Tuesday, January 09, 2024

Capitalism’s Deepening Crisis and the Coming Fightback


 
 JANUARY 5, 2024
Facebook

Photograph by Nathaniel St. Clair

We are horrified to daily witness the monstrous deeds of a crisis-ridden world capitalism that knows no way out other than by inflicting new waves of catastrophe on the world’s people. Today’s US-backed and orchestrated Zionist genocide of the Palestinian people is but one more glaring example. But a broader assessment is essential.

President Biden repeatedly sends to Tel Aviv his top imperial agents of doom – Secretary of “Defense” Lloyd Austin, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, General CQ Brown Jr., chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and National Security Council adviser, Jake Sullivan. They take turns in photo ops advising Israel’s neo-fascist Zionist murderer, Benjamin Natanyahu, on how to prettify his army’s ever-intensifying genocide in Gaza.

Before the corrupt corporate media, whose twisted accounts are routinely overseen by CIA censors or imbedded US government agents, they counsel the butcher Natanyahu to demonstrate a modicum of “restraint” while instantly replaces every 2,000 pound bunker-buster bomb and all other advanced weaponries Israel deploys to pulverize defenseless people.

Sullivan claimed last week that Israel would be “transitioning to another phase of the war focused on more precise ways of targeting the leadership of Hamas.” Netanyahu instantly denied Sullivan’s assertion, emphatically repeating Israel’s position that all Palestinians are in the daily crosshairs of the Zionist killing machine, literally among the most powerful in the world.

That two-thirds of Gaza has already been obliterated/leveled and three quarters of its 2.3 million inhabitants made homeless does not factor into US empty calls for “restraint.” Neither does the fact that 70 percent of the Palestinian dead are women and children.

The genocide continues uninterrupted. 20,000+ innocent Palestinians have been slaughtered to date. Multiple thousands more are buried beneath the rubble of a carpet-bombed obliterated Gaza. 72,000 more are wounded. The great majority is starving. Infectious disease is rampant.

Yet, the US bans all measures of relief as the world’s working masses observe in horror and contempt the US-promoted genocide. A new generation of radicalizing youth is on the march across the country and worldwide. The vast majority of humanity condemns the Zionist regime. Unprecedented mass mobilizations are the norm around the world.

History of Zionist mass murder outside Palestine

Israel is no newcomer to genocidal warfare. When a mass US antiwar movement forced the Jimmy Carter administration in 1978 to bar all Defense Department sales of military equipment to Guatemala, Israel was there to fill the gap, providing the death squad regime of Rios Montt with Israel’s state-of-the-art automatic rifles to secretly continue the US-backed genocide.

400,000 indigenous Mayan Guatemalans were murdered. One million more were forced to flee for their lives. (See: “Israel and Genocide: Not Only In Gaza,” Mark Lewis Taylor, CounterPunch, Dec.  22, 2023.)

A few years later, under the Reagan administration, following Congress’s Boland Amendment to a finance bill banning US aid to the Honduras-based Nicaraguan Contras and to El Salvador’s death squad regime, Zionist Israel was again called on to do US imperialism’s dirty deeds. This time out they surreptitiously provided funds, along with the Saudi monarchy, to buy crack cocaine from the Colombian MedellĂ­n Cartel, wherein the CIA’s National Security adviser Oliver North smuggled it into Los Angeles’s Black community and other US cities. The profits collected by North and his CIA agents were sent to the Nicaraguan Contras in the infamous “Contragate Affair.” [See “CIA, Crack in America,” By Jeff Mackler, Socialist Action Books, 1986].

US vetoes UN ceasefire resolution

Biden’s words of “restraint” notwithstanding, his US representative to the now, for all critical purposes, defunct United Nations, cast the sole Security Council VETO blocking a UN call for a Ceasefire.

And even if a Ceasefire resolution had passed, who would enforce it? Would the world’s military superpower and Israel’s near total military and financial benefactor, turn on a dime and deploy its forces against its Zionist Middle East gendarme killer ally? Would the US withdraw its fleet of aircraft carriers aimed at delivering more weapons to Israel and blocking humanitarian aid to Palestine?

A toothless “ceasefire” resolution was approved by the UN General Assembly with 153 in favor, 10 against and 23 abstaining. Widespread applause was reported to have engulfed the General Assembly Hall. Those voting against were the US, Israel, Austria, Czechia [formerly Czech Republic], Guatemala, Liberia, Micronesia, Nauru, Papua New Guinea and Paraguay.

The United Kingdom, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Argentina, Malawi, the Netherlands, Ukraine, South Sudan, and Uruguay abstained. But the UN General Assembly’s sound and fury came to nothing. The US imperialist beast and its Middle East military enforcer prevailed. The horror continues.

US passes largest military bill in history

The US Congress soon after passed the largest military appropriations bill in history. At $886 billion, “official” US annual military expenditure – three percent more than the previous year – the figure does NOT include hundreds of $billions more for the CIA and related military expenditures. A total of $1.4 trillion is spent annually on the US imperial war machine, or better, for the largely-monopolized military-industrial complex that registers corporate profit rates in the high heavens and rains death and destruction on the world’s people. The maxim, “war is good for profits,” has always been Congress’s guiding principle.

The $886 billion was approved by the House of Representatives by a vote 310 to 118, with 73 Republicans and 45 Democrats opposed. It passed the Senate a day earlier by a vote 87-13. Today, the US spends more on the military than the rest of the world combined! With 1100 US military bases in 110 countries US imperialism is truly “The Cop of the World,” the self-appointed gendarme/defender of the “national security interests” of the US ruling class.  Senate majority leader, Chuck Schumer, left no doubt, stating that the bill would assure that, “America’s military remains state-of-the-art at all times all around the world.”

A product of the usual back room deals, the bill, in the name of “fighting terrorism,” continues various programs that allow US intelligence agencies to secretly spy on the entire world’s population, civil liberties be damned!

The failure of COP28/Dubai

After nearly three decades of UN-sponsored deliberations over the oncoming and ever-accelerating climate crises, this year’s COP28 (UN Framework Convention on Climate Change), Nov. 30. – Dec. 13, once against registered zero progress, indeed a regression.

The Dubai, United Arab Emirates-based COP28 was chaired by UAE politician Sultan Ahmed Al-Jaber, who also heads the UAE’s National Oil Company (ADNOC). Al Jaber is also the UAE’s special envoy for climate change. Prior to the conference he made clear his orientation when he publicly debunked as “fake science” the base findings of the world scientific community that absent a massive and immediate coordinated worldwide effort to eliminate all fossil fuel use in the next few decades, only catastrophic and irreversible consequences will result.

Replete with literally thousands of top representatives of the world’s fossil fuel corporations, the conference once against failed to announce a single binding resolution limiting fossil fuel production!

Indeed, the facts demonstrate that every leading fossil fuel producer in the world, headed by the US and China, has significantly increased fossil fuel drilling and production!

The final COP28 text vaguely called for “winding down” and transiting away” from deadly fossil fuels.

In 2023, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, our planet recorded its warmest November ever with 2023 on track to be the hottest on record.

COP25‘s Paris goal to stay below an increase of 1.5°C warming over pre-industrial levels – the worldwide temperature increase over which only deepening and irreversible climate catastrophe will inevitably result – has been essentially abandoned. With zero concrete implementation measures, the conference, as with all UN climate deliberations, left the field once again wide open to the world’s corporate elite to pursue profits above all else, the world’s people, as with imperialist war, be damned.

And, again, the world’s poorest nations are the hardest hit, with small island nations sinking, if not disappearing into ever-rising seas and devastated by murderous hurricanes, while imperialist-dominated continents in the “Global South” are subjected to capitalist-induced killer heat waves, deforestation, desertification, and massive pollution of vital water supplies.

Demise of COP

The COP process today has devolved into an annual stocktaking exercise, at best a review of what all nations contemplate they might do to mitigate climate catastrophe. In fact, “Global Stocktake” is the official name of COP’s final empty declaration. With the adoption of the 2018 Paris Agreement – which abandoned the 1997 Kyoto Protocol and its so-called binding emission targets and timetables – the battle for any legally binding agreement on the international level has been tragically abandoned.

Once again, capitalism’s inherent contradictions are fully operative.  Ever-intensifying economic competition, over time, invariably reduces average profit rates, compelling all the leading players to resort to endless horrific measures to survive. All these measures are focused on making working people pay.

While the European Union is said to have legally binding emission “targets,” the U.S. has none and indeed is the world’s number one polluter, not to mention the climate horrors it imposes on its virtual neo-colonies and poor nations the world over.

US imperialism knows no limits

Venezuela, Iran, Russia and Syria are apt examples. While all are daily demonized by the corporate media, there is a deadly logic to US policy. Fossil fuel exploitation and war are at its center. Today, US troops occupy almost one-third of Syria, the portion that includes Syria’s rich fossil fuels and agricultural reserves. The same with Iraq. Following the 2003 US war and invasion/conquest, US diplomat Paul Bremmer was appointed Iraq’s de facto head of state and leader of the US-imposed Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA).

That President Biden later stated that the Iraq war was a “mistake” and that its central thesis – that Iraq President Saddam Hussein was preparing to use “weapons of mass destruction” against the US – turned out to be a blatant lie – made no difference to the outcome. Iraq’s massive fossil fuel reserves were essentially turned over to US corporations. I would add only that two million Iraqis were killed in the intense saturation bombing and economic sanctions employed against that country. At that time, the terror bombing was the most intense since WWII. One wary British politician, commenting on the fact that Bremmer took over some UK-owned Iraqi fossil fuel reserves stated, “I too am for world peace, but not for a Pax Americana.”

The US-orchestrated Ukraine coup had as a central imperialist objective replacing Russia’s relatively cheap massive fossil fuel deliveries to Europe via its Nord Stream pipeline – obliterated by CIA operatives – with US-expensive fracked liquid natural gas, a multi-trillion dollar fossil fuel war in disguise. We must add that fracking’s chief bi-product is the deadly methane gas (CH₄), whose greenhouse gas heat-trapping capacity is 120 times greater, moment to moment, than carbon dioxide (CO2). The imperialist designation of natural gas as a “clean fuel” is an oxymoron if there ever was one.

US denunciations of Venezuela and Iran as “dictatorships,” similarly mask the indisputable fact that these nations’ fossil fuel reserves today rank first and second in the world. When revolutionary developments in these nations deposed the previous US-backed dictatorships and moved to end those nations’ subordination to US oil corporations, US imperialism instantly moved to a warlike footing.

In Iran, following the 1979 Iranian Revolution that removed the 1954 US-installed Shah Reza Pahlavi dictatorship, the US orchestrated and financed the eight-year Iran-Iraq War, 1980-1988, aimed at keeping both nations’ massive fossil fuel resources off world markets, not to mention taking the lives of one million Iranians and 800,000 Iraqis! US imperialism “supported both sides of that war!

Heading toward irreversible climate disaster

The most recent UN assessment published in November 2023 sees “no credible pathway” to keep global warming below an 1.5°C increase unless drastic measures are taken to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by 43 percent by 2030 and by 60 percent by 2035, compared with 2019 levels. Reaching the UN’s net zero CO2 emissions target by 2050 is similarly a pipedream. Not a single COP28 proposal moved one inch toward any of these deadlines, portending catastrophe for the world’s people, if not all life on the planet!

To make matters worse, if that’s possible, COP28 concluded with a photo [above] of representatives of 22 nations posing under a banner with the pledge to triple producing energy via nuclear power, a doomsday promise guaranteed to further poison the earth and its ecosystems with deadly nuclear waste ever seeping into the world’s lakes, streams, rivers and oceans, not to mention repeats of the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi power plant disaster in Japan.

Twelve years after Fukushima’s triple reactor meltdown, Japan this year, for the first time, released unprecedented and massive amounts of “treated” radioactive wastewater into the ocean. And dealing with Fukushima’s wastewater is considered qualitatively less difficult than decommissioning the plant itself.  That process has barely begun; the removal of Fukushima’s melted nuclear fuel, still requiring massive amounts of cooling seawater to be pumped daily into the destroyed reactor structures, hasn’t even started! And we are informed at COP28 that nuclear power production will be tripled!

If nothing else COP28 will be marked by that single concluding pledge from the world’s elite ruling rich.

Immigration crisis deepens

Capitalism’s endless wars, its wanton environmental destruction, its economic rape of poor nations, its privatization of the lands of the poor, its punishing economic sanctions imposed on 55 nations, and its endless substitution of high technology manufacturing for human labor, have combined to create a worldwide immigration crisis, wherein the world’s poor are increasingly driven from their homelands in search of a better life elsewhere.

And when they arrive, if they are not instantly deported to the growing refugee camps around the world, they are systematically shunted into their new nation’s lowest wage level jobs and living conditions. They are subjected to corporate media sponsored racist tirades aimed at characterizing them as stealing jobs and otherwise being responsible for all the ills of failing capitalist societies.

Indeed, the ruling elite everywhere consciously use the plight of immigrants to fuel support for overtly racist and increasingly neo-fascist policies and parties, blaming capitalism’s most oppressed victims for the ever-deepening assaults that a crisis-ridden capitalist system imposes on the broad working class.

Rising unemployment and social cutbacks

The “official” US government unemployment rate is 3.9 percent, a figure that has zero correspondence to reality.

The figure includes insufficient part-time work and poorly paid jobs. Adding those who are working less than 35 hours a week, but want more, or who make less than $20,000 annually, boosts the government’s  “functional unemployment rate” to almost 23 percent, according to the Ludwig Institute for Shared Prosperity (LISEP).

Working people understand full well that the “low” unemployment rates touted by the twin parties of US capitalism bear no relationship to the truth. Many work two or three low wage, zero benefit part time jobs in the “gig” economy as so-called independent contractors, that is, for corporations that have fewer and often no obligation to provide benefits. Workers are increasingly hard pressed to pay daily-inflated food prices and ever-escalating rents and fuel costs.

Stock market reaches all-time high

Needless to say the US ruling class measure of success is not the well-being of its “subjects” but rather its bottom line, that is, its profits. When profits are threatened in the face of ever-rising national and international competition, as is the case today, all matters of hell are let loose. From endless wage, healthcare, pension, and other social benefit cuts to speed up, layoffs, part-time/zero benefit work, substitution of machines/computers/robots and now AI (Artificial Intelligence) for workers, offshoring jobs to low wage countries, use of near slave wage prison and low wage immigrant labor, increasing taxes on working people, to endless wars and environmental destruction, nothing is excluded.

More recently, the ruling elite have found some new ways to bolster flagging balance sheets, including rigging the stock market via insider-trading schemes, turning it into a casino-like venture, where the house always wins, or reducing government interest rates charged to large corporations, which in turn “invest” this “free” money into instant stock market and other speculative ventures, for record profits.

Such is today’s prime explanation for the US market’s dramatic rise to all-time highs. When the Federal Reserve chair a few weeks ago announced the likelihood of three corporate interest rate loan reductions in the months ahead, the stock market profit spigot was turned wide open. Nothing can be excluded when the multi-billionaire few set out to game the system.

The system’s base corruption

Whether it be momentary flights to “cryptocurrency” speculation to everyday rigging the tax codes to escape taxation outright [Among President Biden’s 2020 campaign pledges was one to guarantee that the rich, “who don’t pay taxes,” according to Biden, “pay up.”] or simply offshoring profits, as with Apple Computer’s English Channel Island of Jersey [See NYT, Nov. 7, 2017, “Apple has accumulated more than $128 billion in profits offshore, and probably much more, that is untaxed by the United States and hardly touched by any other country. Nearly all of that was made over the past decade.] or establishing corporate headquarters in foreign countries, a la Sam Bankman-Fried’s Nassau, Bahamas FTX, nothing is overlooked by the very people who the super rich assign to write the “laws” that guarantee corporate profits.

All of the above are daily orchestrated by the elite, who fund and control the basic levers of power via their twin capitalist parties and their rigged electoral system. Their corporate-dominated mass media operate to create a “Truman Show” or “Potemkin Village” fake world based on the manufactured illusion of common acceptance of the status quo, ever embedded with racist, sexist, homophobic and anti-immigrant scapegoating.

Nothing is sacred for this elite, including their touted “democracy” replete with billionaire-orchestrated periodic “elections” where their ever-malleable petty-millionaire candidates are “elected” to pretend to run the government. Even capitalism’s touted heads of state Presidents, whether a Biden or Trump or Obama, Clinton or Bush, etc., fully understand their limits, albeit the “moron” egomaniac Trump, as he was described by former Secretary of State and Exxon Mobile chief, Rex Tillerson, momentarily believed that he actually ran the country and could game it at will.

Today’s Joseph Biden is nothing more than the ruling class choice of a hack politician with a half-century service to the ruling rich, including his role in “keeping peace” a half century ago between the Democratic Party’s then overtly racist segregationist Southern wing and its “Northern capitalist liberals.”

Indeed, the ruling rich pulled out all the stops soon after the 2020 primary election season began, near instantly withdrawing support to all the multiple contending candidates and uniting big capital behind Biden’s lagging candidacy.

This included quashing any notion of a “reform” wing in the Democratic Party via the Bernie Sanders candidacy and limiting Republican Trump’s neo-fascist demagogic appeals. They judged that there was no need or room for any serious concessions in economic or social policy with regard to the deepening degradation of the quality of working class life. This was to be continued and intensified, as with Biden’s tax breaks for the rich, his reneging on promises to unions to ease collective bargaining union recognition restrictions, his dramatic expansion in granting offshore drilling permits, imposition of new and brutal anti-immigration measures and his promoting increased funding for killer police departments.

Biden’s response to the Bernie Sanders $16 trillion Green New Deal global warming abatement legislation was a paltry $1.3 trillion omnibus bill, most of which went to “infrastructure” improvement projects largely benefitting the corporate elite. But, the ruling rich also saw no need to echo Trump’s too overtly reactionary language and touted anti-social measures, including his racist and sexist rants against “woke” politics. Biden and his slick team saw no need for book-burning or firing educators for teaching about the Civil War and slavery, or banning abortion as murder, at least for now! But neither Biden nor his Democrats ever legislated the right to abortion into federal law, or abolished the reactionary anti-abortion Hyde Amendment, when the Democrats controlled both house of Congress and the presidency.

The ruling class backs Biden’s candidacy

With the aid of their tightly-controlled and ever-monopolized corporate media, the real US ruling class, perhaps the one-hundredth, if not one-thousandth of one percent of the population, turned their attention to corralling capitalism’s compliant allies among the “Black mis-leadership class” – a term so aptly coined by Black Agenda Report’s former and deceased editor, Glen Ford – into the Democratic Party. They did the same with the largely corrupt AFL-CIO labor bureaucracy and with a compliant Bernie Sanders, and with the largely fractured and demoralized reformist “left” and its largely Democratic Party-associated Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), and with the largely corporate-funded NGOs of the environmental movement. Their prime objective was to place the reliable ruling class stalwart, Joe Biden in the presidency. Once again, the ruling rich employed their “lesser evil” charade to the hilt and Trump was their perfect foil.

Three years later, as we have amply demonstrated, capitalism’s inherent crises show no sign of abatement. Biden has maintained Trump’s tariffs on competitive foreign imports. He imposed new sanctions aimed at nations that don’t comply with US demands. US military interventions have reached new heights. Biden’s congressionally-required annual report listing every country with ongoing US military operations revealed that the US military was operating in 139 nations!

Inter-imperialist rivalry, especially between US and China for new markets and control of the old, has intensified. Zionist Israel’s genocide in Gaza has undermined US imperialism as never before. [See: China’s Imperialism Abroad: “The Belt and Road Initiative” September, 2023 at socialistaction.org,]

Today’s youth radicalization

A broad youth radicalization in unfolding today, influenced by deep anti-racist sentiments of solidarity with the oppressed in the US and worldwide, and especially with the beleaguered masses in Palestine. Originally expressed in the unprecedented Black Lives Matter (BLM) mobilizations of a few years ago, today it has taken giant leaps forward with the almost daily youth-led and often massive and increasingly coodinated protests against US complicity with the ongoing genocide in Gaza. But unlike the BLM protests, that at one point saw five million in the streets protesting racist police murders of unarmed Blacks and exposing US capitalism’s systemic racism, today’s mobilizations, with a new and independent and ever broadening leadership, are unlikely to be coopted into capitalist politics and the Democratic Party, as was the case with the almost instant demise of the BLM movement.

The roots of this new radicalization were evident a few years before BLM, when repeated Pew Polls showed that the majority of youth today preferred socialism to capitalism, a reflection of the fact that today’s youth see their future prospects as significantly dimmer than their parents in capitalist America . In contrast, they see socialism, however it’s defined, as a fundamentally more democratic, humane, anti-authoritarian society aimed at social equality and at advancing human rights in all their manifestations.

Capitalism’s past cooptation response to any youth radicalization has been via its Democratic Party political appendages like the DSA or through the myriad of corporate-financed NGOs, including the Ford Foundation that largely financed the key organizations of the loosely-organized and near leaderless Black Lives Matter movement.

A new youth radicalization unlikely to be stifled [Photo above: mass largely youth mobilization in Washington,D.C.]

A similar cooptation of today’s inspiring youth militancy is unlikely, especially when capitalism’s first cards played aimed at stifling the current and growing passionate youth rebellion against US imperialism’s chief Middle East ally with not only threats of repression but with outright persecution and punishment. This now includes suspensions and expulsions from colleges and universities, threats to ban protesting students from future industry employment, mass arrests of protestors and more.

The government-legislated witchhunt begins

Today’s new witchhunt also includes efforts to force the resignation or pressure administrations to fire prestigious college presidents. Such efforts have already been undertaken at Harvard, MIT, Rutgers and the University of Pennsylvania, to name few. The recent congressional hearings on this issue saw well-known university presidents, including Harvard’s Dr. Claudine Gay – prepared with a statement drafted in collaboration with prestigious attorneys – defending the basic free speech rights of students and the university itself. But Gay, bending to the government’s spurious accusation that anti-Zionism was anti-Semitism, not to mention that advocacy of anti-Zionism was akin to advocacy of genocide, later publicly apologized for some of the language in her statement even though her defense of free speech was fully in accord with all current free speech interpretations of the US Constitution.

On December 13, the House of Representatives approved a bipartisan resolution calling for Gay’s resignation.  Her forced semi-apology notwithstanding, 700 Harvard faculty members defended her remaining president and her defense of free speech. Harvard’s board unanimously affirmed her presidency, despite massive threats from major donors to withdraw their financial support. The reactionary House resolution was effectively deemed dead on arrival, but not before once again revealing the Democratic Party witchhunt complicity.

But University of Pennsylvania President Elizabeth Magill, who also testified before congress along with Gay – under pressure from her own governing board – did resign. Both Gay and Magill refused to directly answer NY Republican congresswomen Elise Stefanik hypothetical question as to whether a student’s advocacy of genocide of Jews violated their universitys’ policies on bullying and harassment. Neither Stefanik nor any other congressional inquisitor charged that any student had advocated genocide of Jews. But for today’s witchhunters opposition to racist, colonial, settler Israeli Zionism is considered advocacy of genocide and must be a punishable offense!

Legislation equates anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism

The congressional attacks on a handful of university presidents have not ended the matter. They have been accompanied by reactionary state and national legislation equating anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism. A December 5, bi-partisan House bill (H.R. 894) explicitly designated anti-Zionism as anti-Semitism. The vote was 311-14 with 92 members voting “Present.” All but one Republican voted in favor. Nearly half of the Democrats followed suit. Most of the rest’s “Present” vote, indicating their “declining to take a position,” were Democrats, yet another deadly affirmation that the Democratic Party has never been and never will be a bulwark against reaction.

Another bill (H.R. 6578) introduced last week aimed at establishing the “Commission to Study Acts of Anti-Semitism in the United States,” perhaps a modern-day version of the McCarthy-era, House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC). The proposed bill authorizes the Commission to hold HUAC witchhunt- type hearings with the power to subpoena, and therefore, intimidate witnesses, including perhaps threats of imprisonment levied against those subpoenaed who refuse, “to name names” of their political collaborators. Yesteryear’s “Are you now or have you ever been member of the Communist Party?” may well be converted today to, “Are you now or have you ever been an anti-Zionist?”

America’s mini-experiment with fascism

US capitalism’s 1950s and 60s resort to McCarthy-era repression and imprisonment of political dissidents was considered by experienced activists at that time, the US ruling class’s mini-experiment with fascism. It came at a time when the post-WWII mass revulsion against the just-defeated Nazis occupation of Europe, especially in France and Italy, focused on mass Communist Party-led mobilizations that extracted major concessions from the largely discredited post-war governments. These near working class rebellions extracted a broad range of unprecedented social democratic, wage, labor and employment security victories from these weakened capitalist states, whose wartime governments were Nazis collaborators. At that time the French and Italian Communist Parties were the largest in the country.

A fearful US ruling class, especially in the context of the 1946 US strike wave that saw the largest number of workers on strike in US history, calculated that fascist-like repression in the US itself might be a pre-requisite to continued ruling class stability.

But, the post-WWII period essentially left US capitalism intact, with its wartime industrial infrastructure massively expanded, while its former European competitors’ economies lay in ruins. The US dominated the world economy as never before, with both its wartime allies and enemies largely destroyed.  This led the US elite to at least in part back off from implementing the more virulent forms of brutal fascist rule, but not before a frightened ruling class enacted over the course of a decade and longer a body of reactionary legislation aimed at essentially terrorizing, if not effectively outlawing Communist Party members and their associated organizations. The Constitutional protections of civil liberties were shredded in the name of subordinating free speech and the right to association to so-called US national security interests. This was codified in the US Supreme Court majority decisions authored by Chief Justice Felix Frankfurter wherein the First Amendment’s guaranteed free speech and free association rights had to be “balanced” against the “national Security interests” of the US government. Frankfurter’s court “balancing” scale always came down on the side of the government’s “national security.” Subpoenaed HUAC witnesses who, citing the First Amendment, refused to
“name names” or admit membership in the CP, were cited for “contempt of congress” and often jailed. The witchhunt was on.

Immediately prior to the witchhunt, the Stalinist-led US Communist Party led some one-third of the US labor movement organized in the powerful Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO). “Peaceful co-existence” with capitalism was the CP credo. In 1945 the USSR’s head of state, Joseph Stalin, the US wartime ally, appeared on the front page of the popular Life magazine and was endearingly referred to as “Uncle Joe.” Moreover, the CP itself proposed continuing its wartime patriotic, pro-employer  “no strike pledge” into the postwar period, again, at the time of the largest strike wave in US history! This, is itself, helped to discredit the CP in the eyes of many workers. Further, on Stalin’s orders, in 1946, under Earl Browder’s leadership, the CP itself was formally dissolved!

Origins of the Cold War

None of this, however, convinced US imperialism to back off from its witchhunt. Rebuilding and re-arming European capitalism and restoring its badly tarnished Nazis collaborationist image became US imperialism’s major focus. A “Cold War” was decreed; at its center was bringing down the “Iron Curtain,” that is, the pro-Russian governments that were established across Eastern Europe following the USSR’s Red Army victories that were centrally responsible for Hitler’s defeats. With 90 percent of Hitler’s armies on the Russian front, the USSR’s losses, at 27 million dead, came close to exceeding the total losses of the entire world. Smashing Russia’s credibility became US imperialism’s central priority. The witchhunt was critical to this US objective. The US establishment of NATO in Europe aimed at challenging the Soviet-backed and established deformed workers’ states in Eastern Europe that a few years after the end of WWII, abolished capitalism via the election of various indigenous Communist Parties that replaced the largely discredited parties that had collaborated with the Nazis occupation.

But with CPUSA’s acquiescence and its consciously posing zero threat to US imperialism at home, the ruling class saw no need for a US fascist repression of the Hitlerian type to defend its interests.

McCarthy himself, a rightwing Wisconsin US Senator, was quickly discredited. He was publically pilloried during the widely televised Army-McCarthy congressional hearings, isolated and removed from office. But the McCarthy-era’s witchhunt, anti-democratic, anti-labor and anti-civil liberties laws that his generation introduced were allowed to linger for decades. The capitalists of that era, and today, had no reason to chaage or remove any repressive legislation that aided their ”right to profit.” “Anti-communism” and fear of dissent was drilled into the consciousness of millions and remained there for decades until a new youth rebellion combined with the dramatic Black-led Civil Rights and Vietnam antiwar movements to fundamentally break with the witchhunt’s “better dead than red” mentality.  It was only during this period, some two decades later, when the new mass movements once again dominated public life, that the US Supreme Court, via Chief Justice Earl Warren’s 5-4 majority, repeatedly ruled that most of the McCarthy-era legislation was “unconstitutional.”

Today’s ruling class faces qualitatively less of a threat from the organized labor movement than during late 1930s and 40s. That labor upsurge raised trade union membership from an all tine low to some 36 percent of all US workers, and especially the workers in basic industry.

Today, organized labor, with a largely corrupt mis-leadership, subordinate to the Democratic Party, stands once again at an historic low, at best representing six percent of the private sector workforce. The fight today is not only to restore basic democratic functioning and rank-and-file union control to the existing unions but to massively “organize the unorganized” working class and unite this consequently reinvigorated fighting labor movement in struggle with the growing movements of all the oppressed and exploited.

Today’s intra-capitalist debates

The capitalist elite are no newcomers to their history. The debates today among and between its different components – openly racist and covertly racist, pro-war and “antiwar/Trump,” “pro” or anti-abortion, for or against free speech, for or against Trump’s January 6, 2022 coup attempt, for or against seriously addressing the climate crisis, endemic unemployment, poverty, etc. all reflect the base uncertainly among capitalism’s US rulers as their rotten system confronts or fails to confront one crisis after another.

We can only speculate today what forms of capitalist repression and violence will be deployed by the ruling class, whether from the Trump minority wing that increasingly spouts fascist-type rhetoric , or from the Democrats, who are skilled at orchestrating every form of horrific violence against working people the world over, and in the US too, if they deem it necessary.!

Both wings of capitalism’s twin parties of war, racism, repression and poverty are closely watching today’s unfolding youth radicalization, more fearful than in decades that it cannot be reined into the safe channels of capitalist electoral politics.

In the face of their own inexorably deepening crises, resort to violent repression can never be excluded. Indeed, it is the iron rule deeply-imbedded in all capitalist minority ruled societies.

The ruling elite understand full well that a consciously-organized working class led by experienced revolutionary fighters deeply embedded in every struggle of the day poses the only serious threat to its future capacity to exploit and oppress to keep their system of minority rule intact and in power.

Socialist politics

The alternative society that revolutionary socialists aim to help construct begins with organizing and empowering the vast majority of capitalism’s victims in all their varied races, creeds, sexes, sexual orientations, and national origins. Revolutionary socialists aim at organizing this vast majority into a disciplined deeply-rooted mass revolutionary socialist party aimed at ending capitalist minority rule. We also aim at helping to construct a mass independent, democratically-organized union-based Labor Party to carry workers’ battles at the point of production into the electoral arena. Such a Labor Party, armed with a socialist program, can help lead the fight for a workers’ government aimed at the abolition of capitalist corporate rule.

We aim at ushering into being a new and egalitarian society free from every form of discrimination and inequality.

Today, much of the “old left” has tragically been decimated, demoralized, and/or demobilized under the pressures of relative capitalist stability, and especially via the constant pressures to be drawn into capitalist “lesser evil” electoral politics, whether it be of the DSA, or Bernie Sanders, or corporate-funded NGO-financed projects aimed at channeling promising movements back into “the system.” As the 2024 elections approach we are once again presented with the “choice” between electing the corporate Democrat’s reactionary, racist, Biden over the corporate Republican’s reactionary, racist Trump! We reject this “choice” and instead stand proudly among today’s champions of independent mass mobilizations against capitalist injustice and genocide in Gaza and in solidarity with the world’s people fighting for freedom and liberation.

The connection between Palestine and Ferguson

Today’s courageous US youth are highlighting the connections between fighting racism at home and abroad, between solidarity with Palestine and solidarity Ferguson, between opposition to the US-backed Zionist genocide in Gaza and opposition to the US war machine everywhere and against US systemic racism at home.

Jeff Mackler is a staffwriter for Socialist Action. He can be reached at jmackler@lmi.net  socialist action.org


Migration as Economic Imperialism

 
 JANUARY 5, 2024
Facebook

Dorothea Lange: Toward Los Angeles, California, 1937 – Public Domain

Numbering an estimated 169 million, [1] international migrant laborers are generally regarded in mainstream economic circles as playing a substantial role in poverty alleviation and economic development in their home countries. This is accomplished, it is asserted, through remittances sent home by migrants, reaching an estimated $647 billion arriving in low- and moderate-income countries in 2022, a total that surpasses foreign direct investment in those nations. [2] As one World Bank policy researcher explains, remittances “have a profound impact on the living standards of people in the developing countries of Asia, Africa, Latin America and the Middle East.” [3]

In his latest book, Migration as Economic Imperialism, political analyst Immanuel Ness challenges and complicates that simplified narrative, situating the global migrant labor system in the broader context of the long history of resource and labor extraction between the Global North and Global South. Ness argues that labor migration programs are “unrelated to efforts to create equality” as they transfer wealth from low- and mid-income countries to advanced capitalist nations. Concomitantly, there is a secondary process of internal rural-to-urban and South-South migration to provide labor in global production networks to serve multinational capital.

Ness points out that while migrant workers send money home to assist their families in meeting basic needs, this practice “represents an individualistic solution to a systemic crisis of inequality.” While remittances may help to pay for education, housing, or healthcare for individual families, they accomplish nothing in advancing national development and building infrastructure in society as a whole. As such, narrowly and unevenly dispersed remittances cannot be regarded as an engine of development.

Furthermore, by siphoning so many workers into an international system that serves Western capital, poor- and medium-income countries are drained of skilled and unskilled labor from domestic development. This relationship can be regarded as a form of economic imperialism.

Neoliberal economic practices propel the expansion of migrant labor, undermining and reducing full-time positions with decent pay and benefits in underdeveloped nations. The geographic shift of manufacturing to the Global South in the late twentieth century had at its base a nonunionized workforce converted into performing precarious and informal low-wage tasks in short-term positions for specific production needs.

It is not only capitalist productive forces that are served. Many migrant women provide domestic care for affluent families in host countries, living in employers’ homes. Migrant women risk deportation if they incur the wrath of their employees by failing to meet unreasonable demands. Quite frequently, migrant homecare workers are subjected to abuse, withholding of wages, and restricted freedom of movement.

Right-wing parties in host nations politicize the presence of migrants, misdirecting resentment away from the capitalist structural causes for income inequality and encouraging intolerance for migrant victims of the same economic system. There is a tension between reliance by businesses on low-wage migrant labor and appeals to nativist sentiments, which on one level are at cross-purposes. Yet, restrictive measures hurl migrants into an abyss of vulnerability that provides opportunities for businesses to violate wage and safety regulations and extract additional surplus value from this exploited workforce.

Mounting xenophobia places obstacles in the path of migrants, even as they serve capitalist interests in developed capitalist states. As the policing of borders is militarized, the cost to migrants rises. More workers fall into the undocumented category, which “allows destination states to control the number of migrant laborers via shifting enforcement.”

In the United States, the criminalization of temporary migrant labor leads to limited access to or exclusion from essential health and safety services. In Western Europe, the restrictions placed on migrants originating from outside the Schengen Area do not reduce the extent of migration; instead, a higher percentage of migrants are in an unauthorized status, facing constant threat of deportation, and often enduring harsher living circumstances. Furthermore, restrictions tend to burden migrants with the need to pay smugglers or traffickers, and those who lack resources are more likely to be exposed to debt peonage arrangements or forced labor. Restrictive measures also increase the incidence of fraud, where a migrant pays to be brought into another country, only to find that the promised job is nonexistent or other than promised. Opportunities such as these to abuse vulnerable workers multiply. Moreover, a labor system based on super-exploitation has knock-on effects throughout the rest of society in a host country. “The creation of a stratified system of migrants,” Ness remarks, “undermines the rights of all workers.”

In addition to a macroanalysis of global migrant labor, the book also zeroes in on four case studies: Nepal, Vietnam, El Salvador, and Moldova, demonstrating the impact of the migrant labor system on a micro level. In the case of Nepal, the nation remains underdeveloped, with a large majority of the population engaged in farming. The country is a major training center for prospective migrant workers able to afford the fees, recruitment, and travel. Typically, trained workers are bound for low-wage employment in East Asia or the Arab Gulf. Astonishingly, Nepal’s largest “industry” is temporary foreign migration. In essence, the nation is an appendage of foreign capitalist interests. The migrant labor system tends to suck primarily young workers out of the domestic economy, thereby creating “labor shortages in key sectors of the Nepalese economy, agriculture and essential jobs in medicine, education, construction and infrastructure.” Because Nepal’s GDP is highly dependent on remittances, its economy is inherently unstable due to fluctuations in demand for migrant labor.

There is also a personal social cost to migrant labor in that workers are forced into long-term separation from spouses, children, family, and friends. Childcare is often left to the extended family, who remain behind. By the time a migrant worker returns home, absence may have done irreparable harm to a marriage, leading to separation. In some cases, children are left to manage on their own. According to Ness, “The separation of families is a contributing factor in the rise of crime and gang violence in El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and other countries highly dependent on migration.”

Reliance on migrant labor is an inseparable component of global capitalism. The hostility to “government and political solutions to inequities triggered by the dictates of rich countries,” Ness explains, has produced “a situation which confers freedom on capital but not to labor.” It is clear that international labor in the neoliberal global economy constitutes “an extreme form of economic imperialism that ignores the security and welfare of the poor in the Global South.”

In this well-researched and informative book, Ness digs into multiple facets of the global economy of migration. In its relentless pursuit of profit, capital increasingly depends on migrant labor, producing growing precarity across many segments of society. The essential role of migrant labor in global capitalism tends to be underappreciated, and Ness performs a valuable service in exposing the widespread and destabilizing dynamics of that process.

Notes.

[1] “ILO Global Estimates on International Migrant Workers: Results and Methodology,” International Labour Organization, June 30, 2021.

[2] Dilip Ratha, Sonia Plaza, Eung Ju Kim, Vandana Chandra, Nyasha Kurasha, and Baran Pradhan, “Migration and Development Brief 38: Remittances Remain Resilient But Are Slowing,” KNOMAD–World Bank, June 2023.

[3] Richard H. Adams, Jr. and John Page, “International Migration, Remittances, and Poverty in Developing Countries,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3179, December 2003.

Gregory Elich is a Korea Policy Institute board member. He is a contributor to the collection, Sanctions as War: Anti-Imperialist Perspectives on American Geo-Economic Strategy (Haymarket Books, 2023). His website is https://gregoryelich.org  Follow him on Twitter at @GregoryElich.      


Billionaire Bunker Bastards


 
 JANUARY 5, 2024
Facebook

Photo by Nandor Muzsik

It’s making the rounds on social media, references to something like 15 billionaires working on end of the world style bunkers. Considerable effort has been put into debunking some of these numbers, and it’s difficult to find clear evidence of that many, but there is certainly some truth to where there is an intake and exhaust vent there’s a fraud below. It is fairly amazing to consider the vast societal infrastructure and labor that allowed these billionaires to grow and metastasize are precisely what these bloated pillagers are now looking to hide from. Even non-billionaire, but billionaire adjacent/accomplice Joe Biden is said to be building one in Delaware (that one is pretty hard to pin down and prove though). What is that saying? When people show you who they are, believe them? Perhaps if the wealthy show you that they realize they are creating an untenable and dangerous world necessitating that they hide in a den, perhaps we should believe them and maybe try to stop them from creating a world so terrible you need to go subterranean to survive.

Rumors definitely swirl about numerous underground locations and possible nefarious plots surrounding the sites. Some of the stories are probably ridiculous, but I suspect truth behind at least some of the tales. People who indicated that something was up (or down) at The Greenbrier Resort in West Virginia over the years were ridiculed until it came out that yes, underneath the hotel was a spot hollowed out for the continuation of Congress during the Eisenhower years. Now you can go on a “Bunker Tour” for $47 per person, which includes sales tax! Places definitely are set aside for continuation of this hellscape, places likely with a purpose for those more powerful, wealthy and connected than the vast majority of us. It would be foolish to think there aren’t plan Z’s in place for those individuals. They know what a shitshow they’ve created up here.

A particular favorite place I enjoy digging into for elite bastard conspiracy lore is Denver International Airport. If you’ve been there, perhaps you’ve noticed the unique greeting at the entrance from “The Blue Mustang”, also known informally to his friends as Blucifer. An enormous and very angry looking horse, that one. He kind of sets the tone for the place. The red eyed stallion fell on his creator, sculptor Luis JimĂ©nez during its creation and severed an artery in the artist’s leg, eventually killing him. That is, killing Luis–Blucifer is very much alive, as his red eyes and lust for continued destruction attest. Anyway, the construction of the airport went way over budget and a lot of it had to do with massive earth-moving. They say it was a failed attempt at creating a new type of baggage transit network underground. Those of a conspiracy ilk say that’s a perfect cover for creating The Greenbrier times one thousand under there. It doesn’t help that the artwork of the place has a distinctly dystopian feel, complete with people in gas-masks and other not really feel-good art for the masses. What are they trying to say to us? Denver International has leaned into the Illuminati rumors and often stages practical jokes: a “leaked” April 1st online page had details about “a private site for our new ‘elite’ New World Order travelers who value privacy and exclusivity.” Hiding in plain (plane?) site underground, I’d say.

We can even thank Obama for some of the recent interest in underground bunkers and end of the world scenarios. I am about to do spoilers for the Netflix movie Leave the World Behind. But trust me, don’t watch it. Obama was referring to this movie’s test screening audience when he said “we tortured some folks”. Yes, this movie sucks. The Obamas are executive producers of it through their “Higher Ground Productions”…..higher ground—hmmm, who the hell do they think they are fooling with that name? Anyway, the movie ends with this kid discovering the only thing that looks to save humanity……a well stocked bunker with Alexandria library level civilization finds such as dvds of Friends. Maybe that’s what the original library of Alexandria contained, and if so, I’m glad they let it burn.

But this bunker zeitgeist is everywhere these days. The latest foray into bunker building that has really captured major attention is the sprawling underground compound construction on Kauai from Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Estimates for cost place it at up to 270 million dollars if land prices are included (truly chump change for him)– but certainly enough cash when thrown around a small island, paired with non-disclosure agreements, to wreak havoc for local autonomy, flora, fauna, and per capita asshole numbers. It’s a 1400 acre compound with a reported 5,000 square foot underground shelter. Considering that this is but one of Zuckerberg’s over the top properties, it makes a person wonder how many social ills could be alleviated or eliminated with the resources this Smaug impersonator is keeping to himself. He could probably end homelessness with the sale of his Augustus Caesar statues alone. But then his wife wouldn’t be able to replicate his haircuts with such precision without them.

Bunkers have been lurking in the American psyche for decades now. A particular moment in time for them was the Cold War era. Why back then even a one income family with the mom in the home could build their own doomsday bunker! Just another example of how far America has fallen. Average Americans could indulge their misanthropic fantasies, now it’s only for the elite! JFK was urging Americans to build one…..“fallout protection for every American as rapidly as possible”.

It’s definitely a uniquely American notion to heavy handily promote an unstable world and the first answer to it isn’t a change in behavior or a lighter footprint on the backs of places like the global south…. or even facing obvious existential questions about how the world clicked along for millennia without a need to hide underground (yes nerds, I know about Derinkuyu in Turkey, but you know what I mean)….no the obvious answer is to piss everyone off internationally and then hide in a den because you’ve shit the surface. The billionaires are the modern and distilled version of this. All of the toxic trends of the past melted down into creepy “they walk with us” individuals that exemplify the worst of late-stage capitalistic hegemony.

But all of this said, deep-down I’m an American and I don’t plan to push for any kind of collective solution to these daunting and systemic problems we face. I may not be a billionaire, just a temporarily embarrassed non-bunker owner, but I am setting that straight. I will dig my own bunker. I am setting down my shovel for a moment to write this, but I must continue to dig: “She loves to limbo, that much is clear. She’s got the right dynamic for the new frontier.”

Kathleen Wallace writes out of the US Midwest. Her writing is collected on her Substack page.

California Faculty Association Escalates Strike Actions Ahead of Contract Battle


Demands include paid family leave, gender-inclusive restrooms, rules for expanding workloads and campus police reforms.

By Dana Cloud
January 7, 2024
The California Faculty Association's week of strikes continues at the Cal State LA campus in Los Angeles, California, on December 6, 2023.
BRITTANY MURRAY / MEDIANEWS GROUP / LONG BEACH PRESS-TELEGRAM VIA GETTY IMAGES


Truthout is a vital news source and a living history of political struggle. If you think our work is valuable, support us with a donation of any size.

The California Faculty Association (CFA), representing 29 thousand faculty at the 23 campuses of the California State University (CSU), held a series of rolling strikes against the largest public university system in the United States in December. The union has been engaged in contract reopener talks in advance of a full contract battle later this year.

The union has demanded a 12 percent pay raise for all faculty as well as additional raises in the wages of the lowest-paid faculty across the campuses. In addition, the CFA is asking for an extension in paid family leave to one semester, gender-inclusive restrooms and lactation spaces, greater support for mental health counseling services on campus, regulation of faculty members’ ever-expanding workloads, and reforms in campus policing limiting armed police interaction with faculty members.

The CSU system has refused to meet these demands, instead offering a five percent raise in the first year, with subsequent raises contingent on budgetary constraints. As union leaders are quick to point out, “contingent” almost always means “never.” After the 2021 contract, faculty learned this lesson the hard way, as promised raises evaporated in the name of budget shortfalls. The system also has been unresponsive to the union’s other demands.

In response to the system’s recalcitrance, the union began a series of one-day strikes at campuses across the state in December. These strikes targeted Cal State Sacramento, Cal State Los Angeles, Cal Poly Pomona, and San Francisco State University.

Teamsters Local 2010 members held sympathy strikes and turned up as early as 5 a.m. on the four campuses to shut down construction sites (which can cause inconveniences to employers and lead to more serious problems like contract disputes), block mail delivery, slow traffic, and reroute public transit.

RELATED STORY

Senate Democrats Warn Auto Makers to Not Interfere With Sweeping UAW Union Drive
The lawmakers raised concern that some automakers have already engaged in illegal anti-union moves.
By Sharon Zhang , TRUTHOUT  January 4, 2024


Faculty and supporters at Cal State Los Angeles marched onto a freeway to make their point.

Labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta delivered a message to striking members via CSU Los Angeles Lecturer Jamila Guerrero-Cantor:

Your work as educators must be respected. The decision-makers of the CSU system are failing to uphold the mission of public education by continuing inequities that will push people out of the transformative experience of higher education. You are striking because you believe in the power of education and the power of organizing labor.

Backed up Southern-California style by a mariachi band and dancers supporting the Cal Poly picket line on December 4, faculty and students described the goals of the strike. Kristin Prins is in her 8th year on the Pomona faculty in English and Modern Languages. As a graduate student, she had been involved in successful graduate student organizing at the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. She explained that the experience was a turning point “in knowing the value of the union”:


When I was on the job market, coming to a unionized campus was really important to me. I was glad to come here and join the CFA. My first year on campus was in 2016. During that contract negotiation, we had t-shirts reading, “I don’t want to strike but I will.” The night before the strike was to start, we got more than we were asking for.

Prins said she is shocked that the system has not moved in response to a fact-finding process that supported the union’s claims. She is concerned about the problem of the insufficient counseling staff on campuses: “Students are really, really going through it; many of our full-time students are working full-time across multiple jobs. They need much better support,” she said.

Prins reported workload stress, since many faculty and staff retired during the COVID-19 pandemic. “More and more work has been spread across fewer and fewer people. Students see that and feel that.”

Most important for Prins is raising the floor of wages for non-tenure-line faculty, who teach the greatest number of students while commuting from campus to campus to make ends meet.


I coordinate the first-year writing program. All of my colleagues are teaching first-year comp[osition] without the benefit of being full-time. These are the faculty who are points of first contact for first-year students. We rely on them for all kinds of things, student success and student retention. We really need to raise the floor for them.

Cal Poly civil engineering professor Siddarth Banerjee stressed the need for raises for tenure-line faculty, too. “I am new faculty here,” he said, adding,


I’m new to this process. It’s been a very big shift for us as a family. It’s very expensive. Right now, more than half of my salary goes to rent. It’s very difficult to make ends meet. I’m hoping that the strike will make management listen and give us raises.

Groups of students came out at Pomona to support the faculty. Carson Green is a Cal Poly student and a member of the Young Democratic Socialists of America (YDSA). He explained that faculty workload has intensified during his time as a student, with average class sizes rising from thirty to more than fifty. “It’s important for every student to be out here in solidarity,” he said.

Another Pomona student, Kaila Cervantes, explained that supporting her faculty was very important because of the profound role professors have played in her life.


My professors changed my intellectual course and I feel that they are vital to my education and the campus. I’m out here to support them because they fight for me in the classroom and I can support them outside the classroom.

Prins remarked that her students have been amazing in their support for the strike. She lamented that being real with them about faculty labor in an increasingly corporate university disillusions them about the academy:

It’s been really hard to be honest with students about the university as an employer. I was an undergraduate who got to school and thought, look at this ivory tower where everyone is so enlightened and where we are building a new world that we want to see. But the university is not that; it probably has never been that. It’s been heartbreaking for students to come in with so much belief in education and then there’s so much we’re fighting against just for them to have that education.

CFA members remain committed and confident. The CFA has declared a system-wide strike of all faculty on 23 campuses from January 22-26, announcing: “Given the ongoing disregard of management, the CFA Board of Directors have called for a five-day strike between January 22 — January 26 that will take place on all 23 CSU campuses. We will be striking with Teamsters Local 2010 members as we collectively push for a fair contract for our workers. United, we will let CSU management know that we are ready to shut down the CSU.”

These actions are part of a nationwide upsurge in higher education organizing, called the “golden age of academic unionization” by the Chronicle of Higher Education. The Chronicle noted that graduate student workers at the University of Southern California, just ahead of a strike planned for November 26, won a $40,000 starting salary for graduate students, followed by yearly raises over the contract term. The agreement also secured the rights to grievance and arbitration and child care stipends.

They also won semester-long paid parental leave.

“We want that too,” Prins said.


DANA CLOUD  is a professor of communication studies at the University of Texas.
Supreme Court Upholds Idaho Law Jailing Doctors Who Provide Abortions

“This is a chilling reminder that the anti-abortion movement doesn’t care if women live or die,” wrote one Senator.
January 7, 2024

A sign is taped to a hanger taped to a streetlight in front of the Idaho Capitol in Boise, Idaho.
SARAH A. MILLER / IDAHO STATESMAN / TRIBUNE NEWS SERVICE VIA GETTY IMAGES


Truthout is a vital news source and a living history of political struggle. If you think our work is valuable, support us with a donation of any size.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday opted to reinstate Idaho’s near-total abortion ban, a draconian law that carries up to five years in prison for doctors who perform the procedure outside of extremely narrow circumstances.

The high court, which overturned the constitutional right to abortion in the summer of 2022, agreed to hear a Justice Department challenge to Idaho’s abortion ban in April. In the meantime, it will be a crime in Idaho to perform or attempt to perform an abortion unless the procedure is deemed “necessary to prevent the death of the pregnant woman” or if the pregnancy was a result of rape or incest.

“SCOTUS just allowed Idaho to throw health care providers in jail for providing emergency abortion care while they consider this case,” Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) wrote in response to the Supreme Court’s order. “This is a chilling reminder that the anti-abortion movement doesn’t care if women live or die — as long as they’re forced to give birth.”

The Justice Department argued in its lawsuit that Idaho’s abortion ban conflicts with a federal law requiring Medicare-funded hospitals to provide certain stabilizing treatments, including abortion care.

“Beyond care necessary to prevent death, the law provides no defense whatsoever when the health of the pregnant patient is at stake,” the department’s legal challenge reads. “And, even in dire situations that might qualify for the Idaho law’s limited ‘necessary to prevent the death of the pregnant woman’ affirmative defense, some providers could withhold care based on a well-founded fear of criminal prosecution.”

RELATED STORY

Florida Advocates Collect Enough Signatures to Get Abortion on 2024 Ballot
“What a huge milestone for abortion access in our state,” Floridians Protecting Freedom said.

By Zane McNeill , TRUTHOUT January 5, 2024

The department warned that if Idaho’s law is permitted to stay in effect, it will prevent healthcare professionals from performing abortions “even when a doctor determines that abortion is the medically necessary treatment to prevent severe risk to the patient’s health and even in cases where denial of care will likely result in death for the pregnant patient.”

The Supreme Court’s unsigned order came days after the conservative-dominated 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Texas can ban abortions even in emergency situations. In Texas and across the U.S., people have faced dangerous health complications after being denied abortion care due to Republican-authored laws in their states.

Many have been forced to travel out of state to obtain care. One Idaho woman “sought an abortion in [Oregon] after doctors told her she would likely miscarry and, if she continued the pregnancy, develop a life-threatening condition,” The Idaho Statesman reported last month.

“Her trip to Oregon put so much financial strain on the family, they were unable to pay their mortgage for a month,” the newspaper added.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said Friday that the Supreme Court’s order allowing Idaho’s ban to take effect is “dangerous and exceptionally cruel.”

“Now, doctors in the state cannot perform abortions even in medical emergencies,” Warren added. “Yet again, women’s lives are at the mercy of this extreme Court stacked by Donald Trump.”