Thursday, November 20, 2025

‘More Horrific Than Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo’: The Unsalvageable Depravity of Israel’s Prisons for Palestinians

by  | Nov 20, 2025 |  ANTIWAR.COM

On June 19, 2024, Khaled Mahajneh, a Palestinian citizen of Israel, became the first lawyer to visit a notorious detention facility for Palestinians from the Gaza Strip, located inside the Sde Teiman military base in the Negev Desert, one of several detention facilities established after October 7, 2023 to hold Palestinians seized in Gaza.

Palestinian prisoners photographed at the notorious Sde Teiman detention facility in December 2023.

Speaking to +972 Magazine a week after his visit, Mahanjeh drew a pertinent comparison with the treatment of Muslim prisoners in the US’s post-9/11 “war on terror”, but concluded that Israel’s behavior was even worse.

“The situation there is more horrific than anything we’ve heard about Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo”, he said, adding, “I have been visiting political and security detainees and prisoners in Israeli jails for years, including since October 7. I know that the conditions of detention have become much harsher, and that the prisoners are abused on a daily basis. But Sde Teiman was unlike anything I’ve seen or heard before.”

Mahajneh “was initially approached by Al Araby TV, which was seeking information about Muhammad Arab”, also identified as Mohammed Saber Arab, “a reporter for the network who was arrested in March while covering the Israeli siege of Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City.”

Muhammad Arab, photographed in Gaza before his capture and his imprisonment in Sde Teiman.

Granted permission to visit, he found Muhammad Arab, 42, “nearly unrecognizable after 100 days in the detention facility; his face, hair, and skin color had changed, and he was covered with dirt and pigeon droppings.”

The journalist told him that the prisoners were “continually blindfolded and tied up with their hands behind their backs, forced to sleep hunched over on the floor without any bedding”, kept on starvation rations, and “prevented from talking to each other, even though more than 100 people are kept to a warehouse, some of them elderly and minors,” as Mahajneh told +972 Magazine. He added, “They are not allowed to pray or even read the Qur’an.”

Muhammad Arab also told Mahajneh that sexual abuse was widespread, stating that the Israeli guards “sexually assaulted six prisoners with a stick in front of the other detainees after they had violated prison orders.” Mahanjeh told +972 Magazine, “When he talked about rapes, I asked him, ‘Muhammad, you’re a journalist, are you sure about this?’ But he said he saw it with his own eyes, and that what he was telling me was only a small part of what was happening there.”

As +972 Magazine also noted, in a video circulating on social media, a Palestinian prisoner recently released from Sde Teiman “said that he had personally witnessed multiple rapes, and cases in which Israeli soldiers made dogs sexually assault prisoners.”

Muhammad Arab also stated that, in the month before the lawyer’s visit, as +972 Magazine described it, “several prisoners were killed during violent interrogations”, while others, “who had been wounded in Gaza”, were “forced to have their limbs amputated or bullets removed from their bodies without anesthesia, and were treated by nursing students.”

Like many dozens of journalists seized in Gaza, Muhammad Arab has not been freed, and his current whereabouts appear to be unknown.

While comparisons with Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo are relevant, the main similarity is with the CIA “black sites”

Khaled Mahajneh’s comments were not the first time that Guantánamo had been mentioned in connection with Sde Teiman. On March 10, 2024, Haaretz, which had learned of the existence of the facility in December 2023, published an editorial entitled, “No to the Israeli Guantánamo Bay”, after it learned that 27 prisoners from Gaza had “died while in custody in military facilities — at the Sde Teiman base, near Be’er Sheva; at the Anatot base, near Jerusalem; and during interrogation at other facilities.”

The comparisons with Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo were certainly relevant. After 9/11 in the US, and after October 7 in Israel, both governments, driven by a terrifying all-consuming vengeance, by a determination that everyone they seized was a “terrorist”, and by claims that they were seeking “actionable intelligence” to target everyone responsible, shredded all protections for prisoners, with complete contempt for all international and domestic laws and treaties that were supposed to guarantee fundamental baseline protections from torture, abuse and murder.

On February 7, 2002, George W. Bush issued a notorious memorandum, “Humane Treatment of Taliban and al Qaeda Detainees”, declaring that prisoners seized in the “war on terror” were not protected by the Geneva Conventions, paving the way for them to be regarded as “enemy combatants” without any fundamental rights whatsoever. Bush also explicitly ruled out the applicability of Common Article 3 of the Conventions, even though it prohibits, under all circumstances, “violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture.”

Just a month later, on March 4, 2002 — confirming, I believe, that the Bush administration and the Israeli government were in close communication at this time — the Israeli Knesset passed the Incarceration of Unlawful Combatants Law, which was “intended to regulate the incarceration of unlawful combatants not entitled to prisoner-of-war status, in a manner conforming with the obligations of the State of Israel under the provisions of international humanitarian law.”

Under the Israeli law, as was explained in a UN thematic report, “Detention in the context of the escalation of hostilities in Gaza (October 2023-June 2024)”, published on July 31, 2024, the Chief of the General Staff of the IDF is empowered to “order administrative detention of any person he considers an unlawful combatant for as ‘long as the hostile acts… against the State of Israel have not yet ceased’”, which, “in the context of an occupation and armed hostilities that has already continued for decades, can readily amount in effect to indefinite administrative detention.”

Crucially, while the original law allowed imprisonment without an incarceration order for four days, without judicial review for 14 days, and without the right to see a lawyer for 21 days, an amendment to the law in December 2023 increased the allowed amount of time prisoners could be held without an incarceration order to 45 days, increased the judicial review threshold to 75 days, and increased the time allowed without the right to see a lawyer to 180 days, later reduced to 90.

What this meant in reality was that a system of enforced disappearance was enshrined in Israeli law, in conjunction with a regime of arbitrary detention, both of which are flagrantly illegal under international humanitarian law.

On this basis, the actions of the Israeli state in “disappearing” Palestinians into incommunicado detention are most closely analogous to the US government’s program of CIA “black site” torture prisons, where those held, for up to four and a half years, from March 2002 until September 2006, were imprisoned as though they had vanished off the face of the earth.

This conclusion is also reinforced by the decision, taken in response to the October 7 attacks by Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israel’s far-right National Security Minister, who is in charge of all prison facilities, to prevent representatives of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) from visiting any prisoners anywhere in Israel’s entire sprawling prison system for Palestinians.

To understand quite how glaringly troubling this is, it is important to note that, after 9/11, the Bush administration allowed access to the ICRC to all of its prison facilities except the “black sites.”

Although torture and abuse was widespread at Guantánamo, at Abu Ghraib and other facilities in Iraq after the illegal US-led invasion in March 2003, and at facilities in Afghanistan, including Bagram, where the majority of the men and boys who ended up at Guantánamo were “processed” under vile conditions most closely resembling those at Sde Teiman, ICRC representatives were allowed access to almost all the prisoners, except for a handful who were hidden off the books, delivering hundreds of thousands of messages from prisoners to their families, even if their efforts to improve conditions in the prisons appeared to be negligible.

In other words, since October 7, Ben-Gvir has transformed Israel’s entire prison system for Palestinians into the equivalent of the CIA “black sites”, where, with no scrutiny whatsoever, and under a regime obsessed with vengeance, coercive interrogations, and the collective and presumptive “guilt” of everyone detained, the “black site” program, which officially involved 119 individuals, has expanded, in Israel’s hands, to become the most monstrous system of murderous torture and abuse ever supported by the west in defence of a supposed ally.

How the brutality of the Sde Teiman facility was exposed in the west

Stories of the horrors of Sde Teiman first emerged in the western media in May 2024, following a report by Physicians for Human Rights Israel (PHRI) in April. In detailed coverage based on testimony by whistleblowers, CNN painted a gruesome picture of a monstrously sadistic facility where prisoners were permanently blindfolded and prevented from speaking to one another, and where any perceived infringement was punished with extreme violence. In the prison’s hospital, as Muhammad Arab later confirmed, prisoners’ hands and feet were often amputated after they became infected through constant handcuffing, often with zip-ties, while others were “strapped to their beds, wearing diapers and fed through straws”, and sometimes operated on, without anaesthesia, by unqualified medics.

One of the whistleblowers, who worked as a medic in the hospital, said that the beatings “were not done to gather intelligence. They were done out of revenge,” as “punishment for what they [the Palestinians] did on October 7 and punishment for behavior in the camp.”

CNN also spoke to released prisoners, including Dr. Mohammed al-Ran, a Palestinian with Bosnian citizenship, who was the head of the surgical unit at the Indonesian Hospital in northern Gaza. Seized in December 2023, outside the Al-Ahli Baptist Hospital in Gaza City, where he had just started working after fleeing the north, he, like so many of the hundreds of men held at Sde Teiman, had been randomly abducted, “stripped down to his underwear, blindfolded and his wrists tied, then dumped in the back of a truck, where, he said, the near-naked detainees were piled on top of one another as they were shuttled” to Sde Teiman.

A group of Palestinians, randomly seized by Israeli forces in Beit Lahiya, in northern Gaza, stripped to their underwear on December 7, 2023, prior to being moved to prisons and detention centres, including Sde Teiman.

Amongst the abuse endured by al-Ran was what he called “the nightly torture”, when “the guards would unleash large dogs on sleeping detainees, lobbing a sound grenade at the enclosure as troops barged in” and beat them.

In early June 2024, just before Khaled Mahajneh’s visit to Muhammad Arab, the New York Times reported that “roughly 4,000 Gazan detainees had spent up to three months in limbo at Sde Teiman”, with around 70 percent subsequently “sent to purpose-built prisons for further investigation and prosecution.” While this sounds innocuous enough, conditions in these “purpose-built prisons” are even more disturbing, as can be seen in a harrowing video posted by Israel’s Channel 13 in February 2024.

The rest of those held at Sde Teiman, at least 1,200 people in total, “had been found to be civilians and returned to Gaza, without charge, apology or compensation”, according to the Times, which also reported that 35 prisoners had died at the facility.

Noticeably, however, while these statistics would seem to indicate that Israel had some reason for continuing to hold two-thirds of these prisoners, classified Israeli military intelligence made public in September this year indicated that, in fact, “Only one in four detainees from Gaza are identified as fighters”, as the Guardian reported, “with civilians making up the vast majority of Palestinians held without charge or trial.”

As the Guardian also explained, “Those jailed for long periods without charge or trial include medical workersteachers, civil servants, media workerswriters, sick and disabled people and children. Among the most egregious cases are those of an 82-year-old woman with Alzheimer’s jailed for six weeks and of a single mother separated from her young children. When the mother was released after 53 days she found the children begging on the streets.”

A serving soldier said that, Sde Teiman “at one point held so many sick, disabled and elderly Palestinians that they had their own hangar, dubbed ‘the geriatric pen.’”

Moreover, as the Guardian also noted, “Both rights groups and Israeli soldiers have described an even smaller ratio of fighters to civilians. When photos of Palestinians stripped and shackled [including, and as described by Dr. Mohammed al-Ran] caused international outrage in late 2023, senior officers told Haaretz newspaper that ’85 to 90 per cent’ were not Hamas members.”

The Sde Teiman rape scandal

While some of the reports mentioned above indicated that rape and other forms of sexual assault had taken place at Sde Teiman, it was not until the end of July 2024 that a truly sickening story emerged — when nine IDF soldiers, all reservists, were arrested “on suspicion of sodomizing [a] prisoner”, as Haaretz explained at the time.

A video of the brutal gang rape, of a male Palestinian prisoner, was leaked on August 8, 2024, and, although it didn’t explicitly show what the soldiers did to the prisoner, as it only showed them clustered around him, hiding their actions with their shields, Haaretz had already established that he “suffered from a ruptured bowel, a severe injury to his anus, lung damage and broken ribs”, and “was taken to a hospital for an operation.”

A screenshot from the leaked Sde Teiman rape video.

A doctor at Sde Teiman, Prof. Yoel Donchin, told Haaretz that, until he saw the man’s injuries, he “couldn’t believe an Israeli prison guard could do such a thing”, and he added, “If the state and Knesset members think there’s no limit to how much you can abuse prisoners, they should kill them themselves, like the Nazis did, or close the hospitals.” As he also explained, “If they maintain a hospital only for the sake of defending ourselves at [the International Criminal Court at] the Hague, that’s no good.”

The impact of the leaked Sde Teiman video — and the accompanying story — ought to have had the same seismic impact as the leaked photos of the abuse of prisoners by US soldiers in Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq in April 2004, when the world reeled in shock at the first photographic evidence of brutality of the US’s “war on terror.”

Unforgivably, however, although there was some global outrage over the Sde Teiman rape scandal, the world soon moved on. There was no massive backlash against Israel, and no calls for an end to its ongoing genocide, in which the widespread torture and abuse of Palestinian prisoners was — and still is — such an integral part.

The lessons of Abu Ghraib were largely forgotten — that, when you dehumanize an entire population, and dispense with notions that evidence is necessary, everyone becomes guilty, and, when there are no restraints of the activities of those working in these prisons, torture, abuse and even murder have a tendency to spread.

The depraved response to the rape scandal within Israel

The silence of the west was even more inexcusable given the response to the scandal within Israel itself. Even before the video surfaced, when news of the soldiers’ arrest was announced, far-right politicians and their supporters stormed the prison in support of the soldiers, and, later, the Beit Lid military base was also broken into by far-right activists after the nine soldiers had been moved there.

Netanyahu’s two far-right ministers, Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir, praised the soldiers as “heroic warriors” and “our best heroes”, while, in the Knesset, Likud member Hanoch Milwidsky argued that it was legitimate to rape Palestinian prisoners accused of being members of Hamas’ “Nukhba” force — the special forces unit within the Al-Qassam Brigades, Hamas’ military wing. “Everything is legitimate to do”, he said, “Everything.”

What makes all of the above even more shocking is that the man in question was a civilian. Never charged with a crime, he was one of the 1,718 Palestinian hostages freed as part of the ceasefire deal agreed on October 10, although his injuries were much worse than reported.

As the political analyst Muhammad Shehada noted in a post on X on November 3, his injuries were so severe that he “underwent 20 surgical operations, including colostomy and urostomy, and is still suffering medical complications.” Shehada added that Israel “likely released him so he wouldn’t be able to testify at court against his rapists who are still at large”, adding that he “is now fearful for his life; he could be killed in any Israeli strike to cover up this atrocity.”

Although Israel screams “Nukhba” about everyone if detains and abuses, its hysteria cannot disguise the fact that, more often than not, it has no evidence to justify its claims, which, instead, only reveal the sordid depths of its racist and exterminatory hatred of all Palestinians. Israel more than doubled its prison population after October 7, 2023, from around 5,000 to over 11,000, but the majority of those held are not suspected “Nukhba” at all, just civilians rounded up, mostly arbitrarily, in Gaza or the West Bank, as discussed above.

Even with the recent releases, including 250 prisoners serving long prison sentences, Addameer, the Prisoner Support and Human Rights Association, estimates that there are still over 9,100 Palestinian prisoners in Israeli prisons, including around 50 women and 400 children, and with around 3,500 of these prisoners held without charge or trial under “administrative detention.”

Based on secret evidence that neither they nor their lawyers can challenge, and which can be indefinitely renewed every six months, “administrative detention” is not only the bedrock of Israeli detention policy; it also influenced the US, which has operated a form of “administrative detention” at Guantánamo from 2004 until the present day, with most prisoners only ever freed through a series of administrative review processes.

No one knows how many “Unlawful Combatants” are still detained, although Addameer believes it is at least 1,200.

After the rape scandal broke, Israel sank to new levels of depravity as the soldiers, released on bail, grotesquely became media celebrities, even as further evidence of rapes in the facility emerged, via Ibrahim Salem, seen in one of the photos furtively snapped by one of the whistleblowers who spoke to CNN. Released after nearly eight months of imprisonment without charge or trial, Salem told Middle East Eye, “Most of the prisoners will come out with rectum injuries [caused by the sexual assault],” sometimes, he said, undertaken by female soldiers.

His testimony emerged as B’Tselem, the Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories, released a devastating report, “Welcome to Hell”, detailing the transformation, since October 7, 2023, of the entire Israeli prison system for Palestinians into “a network of torture camps.”

As B’Tselem stated in their report, which featured the testimonies of 55 released prisoners from a number of detention facilities, “The prisoners’ testimonies lay bare the outcomes of a rushed process in which more than a dozen Israeli prison facilities, both military and civilian, were converted into a network of camps dedicated to the abuse of inmates. Such spaces, in which every inmate is intentionally condemned to severe, relentless pain and suffering, operate as de facto torture camps.”

In October 2024, as I reported at the time in an article entitled, UN Report Condemns Unparalleled Violence, Including Torture, Rape and Murder, in Israel’s Unaccountable Prisons for Palestinians, the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel also weighed in, issuing a hugely significant report not only about Israel’s prisons for Palestinians, but also about its war on Gaza’s hospitals.

As the Commission stated, it had “documented more than 20 cases of sexual and gender-based violence against male and female detainees in more than 10 military and Israel Prison Service facilities, in particular in Negev prison and Sde Teiman camp for male detainees and in Damon and Hasharon prisons for female detainees.”

Israel’s ever-worsening depravity

Fast-forward to now, as Israel is seeking to redeem its reputation after a US-brokered ceasefire took effect on October 10 — even though it continues to kill Palestinians and to starve them, while occupying 58% of the Gaza Strip and continuing to demolish homes to make Gaza unliveable — all of which ought to establish that it has no reputation to redeem.

Shamefully, as the ceasefire began, biased western reporters sought to avoid seeing the emaciated and brutalized Palestinian prisoners and hostages released in exchange for the last surviving Israeli hostages. Reports from a Palestinian perspective were rare, although +972 Magazine and WSWS both managed to pierce the wilful media silence with harrowing reports from released prisoners.

Western media also largely averted their eyes as the bodies of dead Palestinians were returned in exchange for the bodies of dead Israeli hostages.

Under the terms of the ceasefire deal, Israel was obliged to return 15 Palestinian corpses in exchange for each dead Israeli hostage. On October 20, the Guardian reported that “At least 135 mutilated bodies of Palestinians returned by Israel to Gaza” had been held in Sde Teiman. The Guardian added that some of the photos of seen by its reporters “cannot be published due to their graphic nature”, as they “show several of the victims blindfolded, their hands tied behind their backs”, with one showing “a rope fastened around a man’s neck.”

Doctors at Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis said that official examinations and field observations “clearly indicate that Israel carried out acts of murder, summary executions and systematic torture against many of the Palestinians”, with health officials noting that the documented findings included “clear signs of direct gunfire at point-blank range and bodies crushed beneath Israeli tank tracks”.

On November 11, Dr. Muneer Alboursh, the Director General of the Gaza Health Ministry provided an update, stating in a post on X, “We have received 315 bodies so far, and only 89 of them have been identified through clothing or a wedding ring or simple markings. Yesterday, we received a pure body that had been mauled by trained predatory dogs, and the marks of the attack were clearly visible. Some bodies arrived without heads, some were crushed under military bulldozers, and some were found with their hands tied and eyes blindfolded, with close-range gunshot wounds to the head and chest. There is also clear evidence of organ theft through precise surgical incisions, with the heart, liver, kidneys, and corneas removed.”

He added, “We buried 182 bodies in a mass grave after taking samples as much as our limited resources allowed. We requested cooling facilities from the Red Cross, and they brought us refrigerators used for fish, which we were forced to use temporarily to preserve the dignity of the bodies and allow families time to identify them. International investigation committees must be activated to hold the occupation accountable, identify the unknown, and document these crimes in a legally recognized manner.”

While Dr. Alboursh is undoubtedly correct, Israel itself is unconcerned, digging itself further into uncharted depths of depravity through renewed public celebrations of the rapists, after revelations that it was the IDF’s own Advocate General, Yifat Tomer-Yerushalmi, who leaked the rape video.

Hounded from her post and subsequently arrested, Tomer-Yerushalmi said in her resignation letter that she had leaked the video “to defuse attacks on military investigators and prosecutors working on the case to enable it to go ahead”, as WSWS reported, adding that, “In no small part, this was an attempt to protect Israeli soldiers from international prosecution and leave punishment to Israel’s sympathetic judiciary.”

However, she is now a reviled figure, even though, throughout two years of genocide, she dutifully refused to investigate any other cases of alleged war crimes by the Israeli military. Nevertheless, she now faces charges of “fraud and breach of trust, abuse of office, obstruction of justice, and disclosure of official information by a public servant”, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu saying that “The incident in Sde Teiman caused immense damage to the image of the state of Israel and the IDF”, and calling it “perhaps the most severe public relations attack that the state of Israel has experienced since its establishment”, while the more unhinged defence minister Israel Katz said, “Anyone who falsely spreads blood libels against IDF soldiers and prefers the welfare of the Nukhba terrorists over theirs is not worthy of wearing the IDF uniform and belongs in prison.”

Ben-Gvir’s bill for the execution of Palestinian prisoners

As Israel’s moral collapse continues, with widespread calls for the trial of the celebrated rapists to be dropped, the last cause for profound concern about the country’s increasing derangement is a bill approving the execution of Palestinian prisoners, which recently passed its first reading in the Knesset.

The bill — a long-cherished dream of Itamar Ben-Gvir, who, before the vote, posted a video of himself with bound, prone Palestinian prisoners, gloating that “there is still something we have to do; the death penalty for terrorists” — stipulates that “any person who intentionally or recklessly causes the death of an Israeli citizen or a person residing in Israel, when motivated by racism, hatred, or intent to harm Israel or the Israeli people, shall be subject to the death penalty”, and, as the Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor explained, “further stipulates that the sentence of any person who receives a final death verdict may not be commuted.”

As the Geneva-based NGO added, “The most dangerous aspect of the bill lies in its application within a judicial system that lacks any guarantees of a fair trial for Palestinians. Confessions are extracted under duress, effective legal representation is unavailable, the presumption of innocence is disregarded, and there is no right to appeal or to access documents essential for the defence.”

The conviction rate in Israel’s military courts for Palestinians is a staggeringly unbelievable 99.74%, and, to renew the analogy with the “war on terror”, it is difficult to imagine the grotesque miscarriages of justice that would have occurred in the US if former Vice President Dick Cheney had prevailed in his attempts to swiftly try and execute alleged terrorists, using evidence explicitly derived through the use of torture, in the military commissions that he established at Guantánamo in November 2001.

In the US, the Supreme Court, in 2006, eventually ruled that, essentially, torture was incompatible with justice, forcefully reminding the Bush administration that Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions applies to all prisoners, without any exceptions allowed, and striking down the military commissions as illegal and unconstitutional. They were subsequently revived, but have, ever since, been mired in the unresolvable effort to successfully prosecute anyone who has been subjected to the use of torture.

Will the west ever recognize how unforgivably one-sided it is with regard to Israel and the Palestinians?

As further evidence of Israeli depravity continues to emerge, western media and western political leaders still continue, for the most part, to be silent.

An exception is a recent Guardian report about Rakefet, an underground wing of the Ramla Prison in Israel, where numerous Palestinians from Gaza are “isolated in an underground jail where they never see daylight, are deprived of adequate food and barred from receiving news of their families or the outside world.” Despite claims by Ben-Gvir that Rakefet “was being rehabilitated to hold ‘Nukhba’ fighters who led massacres inside Israel, and Hezbollah special forces fighters captured in Lebanon”, the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel has revealed that it represents two prisoners who are clearly not any kind of combatant at all — a 34-year-old [male] nurse detained while at work in a hospital in December 2023 and a teenager seized in October 2024 as he passed through an Israeli checkpoint.”

On other reports, however, silence still prevails. Just days ago, Physicians for Human Rights Israel published another compelling report, “Deaths of Palestinians in Custody: Enforced Disappearances, Systematic Killings and Cover-Ups”, with testimonies here, confirming that at least 94 Palestinian prisoners have been killed in Israeli prison facilities since October 7, 2023, although, given the number of extrajudicial disappearances, PHRI also expressed “grave concerns that the actual number of Palestinians who have died in Israeli custody is significantly higher, particularly among those detained from Gaza.”

And on November 10, the Gaza-based Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR) published four harrowing accounts of the rape of Palestinians — one woman and three men — in Israeli prisons, who were arbitrarily seized in Gaza and just as arbitrarily released after being held for up to two years without charge or trial. Their accounts only add to the growing mountain of evidence confirming what PCHR described as “an organized and systematic practice of sexual torture, including rape, forced stripping, forced filming, sexual assault using objects and dogs, in addition to deliberate psychological humiliation aimed at crushing human dignity and erasing individual identity entirely.”

Yet again, however, the entire western mainstream media has turned a blind eye, and politicians are mute, which, in conclusion, I can only read as an indictment of the deeply embedded racism in western countries regarding the Palestinians.

To understand the silence, we need to recognize that, across newsrooms in the west, editors, if they noticed this story at all, would presumably defend their refusal to report on it by claiming that they were unable to independently verify the accounts.

What they fail to understand, however, is the deep racism that permeates their decisions, based on a fundamentally biased assumption, which, in many cases, they may not even recognize — that Israeli sources are implicitly trustworthy, while Palestinians are not.

In the case of claims of rape and sexual violence, the contrast between the scepticism of the west with regard to Palestinian accounts, and the unquestioning embrace of Israeli claims could not be more marked.

On October 7, 2023, most western media leapt unquestioningly on false claims of 40 beheaded babies and mass rapes propagated by Israeli sources, plastering the lies on their front pages, and amplifying them in lurid news reports. The reports were clearly designed by Israeli propagandists to stir up hysteria to justify its coming genocide, and the west walked right into the trap.

Shamefully, not a single western media outlet has retracted its amplification of Israel’s vile claims, even though they were all patently untrue, and have all been thoroughly discredited.

As was confirmed by Israel in December 2023, through an analysis of social security figures, only 36 children in total (those under the age of 18) were killed across southern Israel on October 7, and only two were infants. At the Kfar Aza kibbutz, where the 40 beheaded babies story originated, the youngest victim was 14 years old.

As for claims of mass rapes, those too have not been substantiated with any evidence. In January this year, Israeli media reported that Moran Gez, the Israeli prosecutor responsible for cases arising from the October 7 attacks, had “not identified a single victim in which a prosecution can be brought against an alleged perpetrator of a sexual attack”, as The Electronic Intifada described it.

Gez told Ynet, “In the end, we have no complainants,” confirming the conclusion reached by Amit Schwartz, an Israeli filmmaker and former air force intelligence official, who, despite her lack of experience, was commissioned by the New York Times as the lead writer of a shameful and discredited article, “‘Screams Without Words’: How Hamas Weaponized Sexual Violence on Oct. 7”, published in December 2023.

Although the Times’ team “extensively canvassed Israeli hospitals, rape crisis centers, sexual assault hotlines and other specialized facilities”, they “could not find a single victim of a 7 October sexual attack”, as The Electronic Intifada explained, adding that, as Schwarz herself explained in an interview with Israel’s Channel 12, “No one had met a victim of sexual assault.”

The west’s bias is unforgivable, and, as Israel continues its genocide, more stealthily than before its relentless bombing came to an end, it is unpardonable that its continuing depravity towards Palestinians in its network of grotesque torture prisons continues to be largely ignored.


Andy Worthington is a freelance investigative journalist, activist, author, photographer (of a photo-journalism project, ‘The State of London’, which ran from 2012 to 2023), film-maker and singer-songwriter (the lead singer and main songwriter for the London-based band The Four Fathers, whose music is available via Bandcamp). He is the co-founder of the Close Guantánamo campaign (see the ongoing photo campaign here) and the successful We Stand With Shaker campaign of 2014-15, and the author of The Guantánamo Files: The Stories of the 774 Detainees in America’s Illegal Prison and of two other books: Stonehenge: Celebration and Subversion and The Battle of the Beanfield. He is also the co-director (with Polly Nash) of the documentary film, “Outside the Law: Stories from Guantánamo”, which you can watch on YouTube here.

To receive new articles in your inbox, please subscribe to Andy’s new Substack account, set up in November 2024, where he’ll be sending out a weekly newsletter, or his RSS feed — and he can also be found on Facebook (and here), Twitter and YouTube. Also see the six-part definitive Guantánamo prisoner listThe Complete Guantánamo Files, the definitive Guantánamo habeas list, and the full military commissions list.  Please also consider joining the Close Guantánamo campaign, and, if you appreciate Andy’s work, feel free to make a donation via PayPal or via Stripe.

At Least 28 Palestinians—Including 17 Children—Killed by Israeli Strikes on Gaza

The strikes follow a massacre by Israeli forces of 13 Palestinians in a refugee camp in southern Lebanon.


Staff at al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, Palestine treat an infant badly wounded in an Israeli airstrike on November 19, 2025.
(Photo by Abood Abu Salama/Anadolu via Getty Images)


Brett Wilkins
Nov 19, 2025
COMMON DREAMS


Israel Defense Forces strikes killed at least 28 Palestinians including a woman and 17 children in the Gaza Strip Wednesday in the latest of what local officials say are over 400 Israeli violations of a tenuous ceasefire.

The IDF said it carried out strikes targeting neighborhoods in Gaza City and Khan Younis after “terrorists” opened fire on occupation troops—none of whom were harmed—in what the IDF called “a violation of the ceasefire agreement.”


RECOMMENDED...



At Least 13 Palestinians, ‘Mostly Children,’ Killed by Israel in Lebanon Massacre



One Month Into Ceasefire, Israel Continues ‘Silent Genocide’ in Gaza

Gaza officials said that more than 100 people were also wounded in Wednesday’s attacks, including one which medical personnel said targeted a building housing displaced families in the Zeitoun neighborhood, southeast of Gaza City.

Hamas—which rules Gaza and led the October 7, 2023 attack on Israel—condemned the attacks as “a dangerous escalation” and refuted the IDF’s claim while accusing Israel of attempting to “justify its ongoing crimes and violations.” Hamas also urged the United States to exert “immediate, serious pressure” on Israel to “respect the ceasefire and halt the aggression against our people.”

Israeli forces also continued bombing southern Lebanon on Wednesday, a day after at least 13 people were killed in an IDF airstrike on a Palestinian refugee camp in Ain al-Hilweh near Sidon. Local officials said most of the victims were children playing soccer.

Israel has been accused of repeatedly violating its ceasefire agreements with Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon.

More than 300 Palestinians have been killed and over 750 others wounded in what officials say are nearly 400 Israeli violations of the October ceasefire with Hamas.

Since agreeing to a truce with Hezbollah in November 2024, Israeli forces have also killed at least 121 civilians, including 21 women and 16 children, in Lebanon, according to officials there.

Overall, Israel’s 775-day assault and siege on Gaza has left at least 249,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing and millions more forcibly displaced, starved, and sickened.

Israel’s bombardment and invasion of Lebanon killed more than 4,000 people, according to the Lebanese Ministry of Public Health. This figure includes at least 790 women and 316 children. More than 16,600 others have been wounded. Upward of 1.2 million Lebanese were also forcibly displaced by Israel’s attacks and invasion.


 

The World’s Most Beautiful Woman


Why the Palestinians will never be defeated


There is a reason that the Palestinians will never be defeated; they grow more beautiful every day — in our hearts and minds. At the November 14, 2025 Palestine Center conference, Palestinian-American Sereen Haddad displayed the magnificent radiance and steadfastness that has characterized the Palestinians. Ms. Haddad, recently graduated from Virginia Commonwealth University, where my son also graduated, but not before she showed the completeness of the Palestinians and the emptiness of those who attempt to subdue their aspirations.

Her voice is eloquently available at the conference. Click arrow twice to start. Then move little circle at bottom left of screen to 30 minute mark and, if paused, click once to play.

In alleys and streets, the voices rise,
Echoes of resistance, touching the skies,
From every corner, young and old,
Palestine’s story, bravely told.
Stone against might, hand in hand,
On this sacred, cherished land,
From dawn to dusk, they remain firm,
With every chant, their spirits affirm.
In the heart of conflict, love remains,
Through the struggles, through the pains,
For in each echo, hope persists,
In the land where resistance exists.

Maya Anthony

Dan Lieberman publishes commentaries on foreign policy, economics, and politics at substack.com.  He is author of the non-fiction books A Third Party Can Succeed in AmericaNot until They Were GoneThink Tanks of DCThe Artistry of a Dog, and a novel: The Victory (under a pen name, David L. McWellan). Read other articles by Dan.

Trump’s Gaza “Peace” Plan: A Cruel Joke in a Conflict and Peace Illiterate World

The fact that the outlandish and quackish Trump “peace” plan for the genocided Gaza was passed by the UN Security Council defines the end of every understanding of true peace.



“The Throne of Peace is Now Empty and the UN Cancelled” • AI-generated image by Jan Oberg

The UN Security Council adopted a U.S.-drafted resolution on November 17, 2025, endorsing Donald Trump’s Gaza peace plan. It authorised an International Stabilisation Force (ISF), backed a transitional governing body called the “Board of Peace”, and declared that conditions may now exist for a credible pathway to Palestinian self-determination and eventual statehood. The vote passed 13–0, with Russia and China abstainingThis is UN SC Resolution 2803.

This goes against everything the UN stands for. Of course, China and Russia wisely abstained. They want no involvement and co-responsibility with this fake peace plan and are smart enough to see that it will never lead to true peace.

I ask myself – did the Trump Regime give the UN its death knell yesterday? It remains to be seen, but the consequences will be devastating and, tragically, associated with the name of its otherwise decent S-G, who has been completely outmanoeuvred.

On October 14, the China Academy and its editor, Mimi, of “China Roughly” conducted the interview below with me, which begins with my harsh criticism of this nonsensical, absurd, and unacceptable way of making peace.”Peace.” No wonder the video title: “Trump’s Gaza Ceasefire Plan Was Hilarious from the Start – Best US Joke Ever.”

I call it a joke, and I will add that, if this has anything to do with peace, there is no need for political satire anymore. This is a satire on peace, intellectualism, international law and political ethics.

Quick and simple reasons for that:

  • A party to a conflict can not be a mediator or peacemaker; it has to be a neutral third party. The US has been on the side of Israel all the time and is the leading enabler of its genocide.
  • A war criminal and habitual international law-violator cannot be a mediator or lead a peace process; Trump and his suggested “peace” board member, Tony Blair, both have that status, albeit being non-convicted.
  • The conflicts that lie under and cause the unspeakable violence in Gaza, characterised by words such as apartheid, historical injustices, asymmetry, nuclearism, occupation and Zionism, as well as Hamas militancy, are not analysed or addressed. The underlying conflict, not the surface violence, is the key to solving a conflict. This “peace” plan is pure symptom treatment.
  • The larger conflicts in the Middle East region that this conflict is part of are not addressed.
  • The whole project smacks of contemporary colonialism – we Westerners put ourselves up as those who shall run Gaza, and we have decided that it shall be demilitarised while we say nothing about Israeli militarism, occupation and nuclearism.
  • There is no understanding of this particular type of a-symmetric conflict which requires different approaches from symmetric conflicts.
  • All involved parties have not been addressed with three simple but fundamental questions: What do you think this conflict is about? What do you fear most and what future would you prefer or accept to live with – from which a mediator begins to look at possible arrangements and various possible futures.
  • There is no idea about consultations leading to a negotiation table. It is all done from outside by an incompetent, impossible “mediator” who has snatched the conflict from the weaker party.
  • Professional peace-making would build economic and other relations into a plan in such a way that the parties to a conflict would see it as more advantageous to cooperate than to fight each other in the future. There is no mention of anything like that, and of course, there will be more violence and no peace.
  • Professional peace-making would have utilised the world’s most experienced peace-making machinery, namely the United Nations. Instead of experienced, principled, trained and neutral UN peacekeepers and other UN elements drawn from around the world, this plan will deploy personnel from countries with a special political and/or economic interest that have no training in peacekeeping – perhaps, God forbid, even NATO countries.
  • A professional peace-making would have focused on post-violence processes and institutions such as forgiveness and reconciliation, a truth commission, security sector reform, de-militarising all sides, and discussing how schoolbooks, culture and cooperative projects could help the parties to live with what has happened and, slowly but surely, become partners in a process leading eventually to peace, stability and cooperation among all parties.

One could go on and on.

The fact that the UN Security Council has passed this cynical, miserable humbug “peace” resolution and virtually all parties and media call this a peace plan speaks volumes of the world’s peace illiteracy, of its peace and overwhelming endorsement of militarism.

That the UN Secretary-General goes along with this sidelining of his organisation and the defilement of everything the UN stands for only adds to the tragedy.

*****

And why is true peace, as predictably as tragically, now dead?

Because people of low intelligence and/or being uneducated in conflict understanding prefer violence to non-violence.

Because we have no peace education, no peace academies, no university-level peace research and public education. Because media, politics and research have cancelled, tabooed and disappeared peace, by and large, since the fall of the Soviet Union and the dissolution of Yugoslavia – that is, the ravaging of the US-led unipolar world that is now coming to its end, also with this resolution.

Because not a single government leader has an adviser who knows the slightest about alternatives to militarist “solutions” – knows about mediation, peace-making and reconciliation – as a science and an art.

Because kakistocrats and the MIMAC – the Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex – see all problems as something to use a hammer on because they only have a hammer in the toolbox.

Because peace requires creativity, knowledge and empathy – which are no longer characteristic of, or needed in, foreign policy- and security policy-making.

I am sure that with this Las VeGaza “peace” plan, Trump will be a high-ranking candidate for the 2026 NATO-aligned Nobel Peace Prize – that is, if it doesn’t finally decide to give it posthumously to Adolf Hitler…

PS The countries of the Security Council that made this fatal decision are: The US, Russia, China, France, the UK (all permanent members) + Algeria, Denmark, Greece, Guyana, Pakistan, Panama, Republic of Korea, Sierra Leone, Slovenia and Somalia – in other words, mostly countries that will follow orders from Washington. As mentioned, China and Russia abstained.

*****

Jan Oberg is a peace researcher, art photographer, and Director of The Transnational (TFF) where this article first appeared. Reach him at: oberg@transnational.orgRead other articles by Jan.

 

United States: The key characteristics of Trump’s second term


Resist Trump placard

First published at International Socialism Project.

We are almost through with the first year of Trump’s tumultuous second presidency. What follows is an outline of some of the key features of Trumpism and how they are playing out so far.

In terms of foreign policy, Trump’s second term signals qualitative shifts away from the neoliberal market precepts of “free trade” and the maintenance of stable alliances with chosen allies, to one marked by high (and constantly shifting) tariffs, “transactional” relationships based on financial pressure, and threats of military coercion of “enemies” as well as allies. One unnamed US official has summarized Trump’s “American First” approach as follows: “Countries who choose to align with U.S. interests and are open to mutually beneficial deals reap the benefits” … “and have the option of partnering with our incredible military and intelligence services.” Countries that “enable and support cartels who poison U.S. citizens or allow adversarial nations access to control critical infrastructure or base hostile capabilities in our backyard…will feel pressure to change course.”

The US is currently in the midst of a massive US military buildup in the Caribbean. Dozens of small boats, allegedly drug smuggling, have been destroyed so far, killing 80. Under the pretense of fighting drug cartels, military action in Venezuela — and possibly Mexico — are currently being considered by the Trump administration. Gunboat diplomacy is back with a vengeance.

Domestically, Trump has implemented rapid-fire a series of initiatives that threaten to severely erode, if not overturn, the traditional political system in the United States and turn it toward a more authoritarian model. This is something that until recently, outside of Trump circles, was considered unthinkable. The US political system — with the two capitalist parties, one liberal, one conservative — assuming government every four to eight years, is under extreme strain and the outcome isn’t yet clear. And unlike his previous presidential term, Trump has amassed a more solid coalition with a more developed plan of action.

Trump is clearly part of an authoritarian turn, which is a global phenomenon. What’s different is this turn is occurring inside the leading world power under one of its two major parties — the GOP appears to be jettisoning its own longstanding traditions based upon the constitutional so-called “checks and balances,” the vaunted two-party system. It appears as if the system is being strained from within until it explodes, or morphs before our eyes potentially into a one-party dictatorship. This development has alarmed whole sections of centrist and liberal commentators and Democratic Party politicians, not just ordinary people feeling the brunt of Trump’s vicious attacks and economic policies.

Trump, very much like a monarch, has created a coterie of sycophants who praise him incessantly at every White House briefing. His administration includes open racists, conspiracy crackpots, science, climate change and vaccine deniers, former mediocre right-wing television celebrities, and outright fascists like White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, who believe that America should be a whites-only country. Trump’s base is not only the traditional base of the Republican party, but also includes the hard-core far right like the Proud Boys, Groypers, and other fascist organizations. Trump has built a right to far right coalition that includes Christian Nationalists (both evangelicals and Catholics), White nationalists, and Right-wing think-tanks funded by billionaires.

In line with other authoritarian politicians, Trump has leveraged his position to turn the state into a cash machine for him and his cronies, using his position of power to extract wealth through various means, including extortion based on legal threats, sales of Trump-themed trinkets, lavish gifts, and crypto-currency trading. According to a report by the Center for American Progress, the Trump family, as of late October, has pocketed $1.8 billion in cash and gifts since the 2024 presidential election. The most visible symbol of the excess of the regime was that at the very moment during the government shutdown that SNAP benefits (known as food stamps) upon which over 40 million Americans depend for food security were set to expire, Trump held a “Great Gatsby”-themed Halloween party at Mar-a-Lago which included scantily-clad women dancing in giant martini glasses.

Trump has the support, for now, of large sections of the ruling class.

Big businesses, major universities, as well as other institutions, have caved to Trump after legal/financial threats; others have done so in the hope of currying favor or at least to ward off negative attention. Many have made the simple financial calculation that, in the context of Trump’s cuts to social spending ($1.2 trillion in cuts in programs like Medicaid and food stamps), his generous tax breaks to the rich, and his almost complete deregulation of industry — as well as his assault on government unions and mass firings — the benefits of a Trump presidency far outweigh the problems. Tech/AI giants — the heart of the current overheated investment boom that is buoying the US economy for the time being — this time around are backing Trump, based on their desire not only to get on the financial gravy train, but to boost US competitiveness vs. China.

Trump’s “big beautiful bill” represents, according to some calculations, one of the greatest, if not the greatest single transfer of wealth in US history. In this context, Oxfam’s recent report — that the top 10 US billionaires have seen their wealth since Trump’s election increase by $698 billion — is noteworthy. (Meanwhile, Tesla’s board just voted to give Elon Musk a trillion dollars over the next ten years, contingent on meeting certain extremely ambitious long-term goals). As one commentator writing in the New Yorker wrote, “The profit motive certainly plays a prominent role: from Mussolini’s Italy and Nazi Germany to Vladimir Putin’s Russia and modern China, there is a long history of major corporations conceding to authoritarian governments for commercial reasons.”

OF course, tax cuts for the rich, deregulation of industry, trade, and banking, cuts in social safety net spending, and the ballooning of military, police, and immigration enforcement spending — are not new. Five decades of neoliberalism, carried out under both political parties, produced Trumpism: these were processes that went on no matter which party was at the helm. The Democrats have ever-shifted rightward, reinforcing the status quo each time, acting as a political block on any genuine political alternative.

It was Bill Clinton, after all, who passed the “omnibus” crime bill that led to an explosion of mass incarceration affecting Black, brown, and poor people in the US; Clinton who ended “welfare as we know it; Clinton who promised to eliminate “big government.” Barack Obama, who was known among immigrant rights activists as the “Deporter in Chief,” bailed out Wall Street but not main street. Biden/Harris tried to catch out the GOP by proposing tough anti-immigration enforcement which Republicans turned down. Abortion rights were slowly eroded, and the Democrats did little or nothing to resist it, and it was under Biden’s administration that the student movement against the genocide in Gaza was smashed on university campuses. Right wing policy passed by the Republicans have rarely been scrapped by the following Democratic administration (an example would be Obama’s use of a law passed under Bush II during the “war on terror” permitting targeting killings and assassinations against “enemy combatants”), despite their election time rhetoric that the only “answer” to the danger of the right is to vote Democratic.

Some of Trump’s policies were already being at least partially developed under Biden and previous administrations. In particular, Biden attempted to put through policies aimed at restricting computer chips to China and implementing more selective tariffs and trade restrictions designed to encourage industry to be rebuilt inside the US (known as “reshoring”) — a policy at least in part dictated by a concern that in the event of war with China, the US would be left vulnerable for imports that the military depends on to produce ammunition, weapons, ships, and aircraft — for example rare earth minerals, whose production currently is almost completely dominated by China. Meanwhile, the war on terror after 9/11 had already been used as an excuse to ramp up the domestic surveillance state.

But there has been a qualitative shift in US politics since Trump has taken office — adding up to a series of policies aimed at rolling back gains of social and working-class movements going back to the 1920s:

  1. An all-out terrorist offensive from day one on undocumented immigrants, particularly immigrants of color, and largely immigrants without the slightest run-ins with the law. The behavior of masked, heavily armed thugs is drawing popular comparisons with Hitler’s Gestapo. Trump’s ultimate aim is to end “birthright citizenship.” The ICE dragnet has also ensnared many people are citizens of the US or are here with Green Cards or legal visas.
  2. The sending of National Guard troops to DC, and potentially Chicago and Portland — to back up the ICE and Border Patrol goons already there (as well as in other cities) — against immigrants but also to “fight crime,” i.e., code for attacking Black people. (Trump’s September 30 speech to the globally summoned generals spoke of using American cities as “training grounds” for US troops practicing for overseas conflicts.)
  3. The ending of “diversity, equity, and inclusion,” and “wokeness,” i.e. a fierce campaign to dismantle any and all protections and advantages for anyone other than straight white men. The offensive includes an all-out assault on trans people. One of Trump’s first actions was to issue an executive order declaring that there are only “two sexes,” and immediately halting all “diversity, equity, and inclusion” programs.
  4. An assault on government agencies, jobs, government unions, and social spending (except for the various armed forces of the US state).
  5. An assault on science, including massive cuts to research.
  6. A campaign to criminalize resistance and define any and all opposition to Trump as terrorism — stepped up considerably after the national martyrization of Turning-Point leader Charlie Kirk after his assassination on September 10.
  7. The effective use of a supine and supportive Supreme Court that so far has largely given Trump what he wants.
  8. The pardoning of supporters (including the Jan 6, 2021, rioters), and the weaponization of the justice department to deploy it against Trump’s perceived opponents, including legal action against former FBI director James Comey, former national security adviser John Bolton and New York attorney general Letitia James.

The scope of Trump’s attack on free speech was made even clearer after Kirk’s assassination. In September he designated “antifa” as a “domestic terror organization,” and issued National Security Presidential Memorandum directing federal law enforcement and other agencies to investigate and disrupt any and all left-of-center nonprofit organizations that oppose his agenda. The memorandum listed as examples of “domestic terrorism” things like “anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity,” “extremism on migration, race, and gender,” and opposition to “traditional American views on family, religion, and morality.” In short, if you are not a right-wing supporter of Trump, you are a domestic terrorist.

This has all been accompanied by an extreme ramping up of violent rhetoric. (White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said for example after the recent “No Kings” protests, “The Democrat Party’s main constituency is made up of Hamas terrorists, illegal aliens, and violent criminals.”) On the other hand, no armed forces of the state other than local police forces were deployed against the 7 million so-called “terrorists” who came out to the “No Kings” protests. This helps show the gap that still exists between aspirations of the regime and its current reach. No doubt the Trump administration would like to close that gap.

His foreign policy, at least on paper, is designed to restore America’s “greatness” — compelling, through tariffs, foreign and domestic investment in the US to rebuild its industrial base and win the battle for dominance with China in Latin America, the Pacific and elsewhere. Whether and to what extent this can, or will happen, is up for debate. Even clearer is the U.S. turn toward old-fashioned “gunboat diplomacy” in Latin America. Trump has also recently threatened military action against Nigeria for not “protecting” Christians, and the US has been quietly building up its military forces in Crete with the cooperation of the Greek government.

It isn’t yet completely clear what military threats are designed to put pressure on a particular country, and which ones are going to be backed up, and to what extent, by military action — though an invasion of Venezuela, given the military buildup, seems closest to becoming a reality.

Take the case of the Panamanian ports, for example. First, Trump threatened to invade Panama and retake the canal on the grounds that there was too much Chinese influence over the canal; he then used the threat to force Panama to compel it to reject the running of its two major ports by Hong-Kong based company CK Hutchinson. Under pressure, CK Hutchinson agreed to sell its 80 percent ownership of 43 ports, including two in Panama, to a consortium headed by the US firm Black Rock. The deal was resisted by China, which insisted that as a quid pro quo the Chinese firm COSCO be added to the consortium with a 20-30 percent stake in the 43 ports outside of Panama, which has frozen the talks. According to an analysis in Foreign Policy magazine, the US is reportedly considering a deal in which it allows COSCO to gain a stake in the other 41 terminals and Black Rock gets the 2 Panamanian ones. The outcome is not yet clear, but if this is the deal the US gets, it will allow Trump to claim a victory in Panama while China extends its economic reach elsewhere.

The question of rebuilding US economic capabilities in the event of a major military conflict is key to current policy. For example, the US military is required by law to build all its ships in the US, but China has 232 times the shipbuilding capacity of the US., according to the US Office of Naval Intelligence. China booked 74 percent of the world’s shipbuilding orders last year; Korea, 17 percent; the US? 0.2 percent. The US is making deals with Korea and Japan to create joint ventures in Korea and in the US, for example, the Korean shipbuilder Hanwha is building up and modernizing a Shipyard in Philadelphia, and Trump is clearly for this kind of “reshoring.” The Trump administration is also currently ramping up its efforts to make trade deals with countries other than China, such as Kazakhstan and Australia, as well as reopening abandoned mines in Alaska and other parts of the US, along with processing facilities, to gain access to rare earth minerals, a market currently dominated by China.

The biggest problem with the plan to “onshore” and restore US manufacturing is the incredible degree of internationalization of trade and of manufacturing components. The internationalization of production has developed to the point where there is no such thing, for example, as a car produced and manufactured in a single country — a fact that holds true for millions of products. Car parts that find their way into a finished product are themselves composed of parts and materials from all over the world.

Under these circumstances, the blunt instrument of tariffs (even if they weren’t as confusing and erratic as they are under Trump) are not going to act as the magic bullet. Since the US is not about to become an autarkic economy that can survive solely on raw materials and goods produced inside its borders, tariffs will always have a double-edged impact, causing supply chain disruptions and increased production costs for many manufacturers. The idea that the United States is going to protect its way back to industrial dominance is a pipe dream.

But to the extent that it is implemented, it will involve a massive attack on the living standards of workers and the poor in the US in order to attempt to make US companies competitive with China. Making “American Great Again” is about cutting labor costs, eliminating the social wage, and using the state to craft a more integrated “military industrial complex.” To the extent that any of these plans go forward, it requires an even more massive shift of wealth from the bottom to the top. All of these things will make millions of working-class and poor Americans’ lives considerably worse than they are even today.

The economic impact of Trump’s policies is already being felt. October layoffs surged to a 22-year high in the US, and hiring has been anemic. This comes in a year where there have already been hundreds of thousands of US government-related jobs cut by “DOGE”, and the recent government shutdown led to the cutoff to millions in wages and food stamps. Inflation is currently at 3 percent, but that undercounts the impact of food, housing, and gas/transportation costs for ordinary people. Food inflation is eating into wages. Exit polls in the recent elections indicate that there is increasing concern over the state of the economy.

The economic uncertainty is likely to get worse, not only because of the tariff mess. There is increasingly a sense that the AI/tech boom is a bubble that is about to burst. The CEO of chipmaker Nvidia (with a current inflated value of $5 trillion) expressed anger over a report that the investor made famous by the film “The Big Short,” Michael Burry (who predicted the housing market collapse in 2008), for his recent announcement that he is betting against tech giants Nvidia and Palantir.

There is an element of irrationality, unpredictability, and impulsivity in Trump’s behavior — as well as ideologically driven decisions that do not neatly fit into successful policy from the standpoint of American imperialism. First, there is the complete lack of a coherent tariff strategy — they seem to change every week, hindering investments, hiring, and leading many countries to consider the US an unreliable partner they must work around to find alternatives.

There are other examples. Trump recently dropped trade talks with Canada, for example, over an Ontario advertisement (accurately) quoting Reagan against tariffs. Another example is the abandonment of non-fossil fuel-based energies. Trump is not doubling down on fossil fuels — which from a US perspective makes sense because it is currently the world’s leading producer of oil and natural gas. But simultaneously he is completely ceding dominance on renewal energy, for example solar, hydrogen, and wind, to China.

And then there is the “brain drain.” The United States has historically drawn talent from other countries; Trump is reversing this process. His massive cuts in federal grants to university and other scientific research institutions for their alleged inability to combat “antisemitism”; his harassment, arrest, detention and deportation of foreign students who have criticized him or Israel’s genocide; his commitment to revoke the visas of Chinese as well as other foreign students; and his recent decision to charge $100,000 for an HB1 visa for skilled foreign workers coming to the US have all contributed to what is being called a “brain drain” from the United States. In addition to the billions of dollars universities will lose from the loss of tuition from foreign students whose fear of the Trump administration has prompted them to leave or simply not apply to US universities, and the key areas of medical and scientific research that are already suffering from the cuts, it’s clear that tens of thousands of potential applicants to US universities and US jobs are now looking elsewhere. According to Nature, in the first few months of the Trump administration the number of US applicants looking for jobs in Canada increased by 41 percent, in Europe by 32 percent, and in China and other Asian countries by 59 percent over the same time last year; while the number of European applicants for jobs in the US declined in the same period by 41 percent. Researchers in the US who have lost their funding are looking to China, Europe, Canada and elsewhere to continue their work.

Does the Trump presidency represent a turn toward Fascism? That is an ongoing question and too much to deal with in this article. But it is at the very least fascist-adjacent. Perhaps telling is that Trumps nomination for the Office of Special Counsel, Paul Ingrassia, was withdrawn when it was revealed he had made a statement that he had a “nazi streak.” And yet it’s quite clear that homeland security adviser Stephen Miller is a rabid supporter of the idea of the “great replacement,” the white nationalist theory that there is an ongoing “genocide” against white people. And there can be no doubt that far-right politics have been normalized by the right-wing media. The right-wing Fox news host Tucker Carlson recently had a friendly interview with openly fascist anti-Semite Nick Fuentes — where they discussed the domination of Jews over US politics and business. Fuentes has in the past made statements like “Hitler was awesome,” and “Jews have no future in America.”

Moreover, with state power in Trump’s hands, he does not need fascist shock troops — but he has opened the door to hiring the far-right dregs of society into ICE. In a very real sense, ICE is deliberately recruiting people who want to don masks while they inflict violence on defenseless immigrant families.

What we have is a regime that is pushing in several fronts as far as it can go toward an authoritarian state, testing who and where there is resistance, and continuing to push, seeing what legal rulings it can ignore, what policies it can push and bend, what new ones it can create. It is engaged in a deeply authoritarian turn that aims at the very least to severely curtail the already meager trappings of formal democracy that exist in the United States.

What the future holds isn’t yet clear. It is not out of the realm of possibility that Trump manufactures a crisis in order to declare an “emergency” to cancel the 2028 election; another possibility is that he finds a way to change the constitution to allow himself to run for a third term, with the hope that jerry-rigging the electoral map with guarantee him the majority he needs in the electoral college. The former is clearly his preference — he told a Turning Point USA meeting before the election, to wild cheers: “in four years, you don’t have to vote again. We’ll have it fixed so good, you’re not gonna have to vote.”

Alternatively, the political system could still survive this crisis after Trump is forced out of office by electoral means in the midterms and in 2028; or after he loses an election and attempts a January 6, 2021-style “coup”, this time with more state forces at his disposal, to “stop the steal.” Naturally, if this latter scenario transpired, the outcome would be determined by forces outside of the traditional constitutional process. The outcome is not yet clear. Much will depend on how much and what kind of resistance develops.

This is an edited version of a presentation given in Geneva, Switzerland on Sunday, November 9 as part of a seminar organized by the leftist web site Alencontre.com.

Paul D'Amato is the author of The Meaning of Marxism and was the editor of the International Socialist Review. He is the author of numerous articles on a wide array of topics.

MAGA women facing 'existential clash'


 A group of Trump supporters display their "Women For Trump" and "Keep America Great" signs during the "Make America Great Again" rally held at the Mohegan Sun Arena.

November 20, 2025
ALTERNET

As young women drove this month's Democratic sweep in three states, MAGA women are facing an "existential clash" about what it means to be female and conservative in 2025, writes The Atlantic's Elaine Godfrey.

Godfrey writes about 29-year-old Raquel Debono, a MAGA influencer and lawyer turned party planner, whose "Make America Hot Again" events in New York City were designed to attract "fun, sexy conservatives."

Debono says that the usual MAGA parties she went to were "stuffy," so she decided to throw her own for conservatives who "who might enjoy, say, low taxes and public fornication," Godfrey writes.

Debono, Godfrey explains, "finds the president hilarious and supports his crackdown on illegal immigration, but she also believes that casual sex, abortion, and gay marriage are fine."

"I’ve found Debono fascinating because her attitude is so at odds with those of the more socially conservative women in her political party — women who like to advise their peers to prioritize starting a family over having a career, for example, and who talk about the importance of 'submission' in marriage (and who might not, in other words, be so chill about a couple of sloshed singles getting it on in a bar bathroom)," Godfrey explains.

Women like Debono, who are "socially libertarian," she adds, "have set off an angry debate about which kinds of women are in fact welcome in the MAGA tent."

Debono says there's a difference between what she calls "city Republicans" and "tradwives" — women who embrace and promote a lifestyle centered on traditional gender roles and submission to men, often as a reaction to what they see as the pressures of modern feminism and the "girlboss" era.

If the right wing doesn’t lighten up soon, Debono tells Godfrey, “they’re going to push every woman out of the Republican Party.”

"Like many Trump voters, Debono supports the president for reasons that are less to do with policy and more to do with the freedom to offend," Godfrey explains.

"A lot of it comes down to political correctness," she tells Godfrey, who notes that she uses slurs that would get her canceled outside the MAGAsphere, and admits that she doesn't like Muslims.

Ironically, Debono happens to be Canadian and can't even vote in America despite the fact that "she has managed to make American politics at least a part-time job," Godfrey explains.

"I’m a Sex and the City conservative,” Debono tells Godfrey, referring to the HBO hit about love, shoes, friendships and Cosmopolitans in late 90s and early 2000s Manhattan.

"She sees her role as showing women that there is more than one way to be a Republican," Godfrey explains.

“Breaking news: you can have a job, a martini and still be conservative,” Debono posted earlier this year. “Sry @ trad wives.”

Debono calls Turning Point USA, the conservative youth group founded by murdered MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk, "creepy" and "cult-y," and is seemingly at odds with the women of that group that also make up the MAGA base.

Alex Clark, a 32-year-old Turning Point contributor and podcast host tells Godfrey that Debono's brand of female conservative isn't her cup of tea.

"It’s not conservatism if a bunch of people are involved that aren’t conservative,” she says.

And while Debono thinks Republicans will lose women if they remain as conservative, Clark disagrees, saying that as more young men turn to the GOP, so will young women, because it’s their “natural instinct to follow strong men and strong leadership."

Godfrey says there are a "universe of conservatives to the right of women like Clark," who fall into what she calls "the Ultra-Trad Zone," with hardliners who see Clark and Debono as "covert feminists."

"And after young women voted overwhelmingly for Democrats this month, some of these ultra-trads argued that maybe the Nineteenth Amendment had worn out its welcome," Godfrey notes.

There’s no way to make women more conservative, Savanna Stone, a 20-year-old married influencer, wrote on X. “You just take away their right to vote or make any political decisions.”

MAGA influencer Emily Wilson thinks that's too extreme and, Godfrey explains, "sees the right wing’s hectoring about women’s roles as a huge political liability."

“We’re going to lose elections if we don’t agree to go to the middle ground,” she says.

These differing views are causing infighting between the MAGA women, Godfrey notes.

Wilson found herself in a profanity-and-slur-fueled beef with Sarah Stock, a Catholic commentator and self-described Christian nationalist, who tells Godfrey, "I have no problem with infighting. It exposes a lot of these people as frauds.”

And though this rift isn't poised to split MAGA apart, Godfrey notes, "This month’s disappointing election results have Debono doubling down on her quest to win women and keep the tent big."

Godfrey says that "in September, Debono started consulting for Ethan Agarwal, a Silicon Valley entrepreneur and candidate for governor of California, who also happens to be a Democrat."

"He’s a moderate. A Republican is not going to win in California," she tells Godfrey.

"Rather than aligning herself with a losing team, she has simply picked a more winnable fight," Godfrey writes.
WAIT, WHAT?! 
Leavitt argues Trump was being respectful when calling a female reporter 'piggy'
ORWELLIAN NATION


White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt holds a press briefing at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 22, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

November 20, 2025
ALTERNET

On Air Force One over the weekend, President Donald Trump attacked a female reporter, calling her "piggy."

Bloombert's White House correspondent, Catherine Lucey, began asking Trump why he was continuing to resist the release of the Department of Justice's remaining Jeffrey Epstein evidence, "if there's nothing incriminating" about him in the investigation files around the deceased sex offender.

Trump replied, "Quiet! Quiet, piggy!"

The story about Trump's links to Epstein has persisted, as have questions about his comment to the reporter.

During the Thursday briefing, a reporter asked White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt what he meant by that. She tried to argue that Trump was actually being "respectful" to the reporter.

"Look, the president is very frank and honest with everyone in this room," Leavitt said. "You've all seen it yourself. You've all experienced it yourselves. And I think it's one of the many reasons the American people reelected this president — because of his frankness. He calls out fake news when he sees it. He gets frustrated with reporters when you lie about him. When you spread fake news about him and his administration."

"But, he also is the most transparent president in history," claimed Leavitt. "And he gives all of you, as you know, unprecedented access. You are in the Oval Office almost every day, asking the president questions. So, I think, the president being frank and open and honest to your faces rather than hiding behind your backs is, frankly, a lot more respectful than what you saw in the last administration."

She said that former President Joe Biden "lied to your face and didn't speak to you for weeks."


Watch Leavitt's remarks below: