Thursday, January 09, 2025

Indonesia upholds iPhone 16 sales ban after Apple offers $1 bn investment


By AFP
January 8, 2025


Vendors wait for customers at a mobile phone shopping centre in Jakarta
 - Copyright AFP BAY ISMOYO

Indonesia on Wednesday upheld a ban on iPhone 16 sales despite Apple’s $1 billion pledge to invest in the country after a negotiation deadlock, citing the company’s failure to meet domestic market requirements.

Indonesia in October prohibited the marketing and sale of the iPhone 16 model over Apple’s failure to meet local investment regulations requiring that 40 percent of phones be made from local parts as the country seeks to boost investments from giant tech companies.

Investment Minister Rosan Roeslani told reporters on Tuesday that Apple was fully committed to invest $1 billion to build an AirTag factory on Batam island, which was expected to supply 65 percent of the global supply.

It was unclear if the deal on the factory in the industrial zone had been signed.

“AirTag is an accessory, not a component or part of gadgets,” Industry Minister Agus Gumiwang Kartasasmita told a press briefing on Wednesday, referring to the Apple tracking device.

“Until this afternoon, the ministry doesn’t have any reason to issue the domestic component level certificate for Apple products, especially iPhone 16,” he said.

Agus met with Apple representatives on Tuesday, but he said a deal had not been reached.

He said Indonesian officials gave Apple a counterproposal and the giant phone maker did not give an immediate answer.

“If Apple wants to sell iPhone 16 as soon as possible, the ball is in their hand, please respond to our counterproposal immediately,” he said.

Apple previously offered to increase its investments in Indonesia by $100 million to lift the iPhone 16 sales ban, but the Indonesian government refused the proposal in November.

Despite the sales ban, the government allows iPhone 16s to be carried into Indonesia if they are not being traded commercially.

The government estimates about 9,000 units of the new model have entered the country that way.

Indonesia also banned the sale of Google Pixel phones for failing to meet the 40 percent parts requirement.

About 22,000 Google Pixel phones entered the country last year despite the ban.
FacebookTwitterLinkedInEmailShare
Bangladesh garment industry rebounds, but workers say little change


By AFP
January 8, 2025

Bangladesh's clothing manufacturing industry was crippled by a revolution that toppled the government last year - Copyright AFP/File Munir UZ ZAMAN
Sheikh Sabiha ALAM

In a vast Bangladeshi factory hall thrumming with sewing machines, garment workers churn out seemingly endless pairs of mountain hiking trousers for customers in Europe and North America.

Bangladesh’s key clothing manufacturing industry supplying global brands was crippled by a revolution that toppled the government last year, in which garment sector protesters played an important role.

While owners say business has bounced back, frustrated workers say hard-won concessions have done little to change their circumstances, and life remains as hard as ever.

“It is the same kind of exploitation,” said garment worker Khatun, 24, asking that only her first name be used as speaking out would jeopardise her job.

Production in the world’s second-largest garment manufacturer was repeatedly stalled by the months-long violence, before protesters forced long-time autocrat Sheikh Hasina to flee in August.

An interim government, led by Nobel Peace Prize winner Muhammad Yunus, took over.

Protests, however, continued in a string of garment factories for better conditions and more pay, with the Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA) warning in October of $400 million in losses.

Scores of factories closed and tens of thousands lost their jobs.

But after a five percent wage hike was agreed in September, the industry rebounded.



– ‘Operating at full swing’ –




“We are doing well,” said garment producer factory owner S.M. Khaled, who heads the Snowtex company, employing 22,000 workers.

The South Asian nation produces garments for global brands — ranging from France’s Carrefour, Canada’s Tire, Japan’s Uniqlo, Ireland’s Primark, Sweden’s H&M and Spain’s Zara.

The apparel industry accounts for about 80 percent of Bangladesh’s exports, earning $36 billion last year, dropping little despite the unrest from the $38 billion exported the previous year.

“I am working with at least 15 international brands, and our products will be available in 50 countries,” Khaled said.

“Almost all garment factories are operating at full swing after waves of unrest. We are on the growth side.”

Despite challenges with a cooling of demand, Anwar Hossain, the government-appointed administrator of BGMEA, said the industry was returning to strength.

“The largest contributor to exports was the apparel sector,” Hossain said.

The garment industry recorded a 13 percent increase from July-December 2024 — the period after the revolution — compared to the same period the year before, he said.



– ‘Half my basic wage’



Workers tell a different story.

Khatun welcomed the wage rise but said factory managers then hiked already onerous demands for “nearly unachievable production targets”.

Scraping by in the capital Dhaka’s gritty industrial suburb of Ashulia, she earns $140 a month including overtime and benefits to support a family of four.

The wage increase of $8.25 a month seems a miserly addition.

Opening her fist, she showed a 500-taka note, just over four dollars, all she had left after paying rent and other expenses.

“We have good facilities inside the factory, like toilets, a canteen, and water fountains,” she said. “But we don’t get even a 10-minute break while trying to meet the targets”.

Many factory owners were close to the former ruling party.

In the immediate days after Hasina was toppled, several factories were damaged in retaliatory attacks.

Some owners were arrested and accused of supporting Hasina, who is herself in exile in India skipping an arrest warrant for “massacres, killings, and crimes against humanity”.

Most factories are now back in operation, but employees say some offer conditions far worse than before.

“We weren’t receiving salaries on time after the owner was arrested,” said worker Rana, also asking not to be identified.

“Now, they’ve offered me half my basic wage, around $60 to $70. I have a six-month-old child, a wife, and elderly parents to support”, he added.

Hussain, who lost his job in the unrest, tells a common tale.

While he has since found work packing clothes, the new job means he “doesn’t benefit from the increment” deal, while living costs have risen.

“House rents have shot up with the news of the pay rise,” he said.



– ‘Take more responsibility’ –



Taslima Akhter, from the Bangladesh Garment Workers’ Solidarity (BGWS) group, a labour rights organisation, said that “workers are struggling to maintain a minimum standard of living”.

Akhter said factory bosses must push back against global purchasers wanting to maximise profits at the expense of a living wage.

“Garment (factory) owners need to take more responsibility and learn to negotiate better with international buyers,” she said.

“This industry is not new, and problems are not impossible to solve.”

Despite the industry’s apparent fiscal success, Abdullah Hil Raquib, a former BGMEA director, warned it was on fragile ground.

“The stability in the garment sector we see now is only on the surface,” he said.

 Spanish PM says Musk ‘stirs up hatred’, warns against fascism



By AFP
January 8, 2025


Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has announced around 100 events this year to mark the half-century since Spain initiated its democratic transition following Francisco Franco's death in 1975 - Copyright AFP/File ANGELA WEISS

Alfons LUNA

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez warned Wednesday that fascism could return as X owner Elon Musk, an ally of US President-elect Donald Trump, “openly attacks our institutions” and “stirs up hatred”.

Musk, who is set for a role in Trump’s administration, has provoked fury across Europe with a string of attacks on the continent’s leaders, including German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

During a speech for the start of official commemorations on the 50th anniversary of dictator Francisco Franco’s death, Sanchez accused Musk of heading an “international reactionary” movement that “openly attacks our institutions, stirs up hatred and openly calls for the support of the heirs of Nazism in Germany’s upcoming elections”.

“All this is a problem, a challenge, a challenge that should challenge all of us who believe in democracy,” the Socialist premier added at the event at Madrid’s Reina Sofia art museum, home to Pablo Picasso’s “Guernica” painting, one of the most famous anti-Franco works.

“Autocratic regimes are advancing halfway around the world,” Sanchez said, warning that “the fascism we thought we had left behind is now the third political force in Europe”, a reference to far-right parties that have gained ground across the continent.

Musk has offered strong support to the extreme-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) ahead of snap elections in the country on February 23, and will host a discussion on X with the party’s leader Alice Weidel on Thursday.

The billionaire has also called for Starmer to be removed and urged the release from jail of Tommy Robinson, one of Britain’s most prominent far-right agitators.

French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot earlier on Wednesday urged the European Commission to protect its member states with “the greatest firmness” against interference in political debate by Musk, telling France Inter radio: “We have to wake up.”

– Opportunistic ploy? –

Sanchez has announced around 100 events in schools, universities, museums and the streets this year to “showcase the great transformation achieved” in the half-century since Spain initiated its democratic transition following Franco’s death in November 1975.

The general overthrew a democratic republic in a brutal civil war that killed hundreds of thousands and ruled with an iron fist with the backing of fascist forces from 1939 until his death from natural causes aged 82.

Spain’s main opposition conservative Popular Party (PP) believes the initiative is an opportunistic ploy by the minority leftist government to distract attention from its political and legal woes.

Corruption investigations are ongoing against Sanchez’s wife and political allies, while the Socialists have to negotiate painstakingly with an array of fringe and separatist parties to pass legislation.

But the Socialists have retorted by pointing to the origins of the PP, born in 1989 as the successor to the Popular Alliance, founded in 1976 by a former Franco minister.

– ‘Dark years’ –

Sanchez recalled the “ironclad censorship” that existed during the Franco dictatorship and other restrictions such as a ban on divorce and limits on the use of the regional Basque and Catalan languages.

“You don’t have to be of a particular ideology, left, centre or right, to look with sadness, with great sadness and also with terror, at the dark years of Franco’s regime and fear that this regression will be repeated,” he said.

“Forgetting the mistakes of the past is the first step towards repeating them again,” he added.

Neither King Felipe VI nor PP leader Alberto Nunez Feijoo attended the event. Feijoo instead visited towns in the eastern region of Valencia that were ravaged by recent floods that killed over 200 people.

“Sanchez, with Franco. Feijoo, with the people of Valencia,” the PP said in a statement.


France urges European Commission to be firm against Musk interference



By AFP
January 8, 2025


Elon Musk has provoked anger in Germany over his comments on the country's politics - Copyright POOL/AFP Christophe PETIT TESSON

France on Wednesday urged the European Commission to protect its member states with “the greatest firmness” against interference in political debate particularly from the billionaire owner of social media platform X, Elon Musk.

“Either the European Commission applies with the greatest firmness the laws that we have given ourselves to protect our public space, or it does not do so and then it will have to agree to give back the capacity to do so to the EU member states,” Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot told France Inter radio.

“We have to wake up,” he said.

Asked whether X could be banned in Europe, Barrot replied that such a mechanism to close a platform “is laid out in our laws.”

Musk, who has secured unprecedented influence thanks to his proximity to US president-elect Donald Trump, is set for a role in Trump’s administration.

He has provoked fury across Europe with a string of attacks on the continent’s leaders, including German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer.


French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot urged the European Commission to protect its member states against interference from the billionaire owner of social media platform X, Elon Musk – Copyright AFP JAM STA ROSA

“When you take part in a government or aspire to take part in one, your opinions have a rather special value,” said Barrot.

On Monday, French President Emmanuel Macron accused Musk of intervening in elections, including Germany’s snap legislative polls next month.

“Ten years ago, who could have imagined it if we had been told that the owner of one of the largest social networks in the world would support a new international reactionary movement and intervene directly in elections, including in Germany,” Macron said in a speech to French ambassadors.
LGBTQ+ RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS

Transgender Bathroom Ban Takes Effect in House-Controlled Capitol Spaces

Many transgender visitors to the House have stated they will not comply with the anti-trans bathroom policy.
 Truthout
January 8, 2025  
 
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson poses with Rep. Sarah McBride and members of McBride's family during a ceremonial swearing-in photo after being re-elected Speaker on the first day of the 119th Congress in the U.S. Capitol Building on January 3, 2025, in Washington, D.C.Andrew Harnik / Getty Images

Under a policy renewed on Friday by House Speaker Mike Johnson, transgender people will be prohibited from using single-sex bathrooms that correspond with their gender in areas belonging to the House of Representatives. The policy, which states that “all single-sex facilities — such as restrooms, changing rooms, and locker rooms — are reserved for individuals of that biological sex,” is now in effect.

Although earlier reports indicated that the policy was not officially part of the House rules package passed on Friday during the first session, the ban was listed among Speaker Johnson’s policies for the 119th Congress, as reflected in the Congressional Record, a daily account of congressional proceedings.

According to the Congressional Record, the policy will be enforced by the sergeant-at-arms and applies to “all areas of the Capitol subject to the Speaker’s general control.” This includes the House chamber, the hallways and pathways in the Capitol designated for House use, and any unassigned rooms in that area, per the House rules.

“While this will be enforced by the sergeant-at-arms, it’s still unclear how they intend to do so,” transgender legislative researcher Allison Chapman told Truthout.

While the policy was first proposed by Rep. Nancy Mace (R-South Carolina) in November to directly target the nation’s first openly trans member of Congress, Rep. Sarah McBride (D-Delaware), it will affect all transgender staff, interns and visitors to the House.

Related Story

GOP House Rep Aims to Ban Incoming Trans Lawmaker From Using Women’s Restrooms
Rep.-elect Sarah McBride called the proposal a distraction to “manufacture culture wars” and avoid important issues. By Chris Walker , Truthout November 19, 2024


“Transgender people have been working on the Hill for years and their bathroom usage has never been an issue,” Chapman told Truthout. “This rule is clearly an attempt to retaliate against Rep. McBride for her status as a transgender person. Unfortunately, all transgender people working and visiting in the House are now caught in the crosshairs of this hostile rule.”

In November, McBride disappointed many transgender activists by saying she would comply with the anti-trans policy. “I’m not here to fight about bathrooms,” McBride said in a statement. McBride has a private bathroom in her office and had previously stated that she planned to avoid using multi-stall women’s restrooms, likely to avoid this specific issue.

“No amount of attempting to ingratiate ourselves to the people who would sooner see us dead than happily transitioned is going to lead to our liberation,” Gavin Grimm, a transgender man and activist who sued his high school in 2015 after being banned from using the boys’ restroom due to being trans, wrote for the Bay Area Reporter. “The time for optics over action is over.”



Many transgender people who visit the House have said that they will refuse to comply with the policy. “I will under no circumstances be complying with this ban and intend to use the bathroom matching my gender regardless of cruel and unjust rule and laws,” Chapman said.

About 15 activists, including Raquel Willis and Chelsea Manning, were arrested for protesting the policy in December by staging a “sit-in” in a women’s bathroom across from Johnson’s congressional office in response to the anti-trans policy. The Gender Liberation Movement, which organized the protest, noted that the bathroom ban would affect “trans people at every level of government and in every sector of society,” in addition to “cisgender people who are perceived as gender non-conforming.”






Trudeau Coasted on Progressive Vibes, But Served the Interests of Corporations

Canadians flocked to food banks and inequality rose as corporations profited under Trudeau. He wasn’t “far to the left.”

HE IS NOT EVEN A SOCIAL DEMOCRAT; 
LIKE MOST CANADIENS
January 8, 2025

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau speaks during a news conference at Rideau Cottage in Ottawa, Canada, on January 6, 2025.
DAVE CHAN / AFP via Getty Images

Legislative action has ground to a halt in the Canadian Parliament, which has suspended its work until March. The legislative stop is now the Liberal Party’s de facto deadline for selecting a leader to replace Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who announced on Monday that he will resign as soon as his replacement has been chosen.

But despite the political turmoil, Canada’s wealthy are still having a field day. Corporate earnings are at record highs. In 2022, profits made in Canada were CAD$275 billion higher than they were in 2019. Profits in 2022 were the highest they have ever been in Canada’s existence. And while the jury is still out for where 2024 will land, Canada’s main stock exchange, the S&P/TSX Composite Index was 18 percent higher than last year and also reached record high levels at various points in the year.

Canada’s most important sectors have made huge financial gains since 2015, when Trudeau took office. Bank profits have trended higher. (For example, the Royal Bank’s 2023 profits were record-breaking, and at $16.24 billion, 62.4 percent higher than in 2015.) Oil and gas moved from a net income of $11.8 billion in 2014 to $63.1 billion in 2022 and benefit from a new, publicly funded pipeline that cost Canadians more than $34 billion to build. Insurance companies’ profits are breaking records. Profits in telecommunications hit a record high in 2022. You get the idea.

And CEOs are rolling in it. In 2024, Canada’s 100 top paid CEOs made $13.2 million, on average. It’s the third highest payout of all time — after 2021 and 2022.

Of course, there’s a flip side to this wealth accumulation: record-breaking numbers of visits to food banks; a housing crisis that exists in every single town and city across Canada (a crisis that, in the winter especially, leads to death and amputation); record-breaking income inequality. The Canada of 2025 is in a delicate, precarious state. People are on thin ice.

Related Story

Here’s What Canada’s Vote to End Arms Sales to Israel Means for Antiwar Effort
Canada’s Parliament passed a nonbinding motion to end arms sales to Israel — but not arms purchases from Israel. By Nora Loreto , Truthout  March 22, 2024


While we can’t give credit to or blame any single politician for where we find ourselves today, there’s no question that the policies of the federal government play an important role in reducing or exacerbating income inequality. The proof is in the pudding: Justin Trudeau has overwhelmingly served the interests of corporations and their leaders.

And so, when a narrative emerged from corporate media and analysts that Trudeau had to go because he had moved too far to the left, I did a spit take: What in the universe are they talking about?

The members of Parliament (MPs) who made this claim mostly spoke under a cloak of anonymity. Global News’ David Akin reported, “Almost all of the MPs Global News spoke to believe Trudeau has moved the party too far to the left and that shift has played a key role in the decline of the Liberals.” Akin didn’t say who or explain how these MPs were defining “the left.”

How can it be that a prime minister whose tenure saw record-breaking corporate performance paired with widening social inequality is also “too far to the left”? What kind of left-wing doctrine supports extreme income inequality and a tax structure that has failed to redistribute profits?

No one could reasonably believe that Trudeau’s economic policy was too far to the left. What they’re really saying is that Trudeau’s vibes were too far to the left. From the moment he took office, Trudeau draped himself in the language of the left but then never put that language into any useful action. Remember his famous mic drop moment when, after a journalist asked him why his cabinet had an equal number of women and men, he declared, “because it’s 2015”? Many concluded that Trudeau’s reply signaled that he was a feminist, unlike the previous prime minister, who flirted with anti-abortion activists and who would probably shrivel up and die if he found himself the lone man in a room full of trans-inclusive radical feminists.

But Trudeau’s policies weren’t even particularly feminist. And when his first justice minister, Jody Wilson-Raybould resigned, his feminist bona fides were called into question. Wilson-Raybould’s account of their confrontation painted a downright unfeminist portrait of the man.

One can coast on vibes for a bit, but vibes are not enough to support political regimes. From marching in Pride parades to taking a knee among Black Lives Matter activists, so much of Trudeau’s left-wing politics were vibes, and many of us could see through them.

In fact, in nine years, his government only accomplished one major progressive victory: the Canada Child Benefit. This benefit instantly lifted hundreds of thousands of children out of poverty. It offers the lowest-income Canadians $648.91 per month for every child under 6 years old. However, combined with broader social forces, even this benefit isn’t enough: Child poverty has been on the rise in the post-pandemic period.

Otherwise, Trudeau’s biggest promises were far more bluster than they were helpful. The Liberals’ pharmacare plan only covers two drugs at the moment and hasn’t been put into force through provincial agreements. Their new dental benefit isn’t yet fully operational, but when it is, it will only help low-income Canadians, many of whom won’t have the resources or access necessary to benefit from it. Universal daycare is great, if you’re lucky to be at a daycare that’s part of the program (and most aren’t) and still, it’s expensive.

A change to the tax code to subject more profits to tax hasn’t yet passed a vote in the House of Commons. (And if it doesn’t get passed before the election is called, it will die.) And promises to change the electoral system or create real changes within the housing market have been swept under the carpet.

Even pandemic-era benefits, arguably the most significant financial supports that the Trudeau government created (indeed, they built the most expensive social program in the history of Canada virtually overnight), collapsed after it was clear that the program turned into a mass transfer of public money to private coffers, with large businesses being the principal winners. The poorest Canadians received nothing, the Canadians who made more than $5,000 annually and lost a salary due to the pandemic received a monthly benefit that hundreds of thousands were forced to pay back, and small businesses who couldn’t pay back their business loans were thrown into chaos as they tried.

The cynicism around these programs was the quiet fuel that simmered the campaign that led to Trudeau’s demise. All this, while profitable companies like telecoms, and even some long-term care facilities that managed waves of mass death in their facilities, were each handed tens of millions of dollars in pandemic aid, no questions asked.

Half-measures have been the undoing of Trudeau’s popularity. Indeed, the vibes have run out, and people are realizing that their government isn’t exactly interested in helping them. And with few options on offer for help, many Canadians have parked their support with Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre, despite the Conservatives’ record of failure in reducing poverty or helping average people.

Mainstream media has pushed out most progressive journalists and commentators. This has created a world where what is or isn’t left-wing is defined by the right, and it’s usually a caricature of what left-wing politics really are.

The fact that Trudeau has occupied the place that journalists call “progressive” has left no space for Canadians to have a serious and credible conversation about progressive politics. Instead, mainstream journalists boost members of Parliament who look at the world, look at their party’s record and look at their leader and conclude: oh, the problem is that he was too left-wing.

Of course, there’s no truth in that. But what does truth matter, when you’re priming the next person to be just as friendly to the corporate world as the last one was?

This article is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), and you are free to share and republish under the terms of the license.


Nora Loreto is a writer and activist based in Quebec City. She is also the president of the Canadian Freelance Union.

Dr. Abu Safiya’s Mother Dies of Heart Attack as He’s Held in Brutal Israeli Camp


Former prisoners have reported that Israeli forces have subjected Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya to severe torture.
January 8, 2025
Dozens of health workers and other people demand the release of Dr. Hussam Abu Safiyah, director of the Kamal Adwan hospital, the only one remaining operational in the Gaza Strip, in Barcelona, Spain, on January 3, 2025. Protesters gather in front of the Department of Health in Barcelona.
Marc Asensio / NurPhoto via Getty Images


The mother of Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya, the director of Kamal Adwan Hospital, has reportedly died of a heart attack as Israel has refused to provide updates on the condition of the doctor as they hold him hostage in Israel’s most notorious torture camp for Palestinian detainees.

Her death was reported by Palestinian media outlets and MedGlobal, for which Abu Safiya is a lead physician. The head of MedGlobal, Zaher Sahloul, said in a press briefing that she died of “severe sadness” at the abduction and imprisonment of her son.

Abu Safiya’s Instagram account, where he often shared updates about Israel’s assaults of Kamal Adwan amid the genocide, also posted about her death. The account noted that Abu Safiya also lost his son recently in an Israeli attack.

“A new chapter of pain is added to the life of Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya, who has always been a symbol of patience and sacrifice. After losing his son while on duty, today he mourns the loss of his beloved mother, who passed away from a heart attack while he was unjustly and forcibly taken away from her,” the post said.

On December 27, Israeli forces totally took over Kamal Adwan after having attacked the facility and the neighborhood surrounding it for nearly two months straight. Soldiers detained numerous medical staff, including Abu Safiya. In his last update from the hospital, Abu Safiya said that Israeli forces were in the process of burning major units of the hospital in a “complete siege.”

Related Story

After Shuttering Kamal Adwan, Israel Attacks Last 2 Hospitals in Northern Gaza
If the facilities are totally evacuated, Israel will have emptied every last hospital in north Gaza. By Sharon Zhang , Truthout  January 3, 2025


In the following days, pictures and reports emerged showing that Abu Safiya had been arrested by Israeli forces and taken to Israel’s Sde Teiman camp — a brutal torture camp where soldiers rape, torture and sometimes kill Palestinian detainees, reports have found.

Palestinians released from the prison said that Abu Safiya was there and that Israeli forces had beaten the doctor severely just in his first days there. Many Palestinians have noted that Israeli forces have targeted health care workers with violence and arrest throughout the genocide; Israeli forces have also imprisoned Ahmed Muhanna, the director of northern Gaza’s Al-Awda Hospital, for over a year now.

Last week, Israeli authorities claimed that they had “no indication of the arrest or detention” of Abu Safiya, in response to an inquiry by Physicians for Human Rights – Israel (PHRI), despite numerous sources reporting his detention there.

After backlash, Israeli forces acknowledged that Abu Safiya was being detained, claiming it was due to suspicion of terrorist activity. Officials have provided zero evidence for this claim, and Israel is notorious for detaining Palestinians, including children, without charges.

Human rights advocates have called for updates on his condition and for his release. Amnesty International has called for him to be granted access to a lawyer and his family. However, PHRI said that Israel forces prevented a lawyer from meeting with Abu Safiya when the lawyer requested a visit on Sunday, saying that the lawyer can’t meet with Abu Safiya until January 10. PHRI has filed a petition in court demanding information on his whereabouts and condition.
WORD OF THE DAY

Indians in Flood-Prone Areas Are on Front Lines of Growing Mental Health Crisis

Health care workers in India note rising instances of solastalgia, the pain of seeing one’s home environment degrade.
January 5, 2025

In the past five years, Namdev Kamble has visited doctors over 150 times for persistent stress, anxiety, and body pain, which he says doesn’t go away.Sanket Jain

Whenever farmer Namdev Kamble visits a doctor, he remembers the hundreds of trees that once surrounded him. “We live in the same area today, but everything around us has changed completely,” he said in a voice heavy with nostalgia and loss.

On his way to his farmland in Shirdhon village of India’s Maharashtra state, Kamble would see the giant tamarind, babul, neem, and several other types of trees. “They gave relief and comfort,” he said. Over the years, these trees were cut to pave the way for broader roads, houses, industries and commercial crops like sugarcane.

Kamble finds it difficult to share his experiences. “It’s a completely different feeling. Sometimes, I feel anxious, nervous, and then I feel like I miss something, although I live in the same place,” the 77-year-old told Truthout.

Get our free emails

Email*









Kamble has been experiencing solastalgia, a form of emotional distress faced when the environment undergoes significant changes. It is caused by climate change, deforestation, rapid urbanization, and other environmental factors. Scholar Glenn Albrecht first introduced this term at a conference in Montreal in 2003, highlighting the unique mental pain of seeing one’s home environment degrade.

In his paper, Albrecht describes solastalgia as the pain experienced when the place one resides in and loves is under immediate assault. Derived from the word solace, Albrecht says, “Solastalgia is a form of homesickness one gets when one is still at home.”

Related Story

ICJ Set to Decide Whether Fueling Climate Change Violates International Law
The case could have critical consequences for the survival of future generations.
By Marjorie Cohn , Truthout December 16, 2024


Over the years, research on solastalgia has increased. However, studies remain limited, particularly in lower- and middle-income countries, which are severely impacted by the climate crisis. In India, the effects of this gap are becoming evident. As recurring floods, heat waves, and other climate impacts intensify, health care workers in India note rising instances of solastalgia, a deeply personal and distressing experience for those affected.
Tayna Kamble experiences solastalgia frequently, which she says has been affecting her mental health. Sanket Jain


Memories Tied to Surroundings


Kamble has been experiencing solastalgia for the past six years as he has witnessed environmental changes in his village. He remembers the Balanites aegyptiaca, commonly known as Hinganbet trees, which are over 19 feet tall. “There used to be thousands of them, and we would wash clothes using the fruit’s pulp,” he said. “Back then, washing soaps were hard to find in the village.”

Today, not a single such tree remains in his village. Moreover, Shirdhon has been grappling with the impacts of rising temperatures and recurring floods, which have further deepened Kamble’s feelings of solastalgia.

Kamble, who owns an acre of land, says the environment began to change over the last two decades, particularly after the trees disappeared. “Earlier, even after heavy rains, the water would drain within two days. Now it stays for over eight days, destroying all the crops and houses.”

“If neglected, solastalgia risks becoming a chronic condition that no one takes seriously until it reaches a point of unbearable or even fatal severity.”

Recurring floods have left him with mounting stress. Like Kamble, many Shirdhon residents, especially older ones, remain affected by the trauma of floods.

A government report from 2024 points out that 50 percent of the climate change-affected population in India suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Floods alone affected more than 218 million people in India from 2015 to 2020. However, what remains hidden in these numbers is the prevalence of solastalgia.

Sharada Jagtap, a community health care worker from Maharashtra’s flood-affected Kavatheguland village, emphasizes the need for support and understanding — both from the government as well as other community members. “Over the years, there has been a rise in stress levels, anxiety and mental health issues caused by recurring floods and changes in the environment,” she told Truthout.
The Growing Prevalence of Solastalgia

India experienced extreme weather events on 255 out of 274 days in the first nine months of 2024, according to an analysis by the Center for Science and Environment, an Indian think tank.

Many people like Kamble struggle to adapt to the changes and havoc these disasters bring. Research from northern India’s Bihar state found that climate change leads to loss of traditional customs and nature-related practices, which can eventually cause solastalgia. The study concluded that involuntary separation from traditional farm work, forced adaptation methods, loss of cultural practices and reduced self‐worth in coping with the deteriorating environment have all been concerns for parts of the state’s rural population. “The changing climate instigates feelings of emotional distress, resulting in adverse mental health and psychological well‐being outcomes,” the study found.

This phenomenon has been observed in other countries as well. A study of U.S. and U.K. residents found anticipatory solastalgia (worry about future environmental losses) to be a distinct response to climate change, and should not be conflated with generalized worry. In Australia, a study found solastalgia in bushfire-affected communities. The researchers described solastalgia as a “distinct challenge,” affecting not only bushfire-impacted communities but also those who perceived a profound loss of the unique elements that made their environment special, including native mammals and birds. The Australian study warned that environmental management that ignores local knowledge exacerbated solastalgia, leading to feelings of powerlessness. Another study from rural Australia found that while the word itself was not commonly used, Indigenous communities described experiencing feelings associated with solastalgia following unprecedented floods and bushfires.
Namdev Kamble and Tayna Kamble are among the many residents of Shirdhon village grappling with the emotional impact of solastalgia.  Sanket Jain


Deteriorating Health


With rapid changes in the climate and the village surroundings continuing to degrade, Kamble has begun to experience increased anxiety and stress. In the past five years, he says he has visited a doctor over 150 times, seeking treatment for stress, severe body pain and inflammation. “I feel helpless when I look at my surroundings, which causes me a lot of stress,” he said. This chronic stress eventually snowballed into hypertension.

He has now stopped working in the fields, further straining his family. “Earlier, he never fell sick, but now he visits a doctor almost every 15 days,” shared his wife, Tayna Kamble, who is in her late 60s and works on the farm to help the family.

Susi Ferrarello, an associate professor of philosophy at California State University, East Bay, believes solastalgia will become an increasingly common phenomenon. “It is essential to prepare to support the growing number of individuals experiencing this unique form of anxiety, which cannot be treated in the same way as other forms of anxiety,” she told Truthout. To do this, psychologists and clinical practitioners need to recognize solastalgia as a legitimate psychological phenomenon worthy of attention and study.

Jagtap says a major issue community health care workers like her face is the lack of awareness. “Many people aren’t even aware they are dealing with solastalgia,” she said. During her routine visits, she asks people about their mental health and connects them with mental health care professionals.

Recurring floods and the rapid changes in her surroundings have left farmworker Shakuntala Mohite with a lot of stress and anxiety, which she says are getting worse every year.  Sanket Jain


Unable to Share the Feelings

Shakuntala Mohite, 67, from Kurundvad town in Maharashtra, fondly remembers the days over a decade ago when she walked 15 kilometers to reach the farmland where she worked. “Hundreds of big trees surrounded the road,” she recalled.

While returning from work, it was a ritual for Mohite and her friends to sit beneath one of these trees for lunch. However, over the years, the number of trees steadily declined. Somehow, she began coping with the reality — and that’s when a flood devastated her house in 2019. Before she could recover from the trauma, another flood struck in 2021, submerging her house under seven feet of water.

The emotional distress of losing her house and surroundings started deteriorating her health, which she said led to severe anxiety and stress. Two years ago, she stopped working in the fields. Like Kamble, she also falls sick frequently.

“What will the young generation know of what the world looked like earlier? In the quest for rapid development, we are losing our connection to nature,” Mohite told Truthout.

Mohite barely expresses her emotions to anyone. “Who should I share such emotions with?” she said.

Ferrarello commented that human beings can adapt and adjust to almost anything — however, she warns that this comes at a cost. “Nature, traditionally seen as a sanctuary where we recharge and escape the stresses of daily life — whether through holidays, hikes or relaxing days at the beach — can become a source of constant threat. When this happens, it forces individuals to retreat, living in fear that the same traumatic experience might occur again,” she explained, noting how human-induced harm to the environment can manifest into stressors. In some cases, this fear can even lead to symptoms resembling those of PTSD, she added.

“If neglected, solastalgia risks becoming a chronic condition that no one takes seriously until it reaches a point of unbearable or even fatal severity, making effective treatment much harder to achieve,” Ferrarello said, highlighting the need for a timely diagnosis and acknowledgment of people’s lived experiences.

That’s where India’s community health care workers are stepping in. After extreme weather events like floods, these health care workers visit every house and speak at length with vulnerable people, often asking them to share their emotions. “While this might not help completely, people start experiencing some sense of safety once they start sharing their traumatic experiences,” said Jagtap who has spoken to thousands of people in her 15 years of experience.

However, Kamble adds that not everyone shares their experiences, especially when they feel they have lost all hope. Kamble, who once found solace sitting under the trees in the village, said none of those trees remain, and neither do his friends, who passed away over the years. “It’s difficult to live with this.”

This article is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), and you are free to share and republish under the terms of the license.


Sanket Jain is an independent journalist and documentary photographer from Maharashtra, India. His work has appeared in over 35 publications including Devex, MIT Technology Review, Yale Climate Connections, The British Medical Journal, Telegraph and Wired. He has reported extensively on climate change, mental health, agrarian crisis, public health care, and other issues through the lived experiences of everyday people. Jain has also been honored with Forbes’s 30 under 30 for his consistent reporting on climate change. In 2023, Covering Climate Now named him as a winner of its Emerging Journalist of the Year award.
15 of the 20 Most Destructive Wildfires in CA Have Occurred in the Past Decade

The effects of the climate crisis appear to be making California wildfires more destructive.
January 8, 2025
Firefighters battle the Eaton Fire in strong winds as many homes burn on January 7, 2025, in Pasadena, California.David McNew / Getty Images

Honest, paywall-free news is rare. Please support our boldly independent journalism with a donation of any size.

The wildfires in southern California, which have so far resulted in thousands of acres burning in and near Los Angeles, will likely go down as among the most destructive fires the state has ever seen in terms of property damage.

Wildfires in the Pacific Palisades, Eaton and Hurst are threatening the lives of tens of thousands of people in the area. In Palisades specifically, a large neighborhood in western Los Angeles, over 5,000 acres have been burned as of Wednesday morning.

The fires have had a devastating impact, leaving at least two people dead and others injured. Around 80,000 residents in the Los Angeles area are already under mandatory evacuation orders, and in Malibu, officials are urging residents to make evacuation plans now rather than wait for an order later on. Theme parks in the area are closed until further notice.

“Evacuate now, especially if you need extra time,” the city’s official account on X advised.

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass is warning that conditions will get worse before they get better, citing strong winds that have been plaguing the region during the wildfires that don’t show signs of slowing anytime soon. Several counties in California are under “red flag” warnings, meaning critical fire conditions are occurring, including fast and strong winds and warm temperatures. Wind gusts are reaching as high as 99 miles per hour. The National Weather Service is describing the situation as “extremely critical fire weather.”

Related Story

Record-Breaking Heat, Wildfires and Storms Globally Linked to Climate Change
In 2023, record-high sea temperatures increased hurricane intensification, raising the risk of more destructive storms. By Beth Daley , TheConversation December 31, 2023


“For some context, fire crews are up against near hurricane-force winds occurring mid-winter in rugged terrain during a drought at night,” explained meteorologist Eric Holthaus, discussing work to contain the fire overnight. “There is no ‘firefighting’ in these kinds of conditions. There is only saving as many lives as possible and getting the heck out of the fire’s way.”

High wind speeds are due to the Santa Ana winds, a typical weather phenomenon seen in California during cooler months. But while the winds are not unusual, other conditions fueling the wildfires — including an atypical midwinter drought — are likely a result of the climate crisis.

Indeed, multiple studies and analyses have demonstrated that the effects of the climate crisis are worsening wildfires not just in California, but throughout the world. One report published last year found that the global climate crisis is causing three-quarters of the world’s land to become drier. Expanding drylands can contribute to a number of detrimental outcomes, including the degradation of agricultural systems, increases in immense dust storms, and the intensification of wildfires.

Looking at California specifically, it’s evident that the effects of the climate crisis have exacerbated the intensity of wildfires in recent years. According to figures from the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, 15 of the 20 most destructive wildfires in the state’s history have occurred within the past decade. All but two of those 20 recorded wildfires have happened since the start of the 21st century.

Those figures do not include any of the wildfires currently affecting the state, as their damage has yet to be assessed. However, the Los Angeles area wildfires will likely be added to the list of the most destructive fires in California’s history — although the Palisades wildfire is much smaller, in terms of acreage, than many other fires on the list, it is currently threatening over 13,000 structures, including more than 10,000 households.

Even if just a quarter of those structures end up being destroyed by the wildfire, it would rank the Palisades fire in third place on the list of most destructive wildfires ever seen in California. As of Wednesday morning, more than 1,000 structures in the neighborhood have been destroyed, officials said, ranking it as the 17th most destructive wildfire in the state’s history.


Biden’s Offshore Drilling “Ban” Won’t Protect Gulf of Mexico From Oil Spills


Biden invoked the 2010 BP oil spill, but his ban doesn’t include the area of the Gulf where the spill occurred.

By Mike Ludwig , TruthoutPublishedJanuary 7, 2025
The sun sets over an oil platform waiting to be towed out into the Gulf of Mexico at Port Fourchon in Louisiana
Mark Ralston / AFP via Getty Images

Democrats in Congress cheered as President Joe Biden moved on January 6 to withdraw 625 million acres federal ocean waters off United States coastlines from consideration for future offshore oil and gas drilling. Democratic lawmakers say the waters are “permanently” protected, although Republicans could use their majority in Congress to force the government to lease underwater drilling rights to the industry.

However, Biden’s last-minute effort to secure his climate legacy before Donald Trump takes office does nothing to prevent offshore drilling in the central and western Gulf of Mexico, where intense fossil fuel exploitation already causes pollution and oil spills as climate change brings intensifying floods and storms to coastal communities.

In a statement, Biden called the massive BP oil spill that devastated the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 a “solemn reminder” of the risks offshore drilling poses to fisheries and coastal communities — but the area of the Gulf where the spill occurred is not protected under Biden’s executive action.

According to a White House fact sheet, Biden is using his authority under federal law to withdraw from future oil and gas lease sales all federal ocean waters off the East and West coasts, the eastern Gulf of Mexico, and additional portions of the Northern Bering Sea in Alaska. The Interior Department regularly leases vast swaths of public lands and waters to private companies for oil and gas production, including in the Gulf of Mexico, where the industry has left hundreds of out-of-use wells and drilling platforms to rust in the open sea.

Under Biden’s current executive action, the deep central region of the Gulf — where the deadly Deepwater Horizon explosion unleashed roughly 134 million gallons of oil in 2010 — will remain open for current and future oil and gas drilling, along with western Gulf waters off Texas and Louisiana.

Biden’s executive action withdrew federal waters in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, as well as the Eastern Gulf of Mexico, from leasing consideration for potential offshore oil and gas drilling.Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

During his first weeks in office, Biden attempted to temporarily pause offshore oil and gas leasing in the Gulf but was met with legal challenges from the industry. Biden’s latest executive action does protect the eastern Gulf, which the industry has eyed for years, but a moratorium on drilling meant to protect Florida’s tourism industry and pristine beaches has been in place for years and would have not expired until 2032.

Globs of oil and dead marine life from the 2010 oil spill still washed up on Florida beaches despite the moratorium on drilling in the eastern Gulf enacted by Congress in 2006. Tourism plummeted from Miami to New Orleans, Louisiana. Martha Collins, executive director of the watchdog group Healthy Gulf, said the Gulf of Mexico is one body of water that cannot be artificially divided by policymakers.

Related Story

EPA Plans to Allow Unlimited Dumping of Fracking Wastewater in the Gulf of Mexico
Environmentalists say the EPA should prohibit, not permit, the dumping of fracking fluids into the ocean.
By Mike Ludwig , Truthout September 22, 2016

“If your goal is to protect the eastern Gulf, then you have to protect the Gulf as a whole; you can’t dissect a huge body of water like this,” Collins said in an interview. “It strikes me that you are protecting one community versus another when all of the Gulf communities need protection from climate change and the devastating impacts of the oil and gas industry.”

Thanks to the fracking boom and the wealthy oil industry’s deep political influence, private companies are now producing more crude oil in the U.S. than any other nation on the planet at any time in history. Still, Trump has threatened to “unleash” the fossil fuel industry after slashing environmental regulations and enforcement during his first term.

Asked about offshore drilling by a conservative radio host on Monday, Trump called Biden’s last-minute move “ridiculous” and pledged to “unban” offshore drilling without detailing how he would do so. Federal courts have already upheld the president’s authority to restrict oil and gas leasing under Section 12(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act.

Rep. Jared Huffman, the ranking Democrat on the House Natural Resources Committee, said Biden’s action on offshore drilling is “Trump-proof.”

“We know the President-elect will do everything in his power to enact his ‘drill baby drill’ agenda, but fortunately for us all, handing our oceans over to Big Oil billionaires will be off the table,” Huffman said in a statement on Monday.

However, the areas of ocean protected by Biden’s action were not on the table to begin with, at least not for the immediate future.

On the West Coast, California has had a moratorium on drilling in state waters since a devastating oil spill in 1969, and federal waters off of southern California were withdrawn from lease sales back in 1984. Modern oil and gas leasing has never occurred off the coast of Oregon and Washington, or in the Atlantic Ocean.

In Alaska, Biden’s ban on future offshore drilling leases will expand the Northern Bering Sea Climate Resilience Area by 44 million acres, protecting migrating marine life and coastal Indigenous communities. Biden previously enraged climate activists in 2023 when his administration approved the massive Willow oil project on pristine public lands in northern Alaska

.
Biden has withdrawn nearly 45 million acres of federal waters off the coast of Alaska from consideration for leasing for future offshore oil and gas projects.
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

Undoing Biden’s decision to withdraw hundreds of millions of acres of U.S. ocean waters from the oil and gas leasing program would likely require an act of Congress, and Republicans are already threatening to overturn the policy. Still, offshore drilling is extremely unpopular with voters, especially those living on or near the coast.

Trump encountered this political reality during his first term. At first, Trump pushed open nearly all U.S. coastal waters to offshore drilling before facing backlash, including in his home state of Florida. By 2020, Trump had agreed to temporarily ban drilling off the coasts of Florida, Georgia and South Carolina for 12 years. When signing the ban, Trump said drilling was “not going to happen” because “the people of Florida just don’t want it.”

If Trump were to work with Republicans in Congress to “undo” Biden’s ban on future offshore drilling leases, which region would he open up to the fossil fuels? Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort is on the Atlantic side of Florida, so opening up the eastern Gulf — and west Florida’s coastal waters — to drilling would likely generate massive controversy. Trump supporters on the Atlantic and Pacific coasts may not appreciate the prospect of oil rigs going up off their shores either.

“It will be really interesting to see if he starts complaining about it and specifically, what he targets,” Miller said.

“Inexcusable”: Khanna Explains How Democrats Failed to Trump-Proof Labor Board

Democrats had the chance to secure a majority on the NLRB for two years into Trump’s term, but failed to do so.

January 8, 2025

Rep. Ro Khanna speaks to flight attendants, members, and supporters of the WGA and SAG-AFTRA on the picket line outside Netflix and Warner Bros. on August 17, 2023, in New York City.
Alexi Rosenfeld / Getty Images

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-California) has shined a light on how Democrats botched a recent chance to secure a majority on a top U.S. labor authority for the first two years of Trump’s upcoming term, in an “inexplicable and inexcusable” blunder that will likely have dire consequences for millions of workers for years to come.

On December 11, the Senate held a vote on renewing Democrat Lauren McFerran as National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) chair just days before her term expired. Labor advocates were outraged after news broke that the vote failed 49 to 50, with Senators Joe Manchin (I-West Virginia) and Kyrsten Sinema (I-Arizona), formerly Democrats, voted against reconfirming her for a five-year term.

If the Senate had confirmed McFerran, Democrats would have secured a 3-2 majority on the board for the next two years. Instead, Trump will likely nominate a Republican and flip the labor board, in “a huge setback for the hundreds of thousands of workers across this country organizing for a better contract,” Khanna said.

Labor advocates and progressives largely blamed Manchin and Sinema for the vote, as they were instrumental in taking away the Democrats’ majority. But, as Khanna revealed on Tuesday, Democratic leaders also played a key role in handing Republicans the majority.

In a thread on social media, Khanna said Democrats, in fact, had a window to confirm McFerran that morning, while Manchin and two Republicans were absent from the chamber. For 90 minutes, Democrats had the opportunity to call in Vice President Kamala Harris to act as a tie-breaking vote for the confirmation, which needed only to pass with a simple majority. Instead, Senate leaders delayed the vote for “no reason,” Khanna said, and allowed Manchin to return and tank the vote.

Related Story

Manchin, Sinema Block Renomination of Key NLRB Board Member, a Win for Trump
Lauren McFerran has been blocked from returning to the NLRB, meaning that Trump can name her successor in January. By Chris Walker , Truthout December 12, 2024

That morning, Democratic leaders like Senate Majority Chuck Schumer (D-New York) “failed to get word to Vice President Harris quickly enough to come and deliver the tie-breaking vote,” Khanna explained.

“These procedural blunders have massive implications for the American people, who deserve better from their elected officials. American workers deserve an explanation,” Khanna went on. “It will hurt the young folks organizing at Starbucks and the workers organizing at Amazon. It’s inexcusable and inexplicable that we did not prioritize confirming the NLRB appointees like we do federal judges and have ceded the Board two years before we needed to.”

Khanna also pointed out that Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Chair Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) had advanced McFerran’s confirmation at the beginning of August, giving Democrats plenty of time to reconfirm her.

Labor unions have denounced the failure to reconfirm McFerran. The AFL-CIO said the vote was not about McFerran or her qualifications, but about “reversing generations of progress workers have made toward building a fairer and more just economy.”

In recent years, there has been a massive groundswell of labor activity as organizers, especially young ones, have waged landmark unionization campaigns, spurring a historic upturn in union and labor activity, with union elections doubling throughout Joe Biden’s term. In this time, the labor board has made several major rulings tilting the scales back in favor of workers in an environment otherwise extremely hostile to workers’ rights.

Trump and his corporate and conservative allies have pledged to attack labor rights and defang the NLRB. Trump’s first term offered a preview of this; in 2020, for instance, the NLRB under Trump overturned a 70-year precedent that protected workers for occasional use of strong language.