknowledged that his refusal to compromise has caused issues with his colleagues.


"I have undoubtedly hurt many people's feelings, caused unpleasant experiences, and made many suffer. I sincerely apologize for all of my shortcomings," he said in an address to LDP lawmakers who gathered at party headquarters for the election.


His lack of popularity among lawmakers means that Ishiba has had to rely on the support he has nurtured among rank-and-file members over his four decades in politics.


He has stayed in the public eye during his time away from government with media appearances, social media posts and on YouTube, where he muses on topics ranging from Japan's falling birthrate to ramen noodles.


He also pokes fun at himself, including his sometimes-awkward manner and hobbies including plastic models of ships and military aircraft, some of which he displays on the bookshelves that line his parliamentary office in Tokyo.

56Former defence minister Shigeru Ishiba, a candidate for Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party’s (LDP) presidential election, speaks during a debate at the Nixon Kisha Club in Tokyo, Japan. September 14, 2024. (Reuters)


U.S. Diplomacy


Seen as an LDP intellectual heavyweight and expert on national security policy, he advocates for a more assertive Japan that can reduce its reliance on longtime ally, the U.S., for its defence.


That position, analysts say, could complicate relations with Washington.


During the LDP leadership campaign, he called for Japan to lead the creation of an "Asian NATO", an idea quickly rejected by Washington as too hasty.


In Okinawa where most of the U.S. troops in Japan are concentrated, he said he would seek greater oversight of the bases they use. He also wants Washington to give Japan a say in how it would use nuclear weapons in Asia.


In an interview with Reuters, Ishiba also criticized the U.S. political backlash to Nippon Steel's bid for U.S. Steel, saying it unfairly cast Japan as a national security risk. Kishida has avoided making comments on the issue ahead of the U.S. presidential election.

66Former Defense Minister Shigeru Ishiba, a candidate of Japan's ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) presidential election, speaks during a joint press conference at the LDP headquarters in Tokyo, Japan, September 13, 2024. (Reuters)


Policy shifts


Ishiba has, however, softened some policy positions that have put him at odds with party colleagues, most notably saying he would keep some reactors operating in Japan, despite his past opposition to nuclear power and support for renewable energy sources.


A fiscal conservative who has promised to respect the independence of the Bank of Japan to set monetary policy, he has more recently said it is unclear whether conditions were right for a fresh hike in interest rates.


"Politicians don't need to be best friends, as long as their policies and political positions match," Ishiba said in a video posted on YouTube this week

What Japan’s Next Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba Means for the World

Former Japanese Defense Minister Shigeru Ishiba delivers a speech before a runoff in the ruling Liberal Democratic Party’s presidential election to choose the successor to outgoing Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, at the party’s headquarters in Tokyo, Sept. 27, 2024.Kyodo/AP


TIME
September 27, 2024 


Ishiba Shigeru is set to become Japan’s new Prime Minister after winning the presidency of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) in a ballot of party lawmakers and members on Friday afternoon.

A plain-spoken populist and former defense minister who gained the LDP’s leadership on his fifth attempt—what he called his “final battle”—Ishiba, 67, emerged triumphant from a nine-strong field on promises to revitalize rural areas and win back public trust after a slew of scandals led to the stepping down of outgoing Prime Minister Fumio Kishida. Ishiba will assume the nation’s top job on Oct. 1 following a rubber-stamp parliamentary vote.


“Prime Minister Kishida has made a decision to let the LDP be reborn and win back the public's trust,” Ishiba said in his victory speech. “We must all pull together to respond to this.”

Ishiba’s leadership of the East Asian nation of 125 million has implications for global security given Japan’s increasingly prominent role alongside the U.S. checking China’s assertiveness in the Asia-Pacific. Under the outgoing Kishida, who announced he wouldn’t seek reelection last month amid plummeting popularity, Japan has beefed up defense spending and healed historical wounds with South Korea, another key regional U.S. ally.

A Tokyo native, Ishiba has both establishment and rebel credentials. He briefly worked in banking before embarking on his own political career following the death of his father, who was himself a lawmaker and cabinet member. He’s seen as distant from the right-wing faction of the party centered around the late Shinzo Abe, Japan’s longest-serving Prime Minister who was murdered in 2022, having reportedly turned down several cabinet posts under him.

That distance likely proved key in Ishiba’s victory. LDP elders recognized the need for change following public opprobrium regarding the Abe faction’s ties to the controversial Unification Church as well as the misuse of political funds. “Distrust grew in the Kishida administration because he didn’t really deal with the financial scandals of the LDP factions,” says Mieko Nakabayashi, a professor at Tokyo’s Waseda University and a former Japanese lawmaker.

Ishiba’s popularity was bolstered by his outspokenness on the need to properly investigate any malfeasance and for reforms to regain public confidence. Having previously served as agriculture minister and rural revitalization minister, Ishiba’s economic agenda focuses on revitalizing Japan’s outlying regions.

“He has the most credibility as somebody who understands the pain of the people,” says Jeff Kingston, director of Asian studies at Tokyo’s Temple University. “But he’s a blunt-spoken guy who doesn’t suffer fools easily, and many of his colleagues fit that bill. So he can seem arrogant and condescending to his fellow lawmakers.”

As a result, it’s perhaps unsurprising that Ishiba’s support lay more with LDP’s broad membership than fellow lawmakers, many of whom still regard him as a traitor for switching parties for several years in the 1990s. He was also the most populist of the main challengers and known for flip-flopping on various issues depending on public mood, including nuclear energy and whether a woman could serve as Emperor.

“There are many cases when he has changed his stance, so he is sometimes regarded as a weak leader who does not have really strong principles,” says Hosoya Yuichi, a professor of international politics at Keio University in Tokyo. “But at the same time, he is regarded as an experienced, reliable politician.”

Ishiba is one of only two of the leadership candidates who doesn’t speak English—remarkably, four of the nine were Harvard-educated—and is seen as a more conservative choice than his two closest challengers, who would have been either Japan’s youngest or first female leader. (The latter, Economic Security Minister Sanae Takaichi, was ahead on the first-round vote but was defeated by Ishiba in a runoff.)

Yet Ishiba also has a distinct maverick streak. He is one of the few LDP politicians to acknowledge Japanese mistakes in its 1910-45 colonization of Korea, which promises warmer ties with Seoul, though he has also openly called for the establishment of an Asian version of NATO, which may put him on collision course with Beijing.

Regarding U.S. ties, Ishiba has alarmed some by calling for a rebalancing of defense arrangements, with Japan taking more control and responsibility for its own security. He has a reputation as a security hardliner who is fond of building and painting models of aircraft and ships, which reportedly line his office walls, and he has previously voiced support for Japan developing its own nuclear deterrent. However, it’s unlikely he would deviate far from the U.S.-led orthodoxy. U.S. Ambassador Rahm Emanuel congratulated Ishiba in a post on X and said he looks forward to working with him to “cultivate even closer” U.S.-Japan ties.

“We will put our hearts into protecting Japan, local areas, rules, and the people of Japan,” Ishiba said Friday.


The Impact of Technology on Modern Society

 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS | September 27, 2024, Friday 

Gerd Altmann from Pixabay


In the 21st century, technology has become an integral part of daily life, affecting how people work, communicate, and even entertain themselves. Its influence can be seen across all sectors, from healthcare and education to manufacturing and entertainment. While technological advancements have brought numerous benefits, they also pose challenges that society needs to address to fully harness the potential of innovation. This article explores the positive and negative impacts of technology on various aspects of modern life.

The Role of Technology in Communication

One of the most significant ways technology has transformed society is through communication. With the advent of smartphones, the internet, and social media platforms, the way people interact has changed dramatically. Gone are the days when physical letters and landline phones were the primary modes of communication. Today, instant messaging, video calls, and social media allow people to connect with others globally, breaking down geographical barriers.

Moreover, technology has made it easier for individuals and organizations to share information. News, for example, can now be accessed in real time through mobile devices, and social media has given individuals the power to become content creators, sharing their experiences, opinions, and ideas with a wide audience. However, while technology has increased the speed and ease of communication, it has also led to issues such as the spread of misinformation and reduced face-to-face interactions, affecting personal relationships and social dynamics.

The Influence of Technology on Entertainment

The entertainment industry has seen significant changes due to technological advancements. From streaming services to gaming, technology has revolutionized how people consume entertainment. One sector that has particularly benefited from this is the online gambling industry. With the rise of digital platforms, individuals can now enjoy various forms of entertainment from the comfort of their homes, including online casinos.

When choosing the best 최고의 카지노 사이트, players have access to a variety of options that offer a wide range of games, from slots to poker. These platforms not only provide convenience but also integrate advanced technology such as live dealers, virtual reality, and secure payment methods to enhance the gaming experience. This technological shift has made casino gaming more accessible and appealing to a broader audience. However, it is important to be cautious and select reliable platforms that prioritize user security and responsible gambling.

Technology's Impact on Education

In recent years, technology has played a crucial role in reshaping education. Digital tools and platforms have made it easier for students and educators to access information and collaborate on a global scale. The COVID-19 pandemic, in particular, highlighted the importance of technology in education, as schools and universities around the world shifted to online learning. E-learning platforms, virtual classrooms, and educational apps became essential tools in continuing education during lockdowns.

This shift to digital learning has provided opportunities for more personalized education. Students can now learn at their own pace, access a wider range of resources, and develop digital skills that are crucial for the modern workforce. However, the digital divide remains a significant challenge, as not all students have equal access to technology, leading to disparities in educational opportunities.

Challenges and Ethical Concerns

While technology has brought about many positive changes, it also poses challenges that society must address. One major concern is the rise of automation and artificial intelligence, which threaten to displace jobs in various industries. While these technologies have the potential to increase productivity and efficiency, they also create uncertainty about the future of work and the potential for widening income inequality.

Additionally, concerns over data privacy and cybersecurity have grown as technology continues to advance. With more personal and sensitive information being shared online, individuals and organizations are at risk of cyberattacks, which can result in financial loss, identity theft, and data breaches. Ensuring that technology is used ethically and securely is crucial for building trust and protecting individuals in an increasingly digital world.
Conclusion

Technology continues to shape modern society in ways that were unimaginable just a few decades ago. While it has brought about significant benefits, it is essential to remain vigilant about the challenges and ethical concerns that come with it. By striking a balance between embracing technological advancements and addressing their potential downsides, society can ensure that technology remains a tool for positive change. From enhancing communication and entertainment to transforming education, technology has the power to create a more connected, informed, and efficient world if used responsibly.
How the US agrochemical lobby is meddling in the future of Kenyan farming

‘They didn’t tell me that the chemicals were harmful.’

Investigations
27 September 2024

Luis Tato/FAOA worker sprays pesticides in an area infested with desert locust near Lokichar, Turkana county, in 2020.







Anthony LangatMargot GibbsCynthia Gichiri, and Elena DeBre


Related stories

Human Rights
Conservation versus human rights: Kenya's Ogiek dilemma

Environment and Disasters
Why irrigation needs to think smaller to save Kenyan pastoralism

Republish this article


Eitor’s note: Part of an investigation led by Lighthouse Reports into highly hazardous pesticides and the PR firm v-Fluence. The investigation team includes: The New Humanitarian, The Guardian, Africa Uncensored, New Lede, Le Monde, ABC News Australia, The Continent, and The Wire.

Kenya has responded to rising food prices and climate shocks with a drive for intensive farming, but environmentalists warn that weak pesticide regulation and pressure from the US agrochemical lobby are putting the health of farmers and the wider public at risk.

President William Ruto has said that Kenya needs to become agriculturally self-reliant to save millions of dollars in food imports, and has backed this goal with a farmer-support programme he says is aimed at “putting the shame of hunger behind us once and for all”.

More than 75% of the agrochemicals used in Kenya in 2020 – the latest figures publicly available – are categorised as Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs), which means they pose serious health risks to humans and the environment, according to the Route to Food, an initiative that promotes food security in Kenya.

Among those HHPs is paraquat, manufactured by the Swiss-based agro-technology giant Syngenta, which has increasingly been linked to Parkinson’s disease – an incurable degenerative brain disorder. Banned in the EU, paraquat remains legally available in Kenya.

An investigation, led by Lighthouse Reports with reporting from The New Humanitarian and other international media outlets, has found that a “reputation management” firm – partly funded by US taxpayers – has been quietly undermining efforts to protect people in parts of Africa and Asia from the health threats posed by hazardous pesticides.

v-Fluence, the Missouri-based company, provides self-described services that include “intelligence gathering”, “proprietary data mining”, and “risk communications”.

The company is named as co-defendants in a US legal case against Syngenta by a woman and her son – Donna and James Evitts – who both suffer from Parkinson’s disease and claim it is linked to decades of paraquat use. v-Fluence is accused of helping the Chinese-owned firm suppress information on the risks of the herbicide for over 20 years. 

Our investigation reveals that v-Fluence has won US government contracts worth more than $400,000 to undertake similar work to “neutralise” – the wording of the US lawsuit – critics of “modern agriculture approaches” in Africa and Asia.

That included the creation of a private, members-only portal for pesticide company employees and influential allies, which enabled them to access personal information about hundreds of individuals from around the world deemed a threat to industry interests.

‘They didn’t tell me that the chemicals were harmful’

Awareness of Parkinson's disease is low in Kenya, as with most countries in the Global South. Specialists are few, misdiagnosis is common, and stigma acts as a further barrier to seeking the treatment that can slow its progression. 

When John Kiunjuri first noticed his hands shaking, he didn’t think much of it. He had been employed in his mid-40s by a commercial farm growing vegetables and flowers for export in Meru, eastern Kenya, where his work included mixing herbicides – without gloves or a mask – and he didn’t initially make any connection.

After his contract ended in 1998, the tremors worsened. By 2016, he couldn’t hold a teacup. A doctor at Nanyuki General Hospital eventually diagnosed Parkinson’s disease, and told him that his condition could have been a result of the agrochemicals he had handled.

“They didn’t tell me that the chemicals were harmful,” said Kiunjuri of his former employer. “If they had done so, I would have left earlier.”

Kiunjuri, now 75, doesn’t know the names of the pesticides he was exposed to, but he does recognise the packaging of Syngenta’s paraquat as one of them.

The African Center for Corrective and Preventive Action, a legal aid NGO, and Kenyan lawyer Kelvin Kubai, are suing a raft of agrochemical firms – including Syngenta East Africa – on behalf of Kiunjuri and other former farm labourers whose health has allegedly been affected by handling paraquat and other HHPs.

Meanwhile, the Evitts case is just one out of thousands being brought in the United States by people alleging they developed Parkinson’s after exposure to paraquat. The first US trial is scheduled to begin in February.

When asked for comment, Syngenta denied the allegations made in the Evitts lawsuit and said scientific studies “do not support the claim of a causal link between exposure to paraquat and the development of Parkinson’s disease”. The company did not answer questions about v-Fluence, saying it would address those claims in court.

Despite Syngenta’s denial of any evidence of a connection between paraquat and Parkinson’s, new research published this year in the International Journal of Epidemiology says there is an “indication” of increased risk.

‘They are definitely compromised’

Pesticide companies claim their products are safe if properly handled, but the reality at the field level is that farmers are extremely vulnerable. They often don’t have basic protective gear like masks and gloves, are unlikely to have had proper training on applying the chemicals, and the printed instructions on the products are rarely in a language commonly spoken in the area.

Kenya is a rapidly growing market for agrochemicals, and campaigners have tried to keep the most dangerous off the shelves – pesticides believed to cause cancersbirth defects, and to disrupt hormonal and nervous systems.

Kenya’s Pest Control and Products Board (PCPB) is a statutory body that regulates the importation and safe use of agrochemicals. Yet out of all the HHPs registered and legally sold by international companies in Kenya, nearly half are banned in the EU and the United States.

In 2019, Kenyan MPs launched a parliamentary inquiry into more than 200 of these HHPs, but the process has since stalled, with many of the agrochemicals that the lawmakers wanted banned still on the Kenyan market.

Part of the problem is that the PCPB is both understaffed and underfunded. It has a cosy relationship with pesticide manufacturers, and tends to rely on their research into the long-term effects of their products. 

“They are definitely compromised,” said MP Gladys Shollei, who tabled a public petition that led to the 2019 parliamentary inquiry. “They are in bed with the agrochemical companies because it's big money.”

The PCPB did not respond to questions before publication.

In 2021, civil society organisations again urged the PCPB to introduce regulations on HHPs. They called for priority to be given to 30 active ingredients that left dangerously high residue on fruits and vegetables.

Last year, the PCPB finally introduced new guidelines for the phased withdrawal of nine active ingredients by the end of 2024, but paraquat was not among them.

Campaigners are still waiting for the PCPB’s regulatory review of the broader list of more than 200 HHPs, including all carcinogenic, mutagenic, endocrine disruptors, and neurotoxic pesticides. Rights groups have called on the board to “expedite and publish the findings”.

Shaping public opinion 

v-Fluence is run by Jay Byrne, a former senior US Agency for International Development (USAID) official who went on to head corporate communications at the biotechnology company, Monsanto. 

Between 2013 and 2019, v-Fluence was hired by USAID to provide support for its programmes in Africa, including by encouraging the use of powerful pesticides and the adoption of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs).

The main contract, funded by USAID, was with the Washington-based International Food Policy Research Institute, or IFPRI.

v-Fluence’s role was the “sensing/monitoring” of biotechnology issues deemed important to the success of US-backed agricultural programmes, according to the statement of work document seen by The New Humanitarian. This was to counter what v-Fluence termed “opportunistic stakeholders who had become prolific at generating and promulgating content that is critical of modern agriculture approaches”, the document says. 

v-Fluence went on to create Bonus Eventus, a members-only agriculture forum dominated by agrochemical industry professionals and also containing some US government officials, which has been used to coordinate efforts to undermine pesticide reduction.

Byrne denied that v-Fluence had “any past or current contracts” with USAID or the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), but it was unclear if his denial included subcontracted work. In a statement to the investigation, he also denied that the company engaged in any “unethical, illegal, or otherwise inappropriate outreach, lobbying, or related activities”.

Yet Bonus Eventus has compiled detailed profiles of around 500 campaigners, scientists, and environmentalists perceived to be working against agrichemical interests.

These profiles – described as “background on the critics” – include people’s photos, addresses, telephone numbers, and even details on their families. Many of the pages also feature a “criticisms” section, containing negative information about the individual. 

Category tags on these “wiki”-style pages allow forum members to browse through topics of particular interest, such as "pesticide advocacy", "water-climate advocacy", or "PFAS [so-called forever chemicals] advocacy", to identify “critics” active in those issue areas. 

These include prominent African environmental campaigners and civil society organisations. At least 11 Kenyans – from NGO activists to politicians and journalists – are listed as “critics” on the Bonus Eventus site. 

One of them, Hellen Ngema, a sustainable agriculture expert, had no idea she had been profiled, had not given her permission, and said she felt “threatened” as a result of being named. 

“I feel like that if I'm profiled, I can actually be targeted by criminals, so that the voice of the people I represent – the smallholder farmers in Kenya – are not heard,” she told The New Humanitarian.

Records obtained by this investigation suggest that the Bonus Eventus forum was at least partly funded by USAID’s Program for Biosafety Systems (PBS), the US government’s key project to introduce GM technology in Africa.

As part of v-Fluence's 2014 contract with the PBS, the company said it would “create a private social network portal" where PBS collaborators could "share monitoring information, research, ongoing training, and tactical support". And in response to written questions to this investigation, Byrne said the “stakeholder tracking” and “issue research” described in the contract was provided via the Bonus Eventus wiki. 

In June 2019, the World Food Preservation Centre (WFPC) – an NGO that works with researchers on stemming post-harvest losses – had planned to hold a conference in Nairobi, Kenya. The aim was to provide regional policymakers with the best science about pesticide reduction and alternative farming techniques.

Records obtained through freedom of information (FOI) requests show that Byrne sent out one of his regular weekly newsletters in February 2019 to members of the Bonus Eventus network, warning that proposed speakers at the conference included “anti-science critics of conventional agriculture”, and that “promotional materials include claims that GMOs and pesticides may cause cancer and other diseases”.

The following day, in an email seen by The New Humanitarian, Margaret Karembu, an influential Kenyan biotech policymaker – and early member of Bonus Eventus – wrote to US Foreign Agriculture Service officials in Nairobi, warning that the “[pesticides conference] is a big concern and we need to strategise”.

Days later, WFPC received an email from the African Development Bank (AfDB), one of the key funders, announcing the withdrawal of its sponsorship. Martin Fregene, director of agriculture and agro-industry at AfDB, wrote: “I am afraid the aforementioned conference is one-sided and sends a wrong message about the AfDB's position on agricultural technologies approved for use by regulatory bodies.”

In an emailed response to The New Humanitarian, an AfDB spokesperson said the Bank had been contacted by Syngenta, which had “expressed concerns” that the conference “was one-sided”. On that basis, the AfDB had pulled its support, the spokesperson said.

Byrne denied v-Fluence had a role in the withdrawal of sponsorship for the conference. 

Charles Wilson, WFPC director and a former research scientist at USDA, said he had felt that “unseen forces” had been operating “in the background against our conference”. He added that labelling certain speakers as “anti-science” was part of an “old industry playbook, to attempt to squash legitimate areas of scientific inquiry before they take root”.

Another route to self-sufficiency

A number of Bonus Eventus members are active pro-pesticide and GMO opinion-column writers. In the months after the parliamentary petition to ban HHPs was launched, dozens of articles were written about the threat the proposal posed for Kenyan food production. 

“They [agrochemical companies] were on TV, they were making phone calls, sending people to make phone calls to me to threaten me to stop the campaign,” Shollei, the Kenyan MP, told The New Humanitarian. “They told Kenyans [that] if we stop selling these pesticides in the country, it is going to affect food security, there will be no food.”

“While the shift to chemically intensive agriculture has been promoted as increasing food production, these practices have actually led to more hunger rather than less.” 

James Njoroge, a v-Fluence “senior counsel”, is a prolific op-ed writer. He is especially scathing of agroecology – a climate-smart farming philosophy that shuns synthetic fertilisers and herbicides.

Although agroecology was endorsed by African Union heads of states in 2011, he regards it as a European fad that denies African producers access to modern technologies, restricting them to little more than “peasant farmers”.

Many of Njoroge’s articles are tagged on the media monitoring section of the private networking site of Bonus Eventus as “BE Credit” – suggesting the platform possibly takes credit for his articles. 

Byrne said Njoroge was not under contract with v-Fluence at the time, and that the firm had “never engaged him to produce content, publish articles, or other activities”. He said their monitoring site had dozens of coding tags and that, “none convey or represent any relationship with or influence over the content authors and publishing sources”.

A number of other authors with a similar ideological position are also listed on the database, with their articles appearing in some of Kenya’s most influential newspapers, including the Daily Nation and Standard.

They also tout conventional, high-input farming – the so-called “green revolution” approach – which promotes expensive chemical pesticides, fossil fuel-based fertilisers, and commercial seeds.

However, research suggests problems with the “modern” model. An evaluation in 2021 of the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), a flagship initiative backed by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, found it had failed to increase incomes and food security for 30 million farming households it had targeted in 11 focus countries over a 15-year period. That was despite AGRA attracting roughly $1 billion in funding.

Following a record-breaking 2022 drought, which left four million people facing severe food shortages, Kenya launched a subsidy-based agricultural drive. In October of that year, the cabinet also lifted a ban on GMOs that had been introduced a decade earlier to protect small-scale farmers – although a legal challenge means the embargo remains in place.

Campaigners for a more sustainable agricultural approach have faulted Kenya’s capital-intensive conventional farming strategy. They say there is growing evidence of the success of agroecology – and of alternative integrated pest management techniques – in improving both productivity and people’s livelihoods.

“While the shift to chemically intensive agriculture has been promoted as increasing food production, these practices have actually led to more hunger rather than less,” Elizabeth Atieno, of Greenpeace Africa, told The New Humanitarian.

The damage done to soil and water bodies – essential for long-term food production – undermines the land's ability to sustain agricultural productivity over time, she added, noting: “While the Kenyan government’s policies aim to modernise agriculture, the potential costs to public health and environmental integrity are too significant to overlook.”

Edited by Obi Anyadike.

Sri Lanka orders investigation into visa outsourcing contract with Indian firms

A forensic audit has been ordered on Indian firms GBS Technology and IVS Global FZCO along with VFS Global

PTI Colombo Published 27.09.24, 


Representational imageFile picture

The new Sri Lanka government headed by President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has ordered a forensic audit into the visa outsourcing contract with Indian firms alongside a Dubai-based firm allegedly involved in a scandal on arrival visa system for tourists.

A forensic audit has been ordered on Indian firms GBS Technology and IVS Global FZCO along with VFS Global which were in April awarded the multimillion-dollar contract as a technology partner to process the visa applications of foreigners, Vijitha Herath, Public Security Minister said.

“We have initiated an immediate forensic audit to investigate irregularities," Herath said.

This comes after the Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered to remand Controller of Immigration and Emigration Harsha Ilukpitiya for contempt of court charges for his failure to implement an apex court order on the ongoing disputed system on the issue of on-arrival electronic tourist visas to the country.

Herath said the airport immigration from Thursday night onwards reverted to using the previous system which existed before mid-April.

“The visa facility provided by VFS Global had caused significant difficulties for many," Herath added.

The court was hearing a fundamental rights petition filed by opposition politicians who called the outsourced visa operation a scam and urged for its suspension.

Under the outsourcing agreement, any foreigner entering Sri Lanka was required to pay USD 25 to have their application processed -- even citizens of countries that had visa-free travel arrangements with Sri Lanka.



The court in July ordered the immigration controller to halt the outsourced operation and revert to the previous system.
Africa

Two women in Comoros detained on gay sex charges after marriage bid




There has been a growing crackdown on same-sex relations in some African countries in recent years, with tough anti-LGBTQ+ laws passed in Uganda and Ghana drawing strong condemnation from Western countries and rights campaigners.
Image: 123RF/nito500 / File photo


Police in Comoros detained two women on Saturday on charges of engaging in same-sex sexual activity after they asked an Islamic preacher to marry them, a public prosecutor said.

Gay sex is illegal in Comoros, a Muslim-majority archipelago nation in the Indian ocean which has a population of 870,000.


Public prosecutor Ali Mohamed Djounaid said the women were being held in pre-trial detention at a prison in the capital, Moroni, after a court appearance in which they were charged with having "unnatural sex".

"They are accused of acts that are contrary to good morals and against nature," Djounaid said. If convicted, the two women who are aged 22 and 25 could be jailed for up to two years, he added.

It was not immediately possible to reach a lawyer representing the women.

There has been a growing crackdown on same-sex relations in some African countries in recent years, with tough anti-LGBTQ+ laws passed in Uganda and Ghana drawing strong condemnation from Western countries and rights campaigners.

The Ugandan law enacted last year includes life imprisonment for gay sex and the death penalty for certain same-sex acts.

A report by the UK-based Human Dignity Trust, a rights group, said there were few known examples of anti-LGBTQ+ laws being enforced in the Comoros in recent years.

Reuters

EXCLUSIVE

African countries eye world’s first joint 'debt-for-nature' swap

Focus on threatened marine ecosystems

27 September 2024 - 
By Reuters

Those backing the broader "Great Blue Wall" conservation plan include Mauritius (pictured), Kenya, Madagascar,, Mozambique, Seychelles, Somalia, South Africa, Tanzania and the Comoros. Stock photo.
Image: 123RF/freeartist


At least five African countries are working on what could be the world's first joint "debt-for-nature" swap to raise at least $2bn (R34.42bn) to protect a coral-rich swathe of Indian Ocean, according to a global conservation group.


Debt-for-nature deals are becoming increasingly popular for poorer nations to pay for conservation. Bonds or loans are bought and replaced with cheaper debt, with savings used for environmental protection.


Ecuador, Barbados, Belize, Gabon and Seychelles have all made such swaps in recent years, but the African initiative would be the first to involve multiple countries sharing a distinct ecosystem.

Thomas Sberna, regional head for coastal and ocean resilience at the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), did not name the five African nations considering the joint swap deal. But he said those backing the broader "Great Blue Wall" conservation plan include Kenya, Madagascar, Mauritius, Mozambique, Seychelles, Somalia, South Africa, Tanzania and the Comoros.

First announced in 2021, the plan is backed by the US and British governments and aims to protect and restore 2-million hectares of ocean ecosystems by 2030, benefiting some 70-million people in coastal communities.

Sberna said such ambitious deals were important for speeding up conservation.

"If we want to really deliver a substantial impact in the next five years we cannot just continue issuing them one by one," said Sberna, who is involved in the talks.

Historically, countries have struggled to agree on issues such as fishing rights and who pays for environmental measures, so the hope is a regional deal will overcome that and attract investors. Getting more finance to help countries protect biodiversity is a central part of the next round of global talks in Colombia in October after a landmark deal in 2022 to protect 30% of the world's seas and land by the end of the decade.

With many countries on the front lines of the climate crisis heavily indebted and requiring up to 20% of their GDP to build resilience, Sberna said radical measures were needed.

"We need to leapfrog from 1%-2% of marine-protected or marine-conserved areas to 30% in less than 10 years," Sberna said. "There is no way we could really achieve using the same business as usual model."
Negotiations

Sberna said he hoped a blueprint for the deal could be agreed in time for a UN Oceans Conference next June.

Kenya, Tanzania and Mozambique have all lost significant portions of mangrove shoreline, coral reefs and fish stock since the 1980s, threatening loss of livelihoods, food security and income from tourism.

Key details such as how much of each country's debt is brought up and who decides and monitors how and where the conservation money is spent, all require lengthy negotiation.

Sberna said that to aid this process, the IUCN and others were looking at the idea of a specialist fund worth at least $2bn, made up of $500m (R8.60bn) of concessional funding and $1.5bn (R25.81bn) of bond swap money.

Sberna said discussions were also being held with some of the main multilateral development banks in the region about offering credit guarantees and insurance policies for the swap.

These are vital as they cut the interest rates countries have to pay on the new "blue" or "nature" bonds which replace their more costly existing debt.

At the same time, some of the region's ocean-reliant fishing, shipping and tourism companies were also looking at debt-for-nature swaps of their own, he said, declining to name them.

Whether the African group becomes the first to issue such a swap could depend on whether some Caribbean countries, which industry sources say are also looking at a similar plan for their reefs, are quicker to act.

Madagascar, whose 250 islands are home to some of the world’s largest coral reef systems and most extensive mangrove areas in the western Indian Ocean, confirmed it was in talks although there was still a way to go.

"Many partners have already come forward," the country's minister of finance Rindra Hasimbelo Rabarinirinarison told Reuters, "but negotiations are still at the appraisal stage".

Other countries did not provide a comment.
Unheard music found and released for the first time

Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan was considered one of the finest singers of Qawwali, a religious devotional music

Manny Masih & Jonathan Holmes
BBC News, West of England
Getty Images

Unheard recordings by the famed Pakistani singer Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan, who died 27 years ago, have been released for the first time.

The tapes were found in the archives of Real World Records, in Box, Wiltshire, created by Peter Gabriel.

Mr Khan made the recordings in 1990, but they went unissued at the time and the production team forgot they were made.

Odhrán Mullan, who found the tapes, said: "We were blown away by the musical performances on them."



Mr Mullan told Manny Massih how he made the discovery while cataloguing items in the record company's archives after they moved sites.

"When I started working there I was told he was the best singer who ever lived, and I didn't believe them, but when I listened I realised it was 100% true," he said.

The tapes had to be gently heated to remove moisture from them, before they could be transferred by experts.

"A tape that old can't just be played on the tape machine as it will damage it, and when it was digitised we knew the performances were incredible," Mr Mullan said.

Mr Gabriel, who founded WOMAD Festival, invited Mr Khan to perform there in 1985, bringing his style of music to a huge new audience.
Getty Images
Mr Khan also provded vocals for the soundtrack to Martin Scorsese’s The Last Temptation of Christ

Mr Khan was considered one of the world's finest Qawaali singers.

The genre emerged in what is now India and Pakistan in the 13th century. Qawaali groups feature a lead vocalist and side singers who improvise different melodies together.

His rediscovered tracks have been released on a new album, called Chain of Light.

Muhammad Ayyub, who introduced Mr Khan to Peter Gabriel in 1980, said: "I am delighted these recordings were found.

"People are excited all over the world about this release.

"Khan's tunes appealed so widely, and even today people are singing these songs.

"His legacy will last for centuries," he added.
At UN, Saudi Arabia announces international alliance to establish Palestinian state

‘Right to self-defense cannot justify killing of tens of thousands of civilians,’ says Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan at UN headquarters in New York

Ibrahim Sipahi |27.09.2024 - 

Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan

ISTANBUL

Saudi Arabia has announced the creation of an international alliance aimed at establishing a Palestinian state and implementing a two-state solution.

“Today, on behalf of the Arab and Islamic nations, along with our European partners, we announce the launch of the International Alliance to Implement the Two-State Solution. We invite you to join this initiative,” Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan told a Thursday ministerial meeting on the Palestinian issue and efforts for peace.

Speaking on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York, he did not give further details on the alliance, but made the case for such an international effort.

Faisal decried the “catastrophic humanitarian crisis” caused by the war in Gaza and the “severe violations committed by Israeli occupying forces in the West Bank,” said the Saudi Press Agency (SPA).

He described these actions as part of a “broader policy of occupation and violent extremism.”

"The right to self-defense cannot justify the killing of tens of thousands of civilians, systematic destruction, forced displacement, the use of starvation as a weapon of war, incitement to hatred, dehumanization, or the use of systematic torture, including sexual violence and other documented crimes according to United Nations reports," he said.

On escalating violence in the region, including Israel’s continuing attacks on Lebanon, Faisal warned of a potential wider conflict: "We are witnessing a dangerous regional escalation that affects our brotherly nation of Lebanon and threatens to ignite a regional war that endangers our region and the entire world."

Faisal urged “an immediate halt to the ongoing war and all violations of international law.”

He also questioned the credibility of the international system, saying: “We must ask ourselves what remains of the credibility and legitimacy of the global order when we stand powerless to stop the war machine, while some insist on selectively applying international law in blatant violation of the most basic standards of equality, freedom, and human rights."

He reiterated that the establishment of an independent Palestinian state is a fundamental right and the foundation for peace, not merely a final outcome to be negotiated in a distant political process.

"We commend the countries that have recently recognized Palestine, and we call on all nations to show courage and take the same step, joining the international consensus represented by the 149 countries that have already recognized Palestine," he said.

Hezbollah and Israel have been engaged in cross-border warfare since the start of Israel's war on Gaza, which has killed more than 41,500 people, most of them women and children, following a cross-border attack by Hamas last October.

* Writing by Ikram Kouachi