Tuesday, September 15, 2026

 

Just three minutes with miniature horses and donkeys improved teens’ mood



Adolescents who read the equines’ body language were less sad and lonely




University of California - Davis

Professor Rebecca Calisi Rodriguez with mini horse

image: 

UC Davis Associate Professor Rebecca Calisi Rodríguez smiles in the sunshine while standing behind Randy, a miniature horse who was part of a study about human-animal interactions and mental health.

view more 

Credit: Gregory Urquiaga/UC Davis





Interacting with animals can make people feel calmer and less lonely and anxious. A new study from the University of California, Davis, shows that animals play an active role in shaping these interactions and their outcomes. 

Spending just three minutes with miniature horses and donkeys improved the mood of adolescents. Teens who picked up on the equines’ body language cues showed bigger reductions in loneliness and sadness — even if those cues involved the animal walking away. The study’s results, published in Scientific Reports, provide a new framework for improving animal-assisted interventions for both people and animals.

“Our work raises this beautiful possibility that making the interaction better for the animal may be part of what makes it better for us,” said Rebecca Calisi Rodríguez, associate professor of neurobiology, physiology and behavior and director of the Green Care Lab at UC Davis. “This has the potential to change how we think about designing animal-assisted interventions, from hospitals and schools to therapeutic riding centers and beyond.”

Investigating both sides of human-animal interactions  

Most previous studies of animal-assisted interventions have zeroed in on their benefits to humans while treating the animals as passive participants. 

“You can't stand in a pasture watching a child and a donkey interact and pretend only one of them is having an experience,” said Calisi Rodríguez. “They're watching each other, they're responding to each other, they're both making choices. That realization became the heart of my work and the heart of this paper.”

Coauthor Claire Short, who designed the study, began working with Calisi Rodríguez as an undergraduate student and now manages the Green Care Lab.

“I noticed that the mini equines in our lab would react differently depending on how I pet them, and that it made me feel good to make them feel good,” Short said. “Then when I was reading papers on animal-assisted interventions, I saw that the results weren’t very consistent. I wondered if that was partly because different people interacted with the animals in different ways.”

To understand how reciprocity shapes human-animal interactions, the researchers analyzed interactions between 61 teenagers and a small herd of rescued miniature horses and donkeys. Each adolescent spent three minutes with the herd, which consisted of two miniature horses named Olivia and Randy and two miniature donkeys named Mary and Memphis.

Half of the adolescents were instructed to gently stroke the animals’ backs, whereas the other half were told to vigorously scratch their necks in a way that mimics how equines groom each other. The teens were also taught to recognize two equine behavioral cues: lip-wriggling, which indicates pleasure or enjoyment, and walking away, which indicates that the animal wants some space. 

Equines unanimously vote: Neck scratches beat petting

Based on the adolescent’s reports, the horses and donkeys wriggled their lips during 75% of neck-scratching interactions, versus a 48% lip-wriggling rate for petting interactions. Conversely, the equines walked away during 89% of petting interactions versus 42% of neck-scratching interactions.

All of the teens reported increased calmness and lower levels of nervousness, sadness, loneliness and excitement, regardless of whether they were assigned to pet or scratch the animals. However, participants who observed lip-wriggling showed bigger decreases in loneliness, and — surprisingly — adolescents who observed equines walking away from them showed bigger reductions in sadness.

“I love that this unexpected result challenges the assumption that more animal engagement is always better,” said Calisi Rodríguez. “A meaningful interaction may not require an animal to engage with us continuously. Seeing an animal exercise choice — being free to approach you, stay with you, or walk away — may make the interaction feel more authentic.”

A framework for improving animal-assisted interventions

“This really isn't a story about the best way to pet a donkey, as cute as that would be. It's a story about reciprocity,” said Calisi Rodríguez. “If animals are going to become increasingly important partners in supporting human well-being, then understanding their well-being isn't just an ethical responsibility. Our work suggests it may actually be part of understanding how these interventions work.”

By revealing that human interaction style influences animal behavior, which in turn influences human emotions, these findings could help design better animal-assisted interventions.

“Ultimately, what we want to know is whether we can predict the conditions under which an interaction is beneficial for both species,” said Calisi Rodríguez. “I would love to see animal-assisted programs become places where people don't just receive care from animals but learn how to give care back.”

The study was funded by academic enrichment funds from UC Davis.

 

Cardiovascular disease tops cancer as leading cause of death among Hispanic adults in U.S.



Hispanic adults face unique cardiovascular health challenges that require culturally relevant prevention and care strategies, according to a new American Heart Association scientific statement




American Heart Association





Statement Highlights:

  • Cardiovascular disease has replaced cancer as the leading cause of death among Hispanic adults in the U.S., according to a new scientific statement from the American Heart Association.
  • Hispanic people experience health risk factors at younger ages than other populations and they face many social conditions that influence health, including access to care, language services, healthy foods and safe places to be physically active.
  • The statement highlights the urgent need for culturally relevant prevention strategies, equitable access to care and greater representation of Hispanic populations in cardiovascular research.


DALLAS, Sept. 15, 2026 — Cardiovascular disease has surpassed cancer as the leading cause of death among Hispanic adults in the U.S., driven by rising rates of obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure and other risk factors that often begin earlier in life for Hispanic people. A new scientific statement from the American Heart Association reveals how social, economic cultural and environmental factors contribute to persistent disparities in cardiovascular health and calls for culturally tailored prevention strategies, equitable access to care and greater representation of Hispanic populations in cardiovascular research. The statement is published today in the Association's flagship journal, Circulation.

Hispanic people represent nearly 1 in 5 of the U.S. population and are the nation's largest ethnic minority group, yet many continue to face barriers to achieving heart health and accessing high quality healthcare. The statement also highlights important differences among Hispanic populations, including those born in the U.S. versus other countries and even among specific Hispanic heritage backgrounds, including those of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Dominican, Central American and South American descent.

That’s why the chair of the scientific statement’s volunteer writing group, Johanna Contreras, M.D., M.Sc., FAHA, cautions that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to heart health for Hispanic communities.

“Hispanic populations in the U.S. are incredibly diverse even within their own communities with differences in genetic ancestry, language, cultural traditions and social experiences that can significantly influence cardiovascular health,” said Contreras, who is the director of the Division of Heart Failure and medical director of the Hispanic Heart Center within the Mount Sinai Health System in New York. “Yet Hispanic people remain underrepresented overall in the research that guides prevention and treatment strategies. More detailed data collection and reporting across Hispanic heritage backgrounds will be essential to better understand community-specific risks, strengths and healthcare needs. Without better representation and more detailed data, we risk overlooking important differences that can help us improve care and save lives.”

Hispanic cardiovascular health by the numbers

Cardiovascular risk factors are highly prevalent among Hispanic adults and often emerge at younger ages and occur more frequently among Hispanic adults compared with white adults.

  • Nearly 46% of Hispanic adults have obesity, with the highest rates reported among Puerto Rican and Dominican heritage groups.
  • Type 2 diabetes affects 15.5% of Hispanic adults, nearly twice the prevalence among white adults. Prevalence is highest among Mexican and Puerto Rican individuals.
  • About 44% of Hispanic adults have high blood pressure, yet awareness, treatment and control rates remain lower than among white adults. The highest prevalence is observed among Puerto Rican, Cuban and Dominican individuals.

This high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors drives increased cardiovascular disease among Hispanic adults, often occurring at younger ages. Disparities exist between Hispanic adults and white adults, and between U.S.-born and foreign-born Hispanic individuals.

  • Hispanic adults are diagnosed with heart failure about 8 to 9 years younger than white adults.
  • Hispanic adults, on average, experience a first stroke about 6 to 8 years younger — 67 years old compared to 73 to 75 years old among white adults.
  • U.S.-born Hispanic adults have shorter life expectancy and higher death rates than their foreign-born counterparts, driven by high prevalence of heart disease, stroke and multiple cardiovascular disease risk factors.

According to the report, only about 1 in 5 Hispanic adults achieves ideal cardiovascular health as defined by the American Heart Association’s original Life’s Simple 7 metrics. Updated analyses using the Association’s Life's Essential 8™ framework demonstrated persistent disparities for heart and brain health.

  • Dietary quality remains a challenge. Fewer than 2% of Hispanic adults meet recommended sodium intake goals, and fewer than 10% meet recommendations for healthy fats. Increased intake of ultraprocessed foods and sugar sweetened beverages is more commonly observed among U.S.-born Hispanic adults.
  • Approximately one-third of Hispanic adults report getting less than seven hours of sleep per night, a factor linked to obesity, diabetes and high blood pressure. Short sleep duration was most prevalent among individuals of Puerto Rican background.
  • Nearly one-third of Hispanic adults report no moderate-to-vigorous leisure-time physical activity, the highest rate among all U.S. racial and ethnic groups.

Social and economic barriers matter

The writing group emphasized that biology alone does not explain cardiovascular health disparities. The environments where people live, work and age, along with social and economic challenges, can have a profound impact on heart health.

“Many Hispanic adults face obstacles that extend far beyond the doctor’s office,” Contreras said. “Limited health insurance coverage, language differences, food insecurity, environmental exposures and concerns related to immigration status can make it more difficult to prevent disease, manage chronic conditions and receive timely treatment. These challenges accumulate over time and contribute to persistent inequities in cardiovascular health.”

According to the report:

  • Approximately 17% of Hispanics live below the federal poverty threshold compared with 8.2% of white adults and they earn less at comparable education levels.
  • About 41% of all Hispanic adults and 66% of older Hispanic adults have low or limited health literacy compared with 9% of white adults. This significantly impacts how they understand medical information and work within healthcare systems to get care.
  • Approximately 20% of Hispanic adults remained uninsured in 2023, compared with 6.4% of white adults and 9.8% of Black adults. This creates significant challenges for prevention and treatment.

Contreras emphasized that the rich cultural values and practices of Hispanic people also greatly influence how they may perceive their health and healthcare options.

“Family plays a central role in many Hispanic communities and can be an extraordinary source of strength, support and resilience,” Contreras said. “At the same time, family members are often called upon to translate medical information, navigate health systems and help make healthcare decisions for loved ones. Those responsibilities can shape how health information is understood and acted upon. While trusted family and community networks are invaluable, they can also become pathways for health misinformation, making culturally relevant and accurate health communication critically important.”

An action plan for improving Hispanic health

The scientific statement provides an in-depth look at the factors shaping cardiovascular health among Hispanic populations in the U.S., from traditional risk factors to the social and structural barriers that influence health. Beyond documenting the challenges, the statement outlines practical opportunities to achieve equitable cardiovascular health and reduce disparities through community engagement, culturally responsive care, inclusive research and policies that address the underlying drivers of health.

Considerations include:

  • Trusted community partnerships in settings such as churches, markets, community centers and Spanish-language media platforms to help meet people where they live, work and play.
  • Improved access to care and tailored clinical care including culturally appropriate bilingual health education and increased use of community health workers;
  • Increased representation of Hispanic people in research studies including those using artificial intelligence and collecting more detailed data about different Hispanic heritage groups so researchers and clinicians can better understand and address unique health needs;
  • Greater attention to the social conditions and policies that shape health.

“Raising awareness about these disparities is important, but awareness without access is not enough,” Contreras said. “Reducing cardiovascular disease among Hispanic populations demands action at every level, from improving access to culturally responsive care and expanding research participation to addressing the social and environmental conditions that shape health. A person’s ZIP code, access to healthy foods, ability to communicate with healthcare providers and opportunities to be physically active can be just as important to heart health as traditional medical risk factors.”

As the Hispanic population continues to grow and age, improving cardiovascular health in these communities will be critical to the nation's overall health. The statement authors emphasize that meaningful progress will require collaboration among healthcare systems, researchers, policymakers, community organizations and families to ensure that every person has access to prevention, treatment and support that reflects their culture, language and lived experiences. By addressing both medical risk factors and the social conditions that shape health, experts believe there is an important opportunity to reduce disparities and help more people live longer, healthier lives.

This scientific statement was prepared by the volunteer writing committee on behalf of the American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Basic Cardiovascular Sciences; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; and Stroke Council. American Heart Association scientific statements promote greater awareness about cardiovascular diseases and stroke issues and help facilitate informed health care decisions. Scientific statements outline what is currently known about a topic and what areas need additional research. While scientific statements inform the development of guidelines, they do not make treatment recommendations. American Heart Association guidelines provide the Association’s official clinical practice recommendations.

Co-authors and members of the volunteer writing committee are David Aguilar, M.D., MSc., FAHA, Vice Chair; Katia Bravo-Jaimes, M.D.; Yamnia Cortes, Ph.D., M.P.H., FAHA; Salvador Cruz-Flores, M.D., FAHA; Jorge R. Kizer, M.D., M.Sc., FAHA; Ileana Piña, M.D., M.P.H., FAHA; Harrison Bonilla, M.D.; Carlos J. Rodriguez, M.D., M.P.H., FAHA; Fatima Rodriguez, M.D., FAHA; and Gladys Velarde, M.D., FAHA. Authors’ disclosures are listed in the manuscript.

The Association receives more than 85% of its revenue from sources other than corporations. These sources include contributions from individuals, foundations and estates, as well as investment earnings and revenue from the sale of our educational materials. Corporations (including pharmaceutical, device manufacturers and other companies) also make donations to the Association. The Association has strict policies to prevent any donations from influencing its science content and policy positions. Overall financial information is available here.

Additional Resources:

###

About the American Heart Association

The American Heart Association is a relentless force for a world of longer, healthier lives. Dedicated to ensuring equitable health in all communities, the organization has been a leading source of health information for more than one hundred years. Supported by more than 35 million volunteers globally, we fund groundbreaking research, advocate for the public’s health, and provide critical resources to save and improve lives affected by cardiovascular disease and stroke. By driving breakthroughs and implementing proven solutions in science, policy, and care, we work tirelessly to advance health and transform lives every day. Connect with us on heart.org, Facebook, X or by calling 1-800-AHA-USA1.

New study sheds light on dementia among Indigenous Bolivians


The Tsimané and Mosetén communities, who live pre-industrial lifestyles in the Bolivian Amazon, experience modest rates of new dementia cases but shorter survival after diagnosis compared to other populations




University of Southern California

Tsimane Health and Life History Project participant interview

image: 

Tsimane Health and Life History Project investigators interview a participant in Bolivia.

view more 

Credit: USC Professor Margaret Gatz





In two Indigenous communities living pre-industrial lifestyles in the Bolivian Amazon, dementia is remarkably uncommon. However, a new longitudinal study reveals why earlier estimates told only part of the story.

Among the Tsimané and Mosetén communities, dementia incidence, or the rate of new cases, didn’t dramatically differ from rates in U.S. and northern European populations, especially for individuals under 80 years old. Shorter survival after dementia develops appears to play a significant role in why dementia prevalence – the total proportion of people living with the disease at a given time – in the Tsimané and Mosetén populations is unusually low.

“The surprising finding was that there weren’t big differences in dementia incidence,” said lead author Margaret Gatz, a professor of psychology and gerontology at USC and a senior scientist at the USC Center for Economic and Social Research. “That challenges us to identify the risk factors for developing dementia in the Tsimané population.”

Prevalence versus incidence

The study, published in Alzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association, followed 730 adults who did not have dementia at their initial assessment and were revisited nearly five years later. Researchers identified 22 new dementia cases, an overall incidence of 7.40 cases per 1,000 person-years. At the follow-up assessments, dementia prevalence – the proportion of people living with the condition at a given time – remained below 2%.

Incidence counts new diagnoses within a given span of time, while prevalence includes everyone living with a disease, regardless of when it began. Because prevalence depends on how often a disease develops and how long people survive with it, repeated assessments revealed what a one-time snapshot could not.

Among the Tsimané and Mosetén communities, participants with dementia faced more than six times the mortality risk of those with normal cognition. Compared with U.S. studies, survival time following a dementia diagnosis appeared two to three times shorter on average.

The researchers point to the realities of life in remote communities, where families depend on members contributing to farming, hunting, fishing and food preparation. Previous research by the Tsimané Health and Life History Project (THLHP) found that the Tsimané and Mosetén experienced less brain atrophy and better cardiovascular health compared to industrialized populations in the U.S. and Europe, which at the time the authors hypothesized could be due in part to large amounts of physical activity and healthier food due to the groups’ subsistence lifestyle.

However, Gatz noted that disabilities may reduce a person’s ability to help obtain food while increasing pressure on the household. Limited medical care can also make treatable infections and other acute illnesses more deadly.

While the authors caution that 22 cases are too few to fully discern all of the factors behind low prevalence, the findings add rare incidence data to dementia research among Indigenous peoples. Some Indigenous communities report high dementia prevalence following disruptive integration into dominant societies and greater exposure to chronic disease risks. By contrast, several Indigenous and rural populations retaining subsistence lifestyles report low prevalence. The difference points to an important health-equity challenge, Gatz said.

Additional clues from biomarkers

The dementia observed in the Bolivian communities may also differ from prototypical Alzheimer’s disease. Many affected participants showed more difficulty with attention, reasoning and managing tasks than with memory, the hallmark challenge in Alzheimer’s.

Preliminary blood analyses found associations between the dementia cases and the amount of neurofilament light chain proteins in blood – a general indicator of neurodegeneration – but not with amyloid or phosphorylated tau protein profiles characteristic of Alzheimer’s. Imaging and vascular measures suggested contributions from blood-vessel disease.

“In most Tsimané with cognitive impairment or dementia, the pattern of atrophy in the brain is not typical of Alzheimer’s disease,” Gatz said. “Rather, there are changes indicative of vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia.”

The APOE e4 gene variant, the best-known genetic risk factor for Alzheimer’s, was associated with dementia in the study. However, Gatz noted that APOE4 also affects lipid transport and immune response, so the association doesn’t necessarily establish Alzheimer’s pathology.

“We need far more data before we can address the balance between lifestyle and genetic factors,” she said. “Generally, it is believed that the two have complementary roles.”

Researchers adapted clinical interviews and cognitive tests for language, culture and limited literacy, conducting assessments in Tsimané or Spanish. The THLHP teams also provide medical exams and help coordinate care. Future phases will use improved brain imaging and additional blood biomarkers to investigate vascular injury and Alzheimer’s pathology.

“The research is both immensely challenging and highly rewarding,” Gatz said. “We are grateful for their participation and try to assure that the research is helpful to them.”

These latest findings not only provide more information on how dementia affects the Tsimané and Mosetén communities but also raise new questions about the factors contributing to dementia risk, said Professor Hillard Kaplan, a health economist at Chapman University and THLHP principal investigator.

“While healthy hearts are generally associated with healthy brains, these new findings indicate that brain aging occurs without significant heart disease and that there is much more to be learned about the pathways leading to dementia,” he said.

About the study

Gatz’s and Kaplan’s coauthors include Wendy Mack, Helena Chui, Caleb Finch and Ellen Walters of USC; Daniel Eid Rodriguez of Universidad Mayor de San Simon (Bolivia); Raul Quispe Gutierrez and Jesus Bani Cuata of the Tsimane Health and Life History Project (Bolivia); Daniel K. Cummings of Chapman University; Paul L. Hooper of the University of New Mexico; Henrik Zetterberg of University of Wisconsin–Madison; Benjamin C. Trumble of Arizona State University; Jonathan Stieglitz of Université Toulouse Capitole (France); Michael D. Gurven of UC Santa Barbara; Randall C. Thompson of University of Missouri–Kansas City and Gregory S. Thomas of UC Irvine. The research was supported by the National Institute on Aging, the National Science Foundation and the French National Research Agency.

 

Pre-European Indigenous Australian population was much larger than previously thought and decimated after arrival of First Fleet




Flinders University



Australia had a much larger Indigenous population before the arrival of Europeans than previously thought, according to new research.

The research also demonstrates much larger population losses resulting from colonisation than previously believed, with an estimated 93 per cent of the pre-European population removed in less than 80 years following the 1788 arrival of the First Fleet.

Professor Corey Bradshaw, Flinders University Global Ecology Professor and a Chief Investigator in the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Indigenous and Environmental Histories and Futures (CIEHF), is part of a national research group working with Indigenous partners to investigate Indigenous population sizes through time.

Using sophisticated computer modelling they calculated that the Indigenous population was up to 7 times larger than previously estimated.

“Understanding the size of Indigenous populations in Australia before European invasion in 1788 is essential to truth-telling and reconciliation,” says Professor Bradshaw.

The research team arrived at new population estimates through reviewing ethnographic observations, archaeological and genetic reconstructions, and modelling environmental carrying capacity across the continent to estimate the Indigenous population size before colonisation.

Many previous estimates are anchored by one of the earliest attempts at determining pre-colonisation  populations by anthropologist Alfred Radcliffe-Brown in the 1930s, who calculated a population of 250,000 people.

However, he acknowledged these values did not account for the impacts of lethal diseases, and frontier and structural violence. Increasingly, these impacts have been shown to be far more extensive than previously known and suggest that early figures underestimate the number of people across Australia.

Using modelled and genetics-based estimates (supported by, but not relying on, historical or ethnographic accounts), the researchers calculated a median pre-colonial Indigenous population of 2.22 million, or 0.29 people per square kilometre.

This compares with previous historical estimates of only 250,000–1,000,000 people, which the researchers say are underestimates due to the far-reaching impacts of disease, and frontier and structural violence that had affected populations by the time of early Australian censuses.

The new estimate also allows calculation of the number of excess deaths in the post-1788 era. To align with early census records, the model estimates 2.06 million excess deaths (an average of about 28,200 per year) occurred between 1788 and 1861.

These estimates show that by 1861, only about 7% of the estimated pre-colonial population survived.

“These devastating findings highlight the major impacts of invasion experienced by Indigenous Australians, and demonstrate their remarkable survival, resilience and recovery over the past century,” says lead author Associate Professor Alan Williams, a Partner Investigator in CIEHF representing EMM Consulting and who is also an Adjunct Research Fellow at James Cook University.

Although the Indigenous population in Australia has grown since the 1950s, the 2021 census shows it remains at about 37% of the estimated median pre-colonial size.

If current growth trends continue, achieving parity with the 1788 Indigenous population would not be reached until around 2047.

“The findings highlight the scale of demographic catastrophe experienced by Indigenous Australians due to colonisation, with the implications being a heightened understanding of intergenerational trauma and to inform future policy that assists Indigenous people. In addition to recognising this intergenerational trauma and disadvantage, it is also time to recognise intergenerational privilege”, says co-author Distinguished Professor Lynette Russell of the Monash University Indigenous Studies Centre and CIEHF.

The researchers also say the study emphasises the importance of using multiple approaches to reconstruct population histories if historical records are incomplete or biased.

“These research findings challenge us to rethink the scale of what happened after 1788. We are not talking about a marginal consequence of colonisation but a demographic catastrophe at the heart of the Australian story. But the research also tells us something extraordinary. Our survival is one of Australian history’s most remarkable stories,” said Distinguished Professor Larissa Behrendt AO Chair, CIEHF Centre Advisory Committee.

The research – “Large size of the Australian Indigenous population prior to its massive decline following colonial invasion”, by Alan Williams, Raymond Tobler, Billy Griffiths, Sean Ulm, Matthew Nitschke, Michael Bird, Shane Ingrey, Frédérik Saltré, Kirsty Beller, Ian McNiven, Nicholas Pitt, Lynette Russell, Alistair Paterson, Christopher Wilson and Corey Bradshaw – has been published in Nature Human Behaviour. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-026-02571-9

This research was funded jointly by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Indigenous and Environmental Histories and Futures (CE230100009), and the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage (CE17010001).