Tuesday, September 23, 2025

 

Neural basis of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder found in brain organoids 



Using machine learning, Johns Hopkins researchers identified healthy and unhealthy patterns




Johns Hopkins University






Pea-sized brains grown in a lab have for the first time revealed the unique way neurons might misfire due to schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, psychiatric ailments that affect millions of people worldwide but are difficult to diagnose because of the lack of understanding of their molecular basis.  

The findings may eventually help doctors reduce human error when addressing those and other mental health disorders that currently can only be diagnosed with clinical judgement and treated with trial-and-error medication approaches.  

Details about the insights appear today in APL Bioengineering.  

“Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are very hard to diagnose because no particular part of the brain goes off. No specific enzymes are going off like in Parkinson’s, another neurological disease where doctors can diagnose and treat based on dopamine levels even though it still doesn’t have a proper cure,” said Annie Kathuria, a Johns Hopkins University biomedical engineer who led the research. “Our hope is that in the future we can not only confirm a patient is schizophrenic or bipolar from brain organoids, but that we can also start testing drugs on the organoids to find out what drug concentrations might help them get to a healthy state.”  

Kathuria’s team engineered the organoids—simplified versions of a real organ—by converting blood and skin cells from schizophrenic, bipolar, and healthy patients into stem cells with the ability to produce various types of organ-like tissue. Using new machine learning algorithms that classify the electric activity of the mini-brain’s cells, they identified neural firing patterns associated with healthy and unhealthy conditions. In real brains, neurons communicate with one another by firing tiny electrical impulses.  

Distinct features of the organoids’ brain-like activity served as biomarkers of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, helping the team spot which organoids came from patients with those conditions with an accuracy of 83%. That number improved to 92% after the brain-like tissue received subtle electric shocks meant to reveal more of the neuroelectric impulses normally needed for brain activity.  

The newly discovered patterns involved intricate electrophysiological behavior unique for schizophrenic and bipolar patients, neural firing spikes and alterations at different intervals happening simultaneously across different parameters that created a distinct signature for both mental health disorders. 

“At least molecularly, we can check what goes wrong when we are making these brains in a dish and distinguish between organoids from a healthy person, a schizophrenia patient, or a bipolar patient based on these electrophysiology signatures,” Kathuria said. “We track the electrical signals produced by neurons during development, comparing them to organoids from patients without these mental health disorders.” 

To study how the organoids’ cells formed neural networks with one another, they placed them on a microchip fitted with multi-electrode arrays resembling an electrical grid. The set up helped them streamline data as if it came from a tiny electroencephalogram, or EEG, which doctors use to measure patients’ brain activity. 

Fully grown with about three-millimeter diameters, the organoids pack various kinds of neural cell types found in the brain’s prefrontal cortex, which is known for its higher cognitive functions. They also contain myelin, cellular material that wraps around nerves like insulation around electrical wires to improve networking of the signals needed by the brain to communicate with the rest of the body.  

The research only involved 12 patients, but the findings will likely have real-world, clinical application, Kathuria said, as they could be the beginning of an important testbed for psychiatric drug therapies.  

The team is currently working with neurosurgeons, psychiatrists, and other neuroscientists at the John Hopkins School of Medicine to recruit blood samples from psychiatric patients and test how various drug concentrations might influence their findings. Even with a small sample, the team could start suggesting drug concentrations that might work on a patient if they can normalize the organoid’s conditions, Kathuria said.  

“That’s how most doctors give patients these drugs, with a trial-and-error method that may take six or seven months to finds the right drug,” Kathuria said. “Clozapine is the most common drug prescribed for schizophrenia, but about 40% of patients are resistant to it. With our organoids, maybe we won’t have to do that trial-and-error period. Maybe we can give them the right drug sooner than that.” 

 

How the brain responds to bullying



First-person videos of bullying trigger distressful alarm states in viewers, which may be hazardous for mental and bodily health.




Society for Neuroscience




In a collaboration between Turun yliopisto and the University of Turku, researchers led by Birgitta Paranko and Lauri Nummenmaa explored the immediate effects of bullying on the brain. 

As reported in their JNeurosci paper, the researchers measured neural and attentional responses while tweens (aged 11 to 14) and adults watched first-person videos of either people being bullied or more positive social interactions. For participants of all ages, bullying triggered distressful alarm states, activating social and emotional brain networks as well as autonomic threat response systems. Measuring eye-tracking responses and pupil sizes in a separate group of adults during video viewing supported these findings, showing stronger emotional and attentional responses to bullying than other social interactions. The researchers also discovered that these neural responses and alarm states were linked to viewers having previous real-life experiences being victims of bullying. 

In sum, says Nummenmaa, “We mapped distress pathways in the brain that may be promptly engaged when someone gets bullied, and showed that the continuous alarm state is hazardous for both mental and somatic health due to the increased autonomic activation.”  

### 

Please contact media@sfn.org for full-text PDF. 

About JNeurosci 

JNeurosci was launched in 1981 as a means to communicate the findings of the highest quality neuroscience research to the growing field. Today, the journal remains committed to publishing cutting-edge neuroscience that will have an immediate and lasting scientific impact, while responding to authors' changing publishing needs, representing breadth of the field and diversity in authorship. 

About The Society for Neuroscience 

The Society for Neuroscience is the world's largest organization of scientists and physicians devoted to understanding the brain and nervous system. The nonprofit organization, founded in 1969, now has nearly 35,000 members in more than 95 countries. 

 

Study highlights the benefits of biodiversity for commercial fisheries


Combining 17 years of Chesapeake Bay population assessments with economic analyses, researchers show the importance of diversifying catches across species.



Virginia Institute of Marine Science

R/V Virginia 

image: 

An aerial view of the R/V Virginia, the lead vessel for the Chesapeake Bay Multispecies Monitoring and Assessment Program. Photo by Matthew Farnham

view more 

Credit: Matthew Farnham






A new study published in Ecological Applications demonstrates that commercial fisheries function much like an investment portfolio: diversity brings stability. The research shows that when different fish species in the Chesapeake Bay peak at different times, a dynamic known as “asynchrony,” the overall fishery becomes more resilient and watermen are better protected from boom-and-bust cycles.

The research was led by former University of Virginia Ph.D. student and Virginia Sea Grant Fellow Sean Hardison and was based on data compiled by William & Mary’s Batten School of Coastal & Marine Sciences and VIMS’ Chesapeake Bay Multispecies Monitoring and Assessment Program (CHesMMAP) from 2002 to 2018, in addition to recorded values of commercial landings as documented by the Virginia Marine Resources Commission and Maryland Department of Natural Resources. The work brought together an interdisciplinary team of ecologists, economists and fisheries scientists from UVA, the Batten School & VIMS, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science and Canada’s Pacific Biological Station.

“The findings speak to how commercial fisheries benefit from natural fluctuations in the ecosystem, but also how these natural influences are mediated by factors like market prices and management practices,” said Hardison, who is now a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. “The concept is similar to finance strategies that mitigate risk through a diversified portfolio of investments.”

CHESMMAP monitors populations of juvenile-to-adult fishes from the head of Chesapeake bay at Poole's Island, Maryland, to the mouth of the Bay just outside the Chesapeake Bay Bridge Tunnel in Virginia. It is unique in that it tracks multiple fish species simultaneously, providing critical data that supports sustainable fisheries management and deepens understanding of the Bay’s interconnected ecosystem. The researchers were interested in understanding the impacts of seasonal asynchrony among the bay’s various commercially fished species on the quantity and economic value of fishers’ landings, as well as the effects of different management practices between the states. 

Different states, different dynamics

In Maryland, the commercial striped bass fishery is closed for part of the year to protect spawning stocks. That closure disrupted the natural asynchrony between fish populations and harvests, since striped bass dominate the commercial portfolio. While the closure encouraged watermen to target other species, which temporarily increased stability in landings, it did not stabilize revenue because the economic value of striped bass is far greater than other species in the fishery.

In Virginia, where no such closure exists, natural asynchrony initially provided a stabilizing effect. However, as the abundance of key species such as Atlantic croaker and spot declined between 2002 and 2018, harvests became less asynchronous and more volatile.

Hardison’s former mentor and study coauthor Max Castorani, an associate professor in the Department of Environmental Sciences at UVA, said the findings illustrate how relying too heavily on a few high-value species such as striped bass can make a fishery portfolio unstable.

“Biodiversity doesn’t just make ecosystems healthier, it makes them steadier over time,” Castorani said. “It spreads risk and acts like insurance when certain fish are in short supply.”

Christopher Patrick, an associate professor and ecologist at the Batten School & VIMS, added, “The most stable system would be one where you’ve got a lot of different species and they’re all equally valuable. When you get an asymmetric value distribution, it kind of falls apart. This is what happens in Maryland to some extent.”

One practical avenue for diversification highlighted in the study is the continuing development of a commercial fishery for invasive blue catfish in the Chesapeake Bay. While prices have historically been modest, the research suggests that even small price increases could spur significant additional harvest and market participation.

Broader significance

The study emphasizes the importance of viewing fisheries through both ecological and economic lenses. While biodiversity naturally contributes to stability, factors such as regulations, markets and fishing practices can amplify, or weaken, that benefit.

While the study focused on the Chesapeake Bay, the nation’s largest and most economically important estuary, its findings can be applied broadly to fisheries around the world. 

“Fisheries portfolios benefit from natural fluctuations in the ecosystem, but those benefits are mediated by management and human behavior” Hardison said. “Our research shows the ecological and economic benefits of biodiversity.” 

To read the study’s full manuscript, visit Ecological Applications


Lead author Sean Hardison

Credit

Sean Hardison

 

SwRI celebrates completion of high-speed propulsion engine research facility



Facility will demonstrate faster methods of producing high-speed propulsion systems


Business Announcement

Southwest Research Institute

CAMP Building Exterior 

image: 

Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) today celebrated the completion of the Center for Accelerating Materials and Processes (CAMP), a new facility that will support research and development for tomorrow’s high-speed aerospace engines.

view more 

Credit: Southwest Research Institute





SAN ANTONIO — September 22, 2025 —Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) today celebrated the completion of the Center for Accelerating Materials and Processes (CAMP), a new facility that will support research and development for tomorrow’s high-speed aerospace engines.

“The CAMP facility will strengthen our nation’s leadership in aerospace propulsion,” said Dr. Barron Bichon, Director of SwRI’s Materials Engineering Department. “It’s an investment in this country’s future competitiveness, helping lay the foundation for transformative aerospace technologies that will have a lasting impact on defense and global mobility.”

Global defense, air travel, delivery and transportation are among the market forces driving demand for high-speed engines. The new CAMP facility will focus on demonstrating faster, more efficient techniques for manufacturing high-speed propulsion systems.

CAMP is a two-story, 33,505 square-foot facility at SwRI’s headquarters in San Antonio, Texas. Construction began in 2024, supported by a $30 million investment from SwRI. SwRI will evaluate new materials and processes to produce high-speed engines in a considerably shorter amount of time than current production timelines.

“The Center for Accelerating Materials and Processes demonstrates SwRI’s dedication to leading-edge research that tackles some of the toughest technical problems of today,” said Dr. Ben Thacker, Vice President of SwRI’s Mechanical Engineering Division. “This facility opens the door to new possibilities in what we can create and accelerates how quickly critical propulsion solutions can be deployed.”

One of the CAMP facility’s first projects will involve procuring and installing manufacturing process test equipment. The grand opening event included tours of the new facility and remarks from United States Congressman Tony Gonzales.

For more information, visit https://www.swri.org/what-we-do/technical-divisions/mechanical-engineering.


21ST CENTURY ALCHEMY

Nanoparticles supercharge vinegar’s old-fashioned wound healing power




The University of Bergen
Vinegar and cobalt-containing nanoparticles - animation 

video: 

Vinegar and cobalt-containing nanoparticles - animation

view more 

Credit: QIMR Berghofer





Wounds that do not heal are often caused by bacterial infections and are particularly dangerous for the elderly and people with diabetes, cancer and other conditions.

Acetic acid (more commonly known as vinegar) has been used for centuries as a disinfectant, but it is only effective against a small number of bacteria, and it does not kill the most dangerous types.

New research led by researchers at University of Bergen in Norway, QIMR Berghofer and Flinders University in Australia has resulted in the ability to boost the natural bacterial killing qualities of vinegar by adding antimicrobial nanoparticles made from carbon and cobalt. The findings have been published in the international journal ACS Nano.

Molecular biologists Dr Adam Truskewycz and Professor Nils Halberg found these particles could kill several dangerous bacterial species, and their activity was enhanced when added to a weak vinegar solution.

As part of the study, Dr Truskewycz and Professor Halberg added cobalt-containing carbon quantum dot nanoparticles to weak acetic acid (vinegar) to create a potent antimicrobial treatment. They used this mixture against several pathogenic species, including the drug resistant Staphylococcus aureusEscherichia coli (E. coli) and Enterococcus faecalis

Dr Truskewycz said the acidic environment from the vinegar made bacterial cells swell and take up the nanoparticle treatment.

"Once exposed, the nanoparticles appear to attack dangerous bacteria from both inside the bacterial cell and also on its surface, causing them to burst. Importantly, this approach is non-toxic to human cells and was shown to remove bacterial infections from mice wounds without affecting healing," he said.

The anti-bacterial boost in vinegar found in the study could potentially be an important contribution towards the ongoing battle against the rising antimicrobial resistance levels worldwide, with an estimated 4.5 million deaths associated with a direct infectious disease.

Professor Halberg said this study showed how nanoparticles could be used to increase the effectiveness of traditional bacterial treatments.

“Combination treatments such as the ones highlighted in this study may help to curb antimicrobial resistance. Given this issue can kill up to 5 million people each year, it’s vital we look to find new ways of killing pathogens like viruses, bacteria and fungi or parasites,” he said.

Link to the study: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.5c03108

 

KU scholars outline 'death and rebirth of research in education in the age of AI'




Numerous issues have long limited effectiveness of education research, but new tech provides opportunity to rethink research, KU experts write




University of Kansas





LAWRENCE — Research in education is struggling, but the good news is it can be revived, according to University of Kansas scholars.

In a new article titled “The Death and Rebirth of Research in Education in the Age of AI: Problems and Promises,” three KU education researchers address the biggest challenges facing their field and why now is a good time to consider not only the possibilities that artificial intelligence presents, but how and why the next generation of researchers can produce scholarship that has more influence on the field of education.

“Research in education has some fundamental issues it needs to deal with, and AI has exacerbated that in some ways. We’ve been doing this for a long time, and we haven’t affected much or had the influence that we want to have or could have,” said Rick Ginsberg, dean of KU’s School of Education & Human Sciences and one of the article’s authors.

In the article, the authors identify and analyze seven key problems facing education research:

  1. Problems with peer review.
  2. Quantification without contextual representation is tyranny.
  3. The overblown research paradigm wars.
  4. Overgeneralizing across contexts.
  5. The negligence of individual diversity.
  6. The typical vs. possible mindset.
  7. The multiplicity and conflicting educational results.

In the case of problem No. 1, peer review is the standard model to ensure results are valid and based on sound science, but it leads to problems like reviewer burnout and delaying the editorial process so long that results are out of date before publication. The KU researchers also noted that scientists like Newton and Einstein published some of history’s most important work without peer review.

In another example, the authors point out how problem No. 4, overgeneralizing, has led to overreliance on randomized control trials and assumptions that findings from one study of a group of individual students or educators will be typically true for all. 

“Too often, research has prioritized what is typical and measurable over what is possible and meaningful,” the authors wrote of problem No. 6, leading to a lack of imagination in education research.

The article, written by Yong Zhao, Foundation Distinguished Professor of Education; Neal Kingston, University Distinguished Professor of Educational Psychology; and Ginsberg, all of KU’s School of Education & Human Sciences, was published in the journal ECNU Review of Education.

The authors write that while AI is not new, its recent improvements can present an opportunity at a time of stagnation in the field. While they noted it is not a replacement for researchers, it can allow for new ways of thinking, analyzing data and summarizing large bodies of data at a much faster than humans can. It also raises epistemological questions about what students should learn when machines can perform many cognitive tasks faster than people.

“It is inevitable that researchers come up against these challenges, and it’s important to understand them,” Kingston said. “People need to be guided to realize what is standing in the way of their research making a difference and improving things. AI is not a threat, and it’s also not a panacea. But it can potentially help us improve.”

Just as every individual is unique, every classroom is as well, and very few findings can be universalized to many or all educational settings. Given how that variability has held back success of research in some ways, the authors say instead of giving up on research, the time has come to reconsider how it can be transformed by rethinking educational aims, considering ethical, equitable and sociotechnical inquiry and thinking about issues such as distributed cognition, and how humans can use the technology to be co-learners with machines and democratize research by allowing students to be part of designing and guiding research.

That rethinking can be the foundation for a rebirth of educational research.

“We should treat AI as infrastructure, as another cognitive layer,” Zhao said. “This is all to rethink and capture new ways to do research, and I think a lot of it is stuck in the past paradigm. Like anything new, there are risks, but we can find the best way to make it work. We wanted to summarize and introduce new possibilities, and hopefully this article will help guide people doing educational research going forward to think of new possibilities.”