Friday, December 06, 2024

Kurds' dream of self-rule under threat as Turkish-backed forces sweep across Syria


Analysis


Islamist rebels and armed groups backed by Ankara swept across Syria this past week, seizing Aleppo and putting President Bashar al-Assad’s soldiers to flight. Having achieved a hard-won autonomy in the turmoil of the Syrian Civil War, the country’s Kurds now find themselves once again cornered between the Damascus regime, Islamist insurgents and Turkish-backed troops eager to put an end to Kurdish self-rule.



Issued on: 05/12/2024 
By: Paul MILLAR
A Syrian Kurdish woman, fleeing from north of Aleppo, stands leaning on a bullet-riddled wall upon arriving in Tabqa, on the western outskirts of Raqa, on December 4, 2024. © Delil Souleiman, AFP


As Israel and Hezbollah settled into an uneasy ceasefire last week, armed Islamist opposition forces stormed out of Syria’s northwest, seizing the nation’s second city Aleppo over the weekend before advancing south on the road to Damascus.

While the forces of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) – an offshoot of al Qaeda’s former Syria branch Jabhat al-Nusra – surged inwards from Idlib, another assault came pouring down from the northern borderlands with Turkey. These groups – backed by Ankara and calling themselves the Syrian National Army – began to seize territory northeast of Aleppo, including the town of Tal Rifaat and surrounding villages on December 1.

But Tal Rifaat was not being held by Assad’s loyalists. Instead, the Syrian National Army has once again set its sights on territory held by the Kurdish People’s Protection Units (YPG), the iron core of the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) – a key Western ally in the fight against the Islamic State (IS) group.

The fighting has been fierce. Already, tens of thousands of Kurds have begun the long winter march east across the Euphrates River, where the Kurdish-led SDF still holds sway. In Aleppo, where SDF troops have held the Kurdish neighbourhoods of Ashrafiyeh and Sheikh Maqsoud throughout the civil war, the triumphant HTS negotiated the Kurdish troops' withdrawal from the city, weapons still in hand. Hours after Aleppo fell, footage emerged of convoys of Kurdish fighters filing out of the city under the watchful gaze of HTS troops.

Worse may await them beyond the city limits. Having seized a hard-won autonomy in the early days of the Syrian Civil War, the country’s Kurds have for the past few years come under heavy assault by Turkey and the Syrian armed groups that it backs. Ankara views the autonomous Kurdish regions in Syria as a creation and extension of the Kurdish Workers' Party (PKK), a group that has for years fought for Kurdish self-rule and is banned in Turkey as a terrorist organisation.

Now, with Assad's global allies exhausted by wars of attrition in Ukraine and Lebanon, Ankara seems once again set on strangling the Kurdish dream of self-governance in the crib.

Surrender or die


Fawaz Gerges, professor of international relations at the London School of Economics, said that the militants' lightning assault could cost the Kurds dearly.

“The Kurds stand to lose the most,” he said. “Their very autonomy, the security of their communities. I think Turkey has been biding its time and waiting for the right moment to strike, and the pro-Turkish opposition forces have really launched a shock attack, not only against the Assad government, but even against the Kurds. In Aleppo, the Kurds were told either to surrender or to die – and they decided to surrender.”

While HTS appears to be trying to avoid direct clashes with Kurdish forces, Kurdish civilians now living under the banners of the SNA have reported having their homes seized by Turkish-backed troops. As many as half a million Kurds are believed to live in Aleppo and surrounding towns and villages west of the Euphrates. Just what their lives are likely to be like under the new dispensation remains a question that few are keen to learn the answer to.

Dara Salam, a teaching fellow at SOAS University of London's department of politics and international studies, said that Kurdish communities in Syria's northwest were now once again at the mercy of Ankara's ambitions.

“The sole aim of Turkey-backed SNA is to implement Turkey's Syria policy, that is, destroying the Kurdish entity and having the upper hand over Assad's regime in Syria,” he said. “As the conflict in the past days unravels, Kurds once again face displacement, massacres and persecution at the hands of these jihadi-Islamist groups in many places like Aleppo, Tal Rifaat and Shahba.”

For years now, that policy has been put into increasingly bloody practice. In 2018, Turkish air strikes heralded the seizure of Afrin, the western-most canton of the Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria – more commonly known as Rojava. The occupying SNA has been accused of leading campaigns of mass violence against the Kurdish civilian population.

Dastan Jasim, a research fellow at the GIGA Institute for Middle East Studies, said Syria's Kurds had good reason to be fearful given what she described as years of abuses against Kurdish communities in parts of the country's northwest held by the SNA and Islamist opposition groups.

"The only basis on which Kurds can judge that question is their own experience," she said. "We’re heading towards six years of occupation of Afrin, for example, and Kurdish life in Afrin is a living hell – it’s basically impossible. Sexual violence is rampant, there have been kidnappings of people – just ordinary Kurdish people that are accused out of the blue of being PKK sympathisers are being abducted and killed."
‘In the eye of the storm’

Jasim said that the country's Kurdish communities had long struggled to find a place within the broader array of opposition forces that rose up against Assad more than a decade ago.

“In 2011 when the opposition came up, let’s remember that especially in Aleppo the Kurdish neighbourhoods were very active when it was about protesting against Assad,” she said. “People were obviously not happy with the situation – there have been many Kurdish uprisings that were attacked very violently. But at the same time, the Kurds saw there was no space for them, there was no space for a discussion of Kurdish autonomy, Kurdish self-rule. A lot of the elements are very nationalist, and that’s what we’re seeing right now.”


42:45

Having proved themselves to be a fierce and disciplined force against the emerging Islamic State group, the Kurds soon found themselves leading the US-backed SDF. Despite frictions between Washington and Ankara over US support for what Turkey considered to be violent separatist groups, the SDF played a crucial role in reclaiming territory from the Islamic State group.

Since then, though, the Kurds have been increasingly isolated. In 2019, then US president Donald Trump announced his plans to pull the last remaining American troops from Syria, leaving the Kurds undefended in the face of Turkey's advance.

Although Trump's generals managed to convince the president to keep a contingent of troops in the region to secure oil fields, guard against Islamic State group remnants and maintain pressure on Iran, it was a bitter blow for a community already under assault by a US ally and NATO member. Now, with Israel hammering Iran-backed groups across Syria and Trump set to return to the White House in January, Gerges said that forces across the Middle East were anxious to strengthen their hands before inauguration day.

“This is just the beginning – I think what Turkey and its Syrian allies are trying to do is to really basically change the current balance of power on the Turkish-Syrian borders before Trump enters the White House,” he said. “They’re using the retreat of the Assad forces as a means to weaken and degrade the pro-American Kurdish forces. All in all it’s not just that the Assad government is losing territories, but I think the Kurds are also in the eye of the storm. And I think by the end of the current round, their areas will shrink, their power will be degraded and they will be facing bitter choices.”

Gerges said that the next days and weeks of fighting could determine the very survival of the Kurds' long-held dream of self-governance.

“This is what’s going on in the Kurds’ minds – that’s why they called a general mobilisation,” he said. “This is one of the few times that they’re facing in their view a threat of this dimension. It’s no longer really a military threat, it goes to the very heart of what they’ve been trying to achieve since 2011 – full autonomy and a pathway to statehood.”

Syria rebel leader says goal is to overthrow Assad

By AFP
December 6, 2024

A Syrian rebel fighter cheers as he enters the central city of Hama 
- Copyright AFP Bakr ALKASEM


Layal Abou Rahal

Rebel forces pressing a lightning offensive in Syria aim to overthrow President Bashar al-Assad’s rule, their Islamist leader said in an interview published on Friday.

The Islamist-led rebels were at the gates of Syria’s Homs, a war monitor said, after wresting other key cities from government control.

In little over a week, the offensive has seen Syria’s second city Aleppo and strategically located Hama fall from President Bashar al-Assad’s control for the first time since the civil war began in 2011.

Should the rebels capture Homs, that would cut the seat of power in the capital Damascus from the Mediterranean coast, a key bastion of the Assad clan.

By Friday morning, the rebels were just five kilometres (three miles) from the edge of Homs, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitor.

Abu Mohammed al-Jolani, the leader of the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) rebel alliance, said the goal of the offensive was to overthrow Assad’s rule.

“When we talk about objectives, the goal of the revolution remains the overthrow of this regime. It is our right to use all available means to achieve that goal,” Jolani told CNN in an interview.

The rebel alliance conducting the offensive that began on November 27 is led by HTS, which is rooted in the Syrian branch of Al-Qaeda but has sought to moderate its image in recent years.

Fearing the rebels’ advance, tens of thousands of members of Assad’s Alawite minority were fleeing Homs on Thursday, residents and the Observatory said.

Khaled, who lives on the city’s outskirts, told AFP that “the road leading to (coastal) Tartus province was glowing… due to the lights of hundreds of cars on their way out”.

Homs was the scene of a months-long government siege of opposition areas and deadly sectarian attacks in the early years of the civil war.

Early in the war, which began with Assad’s brutal crackdown on democracy protests, activists referred to the city as “the capital of the revolution” against the government.

– ‘Extremely afraid’ –


Haidar, 37, who lives in an Alawite-majority neighbourhood, told AFP by telephone that “fear is the umbrella that covers Homs now”.

“I’ve never seen this scene in my life. We are extremely afraid, we don’t know what is happening.”

After the government lost control of Aleppo and Hama, air strikes targeted a bridge on the highway linking Hama and Homs, the Observatory said.

But on Friday, the rebel alliance “entered the cities of Rastan and Talbisseh” on the main road between Hama and Homs, the monitor added, saying that the factions were faced with “a total absence” of government forces.

The Syrian defence ministry said the army launched strikes against “terrorist” fighters in Hama province.

The Observatory, which relies on a network of sources in Syria, said 826 people, mostly combatants but also including 111 civilians, have been killed since the offensive began last week.

The United Nations said that the violence has displaced 280,000 people, warning that numbers could swell to 1.5 million.

Many of the scenes witnessed in recent days would have been unimaginable earlier in the war.

The rebels announced on Telegram their capture of Hama following street battles with government forces, describing it as “the complete liberation of the city”.

Rebel fighters kissed the ground and let off volleys of celebratory gunfire as they entered the city on Thursday.

Many residents turned out to welcome the rebel fighters. An AFP photographer saw some residents set fire to a giant poster of Assad on the facade of city hall.

The army admitted losing control of the city, though Defence Minister Ali Abbas insisted that the army’s withdrawal was a “temporary tactical measure”.

– ‘Massive blow’ –

In a video posted online, HTS leader Jolani said his fighters had entered Hama to “cleanse the wound that has endured in Syria for 40 years”.

He was referring to an army massacre in Hama in the 1980s that targeted people accused of belonging to the banned Muslim Brotherhood.

In another message on Telegram congratulating “the people of Hama on their victory,” he used his real name, Ahmed al-Sharaa, instead of his nom de guerre for the first time.

Aron Lund, a fellow of the Century International think tank, called the loss of Hama “a massive, massive blow to the Syrian government”.

Should Assad lose Homs, it wouldn’t mean the end of his rule, Lund said.

“But at that point, without Aleppo, Hama or Homs, and with no secure route from Damascus to the coast, I’d say it’s over as a credible state entity,” he added.

UN chief Antonio Guterres said Thursday that the escalation in Syria is the result of a “chronic collective failure” of diplomacy.

The rebels launched their offensive in northern Syria the same day a ceasefire took effect in the war between Israel and Hezbollah in neighbouring Lebanon.

Both Hezbollah and Russia have been crucial backers of Assad’s government, but have been mired in their own conflicts in recent years.

Israel’s army said Friday it had conducted air strikes on Hezbollah “weapon-smuggling routes” on the Syria-Lebanon border, just over a week into the fragile ceasefire in their war.

Damascus gripped by anxiety in face of rebel offensive


By AFP
December 6, 2024

Syrians chat at a cafe in the historic Old City of Damascus. 
- Copyright AFP Eitan ABRAMOVICH

Like many others in the Syrian capital Damascus, student Shadi chose to stay home so he could keep up with the pace of events since rebels launched a shock offensive last week.

“I had no wish to go out and everyone chose to stay in to follow the news surrounded by their loved ones,” said Shadi, who did not wish to give his full name.

As the rebels have taken city after city in quick succession, many Syrians have been wracked by uncertainty, fearing a revival of the worst days of Syria’s grinding civil war now in its 14th year.

“We don’t understand anything anymore. In just one week, the twists and turns have been so overwhelming that they are beyond all comprehension,” the young man said.

“The worry is contagious but we have to keep our cool,” he said, never once taking his eyes off the alerts on his mobile phone.

Syrian rebels, led by Islamist militant group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), launched the shock offensive on November 27, sweeping from their stronghold in the northwest to capture swathes of northern and central Syria including the major cities of Aleppo and Hama.

Government forces have launched a counteroffensive seeking to repel the rebels but at the cost of relaxing their grip on other parts of the country, notably the east where Kurdish-led forces have taken over.

“Whenever rumours spread, people rush to buy various products, bread, rice, sugar and detergents,” said Amine, 56, who runs a grocery store in the Sheikh Saad neighbourhood of the capital.

“Today, I bought twice from my wholesaler to keep up with demand.”



– Exams delayed –



The offensive has already sent food prices skyrocketing by 30 percent in Damascus, according to residents.

The Syrian pound is trading at an all-time low of 19,000 to the dollar, down from 15,000 before the rebels launched their offensive on Wednesday of last week.

Security measures — already strict before the offensive — have been beefed up, with extra car searches, particularly on vehicles coming from outside the capital, according to residents.

Concerns have been further driven by the spread of disinformation and rumours.

The Syrian defence ministry has denounced “fabricated” videos, including of explosions at the headquarters of the general staff, calling on citizens not to fall prey to “lies” that “aim to sow chaos and panic among civilians”.

In the usually lively neighbourhood of Bab Sharqi, restaurants and cafes are near-deserted in the evening, with some even closing up early due to the absence of customers.

Damascus University has delayed end-of-term exams and the Syrian football federation has postponed matches until further notice.

State news agency SANA reported that at Friday prayers, imams called on the faithful “not to panic… and to stand as one behind the Syrian Arab Army to defend the homeland”.

Georgina, 32, said she had “heard a lot of rumours”.

“I went to Old Damascus and saw a normal situation,” she said, adding that nonetheless “everyone was keeping an eye on the news”.

Meanwhile, some radio stations have switched from variety programming to non-stop news segments.

On state television, programmes host analysts and witnesses on the ground, including those denying “rumours” of fresh territorial losses to the advancing rebels.



HTS rebel group sweeping Syria tries to shed its jihadist image


Analysis

Unexpected alliances, seeing strength in "diversity" – Syria's Islamist insurgent group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a former branch of al Qaeda, is trying to soften its public image in a bid to become one of Syria’s key political players. After seizing Aleppo in a lightning offensive, the armed group on Thursday broke Damascus’s hold on the crucial city of Hama.


Issued on: 05/12/2024 - 
By: Bahar MAKOOI
Abu Mohamed al-Golani, head of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), an Islamist insurgent group led by Al-Qaeda's former Syria branch, poses for a selfie during a press conference near the Bab al Hawa border crossing in northern Syria, March 12, 2024.
 © Omar Haj Kadour, AFP


They took Aleppo in less than three days. Now, the city of Hama, a crucial point on the road to Damascus – and the regime of President Bashar al-Assad – has also fallen. Who are the Islamist rebels of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, the driving force behind a lightning offensive that has caught the Syrian regime so utterly off guard?

The "Organisation for the Liberation of the Levant", more commonly known by its initials HTS, was the Syrian branch of al Qaeda before disassociating itself in 2016. The group owes much to its strategically minded leader Abu Mohammad al-Golani. This Syrian fighter, a former member of the Islamic State in Iraq – which later expanded into the Islamic State group – founded al-Nusra Front in 2012 before pledging allegiance to al Qaeda in 2013. The two groups reportedly severed ties by mutual agreement three years later.

An image grab taken from a video broadcast on July 28, 2016 by Dubai-based Orient News satellite television shows the head of Al-Nusra Front in Syria, Abu Mohammad al-Golani, giving a speech from an undisclosed location, in the first-ever video showing his face to be released. © AFP, HO

In January 2017, the former Nusra Front began trying to remake its image, declaring it had undergone an ideological transformation and adopting a new name – Hayat Tahrir al-Sham. The group also began to rid itself of some of its most radical figures – willingly or not.

‘A rigid, conservative Islamist group’

In the beginning of 2019, HTS fighters took control of most of Idlib province in Syria’s northwest – to the detriment of other rebel groups active in the area. In a 2023 interview with FRANCE 24’s Wassim Nasr in Idlib, the group’s leader Abu Mohammed al-Golani said that he was working to ensure that the areas under his control would not be used as rear bases for preparing attacks against the West.

Abu Maria al-Qahtani, one of the group’s leading figures also interviewed in Idlib, said that the group was doing “all [that they could] to stop the youngest men from joining al-Qaeda or IS by showing them that another path was possible with what had been put in place in Idlib”.

"Not only has the HTS group broken ties with al Qaeda, but it’s been fighting al Qaeda and Islamic State group on an equal footing for years,” Nasr said, describing HTS as a “rigid, conservative Islamist group”.

“It was even their fighters that killed the Islamic State group’s fourth caliph [Abu al-Hussein al-Husseini al-Qurashi] in August 2023,” he said.

Watch more  Domino effect? Assad's allies stretched thin as Syrian rebels pounce

Speaking on FRANCE 24, Arthur Quesnay, PhD candidate in political science at Paris’s Pantheon-Sorbonne University, said that HTS – now almost entirely made up of Syrian fighters – had become “a revolutionary Syrian group that is fighting a war in Syria and has stopped trying to wage a global jihad and strike at overseas targets, but is just here to take Damascus”.

According to Nasr, al-Golani maintains that he has put global jihad and international terror behind him, believing “that these things ‘bring nothing but destruction and failure’”. For the Islamist leader, his group “has no problem with the West, his problem is with the Syrian regime as well as the Iranians and Russians that support it”.

HTS and its leader are still designated as terrorist organisations by the United Nations, the US and a number of European countries – a fact that has put something of a crimp in al-Golani’s political ambitions.

“One of his objectives is to be taken off the international list of terrorist organisations so he can travel and become a leading Syrian political player,” Quesnay said.
The new normal

The rebel leader has not been idle. Al-Golani set up the so-called Salvation Government in Idlib, a local administration that serves as a kind of laboratory for what his rule could bring if extended over the whole country.

Nasr, who visited Idlib in 2023, said he had witnessed a limited freedom of religion, with Christian masses tolerated but no displays of crosses or ringing of church-bells allowed. He also described a policy of returning land occupied by foreign jihadists to their Syrian owners, even if they were Christians or Druze.

Ever pragmatic, al-Golani tried to win the support of those living in the territories his group had conquered, Quesnay said.

“In Idlib, the population is mostly Sufi – a popular and more classic form of Syrian Islam,” he said. “We’ve seen HTS evolve little by little, abandoning its original Salafist line to better adapt itself to those it was supposed to be governing. Other experts have noted that minorities such as the Druze and the Kurds also enjoyed some protection.



11:54© FRANCE 24

“It’s the first time that a group with jihadist roots – that is to say radical Islam – has shown itself to be open to other forms of Islam or other religions,” Quesnay said. “Certainly there has been localised repression against activists, but there have also been regular demonstrations against HTS, and in those cases, al-Golani engaged in the kinds of negotiations that we have usually seen elsewhere.”

“We need to be cautious in how we look at it, but it’s what they’ve been doing in Idlib for five years,” Nasr said. “HTS is far from espousing democratic values or those of a liberal society, but they have taken something of a turn – or found an unexpected third way.”
Charm offensive

Applying the same strategy after the conquest of Aleppo, al-Golani tried to reassure the population of his group’s goodwill – in particular towards the city’s religious and ethnic minorities. In a publicised statement, he called on his fighters not to mistreat the Christian community in Syria’s second city. “Treat them well,” he said, going on to tell local believers that HTS “had treated the Christians of Idlib and Aleppo well – you have nothing to fear”.

Speaking to the city’s large Kurdish minority, HTS offered a message of unity that would have been unimaginable just a few short years ago.


“You have the right to live freely … Diversity is a strength of which we are proud,” the group said in a statement verified by Nasr. “We denounce the actions of the Islamic State group against the Kurds, including the enslavement of women … We are with the Kurds to build the Syria of tomorrow.”

The Islamist rebel group also offered Kurdish fighters the possibility to leave the city with their families.

“They’re working on a corridor to evacuate those who now find themselves in [HTS] territory towards the Kurdish bastions in the northeast, and in good agreement with the YPG – the main Kurdish militia in Syria – which is not necessarily to Turkey’s liking,” Nasr said.

The apparent agreement with the Kurds could irritate the other rebel groups that took part in the seizure of Aleppo. Although HTS may have been the driving force behind the shock assault this past week, it’s not the only one that has been fighting to claim territory.


Partners of convenience

As Aleppo fell, HTS was supported on the northern front by the Syrian National Army (SNA) a coalition of a dozen rebel groups largely financed, equipped and trained by Turkey. Based across a long stretch of the Turkish border, these groups are united by a fierce anti-Kurdish sentiment.



“Ankara was surprised by HTS’s lightning offensive against Aleppo,” Nasr said. Faced with the new facts on the ground, Turkey launched the SNA into the fray “to cut any possible link between the Kurdish bastions of Syria’s northeast and those remaining in Aleppo”, as well as to prevent al-Golani from setting himself up as the sole master of the rebel-held area.

Although HTS and these Turkish-backed armed groups are often referred to as allies, Nasr said, they should more accurately be seen as being in a “balance of power that we can’t call friendly relations”. It’s a relationship marked by much friction – particularly on the Kurdish question.

Al-Golani has not been shy about publicly criticising the SNA’s armed groups – over the reported looting of a factory in Aleppo on December 3, for example.

For Ankara, returning the 3 million Syrian refugees currently residing in Turkey to their homeland is the main priority. A larger and more secure area under rebel control would certainly be a welcome step towards this goal. But it remains to be seen just how much Turkey is prepared to tolerate the fragile entente struck between HTS and the Kurds, who Ankara continues to see as its sworn enemies.

This piece has been adapted from the original in French by Paul Millar.

As Syrian rebels advance, what can Iran and its tired allies do for Assad?


Firas Makdesi/Reuters
People walk near a poster depicting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad after last week's rebel seizure of Aleppo marked the rebels' biggest offensive for years, in Damascus, Syria, Dec. 5, 2024.


By Scott Peterson Staff writer
@peterson__scott
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
Dec. 05, 2024|LONDON


Iran and its alliance of regional militias are seeking once again to defend the embattled regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, as Sunni Islamist rebels make swift territorial gains in a surprise offensive.

But the array of forces, supported by Russian air power, that prevailed over anti-Assad insurgents and preserved his rule a decade ago during the first phase of Syria’s devastating civil war, is weaker today, and not focused on Syria.

Iran and its regional “Axis of Resistance” fighters, chief among them Lebanese Hezbollah, are all degraded and distracted after more than a year of war with Israel.

Why We Wrote This story focused on  Resilience

What can Iran do to help Syrian President Bashar al-Assad defeat newly energized rebel forces? Its anti-Israel “Axis of Resistance” has been overworked and diminished. Yet even as Iran searches for solutions, there are some suggestions that it is not panicking.

Syrian government troops melted away in the face of the offensive launched last week from the rebel-held northwest province of Idlib. Within days, Islamist groups led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), which was once affiliated with Al Qaeda, had captured Syria’s second city of Aleppo.

By Thursday, rebels had taken control of Hama, 80 miles to the south. HTS, designated a terrorist group by the United States, sent messages to Syrian minority groups to reassure them of freedom and protection, prompting Aleppo Christians to put up Christmas decorations.

Nevertheless, there has been consternation but not panic in Iran about the investment of billions of dollars over many years, both to defend Mr. Assad and to create the Axis, which aims to counter Israeli and American influence in the Mideast.


Ghaith Alsayed/AP
Syrian opposition fighters stand atop a seized tank on the outskirts of Hama, Syria, Dec. 3, 2024.

Iran-backed Shiite militias from Iraq reportedly have sent hundreds of fighters to Syria, to help defend an Axis ally that serves as a critical weapons route between Iran and Lebanon. Hezbollah is also trying to mobilize for Syria, but its leadership has been decimated and its units degraded by 14 months of escalating conflict with Israel.

That fight culminated in a ceasefire coming into effect Nov. 27 – the day the Syrian rebels launched their offensive.

“This whole thing is coming at the worst moment for Iran and the Axis, and I think also explains the timing on the side of the rebels,” to take advantage of the relative weakness of Mr. Assad’s allies, says Hamidreza Azizi, an expert on Iran’s role in Syria at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs.

“Compared to a decade ago, Iran has fewer resources to invest in the Axis. ... So I can see why they are quite concerned,” he says.

Two pivotal events have changed the safety net dynamic for Mr. Assad and for Iran, Mr. Azizi says. The first was Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, which diverted Moscow’s focus and prompted it to withdraw some troops and hand over some bases to the Syrian army even as it kept an air capability in the country.

The second was the October 2023 attack by Axis-member Hamas on Israel. That triggered Hezbollah’s first rocket strikes on Israel in solidarity, as well as attacks from Iran-backed groups in Iraq and Yemen, ostensibly to stop Israel’s onslaught in Gaza.

“Obviously everybody in the Axis started to get distracted, and focused on the Gaza front, especially those actors whose presence was significant in the Syrian war,” Mr. Azizi says.

Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei complained on X this week that the Sunni extremists were "good news for enemies" of Islam by drawing the world’s attention away from the “issue of Palestine.”

“The current moment [in Syria] shows how significant the Iranian and Iran-backed manpower was, because they were able to prevent further advances by the rebels. But when there is nobody on the ground over those areas, they [the rebels] come again,” says Mr. Azizi. “That’s the problem: Airpower alone can’t secure victory.”

Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/AP/File
Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, right, speaks with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in Tehran, Iran, May 30, 2024.

To be sure, Israel has used airstrikes to kill several senior Iranian commanders of the Revolutionary Guard Qods Force, who were responsible for operations in Syria and Lebanon.

“What is Iran capable of doing, and not capable of doing? Clearly its command structure in Syria is damaged,” says Mohammad Ali Shabani, editor of the London-based news website Amwaj.media, which focuses on Iran, Iraq, and Arabian Peninsula countries.

Those networks, steeped in long-standing personal relationships, will take time to reestablish. But Iran can afford its military work in Syria, he says, and does not have an overall manpower problem, considering its past advisory role and the deployment of relatively few of its own troops.

“These are personal relationships that are hard to reconstitute,” says Mr. Shabani, noting for example Gen. Mohammad Reza Zahedi, who was killed by an Israeli airstrike in April on an Iranian diplomatic compound in Damascus.

General Zahedi was in charge of all the Levant and of funneling weapons to Lebanon and Syria. He was reportedly the only non-Lebanese person to sit on Hezbollah’s top Shura Council, while also exercising “veto power” over its subordinate military Jihad Council. His death triggered an unprecedented direct Iranian retaliation against Israel, with 300 missiles and drones.


Hassan Ammar/AP
Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah speaks via a video link during a ceremony to commemorate the death of Iranian Revolutionary Guard Gen. Mohammad Reza Zahedi, who was among those killed by an Israeli airstrike that demolished an Iranian consular building in Damascus, in the southern suburbs of Beirut, April 8, 2024.

“Many other, if not all, members of the Jihad Council are [also] dead. So they are all in a state of reconstituting these structures,” says Mr. Shabani, whose website first reported the significance of General Zahedi.

Nevertheless, Mr. Shabani explains why, practically and politically, Iran may not be more urgently coming to Mr. Assad’s aid.

“Do I believe [pro-Assad forces] can seize back all of Syria? No. They couldn’t even do that last year, or last month,” he says. “But is it enough to keep Assad in power? Pick up a map, and look at what Iran’s objectives are in Syria.”

Those objectives include ensuring cross-country routes for Iranian weapons to reach Lebanon and key destinations in Syria, including Damascus, areas close to the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, and Qusayr, where Hezbollah had a significant victory in 2012.

“[Rebels] have taken Aleppo. It’s a loss, for sure. But is this integral to Assad maintaining power? No. Is it integral to Iran’s core interests in Syria? No,” says Mr. Shabani. “I don’t see Iran rushing to Assad’s aid. Not because they don’t want to keep him in power … but because they want him to better appreciate their role.”

Four days after the rebel offensive erupted, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi flew to Damascus to reassure Mr. Assad. According to news reports, the two detailed the support that needs to be provided for Syria.

In a show of calm, Mr. Araghchi was later filmed eating at a fast-food restaurant in Damascus. But in a diplomatic push, he then flew to Ankara to meet his counterpart from Turkey, which has backed factions of the Syrian opposition.


Maxim Shemetov/Reuters
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian speaks at the BRICS summit in Kazan, Russia, Oct. 24, 2024.

Iranian media reported Monday that Iranian Qods Force Gen. Javad Ghaffari arrived in Damascus to lead Iranian “military advisers” and help the Syrian army battle the advancing rebels. He has often been lauded in Iran for safeguarding Aleppo in 2016, but earned the title “Butcher of Aleppo” by opponents of Iran who recall brutal tactics there.

In Parliament Dec. 1, Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian called on Muslim nations to “intervene and not allow America and Israel to take advantage” in Syria. Yet when asked on state television the next day about the chances of a direct Iranian military engagement in Syria, Mr. Pezeshkian twice dodged the question, and noted instead his government’s diplomatic efforts.

It is not yet clear if several hundred Iran-backed fighters from Iraq have made it to Syria, as reported, or if orders to fight have been given to those members of the Axis already on the ground in Syria, who are mostly Shiite Afghans.

As rebels advanced Thursday, the HTS commander, Abu Mohamed al-Jolani, issued a request to Iraqi politicians to “do their duty” to prevent Iran-aligned militias from intervening “in what is happening in Syria.”

EU and Mercosur trade bloc finalise free trade deal opposed by France


The European Union and South America's Mercosur trade bloc said Friday they had finalised a free trade agreement that has been decades in the making. But the deal faces a tortuous battle for approval in Europe given opposition from France and other member states.


Issued on: 06/12/2024 -
By: NEWS WIRES
European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen (centre) pictured with the leaders of Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil and Paraguay at a summit in Montevideo on December 6, 2024. © Eitan Abramovich, AFP


The European Union and the Mercosur trade bloc have agreed to terms for a long-anticipated free trade deal, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced in Montevideo on Friday.

The EU-Mercosur deal aims to create one of the largest free trade zones in the world, covering over 700 million people and nearly 25% of global GDP.

Much like the U.S.-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement, its goal is to reduce tariffs and trade barriers, making it easier for businesses on both sides to export goods.

Mercosur comprises Brazil — the lion’s share of the bloc’s territory, economic output and population — along with Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay and Bolivia, the newest member. Venezuela’s membership has been suspended indefinitely.


The deal is not the end of the story for the Europeans. France leads a group of member countries who still have objections to the pact, and all 27 member countries must endorse it for the agreement to enter force.

In remarks aimed at her “fellow Europeans,” and perhaps those more skeptical like farmers in France and elsewhere, von der Leyen said it would have a positive impact on around 60,000 companies that export to the Mercosur region.

She said they will “benefit from reduced tariffs, simpler customs procedures and preferential access to some critical raw materials. This will create huge business opportunities.”

“And to our farmers,” she said, “we have heard you listen to your concerns, and we are acting on them. This agreement includes robust safeguards to protect your livelihoods.

(AP)



 Thousands rally in Romania in support of pro-European presidential candidate



Thousands of Romanians gathered at University Square in central Bucharest on Thursday night to show their support for European values ahead of an election that polls say could see a radical far-right isolationist, who has been sympathetic to Russia, take power.


Issued on: 06/12/2024 
By: NEWS WIRES
01:44
People hold mobile phones with flashlights during a pro-European rally ahead of Romania's December 8 runoff presidential elections in Bucharest on December 5, 2024. © Vadim Ghirda, AP


Several thousand rallied in Romania on Thursday in support of a pro-European presidential candidate a few days before key elections, fearing their democratic rights were under threat.

Around 3,000 gathered at University Square in the capital Bucharest, waving European Union flags and chanting "Freedom" and "Europe".

In the first-round on November 24, far right outsider Calin Georgescu, a past admirer of Russian President Vladimir Putin, took the most votes, sparking fears about the future of the EU and NATO member and triggering protests especially among young people.

Georgescu is to face Elena Lasconi, the leader of the centrist, pro-EU USR party, in a run-off on Sunday.

"I fear that democracy is going to disappear in this country and this is what I don't want," said Liliana Rotaru, who works in the banking sector.

"I trust my people and hope that they will choose wisely and vote for the European Union and NATO," the 50-year-old added. "So that means for Mrs Lasconi."

Another protester, Radu Bourceanu, who works in human resources, said the protesters gathered to show "we are pro European" but said it was hard to predict the outcome of Sunday's vote "because, we have a mass manipulation through diverse, social media apps."

Romanian authorities have pointed to "massive" social media promotion, "manipulated" influencers and cyberattacks as they declassified documents detailing allegations against Georgescu and Russia.

"I'm really anxious, and I do really hope that democracy will win and the Russian influence will not prevail in Romanian elections," said Laura Boncu, 33.

"I don't know how our future will look if the Russian candidate, the pro-Russian candidate, will win," she said.

"I'm here to show that Romania is still a democracy, and we're fighting and we're showing up to be able to live tomorrow in a democracy."

Georgescu has in recent days avoided answering questions about his previous praise for Putin and his "Russian wisdom".

A critic of the EU and NATO, he says he does not want to leave either grouping but wants to put Romania "on the world map".

(AFP)



Romania's top court annuls presidential

 vote amid Russia interference fears


Romania's top court annulled the result of the first round of the country's presidential election on Friday, adding that the entire election process would have to be rerun. The decision came after security services warned the vote had been distorted by a massive Russian influence campaign in favour of far-right candidate Calin Georgescu.


Issued on: 06/12/2024 - 
By: NEWS WIRES

The Constitutional Court’s unprecedented decision follows a move to declassify intelligence on Russian interference in the election campaign. © Nicolae Dumitrache, AP

A top Romanian court on Friday annulled the first round of the country's presidential election, days after allegations that Russia ran a coordinated online campaign to promote the far-right outsider who won the first round.

The Constitutional Court’s unprecedented decision — which is final — came after President Klaus Iohannis declassified intelligence on Wednesday that alleged Russia ran a sprawling campaign comprising thousands of social media accounts to promote Calin Georgescu across platforms like TikTok and Telegram.

The intelligence files were from the Romanian Intelligence Service, the Foreign Intelligence Service, the Special Telecommunication Service and the Ministry of Internal Affairs.

Despite being a huge outsider who declared zero campaign spending, Georgescu emerged as the frontrunner on Nov. 24. He was due to face reformist Elena Lasconi of the Save Romania Union party in a runoff on Sunday.


A new date will now be set to rerun the first round.

Lasconi strongly condemned the court's decision, saying it was “illegal, immoral, and crushes the very essence of democracy.”

“We should have moved forward with the vote. We should have respected the will of the Romanian people. Whether we like it or not, from a legal and legitimate standpoint, 9 million Romanian citizens, both in the country and the diaspora, expressed their preference for a particular candidate through their votes. We cannot ignore their will!" she said.

"I know I would have won. And I will win because the Romanian people know I will fight for them, that I will unite them for a better Romania. I will defend our democracy. I will not give up.”

She said the issue of Russian interference should have been tackled after the election was completed.

Prime Minister Marcel Ciolacu said in a statement the annulment was “the only correct solution” following the intelligence drop which revealed the “Romanian people’s vote was flagrantly distorted as a result of Russian interference.”

“The presidential elections must be held again,” he said in a post on Facebook. “At the same time, investigations by the authorities must uncover who is responsible for the massive attempt to influence the outcome of the presidential election.”

The same court last week ordered a recount of the first-round votes, which added to the myriad controversies that have engulfed a chaotic election cycle.

Cristian Andrei, a political consultant based in Bucharest, said the court's decision amounts to a “crisis mode situation for the Romanian democracy.”

“In light of the information about the external interference, the massive interference in elections, I think this was not normal but predictable, because it’s not normal times at all, Romania is an uncharted territory,” he told The Associated Press. “The problem is here, do we have the institutions to manage such an interference in the future?”

Thirteen candidates ran in the first round presidential vote in the European Union and NATO member country. The president serves a five-year term and has significant decision-making powers in areas such as national security, foreign policy and judicial appointments.

Georgescu's surprising success left many political observers wondering how most local surveys were so far off, putting him behind at least five other candidates before the vote.

Many observers attributed his success to his TikTok account, which now has 5.8 million likes and 531,000 followers. But some experts suspect Georgescu’s online following was artificially inflated while Romania’s top security body alleged he was given preferential treatment by TikTok over other candidates.

In the intelligence release, the secret services alleged that one TikTok user paid more $381,000 (361,000 euros) to other users to promote Georgescu content. Intelligence authorities said information they obtained “revealed an aggressive promotion campaign” to increase and accelerate his popularity.

Asked by the AP in a interview Wednesday whether he believes the Chinese-owned TikTok poses a threat to democracy, Georgescu said: “The most important existing function for promoting free speech and freedom of expression is social media.”

(AP)



EU demands 'urgent' answers from TikTok about possible foreign interference in Romanian election

Copyright Damian Dovarganes/Copyright 2018 The AP. All rights reserved

By Jorge Liboreiro
Published on 

A series of declassified documents suggest TikTok was exploited by a "state actor" to influence the outcome of Romania's presidential election.

The European Commission has sent TikTok an "urgent" request for information demanding more answers about the platform's increasingly controversial role in the first round of Romania's presidential elections, which saw the sudden victory of Călin Georgescu and fuelled serious concerns of foreign interference.

Georgescu, an independent candidate who has embraced Eurosceptic, Russian-friendly, ultra-nationalist and pseudo-scientific views, will face off Elena Lasconi, a pro-European liberal, in the second round scheduled for this Sunday.

"We are concerned about mounting indications of coordinated foreign online influence operation targeting ongoing Romanian elections, especially on TikTok," said Henna Virkkunen, the Commisison's executive vice-president in charge of digital policy.

The request, released on Friday, is based on the Digital Services Act (DSA) and comes with a deadline of 24 hours. It marks the second request for information sent to TikTok in the context of the Romanian elections after the first one sent last week.

Brussels wants the company to clarify the revelations contained in the intelligence documents that Romanian President Klaus Iohannis declassified on Wednesay, which strongly suggested Georgescu's abrupt rise had not been "a natural outcome" but the result of artificially coordinated action to manipulate and exploit TikTok's algorithm.

The campaign was likely orchestrated by a "state actor," the documents said. Although Russia is not mentioned as the culprit, the agencies detected similarities between an online campaign in Romania and a previous one that Moscow had conducted in Ukraine.

According to the Romanian Intelligence Service (SRI), a previously hidden network, mainly operating on TikTok, which had been largely dormant since its creation in 2016, became very active in the two weeks before the first round of the elections. The network's operators, recruited and coordinated through a channel on the messaging platform Telegram, used methods typical of a state actor's "mode of operation."

The SRI also reported that nearly one million euros were spent in the campaign by an individual supporting Georgescu's candidacy, with up to €950 paid for a repost. TikTok itself admitted to receiving €362,500 from this person last week, the documents showed.

The declassification sent shockwaves through Romania and beyond, stoking fears the Eastern European country had fallen victim to foreign interference.

"TikTok needs to set up resources to counter information operations ahead of the election weekend coming up," a Commission spokesperson said.

TikTok under scrutiny

The request for information follows the "retention order" that Brussels announced on Thursday, which compels TikTok to "freeze and preserve" all internal documents and information, including its system of recommendations and the monetised promotion of political content, related to electoral risks across the bloc.

The order will apply from 24 November 2024 until 31 March 2025 and cover upcoming elections in Romania, Croatia, Austria, Greece and Germany.

The data retained by the order could help the Commission open a formal investigation into TikTok's role in the Romanian race. The probe, which would represent the next stage of the request for information, has not yet been announced.

TikTok did not reply to questions emailed by Euronews.

On Tuesday, representatives of the company faced a grilling in the European Parliament during which they sought to defend TikTok's actions in Romania. The executives said the platform had taken down several networks aimed at meddling in the elections, including one with 1,781 followers that supported Georgescu.

MEPs left the meeting visibly dissatisfied, complaining many of their questions had been unanswered. Valérie Hayer, the leader of Renew Europe, asked for Shou Zi Chew, the CEO of TikTok, to be summoned before the hemicycle.

"What has happened in Romania is another warning bell for us: disinformation can happen all over Europe with very harmful consequences," she wrote.

Hayer said that should Brussels determine TikTok violated the DSA, the EU "should follow with stringent sanctions, without excluding a suspension or a full ban."

TikTok, which is Chinese-owned, has been a recurring target of scrutiny in Western countries over the spread of misinformation and propaganda through its powerful algorithm, which keeps users hooked to an endless stream of recommended content.


‘People want change’: inside Romania’s 

far-right stronghold

ByAFP
December 6, 2024

Businessman Ciprian Gavrila says he hopes far-right presidential hopeful Calin Georgescu will win Sunday's run-off - Copyright AFP Tania LEE


Ani SANDU and Fulya OZERKAN

In the Romanian village of Mihai Viteazu, where far-right presidential candidate Calin Georgescu performed particularly well in the first-round election in which he stormed to a surprise lead, businessman Ciprian Gavrila explained why.

“People are saying ‘Stop’, they want change,” Gavrila said at his bar, diagnosing the mood heading into a run-off Sunday that is being closely watched for a change in political direction in the EU and NATO member, which borders Ukraine.

“The parties in power for so many years have deceived and fooled us,” said the 43-year-old, a member of the extreme-right SOS Romania party, which entered parliament following legislative elections last Sunday.

In Mihai Viteazu, SOS Romania and two other far-right parties combined won nearly 65 percent of the parliamentary vote, the country’s highest score.

Georgescu also got one of his best results in the village of 3,000 people in the first-round vote on November 24, topping the constituency with 45.5 percent of the vote, compared to almost 23 percent nationwide.

Georgescu will face centrist Elena Lasconi in Sunday’s run-off.

Liberal mayor Adrian Costache said Georgescu’s landslide win in his village came as a “surprise” to him.

“People want to see if others are more capable in developing the country”, which ranks among the poorest in the European Union, he told AFP.


– ‘Capable man to lead us’ –


Mihai Filip, a 55-year-old salesman, told AFP he voted for Georgescu after following him on platforms such as TikTok for the past two months.

With his slogan “Romania first” echoing Donald Trump’s, Georgescu produced a wave of viral content on social media around issues such as his call for an end to aid for Ukraine.

Romanian authorities alleged Georgescu was granted “preferential treatment” by TikTok ahead of the first-round vote, with his videos viewed millions of times — an accusation the social network has denied.

“Georgescu cares about the Romanian people first and foremost. He does not care about Russia,” Filip said.

“Everything in our country is expensive, while wages are still low,” he added.

While expressing worries that electing the pro-European small-town mayor Lasconi would usher in pro-LGBTQ policies, it was Georgescu’s “Christian faith” that caught Filip’s attention.

“She will pass a law on marriage between two men, I cannot accept such a thing,” he alleged, adding that Romania was in need of “a capable man to lead us”, not “a woman”.

During her campaign, Lasconi said she was in favour of same-sex civil partnerships, but has never come out in favour of same-sex marriage.

– Protest vote –

Georgescu “taps into a rather conservative and traditional discourse that permeates Romanian society,” political scientist Marius Ghincea told AFP.

He also represents a protest vote for those disillusioned with the establishment, he added.

Russia’s war in neighbouring Ukraine does not appear to be a main concern for the voters in Mihai Viteazu, which is less than 100 kilometres (60 miles) from the border and located in the Constanta region that is home to a NATO air base.

Georgescu, a critic of NATO and a past admirer of Russian leader Vladimir Putin, fervently campaigned for an end to aid for Kyiv, raising fears in Brussels and Washington.

Marian Popa Romel, a construction worker, said he had heard a lot about Georgescu recently, including that “he’s with the Russians, that he’s taking us out of NATO, out of the EU”.

“But I’m still going with him, because he’s a man,” the 56-year-old said.

Daniel Panait, 21, said he would cast his vote for Georgescu, mainly out of discontent with current politicians.

“Nothing has been done in this country, and especially in this village. We have no sewage,” he told AFP.

Bar owner Gavrila, who also runs a car wash, has already made his choice, and hopes for Georgescu to win.

“Why don’t we try to see how this man does?” he said, while glancing at the election coverage on TV.


LEFT WING POPULISM

AOC Becomes First Bluesky User to Reach 1 Million Followers


Bluesky became an alternative to X, formerly known as Twitter, after the 2024 election. (A MONTH AGO)

By Chris Walker
Truthout
December 5, 2024
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez listens to speakers during an event outside Union Station on June 16, 2021, in Washington, D.C.Win McNamee / Getty Images

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a progressive representing parts of the Queens and Bronx boroughs of New York City, became the first user on the social media site Bluesky to reach 1 million followers earlier this week.

Bluesky has been around since the fall of 2021. However, it wasn’t until last month that the site gained popularity as an alternative to X, formerly known as Twitter.

Many users shifted platforms due to their disdain for billionaire Elon Musk, who owns X and was a major supporter of Donald Trump during the 2024 presidential race. After Trump’s win in November, many liberal and left-leaning X users sought different options for social media, citing the fact that X has become overrun with hateful, far right accounts as a result of lax regulation under Musk.

Ocasio-Cortez was among those who started a Bluesky account after Trump’s win. In a post currently pinned to the top of her feed, the New York lawmaker explained why she prefers Bluesky to X.

“A thing I like here is it’s okay to have moments of happiness in public without being broadly scolded, and I believe that sustaining this kind of humanity will be very important as we resist fascism,” Ocasio-Cortez wrote in the post. “We have to sustain each other. Making joy isn’t denial, it’s how we will survive.”

While Ocasio-Cortez’s X account is still popular and somewhat active, it is often the target of ridicule and attacks from right-wing accounts.

In a recent post remarking on her achievement of 1 million followers, Ocasio-Cortez expounded upon why she made the shift.

“People are leaving Twitter because it’s not fun anymore and no one is obligated to be on a platform they don’t enjoy. It’s not rocket science,” she said.

Since the exodus of users from X to Bluesky over the past month, the latter site has amassed more than 24 million new accounts. Some faithful users of X and other commentators have claimed that the new site is nothing more than an echo chamber where liberal and left-leaning users only discuss ideas among themselves — but media journalist Parker Molloy has contested that critique.

“I think that our default view of social media has become one where insults have become the default, where interactions are a form of combat, and there’s an expectation that being online means bracing yourself for hostility at every turn,” Molloy wrote last month. “Bluesky challenges that norm, not by shutting out opposing views, but by creating a space where conversations aren’t immediately derailed by harassment or bad-faith arguments.”

“It’s not about avoiding disagreement — it’s about fostering an environment where disagreements can actually happen productively,” Molloy added.

Ocasio-Cortez made headlines for another reason this week: She’s reportedly mulling a run for the top Democratic spot on the House Oversight Committee, which is tasked with ensuring “the efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability of the federal government and all its agencies.” As the ranking member of the committee, Ocasio-Cortez would be a leading voice against Republicans and the Trump administration in their attempts to use the government to go after their perceived political enemies.

“I’ll be making a decision shortly,” Ocasio-Cortez said.
Tlaib: Congress “Can No Longer Deny” Israeli Genocide After Amnesty Report

Advocates are reigniting calls for an arms embargo on Israel after landmark findings that Israel is committing genocide.
December 5, 2024
Rep. Rashida Tlaib speaks during a news conference calling for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on November 13, 2023.
Mandel Ngan / AFP via Getty Images

Advocates for Palestinian rights have reignited their calls for the U.S. to stop sending arms to Israel following a landmark Amnesty International investigation concluding that Israel is committing genocide, as many Palestinians and experts have been saying for months.

“My colleagues can no longer deny that this is genocide,” said Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Michigan). “We must follow our own U.S. laws. We need an Arms Embargo now.”

On Thursday, Amnesty released a sprawling report determining that Israel’s assault of Gaza amounts to genocide, citing Israel’s relentless attacks, blocking of humanitarian aid, targeting of health and other basic infrastructure, forced displacement of 90 percent of Gaza’s population, and more.

Amnesty is the first major international humanitarian organization to outright label Israel’s actions as a genocide. The group was also one of the first major human rights organizations to label Israel’s violent occupation and oppression of Palestine as apartheid, back in 2022.

The human rights group, one of the largest in the world, specifically called out the U.S. as a major collaborator in the genocide due to the Biden administration’s policy of sending Israel weapons with zero red lines. Just last week, despite Israel’s clear, ongoing campaign of ethnic cleansing in northern Gaza, reports emerged of the Biden administration advancing yet another sale of weapons to Israel worth $680 million.

Related Stor
y
Amnesty International Finds Israel Is Committing Genocide in Bombshell Report
“Genocidal intent has been part and parcel of Israel’s conduct in Gaza since 7 October 2023,” the report says.
By Sharon Zhang , TruthoutDecember 5, 2024


Amnesty warned that states continuing to send weapons are risking legal complicity in genocide.

Amnesty also called on UN bodies like the Security Council and the General Assembly to take immediate action to implement a permanent ceasefire and a “comprehensive arms embargo” on Israel.

“We welcome the fact that an internationally-respected organization like Amnesty International would clearly state what has become obvious to the entire world — with the exception of Biden administration officials,” said Nihad Awad, the executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), in a statement.

“Based on the conclusion of this report and on countless similar reports documenting Israel’s genocide, we demand that President Biden order an immediate ban on weapons deliveries to the genocidal Israeli government,” Awad went on.

In the past 14 months, Israeli forces have killed at least 44,500 Palestinians in Gaza, including 17,500 children, and injured at least 105,000, according to official counts by Gaza health officials. As Amnesty and international experts have acknowledged, the death toll is likely far higher, with some estimates ranging as high as 330,000, out of a pre-genocide population of 2.3 million.

UN Special Rapporteur for the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese warned in September that Israel “could end up exterminating almost the entire population in Gaza” within the next two years if international powers do not intervene to stop it.

The leadership committee for the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement lauded the report. “We now call on Amnesty International members and sections to step up their pressure on complicit states, corporations and institutions to end their complicity with Israel’s regime of settler-colonialism, military occupation, apartheid and genocide,” the BDS National Committee said in a statement.


“Stopping Israel’s genocide demands mounting enormous pressure on governments to impose meaningful sanctions on Israel, starting with a comprehensive military-security embargo, as was done against apartheid South Africa,” the group continued.


Amnesty International Finds Israel Is Committing Genocide in Bombshell Report

“Genocidal intent has been part and parcel of Israel’s conduct in Gaza since 7 October 2023,” the report says.
December 5, 2024
Palestinians walk in a devastated neighborhood due to Israeli strikes in the southern Gaza Strip city of Khan Yunis on December 2, 2024.
Bashar Taleb / AFP via Getty Images


Honest, paywall-free news is rare. Please support our boldly independent journalism with a donation of any size.

One of the world’s most prominent human rights groups concluded that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza in a bombshell report released Thursday.

In a 296-page investigation, Amnesty International found that the breadth of Israel’s military assault on Gaza — including mass civilian killings, forced displacement, the blocking of humanitarian aid, and many other alleged violations of the Genocide Convention — combined with Israeli officials’ clear intent to destroy Gaza means that their campaign amounts to genocide.

Amnesty is the first major international human rights organization to formally label Israel’s assault a genocide. Numerous UN agencies and groups have also found evidence that Israel is committing genocide.

The sprawling report details some of the most inhumane parts of Israel’s assault and invasion up until the end of November, highlighting the “unprecedented magnitude” of Israel’s military incursions and starvation campaign, as well as dozens of statements by Israeli officials and soldiers indicating their intent to wipe out Gaza.

The report cites numerous Israeli massacres investigated by Amnesty that targeted civilian structures in densely populated areas, including 15 attacks between October 2023 and April 2024 that killed 334 people, 141 of whom were children. It also points to statements by Israeli officials, like when President Isaac Herzog claimed that there were no Palestinian civilians who were “not involved” in the attack on October 7, 2023.

Related Stor

UN Report: Israel’s Tactics in Gaza Are “Consistent With Genocide”
Israel’s “unprecedented destruction” has deprived Palestinians of all conditions of life, the group found. By Sharon Zhang , TruthoutNovember 14, 2024

The human rights group found Israel guilty of three of five acts prohibited in the Genocide Convention, including killing members of the group, causing physical or mental harm to members of the group, and deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about the group’s physical destruction.

Further, as Amnesty argues, the Genocide Convention specifies that in order for an assault to be classified as genocide, it must have an “intent to destroy” a group. The group says that, while Israel claims its attacks have only targeted Hamas, Amnesty found that “these claims are not credible,” as Israel has consistently ignored its obligations to avoid civilian harm and has thus committed indiscriminate or disproportionate attacks.

“The evidence presented in the report clearly shows that the destruction of Palestinians in Gaza, as such, was Israel’s intent, either in addition to, or as a means to achieve, its military aims,” the report says. “There is only one reasonable inference that can be drawn from the evidence presented: genocidal intent has been part and parcel of Israel’s conduct in Gaza since 7 October 2023, including its military campaign.”

The group calls on international powers to stop sending arms to Israel or else risk complicity in genocide, specifically calling out key arms suppliers like the U.S. and Germany.

“Month after month, Israel has treated Palestinians in Gaza as a subhuman group unworthy of human rights and dignity, demonstrating its intent to physically destroy them,” said Amnesty International Secretary General Agnès Callamard.

“Our damning findings must serve as a wake-up call to the international community: this is genocide. It must stop now. States that continue to transfer arms to Israel at this time must know they are violating their obligation to prevent genocide and are at risk of becoming complicit in genocide,” Callamard said.

Amnesty also called on the International Criminal Court to add genocide to the recently issued arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.

“No one should be allowed to commit genocide and remain unpunished,” said Callamard.

Amnesty International report says Israel is committing genocide in Gaza

Amnesty International accused the state of Israel of committing genocide against Palestinians in the Gaza war in a report published on Thursday, an allegation Israeli leaders have repeatedly denied. The report says Israel has "unleashed hell and destruction on Palestinians in Gaza brazenly, continuously and with total impunity".


Issued on: 05/12/2024 -
By: NEWS WIRES

01:47
Mohammad Shouman carries the body of his daughter, Masa, who was killed in an Israeli bombardment of the Gaza Strip, during her funeral in Rafah on January 17, 2024. 
© Fatima Shbair, AP


Amnesty International on Thursday accused Israel of "committing genocide" against Palestinians in Gaza since the start of the war last year, saying its new report was a "wake-up call" for the international community.

The London-based rights organisation said its findings were based on "dehumanising and genocidal statements by Israeli government and military officials", satellite images documenting devastation, fieldwork and ground reports from Gazans.

"Month after month, Israel has treated Palestinians in Gaza as a subhuman group unworthy of human rights and dignity, demonstrating its intent to physically destroy them," Amnesty chief Agnes Callamard said in a statement.

"Our damning findings must serve as a wake-up call to the international community: this is genocide. It must stop now," she added.

The Palestinian group Hamas launched an unprecedented attack inside southern Israel on October 7, 2023, triggering a deadly Israeli military offensive on Gaza as Israeli officials vowed to crush the militant group.

A total of 1,208 people in southern Israel, mostly civilians, were killed during the Hamas attack, according to an AFP tally based on official data.

Since then at least 44,532 people have been killed in Gaza, mostly civilians, according to the Hamas-run health ministry, deemed reliable by the UN.

"There is absolutely no doubt that Israel has military objectives. But the existence of military objectives does not negate the possibility of a genocidal intent," Callamard told AFP at a press conference in The Hague.

She said the organisation had based its findings on the criteria set out in the UN Convention on the Prevention of Genocide.

Israel has repeatedly and forcefully denied allegations of genocide, accusing Hamas of using civilians as human shields.

But Amnesty's 300-page report points to "direct deliberate attacks on civilian and civilian infrastructures where there was no Hamas presence or any other military objectives, the use of heavy explosive weapons with a wide radius of destruction in densely populated residential areas," the blocking of aid deliveries, and the displacement of 90 percent of Gaza's 2.4 million people.

'Erasure'

In the days after the October 7 attack, Israel imposed a "total siege" on Gaza, with the slogan: "No electricity, no water, no gas". Limited supplies have been allowed in since then.

Palestinians have been subjected to "malnutrition, hunger and diseases" and exposed to a "slow, calculated death", Amnesty said.

The rights group, which is also due to publish a report on the crimes committed by Hamas, cited 15 air strikes in Gaza between October 7, 2023 and April 20, which killed 334 civilians, including 141 children, for which the group found "no evidence that any of these strikes were directed at a military objective".

The Amnesty report also referenced dozens of calls by Israeli officials and soldiers for the annihilation, destruction, burning or "erasure" of Gaza.

Such statements highlighted "not only systemic impunity but also the creation of an environment that emboldens...such behaviour."

"Governments must stop pretending that they are powerless to terminate Israel's occupation, to end apartheid and to stop the genocide in Gaza," said Callamard.

"States that transfer arms to Israel violate their obligations to prevent genocide under the convention and are at risk of becoming complicit," she added.

(AFP)



Academic Labor Unions Are Key to Fighting Trump’s Repressive Higher Ed Agenda

AAUP President Todd Wolfson says unions like his are key to fighting Trump’s attacks on the bedrock of democracy.
December 5, 2024

Three unions representing roughly 9,000 staff and faculty workers went on strike at Rutgers University in April 2023.Kyle Handojo

Two days after Donald Trump’s victory in the U.S. presidential election, Todd Wolfson, the newly installed president of the 109-year-old American Association of University Professors, (AAUP) issued a statement committing the organization to the ongoing defense of academic freedom and shared governance.

“While the results of this presidential election are disappointing,” he wrote on the AAUP website, “we remain steadfast in our commitment to our principles and ensuring that future generations of Americans are afforded the opportunity that higher education provides.”

Among the most pressing concerns, he wrote, are the decline in public funding for higher education, ballooning student debt, and attacks on the freedom to teach and learn.

“Without a thriving, inclusive higher education system that serves the public good, the majority of Americans will be excluded from meaningful participation in our democracy and this country will move backward,” Wolfson predicted. “We will do everything in our power to protect our institutions, faculty, staff and students and stand up against those seeking to violate academic freedom and the core principle of higher education.”

It’s a daunting challenge.

According to the National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education and the Professions, as of January 2024, slightly more than 400,000 faculty, 27 percent of the total, were union members. But Wolfson, a seasoned academic activist, is not cowed by the enormity of organizing the unorganized 73 percent. His experience tells him that activating them is possible.

As president of one of three unions that waged a successful strike at Rutgers University in 2023, Wolfson knows how to build power, work in coalition, and stoke sustained rank-and-file involvement. He also understands that growing the AAUP’s membership, training new members, and analyzing and then opposing legislation to limit freedom of speech, freedom to teach and freedom to organize will require a multitiered strategy.

In this exclusive interview for Truthout, Wolfson speaks to reporter Eleanor J. Bader about the AAUP’s agenda for 2025 and his vision for the future of academic labor.

Eleanor J. Bader: Let’s start with organizing. How does the AAUP plan to grow the union and bring in new members?

Todd Wolfson: We’re working to build member density, getting folks on every campus organized and trained. We did an organizer training in mid-November. Three hundred people from 70 campus chapters spent 12 hours using Skills to Win, a series of materials developed by the late union organizer/activist, Jane McAlevey. Part of the training is skill building: How to conduct one-on-one conversations; how to identify potential leaders; how to chair a meeting; and how to build and grow a vibrant union chapter. The other part of the training includes a discussion of the political economy to deepen everyone’s understanding of disinvestment in higher education and the rampant fascist attacks against colleges and universities. Our campaign is called Organize Every Campus. We have to do this because threats are looming at the national level and on multiple campuses.


We know what we are fighting for — fully funded higher education — and know that higher education is the lifeblood of any democracy.

Tell me about the differing attacks on campuses throughout the country.

There are so many. The University of Connecticut has announced plans to cut many majors and impose massive budget cuts. The University of North Texas has perused syllabi and is forcing faculty to change what is being taught in Gender Studies and African studies courses. At Muhlenberg College, tenured anthropology professor Maura Finkelstein was dismissed after she expressed support for the Palestinian people and criticized Israel’s genocidal policies. At Rutgers, adjunct writing instructors have been let go and at Portland State University in Oregon, nearly 100 layoffs have been announced. I want to stress that all of these attacks began before Trump took office.

It sounds like a huge organizing job to fight these proposed cuts.

For sure. The AAUP needs to figure out how to fight back on each campus while simultaneously working to understand how what’s happening fits into the national struggle to defend and protect higher education. One of my mentors is Willie Baptist, who now works at the Kairos Center. Willie taught me that organizers need, first, to be committed to the work. This requires political clarity. On campuses, it means understanding the threat fascism poses to higher education. It also requires an understanding of the university as an economic entity. Skill competency, including the ability to build community, is also key. Basically, we have to be able to foster healthy relationships and encourage and inspire others.

The Rutgers Adjunct Faculty Union, AAUP-AFT and AAUP-BHSNJ strike at Rutgers University, calling for living wages and equal pay.Kyle Handojo

Since 1980, when the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued its decision in NLRB v. Yeshiva University, full-time faculty at private colleges and universities have been classified as managerial employees and excluded from NLRB protections. That obviously impedes the AAUP’s ability to recruit new members at private institutions. Is there any way around this?

The AAUP has about 45,000 members. Most, 35,000, are part of bargaining units but 10,000 are in what we call Advocacy Chapters. These Chapters do not have bargaining rights and are largely based in private colleges or universities or are located in states where public workers do not have the right to bargain collectively. Most of them are in the South or Southwest.

Although Advocacy Chapters are prohibited from bargaining over wages and benefits, they are not powerless. At the University of Pennsylvania, for example, the Advocacy Chapter has grown and members are organizing around the university’s parental leave policy. Penn is also Ground Zero in the fight to protect pro-Palestinian speech.

But I also want to note that many large public universities are not organized. Penn State, the largest public university in Pennsylvania, has not unionized. Ohio State and the University of Michigan are also unorganized, so we have a lot of work to do to bring every public university into the AAUP or other education unions.

You were a professor at Rutgers and led one of the unions that waged a successful strike there last April. Workers won significant raises for graduate students, postdocs, and others. The union also successfully pushed back against longstanding state disinvestment from public higher ed. Are the lessons from this strike transferable to other schools?

Rutgers has 30,000 employees in 20 different bargaining units, including two police unions. There are 70,000 students. We started organizing during the pandemic. I was the president of one of the unions when the campus shut down and we organized to demand that Rutgers — as a public university — serve the public good. We demanded that they retain staff and adjunct faculty since layoffs would have ended their health care coverage during a global health crisis. We won. That built unity. Later, when our contract came up, we were able to bring three unions representing 9000 workers together to shut down the university. This is why a wall-to-wall union, uniting all workers regardless of job title, makes sense. Management typically works to divide workers during negotiations so the more unity you can build, the less effective divide-and-conquer tactics are.

Does the AAUP collaborate with other education unions?

This really is a new day. In September, all of the unions with members working in higher education — the AAUP, the AFT, NEA, SEIU, AFSCME, UNITE HERE, Higher Education Labor United (HELU) — came together and aligned our vision for the future. This had never happened before. The AAUP and HELU were the only groups composed solely of educators but every one of these unions is fully committed to defending higher education from attacks by the right. We see each other as partners. Along with noneducational allies like the ACLU, we are strategizing about protecting our members and fighting back against attacks against us.


The AAUP is here to remind people that higher ed is the bedrock of democracy.

We’re also partnering with Bargaining for the Common Good to build coalitions with community groups. The Chicago Teachers Union and the unions at Rutgers are models of community-academic partnership and have pushed for housing and mental health support. We’ve learned from them.

In August 2024, the AAUP announced that it will no longer categorically oppose academic boycotts. The shift recognized that boycotts “can instead be legitimate tactical responses to conditions that are fundamentally incompatible with the mission of higher education.” Some AAUP members have pushed back against this decision and the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, an organization funded by the right-wing Donors Trust and Koch Foundation, has put the AAUP in its crosshairs. Is this a concern?

Making enemies is part of the job. My work, and the work of others in the AAUP, is to reiterate a set of principles about how and why higher education matters. The right wing and the Republicans operate as an echo chamber and efforts to dehumanize us are part of that. We know what we are fighting for — fully funded higher education — and know that higher education is the lifeblood of any democracy, a way to ensure that people have the critical thinking skills to understand the world. Whether the right attacks us for teaching about race, gender or the atrocities happening in Gaza, we’re protecting free speech. Nothing we’re doing is radical. It’s simply the foundation of a healthy democracy. So even when the right takes cheap shots at us, we are not diverted but are instead even more resolute about building worker power and defending our campuses.

At the same time, I know that people have strong feelings about what we’re doing. Gaza is one example. Nonetheless, I believe we can talk our way through our differences.

What do you consider the biggest challenges facing the AAUP under the Trump administration?

I worry that the administration will try to expand the definition of antisemitism to include any criticism of Israel and will threaten colleges with the loss of federal funding using Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VI prohibits discrimination based on race, color, or national origin in all programs and activities that receive federal money.

This is a big, serious threat. Criticism of Israel is not the same as criticism of the Jewish people but I am concerned about the safety of students, faculty and staff who speak out about Gaza or the human tragedies unfolding there. I actually think many college presidents will stand with us on this and will see this threat as an attack on academic integrity.

The Rutgers University strike began on April 10, 2023, and resulted in an agreement that included across-the-board salary increases.Alan Maass

What are your immediate goals once Trump and Vance take office?

We have to take it one step at a time. First, we have to figure out how to defend each campus. We can’t allow people to become complacent about repression or attacks on speech. We need to get our message about the value of higher education out. We need everyone — engineers, physicists, sociologists, poets — to talk about why higher education matters. This is the only way we can counter the messaging of the right. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and others on the right continually devalue higher ed. People need to hear counternarratives.

We also need to fully deconstruct Project 2025 to see the specifics of the attacks and address them. We already see that the right is trying to weaponize Title VI and weaken the accreditation process to make it easier to cut funding for programs that they oppose.

Look, the political situation is scary right now. It’s dire. But there is also a silver lining. The first time Trump was in office people flocked to progressive organizations and got involved in social justice efforts. I expect this to happen again.

Any final thoughts?

This is not a moment to shrink or back off. It’s a moment to grow and build power. We in the AAUP are ready to fight for what we need — fully funded higher education, an end to student debt, and respect for every worker on every campus. This is just one moment in a long struggle. The AAUP is here to remind people that higher ed is the bedrock of democracy.This article is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), and you are free to share and republish under the terms of the license.




Eleanor J. Bader is an award-winning journalist who writes about domestic social issues, movements for social change, books and art. In addition to Truthout, she writes for The Progressive, Lilith Magazine and blog, the LA Review of Books, Rain Taxi, The Indypendent and other online and print publications.
US Supreme Court Case on Trans Health Shows How Gender Essentialism Harms Us All


Everyone who cares about bodily autonomy should fight for trans health care.

December 6, 2024
Supporters of trans rights and their opponents rally outside of the U.S. Supreme Court as the high court hears arguments in a case on trans health care bans, on December 4, 2024, in Washington, D.C.Kevin Dietsch / Getty Images

When I had my first gender-affirming medical intervention, I was 21 years old. The year was 2005, and at that time, the idea of a trans surgery being covered by health insurers was outlandish.

So, I saved up money starting at age 18, and visited psychologists at the free gender clinic in the San Francisco Bay Area where I lived. I told them I had been “living as a man full time” and pretended to fit the clinical definition of gender dysphoria in order to get a letter allowing the surgeon to work on me. (I was genderqueer and nonbinary, had a high voice and feminine features and had virtually never “passed” as a man.)

I knew deeply and with utter certainty that having a double mastectomy would improve my self-image and help me live in an expression closer to who I am. So I jumped through all of their hoops, including the surgeon himself at the consult taking one look at me and asking if I was really sure about this.

I lay in a hotel bed in Plano, Texas, afterward, as happy as I have ever been. My dad, whose warm supportiveness was rare among parents of trans children at that time, visited me and took me out to the Cheesecake Factory while I delighted in my next body. It was easier for me than most people: I had family support, the ability to travel and pay out of pocket for treatment, and I was transitioning in a direction that afforded me more privilege over time as I became more masculine in appearance.

Years later, when I started hormone treatments, I was thrilled to find how much the medical community had advanced on trans issues, taking an “informed consent” approach with hormones rather than requiring me to pass an unpassable gender test. But of course, these gender tests are not required for cisgender people who want breast reductions, breast augmentations, plastic surgeries or gender-affirming hormone treatments, so long as these align with some societal caricature of their assigned sex at birth.

Related Story

Right-Wing Justices Had to Help Anti-Trans Lawyer During SCOTUS Hearing
The justices seemed to embrace arguments for maintaining Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming care for trans youth. By Chris Walker , Truthout  December 4, 2024


When I had top surgery back in 2005, people told me I was mutilating myself, that I was too young to decide, and that my decisions didn’t make sense to them. Now, I am one of thousands who can attest that accessing this care was life-saving and deeply affirming of my being.

My concern today is that trans people should not have to attest to this — because the “debate” over trans health care presented to the Supreme Court this week in U.S. v. Skrmetti will impact all of us, not just trans people.

At its core, this Supreme Court case is about the government’s control over gendered bodies. The case challenges a Tennessee law that bans trans youth from accessing gender-affirming care. But the proliferation of state laws attacking trans health care access shows that trans liberation movements have threatened a central ideological tenet of the Christian right and conservatism — gender essentialism.


Legalizing the denial of bodily self-determination increases patriarchal control over all people deemed socially transgressive.

The belief that gender identity is an innate biological category determined by our sex at birth is not a medical fact but a product of 18th- and 19th-century Western patriarchal thought — it is deeply entwined with the belief that “woman” is both an essential category and an inferior one. This essentialist belief system showed its weakness from the start, as it has long been forcibly imposed on unwilling communities via police and the military — through everything from sex-segregated spaces, to sexist rules applying only to women, to laws against cross-dressing and policing of gay and trans gathering spaces.

If gender were in fact essential and naturally aligned with sex at birth, why would it need to be policed at all?

In recent decades, even Western medicine has been questioning gender essentialism, prompted in part by activism from intersex and transgender communities. As many non-Western cultures have long acknowledged, a significant minority of people are born or grow up with ambiguous sex characteristics (chromosomes, hormones and secondary sex characteristics) and an even larger group of people do not grow up to identify with their sex assigned at birth. Intersex and transgender people’s existence shows that sex and gender are mutable and exist on a spectrum, and a vast majority of young trans people who receive affirming care attest that they are happy with the outcome.

In a desperate attempt to keep patriarchal gendered social systems from falling apart, conservative forces are now targeting these happy trans youth. They claim that young people are endangered by gender-affirming health care, even as they allow nonconsensual surgeries and hormone treatments forced on intersex children to continue unabated. The Tennessee argument in the Supreme Court quite openly holds that trans youth should be restricted from choosing health care that cisgender youth are freely permitted. The danger is not the hormone treatments — it is who is taking them, and how that upsets the status quo.

The argument presented by Chase Strangio of the ACLU and U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar asks simply that the Tennessee law be held to a certain level of scrutiny because it differentiates on the basis of sex. And yet the Supreme Court seems poised to reject that argument, with the court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson — which repealed Roe v. Wade and allowed states to ban abortion — serving as precedent for further restrictions of bodily autonomy.

Tennessee Solicitor General Jonathan Skrmetti made the connection explicit in his brief, asking the court to expand Dobbs to allow gender-affirming care bans at the state level. As Strangio told Slate, “whether you look at the equality thread or the autonomy thread in Dobbs, this is about structural efforts to impede people’s abilities to make decisions for themselves.”

Underlying both of these cases is an effort to curtail self-determination, particularly for cis and trans women, trans people in general, and low-income people (who are the most immediately impacted by all health restrictions, because they cannot afford to simply travel or move for care).

Legalizing the denial of bodily self-determination increases patriarchal control over all people deemed socially transgressive — in these cases, literally forcing poor people to carry pregnancies to term and give birth against their will, and to live in bodies and gender expressions that actively harm their mental and physical health.

The spectacle we are witnessing is not actually a debate about whether or not trans youth should be able to access hormones. These state leaderships do not care about protecting trans youth. They care about limiting and controlling gender transgression, protecting an antiquated medical definition of gender, and enforcing patriarchy as a biological claim on reality. Criminalizing trans care is a slippery slope, alongside criminalizing abortion, that we must oppose in a united front fighting for the health and safety of all.


This article is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), and you are free to share and republish under the terms of the license.


Lewis Raven Wallace
Lewis Raven Wallace (he/they/ze) is an independent journalist based in Durham, North Carolina, and the author and creator of The View from Somewhere book and podcast. He’s currently a Ford Global Fellow, and the Abolition Journalism Fellow with Interrupting Criminalization. He previously worked in public radio, and is a long-time activist engaged in prison abolition, racial justice, and queer and trans liberation. He is white and transgender, and was born and raised in the Midwest with deep roots in the South.
Bitcoin Hits New High as Crypto-Friendly Atkins Tapped to Lead SEC

"If Atkins is confirmed by the Senate, crypto grifters will surely rejoice at their newfound freedom to swindle, but most investors in the U.S. will be much less safe," wrote one researcher.


Eloise Goldsmith
Dec 05, 2024
COMMON DREAMS

The price of a single Bitcoin topped $100,000 Wednesday—a major milestone for the cryptocurrency—mere hours after President-elect Donald Trump selected crypto advocate Paul Atkins to lead the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Atkins previously served as the SEC commissioner from 2002 to 2008 and then went on to found a financial consulting company, Patomak Global Partners, which included failed cryptocurrency exchange FTX among its clients, according to The Wall Street Journal. Atkins is expected to adopt a warmer approach to crypto.

On a podcast last year, Atkins noted that "if the SEC were more accommodating and would deal straightforwardly with these various [crypto] firms, I think it would be a lot better to have things happen here in the United States rather than outside," according to The Washington Post.

"[Atkins] believes in the promise of robust, innovative capital markets that are responsive to the needs of Investors, and that provide capital to make our Economy the best in the world. He also recognizes that digital assets and other innovations are crucial to Making America Greater than Ever Before," wrote Trump on Truth Social when announcing the pick.

Trump on Thursday claimed credit for Bitcoin reaching new heights: "CONGRATULATIONS BITCOINERS!!! $100,000!!! YOU'RE WELCOME!!! Together, we will Make America Great Again!"

Crypto leaders cheered the Atkins news.

"Paul Akins is an excellent choice for the new SEC chair!" wrote Brian Armstrong, the co-founder and CEO of the cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase. Brad Garlinghouse, CEO of the cryptocurrency firm Ripple, called Atkins an "outstanding choice."

Current SEC Chair Gary Gensler has pursued legal action against a number of crypto companies, including FTX, and drawn the ire of the crypto world for maintaining that by and large the crypto industry should be governed by the same SEC rules that oversee stock and bond trading.

Meanwhile, critics of the Atkins pick warned that investors could be less safe if he is confirmed to helm of the SEC.

"Donald Trump's nomination of Paul Atkins to chair the Securities and Exchange Commission is a huge gift to the crypto industry, as evidenced by the immediate jump in Bitcoin's stock price... If Atkins is confirmed by the Senate, crypto grifters will surely rejoice at their newfound freedom to swindle, but most investors in the U.S. will be much less safe," wrote Kenny Stancil, senior researcher at Revolving Door Project, a watchdog group.

Bartlett Naylor, financial policy advocate for Public Citizen, added that "any sentient being—let alone a securities markets expert—should understand that bitcoin is 'thin air,' as Trump himself once put it. That Paul Atkins has made a living promoting such a scam doesn't bode well for his reflexes as a shepherd for investor protection."