Friday, February 21, 2025

 

A new method combining peridynamics and deep learning for improving land subsidence modeling and simulation





Beijing Zhongke Journal Publising Co. Ltd.

Flowchart of the land subsidence modeling and simulation combining peridynamics and deep learning 

image: 

Based on using peridynamics to describe the physical processes of regional land subsidence, deep learning methods, including neural networks and Gaussian Process Regression, are employed to construct various boundary conditions that adapt to temporal developments and changes. This approach enables the optimization of boundary conditions within the peridynamics-based land subsidence model.

view more 

Credit: Beijing Zhongke Journal Publising Co. Ltd.




Land subsidence is a geological disaster that occurs when natural factors or human engineering activities cause the consolidation and compression of loose underground rock formations, resulting in a drop in ground elevation over a certain area. Currently, the problem of land subsidence is getting more serious. Its complexity, harm, and uncertainty are on the rise, affecting over 150 countries and regions globally. Modeling, simulating, and predicting land subsidence is of utmost importance for the sustainable development of the regional resource - environment and social economy.

As a new physical model method in the research of land subsidence, peridynamics builds models based on the idea of non-local interaction and can be used to study the deformation, damage, and fracture of homogeneous and inhomogeneous targets. Existing research has shown that peridynamics has good applicability in land subsidence modeling. Considering that physical models and deep learning can complement each other very well, their integration is a promising approach to further improve the simulation and prediction of land subsidence.

Recently, a study in the Journal of Geo-information Science brought good news. A research team from Capital Normal University, led by Professor Huili Gong and Professor Xiaojuan Li, proposed an innovative method. By combining peridynamics and deep learning, they aimed to enhance the accuracy of ground subsidence simulation. The research focused on Tongzhou District in Beijing, which has long been troubled by land subsidence. The team analyzed data from September 2021 to May 2023, dividing it into training and test sets. Results indicated that for the combined model, the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) was 6.25 mm for the training set and 7.71 mm for the test set. Compared with traditional methods, the errors were reduced by 72.37% and 65.92% respectively.

This research highlights the complementary strengths of physical models and deep learning. Peridynamics provides a solid framework for understanding land subsidence's physical processes, while deep learning improves the model's ability to handle complex and dynamic boundary conditions. Their combination offers a more effective way to simulate land subsidence in areas with complex geological structures. The study's results are significant for urban planning, disaster prevention, and mitigation, especially in areas prone to land subsidence, and can strongly support the safe development of cities.

For more details, please refer to the original article:
Cheng S Y, Guan Z B, Gong H L, Li X J*, et al. Land subsidence modeling and simulation methods using peridynamics and deep learning[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2025, 27(1): 181-192https://www.dqxxkx.cn/CN/10.12082/dqxxkx.2025.240506

https://www.sciengine.com/JGIS/doi/10.12082/dqxxkx.2025.240506(If you want to read the English version of the full text, please click on the “iFLYTEK Translation” in the article pages.)

 

Clues of advanced ancient technology found in the Philippines and Island Southeast Asia

Peer-Reviewed Publication

Ateneo de Manila University

Rope making is an ancient skill 

image: 

New archaeological evidence suggests that ancient inhabitants of the Philippines and Island Southeast Asia had the advanced plant-working technology needed for sophisticated boat building and open-sea fishing.

view more 

Credit: Alfred Pawlik

The ancient peoples of the Philippines and of Island Southeast Asia (ISEA) may have built sophisticated boats and mastered seafaring tens of thousands of years ago—millennia before Magellan, Zheng He, and even the Polynesians.

In a new paper coming out in the April 2025 issue of the Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, Ateneo de Manila University researchers Riczar Fuentes and Alfred Pawlik challenge the widely-held contention that technological progress during the Paleolithic only emerged in Europe and Africa.

They point out that much of ISEA was never connected to mainland Asia, neither by land bridges nor by ice sheets, yet it has yielded evidence of early human habitation. Exactly how these peoples achieved such daring ocean crossings is an enduring mystery, as organic materials like wood and fiber used for boats rarely survive in the archaeological record. But archaeological sites in the Philippines, Indonesia, and Timor-Leste are now providing strong evidence that ancient seafarers had a technological sophistication comparable to much later civilizations.

Microscopic analysis of stone tools excavated at these sites, dating as far back as some 40,000 years ago, showed clear traces of plant processing—particularly the extraction of fibers necessary for making ropes, nets, and bindings essential for boatbuilding and open-sea fishing. Archaeological sites in Mindoro and Timor-Leste also yielded the remains of deep ocean fish such as tuna and sharks as well as fishing implements such as fishing hooks, gorges, and net weights. 

“The remains of large predatory pelagic fish in these sites indicate the capacity for advanced seafaring and knowledge of the seasonality and migration routes of those fish species,” the researchers said in their paper. Meanwhile, the discovery of fishing implements “indicates the need for strong and well-crafted cordage for ropes and fishing lines to catch the marine fauna.” 

This body of evidence points to the likelihood that these ancient seafarers built sophisticated boats out of organic composite materials held together with plant-based ropes and also used the same rope technology for open-sea fishing. If so, then prehistoric migrations across ISEA were not undertaken by mere passive sea drifters on flimsy bamboo rafts but by highly skilled navigators equipped with the knowledge and technology to travel vast distances and to remote islands over deep waters.  

Several years of fieldwork in Ilin Island, Occidental Mindoro, inspired the researchers to think of this topic and to test this hypothesis. Together with naval architects from the University of Cebu, they recently started the First Long-Distance Open-Sea Watercrafts (FLOW) Project, supported by a research grant from the Ateneo de Manila University, with the aim of testing raw materials that were probably used in the past, and to design and test scaled-down seacraft models. 

The presence of such advanced maritime technology in prehistoric ISEA highlights the ingenuity of early Philippine peoples and their neighbors, whose boat-building knowledge likely made the region a center for technological innovations tens of thousands of years ago and laid the foundations for the maritime traditions that still thrive in the region today. 

  

Evidence of plant-working technology in ancient human habitations across Island Southeast Asia suggests that the prehistoric peoples of the Philippines and their neighbors possessed both sophisticated seacraft and advanced nautical skills.

Credit

Riczar Fuentes and Alfred Pawlik

 

Council of Nicaea 1700 years ago: ‘Images of God turned upside down’



Cluster of Excellence "Religion and Politics"
Michael Seewald, Professor of Dogmatics and the History of Dogma at the Faculty of Catholic Theology at the University of Münster, and speaker of the Cluster of Excellence ‘Religion and Politics’ 

image: 

Michael Seewald, Professor of Dogmatics and the History of Dogma at the Faculty of Catholic Theology at the University of Münster, and speaker of the Cluster of Excellence ‘Religion and Politics’

view more 

Credit: Cluster of Excellence ‘Religion and Politics’



Organised by the Pontifical Gregorian University and the University of Münster, an international conference will take place in Rome next week that focuses on the Council of Nicaea 1700 years ago and its significance today. ‘The first ecumenical council in history formulated a creed that is still fundamental for almost all churches today. It unites Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox Christians’, says Michael Seewald, Professor of Dogmatics and the History of Dogma from Münster, who is organising the interdisciplinary conference with his colleague Philipp G. Renczes SJ from the Gregorian University. ‘From today’s perspective, the Council turned conventional images of God upside down: God himself became human in Jesus. That is the main message of the Nicene Creed. Figuratively speaking, God is not only at the very top, but also at the very bottom. As a crucified human, a failed existence – and precisely in his failure does he prove himself to be God. This basic idea from Nicaea left theology intellectually challenging questions’. Because the 1700-year-old Creed is still significant today, the conference will bring together new historical research on the Council as a political event, as well as new research from systematic theology on the dispute over the relationship between God and Jesus. The dispute divided the fledgling Christian church in the Roman empire, which is why Emperor Constantine convened the largest assembly of bishops to date in Nicaea, today Iznik in Turkey, in 325.

The two-part conference is entitled ‘The Confession of the Council of Nicaea: History and Theology’. Leading scholars on Nicaea from the fields of theology, philosophy, philology and history will speak in the first part, from 27 February to 1 March in Rome. The focus of the second part, from 15 to 17 October 2025 in Münster, will be on the question of what the Council means for the relationship between Christianity and Judaism, and Christianity and Islam. ‘Nicaea further separated Jews and Christians. And the idea that Jesus is God is unacceptable from an Islamic point of view. The two parts of the conference in Rome and Münster will contextualise the council as a political event of its time, but also reflect on the controversial matters that were discussed in Nicaea’, explains Seewald.

‘Restrengthening German-Italian theological exchange’

Commenting on the cooperation between the Gregorian University, which is run by the Society of Jesus, and the Faculty of Theology at the University of Münster, Seewald says: ‘It is gratifying that this tandem is reviving the exchange between German-speaking and Italian theology. The fact that the Pope has invited the conference participants to a personal meeting and discussion speaks to the importance that he attaches to the anniversary of the Council, but also to the conference with the high quality of its participants. We hope very much of course that the Pope will regain his health soon’. Seewald highlights the fact that both university institutions have a long tradition in the history of theology, while also dealing with contemporary issues of the Christian faith in different regional, linguistic and cultural contexts. ‘Both look beyond their own confessional and national borders’. The Gregorian is world-renowned for Catholic theology, while the Catholic Faculty of Theology in Münster is the largest theological faculty at a state university in the world.

‘What today’s church members actually believe is another matter’

The Council of Nicaea in 325 sought to establish a binding creed to settle the dispute that had escalated in the Roman empire over the relationship between God and Jesus, and to bring about unity. As Michael Seewald explains, the assembly finally decided that ‘Jesus Christ is of the same substance as God the Father, that is, in the full sense God – not just originating diffusely from the sphere of the divine’. Referred to as the ‘ecumenical’ council, it thus concerned ‘the entire inhabited world’. However, most of the participants were bishops from the Greek-speaking East. ‘Theologically, that is where the action was in the 4th century’.

As for the significance of the Council for people today, Seewald says: ‘The major Christian churches all recognise the Nicene Creed, with some later additions. What the members of these churches actually believe is another matter. Most believers today probably cannot be mapped onto the theological landscape of the 4th century’. While the conflicting groups at the time agreed that Jesus Christ ‘was not simply a human being’, many Christians today probably think that ‘Jesus was a remarkable man who was deified in perhaps an exaggerated way only retrospectively’. This only took hold in Christian theology in the 18th century. ‘By contrast, the theology of the ancient church cultivated a highly developed speculative Christology’. The Council could be of interest for non-Christians today for another reason: ‘The varied reception of Nicaea and the role of Emperor Constantine at the Council are a prime example of the interconnection between religion and politics, of the interweaving of religious claims to truth and political interests’.

Responsible for organising the multilingual, simultaneously interpreted conference at the University of Münster is the Chair of Dogmatics and the History of Dogma and the Cluster of Excellence ‘Religion and Politics’. The two organisers will be speaking in the first part in Rome, alongside the philosopher Anna Marmodoro from Missouri, a world-renowned expert in ancient metaphysics, the philologist Young Richard Kim from Chicago, a specialist in Greek studies and editor of the Cambridge Companion to the Council of Nicaea, and the Italian historian Emanuela Prinzivalli. (vvm/tec)

 

Poster of the conference 'The Confession of the Council of Nicaea: History and Theology' (IMAGE)

Cluster of Excellence "Religion and Politics"



Programme for the two-part international conference ‘The Confession of the Council of Nicaea: History and Theology’

Part I 27 February to 1 March 2025 in Rome, Part II 15 to 17 October 2025 in Münster

https://www.unigre.it/it/eventi-e-comunicazione/eventi/calendario-eventi/the-confession-of-the-council-of-nicea-history-and-theology/pogramma/

https://www.uni-muenster.de/imperia/md/content/religion_und_politik/aktuelles/001-09-40_programm_theconfessionof_digital.pdf

Registration: Journalists interested in attending are kindly requested to register at: religionundpolitik@uni-muenster.de

 

Forensic Sciences Research Volume 9, Issue 4 publishes



Compuscript Ltd
fig 1 

image: 

Dr Carolyne Bird

 

 

view more 

Credit: FSR






https://academic.oup.com/fsr/issue/9/4

Special Issue: Forensic Document Examination

 

This special issue includes an editorial, two review, three research articles and one rapid communication from leading scientists in the field that further the discussion on forensic document examination. Video introductions to the issue by the Guest Editors are available to view at https://youtu.be/cJ1I4E2kfi4 and https://youtu.be/evXCudzoXzw

 

Guest Editors: Carolyne Bird from Forensic Science SA, Adelaide, Australia and Xu Yang of the Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China.

 

This special issue showcases research and commentary across a range of forensic document examinations and topics, demonstrating the continued relevance and shifting focus of the field.

The contributions have been made by experts hailing from North America, South America, Europe, and Asia, providing a global snapshot. These articles focus on the frontier issues of handwriting and questioned document examination and contribute fruitful research to the discipline.

 

This special issue of Forensic Sciences Research showcases the work of FDEs worldwide, providing readers with new information and ideas while fostering a stronger sense of community.

 

Articles published in the issue include:

 

Editorial

Forensic document examination: a global snapshot

https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owaf001

Carolyne Lindsay Bird and Xu Yang

 

Review Articles

Error mitigation in forensic handwriting examination: the examiner’s perspective

https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owae065

Nicole Crown, Raymond Marquis, Erich Kupferschmid, Tomasz Dziedzic, Diana Belic, and Dorijan Kerzan

 

I have a question about evaluative reporting: a comprehensive collection of FAQs

https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owae062

Ronald Brent Ostrum

 

Original Articles

Characterizing pen strokes produced using various commercially available thermochromic inks

https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owae055

Mario Alejandro Alvarez Cordeiro, and Catalina Gondikas

 

An experimental study on distinguishing gel pen ink stains using desorption electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy combined with the K-means algorithm

https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owae066

Yiting Yuan, Yu Tao, and Da Qin

 

Dynamic signatures: a mathematical approach to analysis

https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owae067

Jessica Baleiro Okado, Erick Simões da Camara e Silva, and Priscila Dias Sily

 

Rapid Communication

Succeeding together: the power of collaboration between forensic and criminal intelligence

https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owae054

Maralee Tapps, Ozalée Piat, Audrey-Anne Matte, and Romain Volery

 

Guest Editor Biographies

Carolyne Bird is a practicing forensic document examiner at Forensic Science SA, in Adelaide, Australia, where she commenced employment in 2002. She has a Doctor of Philosophy in Human Bioscience from La Trobe University, Melbourne where her work investigated forensic handwriting examiners' skill in determining disguised and simulated handwriting. She has been involved in several national and international working groups in the areas of education and training, validation, capability mapping and human factors in handwriting examination. Carolyne is the current Vice President of the Australasian Society of Forensic Document Examiners, Inc. She has co-authored twelve peer-reviewed journal articles and authored three book chapter on aspects of forensic document examination.

Xu Yang, is the Vice President of Academy of Forensic Science, China. He has been engaged in scientific research, appraisal, and educational training in the field of forensic science, including material evidence technology. He has presided over or participated in more than 30 national and provincial scientific research projects, presided over or participated in the development of 8 national standards for document examination, and developed more than 20 technical specifications issued by the Ministry of Justice. He has published more than 60 papers and has been the chief editor or co-editor of nearly 20 monographs. He has presided over and participated in projects that have won four Second Prizes for Shanghai Science and Technology Progress. In 2009, he was awarded the title of the First National Advanced Individual in Judicial Appraisal by the Ministry of Justice.

 

# # # # # #

Forensic Sciences Research (FSR) is a publication of the Academy of Forensic Science (AFS), Shanghai, P.R. China, that publishes the latest research in various disciplines of forensic sciences. It aims to promote forensic sciences through quality research articles, reviews, case reports, and letters to editors. The journal has been publishing highly impactful articles and achieving a 1.4 Impact Factor and 3.6 CiteScore (Scopus) while averaging 11 days from submission to first decision. Forensic Sciences Research is indexed in by ESCI, PMC, Scopus, DOAJ, ProQuest, HeinOnline and CSCD.

 

For more information, please visit https://academic.oup.com/fsr

Editorial Board: https://academic.oup.com/fsr/pages/editorial-board

Forensic Sciences Research is available online at https://academic.oup.com/fsr/issue

 

Submissions to Forensic Sciences Research may be made using Editorial Manager® (https://www.editorialmanager.com/tfsr/default.aspx).

 

Usage

263K annual downloads/views

 

Citation metrics

1.4 (2023) Impact Factor

4.7 (2022) CiteScore (Scopus)

Q1 (2022) CiteScore Best Quartile

1.767 (2021) SNIP

0.894 (2021) SJR

 

Speed/acceptance

11 days avg. from submission to first decision

37 days avg. from submission to first post-review decision

74 days avg. from acceptance to online publication

39% acceptance rate

 

Print ISSN: 2096-1790

Online ISSN: 2471-1411