Tuesday, June 03, 2025

Freshwater fish in US carry introduced human-infecting parasites



Fish species frequently caught and eaten by people were found carrying large numbers of invasive parasitic worms





University of California - San Diego

Bluegill fish 

image: 

This bluegill collected during the study contained 16,973 H. pumilio and 8 C. formosanus infectious trematode parasite larval stages. 

view more 

Credit: Photo: Emma Palmer




More than 90% of popular freshwater game fish in Southern California contained an introduced parasite capable of infecting humans, according to a new study from researchers at UC San Diego’s Scripps Institution of Oceanography. 

The parasites found in the study — two species of flatworms called trematodes — typically cause gastrointestinal problems, weight loss or lethargy when they infect humans. In some rare and severe cases, the parasites have caused strokes or heart attacks. The findings, published June 3 in the Journal of Infectious Diseases and funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), suggest that these parasites pose a previously unrecognized public health risk in the United States. 

“Americans don’t usually think about parasites when they eat freshwater fish because it hasn’t historically been an issue here,” said Ryan Hechinger, an ecologist and parasitologist at Scripps and the study’s senior author. “But these trematodes have now been widely introduced in the U.S. and that means that doctors and the public should be aware.” 

Hechinger emphasized that there is “no need to panic” as the risks posed by these parasites are easy to mitigate: Fully cooking fish or freezing any intended to be eaten raw for at least one week should kill the trematodes, per Food and Drug Administration guidelines. But a social media survey included in the study suggested that people in the U.S. are likely consuming freshwater fish without taking these precautions, which can dramatically increase the odds of infection. 

The study identified two species of parasitic trematodes — Haplorchis pumilio and Centrocestus formosanus. These trematodes have historically infected people in Southeast Asia and likely arrived in the U.S. more than a decade ago inside the bodies of one of their hosts: an invasive aquatic snail commonly known as the red-rimmed melania or Malaysian trumpet snail (Melanoides tuberculata). The invasive snail has spread to 17 American states and Puerto Rico.

The trematode’s life cycle involves parasitizing three hosts: first a red-rimmed melania snail, then a fish and then, finally, a warm-blooded vertebrate, like a bird or a human, that consumes the infected fish. 

Previous work led by Hechinger showed that the red-rimmed melania and its associated trematode parasites are widespread in California. In the present study, Hechinger said he and his co-authors wanted to determine whether fish that Americans commonly catch and eat carry these infectious parasites, and whether people are consuming these fish in ways that increase their odds of infection.

In 2023, the researchers examined 84 fish from seven different species, including largemouth bass and bluegill, collected from five popular fishing locations in San Diego County. The researchers found that 93% of all the fish in the study were infected with the Haplorchis pumilio parasite, with some individual fish harboring thousands of the parasites. The second parasite, Centrocestus formosanus, was found at two of the five locations where it occurred in 91% of the fish. 

“These parasites are here in the U.S., and they’re infecting fish that people are eating,” said Hechinger. “We hope this study can help make public health officials, doctors and the public more aware.”

Additionally, the study authors conducted a survey of 125 YouTube videos with a total of nearly 5 million views, and found 65% did not mention the proper cooking or freezing of the fish, which promotes the transmission of the parasites.  

“Nearly 5 million views shows there is widespread interest and possibly a widespread practice of folks eating freshwater fish raw,” said Emma Palmer, a marine scientist at the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center who conducted the study during her graduate studies at Scripps. 

Properly cooking or freezing fish before consumption kills the parasites, and minor infections shouldn’t cause serious harm. Greater health risks come from chronic, repeated infection over many months or years. The researchers emphasize that public education about the risk of infection and proper fish preparation is crucial, particularly among people who may rely on freshwater fish for food.

The study authors plan to share their results with public health officials in several Southern California counties to increase awareness. The researchers also hope the study will reach medical practitioners, who might not think of these trematodes as a possible cause of gastrointestinal complaints or other problems in their patients. 

“There haven’t been any reported cases of these parasites infecting Americans,” said Hechinger, “but nobody is looking for cases and doctors aren’t required to report them.”

To facilitate more accurate tracking, the study authors recommend that fish-borne trematode infection be added to the list of diseases doctors are required to report to public health officials.

“This kind of research is so important to identifying new public health threats, and it wouldn’t have been possible without NIH funding,” said Hechinger. “This is research a private company would never fund because it won’t make anyone rich, but might make the general public a little healthier. If the federal government doesn’t fund this sort of study, who will?”

In addition to Hechinger and Palmer, the study was co-authored by Daniel Metz of the University of Nebraska.

 

Study resolves diatom tree of life, could offer clues to Earth's puzzle



Research finds diatoms evolved slowly for 100 million years and then experienced an evolutionary burst of speciation 170 million years ago.




University of Arkansas

Andrew Alverson 

image: 

Andrew Alverson

view more 

Credit: University Relations





Trees get most of the love, but diatoms, a group of photosynthetic microalgae, produce 20% of Earth’s oxygen and are the foundation of aquatic food webs. The prevalence and diversity of diatoms have made them highly successful, suggesting the evolutionary history of diatoms is worth understanding as an important piece of the larger puzzle of life on Earth.

A new NSF-funded study led by researchers from the U of A found that diatoms evolved slowly for the first 100 million years of their existence. Then, 170 million years ago, they reached an inflection point characterized by a burst of rapid speciation orders of magnitude faster than anything that had preceded it. This included changes to their shape, size and mode of reproduction, as well as repeated movements from oceans into freshwater systems, a typically difficult barrier for aquatic species to cross.

With an estimated 100,000 species, diatoms are now one of the most diverse groups of microalgae. They are small enough that dozens could fit on the head of a pin and are found almost anywhere there is water and sunlight (and still no one is accused of being a microalgae hugger).

The paper, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, was led by first author Andrew Alverson, a professor of biological sciences at the U of A. The paper represents nearly a decade of intense analysis overseen by Alverson. Eight of the paper’s 15 authors are or were affiliated with the U of A at the time research was conducted.

The bulk of the time was spent combining fossil information about diatoms with the newly sequenced transcriptomes (the genes expressed by an organism) from 181 different diatoms to reconstruct the pattern, timing and genomic context of major evolutionary transitions. In all, the team sequenced thousands of genes to reconstruct the family genealogy of diatoms, which has not been done at this scale before.

Alverson noted that one characteristic of this evolutionary burst was, evolutionarily speaking, a sudden increase in genetic duplication, the equivalent of getting not one set of chromosomes from each parent, as humans do, but two sets.

“Genome duplications have been associated with these kinds of diversification events,” Alverson explained. “It creates lots of fodder for evolution because now you've duplicated all the genetic material. In other groups, like flowering plants, their history is peppered with these genome duplication events that are associated with bursts of diversity.”

Gaining an understanding of how diatoms evolved also helps fill in the picture of how other biological processes on Earth evolved.

“Now that we know the timescale of diatom evolution,” Alverson explained, “we can superimpose a lot of things on that, and one of those things is ocean history. There’s a lot of data about how the ocean has changed over millennia, and diatoms are major players in ocean ecology and the biogeochemistry of nitrogen, silicon and phosphorus cycling.

“Now we can take what we know about changes in the ocean and overlay this history of diatoms, we can start to make correlations when silicon, which is 25% of the Earth's crust, started to drop precipitously in the oceans as diatoms increased. Simultaneously, we see atmospheric oxygen levels going up, so you can start to overlay this timeline on Earth and ocean history and draw some inferences about how diatoms are involved.”

Now that they’ve identified this inflection point, a clear break from the past, the next mystery to answer is: why? What happened to prompt this evolutionary burst of activity? Were there atmospheric or environmental changes? Did other organisms die off, vacating a niche for diatoms to inhabit?

Alverson has some guesses, but no certain answers. The world may be short of micro-algae huggers, but Alverson will continue to make the case for better understanding the evolution of diatoms.

 

Scientists propose new approach for classifying processed foods



New system aims to classify processed food based on health impact of ingredients




American Society for Nutrition





Recent years have seen growing scrutiny and debate around processed foods, but researchers have struggled to pin down what aspects of food processing are most relevant to health. Now, scientists have developed a system for classifying processed foods based on information about the health impacts associated with particular ingredients.

 

The new approach was developed by WISEcode, creator of an app that provides consumers with information about the food ingredients found in packaged goods.

 

“WISEcode’s approach is more nuanced and objective than previous classification systems, achieved by providing a more specific and actionable framework for evaluating processed foods,” said Richard Black, PhD, chief scientific officer at WISEcode and adjunct professor at the Tufts University School of Nutrition Science and Policy. “For consumers, it can provide a clear method for assessing processed foods and selecting healthier options, even within heavily processed food categories. For manufacturers, this allows easy comparison of your food products with your competitors, based on ingredients used and potential health impact of those ingredients.”

 

Black will present the work at NUTRITION 2025, the flagship annual meeting of the American Society for Nutrition held May 31–June 3 in Orlando, Florida.

 

The most common classification system used in nutrition research is known as Nova, which was developed in 2009 and groups foods into four categories ranging from unprocessed or minimally processed to ultra-processed. Ultra-processed foods have been linked with increased risk of obesity, heart disease and other chronic health conditions, but researchers say the broad definition of “ultra-processed”—which, for example, places a candy bar in the same category as fortified sugar-free whole grain breakfast cereal—makes it difficult to gauge the health impacts of specific food products.

 

“While Nova has played an important role in raising awareness about food processing, its one-size-fits-all approach doesn’t seem to reflect the complexity of modern food formulations or the diversity of their health impacts,” said Black. “We believe that there is most certainly a group of processed foods that may have a negative health impact over the long term, while there are other processed foods (which Nova would still classify as ultra-processed) that could contribute to a healthy diet.”

 

To provide a more granular way to differentiate among food products, WISEcode researchers developed a scoring system with three key components: an assessment of ingredients weighted based on current scientific understanding of the associated health risks, the percentage of calories that come from added sugars, and considerations for ingredients with known health concerns.

 

Black and colleagues applied this system to a database of over 650,000 foods and over 5,500 food ingredients and compared the results with the same foods classified according to the Nova system. The results show that the WISEcode system provides far more differentiation among foods that are classified as ultra-processed under Nova, though less differentiation among less-processed foods.

 

Based on WISEcode scores, food processing is classified as minimal, light, moderate, ultra or super-ultra. Foods overall and foods classified as ultra-processed under Nova were approximately evenly distributed across these categories, with 16-23% of foods falling into each grouping.

 

Black emphasized that the approach represents ongoing progress rather than a final conclusion, in keeping with WISEcode’s commitment to scientific credibility and transparency. “Our system is designed to evolve with scientific knowledge,” he explained. “As researchers discover more about specific ingredients and processing methods, we'll continuously update our assessments to ensure consumers always have access to the most current, evidence-based information. We believe in celebrating progress in nutritional science while maintaining rigorous standards.”

 

In addition to being useful for consumers, food producers and retailers, Black added that WISEcode can be a powerful research tool, making it possible to study the occurrence of individual ingredients and combinations of ingredients in new ways in order to determine which ones are linked with health risk, and which are not.

 

Black will present this research at 10:24-10:36 a.m. EDT on Tuesday, June 3, during the Food Science and Nutrition session at the Orange County Convention Center (abstract; presentation details).

 

Please note that abstracts presented at NUTRITION 2025 were evaluated and selected by a committee of experts but have not generally undergone the same peer review process required for publication in a scientific journal. As such, the findings presented should be considered preliminary until a peer-reviewed publication is available.

 

About NUTRITION 2025

NUTRITION 2025 is the flagship meeting of the American Society for Nutrition and the premier educational event for nutritional professionals around the globe. NUTRITION brings together lab scientists, practicing clinicians, population health researchers, and community intervention investigators to identify solutions to today’s greatest nutrition challenges. Our audience also includes rising leaders in the field – undergraduate, graduate, and medical students. NUTRITION 2025 will be held May 31–June 3, 2025 in Orlando, Florida. https://nutrition.org/meeting #Nutrition2025

 

About the American Society for Nutrition (ASN)

ASN is the preeminent professional organization for nutrition research scientists and clinicians around the world. Founded in 1928, the society brings together the top nutrition researchers, medical practitioners, policy makers and industry leaders to advance our knowledge and application of nutrition. ASN publishes four peer-reviewed journals and provides education and professional development opportunities to advance nutrition research, practice, and education. Since 2018, the American Society for Nutrition has presented NUTRITION, the leading global annual meeting for nutrition professionals. http://www.nutrition.org

 

Find more news briefs from NUTRITION 2025 at: https://www.eurekalert.org/newsroom/nutrition2025.  

 

###


Severe maternal morbidity by race and ethnicity and birth mode




JAMA Network Open



About The Study: 

In this cross-sectional study of births among individuals with a prior cesarean birth, patterns of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) by birth mode varied by race and ethnicity, with elevated rates of SMM among those from marginalized racial and ethnic groups with planned cesarean births. Future work should identify interventions to improve quality of care and promote equity for this population.



Corresponding author: To contact the corresponding author, Laura B. Attanasio, Ph.D., email lattanasio@umass.edu.

To access the embargoed study: Visit our For The Media website at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/ 

(doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.13578)

Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

#  #  #

Embed this link to provide your readers free access to the full-text article

 http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.13578?utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_term=060325

About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is an online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. On weekdays, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.

PRISON NATION U$A

Individual- and area-level incarceration and mortality



JAMA Network Open



About The Study:

 In this cohort study of 3.26 million individuals in the U.S., results highlighted the dual burden of incarceration on health outcomes. Individuals who were incarcerated faced significantly higher risks of death, particularly from overdoses, and elevated county incarceration rates exacerbated individual-level mortality risks. These findings suggest the need for reforms in criminal justice and public health policies to address these elevated risks and their widespread implications.




Corresponding author: To contact the corresponding author, Utsha G. Khatri, M.D., M.S., email utsha.khatri@mountsinai.org.

To access the embargoed study: Visit our For The Media website at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

(doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.13537)

Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

#  #  #

Embed this link to provide your readers free access to the full-text article 

http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.13537?utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_term=060325

About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is an online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. On weekdays, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.


Report Details Global Deterioration of Workers' Rights—Including in US Under Trump

"Whether it's Donald Trump and Elon Musk in the U.S. or Javier Milei and Eduardo Eurnekian in Argentina, we see the same playbook," the report states.


Activists from the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions, the Democratic Citizens' Media Alliance, and labor organizations hold a joint press conference on migrant domestic care worker policies in front of Seoul City Hall in Seoul, South Korea, on February 27, 2025.

(Photo: Chris Jung/NurPhoto via Getty Images)



Eloise Goldsmith
Jun 02, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

A report released Monday by the International Trade Union Confederation, a global network of unions, states that workers' rights around the world are in "free fall"—including in the United States, where U.S. President Donald Trump has taken "a wrecking ball to the collective labour rights of workers."

The report, titled The 2025 ITUC Global Rights Index, details "a stark and worsening global crisis for workers and unions."


The index, which first began in 2014, is a review of workers' rights in law and in practice. It ranks countries along a criteria of nearly 100 indicators, such as whether there is a "general prohibition of the right to collective bargaining" or whether "killing or enforced disappearance of trade unionists" take place.


Depending on how many indicators they rack up, countries are ranked from 1-5+, based on their degree of respect for workers' rights. 5+ is the worst ranking a country can get. Each year, violations are recorded from April until March.

According to the index, in 2025, average country ratings deteriorated in three out of five global regions, with Europe and the Americas recording their worst scores since 2014.

The Americas earned a score of 3.68 and Europe notched 2.78, which is worse than the 1.84 score the continent received in 2014. That latter score constitutes the largest drop in any region of the world in the last decade, per the report.

"Governments have collaborated in decades of deregulation, neoliberalism, and neglect, leading to the collapse of workers' rights. This has disenfranchised millions and paved the way for extremism, authoritarianism, and the billionaire coup against democracy that now threatens democracy itself," said ITUC general secretary Luc Triangle in a statement published Monday.

"If this pace of decline continues, in ten years there will be no country left in the world with the highest rating for its respect for workers' rights," he continued. "This is a global scandal, but it is not unavoidable; it is a deliberate decision that can be reversed."

The report also states that 87% of countries violated the right to strike, 80% of countries violated the right to collective bargaining, and in 72% of countries, workers had zero or reduced access to justice, an increase from 65% the year prior.

"In the United States, the Donald Trump administration has taken a wrecking ball to the collective labor rights of workers and brought anti-union billionaires into the heart of policymaking," according to the report.

Triangle toldThe Guardian that the report covers the time period up to March 2025. The report references various attacks by the Trump administration on workers, such as efforts to drastically reduce personnel at the U.S. Department of Education and the firing of a member of the National Labor Relations Board, denying the agency a quorum.

Since then, the Trump administration has also cut staff at the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service and sought to strip the collective bargaining rights from hundreds of thousands of government employees via executive order.

"Whether it's Donald Trump and Elon Musk in the U.S. or Javier Milei and Eduardo Eurnekian in Argentina, we see the same playbook of unfairness and authoritarianism in action around the world," the report states.
'Start Over From Scratch': Nobel Laureate Economists Denounce GOP Budget Bill

"The House bill addresses none of the nation's key economic challenges usefully and exacerbates many of them."


A woman holds a sign expressing fear of cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, at an April 5, 2025 protest against the Trump administration in Riverside, California.
(Photo: David McNew/Getty Images)

Brett Wilkins
Jun 02, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

Half a dozen Nobel Prize-winning economists on Monday expressed their "grave concerns" about the sprawling budget reconciliation package passed last month by the Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives, warning that slashing an already frayed social safety net and exploding the record deficit in service of massive tax cuts for the wealthiest households will worsen the nation's economic woes.

"The most acute and immediate damage stemming from this bill would be felt by the millions of American families losing key safety net protections like Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits," Daron Acemoglu, Peter Diamond, Oliver Hart, Simon Johnson, Paul Krugman, and Joseph Stiglitz wrote in an open letter published by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), a progressive think tank in Washington, D.C.

"The Medicaid cuts constitute a sad step backward in the nation's commitment to providing access to healthcare for all," the economists continued. "Proponents of the House bill often claim that these Medicaid cuts can be achieved simply by imposing work reporting requirements on healthy, working-age adults. But healthy, working-age adults are by definition not heavy consumers of health spending, so achieving the budgeted Medicaid cuts will obviously harm others as well."



Addressing the bill's staggering impact on public debt, the letter asserts that "U.S. structural deficits are already too high, with real debt service payments approaching their historic highs in the past year."

"The House bill layers $3.8 trillion in additional tax cuts ($5.3 trillion if all provisions are made permanent) on top of these existing fiscal gaps—and these tax cuts are overwhelmingly tilted toward the highest-income households," the Nobel laureates noted. "Even with the safety net cuts, the House bill leads to public debt rising by over $3 trillion in coming years (and over $5 trillion over the next decade if provisions are made permanent rather than phasing out). The higher debt and deficits will put noticeable upward pressure on both inflation and interest rates in coming years."

"The combination of cuts to key safety net programs like Medicaid and SNAP and tax cuts disproportionately benefiting higher-income households means that the House budget constitutes an extremely large upward redistribution of income," the economists warned. "Given how much this bill adds to the U.S. debt, it is shocking that it still imposes absolute losses on the bottom 40% of U.S households."

"The United States has a number of pressing economic challenges to address, many of which require a greater level of state capacity to navigate—capacity that will be eroded by large tax cuts," the letter concludes. "The House bill addresses none of the nation's key economic challenges usefully and exacerbates many of them. The Senate should refuse to pass this bill and start over from scratch on the budget."

The so-called Big Beautiful Bill is now in the Senate, where Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has vowed on behalf of Democrats to "fight it with everything we've got."

"The Republican plan is simple: Sell out working and middle-class families to pay off the rich and well-connected," Schumer said in a "dear colleague" letter on Sunday. "The bill would raise costs and taxes by an average of more than $800 for 40% of American families. Twenty million Americans would see their healthcare costs skyrocket, while almost 14 million would lose their health insurance all together, including millions of children and seniors."

Furthermore, Schumer noted that "11 million people, including 4 million children, could lose access to safe and affordable food, while every one of the 40 million Americans receiving federal food assistance would get less support every month. All the while, their radical plan would see double-digit energy cost increases for American households and businesses, and threaten close to 800,000 good-paying jobs in the clean-energy economy."

"Their entire agenda," Schumer said of Republicans, "can be boiled down to this: Billionaires win and families lose."