Friday, October 23, 2026

   

EU and Canada draw closer in Trump’s unpredictable world – with Britain looking on

From left, From left, British Prime Minister Andy Burnham, French President Emmanuel Macron and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney.
Copyright AP Photo/Toby Melville


By Luca Bertuzzi
Published on


The EU and Canada are hoping to deepen ties at their upcoming Montreal summit, in areas like trade, energy, defence and critical minerals. Meanwhile, the UK is seeking its own reset with Brussels.

The European Union has offered Canada something it has never offered another country: associate membership. Quite what that means remains unclear, but Brussels and Ottawa are determined to turn their shared values and increasingly close relationship into a new kind of partnership in a world shaken by Donald Trump's unpredictable foreign policy.

The experiment is being watched closely in London, where Prime Minister Andy Burnham is seeking to rebuild Britain's post-Brexit relationship with the EU, raising the question of whether a similar arrangement might eventually be available to the UK.

The offer, made by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last month, has raised questions about whether associate membership is a meaningful new status, an honorary title or something in between.

At a summit in Montreal next week, the two sides will begin putting substance behind the idea, seeking closer cooperation on trade, defence, technology and energy without Canada formally joining the bloc.

But while Canada is searching for a new framework, Britain is attempting to improve an existing one, with EU and UK leaders set to meet next month to seek a much-needed reset in their relationship.

"This is a moment to act with clarity and ambition. By aligning more closely - economically, technologically, and strategically - Canada and the EU are building an Alliance for the Future based on trust and shared values," reads the latest draft of the EU-Canada joint statement, discussed by ambassadors on Wednesday.

A blank sheet

Since European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen invited Canada last month to become the EU’s first “associate member,” Brussels and Ottawa have been exploring what this privileged partnership could look like.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney prefers to talk about an “Alliance for the Future.” He has sidestepped questions on whether he is comfortable with the “associate membership” label, stressing that substance matters more.

The summit in Montreal on 29-30 October is the first real chance to define the partnership in more detail. The latest draft uses “associate membership” interchangeably with “Alliance for the Future.”

Crucially, the proposal envisages giving Canada a more regular place at the EU's table, with participation in summits, ministerial meetings and technical discussions.

It calls for "early consultations on major policy and regulatory initiatives, with Canada’s participation in these processes as an associate member of the Union."

Whether the term survives in the final text is an open question. In any case, “the full scope of this associate membership will be defined by the 2027 Canada-EU Summit,” the conclusions read.

From trade to defence

The document nonetheless tries to put more meat on the bone. It builds on the 2016 Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), which 10 EU countries have yet to ratify, to remove remaining trade barriers and ensure reciprocal market access.

“We will ensure mutually favourable treatment in our respective economic security measures, based on the principle of reciprocity in industrial sectors where both sides have agreed to align their external measures to ensure the same outcome,” the draft statement reads.

On energy, the conclusions open the door to “the development of liquefied natural gas exchanges,” notably through a joint long-term feasibility study on LNG exports to Europe.

On technology, Canada will join the EU’s supercomputer initiative, a new digital partnership will tackle issues like AI and digital identity, and an agreement to facilitate cross-border data flows is in the making.

Critical raw materials, one of Canada’s key assets for the EU, are also on the table. The two sides have agreed that the European Investment Bank will play a role in critical mineral projects, from extraction and processing to manufacturing and recycling.

In defence, Canada is already part of several EU projects, including the Permanent Structured Cooperation and the Capability Coalition, and both sides intend to deepen that cooperation on maritime security, crisis management and industrial cooperation.

The partners also envisage a cooperation framework to safeguard the information space and protect electoral integrity, with an early warning mechanism and a dialogue dedicated to foreign interference.

Other areas under discussion include border security cooperation with EU agency Frontex, criminal justice, climate security, transport and the Arctic.

Taken together, the proposals suggest a partnership extending far beyond conventional trade agreements, even if its institutional form remains uncertain.

Searching for a reset

The EU's growing closeness to Canada comes as Britain searches for a new relationship with the bloc, a decade after the Brexit referendum.

The contrast is striking. While Ottawa is being offered an undefined but potentially far-reaching new status, London is still negotiating improvements to its relationship with Brussels, largely one sector at a time.

The next EU-UK summit, postponed from the summer following Keir Starmer's resignation and Burnham's arrival in Downing Street, offers an opportunity to make progress.

While the UK government was already searching for amending ties with the bloc, Canada's approach to the EU definitively shattered one of the Brexiteers' key hopes to turn the so-called Anglosphere into a free trade area encompassing the UK, US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

"It is hardly surprising that Brexit has not delivered on that promise, and UK opinion polls have slowly started to shift in favour of rejoining," Charles Tannock, a former Conservative MEP who campaigned for Remain, told Euronews.

Since becoming Prime Minister, Burnham has repeatedly signalled that he wants to take the UK closer to the EU. He considers the status quo “not good enough” and has vowed to consider options ranging from following Canada’s example to re-entering the bloc.

While Burnham has restarted the domestic debate about rejoining the EU, the post-Brexit relationship between Brussels and London has not always been easy, with some UK officials asking why "associate membership" should not also be available for them.

“In an ideal world, with the UK we have even closer ties to the extent that the UK is a European country and if it wishes so, the ambition should not be an associate membership, but full membership,” Tobias Cremer (Germany/S&D), a leading lawmaker on EU-Canada relations, told Euronews.

Moving forward

Speaking during a European Parliament debate on Wednesday, Bernd Lange, the German Socialist who chairs the Trade Committee, welcomed a “new mood” in EU-UK relations.

He suggested that Britain could pursue an arrangement resembling Switzerland's relationship with the bloc, alongside closer political and security cooperation and a customs union.

But Brussels rejected the Swiss model as a template for Britain during the Brexit negotiations.

Switzerland's complex network of bilateral agreements has long frustrated EU officials, who argue that such arrangements are difficult to oversee and enforce, particularly when they provide access to parts of the single market without all the accompanying obligations.

Instead, British and EU negotiators are focusing on specific agreements covering agricultural trade, emissions trading and youth mobility.

A recent Franco-German proposal to include the UK in the 'Made in Europe' rules removed one sore point, but London is hoping to extend it to other sectors where it sees EU industrial policy becoming increasingly protectionist.

In defence, the EU needs the UK as part of a broader European security architecture, but the two sides failed to agree to include Britain in the planned Security Action for Europe (SAFE) for defence procurement.

Brussels offered Canada much better terms for SAFE, with a token upfront payment of around €10m. It asked the UK for a whopping €6.5bn, with no guarantee its industry would win any contracts, leading to a breakdown in the negotiations.

“Burnham is on a learning curve, to be honest," Tannock said. "He needs to. He’s been the mayor of Manchester for some years. He hasn’t been focused on this issue. He will be trying to get fully up to speed with what’s available."

Peggy Corlin contributed to the reporting.




EU-Canada 'love story' needs more than warm words, senior MEP warns

Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at the European Parliament in Strasbourg, France, Sept 17, 2026.
Copyright AP Photo

By Peggy Corlin
Published on

European Parliament’s point man on Canada, Tobias Cremer, told Euronews that the planned “associate membership” should include an institutional framework formalising closer ties between the EU and Canada.

The EU must turn its offer of “associate membership” to Canada into a meaningful partnership that goes well beyond trade, Tobias Cremer, the European Parliament's standing rapporteur on Canada, told Euronews.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen invited Canada to become the EU's first “associate member” in September, but gave little indication of what the unprecedented status would mean in practice.

The offer comes as geopolitical upheaval draws Brussels and Ottawa closer together. Canada is embroiled in a trade war with its traditional US ally, while the EU is struggling to keep Washington on its side over Ukraine.

The two sides are due to meet at a summit in Montreal at the end of next week, with agreements expected in several areas, including critical raw materials and digital cooperation.

“For the last couple of months, we've been great, Canada and Europe, at writing each other love letters and saying how much we really want to work together,” said Cremer, a German socialist MEP. “But I think now is really the time to start to get serious and turn that love story into concrete commitments.”

He added that “associate membership” must mean the “closest possible partnership that the EU can offer to a non-European country and since Canada is probably the most European of non-European countries that should be very close.”

Beyond trade deals

Cremer insisted that the relationship must amount to more than “a trade deal ‘plus’”.

“There must be a new quality to the relation.”

He called for a “pragmatic approach,” involving sectoral agreements covering trade, defence, digital cooperation, the Arctic and students, but also going further.

“We should go a step further and start embedding all of these great initiatives into something more enduring, into a common institutional framework of coordination and cooperation.”

Cremer suggested that Canada could participate “as an observer” in the Council of the EU, where national ministers meet, and called for the creation of a formal parliamentary partnership assembly.

Such a body could follow the model of the existing EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership Assembly, which brings together 35 members from each side twice a year for sessions that can focus on specific policy areas.

Regarding the UK, however, the MEP described it as a European country for which, “if it wishes so,” the ambition “should not be associate membership, but full membership.”

His comments came as UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham recently floated the idea of rejoining the EU, with polls showing that a majority of Britons want to return to the bloc.

But Cremer also argued for closer cooperation not only with the UK and Canada, but also with countries such as Australia and South Korea.

“I think it is of our interest to bring all of these actors together and say 'hold on, actually the majority of the world wants to play 21st century politics which is focused on collective security, on shared interests, on mutual respect rather than might is right.'”



Turkey, Canada unveil new “strategic partnership” as Carney visits Ankara

Turkey, Canada unveil new “strategic partnership” as Carney visits Ankara
Erdogan, right, was reported as telling Carney: "We had diplomatic relations, but we had some kind of disconnect for a very long time now. And today we put an end to it." / Turkish presidencyFacebook
By bne IntelliNews October 22, 2026

Defence, transportation and energy will be at the heart of a new “strategic partnership” between Canada and Turkey, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said on October 22, while on an official visit to Ankara.

Carney is eager to build ties with countries around the world, given that he is locked in an escalating and bruising trade war with US President Donald Trump that means he is in a hurry to reduce Canadian dependence on neighbouring America.

Carney and Erdogan signed the partnership declaration between the two middle powers together and announced the start of negotiations on a free trade agreement.

“We have taken a historic step toward the future of our relations,” Erdogan said after the signing ceremony, as quoted by the Associated Press (AP). “Elevating our relations to the level of a strategic partnership will not remain merely on paper; it will not be a merely symbolic step,” he added.

“No country, whatever it’s blessed with, no country builds strength alone,” Carney said. “The most resilient countries bring together complementary strengths, with trusted partners.”

Carney will visit Istanbul on October 23 for talks with Turkish business groups.

Erdogan said Turkey and Canada are hopeful of building up their annual bilateral trade from around $3bn to $5bn initially, and then to $10bn.

In investment, there is some prospect that Ottawa and Ankara will study the feasibility of a bid by Canada's Candu nuclear team to build Turkey's planned second or third nuclear power plant.

In 2024, Canada ended an export ban on the sale of weapons to Turkey. It was imposed in a response to military incursions into Syria conducted by Turkey, as well as to show Canada’s opposition to the provision by Ankara of backing for Azerbaijan in its conflict with Armenia. Some military drone equipment provided to the Azerbaijanis by Turkey was, to Ottawa's displeasure, partly made with Canadian parts.

“Allies must be able to rely on each other for equipment and capabilities that keep us safe,” Carney was further reported as saying by the AP.

“Today’s new agreement on defence industry partnership will connect Canadian and Turkish companies to work together, creating good jobs at home, export opportunities abroad, greater security for our citizens and contributing to a stronger Nato alliance,” he added.

CBC reported Erdogan as saying that a new chapter in relations between Turkey and Canada was opening, stating: "We had diplomatic relations, but we had some kind of disconnect for a very long time now. And today we put an end to it. Now comes a new period, a new era for Turkey and Canada. This is what we're starting today."

The fact that Turkey has become increasingly authoritarian under Erdogan, its leader of 23 years, has not gone unnoticed in Canada and there is considerable disquiet in the country at the upgrading in relations with Ankara.

"This is morally a difficult dilemma on the Canadian side, but the calculus appears on the part of the government that if Canada were to choose to diversify only with democracies the ceiling for success would be low," Thomas Juneau of the University of Ottawa, an expert on the Middle East, was quoted as saying by CBC.

 

OTHER SIDE OF THE BOSPORUS: 

PKK-tied group in France condemns country’s violent mayhem

OTHER SIDE OF THE BOSPORUS: PKK-tied group in France condemns country’s violent mayhem
Once upon a time in 2019: The CDK-F exhibits an example of non-looting, non-vandalism and non-violent protest in Paris as it hoists banners opposing Turkey’s president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan. / cdkf.frFacebook
By Akin Nazli in Belgrade October 22, 2026

The Democratic Kurdish Council in France (Conseil Démocratique Kurde en France, or CDK-F) has condemned in the strongest terms the looting, vandalism and severe violence witnessed over October 17-18 in Paris, Marseille and other urban locations.

CDK-F, which in some ways can be described as a wing of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) in France, issued its statement of condemnation on its X account (@Le_CDKF). The PKK is designated as a terrorist organisation by the EU.

“The right to protest, to express anger or to present demands is a fundamental freedom in a democracy,” the umbrella group, which represents dozens of Kurdish associations across France, also said.

“However”

“However, no claim, whatever it may be, can justify violence, attacks on individuals, businesses, public or private property or the scenes of looting we have witnessed,” CDK-F added.

The CDK-F called for “calm, responsibility and respect for democratic principles.”

The riots across the weekend saw smashed storefronts, looted retail premises and disrupted commercial districts in France's largest metropolitan areas. For the French government, the protests present a unresolved dilemma.

Coalition with Socialist Party

On October 12, the CDK-F inaugurated the House of Kurdistan of France (la Maison du Kurdistan de France/MKF) at Paris City Hall (Hôtel de Ville) “in the heart of Paris”.

About 300 people, including politicians, academics and representatives of institutions, community associations and cultural spheres, were present at the event co-organised by the MKF and the City of Paris.

Among them were Mayor of Paris Emmanuel Gregoire and French ex-president Francois Hollande. They are members of the Socialist Party. Both politicians (@egregoire and @fhollande) and their party (@partisocialiste) accused protesters of “violence, looting and vandalism”. 

For the March local elections this year, the CDK-F formed a coalition with the Socialist Party. For the first time, more than 30 Kurds were elected to municipal councils across France.

The remarkable thing about the Socialist Party of France, launched in 1969 as a social democratic party, is that it is not socialist. The PKK, meanwhile, left socialist ideology behind it following the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Who was the perpetrator?

The mayor opened the MKF inauguration ceremony with a speech. He evoked “the shared memory of the Kurds and Paris, deeply marked by the attacks of 2013 and 2022.” 

Gregoire paid tribute to the victims, namely Sakine Cansiz, Fidan Dogan, Leyla Soylemez, Evin Goyi, Mir Perwer and Abdurrahman Kizil. To “all those calling for truth and justice,” the mayor reaffirmed the solidarity of the City of Paris while acknowledging that the French state could do more to reveal the truth of the events.

The 2013 reference points to the assassination of three women (Cansiz, Dogan and Soylemez) during the night of January 9-10 at the Centre d'Information sur le Kurdistan located on 147 Rue La Fayette. The CDK-F accused Turkey’s intelligence service (MIT) of being behind the incident.

Coalition with Turkish government

Lately, the CDK-F has preferred to not refer to the alleged perpetrator. On August 11, the CDK-F welcomed the Turkish parliament's adoption of a law establishing a first legal framework for the establishment of peace and a democratic society in Turkey.

“Abdullah Ocalan [the PKK’s leader, who is imprisoned in Turkey] must have the legal, material and political conditions allowing him to communicate freely and to continue his role as coordinator in the implementation and success of the process,” the CDK-F said.

Back in 2023, the CDK-F was wont to describe Turkey’s government as “the Islamo-fascist regime of Erdogan”.

Turned vehicles upside down, wounded police officers

The mayor of Paris’s reference to 2022 points to the murder of the other three individuals on December 23 by a racist gunman on Rue d'Enghien in the 10th arrondissement of Paris, near Ahmet Kaya Kurdish Cultural Centre.

The day after the killings, Kurds in Paris took to the streets. They wounded dozens of police officers in street protests, set vehicles on fire and flipped them over.

Female fighters, symbol of feminism

Ex-president Hollande addressed the crowd at the inauguration ceremony. Looking back at the events that marked his presidency, he praised the decisive role of Syrian Kurdish fighters against the Islamic State.

He also recalled that he, as the president of France, had welcomed Kurdish female fighters at the Elysee Palace.

420,000 Kurds in France

Hollande also underlined the need to maintain French solidarity with the Kurdish people without relating it to geopolitical shifts or short-term political agreements. The former head of state also underscored the importance of the Kurdish community in France, numbering some 420,000 people.

The CDK-F brings together 27 associations located in the main cities of France and has  62,000 members, according to its official website.

No to drugs and criminal networks

On October 6, the CDK-F launched a “France-wide campaign against drugs and criminal networks”. The comprehensive national awareness-raising and prevention campaign aims to protect the youth from addiction, drug trafficking, violence and the control mechanisms of criminal networks.

The phenomena related to narcotics, addiction, violence and organised crime are issues that concern the whole of French society, the association also said.






 

Southeast Asian neighbours fume as Indonesia’s fire crisis chokes millions

Southeast Asian neighbours fume as Indonesia’s fire crisis chokes millions
/ Malachi Brooks - UnsplashFacebook
By IntelliNews - Surabaya Bureau October 23, 2026

While severe drought driven by a "Godzilla" El Niño provided the dry spell across Southeast Asia in 2026, recent reports show that Indonesia’s wildfires, rampant in Sumatra and Kalimantan as well as in Papua and some areas in Java, are not an unavoidable act of nature. The fires are a predictable, preventable outcome of deliberate man-made land clearing attempts.

As a result, two neighbours of Indonesia, Singapore and Malaysia have become the most outspoken collateral of the haze. In an effort to hold accountable the responsible parties, Singapore’s National Environment Agency (NEA) has issued formal Preventive Measure Notices (PMNs) to 10 Indonesian concession owners whose lands were matched to cross-border haze plumes, The Straits Times reports. The outcry from both countries has flooded the internet, begging Indonesia to take over control of the land.

The devastating effects of land-clearing

It has been found that commercial agricultural operators and forestry concession holders routinely employ illegal "slash-and-burn" methods to clear land. This is the cheapest way to clear peatland for palm oil, timber, and pulp plantations, but is a reckless move that ignites underground carbon deposits that can burn uncontrollably for weeks.

What begins as corporate cost-cutting on concession land in West Kalimantan or South Sumatra rapidly expands into a multi-billion-dollar environmental crime, destroying local ecosystems and exporting toxic particulate matter across international borders.

As a result, Indonesian law enforcement and environmental agencies have increasingly targeted the corporate entities profiting from these operations. National Police Chief Suyudi Ario Seto confirmed that authorities are investigating 98 corporate cases, with investigators gathering evidence to hold company owners and major shareholders criminally liable, Tempo reports. Simultaneously, the Ministry of Forestry has sealed off 57 commercial sites and imposed administrative sanctions on 32 plantation companies covering more than 12,900 hectares of scorched land.

Cross-border legal actions have intensified scrutiny on specific market players. Under its Transboundary Haze Pollution Act (THPA), some of the named companies include the Kalimantan-based concessions: PT Buana Megatama Jaya, PT Mananjung Hayak, and PT Baratama Putra Perkasa and Sumatra-based concessions: PT Bumi Andalas Permai, PT Bumi Mekar Hijau, PT SBA Wood Industries, PT Paramitra Mulia Langgeng, PT Sumatera Alam Anugerah, PT Hutan Lestari Raya, and PT Bangkanesia.

This interconnected supply chain has prompted regulatory bodies like the Singapore Exchange (SGX) to demand formal disclosures from major listed agribusinesses, including Golden Agri-Resources, Wilmar International, and Bumitama Agri.

However, investigations reveal that corporate responsibility is not purely domestic. Indonesian authorities and independent forest watchdogs confirm that many targeted concessions involve complex foreign ownership structures, including equity stakes, parent holding groups, and joint ventures linked to investors in Malaysia and Singapore. But the fact that this happens under the sovereignty of Indonesian land, still puts the country under the spotlight.

The domestic human toll and economic loss

Within Indonesia, the consequences of this corporate negligence are felt most acutely by vulnerable populations and smallholders. Over 300,000 people have suffered from acute respiratory infections (ARI) since August, with almost 70,000 cases involving toddlers diagnosed with bronchitis and pneumonia, DW reports.

According to the Centre of Economic and Law Studies (Celios), total potential economic losses from January to August 2026 stand between IDR39.29 trillion ($2.2bn) and IDR123.1 trillion. Direct commercial disruptions in retail, agriculture, and hospitality reached IDR29.54 trillion (0.23% of national GDP).

When accounting for medical treatment and lost income for an estimated 17.4mn people exposed to hazardous smoke, health-related expenses surge to IDR93.56 trillion, an amount equal to 67.6% of Indonesia's 2026 national health budget. At the grassroots level, smallholders in provinces like South Kalimantan have suffered catastrophic losses as fires spread into family plots, destroying crops and forcing low-income families into medical debt.

The number of fire victims have increased significantly too. The latest casualty number is five - people who were killed volunteering in firefighting at Bromo Tengger Semeru National Park in East Java. the five deceased were trapped by sudden flare-ups and strong winds. Four other deaths were caused by smoke inhalation and include an infant and an elderly person as well as people with pre-existing asthmatic conditions.

In what could be classified as one big gas chamber given NASA’s satellite imaging, carbon monoxide levels are surpassing normal levels meaning that the victim tally might increase even post-haze as long-term health problems kick-in.

It is not only people affected as wildlife is also suffering from the loss of their natural habitat, Kompas reports. The WWF notes that Kalimantan is home to around 222 mammal species (including 44 endemic creatures) 420 types of bird (37 endemic), 100 amphibians and 394 fish (19 endemic). And the ongoing forest and land fires in East Kotawaringin Regency (Kotim), Central Kalimantan have devastated local wildlife habitats, driving protected species into human settlements and agricultural land in search of food and refuge.

Between August and October 2026, the Sampit Post of the Natural Resources Conservation Agency (BKSDA) and local rescue volunteers successfully evacuated multiple animals in weakened, sick, or injured states, including an injured silvery lutung (Trachypithecus cristatus) in Tanah Mas and four orangutans across Baamang and Mentaya Hilir. Notably, a 20-year-old female orangutan named Ira was rescued on October 14 in Baamang Hulu after her destroyed part of the forest forced her onto a resident's farm; BKSDA continues to monitor five additional hotspot sightings where orangutans have encroached upon residential and plantation perimeters.

Many other animals meanwhile have succumbed directly to the flames and habitat destruction before rescue teams could reach them. Joint patrols conducted by animal welfare activists and BKSDA officers in burnt-out concessions, such as Terantang Hilir Village, have uncovered carcasses of protected wildlife, including two pangolins and various snake species killed during the infernos. Evacuation efforts remain fraught with danger and logistical hurdles, as rescuers and volunteers are forced to navigate treacherous terrain marked by deep potholes, fallen root networks, and thick toxic smoke, highlighting the severe biodiversity loss caused by the recurring wildfires.

Regional casualties

The toxic haze generated by these man-made fires is not confined to a single geographic vector. At first, Indonesia insisted that the haze wouldn’t travel north towards Singapore and Malaysia. But as the severity of the fire increased, the smoke has not only moved exclusively northward, but the wind corridors have even dispersed hazardous PM2.5 haze in every direction, impacting multiple neighbouring nations.

The first is Singapore, with its 24-hour Pollutant Standards Index (PSI) that has climbed to read 230 - the equivalent of a very unhealthy reading. Economist Prof. Euston Quah estimates the 2026 haze could cost Singapore up to SGD3.9bn ($3.1bn) in healthcare costs, lost tourism, and reduced business productivity.

In Sarawak, Malaysia on the island of Borneo, the Air Pollutant Index (API) reached a hazardous 201, and authorities extended school closures across multiple districts. Sunway University economist Prof. Yeah Kim Leng estimates daily economic losses between MYR20mn ($4.9mn) and MYR50mn, leading local municipal leaders to publicly suggest that Indonesian regional authorities compensate affected Malaysian states for health and tourism damages.

To the south, Timor-Leste became the latest haze casualty, disproving the assumption that the haze only travels north. The thick smoke plumes drifting south forced Timor-Leste authorities to issue a three-day nationwide closure of all schools starting on October 15 to protect children from severe air pollution.

For the Philippines and overall broader corridor, the local health departments in the central and southern Philippines issued stay-at-home advisories due to airborne haze, while Australian meteorologists actively tracked high-altitude smoke corridors extending over the Indian Ocean toward Christmas Island.

Diplomatic friction

While President Prabowo Subianto's administration has deployed more than 60,000 security personnel, 47 aircraft, and accepted technical assistance from Japan and neighbouring ASEAN states, regional partners maintain that suppression is merely reactive.

Singapore Senior Minister K. Shanmugam noted that while taking administrative or legal action against foreign-linked concession holders carries diplomatic nuances, enforcing laws against irresponsible operators aligns directly with Indonesia's own public health interests. With the ASEAN Coordination Centre for Transboundary Haze Pollution Control maintaining a Level 3 Alert, neighbouring countries are demanding stronger preventive law enforcement, strict land-use oversight, and the elimination of financial incentives for illegal burning to break the annual cycle of man-made environmental destruction.

The situation within Indonesia is slowly escalating. The general public’s distrust with the government due to the way they are handling the haze problem has driven local environment organisations to protest at Jakarta's Welcome (Selamat Datang) landmark with members of Greenpeace Indonesia hanging signs calling the government incompetent in mitigating the expanding fire as well as for corruption. At least eight people have been detained by police because of the protests.

And still the haze enveops the region. More coordinated protests are expected in the days to come as the whole region watches the government’s ever-changing strategies in putting the fires out.

Serbia’s student movement stages mass rally ahead of snap election

Serbia’s student movement stages mass rally ahead of snap election
/ studenti.org.rsFacebook
By Tatyana Kekic in Belgrade October 23, 2026

Tens of thousands of students and their supporters filled central Belgrade on the evening of October 22 in a final show of strength before the October 25 parliamentary election, as the ruling party staged its own rally across the city.

The atmosphere at Slavija Square was jubilant. Flags and banners supporting the student movement waved above the crowd, music played and people sang together, raising the torches on their mobile phones.

Long columns of students and supporters had set off from different parts of the Serbian capital, converging on the central roundabout. They cheered, whistled and waved as they made their way through the streets, drawing residents to their balconies to watch or join the procession.

By the evening, tens of thousands had gathered at Slavija for the final rally of the Student List, the movement’s electoral vehicle, under the slogan “Victory Is Calling”.

The euphoric scenes offered another illustration of the movement’s ability to mobilise people across Serbia after nearly two years of regular student-led protests, street blockades and demonstrations. Supporters have travelled to Belgrade on foot from towns and cities across the country in the days leading up to the rally.

The question is whether that enthusiasm can translate into votes on Sunday, when Serbs elect a new parliament.

A tale of two cities

Across the city, the ruling Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) held its own final campaign rally at a sports hall in New Belgrade, where former president and candidate for prime minister Aleksandar Vucic addressed supporters.

Outside the venue, buses brought in party supporters as patriotic music played over loudspeakers and pleskavica (Serbian burgers) were prepared.

Vucic, who has dominated Serbian politics for more than a decade, delivered his five-point programme, promising improvements in living standards, wages, pensions, healthcare, energy and education.

He accused the student-backed list of lacking answers to the country’s problems. When some members of the audience began chanting insults directed at the students, calling them ‘Ustashe’ (Croatian fascists), Vucic intervened from the stage to quieten them before urging supporters to vote for his list, United Serbia, on Sunday.

The two gatherings presented contrasting images of the campaign’s final hours: an established political party relying on its organisation and a grassroots students movement seeking to turn a mass protest movement into an electoral force.

The rallies came as the campaign entered its final hours before the start of the pre-election silence at midnight.

From protests to the ballot box

The student movement emerged after a concrete canopy collapsed at the railway station in Novi Sad on 1 November 2024, killing 16 people. The disaster prompted widespread anger over alleged corruption, government accountability and failures of public institutions.

The movement has since attracted support well beyond university campuses, with students taking their message to smaller towns and villages, including areas where the ruling party has traditionally enjoyed strong backing.

Its campaign has also made extensive use of social media to reach voters, organise events and build a sense of collective purpose.

According to data reported by BBC Serbian, the SNS spent about €105,000 on advertising on Meta platforms, including Facebook and Instagram, between 16 September and 15 October. The Student List spent around €122,000, the highest amount among election participants.

But the movement faces a formidable opponent. The SNS has extensive local networks, greater access to traditional media and the support of many older voters and public-sector employees. The campaign has also been marked by allegations of pressure on public-sector workers and concerns about the fairness of media coverage.

The Centre for Research, Transparency and Accountability (CRTA) found that government representatives accounted for 69% of political airtime on national television during extended prime-time broadcasts between 9 and 30 September, compared with 31% for the opposition. Of coverage devoted to the Student List, 88% was negative in tone, the organisation reported.

The student movement, meanwhile, has yet to establish the same kind of nationwide political organisation as the ruling party. Its electoral challenge will depend in part on whether the enthusiasm seen at rallies can bring undecided voters and those who rarely vote to the polls.

Despite the odds stacked against the opposition, opinion polls published during the campaign have suggested a close contest. A survey by NSPM published on October 20 even put the Student List ahead on 44.4% and United Serbia on 42.7%.

Whether the energy of the streets can withstand the advantages of an entrenched political machine will become clearer when polling stations close on Sunday.

Thursday, October 22, 2026

Billionaires and 'dark money' fuel record spending on US midterms

With control of the United States Congress at stake in the country's 3 November elections, candidates and their backers are pouring billions into the campaign. The battle is heading towards a spending record, with political advertising alone expected to reach a cost of $11.6 billion.



Issued on: 21/10/2026 - RFI


Elon Musk has contributed $369 million since the start of the 2026 electoral cycle.
 AP - Evan Vucci


As the Democrats seek to wrest control of the House of Representatives and the Senate from the Republicans, campaigns are competing for space on television, streaming services and social media.

An $11.6bn total would exceed both the $8.9 billion spent during the 2022 midterms and the $11 billion recorded in the 2024 presidential cycle, according to advertising tracker AdImpact.

“In a highly uncertain election, much more is spent,” explains Vincent Michelot, a specialist in US political history and professor emeritus at Sciences Po Lyon.

Competitive races attract more investment, while attack adverts push opponents to respond quickly – sometimes paying a premium for slots already in high demand.

Beyond advertising, candidates must pay staff, travel across their constituencies and organise efforts to get supporters to the polls.

Congressional candidates had spent more than $2 billion by the end of June, according to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) – 16 percent more than at the same stage in 2022. They had raised $2.8 billion, up from $2.4 billion four years earlier.



First Amendment

Candidates generally rely on private donations, unless they can draw on personal wealth. But there are limits on what supporters can give directly.

An individual may contribute up to $3,500 to a candidate per election. Primaries and general elections count separately.

Candidates can also receive support from political parties and political action committees, known as PACs. Companies and trade unions can establish PACs financed through voluntary contributions from eligible employees or members. Qualifying PACs can give up to $5,000 to a candidate per election.

The much larger sums associated with US politics usually flow through a different route: super-PACs.

These organisations emerged following two court rulings in 2010 and can accept unlimited contributions from individuals, companies and trade unions.

They cannot donate directly to candidates or coordinate their spending with campaigns. They can, however, spend vast sums independently on advertising that promotes a candidate or attacks an opponent.

By the end of June, super-PACs had raised nearly $2.5 billion, according to the FEC – 74 percent more than at the same point in 2022. Their independent expenditure had risen by 79 percent to almost $530 million.

The legal framework rests on the protection of political expression under the First Amendment to the US Constitution. Courts have treated spending to promote political views as protected expression, while retaining limits on direct contributions to guard against corruption.

The rules were further loosened on 30 June, when the Supreme Court struck down limits on spending which political parties coordinate with their candidates. Republican committees subsequently exceeded the former national caps by more than $48 million, Reuters reported.

Billionaire backers

Wealthy donors have several avenues to influence the campaign – and the biggest contributions are increasingly concentrated among a small group.

Analysis by the Washington Post found that the 50 biggest donors had contributed nearly $2.4 billion to federal political committees. Republican-aligned donors accounted for $1.54 billion, compared with $590 million from Democrat supporters.

Elon Musk leads the field, having contributed $369 million since the start of the cycle. In September, he gave $158 million to the Republican Senate Leadership Fund, which transferred matching sums to a group supporting Ken Paxton against Democrat James Talarico in Texas.

Democrats also have billionaire backers. Former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg has committed around $80 million to support them, with a particular focus on winning back the House.

For Michelot, donations on this scale raise questions about what contributors expect in return.

“When you donate a few hundred or a few thousand euros to a campaign in France, you have no hope of influencing the outcome, but when you donate several million in one go, there is inevitably an expectation of what comes next."

Industry influence

Corporate interests are also helping shape the contest, sometimes backing candidates across party lines.

According to an August study by advocacy group Public Citizen, cryptocurrency, technology and artificial intelligence companies had contributed $268 million, notably to super-PACs. That represented more than 40 percent of reported corporate contributions to these organisations.

Fairshake, a cryptocurrency-backed super-PAC, announced in early October that it was supporting 32 House candidates – 19 Republicans and 13 Democrats – who favour legislation championed by the industry.

The AI-backed group Leading the Future, launched in 2025, has adopted a similar approach.

Tracing the original source of political money is not always straightforward, however.

A New York Times investigation found that around $1 billion from donors whose identities were not publicly disclosed had already flowed through the electoral system this year.

Known as “dark money”, this funding can pass through non-profit organisations that are not required to publicly identify their contributors.

Super-PACs must disclose their donors and expenditure. But when a donation comes from one of these non-profits, the declared name may reveal only the intermediary, leaving the original source hidden.

The practice spans the political spectrum. In August, Democrat-aligned House Majority Forward transferred $20 million to a super-PAC supporting House candidates. Republican-aligned One Nation has transferred more than $70 million to a group backing Senate contenders during this cycle.

Meanwhile, the body responsible for enforcing campaign finance rules has limited ability to act.

The FEC has lacked a quorum since April 2025. With only two commissioners serving on its six-member panel, it cannot secure the four votes needed to authorise enforcement investigations or impose civil penalties.

Campaigns must still submit financial reports, allowing journalists and watchdogs to scrutinise spending. But as this accelerates closer to polling day, the regulator cannot take key enforcement decisions.

“There’s no sheriff in town anymore,” says Michelot.

This article has been adapted from the original version in French by Aurore Lartigue.



Senegal unions press on with general strike days before Youth Olympics


Senegal’s three-day general strike entered its second day on Thursday, with unions pressing the government to honour agreements on pay, pensions and working conditions amid a deepening economic crisis. The action comes just days before Senegal hosts the Youth Olympic Games.


Issued on: 22/10/2026 - RFI

Members of Senegal's FSDT union confederation march in Dakar to demand the implementation of labour agreements and reforms to the pension and social security systems. REUTERS - Misper Apaw

The strike, called by the Front for the Defence of Workers (FSDT), which brings together 13 union confederations, began on Wednesday.

Union representatives said the action was being widely followed across several sectors, including education, electricity and public transport.

Electricity workers reported strong participation on Wednesday despite official requisitions requiring some staff to maintain services.

Dakar Dem Dikk public transport workers also observed the strike, although the state brought in military personnel to drive buses, union representatives said.

Public transportation was widely disrupted in the capital Dakar, as most public buses remained at the national company’s depot.

“This isn’t good; they really should be working. The trip will be longer and more complicated," said student Saliou Khouma.

However, one striking city hall employee enjoying a Touba coffee behind a stand said it was their "duty" to respect the strike.

"We can’t organise the YOG (Youth Olympic Games) with billions at stake when, right now, Senegalese workers aren’t being respected. There should be a thoughtful dialogue to try to defuse the situation rather than intimidate the workers."

Senegal’s Ministry of Public Service, Labour and Public Service Reform said in a statement on Monday that the strike was unlawful, arguing that the unions had not followed the correct procedures.

Pay and pensions

The unions say workers can no longer make ends meet and accuse the state of ignoring their demands.

Under a new Labour Code promulgated in early September, employers can keep workers on fixed-term contracts for up to four years. Unions want that capped at two years.

They also argue that the government has failed to fulfil commitments made under a national social stability pact signed in May.

Their demands include higher pensions, raising the compulsory retirement age from 60 to 65, payment of outstanding bonuses and the effective extension of a housing allowance worth 100,000 CFA francs (€153).

The pact affects key public services including health, education, higher education, electricity and local government.

Unions also allege mass or abusive redundancies in major state-linked companies and are demanding that dismissed workers be reinstated.

Olympic pressure

The action comes days before Senegal hosts the Youth Olympic Games from 31 October to 13 November – the first Olympic sporting event to be held on African soil.

“This is a favourable moment for the unions, because it comes as the Youth Olympic Games approach,” political scientist Moussa Diaw, a researcher at Gaston Berger University in Saint-Louis, told RFI.

“It's also a very difficult socio-economic context. Senegal is facing a debt crisis as well as a political crisis, as there are tensions between the executive and the legislature.”

The unions believe the government has not honoured all its commitments, Diaw said. Rising living costs, higher electricity prices and power cuts are also sources of public frustration, he said.

Senegal is struggling with a heavy debt burden. Debt stood at 132 percent of gross domestic product at the end of 2024, part of which unions claim had been “hidden” by the previous government under president Macky Sall.

The government has agreed a financing arrangement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for a $2.2 billion support programme over 36 months aimed at restoring the country’s public finances.

Budget squeeze

That leaves the authorities with limited room to meet the unions’ demands while controlling spending.

“Satisfying these demands at a time when the budget is very tight is a real balancing act,” Diaw said.

The government repeatedly says it has no money while political demands for funding continue, he said.

The government has urged unions to suspend the strike and return to negotiations. Public Service and Labour Minister Mamadou Lamine Dianté made a formal appeal on Monday, calling for dialogue and consultation.

The government acted too late, Diaw said.

“It will be a showdown,” he said, describing the strike as a test of both the unions’ ability to mobilise workers and the government’s commitment to dialogue.

(with AFP)