Wednesday, December 03, 2025

Becoming human in southern Africa: What ancient hunter-gatherer genomes reveal





University of Johannesburg
Some of the earliest Homo sapiens genetic ancestry traced back to Southern African hunter-gatherers 

image: 

Mandible of a hunter-gatherer woman who lived 7900 years ago at Matjes River Rockshelter in the Western Cape, South Africa,  for whom a genome was reconstructed.

view more 

Credit: Photo by Helena Malmström.






In one of the largest African hunter-gatherer ancient-DNA studies to date, population geneticists from Uppsala University in Sweden, and a cognitive archaeologist from the University of Johannesburg, South Africa, analysed the DNA of 28 people who lived in southern Africa between 1200 and just a few hundred years ago. It contributes further evidence that southern African hunter-gatherers were some of the earliest human groups with a unique Homo sapiens genetic ancestry tracing back to about 300 000 years ago.

This could be done by peering behind the veil of recent migrations, providing a direct window into the region’s population history before large-scale movements that reshaped the continent's genetic landscape.

Some sapiens-specific adaptations from southern Africa

They found 490 modern human or Homo sapiens specific genetic variants in the ancient southern African hunter-gatherers. Amongst these, immune-system related genes and genes related to kidney function were prevalent.

“When we examine all human genetic variation and look for evolutionary changes on the Homo sapiens lineage, we surprisingly find adaptations of kidney-functions as one of the most dramatic changes. This adaptation may be related to human’s specific water-retention and body-cooling system, which give us special endurance”, says population geneticist Mattias Jakobsson.

Three variants – not specific to all humans, but to the ancient southern Africans – were also located in genes associated with UV-light protection, skin-diseases, and/or skin-pigmentation. Different from the rainforests of central Africa, southern African’s more open ecologies with little natural shade, likely made it important for human foragers to develop UV-light protection genetically.

Most genes have many different functions, and akin to immunity and UV-light protection traits, some behavioural and cognitive traits are also largely heritable. It is therefore noteworthy that more than 40% of the Homo sapiens-specific genetic variants found in the ancient southern African hunter-gatherers are also associated with neurons for brain growth and cognitive traits, or the way that human brains process information today.

Out of southern Africa

Southern Africa may have been an ecological refuge for humans since a cold phase almost 200 000 years ago. Here hunter-gatherers thrived, adapting to a diverse landscape rich in plant and animal resources.

It seems that these southern hunter-gatherers did not mix again with other Africans until after 1400 years ago. By that time, the DNA from eastern African pastoralists, and western African farmers became apparent in southern African populations.

The results from this new study differ from previous linguistic, archaeological, and some early genetic studies, that saw contemporary southern African Khoe and San as the descendants of a once-widespread population that extended across much of southern, eastern, and northeastern Africa.

Instead, it shows that some genetic adaptations for becoming human in Africa were unique to southern African hunter-gatherers who lived in a relatively large, stable population for many millennia south of the Limpopo River.

After about 100-70 000 years ago, small groups of southern African hunter-gatherers may have wandered northwards, carrying several of their genetic signatures and perhaps also techno-behaviours with them.

For Stone Age and cognitive archaeologist from the University of Johannesburg, Marlize Lombard, “this is a meaningful outcome, suggesting that the complex thinking and techno-behaviours such as making compound adhesives or bowhunting, observed in the southern African archaeological record from about 100 000 years ago originated locally, probably trickling northward with the genes of local hunter-gatherers from about 70 000 years ago”.

Are the descendants of ancient hunter-gatherers still among us?

From the Limpopo Province in the north to the south coast of the Western Cape, and from Ballito Bay in KwaZulu-Natal to Augrabies in the Northern Cape, these ancient people almost all shared genetic markers (such as the mitochondrial L0d haplogroup) that are inherited from a single maternal ancestor.

These markers are still found in sub-Saharan Africa, mostly in San or Bushman people such as the Ju/’hoan in Namibia and Botswana, and the Karretjie Mense of South Africa. To a lesser extent the markers are also present in the Coloured population of South Africa, as well as in some Afrikaans speaking south Africans of European descent (mostly French and Dutch), who started to live in the Cape during the 17th century.

Many of the people currently living in South Africa are therefore the descendants of the original hunter-gatherer population to a greater or lesser degree.

Early population history

What excites co-author, Carina Schlebush, most: “is that these genomes provide an unadmixed view of early southern African population history. With increasing numbers of high-coverage ancient genomes, we are now approaching true population-level insights. This gives us a much clearer foundation for understanding how modern humans evolved across Africa”. 

Researchers do not yet understand everything that contributed to becoming human in southern Africa, or elsewhere.

The genomes of ancient southern African hunter-gatherers as one of the earliest Homo sapiens groups to split from a common ancestor, however, has a lot to offer. It shows, amongst other things, that genetic variation may still be hidden in other ancient African forager groups, as well as indigenous peoples from elsewhere on the globe for whom there are little available genetic data. Such data is important for advancing our understanding of human evolution.

For lead-author Mattias Jakobsson: “These ancient genomes tell us that southern Africa played a key role in the human journey, perhaps ‘the’ key role”.

###

Notes to Editors

For email questions about this research, please contact Prof Marlize Lombard on Wed 3 Dec or Thurs 4 Dec at mlombard@uj.ac.za. News release written by Prof Marlize Lombard.

Funding

This project was funded by grants from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg foundation (to Mattias Jakobsson and to Carina Schlebush), the Swedish Research council (grant 2022-04642 to Mattias Jakobsson, grant 2023-02944 to Carina Schlebush) and South African National Research Foundation (African Origins Platform grant 98815 to Marlize Lombard).

Acknowledgements

Sequencing was performed at the SciLifeLab SNP&SEQ Technology Platform in Uppsala and the computations and data handling were enabled by resources provided by the National Academic Infrastructure for Supercomputing in Sweden (NAISS) at UPPMAX.

Sampling permits were obtained from the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA). We thank the staff at Bloemfontein Museum, the Florisbad Research Station and the School of Anatomical Sciences and Evolutionary Studies Institute, University of the Witwatersrand for facilitating work with the collections; the members of the Working Group of Indigenous Minorities in Southern Africa (WIMSA) and the South African San Council for their support and facilitating fieldwork for the collections that involved modern-day Khoe-San groups published previously, also used in this study. We thank our brilliant and long-term collaborator and co-author J. Brink who sadly passed away during the course of this project.


300,000-year old Homo sapiens genetic ancestry traced back to Southern African hunter-gatherers 


At a rock shelter 540km east of Cape Town, researchers traced back some of the earliest Homo sapiens genetic ancestry 

 

Thinking of Dry January? One month without alcohol linked to better sleep, mood and health, study finds



A new review of ‘Dry January’ from researchers at Brown’s School of Public Health and Warren Alpert Medical School finds even a short break from alcohol can boost health and help drinkers cut back for good



Brown University






With the new year on the horizon and resolutions brewing, more people are saying cheers to a booze-free January, a choice that might come with some real health benefits and, ultimately, help some people cut back for good.

Published in Alcohol and Alcoholism, the review from researchers at the Brown University School of Public Health and the Warren E. Alpert Medical School analyzed 16 studies on the popular month-long alcohol-free challenge known as ‘Dry January.’ Looking at over 150,000 participants, the review examined who takes part in Dry January, how they are affected, and what factors helped people succeed. The study, led by researchers at the Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies (CAAS), also identified how the campaign might expand and improve participation.

Researchers found that even a short-term pause in drinking can lead to meaningful physical and psychological improvements. Participants who cut out alcohol completely for the month reported improved sleep, better mood, weight loss and even healthier liver function and blood pressure. They were also more likely to say that they lost weight, were able to concentrate better and had more energy than they did before. Even those who simply reduced their drinking experienced some improvements in these areas.

“The effort leads to sustained moderation: most participants continue to drink less alcohol rather than increasing consumption afterwards,” said lead author Megan Strowger, who led the work as a CAAS postdoctoral fellow at the School of Public Health and is now a post-doctoral research associate at the University at Buffalo. “Overall, participating in Dry January allows people to pause, reflect and rethink their relationship with alcohol, including how it affects their social life, mental health and physical health.”

Dry January, which began in the U.K. in 2013, has grown steadily in popularity, going from 4,000 people officially registering on the campaign website in 2003, to millions of people now taking part in the challenge globally, according to the researchers.

The findings for the new study come at a time when research is shedding better light on the health risks of alcohol use and as an increasing number of people are drinking less. Data from a recent Gallup poll showed that only 54% of U.S. adults said they consumed alcohol, the lowest percentage in Gallup’s history collecting data on drinking behavior.

“There is so much more support for living an alcohol-free lifestyle now,” said Suzanne M. Colby, professor of behavioral and social sciences. “It is more socially acceptable than ever to be ‘sober curious’ or alcohol free. Social norms have shifted, in part with the help of influencers on social media sharing the benefits of sobriety and reducing the stigma of not drinking.”

Other findings from the study included: people who formally registered and used the campaign tools — such as the Try Dry app, daily coaching emails or text messages — were significantly more likely to complete the month alcohol-free and to continue drinking less afterward. 

Participants for Dry January tend to be younger, to be female, to have higher incomes and have a college degree, the research showed. Participants also tend to identify as heavier than average drinkers, which is typically a difficult group to reach through intervention programs, researchers said.

“This is a very good thing since drinking alcohol is so ingrained in our society,” said Matthew K. Meisel, assistant professor of behavioral and social sciences. Meisel says one of the biggest takeaways of the paper is that even participants who didn’t abstain completely still experienced benefits, including better mental health.

The review found some negative side effects of the challenge: A small number of participants who were unable to complete the month reported drinking more afterward in a so-called rebound effect.  

Still, the study’s authors recommend expanding outreach, partnering with diverse influencers and tailoring campaign messages for a wider audience. They also called for more U.S.-based research on both Dry January and Damp January — which calls for only cutting back on alcohol versus total abstinence — as well as greater investment in tools that help participants set goals, track progress and stay motivated.

“I think the most important takeaway from our Dry January review is that taking a break from drinking can be reframed as a positive experience,” Colby said. “I tried it myself and experienced benefits firsthand.”