Friday, January 07, 2022

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$T COLONIALISM
Billionaire’s looted art still on display at Israel Museum
By ILAN BEN ZION

The Heliodorus Stele, loaned by American billionaire Michael Steinhardt, is displayed at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem, Wednesday, Jan. 5, 2022. Last month, Steinhardt surrendered the artifact, along with 179 others valued at roughly $70 million, as part of a landmark deal with the Manhattan District Attorney's office to avoid prosecution. Eight Neolithic masks loaned by Steinhardt to the Israel Museum for a major exhibition in 2014 were also seized as part of the billionaire's deal with New York authorities. 
(AP Photo/Maya Alleruzzo)



JERUSALEM (AP) — One of the Israel Museum’s biggest patrons, American billionaire Michael Steinhardt, approached the flagship Israeli art institution in 2007 with an artifact he had recently bought: a 2,200-year-old Greek text carved into limestone.

But shortly after it went on display, an expert noticed something odd — two chunks of text found a year earlier during a dig near Jerusalem fit the limestone slab like a jigsaw puzzle. It soon became clear that Steinhardt’s tablet came from the same cave where the other fragments were excavated.

Last month, Steinhardt surrendered the piece, known as the Heliodorus Stele, and 179 other artifacts valued at roughly $70 million as part of a landmark deal with the Manhattan District Attorney’s office to avoid prosecution. Eight Neolithic masks loaned by Steinhardt to the Israel Museum for a major exhibition in 2014 were also seized under the deal, including two that remain exhibited at the museum.

Museums worldwide are facing greater scrutiny over the provenance — or chain of ownership — of their art, particularly those looted from conflict zones or illegally plundered from archaeological sites. There are growing calls for such items to be returned to their countries of origin.

Donna Yates, a criminologist specializing in artifact smuggling at Maastricht University, said that several recent scandals involving looted artifacts — such as the Denver Art Museum’s return of Cambodian antiquities — are “causing museums to reconsider the ownership history of some of the objects that they have.”

“They can’t really afford the public embarrassment of constantly being linked to this kind of thing, because museums aren’t wealthy and many of them hold a place of public trust,” she said.

In addition to the Heliodorus Stele and two of the ancient masks, at least one other Steinhardt-owned artifact in the Israel Museum is of uncertain provenance: a 2,800-year-old inscription on black volcanic stone. The museum’s display states the origin as Moab, an ancient kingdom in modern-day Jordan.

How it got to Jerusalem remains unclear.

Steinhardt gave the Royal Moabite Inscription to the museum on extended loan in 2002, shortly after buying it from a licensed Israel dealer in Jerusalem, said Amir Ganor, who heads the Israel Antiquities Authority’s theft prevention unit.

That dealer, who confirmed the deal but spoke on condition of anonymity because of the legal questions surrounding the item, told The Associated Press that he obtained the inscription from a Palestinian colleague in Bethlehem, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, who didn’t specify its provenance.

“I don’t know how it got to the dealer in Jerusalem,” Ganor said. He said it could have come from the West Bank, neighboring Jordan or through Dubai, a longtime antiquities hub.

The Israel Museum declined interview requests and refused to show the artifact’s documentation.

But in a statement, it denied wrongdoing, saying it “consistently follows the applicable regulations at the time the works are loaned.” It said all displays are “in full cooperation” with the antiquities authority.

The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office said the Moabite Inscription wasn’t part of the Steinhardt investigation and declined to discuss the item.

James Snyder, who was the Israel Museum’s director from 1997 to 2016, said all artifacts coming to the museum have their provenance checked by the IAA before they’re exhibited, and that Steinhardt’s other looted artworks “came with documentation of legal ownership.”

“We were given documentation of legal purchase, it was approved to come in on loan and it was approved to be returned” by the authority, Snyder said.

Israel has a legal antiquities market run by some 55 licensed dealers. They are allowed to sell items discovered before 1978, when a law took effect making all newfound artifacts state property.

This market has provided an outlet for the laundering of smuggled and plundered antiquities from around the Middle East that are given fabricated documentation by dealers in Israel. Israel began closing that loophole in 2016, when it mandated a digital database of dealers’ artifacts.




Eight Neolithic masks loaned by Steinhardt to the Israel Museum for a major exhibition in 2014 were also seized as part of the billionaire's deal with New York authorities. (AP Photo/Maya Alleruzzo)

Israel recently returned smuggled antiquities found in dealers’ stores to Egypt and Libya. Other antiquities stolen from Iraq and Syria — including thousands of cuneiform tablets purchased by Hobby Lobby owner Steve Green in 2010 — were smuggled to Israeli dealers before being sold to collectors with fraudulent documentation.

Morag Kersel, archaeology professor at DePaul University in Illinois, said the wanton plunder of archaeological sites across the Middle East ultimately “is all demand driven.”

“Looters do this because there’s someone like Steinhardt who’s willing to pay money and buy things that come straight out of the ground,” she said.

Under the deal, the Manhattan District Attorney seized 180 of Steinhardt’s artifacts and will repatriate them to their respective countries. Steinhardt also agreed to a lifetime ban from acquiring antiquities — though it is unclear how that ban will be enforced.

Steinhardt, 81, is a longtime patron of the Israel Museum and many other Israeli institutions, including a natural history museum at Tel Aviv University bearing his name. Since 2001, his family foundation has donated over $6.6 million to the Israel Museum, according to partial U.S. tax filings.

Steinhardt was not accused of plundering any items himself and has said he did not commit any crimes. But the DA’s office said he “knew, or should have ascertained by reasonable inquiry” that the antiquities were stolen.

Steinhardt declined an interview request. His office issued a brief statement saying the Manhattan DA “did not challenge Mr. Steinhardt’s right, title, or interest to any of the artifacts” other than those in the settlement.

The DA began investigating Steinhardt’s massive antiquities collection in 2017 after he loaned a Bull’s Head sculpture to the Metropolitan Museum of Art that had been plundered from a site in Lebanon.

The DA says the three items at the Israel Museum are “effectively seized in place,” and has opened talks with Israel to coordinate the return of 28 additional items. It said Steinhardt “has been unable to locate” the final nine items traced to Israel.

Of those 40 artifacts, more than half are believed to have been plundered from West Bank sites, according to court documents. An additional nine artifacts from Jordan, many sold to Steinhardt through Israel’s licensed antiquities market, are also being repatriated.

Neither the Jordanian government nor the Palestinian Tourism and Antiquities Ministry responded to requests for comment. Under interim peace deals in the mid-1990s, the fate of items taken from the occupied West Bank is to be part of a still elusive peace deal.

The Israel Museum said it had only recently learned about the settlement and is currently examining the matter.

For now, the plundered artifacts in the museum still bear Steinhardt’s name.

___

Follow Ilan Ben Zion on Twitter at www.twitter.com/ilanbenzion
Boy Scouts bankruptcy plan falls short of support from sex abuse victims

Victims who'd accused the Boy Scouts of America of sexual misconduct began voting on the proposed settlement last fall, and had until December 28 to turn in their ballots. 
 torbakhopper/Flickr


Jan. 5 (UPI) -- The Boy Scouts of America has fallen short of receiving the necessary support from sex abuse victims for approval of its $2.7 billion bankruptcy reorganization plan.

The proposed settlement covered some 82,200 claims of childhood sexual abuse. Almost 54,000 ballots were cast, according to a preliminary report issued Tuesday night.

The organization said that the plan earned support from about 73% of the victims who cast votes. The mark is just shy of the 75% the BSA had hoped for.

Victims who made claims of sexual misconduct involving the organization began voting on the proposed settlement last fall, and had until Dec. 28 to turn in their ballots.

Typically, bankruptcy courts require two-thirds support for a proposed settlement to be approved. But cases that involve greater liabilities and accusations of sexual abuse usually require more support.

"We are encouraged by these preliminary results and are actively engaging key parties in our case with the hope of reaching additional agreements, which could potentially garner further support for the plan before confirmation," the Boy Scouts of America said, according to The Washington Post.

Tuesday's report is a preliminary count of the results and the final assessment is due Jan. 17.
CRIMINAL CRYPTO CAPITALI$M
Report: Crypto crime hits all-time high in 2021

By UPI Staff

Crypto-related crimes rose to an all-time high in 2021 but haven't outpaced legitimate crypto businesses, according to new data. 
File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo


Jan. 6 (UPI) -- Cryptocurrency crime hit an all-time high in 2021 with illicit addresses receiving $14 billion throughout the year, according to new data from blockchain analytics from Chainanalysis.

The number rose from $7.8 billion the year prior. A spike in theft and scams has resulted in a 79% rise in crypto-related crimes

Total transaction volume grew to $15.8 trillion in 2021, a jump of 567% from the year before. Of that, transactions involving illicit addresses made up 0.15% of the total volume.

Scamming was the greatest form of crypto-based crime, followed by theft.

Chainanalysis said that DeFi is one of the most exciting areas of the cryptocurrency ecosystem, but ripe for scamming and theft.

DeFi transaction volume grew 912% in 2021. DeFi is a sector of the crypto market that cuts out middlemen from traditional financial transactions.

Banks and lawyers are replaced by code called a smart contract, which is written on a public blockchain such as ethereum.

The code then executes when the right conditions are met, though experts caution that there are code vulnerabilities in some newly launched protocols that hackers can exploit.

Though cryptocurrency is at an all-time high, legitimate crypto activity is outpacing criminal usage, Chainanalysis said.
Noam Chomsky: Corporate Patents & Rising Anti-Science Rhetoric Will Prolong Pandemic


GUESTS
Noam Chomsky
world-renowned political dissident, linguist and author.


Today, a special broadcast: an hour with Noam Chomsky, the world-renowned political dissident, linguist and author, who just turned 93 years old. Chomsky spoke to Democracy Now! prior to the discovery of the Omicron coronavirus variant, but he predicted new variants would emerge. “If you let the virus run rampant in poor countries, everyone understands that mutation is likely, the kind of mutation that led to the Delta variant, now the Delta Plus variant in India, and who knows what will develop,” Chomsky said.


Transcript
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.



STORYDECEMBER 30, 2021


AMY GOODMAN: Today, a special broadcast, an hour with Noam Chomsky. The world-renowned political dissident, linguist and author just turned 93 years old. Democracy Now!'s Nermeen Shaikh and I recently interviewed Noam as part of Democracy Now!'s 25th anniversary celebration. Noam Chomsky joined us from his home in Tucson, Arizona, where he teaches at the University of Arizona. We asked him about the state of the pandemic and why so many Americans have refused to get vaccinated.


NOAM CHOMSKY: It’s overwhelmingly a far-right phenomenon. Others have been drawn in. And I think there are many sources. Actually, one of them is probably social media, which does circulate lots of dubious or even false information. And if people are wedded to a particular part of it, that’s what they’ll be fed. But beyond that, there is skepticism, which has justification, about the role of government. Happens to be misplaced in this case, but you can understand the origins of the skepticism.


And it’s not just the pandemic. Much worse than that are the attitudes of skepticism about global warming. So, one rather shocking fact that I learned recently is that during the Trump years, among Republicans, the belief that global warming is a serious problem — not even an urgent problem, just a serious problem — declined about 20%. That’s very serious. Here we’re talking not just about the spread of a pandemic, but about marching over the precipice and ending the prospects for sustained, organized human life. That’s the kind of thing we’re facing. Well, you can talk about the origins of the skepticism, but it has to be dealt with and overcome, and very decisively and without delay, or else the whole human species and all the others that we are casually destroying will be in severe danger.


AMY GOODMAN: Noam, can you talk about how you think that skepticism can be overcome — I mean, you, yourself, a serious critic of the corporate-government alliance — why people should trust large pharmaceutical companies like Moderna and Pfizer, that are making billions, why in this case we should trust that vaccines will save the population?


NOAM CHOMSKY: If the information came from Pfizer and Moderna, there would be no reason to trust it. But it just happens that 100% of health agencies throughout the world and the vast majority of the medical profession and the health sciences accept the actually quite overwhelming evidence that vaccination radically reduces onset of infection and deaths. The evidence on that is very compelling. And it’s therefore not surprising that it’s basically universally accepted by relevant authorities. So, yes, if we heard it just from Big Pharma PR, there would be every reason for skepticism. But you can look at the data. They’re available. And you can — when you do so, you can understand why there is essentially universal acceptance among the agencies that have no stake in the matter other than trying to save lives. You can understand why poor African countries who weren’t paid off by Big Pharma are pleading for vaccines. Their health agencies are.


And, in fact, the only exception I noted about this, apart from Trump for a period, was Bolsonaro’s Brazil, and he is now being under charges of a long senatorial investigation for charges of crimes against humanity for his failure to follow the normal protocol of trying to maximize the use of vaccines. Now that his reticence, reluctance on this matter has been overturned, it’s having the usual effect. Vaccinations are increasing, and incidence of disease and deaths is sharply declining. That correlation is so clear that it takes a real strange refusal to look at facts to see it. And again, as I say, health agencies throughout world are uniform and agreed with the medical profession on the efficacy of vaccines.


There are other things that have to be done: social distancing, care, masking in crowded places. There are measures that have to be taken. Countries where these measures have been followed carefully are doing quite well. But where there’s a high level of skepticism, whatever its roots, there are serious problems.


AMY GOODMAN: And what do you think the U.S. should do to ensure that countries get vaccines around the world, not only for altruistic reasons, but because you can’t end this pandemic here or anywhere unless these vaccines get out everywhere? And I’m talking about Moderna and Pfizer. Moderna, the U.S. gave billions to. Pfizer, the U.S. promised to purchase so much. And both corporations, among others, have made billions. And yet, what can the U.S. do to ensure that these vaccines can be made in other places, like requiring that Moderna release the recipe? Still they will make a fortune. What has Biden not done that would allow people to have access to these life-saving vaccines?


NOAM CHOMSKY: I should say that Europe’s record is even worse than that of the United States. Biden has made some effort, but the wealthy countries have not, including the United States, though not primarily the United States — they have not taken measures that are within their capacity to ensure that other countries that have the resources to produce vaccines will have access not only to the products, the vaccines, but also to the process of manufacturing them.


We should recognize that the World Trade Organization rules, instituted mainly in the 1990s largely under U.S. initiative, they are radically protectionist, radically anti-free market. They provide protection to major corporations, Big Pharma, not only for the products they produce but to the processes by which they produce them. And that patent can easily be broken. The governments have the capacity to insist that the processes be available and that vaccines be distributed to the countries that need it.


First of all, this will save uncounted numbers of lives. And, as you said, it means saving ourselves. If you let the virus run rampant in poor countries, everyone understands that mutation is likely, the kind of mutation that led to the Delta variant, now the Delta Plus variant in India, and who knows what will develop. Could be a — we’ve been kind of lucky so far. The coronaviruses have been either highly lethal and not too contagious, like Ebola, or highly contagious but not too lethal, like COVID-19. But the next one coming down the pike might be both, might even be nonsuppressible by vaccines.


We know the measures that have to be taken to try to prevent this from happening: research, preparations, health systems that work. It’s not a small point. Like, there are now new antivirals coming along which don’t stop the disease but prevent hospitalization. But you have to have a functioning health system. Very hard to see how these could even be usable in the United States, where the health system simply is not organized in such a way that people can get access to what they need.


NERMEEN SHAIKH: You yourself have experienced the ruinous effect of low vaccination rates in certain states, where hospitals have been unable to provide regular services because all the beds are taken up with COVID patients. Earlier this year, you needed hospital care but were unable to access a facility because all the beds were taken with COVID patients. Could you explain where this happened and what exactly happened?


NOAM CHOMSKY: Well, don’t want to go into the details, but I had something which was severe, couldn’t get to the hospital where my doctors are. They were overwhelmed with patients. Had to go to a couple other hospitals, and finally they managed. So, you know, it’s not the worst case by any means. I should say that even getting a booster shot was not easy. My wife was trying for — Valeria — for weeks simply to try to get an appointment. The system — I’m lucky. I’m relatively privileged. For others, it’s much worse.


Hospitals are overflowing, with almost 100% unvaccinated patients in regions of the country, which are mostly red states, which have been reluctant and unwilling to carry out appropriate measures. Hospitals have been forced to cancel regular procedures just because of the crush of almost entirely unvaccinated patients filling beds. There’s a lot of extra deaths, enormous social costs. And all of this is under control. We know how to deal with it. It’s a social malady, a breakdown of the social and cultural order, which is very serious in the pandemic case, but, as I want to keep stressing, far more serious in the case of environmental destruction. And we don’t have much time there. We can survive pandemics at enormous cost. We’re not going to survive environmental destruction.

AMY GOODMAN: Noam Chomsky, the 93-year-old world-renowned political dissident, linguist and author. When we come back, we talk about the climate emergency, the rise of proto-fascism in the United States and more.

The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. 

This is viewer supported news. Please do your part today.DONATE

Next story from this daily show

Africa: Widespread Use of DDT for Malaria Control Worries Environmentalist

Share

A feeding female Anopheles stephensi mosquito. A. stephensi is a known vector for the parasitic disease malaria.

The call for a total ban of DDT (dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane), a synthetic insecticide used in malaria-endemic countries that causes harm to the environment and human body, has sparked a debate.

Some people canvass its anti-malarial benefits while others cite its harmful effects on the environment and human health. It is banned in some countries even as many others use it to control mosquitoes that cause malaria.

Now, Prof Bontle Mbongwe, a Botswana academic and associate professor of Environmental Health and Toxicology at the University of Botswana, has joined the debate.

Any decision to ban DDT should be supported by evidence from an assessment of its risks to human health and the environment, Prof Mbongwe says, in an interview with Africa Renewal.

Cumulative evidence suggests that DDT and other pyrethroids (man-made pesticides) could have negative impacts on pregnancy, she warns, adding that, "Pyrethroids have also been linked to increased cases of mortality and an adverse effect on the cardiovascular system."

She suggests an in-depth study of the levels of DDT in breastmilk.

In addition, she laments that "The health impacts from exposure to persistent organic pollutants such as DDT are more acute in developing countries, especially on women and children's health.

"Because DDT does not degrade, it remains intact in the environment for many years; therefore, human beings and the environment are exposed to its toxic effects, some of which may affect the development of children.

"Even more concerning, DDT is transported through the environment and across boundaries through the soil, water, and especially air," she says.

Generally, the decision to use or ban DDT often depends on factors such as the cost-effectiveness of the alternatives, their hazardous properties and their impact on human health and the environment.

The environmentalist is among the newest members of the DDT Expert Group established under the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, an international environmental treaty signed in May 2004 that aims to eliminate and restrict the production and use of persistent organic pollutants.

DDT is one of the organic pollutants listed under the Convention.

The expert group handles the assessment of scientific, technical, environmental and economic information on the production and use of DDT and other alternatives for disease vector control.

"My role as a member of the expert group is to make sure that the government of Botswana, and other governments still using DDT, are advised appropriately based on science," she says.

Prof Mbongwe comes from a malaria-prevalent region; she seems to prefer a limited use of DDT, currently only permissible under the Stockholm Convention, in controlling the disease vectors, with recommendations and guidelines of the World Health Organisation, and when safe and affordable alternatives are not available locally.

This limited permission could be a first step toward containing the widespread use of DDT given the difficulty in eliminating its use immediately.

The good news is that the global use of DDT for disease vector control declined from 10 countries using it for Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) in 2010 to five countries in 2019.

Prof Mbongwe undertook a comprehensive study of DDT in Botswana in 2000, measuring its concentrations and metabolites in water, plants, invertebrates and fish from selected lagoons in the large Okavango Delta where DDT has been used for approximately 50 years for malaria control and to treat African sleeping sickness.

Before then, in 2009, she collaborated with other researchers to analyze DDT and other pesticides in water where low levels of DDT metabolites were detected.

On the transition to alternative malaria control strategies, she says that training, financial support and research capacitation are needed, but noted that some organisations were already providing such assistance.

"For example, in terms of training, WHO continues to provide guidelines for malaria vector control which cover core and supplementary interventions, personal protection and other measures. WHO also provides support through the development of technical and operational guidelines," she says.

Still, countries often have limited capacity for entomological surveillance, insecticide-resistance monitoring and vector control, which are critical for programmes relying on IRS or Insecticide Treated Nets with few modes of action.

International organizations such as the UN Environment Programme, the UN Industrial Development Organization, the Global Environment Facility and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation are providing additional financial support for countries.

In terms of technology and research, efforts to develop new tools for malaria vector control are encouraged through collaboration between researchers and operational programme staff.

For alternative methods, Prof Mbongwe notes that insecticide-treated nets for control and elimination of malaria have increased in recent years, effectively reducing the reliance on DDT.

Countries in sub-Saharan Africa are shifting from DDT and pyrethroids to more organophosphate chemicals neonicotinoids.

Some countries' increased capacities for insecticide-resistance monitoring have led to improvements in the detection of DDT resistance, which, in turn, have encouraged other countries to consider non-DDT insecticides for IRS, Prof Mbongwe maintains.

"There is also a shift toward developing national strategies on IRM [Insecticide Resistance Management] for disease vectors. Finally, countries are taking measures to develop and implement Integrated Vector Management, and this can potentially reduce reliance on DDT and other chemical insecticides for disease vector control," she further explains.

Prof. Mbongwe will serve in the DDT Expert Group for five years. During her tenure, she hopes to advocate improving public education and research on chemical safety, which is limited in Botswana and other developing countries.

"I will work with other researchers and government officials to monitor pesticide residues in food with a focus on DDT," she assures.

She also plans to work with countries' ministries of environment, agriculture and health to sensitize the public on the use of DDT and other pesticides.

Such an intervention could be timely for countries, including Botswana, that are promoting agriculture and supplying farmers with pesticides.

Greenpeace installs 'last voting booth' in South Korea to highlight climate crisis
JAN. 6, 2022 
A campaigner from Greenpeace Korea holds up a signboard Thursday advocating stronger climate policies including a total phase-out of coal plants by 2030. 
Photo by Thomas Maresca/UPI

SEOUL, Jan. 6 (UPI) -- Greenpeace Korea unveiled what it called the "last voting booth" in downtown Seoul on Thursday as part of a campaign to bring climate issues to the foreground of South Korea's presidential election in March.

The booth, a tattered replica of a traditional polling machine, was placed near the city's iconic Gyeongbokgung Palace to raise awareness that this election "could be the last vote to stop the climate crisis in Korean political history," the environmental group said in a statement.

A video loop inside the booth showed a simulation of the palace submerged under flooding due to extreme weather and rising sea levels.

"We think that climate change is one of the most important issues to be discussed during the presidential campaign," Daul Jang, government relations and advocacy specialist for Greenpeace Korea, told UPI. "So we wanted to show people that unless we address climate change, as soon as possible and as ambitiously as possible, our future is at risk right now."

South Korea remains heavily dependent on fossil fuels for its energy needs, generating around 40% of its electricity from coal and only 6.5% from renewable sources.

The country has pledged to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050. President Moon Jae-in introduced a $60 billion Green New Deal in 2020 to invest in eco-friendly industries and technologies. Moon also committed in November to reduce the country's greenhouse gas emissions by at least 40% by 2030, a significant upgrade from the previous target of 26%.

However, Greenpeace and other climate watchdogs say South Korea's goals are not nearly enough to meet the demands of the 2015 Paris Climate Accords, which aim to limit global warming to no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels in order to avoid environmental catastrophe.

The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released a report in August that Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called a "code red for humanity," saying that the earth was already "perilously close" to the 1.5-degree threshold and required bold and immediate action.

Greenpeace Korea released a seven-point climate policy agenda, which includes raising the ratio of renewable energy to 50% and completely phasing out coal plants by 2030, and has asked the presidential candidates to respond.

Yoon Suk-yeol, the candidate from the opposition People Power Party, has indicated support for South Korea's 2050 carbon-neutrality goal, while Lee Jae-myung from Moon's Democratic Party has proposed moving the target up by 10 years and establishing a carbon tax.

Jang said that neither of the two major candidates has been specific enough with their plans, however, and noted that climate change has been an afterthought on the campaign trail and media coverage. Greenpeace is calling for the candidates to hold climate-focused television debates.

The environmental group also warned Thursday of the perils to South Korea's economic bottom line posed by climate change. It shared a Deloitte Korea report that estimated the South Korean economy could lose a total of $780 billion by the year 2070 if it fails to adequately respond to the climate crisis, while aggressive action could add over $1.9 trillion in that same time period.

Climate change "is not considered as important as security or economic issues, even though the climate crisis itself is a serious national security and national economic issue," Jang said. "This is the last Korean election for us to properly address climate change in time."

INDIA
Arabica Coffee Prices Hit All-time High in December, Small Farmers Still Unable to Cash in

Heavy rainfall and crop damage have resulted in losses for small farmers who largely grow Robusta coffee.

Nikhil Cariappa
06 Jan 2022

Ripening coffee berries

The district of Kodagu (Coorg) is rich in forests and wildlife. Due to conservation efforts, industries were not permitted to be set up here. Agriculture, especially coffee planting, has been the backbone of the Kodagu economy. The states of Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu account for 83% of the coffee production in India. Karnataka alone accounts for 70% of the production. However, this cash crop has provided diminishing returns to farmers over the last three years. In December 2021, Arabica coffee prices hit an all-time high. However, the benefits have not been passed on to small farmers in Kodagu because they largely grow Robusta. They have also been forced to endure losses caused by heavy rainfall, crop damage by wild animals, and increasing input and labour costs.


THE ECONOMICS OF COFFEE CULTIVATION

In India, two varieties of coffee are cultivated - Arabica and Robusta. Arabica fetches a higher price in the market as it is considered to have a better flavour. The harvest season for Arabica lasts from November to January, and for Robusta, from January to March. In India, Robusta accounts for 70% of the total production. Small farmers prefer to grow Robusta because the yield is higher and the maintenance cost is comparatively lower. High and unseasonal rainfall caused the coffee berries to drop off the branches this year. Once the unripe berries of Robusta coffee have prematurely dropped, it is no longer of any value to the planter.

After the harvest, the berries are dried in the sun, bagged and sold to the traders. Each bag of coffee contains 50 kgs of produce. The price/bag varies daily based on the commodity markets in New York (for Arabica) and London (for Robusta). Coffee farmers are dependent on foreign markets because almost 80% of the coffee produced in India is exported.

On December 27, 2021, the prices/bag of raw coffee were -


These prices refer to the value of one bag of raw coffee that distributers/trading companies pay to coffee farmers. According to several farmers, under ideal conditions, one acre of coffee plantation could yield 20-30 bags of Robusta cherry or 10-15 bags of Arabica cherry. Cherry coffee is obtained through dry processing. Parchment coffee is obtained through wet processing.

Cherry coffee is obtained once the ripe coffee berries are harvested and dried in the sun. To obtain parchment coffee, the ripe berries must be pulped, washed and dried. Small farmers with insufficient access to water resources opt for cherry. Processing the berries into parchment is expensive, time-consuming, labour intensive, requires lots of water and a facility for disposing of effluents (by-products).

Global Market


A cursory look at the commodity market charts for Arabica Coffee indicates that coffee prices hit a 34-year high in 2011. Before that, it peaked in 1997, 1986 and 1977. Various speculations were made about the reasons for the price rise, including policy changes and natural disasters. Since this is a global market, farmers in India compete with their counterparts in Brazil, Colombia, Vietnam, Indonesia, Honduras, and Ethiopia. If there are supply shortages in any other part of the world, it benefits Indian farmers. Similarly, when coffee prices crashed in 2001, the effects were felt by farmers all over the world, prompting some introspection about the beneficiaries of the present model.

INPUT COSTS

Fertilisers, diesel and labour make up the bulk of the input costs. NewsClick spoke to KK Vishwanath, a planter from Katakeri, about the input costs/acre of the planted area. He said, “For Robusta coffee, the labour requirement is 50 labour days/acre/year. The labour cost may add up to Rs 35000 and other inputs come up to Rs 15000. The farmer spends a minimum of Rs 50000/acre/year."

In the past, the farmers relied on the local tribal communities to make up the labour force on the plantations. But they have been migrating out of the district to find work in other sectors. According to Vishwanath, farmers now rely on migrant labour from West Bengal and Assam. In the past, there have been cycles of migrant labour from Bihar, Jharkhand, Kerala and even Tamils from Sri Lanka.

STAGNANT COFFEE PRICES

The farmers say that the prices of Robusta coffee have not increased at par with the rise in the cost of inputs. To make a comparison with the previous table, on December 9, 2013, the prices/bag of raw coffee were as follows-


In 2013, the diesel price in Karnataka was a little more than Rs 50/ltr. In 2021, the price had breached Rs 100/ltr. The cost of labour has doubled as well. In 2013, the minimum wage/day was Rs 142 in Karnataka. Today, it is Rs 357. While most costs have doubled, the coffee prices have seen a meagre rise. The price of coffee fluctuates every year, but costs always increase.

Land Holding


According to a source in the Indian Coffee Board, the largest commercial holding in Kodagu belongs to Tata Coffee Limited, which owns more than 10,000 acres of the planted area. Tata Coffee, a listed company, had announced annual revenue of Rs 2289 crore for the FY 2020-2021. This figure represents earnings from estates all over India, including those in Karnataka and Tamil Nadu. The second-largest holding in Kodagu belongs to the Bombay Burma Trading Corporation (BBTC), owned by the Wadia Group. According to the company website, the corporation owns 927 hectares (2290 acres) of planted area in Kodagu. BBTC is also a publicly traded corporation.

According to the Indian coffee board, as of 2019-2020, Kodagu had 43765 holdings or coffee estates. A majority of them were under 10 hectares (24 acres) in size. Only 519, or 1.1% of the total estates in Kodagu, were larger than 10 hectares in area. The bulk of the estates are family run and often passed down through inheritance.

Crop Damage


Planters in Kodagu have appealed to the district administration to find a solution for losses caused by monkeys and wild boars. BB Madayya, a planter from Chettalli village, lamented the problems caused by small animals. “When the arabica coffee is ripe and ready for harvest, swarms of monkeys enter the plantations and break the branches of coffee plants to suck out the sweet pulp inside the berries. This is a loss for the planter in the present year and the future because we lose the coffee seeds, and the branch will also take time to grow back”, he said.

A typical coffee plant takes 5-7 years to grow and provide any economic yield to the planter. Once destroyed, it results in long term economic consequences. The Codava Planters Association have floated a signature campaign to garner support online and pressure the Forest Department to take action. They hope that like in Bihar, monkeys and wild boars are temporarily classified as vermin so that their numbers can be reduced.

As per the organisation, “wild boars destroy the paddy fields. They also destroy the coffee, cardamom and pepper vine roots by digging the ground searching for food during monsoon season. In addition, they also dig up roots, tubers & young saplings and, in the process, loosen the soil resulting in soil erosion. Wild boars contaminate water sources with the faecal matter with very high bacterial content”.

Brazil is the world’s largest producer of coffee, while Vietnam has recently emerged as the largest producer of Robusta Coffee globally. According to Vishwanath, farmers there practise the field-grown technique of farming in open spaces. Expansion of coffee production in these countries was done through deforestation. Their counterparts in India practise shade-grown coffee cultivation, which is sustainable but offers lower returns. In Karnataka, all the coffee cultivation is done in three districts - Kodagu, Chikmagalur and Hassan. All three districts have forest cover, and the farming has not come at the expense of trees and biodiversity. Every trade-off comes with a cost.
SPACE JUNK
Debris from failed Russian rocket falls into sea near French Polynesia
By Doug Cunningham

A Russian Ankara-A5 heavy-lift rocket test launches from the Plesetsk space center in northwestern Russia. Photo courtesy of Russian Defense Ministry/TASS

Jan. 6 (UPI) -- The upper stage of a failed Russian Angara A5 rocket plummeted uncontrolled to Earth, crashing into open sea near French Polynesia.

The U.S. 18th Space Control Squadron confirmed the 4 p.m. Wednesday re-entry

The Persei upper stage was part of a heavy-lift rocket. The debris weighed an estimated 3.5 tons. Astronomer Jonathon McDowell of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics said most of it likely burned up in Earth's atmosphere before it hit the water.

The Russian rocket was launched Dec. 27. It was the third test flight, but that upper stage failed, causing the uncontrolled re-entry.

Space debris like this failed Russian rocket is a serious issue that has threatened the International Space Station.

In November, the astronauts aboard the ISS had to take shelter as debris from a Russian anti-satellite missile test passed closeby.

Three months ago, NASA administrators called on Congress to fund a comprehensive strategy for debris tracking and management, including international outreach.
BEWARE OF FALLING ROCK
Weather satellite detects meteor explosion near Pittsburgh on first day of 2022
By Brian Lada, Accuweather.com

It wasn't unclear if any pieces of the exploded meteor reached the ground. If fragments did land on Earth, officials say, they would likely be somewhere southwest of downtown Pittsburgh, Pa. File Photo by Archie Carpenter/UPI | License Photo


Jan. 6 -- The new year started off with an audible bang near Pittsburgh when the sound of a distant explosion echoed high in the sky, puzzling residents who were outside during the harmless blast.

Around 11:30 a.m. EST last Saturday, NOAA's GOES-16 weather satellite detected lightning over southeastern Pennsylvania, but there were no thunderstorms in the area to trigger a lightning flash. At the same time, people across the region reported a loud sound that was even picked up by some home security cameras.

Had it happened 12 hours earlier, the explosion may have been confused with fireworks being set off prematurely before the start of 2022, but scientists at NASA and NOAA believe that the sound did not originate from humans.

After looking over all of the data, NASA concluded that the explosion was caused by a meteor about 3 feet across and "with a mass close to half a ton" exploding as it entered Earth's atmosphere.

According to NASA, the meteor was traveling around 45,000 mph and exploded with the energy of 30 tons of TNT.

"Had it not been cloudy, the fireball would have been easily visible in the daylight sky," NASA said, adding that it would have been around 100 times brighter than a full moon.


It is unclear if any pieces of the space rock reached the ground, but if fragments did land on Earth, they would likely be somewhere southwest of Pittsburgh.

No damage or injuries were reported.

Meteor explosions like this are rare, but not completely unheard of. In mid-September, a similar event was detected over West Virginia when a meteor exploded over the region.

RELATED Amazon helps develop Alexa-like Callisto system for Artemis moon mission

On Oct. 3, a woman in western Canada was startled awake by a meteorite that crashed through her house. The softball-sized rock came to rest in her bed, just inches away from where she was laying.

People who spot an incredibly bright meteor, sometimes referred to as a fireball, can file a report with the American Meteor Society. Fireballs are not always accompanied by a sonic boom, but can illuminate the entire sky for a few seconds in what is described as a "once in a lifetime event."

 Rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations globally affect photosynthesis of peat-forming mosses

Rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations globally affect photosynthesis of peat-forming mosses
Global changes in the deuterium isotopomer ratio (ΔD6S/D6RN) of Sphagnum during the
 twentieth century representing changes in the photorespiration to photosynthesis ratio. 
(A) Global distribution of investigated sites. (B) Response of the D6S/D6R ratio per unit 
change in 1000/[CO2] between modern and historical Sphagnum samples (ΔD6S/D6RN). 
Five water table depths (WT) categories (in cm) are indicated by vertical dashed lines. 
Sphagnum subgenera are indicated on the x-axis by gray/white shading: AC, ACUTIFOLIA
 (dark gray); CU, CUSPIDATA (light gray); SP, SPHAGNUM (white).
 Error bars indicate standard error, n = 1–4 (see Table S1 for more information). 
Numbers above error bars correspond to sample sites as numbered in (A). 
Credit: DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02953-1

Scientists at Umeå University and Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences have developed ways to decipher effects of the CO2 rise during the past 100 years on metabolic fluxes of the key plant species in peatlands, mosses. Analyses of cellulose in peat cores collected by collaborating scientists working in five continents indicate that a CO2-driven increase in photosynthesis of mosses is strongly dependent on the water table, which may change the species composition of peat moss communities.

As human CO2 emissions continue, it is increasingly important to capture CO2 to mitigate the associated climate change. Peatlands are the largest soil carbon stores globally, but the impact of climate change on peatlands is still unknown. During the 20th century, global atmospheric CO2 concentrations have increased by nearly 50 percent and further increases are inevitable according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC, with severe consequences for humanity. So far, uptake of CO2 by the land biosphere has dampened the CO2 rise and prevented even more severe effects.

Although peatlands cover only three percent of the global land surface, they store a third of the global soil carbon. Thus, uptake of CO2 by peat mosses is important, but little is known about how their physiology is affected by rising CO2 levels. To understand if peatlands will keep storing carbon and mitigate climate change in the future, the scientists investigated peat mosses' responses to the increase in atmospheric CO2.

For the study, collaborating researchers from five continents collected peat cores from ten locations worldwide. In a novel use of nuclear magnetic resonance pectroscopy, distributions of the stable hydrogen isotope deuterium in cellulose of modern and century-old peat mosses were then compared. This allowed us to reconstruct changes in photosynthetic efficiency during the 20th century, by estimating the impact of photorespiration, a side reaction of photosynthesis.

"Photorespiration is critical for the carbon balance of plants because it reduces the efficiency of photosynthesis by up to 35 percent, and it is suppressed by increasing CO2 but accelerated by increasing temperature," says Jürgen Schleucher, Professor at Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics at Umeå University, Sweden.

The analysis revealed that increasing CO2 during the last 100 years has reduced photorespiration, which has probably boosted carbon storage in peatlands to date and dampened climate change. However, increasing atmospheric CO2 only reduced photorespiration in peatlands when  were intermediate, not when conditions were too wet or too dry. Unlike higher plants, mosses cannot transport , so the water table level controls their moisture content, which affects their photosynthetic performance. So, models based on higher plants' physiological responses cannot be applied.

That the effect of CO2 depends on the water table level can have major consequences for  species composition, as only mosses that grow at an intermediate distance from the water table level benefit from the higher atmospheric CO2 concentration. Moreover, changes in the peatlands' water balance can strongly affect their future carbon balance as too wet or too dry conditions reduce peat mosses' ability to scavenge carbon.

Although peatlands have dampened CO2-driven climate change so far, the changes have already had devastating effects. If human CO2 emissions are not strongly reduced, the atmospheric CO2 concentration will further increase by hundreds of ppm by 2100, and average global temperatures will rise several degrees C above pre-industrial levels. It is unclear how peatlands will be affected by this.

"To get a clearer picture of photorespiration's importance for peat mosses and peat carbon accumulation, the next step is to transfer our data into tailored photosynthesis models to estimate global peatland  fluxes. Future CO2 levels, temperature rises, changes in precipitation and  levels will all need to be considered to forecast peatlands' fate in a changing climate," says Jürgen Schleucher.

The study has been published in Scientific Reports.Valuable peatlands at risk of disappearing

More information: Henrik Serk et al, Global CO2 fertilization of Sphagnum peat mosses via suppression of photorespiration during the twentieth century, Scientific Reports (2021). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02953-1

Journal information: Scientific Reports 

Provided by Umea University