Sunday, November 26, 2023

UK
London's march against anti-semitism poses difficult questions for the left



People take part in a march against antisemitism organised by the volunteer-led charity Campaign Against Antisemitism at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. Picture date: Sunday November 26, 2023.

EDITORIAL

TODAY’S mass London demonstration against anti-semitism raises critical questions for the left.

It saw tens of thousands march in what has been called the biggest mobilisation of the Jewish community since the Battle of Cable Street in 1936.

Politically it looked nothing like that heroic chapter in the East End’s history. Cable Street was unambiguously of the left, organised by communist and socialist Jews. It was anti-Establishment, taking on a police-sanctioned march by Oswald Mosley’s Blackshirts, and in defiance of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, which advised Jewish people to stay at home.

That was obviously not the case today, on a march attended by Boris Johnson.

The charity that organised it, the Campaign Against Anti-semitism, rose to prominence as one of the most virulent opponents of Jeremy Corbyn’s socialist leadership of the Labour Party, and was criticised at the time for platforming racist voices so long as they were directed against him.

That said, the campaign clearly rejected race-baiting rabble-rouser Tommy Robinson’s attempt to associate himself with today’s demo.

And the numbers attending point to real concern among British Jews that anti-semitism is on the rise.

It is catastrophic for the left, which has always led the anti-racist struggle, if Jewish communities do not trust it to defend them against anti-semitism.

It opens up space for cynical Tories like Johnson to pose as opponents of anti-semitism to advance reactionary political agendas.

And it facilitates a very traditional divide-and-rule tactic turning minority communities against each other. Campaign Against Anti-semitism chief executive Gideon Falter must be accused of this for remarks which echo Suella Braverman’s efforts to smear Palestine solidarity demos as anti-semitic: “We have witnessed mass criminality, including glorification of terrorism, support for banned terrorist organisations such as Hamas…”

Britain is not alone in facing this dilemma. This month the French left was split on how to respond to a national demonstration called against anti-semitism by leading figures in the French state, in which the far-right National Rally of Marine Le Pen took part.

The French Communist Party marched, holding that opposition to anti-semitism was non-negotiable and should not be conceded to the right. Jean-Luc Melenchon’s France Unbowed did not, arguing that the demo was an attempt to conflate anti-semitism with opposition to Israel’s brutal assault on Gaza and whitewash the French government’s appalling record of Islamophobic racism. Both had a point.

We must reject any hierarchy of racisms. The oppressed and dispossessed deserve justice, and silence in order to avoid offence is cowardice. Attitudes like that of Margaret Hodge, who once claimed there was a “fine line” between support for Palestinian national rights and anti-semitism, are a dereliction of duty.

We should also oppose those smearing Muslims as anti-semitic, a tactic deployed by the right to justify racist immigration and policing policies in the name of opposition to racism.

But the left must also work to earn the confidence of Jewish communities that we will not tolerate any expression of anti-semitism.

That does not mean failing to challenge malicious accusations like so many levelled at Corbyn and his supporters.

It does mean calling out conspiracy theories, rejecting any conflation of Jewish people with the actions of the state of Israel, and confronting those who from ignorance or prejudice perpetuate tropes about Jews’ supposed financial or political influence.

It means rebuilding a mass anti-racist movement with prominent Jewish voices alongside those of black and other oppressed minorities. Jews have among the proudest histories of socialist internationalism.

Only if our anti-racism is comprehensive and consistent can we reclaim leadership of a struggle against anti-semitism that ruling-class and state actors misrepresent for their own ends. The profile of today’s march suggests this will not be easy, but it must be done



Pro-Palestinian Jews distance themselves as tens of thousands join ‘march against anti-semitism’


People take part in a march against antisemitism organised by the volunteer-led charity Campaign Against Antisemitism in central London. Picture date: Sunday November 26, 2023.


BERNY TORRE
MORNINGSTAR
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2023


A MARCH against anti-semitism that drew tens of thousands was denounced last night as a “march against Palestinian freedom” by pro-Palestinian Jews.

Celebrities and politicians joined large crowds in the demonstration in London, including Chief Rabbi Sir Ephraim Mirvis, former prime minister Boris Johnson, Immigration Minister Robert Jenrick and Security Minister Tom Tugendhat.

English Defence League founder Tommy Robinson, 40, was also present, though was arrested close to the Royal Courts of Justice and escorted away by police, with organisers having made clear in advance that he was not welcome.

Jews for Justice for Palestinians executive member Richard Kuper told the Morning Star: “We support those who will be attending out of a genuine concern for anti-semitism. But this march is not a march against anti-semitism.”

He said the charity that organised the march, Campaign Against Anti-semitism (CAA), “has unceasingly demonised the marches of protest against Israel’s genocidal attack on Gaza.

“Its march today is in effect a march against Palestinian freedom, using Jewish safety as the pretext,” he added.

“Those who identify Israel’s war on Gaza as a war on behalf of Jews worldwide — and the leaders of British communal institutions often do just this: eliding the distinction between Jews and zionists — are guilty of encouraging the very elision they rightly deplore when Jews are attacked as responsible for Israel’s actions.”

Over 200,000 pro-Palestinian protesters marched from Park Lane to Whitehall to demand a permanent truce in Gaza on Saturday.

CAA chief Gideon Falter claimed: “Week after week, central London has become a no-go zone for Jews,” though Jewish organisations have been prominent on the Palestine solidarity demos.

“This is why today’s march, drawing over 100,000 people in the largest gathering against anti-semitism since the Battle of Cable Street a lifetime ago in 1936, was so important.”

But Na’amod, a movement of British Jews against the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip, said it could not attend yesterday’s march “in good faith, because we know this march is not just about anti-semitism.

“It’s clear from the event description that CAA have organised this march in response to the huge weekly ceasefire demonstrations in London,” it said.

“There are many laudable, beautiful ways of showing solidarity with Jews facing anti-semitism. These do not include smearing those mobilising for a ceasefire and Palestinian freedom — Jewish and non-Jewish — as inherently anti-semitic.”

Palestine Solidarity Campaign director Ben Jamal added: “The truth is, it is a march against Palestinian rights and pro the maintenance of Israel’s system of apartheid.”


100,000 attend UK’s largest protest against antisemitism since Battle of Cable Street

Boris Johnson is among the high-profile figures at the gathering and speakers include Chief Rabbi Sir Ephraim Mirvis and immigration minister Robert Jenrick

The march is led by Eddie Marsan, Rachel Reilly, Vanessa Feltz, Maureen Lipman amongst others - Anti-semistism protest march. Credit: Guy Bell/Alamy Live News
The march is led by Eddie Marsan, Rachel Reilly, Vanessa Feltz, Maureen Lipman amongst others - Anti-
semistism protest march. Credit: Guy Bell/Alamy Live News

An estimated 100,000 people attended a march against antisemitism in London from the Strand to Westminster.

Former prime minister Boris Johnson was among the high-profile figures joining the demonstration, a day after crowds also gathered in the capital to demand a ceasefire in the Gaza conflict.\


Those who addressed the marchers included Chief Rabbi Sir Ephraim Mirvis and immigration minister Robert Jenrick, as organisers claimed the pro-Palestinian rallies in recent weeks had made the capital a “no-go zone for Jews”.

The start of Sunday’s march saw English Defence League founder Tommy Robinson, real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, arrested by police after he tried to join marchers.

Organisers called the rally the largest gathering against antisemitism London had seen since the Battle of Cable Street in 1936, when hundreds of thousands of people blocked a planned march by Sir Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists through an area populated by many Jewish families.

It was organised by the charity Campaign Against Antisemitism amid fears about rising antisemitic incidents sparked by the crisis in the Middle East.

Sir Ephraim told the crowd: “Since October 7 we have witnessed here in the UK an alarming rise of antisemitism, but we will not be intimidated.

Participants marching from the Strand to Westminster.

“We call for a strengthening of community cohesion and we will forever be proud to champion the finest of British values. So with regard to the poisonous spread of antisemitism, what should the response of the British people be?

“Number one, call it out when you see it. Number two, call it by what it really is – Jew hatred. Number three, be vigilant and report every incident. Number four, we must arrest every single perpetrator and bring every single one of them to justice.”

Tracy-Ann Oberman (left) and Rachel Riley take part in a march against antisemitism.

Gideon Falter, chief executive of Campaign Against Antisemitism, told marchers that since the deadly incursion by Hamas into southern Israel, antisemitic crime “has surged in this country by over 1,000%”.

“Demonstrations marched through our cities, marched through our capital, where people glorify terrorism, where people incite racism against Jews.

“And indeed, as we saw yesterday, yet again, carrying placards showing a Star of David thrown in the bin with a caption that says ‘please keep the world clean’, messaging that would not have been out of place in 1930s Germany, it is appalling.”

Tens of thousands of people gathered on Saturday for the latest demonstration, demanding a permanent ceasefire in Gaza, with some demonstrators accusing Israel of committing genocide and others chanting “from the river to the sea”.

Immigration minister Robert Jenrick speaks at a rally against antisemitism.

There were 18 arrests over the course of the day for a range of alleged offences, including suspicion of inciting racial hatred and suspicion of supporting a proscribed organisation.

Organisers Stop the War coalition said those at the now-regular marches have “clear anti-racist foundations” and oppose both antisemitism and Islamophobia. It had asked anyone attending Saturday’s rally to “respect these clear anti-racist principles, including in any signs or placards they choose to bring to the march”.

Johnson compared antisemitism with “an old spore of a virus”.

“Whatever the rights and wrongs of what Israel has done, or is doing, I think that the antisemitism that we’ve seen in some of these marches around western Europe and further afield has really confirmed for me the absolute necessity, the human necessity, for Israel to exist,” he told GB News.

Seen among the many banners were some that lightened the mood.

Jenrick, who said he was at the march to represent the Government, spoke from the stage to warn that “enough is enough”.

He said antisemitism was a “stain on our country, it is moral decay”.

Security minister Tom Tugendhat was among celebrities including Tracy-Ann Oberman, Rachel Riley and Robert Rinder at the march.

People waved Israeli and Union flags and placards reading “Never Again Is Now” and “Zero Tolerance for Antisemites”.

There had been fears that Robinson, former leader of the English Defence League, could disrupt the protest, with organisers making clear that he would not be welcome.

Police said a 40-year-old man had been arrested close to the Royal Courts of Justice, from where the demonstration began on Sunday.

Robinson had previously been seen among the crowds of counter-protesters who clashed with police during ceasefire protests held on Armistice Day.

In a statement, the Met said the organisers had “been clear about their concerns that the man’s attendance, and that of those who were likely to accompany him, would cause fear for other participants.

“The same view has been voiced by others.

“As a result he was spoken to and warned on more than one occasion that his continued presence in the area was likely to cause harassment, alarm and distress to others.

“He was directed to leave the area but refused to do so.”

It comes as the Israeli military said that 14 Israelis and three foreign nationals have been released from captivity in Gaza, on the third day of a four-day truce.

Among those reunited with their family on Saturday was nine-year-old Irish-Israeli girl Emily Hand, who was among those abducted by the Palestinian terror group during the deadly Hamas attack on 7 October.

Hamas is to release at least 50 Israeli hostages, and Israel 150 Palestinian prisoners. All are women and minors.


 

United against anti-Semitism: Thousands march in London with Boris in attendance and Tommy Robinson arrested

26 November 2023, 18:36 | Updated: 26 November 2023, 19:53

Hundreds of thousands of people marched through central London to demonstrate against anti-Semitism
Hundreds of thousands of people marched through central London to demonstrate against anti-Semitism. Picture: Getty/Alamy

Around 60,000 people have marched through central London to demonstrate against anti-Semitism, with Boris Johnson, Vanessa Feltz and Rachel Riley in attendance.

The 90-minute march started at the Royal Courts of Justice in central London and was the biggest protest against anti-Semitism since 1936.

Speaking at the march, the former prime minister said: "It's very sad that this march has to take place at all. What we're all doing here is showing solidarity with Jewish people, and that is necessary."

He was joined by his wife Carrie and their young baby Baby Frank Alfred Odysseus.

Meanwhile, Jewish actress Maureen Lipman told the Mail: "It's been an amazing turnout. It's great to come and show support. We don't want to be here for why we are here, but we have to be here.

"As the Jewish community, we're in shock. There has been a terrible reckoning, it has frightened all of us."

Boris Johnson at today's march against anti-Semitism
Boris Johnson at today's march against anti-Semitism. Picture: Alamy
Hundreds of thousands of people turned out
Hundreds of thousands of people turned out. Picture: Getty

Tommy Robinson was arrested after being warned against attending by the march's organisers.

The English Defence League founder was escorted away by more than a dozen police officers after arguing with them for around 10 minutes.

There had been fears that Mr Robinson could disrupt the protest - organised by charity Campaign Against Antisemitism - after he was previously seen among the crowds of counter-protesters who clashed with police on Armistice Day.

Police confirmed a 40-year-old man had been arrested close to the Royal Courts of Justice, from where the demonstration began on Sunday afternoon.

In a statement, the Met said: "We have been in frequent contact with the organisers of the march in recent days.

"They have been clear about their concerns that the man's attendance, and that of those who were likely to accompany him, would cause fear for other participants.

"The same view has been voiced by others.

"As a result, he was spoken to and warned on more than one occasion that his continued presence in the area was likely to cause harassment, alarm and distress to others.

"He was directed to leave the area but refused to do so."

Read more: Half of British Jews 'considering leaving the UK' amid 'staggering' rise in anti-Semitism

Read more: BBC staff 'barred from joining march against anti-Semitism' over impartiality rules

At the end of the protest, a second man was arrested for shouting anti-Semitic abuse.

The Met said at 6pm: The March Against Antisemitism has concluded.

"As the crowds left along Whitehall, a man was heard to make antisemitic comments. He was arrested on suspicion of a racially aggravated public order offence.

"In total, there were two arrests during today’s operation."

It came one day after pro-Palestinian crowds also gathered in the capital to demand a ceasefire in Gaza.

A truce between Hamas and Israel is still holding, with the release of a third group of hostages and Palestinians from Israeli prisons coming late on Sunday.

Security minister Tom Tugendhat also joined celebrities including Tracy-Ann Oberman and Robert Rinder at the march.

Tracey-Ann Oberman (left) and Rachel Riley take part in a march against anti-Semitism
Tracey-Ann Oberman (left) and Rachel Riley take part in a march against anti-Semitism. Picture: Alamy

It comes after engagement manager for Campaign Against Antisemitism Binyomin Gilbert told LBC News a survey had found half of British Jews have considered leaving the UK amid a "staggering" rise in discrimination.

Nearly 70 per cent of Jews in the UK have also held back from showing visible signs of being Jewish, findings showed.

It follows a multi-pronged attack by Hamas on Israel on October 7, killing 1,200 people and taking 240 hostage.

There have since been weekly pro-Palestine rallies in London, in which Campaign Against Antisemitism says there have been "genocidal chants, Hamas-style headbands, antisemitic placards and calls for jihad".

"We have seen a 1300% increase in anti-Semitism," Mr Gilbert said.

"And this is staggering. And in fact I can release to you today the results of a survey of British Jews, which has shown us that 69%, nearly 70% of British Jews are saying that they are now less likely to show visible signs of their duties.

"It also shows us that half of British Jews have considered whether they need to leave the UK due to anti-Semitism."

He said "there's a lot of fear and concern" for British Jews at the moment.

Addressing the pro-Palestine marches through the capital, Mr Gilbert said: "What we've seen is large scale marches week after week.

"In fact, there were protests happening before Israel had retaliated in the streets of London.

"And we have seen in those marches, calls for intifada, we've seen support for organisations that want Jews dead."

He went on: "When we have racists turn up at our rallies, we pull them out.

"When we have people turn up in our rallies who want to try and manipulate and politicise anti-Semitism and cast one minority group against another, we have been unequivocal."

He said he is confident there will not be violence but "positive displays of the Jewish community and its allies standing up and saying this is what British values mean".

UK
Telegraph sale: Don’t get ‘sentimental,’ UK minister warns, as Tories fear UAE buy-up

Minister seeks to allay Tory concerns ahead of a major investment summit on Monday.

There are mounting calls for the government to intervene in the proposed acquisition of the 200-year-old Conservative Party staple on press freedom grounds 
| Steve Eason/Hulton Archive/Getty Images

BY STEFAN BOSCIA
NOVEMBER 26, 2023 

LONDON — Britain’s investment minister warned critics of a controversial attempt to sell the Daily Telegraph newspaper to a fund backed by the United Arab Emirates not to get “sentimental about some of our so-called treasured assets.”

Amid mounting calls for the government to intervene in the proposed acquisition of the 200-year-old Conservative Party staple on press freedom grounds, Dominic Johnson told POLITICO the U.K. needs to remain an “open economy.”

And he suggested he would not oppose the sale of a national newspaper to the UAE as long as the proper “judicial processes” are followed.

Lloyds Bank has agreed to a deal involving the effective takeover of the Telegraph and the Spectator — another favorite of grassroots Conservatives — by Redbird IMI, an investment vehicle controlled by Abu Dhabi’s sovereign wealth fund.

The deal has sparked fierce resistance from some Conservative MPs concerned about the right-leaning newspaper’s editorial freedom. They point to the UAE’s poor domestic record on press freedom.

Culture Secretary Lucy Frazer said last week that she was “minded” to intervene in the takeover by launching an official review by two watchdogs, but no final decision has been taken.

Johnson, who will welcome senior figures from the UAE and other Gulf states at Monday’s Global Investment Summit in London, said “the UAE is a first class and extremely well run country” and that he had “always been immensely impressed by the caliber of leadership there.”

“My view is that we remain an open economy and it’s very important we remain an open economy if we’re to have the wealth and investment to power this country,” he said.

“My formula is always to revert to ‘what is going to make this country richer and more prosperous and secure?’”

“We can be quite sentimental about some of our so-called treasured assets,” Johnson added. “The reality is that media and information has moved on and clearly most of us today don’t buy a physical newspaper or necessarily go to a traditional news source.”

Monday’s Global Investment Summit brings together chief executives of some of the largest financial firms on the planet, including J.P. Morgan, Goldman Sachs and Blackstone.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and other ministers will spend the day trying to sell Britain as an investment destination to the private sector, while also trying to close multi-billion-pound investment deals with foreign countries.

“I want to use the investment summit to showcase the U.K. in terms of science and technology leadership, to do deals and use it as a fulcrum point to generate many millions of pounds worth of investment into the U.K. ... and expose all my colleagues to the investment needs of the top 200 business people in the world,” Johnson said.

Academic tortured in UAE calls for delay to sale of The Telegraph



Patrick Sawer
Sun, 26 November 2023 

Matthew Hedges warned The Telegraph could lose its independence - Christopher Pledger for the Telegraph

A British academic jailed and tortured in the United Arab Emirates after being falsely accused of spying has criticised the bid by an Abu Dhabi-led investment fund to buy The Telegraph.

Matthew Hedges, who was sentenced to life in jail in November 2018 after being arrested at Dubai airport, before being eventually released later that month, called for the UK Government to delay the proposed deal.

The RedBird IMI investment fund planning to take ownership of The Telegraph and The Spectator is led by the former CNN chief Jeff Zucker and mostly funded by Abu Dhabi royalty, whose city is the capital of the UAE.


Writing in a letter to this newspaper Mr Hedges said: “It is entirely correct and appropriate that the Government should issue a public interest intervention notice delaying the proposed deal by UAE based RedBird IMI to purchase The Telegraph.”

He added: “As a victim of torture at the hands of the UAE, simply for undertaking legitimate academic research, I personally attest to the UAE’s disregard for human rights. It would be inappropriate to surrender a trusted media outlet to a foreign state who does not themselves respect freedom of speech.”

Mr Hedges said the proposed deal was intended to increase the UAE’s “political leverage and influence” and should be stopped in order to defend British democracy.

“These titles will lose their independence. If you’re funded by a foreign state you don’t want to bite the hand that feeds,” he told BBC Newsnight on Friday.

The academic was falsely accused of spying for MI6 after being arrested at Dubai airport in May 2018, as he tried to leave the UAE.

It took a month following his arrest before Mr Hedges was even granted a meeting with a British consular officer.

During the first month of detention, Mr Hedges, who completed his PhD at Durham University, suffered prolonged interrogation and torture at the hands of the Emirate’s security services, who accused him of spying for the British government.

Earlier this year the Parliamentary Ombudsman recommended that the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) apologise to Mr Hedges for failing to protect him from torture after he was arrested and pay him £1,500 in compensation.

In a statement, the UAE government said: “Mr Hedges received entirely proper care and treatment.

“He had bedding, reading materials, a television, access to family, consular officials and lawyers and extensive medical care. He was never subjected to, or threatened with, either torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment of any sort.”
UK
Two in five female transport workers suffer sexual harassment at work, RMT survey finds


Passengers board a train at Kings Cross station in London


TWO in five female public transport workers have been sexually harassed at work in the last year, an RMT survey has found.

The union surveyed 1,400 women workers across rail, bus, metro and passenger ferry.

It found that 40 per cent of women public transport workers said they had been sexually harassed at work in the last year.

Nearly seven in 10 of those affected did not report the incidents, with the most common reason being that they did not think their complaint would be taken seriously.

More than 80 per cent of women also said that sexual harassment on public transport is becoming more of a problem, with some sharing disturbing testimony of the abuse.

One said: “I have had numerous men stroke my bum as they pass by and that’s in the day.

“Of a night when they are drunk, it’s worse — I’ve had a group of men grab me and say ‘come on love, sit on my knee’.”

Another added that harassment included “cat-calling, touching, staring, unwanted uncomfortable conversation, unwanted ‘compliments’ and people taking pictures of me without my permission.”

A third said: “Sexually aggressive, explicit language as a form of intimidation is a frequent thing.”

A fourth said: “I have had many comments made to me, one which has stuck with was: ‘You look amazing in that uniform, but I think you would look better out of it’.”

RMT general secretary Mick Lynch said: “On the International day for the Eradication of Violence Against Women, this survey shows employers have much more to do in the public transport industry — and the authorities in wider society — to tackle misogyny and harassment against women.

“It is clear that more staffing and reducing lone working will help make our members feel safer.”
Amazon hit by 'Black Friday' strikes in Europe
LONDON



November 26 2023 

Amazon was hit by strikes at various locations in Britain, Germany and Italy during the annual "Black Friday" shopping extravaganza as workers demand higher wages and better working conditions.

Haberin Devamı

More than 1,000 workers went on strike at an Amazon hub in Coventry, England, which employs 2,300 people and supplies other warehouses.

In Germany, the industrial action called by Union Verdi began overnight on Nov. 23, affecting five out of the U.S. e-commerce giant's 20 logistics sites in Europe's biggest economy.

Workers at the Amazon hub in Castel San Giovanni, between Piacenza and Milan, joined the strike.

In Britain, the GMB union said Amazon has refused to talk to the workers.

Workers want their pay to rise from 12 pounds ($15) per hour currently to 15 pounds per hour.

In Germany, Amazon said workers already had a "fair wage and good additional benefits."

Starting wages are at 14 euros ($15.30) and above per hour, the company said, higher than Germany's minimum wage of 12 euros.

In Italy, the union complained about "unacceptable" pay increases as well as a failure by Amazon to raise the amount of meal vouchers and a lack of attention to health issues, among other reasons.

The actions in Italy coincided with a strike called across the whole of northern Italy against Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's budget.

In Spain, one-hour work stoppages are planned for "Cyber Monday" and the following day, according to the CCOO union, which pointed to poor working conditions and "persistent problems" with human resources at the company's Spanish sites.

In France, there were no strikes at any Amazon facilities, according to the company.

Black Friday ,
Russia wages electronic warfare ‘using UK-made tech’, Ukraine dossier claims

Jon Ungoed-Thomas
Sun, 26 November 2023 

Photograph: Global Images Ukraine/Getty Images

Many of the countries that have sanctioned Russia over the war in Ukraine need to take urgent action to disrupt the supply of technology for its electronic warfare campaign, according to a new report.

The dossier compiled by Ukraine and circulated to the major countries which have imposed sanctions identifies key Russian firms involved in the development and production of electronic military equipment. It says the UK and other countries have not yet sanctioned some of the firms involved.

It identified what it claims is technology made by British firms in some of the advanced electronic equipment engaged in the conflict, and says more effective action is required to block the use of foreign components.


The report states: “The effectiveness of Russian electronic systems largely depends on access to imported components that are widely used in the production of such systems ... Specific steps should be taken immediately to reduce the Russian military-industrial complex’s capability.”

Related: Russia launches most intensive drone attack since invasion began, says Ukraine

Senior military commanders in Ukraine are concerned at recent advances by Russia in the electronic warfare battle. In a recent article in the Economist, Valery Zaluzhny, commander-in-chief of Ukraine’s armed forces, wrote: “[Electronic warfare] is the key to victory in the drone war.

“Russia modernised its [electronic warfare] forces over the past decade, creating a new branch of its army and building 60 new types of equipment. It outdoes us in this area: 65% of our jamming platforms at the start of the war were produced in Soviet times.”

The new Ukrainian report says that, in addition to jamming equipment, electronic intelligence systems can detect drone launches and predict possible military action. Specialised radar equipment can be used to track drones.

Eight key Russian firms are involved in the production of electronic warfare, the report says. They include the entities Strela Research and Production Association, Protek Research and Development Enterprise and Radioelectronic Technologies Concern, which it says have not been sanctioned by the UK.

It also names components from British firms which it says have been found in Russian electronic warfare. The companies involved say they have ceased all trading with Russia.

According to the report, transistors from Semelab Ltd, which has its registered office in Woking, Surrey, and is owned by TT Electronic Group Holdings, were found in equipment to block radio-controlled devices and communication on the battlefield. Power supply equipment from XP Power, which has its HQ in Singapore and is listed on the London Stock Exchange, was found in mobile short-range radar. And parts allegedly manufactured by Golledge Electronics, based in Ilminster, Somerset, were found in a direction-finding system.

A spokesperson for TT Electronics said: “Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, TT Electronics has adopted a total prohibition on all sales to any Russian entities. Due to the nature of international supply chains, once a product is sold it may then be sold on many times prior to its end-use. Such onward sales and end-use are not within the manufacturer’s control.

“TT Electronics acts in compliance with all export control laws and regulations and operates a detailed export control compliance programme.” The relevant components cited in the report are not designed for military use.

XP Power said it had a small distributor in Russia which it ceased trading with in 2022. It said the parts identified in the report were manufactured by a partner and supplied before the Ukraine invasion.

The company said: “XP has done no business in Russia since February 2022 and operates in full compliance of the sanctions.”

Golledge Electronics said it stopped all business with its Russian distributor in February 2022. It said it had not supplied any components to the Russian distributor since 2021, and since 2016 every shipment was subject to clearance by the UK government. The firm said it was unlikely the components identified in the report were genuine since the marked code number “does not tally with any Golledge product”.

The report says sanctions should be imposed on the Russian firms identified. It also proposes a “unified database of components” identifying the technology which the Russian military is using in its electronic warfare equipment.

Officials at the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office say they have prohibited the exports and supply to Russia of thousands of products, banning all items found on the battlefield. The UK recently acted to disrupt a covert procurement network used by Russia to acquire critical western technology.
Ecuador's newly sworn-in president repeals guidelines allowing people to carry limited drug amounts

A statement from Noboa’s office announcing the move argued that the old guidelines “encouraged micro-trafficking” and characterized them as a “harmful element for Ecuadorian society.” 
MICRO; TEENY, TINY, LITTLEST, ETC

Associated Press
Sat, November 25, 2023

National Assembly President Henry Kronfle places the presidential sash on President Daniel Noboa after he was sworn-in as the country's new president, during his inauguration ceremony at the National Assembly, in Quito, Ecuador, Thursday, Nov. 23, 2023. (AP Photo/Juan Diego Montenegro) 

QUITO, Ecuador (AP) — Less than 48 hours into his term, Ecuador President Daniel Noboa on Friday repealed controversial guidelines established by the country’s left a decade ago that eliminated penalties for people found carrying illegal drugs under certain amounts.

Noboa’s decision fulfilled a campaign promise to fight drug trafficking. Consequences of the illegal trade, particularly cocaine, have kept Ecuadorians on edge as killings, kidnappings, robberies, extortion and other crimes reached unprecedented levels.

A statement from Noboa’s office announcing the move argued that the old guidelines “encouraged micro-trafficking” and characterized them as a “harmful element for Ecuadorian society.” 

Noboa also directed the ministries of interior and public health to develop “coordinated information, prevention and control programs on the consumption of narcotic and psychotropic substances” and to offer treatment and rehabilitation to “habitual and problematic occasional users.

The guidelines were adopted in 2013 during the presidency of Rafael Correa under the argument that illegal drug use was a public health problem and users should not be sent to prison. The quantities used in the guidelines attempted to differentiate drug consumption from drug trafficking.

Under the parameters, an individual could carry for personal use up to 10 grams of marijuana, 2 grams of cocaine paste, 1 gram of cocaine, 0.10 grams of heroin and 0.04 grams of amphetamine.

The guidelines were highly criticized from the start by Ecuador’s right, and in general, the country’s conservative society.

It remained unclear how Noboa’s decision will be implemented. His predecessor, President Guillermo Lasso, announced in January 2021 his own decision to eliminate the parameters, arguing that they affected “young people and children,” but it was never implemented.

In addition, a ruling from Ecuador’s Constitutional Court orders judges to distinguish between consumers and traffickers when determining possible punishments. Without the guidelines, however, it is unclear how they will make the distinction.

Noboa was sworn in to office Thursday after defeating Luisa Gonzalez, a Correa mentee, in a runoff election Oct. 15. His term will run only through May 2025, which is what remained of Lasso’s tenure. Lasso cut his term short when he dissolved the National Assembly in May as lawmakers pursued impeachment proceedings against him.

Under Lasso’s watch, violent deaths in Ecuador soared, reaching a record 4,600 in 2022, which was double the number from the year before.

The spike in violence is tied to the trafficking of cocaine produced in neighboring Colombia and Peru. Mexican, Colombian and Balkan cartels have set down roots in Ecuador and operate with assistance from local criminal gangs.
Neuralink, Elon Musk's brain implant startup, quietly raises an additional $43M

Kyle Wiggers
Sat, November 25, 2023 

Image Credits: Nathan Laine / Bloomberg

Neuralink, the Elon Musk-founded company developing implantable chips that can read brain waves, has raised an additional $43 million in venture capital, according to a filing with the SEC.

The filing published this week shows the company increased its previous tranche, led by Peter Thiel's Founders Fund, from $280 million to $323 million in early August. Thirty-two investors participated, according to the filing.

Neuralink hasn't disclosed its valuation recently. But in June, Reuters reported that the company was valued at about $5 billion after privately-executed stock trades.

Founded in 2016, Neuralink has devised a sewing machine-like device capable of implanting ultra-thin threads inside the brain. The threads attach to a custom-designed chip containing electrodes that can read information from groups of neurons.

Brain-signal-reading implants are a decades-old technology. But Neuralink's ostensible innovation lies in making the implants wireless and increasing the number of implanted electrodes.

In May, Neuralink received FDA approval for human clinical trials after having its application previously rejected, and opened up its first human trials for recruitment under an investigational device exemption by the FDA.

But Neuralink is under increasing scrutiny for what critics allege are a toxic workplace culture -- and unethical research practices.

In a January 2022 article in Fortune, anonymous former employees described a "culture of blame and fear" -- one in which Musk would frequently undermine management by encouraging junior employees "to email issues and complaints to him directly." By August 2020, only three of the eight founding scientists remained at the company, the result of what a Stat News piece described as "internal conflict in which rushed timelines ... clashed with the slow and incremental pace of science."

In 2022, the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) alleged that Neuralink and UC Davis, once its research partner, had mistreated several monkeys involved with testing Neuralink hardware -- subjecting them to psychological distress and chronic infections due to surgeries. Reports from both Reuters and Wired suggested testing was being rushed due to Musk's demands for fast results, which led to complications with the installation of electrodes -- including partial paralysis and brain swelling.

For nearly a year, Neuralink was under federal investigation by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) regarding animal welfare violations. The USDA eventually concluded that there was "no evidence" of animal welfare breaches in the startup's trials other than a previous, self-reported incident from 2019 -- but the PCRM disputed the results of the investigation.

in November 2023, U.S. Lawmakers ask to SEC to investigated Neuralink for omitting details about the deaths of at least a dozen animals who were surgically fitted with its implants.
Tesla ‘faces ban’ on selling self-driving cars in Britain


James Titcomb
Sun, 26 November 2023 

Tesla driverless cars UK

Tesla faces a ban on selling its full self-driving technology in Britain under new driverless car laws, in a setback to Elon Musk’s plans for millions of robot-driven vehicles.

The Department for Transport will prevent carmakers from describing vehicles as “self-driving” or “driverless” unless their systems are approved under changes coming as soon as next year.

Blocking the technology’s sale in Britain would be the latest blow for Mr Musk’s Tesla, which has faced multiple lawsuits and investigations over the safety of its driver assistance technology.

Tesla has for years charged motorists around the world thousands of pounds for an optional “full self-driving” upgrade, but has only activated a test version of the technology in North America.

Despite its name, the feature requires constant monitoring from drivers and is described as an “assistance” system, meaning that it would be unlikely to meet the high bar for government approval under its upcoming Automated Vehicles Bill.

Last week, government notes on how it plans to enforce the bill said the terms “self-drive”, “self-driving”, “drive itself”, “driverless” and “automated vehicle” would be regulated under efforts to prevent the “misleading marketing” of the technology.

It said restrictions on how carmakers can market their systems will be the first part of the new regime to come into effect, and will start being enforced in 2024 or 2025, soon after the Automated Vehicles Bill is signed into law.

Tesla’s less-advanced Autopilot system, which allows cars to maintain their speed in traffic, follow roads, and change lanes, would not be covered under the marketing rules.

Legal experts said the proposals mean Tesla would face difficulties in continuing to market the technology in the UK under government plans to more closely regulate driverless vehicles.

Tesla’s $742bn (£589bn) valuation, making it the world’s most valuable carmaker, has been partly predicated on Mr Musk’s long-running promises that its cars will not require human intervention.

“It’s really the difference between Tesla being worth a lot of money or worth basically zero,” he said earlier this year.

Tesla has sold cars with “Full Self-Driving Capability” since 2016, and charges £6,800 to drivers in the UK. It says the feature may not be activated until it is approved by regulators.

Brian Wong, a specialist transport lawyer at Burges Salmon, said: “Terms like ‘full self-driving’ would be problematic if vehicles have not been approved as automated vehicles so Tesla and, indeed other [manufacturers], would need to take heed.

“This is one of the biggest concerns shared by all, including those in the industry, about automated vehicles: public confusion about the functionality of vehicles that are not approved as automated.”

Tesla has been hiring test drivers in the UK and Europe to trial its more sophisticated self-driving systems, in what has been seen as a sign that the company is preparing to launch the technology overseas.

Recommended
I put my life in the hands of a driverless car on San Francisco’s anarchic streets
Read more

Thousands of Tesla owners in the US and Canada have been offered access to a “beta” version of the technology since 2020, but Mr Musk has faced setbacks in introducing it in other countries.

“In the US, things are legal by default,” he said last year. “In Europe, they’re illegal by default. So, we have to get approval beforehand. Whereas, in the US, you can kind of do it on your own cognizance, more or less.”

Mr Musk has repeatedly made ambitious pledges about driverless car technology, promising that a Tesla would be able to drive across the US without human intervention as early as 2017.

“Obviously, in the past, I’ve been overly optimistic about this,” he told investors last month.

Tesla has faced a string of investigations from government agencies in the US over Autopilot and Full Self-Driving. Last month it won the first US trial over allegations that its Autopilot system had led to a death on the road.

Tesla did not respond to a request for comment.

A Department for Transport spokesman said: “Safety is at the heart of our AV Bill, which is why we’re introducing new regulations to prohibit misleading marketing practices, as recommended by the Law Commission. This will help protect consumers and the public by ensuring only vehicles that meet rigorous standards can be marketed as such.”
GROOMING CONSUMERS
Unsealed complaint says Meta 'coveted' under-13s and deceives the public about age enforcement

The unredacted document reveals more details from a lawsuit filed against Meta by 33 states in October.


Cheyenne MacDonald
·Weekend Editor
Sat, November 25, 2023 

Francis Mascarenhas / reuters


An unsealed complaint in a lawsuit filed against Meta by 33 states alleges the company is not only aware that children under the age of 13 use its platforms, but has also “coveted and pursued” this demographic for years on Instagram. The document, which was first spotted by The New York Times, claims that Meta has long been dishonest about how it handles underage users’ accounts when they’re discovered, often failing to disable them when reported and continuing to harvest their data.

The newly unsealed complaint, filed on Wednesday, reveals arguments that were previously redacted when attorneys generals from across the US first hit Meta with the lawsuit last month in the California federal court. It alleges the presence of under-13s is an “open secret” at Meta. While the policies on Facebook and Instagram state a person must be at least 13 years old to sign up, children can easily lie about their age — something the lawsuit says Meta is well aware of, and has done little to stop. Instead, when Meta “received over 1.1 million reports of under-13 users on Instagram” from 2019-2023, it “disabled only a fraction of those accounts and routinely continued to collect children’s data without parental consent,” the complaint says.

Meta “routinely violates” the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (COPPA) by targeting children and collecting their information without parental consent, according to the complaint. The lawsuit also argues that Meta’s platforms manipulate young users into spending unhealthy amounts of time on the apps, promote body dysmorphia and expose them to potentially harmful content. When the lawsuit was first filed in October, a Meta spokesperson said the company was “disappointed” over the chosen course of action, stating, “We share the attorneys general’s commitment to providing teens with safe, positive experiences online.”

Meta earlier this month published a blog post calling for federal legislation to put more responsibility on parents when it comes to kids’ app downloads. Meta's global head of safety, Antigone Davis, proposed a requirement for parents to have approval power over downloads for kids under the age of 16.

SUNDAY SERMON
Watch This Texas Democrat Leave Republicans Speechless When He Uses The Bible Against Them

Ariel Messman-Rucker
Fri, November 24, 2023 

(L) James Talarico holding a 'Don't mess with Texas Public Schools' sign, (R) James Talarico


A video of Texas State Rep. James Talarico using biblical scripture to tear down conservative Christian arguments is going viral on social media, and it is glorious to watch.

This past summer, Texas Republicans tried to pass Senate Bill 1515, which would have required the Ten Commandments to be displayed prominently in every public school classroom in the state. The bill was an attempt by conservative Christian Republicans to inject religion into schools, but Talarico wasn’t going to take this lying down. Instead, he used their religious text against them.

After passing the Texas State Senate, the House Public Education Committee was considering the bill at a May meeting, where Republican Candy Nobel — who sponsored the bill — argued that “This legislation will bring back this historic tradition of recognizing America’s foundational heritage in both our education and our judicial system,” reported the Texas Scorecard.

In a viral video of the meeting posted to his TikTok account, Talarico stood up for LGBTQ+ rights and calmly explained why, as a Christian, he feels the “bill is not only unconstitutional, it’s not only un-American, I think it is also deeply un-Christian.”

After quoting from the Bible, the Democratic lawmaker said, “A religion that has to force people to put up a poster to prove its legitimacy is a dead religion, and it’s not one I want to be a part of. It’s not one I am a part of.”

Talarico then brings up that this bill seems to go against Republicans’ desire to get parental consent for everything. “Every time on this committee that we try to teach students values like empathy or kindness, we’re told we can’t because that’s the parent’s role,” he said. “Every time on this committee that we try to teach basic sex education to keep our kids safe, we’re told that’s the parent’s role, but now you’re putting religious commandments — literal commandments — in our classroom, and you’re saying that’s the state’s role. Why is that not the parent’s role?”

This question left Nobel silent and searching for words before finally saying, “That’s really an interesting rabbit trail that you’ve gone on with that.”

Later, Talarico asks Nobel, “Do you believe schools are for education and not indoctrination?” to which Nobel answers, “Absolutely.” Then Talarico brings his arguments home, saying, “I guess what I’m trying to figure out is why is having a rainbow in a classroom is indoctrination and not having the Ten Commandments in a classroom.”

The stunning video already has 5.8 million views and 1 million likes on TikTok and is now gaining traction on Threads. But this isn’t the only time the Austin representative has stood up for the rights of Texas students; he’s also fought against unfair school voucher programs, book bans, and even for having Narcan available in schools.

Although it's unclear whether or not Talarico's arguments were a factor in the outcome of the legislation, the time for Ten Commandments legislation expired before the bill could receive a vote and won't be instituted in Texas public schools, the New York Times reported.

Conservative Christians continue their quest to shove their religious beliefs down everyone’s throat, but with lawmakers like Talarico out there, we may have a chance of keeping them out of our schools.