Syria’s Sharaa hopes for Kurdish deal to prevent conflict

Suleiman Al-Khalidi
Sun, August 17, 2025 


Signing ceremony of a memorandum of understanding for investment in Syria

AMMAN (Reuters) -Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa has expressed hope that his country would avoid military conflict with U.S.-backed Kurdish forces if efforts to integrate their autonomous administration in northeast Syria into the state structure collapse.

In remarks late on Saturday to senior figures from Idlib, where he has mustered loyalist forces, Sharaa said Kurdish leaders had signalled readiness to move forward with a landmark deal in March to bring their Kurdish-run areas under state authority.

But their actions on the ground suggested otherwise, he told the publicised forum.

“At times on the ground there are signals opposite to what they say in the negotiations,” Sharaa said.

Turkey and Washington, the main powers backing the deal to integrate Syria's oil-rich northeast into the state, wanted to resolve the issue peacefully, Sharaa said.

"These parties are pushing for a solution peacefully. I hope we don't enter into a dispute. I am hopeful in a few months we will resolve it," he said.

The collapse of follow-up talks since the March deal has escalated tensions in the region, triggering fresh clashes this month between government troops and the Kurdish-led, U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF).


The SDF, which controls parts of northeast Syria where Arabs form a majority, has recently fortified extensive tunnel networks along the frontlines. Many tribal Arabs accuse the SDF of discriminatory policies - claims Kurdish officials deny.

CONCERN OVER MAJOR ESCALATION

Turkey-backed rebels have also reinforced their positions amid concerns over a potential large-scale escalation in hostilities, officials say.

Ankara has warned of military action against the SDF, whichit considers a terrorist organisation and has targeted in pastcross-border operations. It expects the Syrian government toaddress its security concerns but says it reserves the right tomount an offensive if needed.

U.S. envoy for Syria, Tom Barrack - an advocate for a strong, unified Syrian state - voiced concern last month over Kurdish delays in implementing the March deal, urging faster progress.

Authorities in Damascus reacted earlier this month angrily to a recent SDF conference calling for greater decentralisation and which demanded a review of a constitutional declaration it said discriminated against minorities, a move officials said threatened Syria’s territorial integrity.

Syrian officials said any military push against the SDF would rely on Turkish-backed factions operating in northern Syria, adding that Ankara has grown impatient with what it sees as Kurdish foot-dragging.

Sharaa said those who sought partition were “dreaming” and insisted the country would not give up any stretch of territory. He also criticised Druze groups seeking support from Isrel in their confrontation with Damascus.

Thousands joined a large Druze protest in Sweida on Saturday, demanding self-determination, hoisting Israeli flags and praising Israel for a military intervention that forced Syrian forces to retreat after hundreds of people were killed last month.

Sharaa acknowledged that “violations” had been committed by security forces and army personnel in Sweida, but said Druze militias had also perpetrated crimes.

(Reporting by Suleiman Al-Khalidi; editing by Clelia Oziel)



Sharaa's nightmare is on the verge of realization, and a push could topple his regime

DR. YARON FRIEDMAN
Sun, August 17, 2025 

JERUSALEM POST

Leader of new Syrian administration, Ahmed al Sharaa and Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan (not seen) watch the view of Damascus on Mount Qasioun following their meeting in Damascus, Syria on December 22, 2024

 (photo credit: Murat Gok/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa is in a difficult predicament: he wants complete control over all of Syria but has lost the trust of the minorities.

Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa hoped that everything in Syria would go according to his original plan. He waited in the Idlib province (northwest of the country) under Turkish protection for about nine years since the civil war, and in late 2024, he took advantage of the war in Ukraine and Hezbollah's war against Israel to overthrow the Assad regime in a matter of days, with Russia and Iran's hands tied.

The next step was to take control of all Syria, which seemed like an easy task since, unlike Assad and the top officials of the previous regime—who were from the Alawite minority—Sharia law represents the majority Sunni sect, making up about 70% of the population. So, what's the problem?

Sharaa's men were not content with mere control; they sought revenge. Immediately after seizing power in Damascus in December 2024, massacres against the Alawite community in Sahel (Latakia, Tartus, and Baniyas provinces) began to multiply, culminating in the "Black March." Next in line were the Druze.

In April, Sharaa's men carried out a massacre of Druze in the suburbs of Damascus. The massacre resumed, with greater intensity, in July in the southern province of Sweida. This time, the killings only stopped after the intervention of the IDF.

Senior officials of the new regime repeatedly stated that they had not given orders to carry out these acts and even pledged to prosecute the rebels.

A drone view shows the predominantly Druze city of Sweida, following deadly clashes between Druze fighters, Sunni Bedouin tribes and government forces, in Syria July 25, 2025. (credit: REUTERS/KHALIL ASHAWI/FILE PHOTO)More

But the picture is pretty clear – Sharaa is unable to control the bearded savages he brought with him from Idlib province.

Moreover, if he does punish the criminals, he will severely harm the jihadist camp most loyal to his regime. While the Alawites unanimously oppose Sharaa's rule, the Druze camp appears to be divided. The camp represented by Sheikh Laith al-Balaut believes in talks with Sharaa, out of the perception that the Druze have no choice but to take control of the new Syria. This camp is supported by the Druze in Lebanon, led by Walid Jumblatt, and prefers to maintain ongoing contact with the regime in Damascus.

On the other hand, there is the camp led by Sheikh Hikmat al-Hajri, who, like the Alawite position, completely rejects the option of accepting Sharaa rule. This camp is supported by the Druze in Israel. From al-Hajri's perspective, Sharaa represents a dangerous jihadist movement that sees the Druze (and Alawites) as infidels. There is a lot of truth in this view. The Salafi ideology of most of the people of Sharaa is indeed based on the writings of the Hanbali jurist (the strictest school of thought in Sunni Islam) Ibn Taymiyyah from the 14th century, who ruled that the Alawites (then called Nusayris) and the Druze are infidel sects who have left the fold of Islam and, as traitors, their punishment is death.

The Kurds observe and learn

Although the Kurdish community is largely Sunni, it has a bitter past as a persecuted minority. Furthermore, the Kurds have fought more than any other group against ISIS in Syria and Iraq, and the people of Sharaa remind them of the monsters of the Islamic State.

Indeed, ideologically, the differences between ISIS and the al-Nusra Front (al-Qaeda in Syria) led by Sharaa are not great. In addition, the Kurds are very suspicious of the regime in Damascus, mainly due to its close ties with their main enemy – Turkey, led by President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

At the end of February, Sharaa was still very optimistic about the Kurdish issue. On the 24th-25th of the month, the "Syrian National Dialogue Conference" was held in Damascus, with the participation of most of the country's ethnic groups. The conference supposedly heralded a new Syria of tolerance and inter-ethnic reconciliation. On March 10, Sharaa even met with Mazloum Abdi, the commander of the Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF).

The two parties agreed on the integration of the large Kurdish force (more than a hundred thousand fighters) into the new Syrian army. However, in practice, the implementation of the agreement was delayed and appeared to have been frozen.

The horrific events in the Alawite and Druze regions greatly deterred the Kurds. They watched as the Alawites (the soldiers of the previous regime) handed over their weapons and saw the shortage of weapons that the Druze militias suffered from, and they understood very well the significance of handing over weapons or giving up the independence that the Kurds currently enjoy in the north of the country.

The apparent relationship between the regime in Damascus and the Kurds was shattered in August, following the holding of the "Al-Hasakah Conference" in the Kurdish province, attended by Abdi and senior Kurdish officials, Druze leader Hikmat al-Hajri, and the head of the Syrian Alawite Council, Sheikh Ghazal Ghazal.

The conference was also attended by other minorities who now feel threatened: Christians of various denominations, Turkmens, Armenians, Circassians, and more. The participants' goal was to arouse international sympathy and also to maintain joint pressure on Damascus, regarding the existence of a democratic, egalitarian, and liberal Syria.

The main idea of the conference was decentralization. This meant that Syria would exist as a federation, in which each sect would maintain autonomy under loose control from Damascus. This is the nightmare of the Sharaa regime, which sees it as effectively the disintegration of Syria into regions – Druze in the south, Alawite in the west, and Kurdish in the north.

In practice, this means that the regime in Damascus will only have direct control over about 60% of the country.

Syrian Foreign Minister Asad al-Sheibani was quick to reject the conference's demands outright, emphasizing that all sects in Syria will exist solely under the framework of a united Syria.

A difficult predicament in Syria

Sharaa is now in a difficult predicament: he wants complete control over all of Syria, but in the six months of his rule, he has lost the trust of the minorities.

Arab countries that support the Syrian regime accuse Israel of trying to disintegrate Syria in order to weaken it, as is clearly reflected in the Arab media. Turkey hopes to use the new government in Damascus as a protectorate, which will allow it to strategically control Syria politically.

The principality of Qatar, which hopes to gain a significant share of economic control over Syria, is also concerned about the situation. Al Jazeera commentator Ramadan Bursa recently published an editorial titled "Syria faces a very dangerous situation."

In his article, he explained that a federation is not suitable for a weak and unstable regime like Syria, and that a federal regime can only exist in rich, stable, and successful countries like the US, Britain, and Germany. Bursa warns that a federal regime is very dangerous for Syria's future, and could lead to its weakening and even disintegration.

The regime in Damascus is now on a collision course with all minorities. While the Alawites are defenseless, the Druze are backed by Israel, and the Kurds constitute a large, armed force that still enjoys a kind of American patronage.