Thursday, November 27, 2025

 

Over half of global coastal settlements are retreating inland due to intensifying climate risks




University of Copenhagen





A new study using satellite nightlight data reveals that more than half of the world’s coastal settlements have retreated inland over the past 30 years in response to intensifying climate hazards. The study coauthored by University of Copenhagen researchers also identified regions moving towards the coast despite the risks.   

For centuries, coastlines have attracted dense human settlement and economic activity. Today, more than 40 percent of the global population lives within 100 kilometers of the coast, where facing accelerating sea-level rise, coastal erosion, flooding, and tropical cyclones.

Although moving away from the coast - known as “retreat” - is often viewed as an adaptive strategy, its global extent and drivers have remained unclear. A new study published in Nature Climate Change fills this gap by providing the first global evidence that coastal retreat is driven more by social and infrastructural vulnerability than by historical exposure to hazards.

The study was conducted by an international team led by researchers from Sichuan University and included remote sensing experts from the University of Copenhagen (Alexander Prishchepov and Shengping Ding, IGN). It maps settlement movements across 1,071 coastal regions in 155 countries. By integrating nighttime light observations with global socioeconomic datasets, the researchers found that 56% of coastal regions have retreated from the coast from 1992 to 2019, and 16% of regions, including the Copenhagen area in Denmark, have moved closer to the coast, while 28% have remained stable.

A Growing but Uneven Global Shift

“More than half of the world’s coastal regions are moving away from the shoreline, with Africa (67%) and Oceania (59%) leading the retreat. However, in parts of Asia and South America, many communities continue to expand toward the coast” explains co-author Dr. Shengping Ding, who just defended his PhD thesis on a topic relevant to the article at the Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management at the University of Copenhagen.

The study highlights a significant adaptation gap: nearly half of low-income regions—especially in Africa and Asia—are unable to retreat, often due to the pursuit of socioeconomic improvement, reliance on coastal land and lack of alternative resources.  This leaves millions more exposed to coastal flooding and erosion.

Interestingly, retreat is most common in middle-income countries. Researchers say these nations sit  at a tipping point: they possess enough institutional capacity and financial resources to support relocation, yet have not reached the level of wealth where they can rely solely on protective infrastructure.

Meanwhile, both low- and high-income regions tend to stay near or move even closer to the coast - though for very different reasons. Poorer regions often expand shoreline settlements in search of livelihoods, infrastructure access, and economic opportunity. In contrast, wealthier regions may feel confident in their ability to manage climate risks, relying on advanced infrastructure, early warning systems and coastal defenses.

Vulnerability, not past experience, mainly drive coastal retreat

Recently, the increased risk of floods and resulting damages to coastal settlements has sparked debate in Denmark, with critics accusing politicians of delaying promised policies that would protect property owners from damages.

Despite this, Denmark , exemplified by the capital region of Copenhagen,  is amongst the minority of regions moving closer to the coast these past decades, the research shows.

“Compared to poorer regions, Denmark has strong infrastructure and greater capacity to adapt to rising coastal risk. Danes also tend to trust that policymakers will do what is necessary to protect vulnerable coastlines. Places like Copenhagen and Aarhus historically served as major trade and industrial coastal cities. However, trust alone may not be enough, with documented erosion in parts of Denmark, proactive inland planning and resilience measures are becoming increasingly important” says Co-author Associate Professor Alexander V. Prishchepov, Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen.

Interestingly, it is not the frequency of past disasters in a region that mainly drives coastal retreat, the study shows. Instead, it is the current vulnerability to coastal hazards which accelerates it - particularly where infrastructure protection is limited and adaptive capacity (social, economic and political means) is low.

“Our analysis shows that coastal retreat mostly happens a response to low protection and weak adaptive capacity in places where communities don’t have the means to protect themselves. Such regions tend to experience faster retreat, not necessarily because of more hazards, but because they lack the capacity to stay,” adds Shengping Ding.

The study used the method “mixed-effects modelling” - a statistical tool that enhances the analysis of complex data structures by incorporating both fixed and random effects. This approach demonstrated that a 1% improvement in a region's adaptive capacity resulted in a 4.2% reduction in retreat speed, and a 1% increase in structural protection led to a 6.4% reduction.

Lessons for global coastal adaptation

Alexander V. Prishchepov highlights that the study provides valuable lessons for climate adaptation worldwide, including in Denmark, where land reclamation and coastal development are extensive.

“Our research shows that vulnerability, not just hazard exposure, determines whether communities adapt proactively or are forced to retreat reactively. For countries like Denmark, where coastal expansion continues, understanding these global dynamics is crucial for policymakers to avoid future maladaptation”, says Prishchepov. “Globally, we must shift from reactive retreat to proactive planning, integrating social vulnerability into long-term coastal management.”

He also points out the importance of further research.

“Though this research offers valuable insight into global migration patterns, more study is needed to fully understand them. Particularly in socially-fragile regions such as African countries, night-time light data may not tell the whole story, as economic activity and settlements extent are not necessarily linked to luminous activity in regions with limited electrification,” says Prishchepov.

Read the study, “Global coastal human settlement retreat driven by vulnerability to coastal climate hazards.

  

 

 Journal

 

Researchers warn: Climate change could expand habitats for malaria mosquitoes




If we fail to curb climate change, malaria mosquitoes could significantly expand their habitats across Africa, exposing hundreds of millions of people to a higher risk of infection




University of Copenhagen




An insistent buzzing at sunset followed by itchy, spotted legs. Here in Denmark, mosquitoes are mostly an annoying – but generally harmless – nuisance. That is far from the case in many parts of the world.

Every year, around 600,000 people die from malaria, a mosquito-borne disease – most of them in sub-Saharan Africa, and children are the most vulnerable. This makes malaria one of the deadliest infectious diseases globally.

A new study from the University of Copenhagen, published in Global Change Biology, shows that future climate change could create more favourable conditions for malaria mosquitoes, exposing millions of people across large parts of Africa to more dangerous mosquito bites.

“Our study indicates that climate change will benefit these malaria mosquitoes. This could put between 200 million and up to one billion people at additional risk – unless we act,” says lead author Tiem van der Deure, a PhD student at the Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences at the University of Copenhagen.

“The 200 million figure is a very conservative estimate assuming no demographic changes, but accounting for climate change. The one billion scenario includes significant population growth,” he explains.

If new areas become exposed to malaria, the consequences could be severe, as populations in these regions will lack experience in managing the disease and have very low immunity.

Different Mosquitoes React Differently

Because malaria is such a major problem in Africa, researchers have long studied how climate change affects the parasites mosquitoes transmit to humans. While climate change influences malaria in many ways – making the overall picture complex – this study shows that future climate conditions could favour several mosquito species capable of carrying malaria across much of Africa.

The researchers examined how six of the most widespread malaria mosquito species will respond to climate change.

“To most people, mosquitoes look alike. But they differ greatly – even if we sometimes can’t tell them apart with the naked eye. Their behaviour and preferred environments vary significantly,” says Associate Professor Anna-Sofie Stensgaard from the Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences at the University of Copenhagen and senior author of the study.

The team trained algorithms on thousands of mosquito observations and then used these models to predict where climate conditions will be suitable for different species – and how these conditions will shift as the climate changes.

“Of the six species we studied, three are projected to expand, while the other three do not decline significantly. Overall, this is a worrying trend,” says Tiem van der Deure.

Mosquito habitats are expected to grow especially in East and Central Africa, while conditions in West Africa will remain favourable.

Action Is Possible

Despite the grim outlook, something can be done, stresses Tiem van der Deure:

“Our climate scenarios show that we can prevent much of this by limiting climate change. We examined one scenario where we continue as usual, and another where we meet the Paris Agreement targets,” he says.

“This study is a stark reminder that failing to meet the Paris Agreement targets is not just about rising seas or extreme weather – it’s also a public health crisis in the making,” adds Professor David Nogués Bravo from the Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate at the University of Copenhagen and co-author of the study.

No threat to Northern Europa

According to the study, global health authorities must prepare for malaria to spread. With climate change, we can no longer assume mosquitoes will stay where they are, which could lead to outbreaks in new regions.

Even though Northern Europe is also getting warmer, there is no need for concern here, emphasizes Anna-Sofie Stensgaard:

“Malaria existed in Denmark in the past when the climate was much colder, and we still have malaria mosquitoes. But it remains too cold for the parasite to thrive. So malaria is not one of the mosquito-borne diseases I worry about reaching Denmark anytime soon. It’s also important to note that climate change is only part of the explanation for shifting disease patterns. Globalization, international trade, and land-use changes play at least as big a role,” she says.

According to Denmark’s Statens Serum Institut, around 80–100 malaria cases are imported to Denmark each year.

Read the study here. 

 

About Malaria
Malaria is the most severe mosquito-borne disease. In 2023, there were 263 million cases globally and 597,000 deaths. Malaria is caused by infection with a parasite transmitted to humans through mosquito bites. It occurs in most tropical and subtropical regions but is most prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa. Malaria can be completely cured with proper medication. (Source: WHO and Statens Serum Institut)

 

About the Study
The study was led by researchers at the University of Copenhagen in collaboration between the Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences and the Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate (Globe Institute). Lembris Laanyuni Njotto from the University of Dar es Salaam also contributed.

 

Old air samples hint at effects of climate change



Lund University





Through the DNA analysis of old air samples collected by the Swedish Armed Forces, researchers at Lund University in Sweden can show that spore dispersal of northern mosses has shifted over the past 35 years. It now starts several weeks earlier, revealing how quickly nature’s calendar can reset in line with a warmer climate.

When the Swedish military began collecting air samples in the 1960s to register radioactive fallout from nuclear weapons testing, it is highly unlikely that anyone was thinking about moss. However, the glass fibre filters on which the samples were saved also captured something completely unintended – namely DNA from pollen, spores and other biological particles. This discovery was made by researcher Per Stenberg of UmeÃ¥ University.

“The samples have proved to be an unexpected, unique and very exciting archive of DNA from wind-dispersed biological particles,” says Nils Cronberg, researcher in botany at Lund University. 

The researchers have studied how the dispersal period of airborne moss spores has changed over a 35-year period for 16 different moss species and groups. The results show that on average the spore dispersal of the mosses starts four weeks earlier and culminates six weeks earlier than in 1990.

“It’s a considerable difference, especially considering that summer is so short in the north,” says Nils Cronberg.

Warmer autumns mean that the mosses’ spore capsules have a longer time to develop before the onset of winter – a biological kick-start that enables the spores to be released earlier in the spring. But perhaps what is most surprising is that it is not the current spring weather that controls the timing of spore dispersal.

“We had expected that snow thaw or air temperature in the same year as spore dispersal would be crucial, but climate conditions the year before were shown to be the most important factor,” says Fia Bengtsson, formerly a researcher in botany at Lund University, who is now at the Norwegian Institute for Nature Research.

In addition to showing how fast climate change affects ecosystems, the study paves the way for a completely new method for understanding biological changes over time. The same type of DNA analysis can also be conducted for other plant and animal groups. As the collection points are all over Sweden, the researchers can follow developments back in time through the decades – from north to south.

“We anticipate that our results and knowledge about how nature has changed from the 1970s onwards will be part of the next report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) on the documented effects of climate change,” concludes Nils Cronberg.

 

ESMT Berlin study: Fractional-dose vaccines can save millions during shortages




Smaller, fractional doses of vaccines can significantly reduce infections during epidemics, especially when vaccine supply, delivery, or administration capacity is limited.



ESMT Berlin

Portrait Francis de Véricourt 

image: 

Francis de Véricourt, Professor of Management Science at ESMT Berlin and Joachim Faber Chair in Business and Technology, Academic Director of the DEEP - Institute for Deep Tech Innovation

view more 

Credit: ESMT Berlin, Photo: Bettina Ausserhofer





New research shows that using smaller, fractional doses of vaccines can significantly reduce infections during epidemics, especially when vaccine supply, delivery, or administration capacity is limited. The study provides the first analytical framework for determining when and how many vaccine doses should be fractionated to most effectively reduce infections and maximize public health impact.  

The paper, “When Should Fractional-dose Vaccines be Used?” by Francis de Véricourt, professor of management science and founding academic director of the DEEP - Institute for Deep Tech Innovation at ESMT Berlin, Jérémie Gallien (London Business School), and Naireet Ghosh (London Business School), has been accepted in the peer-reviewed journal Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. It combines epidemiology and operations research to evaluate vaccination strategies under real-world constraints. Using an epidemic simulation model integrated with an optimal control framework, the authors identify vaccination policies that minimize infections while accounting for limited stockpiles, delivery delays, and administration capacity. 

Their findings show that fractional-dose vaccines, those using less antigen per shot, can substantially reduce infections even when they are somewhat less effective than full doses. They are most valuable when vaccine stockpiles are scarce or delivery is slow, such as early in a pandemic or in low-resource settings, because smaller doses allow more people to be vaccinated faster. By contrast, when supply is ample or vaccination capacity is limited, full doses remain the better option. The optimal mix depends on both the efficacy gap between doses and the logistical constraints faced by health authorities. 

In two real-world case studies – the 2004–05 influenza season in the United States and Nigeria’s COVID-19 vaccination campaign – the researchers illustrate the potential scale of the effect. In the U.S. flu shortage, using fractional instead of full doses could have averted 64% more infections, or around 32 million additional cases. In Nigeria, where vaccine supply rates were the main bottleneck, the optimal fractional-dose strategy could have increased infections averted by 131%, preventing roughly 11 million more cases. The results show that fractional dosing can save millions when vaccines are scarce, but should be avoided once supply and delivery capacities are sufficient. 

“Fractional-dose vaccines can expand the reach of limited supplies,” says Francis de Véricourt. “Our work gives policymakers a clear framework to decide when smaller doses avert more infections and protect more people, especially when time and supply are scarce. Future health crises will require learning while acting, and our model can be extended to guide adaptive vaccination policies as new data emerge.” 

The study demonstrates that simplified strategies, such as using a single vaccine dosage throughout a campaign, can still achieve most of the benefits of the optimal, more complex policies. However, the researchers caution that the most effective approach depends strongly on local constraints such as manufacturing speed and distribution infrastructure.