Tuesday, January 09, 2024

SPACE

Three iron rings in a planet-forming disk


A three-ringed structure in the planet-forming zone of a circumstellar disk where metals and minerals serve as a reservoir of planetary building blocks


Peer-Reviewed Publication

MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR ASTRONOMY

Artist’s concept of the three-ringed structure in the planet-forming disk around HD 144432 

IMAGE: 

OBSERVATIONS WITH THE EUROPEAN SOUTHERN OBSERVATORY’S (ESO) VERY LARGE TELESCOPE INTERFEROMETER (VLTI) FOUND VARIOUS SILICATE COMPOUNDS AND POTENTIALLY IRON, SUBSTANCES WE ALSO FIND IN LARGE AMOUNTS IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM’S ROCKY PLANETS.

view more 

CREDIT: © JENRY




The origin of Earth and the Solar System inspires scientists and the public alike. By studying the present state of our home planet and other objects in the Solar System, researchers have developed a detailed picture of the conditions when they evolved from a disk made of dust and gas surrounding the infant sun some 4.5 billion years ago.

Three rings hinting at two planets

With the breathtaking progress made in star and planet formation research aiming at far-away celestial objects, we can now investigate the conditions in environments around young stars and compare them to the ones derived for the early Solar System. Using the European Southern Observatory’s (ESO) Very Large Telescope Interferometer (VLTI), an international team of researchers led by József Varga from the Konkoly Observatory in Budapest, Hungary, did just that. They observed the planet-forming disk of the young star HD 144432, approximately 500 light-years away.

When studying the dust distribution in the disk’s innermost region, we detected for the first time a complex structure in which dust piles up in three concentric rings in such an environment,” says Roy van Boekel. He is a scientist at the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (MPIA) in Heidelberg, Germany and a co-author of the underlying research article to appear in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics. “That region corresponds to the zone where the rocky planets formed in the Solar System“, van Boekel adds. Compared to the Solar System, the first ring around HD 144432 lies within Mercury’s orbit, and the second is close to Mars’s trajectory. Moreover, the third ring roughly corresponds to Jupiter’s orbit.

Up to now, astronomers have found such configurations predominantly on larger scales corresponding to the realms beyond where Saturn circles the Sun. Ring systems in the disks around young stars generally point to planets forming within the gaps as they accumulate dust and gas on their way. However, HD 144432 is the first example of such a complex ring system so close to its host star. It occurs in a zone rich in dust, the building block of rocky planets like Earth. Assuming the rings indicate the presence of two planets forming within the gaps, the astronomers estimated their masses to resemble roughly that of Jupiter.

Conditions may be similar to the early Solar System

The astronomers determined the dust composition across the disk up to a separation from the central star that corresponds to the distance of Jupiter from the Sun. What they found is very familiar to scientists studying Earth and the rocky planets in the Solar System: various silicates (metal-silicon-oxygen compounds) and other minerals present in Earth’s crust and mantle, and possibly metallic iron as is present in Mercury’s and Earth’s cores. If confirmed, this study would be the first to have discovered iron in a planet-forming disk.

Astronomers have thus far explained the observations of dusty disks with a mixture of carbon and silicate dust, materials that we see almost everywhere in the Universe,” van Boekel explains. However, from a chemical perspective an iron and silicate mixture is more plausible for the hot, inner disk regions. And indeed, the chemical model that Varga, the main author of the underlying research article, applied to the data yields better-fitting results when introducing iron instead of carbon.

Furthermore, the dust observed in the HD 144432 disk can be as hot as 1800 Kelvin (approx. 1500 degrees Celsius) at the inner edge and as moderate as 300 Kelvin (approx. 25 degrees Celsius) farther out. Minerals and iron melt and recondense, often as crystals, in the hot regions near the star. In turn, carbon grains would not survive the heat and instead be present as carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide gas. However, carbon may still be a significant constituent of the solid particles in the cold outer disk, which the observations carried out for this study cannot trace.

Iron-rich and carbon-poor dust would also fit nicely with the conditions in the Solar System. Mercury and Earth are iron-rich planets, while the Earth contains relatively little carbon. “We think that the HD 144432 disk may be very similar to the early Solar System that provided lots of iron to the rocky planets we know today,” says van Boekel. ”Our study may pose as another example showing that the composition of our Solar System may be quite typical.

Interferometry resolves tiny details

Retrieving the results was only possible with exceptionally high-resolution observations, as provided by the VLTI. By combining the four VLT 8.2-metre telescopes at ESO’s Paranal Observatory, they can resolve details as if astronomers would employ a telescope with a primary mirror of 200 metres in diameter. Varga, van Boekel and their collaborators obtained data using three instruments to achieve a broad wavelength coverage ranging from 1.6 to 13 micrometres, representing infrared light.

MPIA provided vital technological elements to two devices, GRAVITY and the Multi AperTure mid-Infrared SpectroScopic Experiment (MATISSE). One of MATISSE’s primary purposes is to investigate the rocky planet-forming zones of disks around young stars. “By looking at the inner regions of protoplanetary disks around stars, we aim to explore the origin of the various minerals contained in the disk – minerals that later will form the solid components of planets like the Earth,” says Thomas Henning, MPIA director and co-PI of the MATISSE instrument.

However, producing images with an interferometer like the ones we are used to obtaining from single telescopes is not straightforward and very time-consuming. A more efficient use of precious observing time to decipher the object structure is to compare the sparse data to models of potential target configurations. In the case of the HD 144432 disk, a three-ringed structure represents the data best.

How common are structured, iron-rich planet-forming disks?

Besides the Solar System, HD 144432 appears to provide another example of planets forming in an iron-rich environment. However, the astronomers will not stop there. “We still have a few promising candidates waiting for the VLTI to take a closer look at”, van Boekel points out. In earlier observations, the team discovered a number of disks around young stars that indicate configurations worth revisiting. However, they will reveal their detailed structure and chemistry using the latest VLTI instrumentation. Eventually, the astronomers may be able to clarify whether planets commonly form in iron-rich dusty disks close to their parent stars.

 

Background information

The MPIA researchers involved in this study are Roy van Boekel, Marten Scheuck, Thomas Henning, Jacob W. Isbell, Ágnes Kóspál (also HUN-REN Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, Konkoly Observatory, Budapest, Hungary [Konkoly]; CSFK, MTA Centre of Excellence, Budapest, Hungary [CSFK]; ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary [ELTE]), Alessio Caratti o Garatti (also INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Naples, Italy).

Other contributors are: J. Varga (Konkoly; CSFK; Leiden Observatory, The Netherlands [Leiden]), L. B. F. M. Waters (Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; SRON, Leiden, The Netherlands), M. Hogerheijde (Leiden; University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands [UVA]), A. Matter (Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur/CNRS, Nice, France [OCA]), B. Lopez (OCA), K. Perraut (Univ. Grenoble Alpes/CNRS/IPAG, France [IPAG]), L. Chen (Konkoly; CSFK), D. Nadella (Leiden), S. Wolf (University of Kiel, Germany [UK]), C. Dominik (UVA), P. Abraham (Konkoly; CSFK; ELTE), J.-C. Augereau (IPAG), P. Boley (OCA), G. Bourdarot (Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching, Germany), F. Cruz-Saénz de Miera (Konkoly; CSFK; Université de Toulouse, France), W. C. Danchi (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, USA), V. Gámez Rosas (Leiden), K.-H. Hofmann (Max-Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy, Bonn, Germany [MPIfR]), M. Houllé (OCA), W. Jaffe (Leiden), T. Juhász (Konkoly; CSFK; ELTE), V. Kecskeméthy (ELTE), J. Kobus (UK), E. Kokoulina (University of Liège, Belgium; OCA), L. Labadie (University of Cologne, Germany), F. Lykou (Konkoly; CSFK), F. Millour (OCA), A. Moór (Konkoly; CSFK), N. Morujão (Universidade de Lisboa and Universidade do Porto, Portugal), E. Pantin (AIM, CEA/CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France), D. Schertl (MPIfR), L. van Haastere (Leiden), G. Weigelt (MPIfR), J. Woillez (European Southern Observatory, Garching, Germany), P. Woitke (Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz, Austria), MATISSE and GRAVITY Collaborations

 

Evolution is not as random as previously thought, finds a new study


Peer-Reviewed Publication

UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM





A groundbreaking study has found that evolution is not as unpredictable as previously thought, which could allow scientists to explore which genes could be useful to tackle real-world issues such as antibiotic resistance, disease and climate change.

The study, which is published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)challenges the long-standing belief about the unpredictability of evolution, and has found that the evolutionary trajectory of a genome may be influenced by its evolutionary history, rather than determined by numerous factors and historical accidents.

The study was led by Professor James McInerney and Dr. Alan Beavan from the School of Life Sciences at the University of Nottingham, and Dr. Maria Rosa Domingo-Sananes from Nottingham Trent University.

“The implications of this research are nothing short of revolutionary," said Professor McInerney, the lead author of the study. "By demonstrating that evolution is not as random as we once thought, we've opened the door to an array of possibilities in synthetic biology, medicine, and environmental science."

The team carried out an analysis of the pangenome - the complete set of genes within a given species, to answer a critical question of whether evolution is predictable or whether the evolutionary paths of genomes are dependent on their history and so not predictable today.

Using a machine learning approach known as Random Forest, along with a dataset of 2,500 complete genomes from a single bacterial species, the team carried out several hundred thousand hours of computer processing to address the question.

After feeding the data into their high-performance computer, the team first made "gene families" from each of the gene of each genome.

"In this way, we could compare like-with-like across the genomes", said Dr. Domingo-Sananes.

Once the families had been identified, the team analysed the pattern of how these families were present in some genomes and absent in others.

"We found that some gene families never turned up in a genome when a particular other gene family was already there, and on other occasions, some genes were very much dependent on a different gene family being present.”

In effect, the researchers discovered an invisible ecosystem where genes can cooperate or can be in conflict with one another.

"These interactions between genes make aspects of evolution somewhat predictable and furthermore, we now have a tool that allows us to make those predictions,” adds Dr. Domingo-Sananes.

Dr Beavan said: “From this work, we can begin to explore which genes "support" an antibiotic resistance gene, for example. Therefore, if we are trying to eliminate antibiotic resistance, we can target not just the focal gene, but we can also target its supporting genes.

“We can use this approach to synthesise new kinds of genetic constructs that could be used to develop new drugs or vaccines. Knowing what we now know has opened the door to a whole host of other discoveries.”

The implications of the research are far-reaching and could lead to –

  • Novel Genome Design – allowing scientists to design synthetic genomes, providing a roadmap for the predictable manipulation of genetic material.
  • Combatting Antibiotic Resistance - Understanding the dependencies between genes can help identify the 'supporting cast' of genes that make antibiotic resistance possible, paving the way for targeted treatments.
  • Climate Change Mitigation - Insights from the study could inform the design of microorganisms engineered to capture carbon or degrade pollutants, thereby contributing to efforts to combat climate change.
  • Medical Applications - The predictability of gene interactions could revolutionise personalised medicine by providing new metrics for disease risk and treatment efficacy.

 The full study can be found here.

A groundbreaking study has found that evolution is not as unpredictable as previously thought, which could allow scientists to explore which genes could be useful to tackle real-world issues such as antibiotic resistance, disease and climate change.

The study, which is published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)challenges the long-standing belief about the unpredictability of evolution, and has found that the evolutionary trajectory of a genome may be influenced by its evolutionary history, rather than determined by numerous factors and historical accidents.

The study was led by Professor James McInerney and Dr. Alan Beavan from the School of Life Sciences at the University of Nottingham, and Dr. Maria Rosa Domingo-Sananes from Nottingham Trent University.

“The implications of this research are nothing short of revolutionary," said Professor McInerney, the lead author of the study. "By demonstrating that evolution is not as random as we once thought, we've opened the door to an array of possibilities in synthetic biology, medicine, and environmental science."

The team carried out an analysis of the pangenome - the complete set of genes within a given species, to answer a critical question of whether evolution is predictable or whether the evolutionary paths of genomes are dependent on their history and so not predictable today.

Using a machine learning approach known as Random Forest, along with a dataset of 2,500 complete genomes from a single bacterial species, the team carried out several hundred thousand hours of computer processing to address the question.

After feeding the data into their high-performance computer, the team first made "gene families" from each of the gene of each genome.

"In this way, we could compare like-with-like across the genomes", said Dr. Domingo-Sananes.

Once the families had been identified, the team analysed the pattern of how these families were present in some genomes and absent in others.

"We found that some gene families never turned up in a genome when a particular other gene family was already there, and on other occasions, some genes were very much dependent on a different gene family being present.”

In effect, the researchers discovered an invisible ecosystem where genes can cooperate or can be in conflict with one another.

"These interactions between genes make aspects of evolution somewhat predictable and furthermore, we now have a tool that allows us to make those predictions,” adds Dr. Domingo-Sananes.

Dr Beavan said: “From this work, we can begin to explore which genes "support" an antibiotic resistance gene, for example. Therefore, if we are trying to eliminate antibiotic resistance, we can target not just the focal gene, but we can also target its supporting genes.

“We can use this approach to synthesise new kinds of genetic constructs that could be used to develop new drugs or vaccines. Knowing what we now know has opened the door to a whole host of other discoveries.”

The implications of the research are far-reaching and could lead to –

  • Novel Genome Design – allowing scientists to design synthetic genomes, providing a roadmap for the predictable manipulation of genetic material.
  • Combatting Antibiotic Resistance - Understanding the dependencies between genes can help identify the 'supporting cast' of genes that make antibiotic resistance possible, paving the way for targeted treatments.
  • Climate Change Mitigation - Insights from the study could inform the design of microorganisms engineered to capture carbon or degrade pollutants, thereby contributing to efforts to combat climate change.
  • Medical Applications - The predictability of gene interactions could revolutionise personalised medicine by providing new metrics for disease risk and treatment efficacy.

 The full study can be found here.

 

Building on CO2


Carbon in concrete

Peer-Reviewed Publication

SWISS FEDERAL LABORATORIES FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (EMPA)

Researchers 

IMAGE: 

CONCRETE WITHOUT EMISSIONS: EMPA RESEARCHERS MATEUSZ WYRZYKOWSKI (RIGHT) AND NIKOLAJS TOROPOVS ARE REPLACING CONVENTIONAL AGGREGATES WITH PELLETS MADE FROM BIOCHAR, THUS EXPLORING THE POTENTIAL OF CO2-NEUTRAL OR EVEN NEGATIVE CONCRETE. PICTURE: EMPA

view more 

CREDIT: EMPA




To achieve the goal of a climate-neutral Switzerland by 2050, strategies and processes with a negative CO2 balance are necessary. These so-called negative emission technologies (NET) are intended to counterbalane the remaining "hard-to-avoid" emissions in 2050 and should help ensure that we eventually achieve net zero. As one of the main emitters, the construction sector has a particular obligation. Around eight percent of global greenhouse gas emissions are caused by cement production. At the same time, initial efforts are emerging to use the construction sector, with its massive consumption of resources, as a possible carbon sink. What sounds paradoxical will succeed if we start "building with CO2" – or rather, using carbon to produce building materials and thus removing it from the atmosphere in the long term. For such visions to become reality, a great deal of research is needed – such as is currently being done at Empa's Concrete & Asphalt lab. A team led by Pietro Lura is developing a process for integrating biochar into concrete.

Difficulties due to porosity

Biochar is produced by a pyrolytic carbonization process of biomass in the absence of oxygen and consists to a high extent of pure carbon – the carbon that the plants have extracted from the atmosphere in the form of CO2 as they grow. While CO2 is emitted when plants are burned, it remains bound in the biochar over the long term. The first concrete products with integrated biochar are already on the market. However, biochar is often introduced into the concrete untreated, which can lead to difficulties. "Biochar is very porous and therefore not only absorbs a lot of water, but also expensive admixtures used in concrete production," explains Empa researcher Mateusz Wyrzykowski. "Moreover, it is difficult to handle and not completely harmless either." The fine coal dust is problematic for the respiratory tract and carries a certain risk of explosion.

For these reasons, the researchers propose in a paper that has just published in the Journal of Cleaner Production processing the biochar into pellets. "Such lightweight aggregates already exist from other materials such as expanded clay or fly ash. The knowhow in handling these materials is available in industry, and this increases the chances that the concept will be put into practice," says Wyrzykowski.

Net zero at 20 percent share

To produce the pellets, the team used a concrete mixer with a rotating pan in which they mixed the biochar with water and cement and, as a result of the rotation, obtained small pellets with a diameter of between 4 and 32 millimeters. In turn, they used these pellets to produce normal concrete of strength classes C20/25 to C30/37 – the classes that are most widely used in civil engineering today. "With a proportion of 20 percent by volume of carbon pellets in the concrete, we achieve net zero emissions," says Mateusz Wyrzykowski. That is, the amount of carbon stored offsets all the emissions produced in the production of both the pellets and the concrete. While the limit has probably not yet been reached for normal concrete (density between 2,000 and 2,600 kg/m3) with 20 percent by volume, the negative emission potential is particularly striking for lightweight concrete (density approx. 1,800 kg/m3): An admixture of 45 percent by volume of carbon pellets in the concrete leads to total negative emissions of minus 290 kg CO2/m3. By comparison, conventional concrete emits around 200 kg CO2/m3.
 
Carbon from the atmosphere

For laboratory head Pietro Lura, research in his lab is a crucial contribution to achieving climate targets. He does not see biochar, which has served as a model material in current research, as the most important source of carbon. Rather, he draws attention to the broad concept "Mining the Atmosphere", which several labs at Empa are pursuing: the production of synthetic methane using solar energy, water and CO2 from the atmosphere in sunny regions of the world, and the subsequent pyrolysis of the synthetic gas. "This yields hydrogen, which can be used as an energy carrier in industry or mobility, and solid carbon, which we can process into pellets – like biochar – and incorporate into concrete," explains Lura.

20 percent by volume carbon pellets (black) result in net zero emissions. Photo: Empa

CREDIT

Empa


Aquaculture blessing in disguise for migratory waders fueling up in China



 NEWS RELEASE 

Reports and Proceedings

ROYAL NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR SEA RESEARCH

Hebo Peng is observing the birds 

IMAGE: 

HEBO PENG IS OBSERVING THE BIRDS. CREDITS: HANMING TU

view more 

CREDIT: HANMING TU





On the mudflats along the Chinese coasts where benign forms of aquaculture are practiced, shorebirds like knots and bar-tailed godwits are doing relatively well. That is shown in the dissertation that NIOZ PhD candidate and biologist He-Bo Peng will defend at the University of Groningen on January 15th. “The culturing of shellfish is by no means a way of nature conservation, but at least it keeps the mudflats in China and the bird food in a better condition than without this aquaculture”, Peng says.

Long term monitoring

Peng was the first to design a systematic survey of large parts of the intertidal mudflats along the 18.000 km of the Chinese coast. Between 2015 and 2023, he and his colleagues sampled 2,000 points on 40 different locations on a yearly basis, analyzing soil properties as well as living organisms that were found in the mud. The sampling was designed after the SIBES-program, that has been running as of 2008 on a grid with 5.000 locations in the Dutch Wadden Sea. “The work of Peng was one of the first that ‘exported’ our SIBES-design to international waters”, the scientific coordinator of this monitoring program, NIOZ biologist Allert Bijleveld says. “We are thrilled to see this long-term program copied to other important nature areas around the world.”

Shellfish culture

“My main finding was that the majority of the ‘bird food’ that we found in the mud was linked to the culturing of shellfish”, Peng says. “Overall, the number of waders like the great and the red knot are in decline along the Chinese coast, but at least on the locations where shellfish like Potamocorbula laevis were cultured in an extensive way, red knots as well as curlew sandpipers were doing relatively well. You can, therefore, say this aquaculture is a blessing in disguise for the migratory birds that depend on these ecosystems.”

Reclaiming land

The coast of the Yellow Sea has a long history of land reclamation for housing and industry. This reclaiming of land has stopped on most locations and there is even a modest increase in surface of mud flats on some parts. Peng: “On the locations where aquaculture has stopped as well, we see an almost unlimited exploitation of the mud flats by the local community. Therefore, the controlled management in aquaculture is a relatively good way to preserve at least some of the natural qualities of the intertidal flats.”

Listen to the mud

In his dissertation, Peng advices to ‘listen to the mud’. “This work is just a modest start of our understanding of these very important staging areas for birds on migration between eastern Siberia and Oceania. Through continuation of the long-term monitoring of the mud flats, as well as through tracking of birds with high tech transmitters, we can learn so much more in our quest for understanding of these ecosystems”, Peng says.

Daunting task

Professor in global flyway ecology Theunis Piersma stresses the importance of the work of his PhD-candidate. “Peng has shown that along the entire 18.000 km of the coastline, from the temperate climate in the north to the tropical parts in the south, biodiversity has homogenized under the influence of aquaculture. Given the intense use by local communities, returning these mudflats to true natural ecosystems will be a daunting task . But the incredible amount of work that Peng has done – and hopefully will continue to do – to monitor these ecosystems, will at least help us guide that process, should China chose to protect both the international travelling birds as well as the benthic biodiversity.”


Hebo Peng and his colleague are sampling on the intertidal mudflats in Fangchenggang, China. Credits: Hanming Tu


Volunteer is washing the samples. Credits: Hanming Tu

CREDIT

Hanming Tu

 

Holstering a Career: Wayne LaPierre Resigns from the NRA Executive


Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.  The now departed chief executive of the National Rifle Association of America (NRA) should know.  Wayne LaPierre’s time had come to resemble a dictatorship in a hurry, pinching the silver and stomping on the dissenters on its way out.  Allegations were already being made at the NRA’s annual meeting in Indianapolis in 2019, many barbed with the question as to where money from donors was actually going.

There were, for instance, LaPierre’s said suit purchases from the Zegna store in Beverly Hills between 2004 and 2017 amounting to a head shaking $274,695.03, for which Ackerman McQueen, the NRA’s former PR firm, was billed for.  The NRA also reimbursed LaPierre for gifts sent to the organisation’s vendors, donors and special recipients, far exceeding federal tax limits.

The NRA’s 2019 tax filing disclosed that the body’s executives (former and current) had received somewhere up to $1.4 million in violation of non-profit regulations.  The 2020 tax filing revealed a continuing trend.  That year, LaPierre received 1.7 million in compensation, including a $455,000 bonus.

Things have been messy at the world’s most famous gun lobby charity for some time.  The New York Attorney General Letitia James has busied herself with pursuing LaPierre and various top-placed individuals in the organisation on grounds of corruption.  A lawsuit stretching back to August 2020 seeking the NRA’s dissolution asserts that millions of dollars funded a whole slew of personal benefits, including private jet travel, exorbitantly priced meals and family trips to the Bahamas.  In doing so, it alleged that the NRA’s funds were mismanaged, a number of state and federal laws breached, including the body’s own bylaws and policies, and some $64 million lost over the course of three years.

With mulish determination, the NRA fought back, attempting, without success, to dismiss the complaint or change the court venue from Manhattan to more convivial surroundings in Albany.  Daringly, it even tried to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in a federal bankruptcy court in Texas, hoping to reconstitute the body in that state.  In May 2021, the court dismissed the claims, finding “that the NRA did not file the bankruptcy petition in good faith.”

In March 2022, LaPierre and the NRA Corporate Secretary and General Counsel John Frazer, ran the second act in trying to dismiss the lawsuit.  Inventively, arguments about constitutionality and jurisdiction were advanced.  Justice Joel Cohen of the New York County State Supreme Court was unimpressed, though accepted the NRA’s arguments against its dissolution by the Office of the Attorney General (OAG).  But in June 2022, Justice Cohen rejected claims by the organisation that “the Attorney General’s investigation was unconstitutionally retaliatory or selective.”  The AG’s investigation had been instigated following “reports of serious misconduct and it uncovered additional evidence that, at a bare minimum, undermines any suggestion that was a mere pretext to penalize the NRA for its constitutionally protected activities.”

Two further assaults on the AG’s case were mounted, one in September 2022, which found that James could appoint an independent monitor to oversee the NRA’s accounts as part of the lawsuit, and a last ditch effort in January this year, which was swatted by the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.  The trial date of January 8 was secure.

A few days before the trial’s opening, a $100,000 settlement between the OAG and Joshua Powell, the body’s former Executive Director of Operations and Chief of Staff, left James crowing.  “Joshua Powell’s admission of wrongdoing and Wayne LaPierre’s resignation confirm what we have alleged for years: the NRA and its senior leaders are financially corrupt.”

In the opening stages of the civil trial, Monica Connell, New York’s Assistant Attorney-General, explained to a six-member jury that, “The NRA allowed Wayne LaPierre and his group of insiders … to operate the NRA as ‘Wayne’s World’ for decades.”  (Connell could have surely done better than refer to the Mike Myers-Dana Carvey comedy dating from 1992.)

Connell went on to describe tyrant overlords turned kleptomaniacs.  “This case is about corruption in a charity.  It’s about breaches of trust, it’s about power.  People taking their hard-earned money and donate it to charities they believe in.  It doesn’t matter what the cause is.  They should be able to trust that the hard-earned money they donate is going to advance the mission of that charity.”

Where, when, for the NRA?  For decades, it has fetishised, moralised, and upheld the purest virtues of carrying heavy weaponry in civilian life.  To be sovereign is to be armed; any laws regulating the use of weapons best reserved for the military is an affront to the Second Amendment’s constitutional decency and the rugged principles of Frontier Man and Woman.  Massacres at nightclubs, schools and universities were simply the product of ill minds, not the ease with which one could get a weapon.  Better still, give everyone a weapon.  Even now, the departing LaPierre declares that “the NRA’s mission, programming, and fight for freedom have never been more secure.”

That said, financial probity and a good nose for accounts matter.  To that end, there is something richly fitting, if ironic, that economics and a concern about the use of finances should be the telling factor in the fall of numbers in the NRA.  Gun-control lobbies and regulators may scream themselves hoarse about stalled reforms, but they could have hardly hoped for better news than that reported by Stephen Gutowski in February last year.

At the time, LaPierre told attendees of the NRA’s most recent board meeting that the organisation had shrunk to 4.3 million numbers.  Such a membership still seems impressive, till you realise that the fall in numbers approximates to about one million subscribers since the tide of corruption began battering the organisation.  Between 2021 and 2022, revenue fell by almost $24 million, or 11 percent.  But expenses ballooned by 5.5 percent, or $11.5 million.

The carefully chosen, if typically anodyne words in a presentation prepared for the group’s finance committee in January 2023 noted that “Membership/Contribution performance has continued to experience softness through 2022.”  James, through her office, is ensuring the experience is also going to be a hard one.


Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne. Email: bkampmark@gmail.com. Read other articles by Binoy.
Fascinating study reveals how Trump’s moral rhetoric diverges from common Republican language

2024/01/08
(

In a recent study published in PNAS Nexus, researchers uncovered a stark divide in the moral language used by U.S. political candidates during the 2016 and 2020 presidential primaries. The findings also shed light on a notable divergence in Donald Trump’s use of fairness language in 2016 compared to typical Republican rhetoric, setting him apart from other candidates in his party.

Historically, effective use of moral language – focusing on notions of right and wrong – has been a powerful tool in political persuasion and advocacy, as observed by Aristotle. In recent political eras, characterized by heightened moral and emotional discourse, this form of rhetoric has become increasingly prevalent.

However, there remained a significant gap in understanding precisely how this moral rhetoric shapes the electoral landscape. The researchers were particularly interested in whether the use of different moral values in rhetoric by opposing political candidates entrenched voters in their existing views, thereby exacerbating political polarization, a key concern in contemporary politics.

To explore these questions, the researchers conducted a comprehensive analysis of tweets published by presidential candidates during the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential primaries. This period was chosen for its rich and diverse political discourse, providing ample data for analysis.

The study involved collecting 139,412 tweets from 39 campaigns, including 24 Democratic and 15 Republican, through Twitter’s Academic application programming interfaces, a platform for querying Twitter data. The researchers focused on candidates who participated in at least two official primary debates, ensuring that the rhetoric analyzed was from significant political figures.

The tweets were cleaned of any non-textual elements like emojis and hashtags, and standard language processing techniques were applied to them. The researchers used a tool called the Moral Foundations Dictionary (MFD) 2.0 to identify and categorize moral language. This dictionary categorizes words into five moral foundations: care, fairness, loyalty, authority, and sanctity. It helped in quantifying the use of moral language by different candidates.

Using this dictionary, the team constructed two types of networks. One network connected candidates by the mutual use of moral words, while the other compared the similarity in moral language use between candidates. These analyses allowed the researchers to map out how candidates’ moral word choices positioned them in the rhetorical landscape of their political community.

“To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to combine natural language processing and network analysis to map the dynamics of moral rhetoric in online discourse,” the researchers wrote.

There was a clear divergence in the moral language used by Democratic and Republican candidates. Democrats tended to focus more on language related to care and fairness, while Republicans leaned more towards loyalty, authority, and sanctity. This trend was consistent across both election cycles, suggesting entrenched moral-rhetorical norms within each party.

Additionally, within each party, candidates used their favored moral foundations in highly similar ways, indicating a strong sense of unity in moral rhetoric. For example, Democratic candidates consistently used similar language when talking about care and fairness, a pattern also observed among Republicans with loyalty and authority.

In a key discovery, the researchers also identified instances where candidates deviated from their party’s typical moral rhetoric and used language more commonly associated with the opposing party. For example, Donald Trump during the 2016 Republican primary used a significantly larger amount of fairness language compared to other Republican candidates. This was an unusual strategy within the Republican field.

However, Trump’s use of fairness language did not align him closer to Democratic candidates, who typically emphasize this moral foundation. Instead, it seemed to create a unique rhetorical space for him. He deviated from both Republican and Democratic norms by using fairness language in a way that was distinct to his campaign, setting him apart within the political discourse. For example, while Trump employed fairness language such as “biased,” “dishonest,” and “unfair,” Democrats employed fairness language such as “rights,” “justice,” and “equality.”

“Donald Trump’s status as a political outsider in 2016 corresponded with meaningful differences in his moral-rhetorical style vis-à-vis other candidates, making him a moral-rhetorical outsider as well. His unique use of negatively valanced fairness language pushed him far to the periphery of moral-rhetorical space, away from his own party and the opposition,” the researchers wrote.

Additionally, the study highlighted the strategic use of moral language. For example, Democrats Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg managed to use language associated with Republican values while maintaining central positions in the Democratic rhetorical network. This was achieved by balancing their use of these moral foundations with typical Democratic moral language.

For instance, Biden’s framing of the 2020 election as a “battle for the soul of the nation” invoked the sanctity foundation, while still resonating with Democratic values. Similarly, Buttigieg’s emphasis on creating a sense of “belonging” tapped into the loyalty foundation in a manner that was still palatable to Democratic voters. This nuanced use of moral language allowed them to maintain central positions within the Democratic rhetorical space.

The study, “Mapping moral language on US presidential primary campaigns reveals rhetorical networks of political division and unity“, was authored by Kobi Hackenburg, William J. Brady, and Manos Tsakiris.

© PsyPost