KULTURE KAMPF
Black Conservative addresses an Alberta Christian University and a free speech fight breaks out,
Sey, an anti-abortion activist with the Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform who also runs the blog SlowtoWrite and has contributed to many conservative websites, spoke to students over Zoom on Feb. 4.
EDMONTON — An Alberta Christian university student council has disavowed its own apology, issued after a Black History Month speaker denied the existence of systemic racism in a speech on Biblical definitions of racism.
© Provided by National Post Samuel Sey at his Brampton, Ont., home on Monday. In a speech, he denied systemic racism based on Biblical definitions.
Last Monday, Ambrose University in Calgary said the speech, given in February by Samuel Sey, a conservative activist, blogger and Christian who is Black, “caused severe harm” to some students.
“As a Christian, what I was saying should not be controversial to them at all, but because they disagree with what the Bible says on racism, it becomes offensive to them,” Sey told the National Post on Monday. “They are essentially, by attacking me, attacking the Bible; I didn’t go there to share my opinion, I was going there to explain what the Bible says about racism.”
The apology, which was retracted Thursday, said the student council had “invited speakers to come and speak to our student body who have caused harm and offence with the words that they have spoken.”
An updated post detailed Ambrose’s commitment to free expression and intellectual diversity.
“Each person has their own experiences and we believe that by having healthy discussions and learning different world views that we have the opportunity to expand our horizons,” the statement says.
The apology was “never intended to be public and sought only to provide support for those students who had been emotionally affected,” the statement says.
Last Monday, Ambrose University in Calgary said the speech, given in February by Samuel Sey, a conservative activist, blogger and Christian who is Black, “caused severe harm” to some students.
“As a Christian, what I was saying should not be controversial to them at all, but because they disagree with what the Bible says on racism, it becomes offensive to them,” Sey told the National Post on Monday. “They are essentially, by attacking me, attacking the Bible; I didn’t go there to share my opinion, I was going there to explain what the Bible says about racism.”
The apology, which was retracted Thursday, said the student council had “invited speakers to come and speak to our student body who have caused harm and offence with the words that they have spoken.”
An updated post detailed Ambrose’s commitment to free expression and intellectual diversity.
“Each person has their own experiences and we believe that by having healthy discussions and learning different world views that we have the opportunity to expand our horizons,” the statement says.
The apology was “never intended to be public and sought only to provide support for those students who had been emotionally affected,” the statement says.
Sey, an anti-abortion activist with the Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform who also runs the blog SlowtoWrite and has contributed to many conservative websites, spoke to students over Zoom on Feb. 4.
The event was in honour of Black History Month, according to an Ambrose Student Council Facebook post.
It was intended “as part of our commitment to fostering conversations about racism and how we can support members of our community who have experienced racism,” the student council said in an email to the National Post.
Sey provided his notes for the speech to the Post. It opens with a question and a proposition: “If I asked you, what’s the best anti-racist book today, what would you say?”
“If we say anything other than the Bible we’re completely and destructively wrong.”
Sey argues that racism is determined by intention, not outcome, if you go by the Biblical definition. He cites two books of the Bible: 2 Timothy and James, arguing the “Christian definition of racism is that it’s partiality, or bias against someone because of their skin colour.”
It means “our opinions, feelings and experiences do not determine what’s racist,” he concludes. “Racial disparities between white people and black people do not prove racism…. A lack of diversity or representation doesn’t determine what’s racist.”
Sey also suggests there needs to be “a policy or law within a system — especially our political system — that shows partiality for white people or partiality against black people.” Absent that, there cannot be systemic racism, he says.
“I know no one here today can identify a single racist law,” he says.
According to the student council statement, his views — and the event itself — “caused some members of the community to feel as though Ambrose did not support their lived experience of systemic racism.”
“I guess they didn’t expect what would come out of my mouth,” Sey told the Post.
The event was in honour of Black History Month, according to an Ambrose Student Council Facebook post.
It was intended “as part of our commitment to fostering conversations about racism and how we can support members of our community who have experienced racism,” the student council said in an email to the National Post.
Sey provided his notes for the speech to the Post. It opens with a question and a proposition: “If I asked you, what’s the best anti-racist book today, what would you say?”
“If we say anything other than the Bible we’re completely and destructively wrong.”
Sey argues that racism is determined by intention, not outcome, if you go by the Biblical definition. He cites two books of the Bible: 2 Timothy and James, arguing the “Christian definition of racism is that it’s partiality, or bias against someone because of their skin colour.”
It means “our opinions, feelings and experiences do not determine what’s racist,” he concludes. “Racial disparities between white people and black people do not prove racism…. A lack of diversity or representation doesn’t determine what’s racist.”
Sey also suggests there needs to be “a policy or law within a system — especially our political system — that shows partiality for white people or partiality against black people.” Absent that, there cannot be systemic racism, he says.
“I know no one here today can identify a single racist law,” he says.
According to the student council statement, his views — and the event itself — “caused some members of the community to feel as though Ambrose did not support their lived experience of systemic racism.”
“I guess they didn’t expect what would come out of my mouth,” Sey told the Post.
© Peter J. Thompson/National Post “My skin colour does not define truth. As Christians, the Bible is supposed to define what’s true,” says cultural blogger Samuel Sey.
He said he did ask the students to feel free to offer criticism.
“I don’t want anyone to be afraid to challenge me because of my skin colour,” he said. “My skin colour does not define truth. As Christians, the Bible is supposed to define what’s true.”
The Ambrose student council said that Sey was vetted, but that they feel the process fell short for this event.
“As a result, we have amended our vetting process so that we may better inform students about topics that are being discussed especially when they may conflict with lived experiences and convictions,” it said. “This process is not intended to reduce the variety of voices on our campus but to more clearly inform.”
Sey said that statements intended to respect and support people of colour and their lived experiences ring hollow.
“Clearly they only mean the lived experiences of black people that’s approved by Robin DiAngelo (the author of White Fragility) and themselves,” Sey said. “When they say they are allies of people of colour, they really only mean some people.”
He said he did ask the students to feel free to offer criticism.
“I don’t want anyone to be afraid to challenge me because of my skin colour,” he said. “My skin colour does not define truth. As Christians, the Bible is supposed to define what’s true.”
The Ambrose student council said that Sey was vetted, but that they feel the process fell short for this event.
“As a result, we have amended our vetting process so that we may better inform students about topics that are being discussed especially when they may conflict with lived experiences and convictions,” it said. “This process is not intended to reduce the variety of voices on our campus but to more clearly inform.”
Sey said that statements intended to respect and support people of colour and their lived experiences ring hollow.
“Clearly they only mean the lived experiences of black people that’s approved by Robin DiAngelo (the author of White Fragility) and themselves,” Sey said. “When they say they are allies of people of colour, they really only mean some people.”
No comments:
Post a Comment