Friday, January 17, 2025

 SCI-FI-TEK-70YRS IN THE MAKING

UT secures $20 million DOE grant to develop critical nuclear fusion materials




University of Tennessee at Knoxville

UT secures $20M DOE grant 

image: 

Professor Steven Zinkle, UT-ORNL Governor’s Chair for Nuclear Materials, talks with Munireach Nannory, first-year masters student, Civil and Structural Engineering, while preparing to test materials samples using a 3MV tandem accelerator with multiple beamlines and stations in the Ion Beam Materials Laboratory (IBML) inside Senter Hall.

view more 

Credit: Steven Bridges/University of Tennessee




The University of Tennessee, Knoxville’s Tickle College of Engineering has been awarded a $20 million grant from the U.S. Department of Energy for a groundbreaking project led by UT-Oak Ridge National Laboratory Governor’s Chair for Nuclear Materials Steve Zinkle. The project, known as the Integrated Materials Program to Accelerate Chamber Technologies, or IMPACT, aims to revolutionize the design and manufacturing of high-performance materials for fusion energy systems.

“We are excited to embark on this ambitious program,” Zinkle said. “Our assembled multidisciplinary team includes experts with a demonstrated track record of using science-based methods to rapidly design, fabricate and deploy advanced structural materials.”

One of the biggest challenges in making fusion energy commercially viable is the lack of nuclear-code-qualified high-temperature structural materials that can be used in fusion reactors. IMPACT aims to create a process and database for the first-ever American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel code qualification for a fusion material and to demonstrate how these new materials can more quickly move from code qualification to engineering application.

UT  has one of the best nuclear engineering programs in the country, including a new minor that launched in fall 2024. The IMPACT team led by Zinkle includes three other Tickle College of Engineering faculty members: Eric Lass, an assistant professor in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering; Bradley Jared, an associate professor in the Department of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Biomedical Engineering; and Khalid Hattar, an associate professor in the Department of Nuclear Engineering.

The DOE launched the FIRE Collaboratives initiative last year to establish collaborative networks that bridge the gap between fusion research and industry.

FIRE Collaboratives consist of teams from government facilities, academia and industry that come together to address technical challenges on the road to commercial fusion development. Through the FIRE Collaboratives, the DOE hopes to accelerate the transition of scientific discoveries into commercial fusion applications.

The other institutions involved in the project are Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Stony Brook University; the University of Michigan; Northwestern University; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; the University of California, Santa Barbara; Idaho National Laboratory; the University of Miami; and the University of California, Los Angeles.


US Department of Energy announces selectees for $107 million fusion innovation research engine collaboratives, and progress in milestone program inspired by NASA



New awards from DOE will support acceleration of commercial fusion energy toward viability



DOE/US Department of Energy



WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced $107 million in funding for six projects in the Fusion Innovative Research Engine (FIRE) Collaboratives, and that several privately funded fusion companies have completed early critical-path science and technology (S&T) milestones in the Milestone-Based Fusion Development Program (“the Milestone Program”). Both programs, administered by DOE’s Fusion Energy Sciences (FES) program in the Office of Science, are cornerstones of DOE’s fusion strategy to accelerate the viability of commercial fusion energy. 

“The launch of the DOE Milestone Program and FIRE Collaboratives are critical steps in accelerating progress toward the U.S. Bold Decadal Vision for Commercial Fusion Energy,” said Deputy Secretary of Energy David Turk. “As the world races to make fusion a viable source of energy for industry and consumers, these programs signal that the U.S. intends to be the first to commercialize fusion energy through strong partnerships among our National Laboratories, universities, and the private sector to realize industry-led designs for fusion pilot plants.” 

FIRE Collaboratives Project Selections 

The FIRE Collaboratives are aimed at creating a fusion energy S&T innovation ecosystem by forming virtual, centrally managed teams called “Collaboratives” that have a collective goal of bridging FES’s basic science research programs with the needs of the growing fusion industry, including the activities supported under the Milestone Program. 

This initiative represents a significant step forward in FES’s commitment to advancing fusion energy research and development, and aims to create new economic opportunities, maintain US leadership in fusion, bolster US-based manufacturing and supply chains, and enable the development of technologies crucial for national security, energy security, and defense. 

FES is pleased to announce the first awards for the FIRE Collaboratives that support materials and technologies required by a diverse set of fusion concepts. They include developing nuclear blanket testing capabilities at Idaho National Laboratory, materials development at the University of Tennessee – Knoxville, materials testing and advanced simulation capabilities at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, target injector technology for inertial fusion energy concepts, and fusion fuel-cycle testing capabilities at Savannah River National Laboratory.  

Total anticipated funding for FIRE collaboratives is $180 million for projects lasting up to four years in duration. Additional awards drawing from the same pool of proposals may be made in the future. This is contingent on the availability of funds appropriated by Congress. 

The list of projects and more information can be found on the Fusion Energy Sciences program homepage

Selection for award negotiations is not a commitment by DOE to issue an award or provide funding. Before funding is issued, DOE and the applicants will undergo a negotiation process, and DOE may cancel negotiations and rescind the selection for any reason during that time.   

Progress in the Milestone Program 

The Milestone Program is modeled in part after the NASA Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program. With relatively modest federal investments, the COTS program enabled private companies to meet early technical milestones on the way to building today’s commercial space-launch industry. 

Analogous to the earlier NASA COTS program, privately funded fusion companies in the DOE Milestone Program pursue both S&T and business/commercialization milestones (mutually negotiated with DOE). They receive federal payments after DOE verifies completion of each milestone through independent, expert review. The private company provides greater than 50% (in many cases much greater than 50%) of the cost to meet milestones. The company benefits both through the non-dilutive capital it receives from the government as well as through DOE’s validation of milestone completion, which are both helpful for subsequent private fundraising. 

Thus, the Milestone Program acts as a catalyst, where strategic federal investments are significantly amplified with follow-on private funding. To date, Milestone awardees have collectively raised over $350 million of new private funding since their selection into the program was announced in May 2023, compared to the $46 million of federal funding initially committed for negotiated milestones. The benefit to the U.S. public is the de-risking of multiple fusion-development paths that have both been peer-reviewed to be technically credible and are well aligned with commercial factors and needs. 

Specifically, the 8 awardees of the present DOE Milestone Program are working to resolve critical-path S&T gaps, in partnership with national laboratories and universities, toward realizing preliminary engineering designs for their fusion pilot plants (FPPs). The most aggressive and well-funded of the awardees are aiming for successful FPP preliminary-design reviews by the late 2020s to meet the ambitious and aspirational timeline of realizing an operating FPP by the mid-2030s. 

S&T milestones that have been met by companies thus far include the following: 

Quantitative metrics were required to be met for these milestones. The specific metrics are typically protected information of the companies. The other Milestone awardees are Commonwealth Fusion Systems, Tokamak Energy, Type One Energy, Xcimer Energy, and Zap Energy, all of whom are working on their early S&T milestones as well. 

All 8 awardees are presently working toward presenting pre-conceptual designs and technology roadmaps of their FPP concepts within the first 18 months of the Milestone program—roughly late 2025 (18 months into the Milestone Program). If they successfully meet these milestones, they will proceed into the next phase of the Milestone Program, where all the awardees are planning to build and operate major next-step integrated experiments and/or demonstrate some of the critical underlying technologies for their FPPs. Continued progress in the Milestone program is contingent on Congressional appropriations, successful negotiation of future milestones, and successful progress in the program. 

The DOE Milestone-Based Fusion Development Program was first authorized in the Energy Act of 2020 and received its first funding appropriation in fiscal year 2022. The program was announced in September 2022 and, following a rigorous merit-review process, 8 selectees were announced in May 2023. Initially, $46 million has been obligated for the first 18 months of the program. The program is authorized for a total of $415 million through fiscal year 2027 in the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022. 


State-of-the-art fusion simulation leads three scientists to the 2024 Kaul Foundation Prize


Prize Their simulation is one of many critical insights that have come from decades of work on a computer code known as XGC



DOE/Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

PPPL’s Seung-Hoe Ku, Choongseok (CS) Chang, and Robert Hager 

image: 

The winners of the 2024 Kaul Foundation Prize for Excellence in Plasma Physics Research and Technology Development: PPPL’s Seung-Hoe Ku, Choongseok (CS) Chang, and Robert Hager.

view more 

Credit: Michael Livingston / PPPL Communications Department




Three scientists were awarded the 2024 Kaul Foundation Prize for Excellence in Plasma Physics Research and Technology Development based on their decades of groundbreaking research about how plasma behaves in fusion reactors. 

Choongseok (CS) ChangSeung-Hoe Ku and Robert Hager of the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) were recognized “for experimentally validated simulations of turbulence-broadened divertor heat flux widths using the X-Point Included Gyrokinetic Code (XGC),” following decades of research developing comprehensive simulations to model the fusion plasma edge. 

Recently, the scientists – in collaboration with researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and other collaborators working on the DIII-D fusion device at General Atomics – determined that these simulations closely matched experiments in the DIII-D. The research showed that the turbulence doubles the exhaust layer width in conditions similar to what would be found in a commercial-scale reactor such as ITER. This is an important experimental validation that XGC can describe the relevant underlying physics, helping support XGC predictions that ITER could have a much broader exhaust footprint than what has been predicted by present tokamak data. 

This simulation code has been critical for a great deal of research that has advanced fusion science. The code simulates the whole volume of a tokamak plasma, especially the edge region of the magnetically confined plasma that includes the area where magnetic field lines cross, which is known as the X-point. This area is particularly important to study because of its reduced confining magnetic field strength, which can allow plasma particles to escape confinement. XGC is widely considered one of the best such codes available and is used by researchers worldwide on some of the planet’s most powerful computers

“This work has brought great honor to the Lab,” said PPPL Director Steve Cowley when he presented the award at PPPL’s annual State of the Lab address. “This high-performance computing exascale project code, developed at our Lab, is also being honored by the U.S. Secretary of Energy with the prestigious Secretary’s Honor Award as part of the broader exascale computing initiative.”

Using very powerful hardware, exascale computers can perform one quintillion (or a billion billion) calculations per second, which makes them faster than the most powerful supercomputers currently used. 

Each recipient of the annual Kaul Foundation Prize receives $7,500 in recognition of their scientific achievement. The prize was established with funds from the late PPPL Director Ronald C. Davidson’s 1993 Award for Excellence in Science, Education and Physics. It honors outstanding contributions to research in plasma physics. 

Notably, the 2024 winners used XGC to determine critical details about how ions and electrons escape the core plasma during fusion when the plasma is confined by magnetic fields inside a tokamak. Their highly sophisticated simulation is for ITER, the multinational fusion facility under construction in France. The simulation suggests that a key region of the ITER wall should not get as hot as once feared based on the experimental data from present-day tokamaks.

“We would like to thank the national and international XGC team members. For the divertor heat load research, credit goes to the ITER Organization collaborators led by Alberto Loarte and Richard Pitts; PPPL, DIII-D, Alcator C-Mod, National Spherical Torus Experiment and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory participants in the 2016 DOE Office of Science national theory milestone activities that led to the discovery of the ion leakage and turbulent electron loss physics that are responsible for plasma exhaust. We also thank the joint PPPL/DIII-D research team led by Alessandro Bortolon for the XGC application on DIII-D edge plasma and Darin Ernst of MIT for collaborating with us to simulate his experiments in ITER-like conditions, which turned out to be ideal for validating the XGC simulations,” said Chang. 

“We hope to see more experimental validations on other tokamaks. We also would like to thank the tremendous support from the DOE program managers, DOE computer centers and PPPL management, which made the research possible.”

Choongseok (CS) Chang

After graduating with a doctoral degree in physics from the University of Texas at Austin in 1979, Chang was a senior scientist at General Atomics in San Diego before holding a tenure position at the Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology (KAIST). He later moved back to the U.S. and worked at the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences at New York University (NYU) before ultimately landing at PPPL in 2011.

Chang’s long career in plasma physics has focused on solving key theoretical challenges to make fusion a reliable source of electricity. Chang has spent decades leading multidisciplinary teams of physicists, applied mathematicians and computer scientists — including those who use artificial intelligence — to lead the development of XGC and simulate the extremely complex environment inside fusion reactors. 

“Plasma is not a single physics phenomenon. Several physics interact together. But that was a very difficult theory to develop,” said Chang. Additionally, the problem was multiscale, meaning it needed to be studied at multiple levels of detail. 

“Fortunately, I had a hunch in the late 1990s that computers would become more and more powerful so we could solve these problems,” Chang said. He recruited “a few brilliant students” to work on this important task. Among them, Ku was the main workforce. At the time, creating models that considered multiple physics simultaneously was considered nearly impossible. But Chang and the talented team – especially Ku – persisted. Ultimately, the work developing the necessary computer codes that could realize his multiphysics vision would receive substantial funding from the DOE and recognition from major U.S. computer centers. The success of this work eventually led Chang to resign from his positions in Korea and at NYU to fully dedicate himself to the XGC project and scientific discovery at PPPL. More young and talented physicists joined the development team and raised the code to a higher capability level. Among them, Hager became another distinguished developer and physics researcher.

One of the most rewarding aspects for Chang is seeing his younger group members become successful computational physicists in their own right. His advice to young physicists is to think big. “Don’t be afraid to attack challenging and ambitious scientific problems,” he said.

Seung-Hoe Ku

Ku has been a research physicist at the Lab since 2011, following Chang’s move. He received his doctoral degree in physics from KAIST in 2004. 

Ku has been deeply involved in the research and development of the XGC code for decades, starting from when he was a graduate student at KAIST. Ku was effectively the sole person writing an initial version of what would one day become the backbone of XGC while he was still a graduate student. 

“This has been a lifelong pursuit,” Ku said. He has seen the code through many iterations, moving it from a two-dimensional code into three dimensions and adding code to include turbulence, for example.

“When I extended it to 3D, a few people came on board to help with code performance,” Ku said. Now, many people around the world are working on XGC, with Ku and Hager focusing on managing the core of the code. 

Ku has been interested in physics since middle school. In high school, he also developed an interest in coding. With some friends, Ku wrote what he describes as a precursor to the popular video game Angry Birds. “You throw the ball, and then it calculates the trajectory,” Ku said. “At the time, it was just for fun. But I think that’s my first physics simulation of particles.”

Ku would like to thank his wife, Haehyun Nam, for her patience.

Robert Hager

Hager received a doctoral degree in plasma physics jointly from the Technical University of Munich and the Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics in 2011. The following year, he came to PPPL as a postdoctoral researcher. Hager has been working with Chang and Ku on XGC ever since. He became a core developer and is now a research physicist at the Lab. 

“Winning the Kaul Prize is confirmation that what we’ve been doing all those years actually makes sense and produces good results,” Hager said. People sometimes question why he would work so hard on a code that is so complex it can only run using the world’s most powerful computers. “Now, finally, I think more people are seeing our results and realizing we can reproduce what people are seeing in experiments and get better insights,” Hager said.

In addition to being one of the main authors and managers of XGC, Hager is also responsible for training and supporting XGC users worldwide.

Hager says the field was definitely the right choice for him. “As a scientist, you sometimes have long stretches where nothing seems to work. But when you find a solution, you understand something new, and that is so rewarding. I also like the technical aspect, tinkering with computer tools.”

Like many in the field, Hager was initially drawn to plasma physics because of the environmental aspect of clean energy from fusion. However, there were also personal factors: His position at Max Planck brought him closer to his girlfriend, who he would later marry. “I would like to thank my wife, Sofia, my Ph.D. supervisor Klaus Hallatschek and everyone who helped make XGC what it is today.”




Research sparks prevention techniques for wildfires and outages

Engineers are studying ways to monitor power lines for faults and failures to correct those conditions before an outage or fire occurs.


Texas A&M University

 Feature Story | 16-Jan-2025


Fires can start in 10s of milliseconds, and approximately 10% of wildfires are started by something related to the power system.

For over 30 years, researchers in the Power System Automation Laboratory in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Texas A&M University have been studying ways to monitor electric power lines for faults and failures to correct those conditions before an outage, fire or catastrophic failure occurs.

In that time, they have conducted several projects to enhance their Distribution Fault Anticipation (DFA) system. The idea is to anticipate a fault before it happens.

Made up of a four-man team that has been conducting research together for decades, Professor B. Don Russell and Principal Research Engineers Carl Benner, Jeffrey Wischkaemper and Karthick Manivannan are working on a nearly $3.2 million Department of Energy (DOE) project titled “Preventing Wildfire Ignition from Powerline Equipment Failures Using ML-Based Classification of Real-Time Electrical Measurements.”

What started as a focus on failure diagnosis of mechanisms on power lines evolved into wildfire and power outage prevention caused by power lines.

“We recognized that a lot of what we were detecting — failures and abnormal conditions out on the power system — were also causing wildfires. And that was just serendipitous. That wasn’t because we set out to do something to fix wildfires,” Russell said.

In combination with growing drought conditions over the last decade, environmental climate change, and changing rain and humidity levels around the country, wildfires have notably grown.

“About 10 years ago, we recognized there was a very substantial increase in the number of wildfires that had been started by electric power lines in the United States,” Russell said.

Since power lines are pervasive in the United States’ geography, a fire could happen anywhere. Most of the vulnerable territories are in rural areas where nobody’s there to observe a fire start and report it.

For one project, the team worked for four years with seven Texas utility companies and received a multi-million-dollar grant from the state of Texas to study the impact of power lines on wildfire ignition and what could be done to prevent fires.

During this project, the team developed techniques that could find and allow companies to fix mechanisms that start wildfires. The main causes of wildfires are weather and human actions, such as dry lightning, an unattended barbecue pit, or burning trash. Each year, up to 10% of fires are started by power lines.

How Do Fires Get Started From Power Lines?

Power line conductors in the air can move around substantially in high wind conditions, and if they hit each other—called a conductor clash—they throw off incandescent metal particles that are ignition mechanisms.

Fires can also start from equipment failure. This can occur if a transformer explodes or a pole falls over and lines end up on the ground, or a connector, the device holding the power lines together, overheats and drops melted metal.

The single largest issue is when power lines break in the air, fall to earth and arc to the ground. Arcing conditions sometimes only last for half a second, but it doesn’t take long to start a fire. To make matters worse, sometimes these ground fault conditions are not easily detectable.

The team is examining how conditions in the air affect power lines to prevent them from falling. The team’s algorithms can detect small arcing conditions and failures from miles away. Their DFA system can give utilities up to weeks’ notice of a problem long before catastrophic failure.

“If we can find the issue and tell utilities it’s happening today, they can find and fix it by tomorrow,” Russell said. “We’ve been able to predict the location of power line equipment failure, which left alone for two weeks could have etched through the conductor and dropped lines to the ground. But we identified the problem weeks in advance and were able to prevent disaster.”

For example, MidSouth Electric Cooperative, a utility company in Navasota, tested DFA and uses it daily. In one instance, a clamp started arcing in the Sam Houston National Forest, which could easily start a fire. The DFA system identified the issue and notified the utility company. They were able to repair the clamp and prevent an outage or a fire.

Using AI And Machine Learning

Currently, the team is using conventional algorithms and computer science programming to conduct research. However, their DOE project will look at expanding that technology through artificial intelligence and machine learning to improve DFA sensitivity and reliability for early detection of failures.

“When the Department of Energy asked for projects under the Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security and Emergency Response program, we proposed to take all the work we had done over the past 30 years as the foundation and build on that to look for substantial improvements using machine learning and artificial intelligence,” Russell said.

“We’ve been able to detect many failure mechanisms for 15 years, and we’re getting better and better at it, but machine learning carries some distinct possibilities for the future,” Russell added “Hopefully, it will result in even better diagnostic tools to find those things that cause not only wildfires, but also outages for customers.”

The future project also has international scope. The team currently has test systems in Australia, New Zealand, Scotland and England, as well as the United States. Australia and New Zealand have a high risk for wildfire issues, and England and Scotland’s concern is primarily improving reliability.

“This is a tool, not just for wildfire mitigation, but to significantly improve the reliability of service. It would benefit everybody that uses it, even if they’re not in a wildfire-prone area,” Russell said.

By Katie Satterlee, Texas A&M Engineering

###

 

East Asia meets Europe in Lower Austria



Ancient genomes show integration of genetically different groups to the same early medieval Avar society in the Vienna Basin, Austria



Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology

Avar-period cloak clasp 

image: 

An Avar-period cloak clasp from a female grave at Moedling, Austria. Archers were associated with a higher social status.

view more 

Credit: © Benedict Seidl, benedicts.1995@gmail.com




Research combining expertise of various disciplines found that genes and culture do not have to match. The latest findings from the European Research Council project HistoGenes emerged from a genetic study of burial grounds from the Avar period in the 8th century CE. The Avars had arrived in the 6th century from the East Asian Steppes and settled in East Central Europe among a mixed population.

Despite their rich archaeological heritage, many questions remained. Were the people buried in these sites descendants of the Avar conquerors or of the previous population that was integrated into the Avar society? Or had these two groups long since mixed, as many expected? The analysis of two large sites south of Vienna, of 500 graves in Mödling and almost 150 in Leobersdorf, brought unexpected results.

When the researchers looked at the ancient DNA extracted from the human remains from these neighbouring sites, they were very surprised. While the population of Leobersdorf was mostly of East Asian origin, those buried in Mödling had ancestry associated with European populations. “The genetic difference between these groups was very clear and consistent for most individuals at the sites,” says Ke Wang, a geneticist and one of the lead authors of the study.

Before genetic analysis, no large difference between the sites had been observed. The archaeological remains of the two communities and their way of life were very similar. "The cultural integration apparently worked despite major genetic differences, and these people were obviously regarded as Avars," says Walter Pohl from the Austrian Academy of Sciences, a historian and one of the senior authors of the study.

Peaceful coexistence

The historical records agree with the evidence from anthropology and archaeology that this was one of the most peaceful times in the history of the Vienna Basin, in spite of the reputation of the Avars as warriors. "We find no battle injuries on the skeletons and there are hardly any signs of deficiencies," explains Doris Pany-Kucera, anthropologist at the Natural History Museum Vienna and one of the lead authors of the study. Also, weapons were only occasionally placed in the graves.

Thanks to the sampling strategy and highly sensitive genetic analysis, it was possible to discover a high number of relatives among the deceased. “The large number of genetic relationships between the individuals allowed us to reconstruct contemporary six-generation-long pedigrees at each site,” says Zuzana Hofmanová from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany and Masaryk University in Brno, Czechia, a geneticist and one of the senior lead authors of the study.

Only exceptionally, the individuals had no biological connection to anybody else at their burial ground. Yet, the researchers found no consanguineous relationships even between distant relatives. Interestingly, they were able to determine that almost none of the mothers had local ancestors: they must therefore have come from other regions and other communities. However, there were hardly any genetic connections between Mödling and Leobersdorf.

Both communities followed a similar social practice in choosing partners from certain other communities, through which their different ancestry was preserved: the women that became mothers in Leobersdorf apparently came from communities that also descended from East Asia (possibly from the centre of the Avar realm), while in Mödling they were of European descent. Yet they did not differ in status or wealth. "Status symbols such as belt fittings depicting griffins, and their culture and customs were the same. Most likely both considered themselves Avars," says Bendeguz Tobias, an archeologist and one of the lead authors of the study.

Such large studies that systematically investigate burial grounds are still rare in the field. “Mödling burial ground is one of the largest ever analyzed genetically, and such results hold a lot of potential for future research in various disciplines,” says Johannes Krause, director at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology and one of the senior authors of the study.

Coat clasp with glass inlay - an Avar-period artefact that is typically associated with higher social status of women as well as higher biological connectivity as revealed by ancient DNA.

Credit

© Benedict Seidl, benedicts.1995@gmail.com

 

MEXICO: How animals, people, and rituals created Teotihuacán



Discovery of nearly 200 animals remains is among the most abundant mass cases of animal sacrifices found in ancient metropolis




University of California - Riverside

Teotihuacan, Mexico 

image: 

Nawa Sugiyama, assistant professor with the Department of Anthropology at the University of California, Riverside, is co-director of Project Plaza of the Columns Complex at the UNESCO world heritage site of Teotihuacán. She recently published the book, “Animal Matter: Ritual, Place, and Sovereignty at the Moon Pyramid of Teotihuacan.”

view more 

Credit: UC Riverside




The remains of nearly 200 animals found in Mexico’s Teotihuacán are helping reconstruct history.

The unearthing and significance of these remains, found in four chambers within the Moon Pyramid — dating back nearly 2,000 years — are central in Nawa Sugiyama’s new book, “Animal Matter: Ritual, Place, and Sovereignty at the Moon Pyramid of Teotihuacan,” published by Oxford University Press. 

Teotihuacán, one of the first megacities of the Western Hemisphere and now a UNESCO World Heritage site, is situated about 30 miles northeast of Mexico City. It is home to one of the most important ceremonial landscapes in Mesoamerica and was once the most influential metropolis in the region. Nearly 2,000 years later, Sugiyama, an assistant professor of anthropology at UC Riverside, joined the team that uncovered four dedicatory chambers with nearly 200 animal remains. 

In the largest chamber, measuring approximately 16-feet by 14-feet and known as burial 6, the team found 12 human remains along with over 100 animals, including 33 complete animal remains. This is believed to be one of the most abundant cases of mass animal sacrifice ever found in Teotihuacán and comparable only to those conducted by the Aztec empire over 1000 years later. 

Animals were major protagonists in Teotihuacán since they were gifted, sacrificed, or venerated, Sugiyama said. Most were apex predators, meaning top predators within the food chain.

“That’s really interesting from the zooarchaeology standpoint because there’s a fundamental shift in the ways we know Indigenous communities understood these potent apex predators as active agents and mediators of the sky realm, the earth, and the underworld,” Sugiyama said. “They were also in conversation with and interacting, sometimes in very dangerous ways, with the human communities that were trying to make connections to — and have power over —these natural sources of power themselves.”

Studying the bones using multi-archaeometric methodologies, including zooarchaeology and isotopes (bone chemistry), Sugiyama uncovered many details of these animal’s lives, including sex, diet, age, and whether they were sacrificed dead or alive. One common denominator she found in their diet was maize, or corn; in addition to maize serving as the primary staple food in Mesoamerica, many civilizations believed humans were created from maize and the crop served an important process in cultural and religious practices.   

“I don’t think it’s a mere coincidence, they were part of that process of creating a new politics, a new landscape, in which animals and humans coordinated one of the most ambitious ceremonial landscape constructions in ancient Mesoamerica,” Sugiyama said. 

Analyzing animal matter has allowed Sugiyama to recreate parts of the lives of animals such as golden eagles, Mexican gray wolves, hawks, owls, and falcons. The team also found evidence of jaguars, pumas, wolves, and rattlesnakes. 

Burial 6, the largest dedicatory chamber found, must have once been a “State spectacle,” witnessed by thousands of people, Sugiyama said. Sacrifices were government-sanctioned ritual performances staged at the heart of the Moon Pyramid. Teotihuacán thrived between 100 B.C. and 650 A.D., more than 1,000 years before the eminent Aztec civilization settled in. At its height, 100,000 people inhabited the metropolis.    

One of the stories lifted from the soils of ancient Teotihuacán is the importance of the golden eagle, an animal still held in high regard today. 

Sugiyama’s unearthing of 18 golden eagles in burial 6, representing one for each of the 18 months in Teotihuacán’s 365-day calendar, allows her to reimagine what the dedicatory ceremony would have looked like nearly 2,000 years ago. Sugiyama suggests the birds were carried by State officials on their forearm or shoulder (or some in captivity) through Teotihuacán’s main corridor leading to the endpoint, the Moon Pyramid, known as the Calzada de los Muertos or Avenue of the Dead. 

Today, golden eagles are still incorporated in national customs, such as the annual Mexican Independence Parade when a Mexican cadet parades to the city’s federal building, known as Zócalo, with a golden eagle standing on his forearm. 

“We are able to see the matter in which ancient Teotihuacanos materialized, felt, heard, created space, and understood their cosmos directly through the messages that are provided to us archeologists through the material remains of the bones that are speaking to us 2,000 years later,” Sugiyama said.

More on Nawa Sugiyama’s summer excavation work in Teotihuacán (story, photos, and video). 

Cavity-nesting birds decorate with snake skin to deter predators




Cornell University




ITHACA, N.Y. – When a bird drapes its nest with snake skin, it isn’t just making an interesting décor choice. Cornell University researchers find that for some birds, it keeps predators at bay.

Scientists combined new and historical data to show birds that nest in cavities – covered nests with small openings – are more likely to use shed snake skins in their construction than birds that build open-cup nests, and this practice helps deter predators from eating the eggs.

“What do snakes eat? They eat a lot of mice and small mammals,” said Vanya Rohwer, senior researcher and lead author of the paper published in the journal The American Naturalist.

“We think that an evolutionary history of harmful interactions between small-bodied predators of birds that are often eaten by snakes should make these predators afraid of snake skin inside of a nest,” Rohwer said. “It might change their decision-making process of whether or not they’re going to go into a nest.”

Birdwatchers have documented the use of snake skins in nests for centuries and speculated that it occurs more in cavity nests, but no one had tested this theory, said Rohwer.

To test what benefit birds might be getting out of the snake skin, the researchers explored if snake skin could reduce nest predation, reduce harmful nest ectoparasites, change microbial communities in ways that benefit birds or function as a signal of parental quality and increase the effort parents make in raising their young. Of these ideas, their results supported the nest predation hypothesis, but only in cavity nests.

For this experiment, the researchers placed two quail eggs inside more than 60 nest boxes and 80 inactive American robin nests placed around the Monkey Run Natural Area in Ithaca to simulate cavity and open-cup nests. Some nests received snake skins collected from a local snake breeder, and others did not.

Every three days for two weeks, researchers carried a ladder through Monkey Run to climb up to the nests and check on the eggs.

Trail cameras revealed that small mammals and avian nest predators visited open-cup nests, while only small mammals – namely flying squirrels – visited the nest boxes.

“If you were in one of those nest boxes and you had snake skin, you had a much higher chance of surviving that 14-day period,” Rohwer said. “The benefits of the material are most strongly expressed in cavity nests.”

For additional information, read this Cornell Chronicle story.

-30-

New study provides insight into how some species thrive in dark, oxygen-free environments


New research on single-celled organisms sheds light on deep-sea energy sources


Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

Working at depth 

image: 

At depth, the team utilized modified push cores, or injector cores, to infuse a portion of the samples with a preservative (visible with red dye). These were then brought to the surface for gene-expression analyses to determine their metabolic pathways.

view more 

Credit: Ocean Exploration Trust, NOAA Ocean Exploration, and NASA




Woods Hole, Mass. (Jan. 16, 2025) – Most life on Earth relies on the sun’s energy for survival, but what about organisms in the deep sea that live beyond the reach of its rays? A new study led by Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), published in The ISME Journal, sheds light on how a species of foraminifera, single-celled organisms found in almost all marine habitats, thrives in a dark, oxygen-free environment.

For this foraminifera species, the answer is chemoautotrophy, a metabolic process that utilizes inorganic energy sources, perhaps sulfide, to take up carbon, enabling it to survive in oxygen-free environments. Chemoautotrophy has been observed within Bacteria and Archaea, which are microbial organisms without a true nucleus. However, foraminifera are eukaryotes, meaning they have a well-defined nucleus, which houses an organism's genetic material.

“Animals, plants, seaweed, and foraminifera are all eukaryotes. We were interested in studying this foraminifera because it thrives in a very similar environment to Earth during the Precambrian, a time before the evolution of animals,” explained Fatma Gomaa, a research associate in WHOI’s Geology & Geophysics Department. “During that time, there was very little to no available oxygen in the oceans and higher concentrations of toxic inorganic compounds; conditions similar to some modern environments found on the seafloor, especially within sediments. Understanding the energy and carbon sources used by this foraminifer helps us to answer questions on how these species adapt to environmental changes while advancing our knowledge on the evolution of eukaryotic life on Earth.”

Using the remotely operated vehicle Hercules from the exploration vessel E/V Nautilus, operated by the Ocean Exploration Trust, the team collected sediments containing foraminifera about 570 meters (1,870 feet) below the ocean surface, off the coast of California. At depth, the team utilized two main methods to learn about the life strategies of the foraminifera. The first included infusing samples with a preservative (visible with red dye), preserving the foraminifera in situ. The researchers assessed their use of different metabolic pathways using gene expression analyses. Additionally, researchers used in situ incubations with an isotopic carbon tracer, a technique that allows tracking of labeled metabolites through chemical reactions. These incubations were kept on the seafloor for approximately 24 hours before being recovered and subsampled in red light.

“When we analyzed the seafloor tracer incubations, we could see that the tracer moved from the water and was associated with the foraminifera biomass. This gave us an idea of where these organisms were getting their carbon,” said Daniel Rogers, an associate professor of chemistry and department chair at Stonehill College. “It was important for us to make these observations at depth, where these organisms are in their natural state. By bringing them to the surface, we expose them to light, increase the temperature of their environment, and change the amount of pressure they’re under. This in situ approach gives us a more accurate depiction of how these organisms survive in such harsh environments.”

This study was funded by NASA, which is interested in the possibility of life on other planets and how it might survive. While the deep sea couldn’t be further from extraterrestrial planets, both environments share similarities such as cold temperatures, darkness, and in many locations, no oxygen. Joan Bernhard, a senior scientist in WHOI’s Geology & Geophysics Department and foraminifera expert, has been studying this population of benthic foraminifera for decades to learn how these fascinating creatures survive in this challenging environment and have done so throughout a large portion of Earth history.

“Foraminifera are extremely abundant on earth. Most are only about 300 microns in diameter, so rather small. In a volume as small as a pencil eraser, there could be about 500 of this particular species in this dark, oxygen-free and sulfidic habitat.” Bernhard explained. “This species takes up unrelated organism’s chloroplasts—organelles that perform photosynthesis if exposed to sunlight. This process is called kleptoplasty, in which an organism steals chloroplasts from another type of organism, even though these foraminifera are never exposed to sunlight. We know kleptoplasty is happening here, but we needed more research to understand why this foraminifer is so successful in the dark, without oxygen.”

Aside from their ability to thrive in what some consider to be an extreme habitat; the shells of foraminifera are also used in climate-change studies and for searching for hydrocarbon reserves. “We have fossil records of foraminifera dating back over half a billion years, which means we have a longer record of this group than most other life on Earth,” Bernhard continued. “By studying these fossils, we can see how their shells have responded to changes in the environment, like temperature, salinity, pH, or oxygen. By studying the geochemistry preserved in their shells, foraminifera are excellent tools for showing the age and environment of a geologic deposit. All of this information is essential for building accurate climate records. The fact that a foraminifera species is chemoautotrophic raises questions about their geochemical records and whether we are interpreting them correctly. Other foraminifera species may also be performing this way.”

Researchers also preserved specimens of two other foraminifera species and initial results suggest these types differ biologically. Scientists are presently conducting comparable analyses on these other species to pinpoint their energy and carbon sources.

About Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

The Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) is a private, non-profit organization on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, dedicated to marine research, engineering, and higher education. Established in 1930, its primary mission is to understand the ocean and its interaction with the Earth as a whole and to communicate an understanding of the ocean’s role in the changing global environment. WHOI’s pioneering discoveries stem from an ideal combination of science and engineering—one that has made it one of the most trusted and technically advanced leaders in basic and applied ocean research and exploration anywhere. WHOI is known for its multidisciplinary approach, superior ship operations, and unparalleled deep-sea robotics capabilities. We play a leading role in ocean observation and operate the most extensive suite of data-gathering platforms in the world. Top scientists, engineers, and students collaborate on more than 800 concurrent projects worldwide—both above and below the waves—pushing the boundaries of knowledge and possibility. For more information, please visit www.whoi.edu

The all-female watch team is directing and recording ROV Hercules operations at Santa Barbara Basin. The ROV aided in the collection of sediments containing foraminifera about 570 meters (1,870 feet) below the ocean surface.

Credit

Ocean Exploration Trust, NOAA Ocean Exploration, and NASA