Friday, January 16, 2026

Iran's internet shutdown hits 182 hours following massive protests

Iran's internet shutdown hits 182 hours following massive protests
NetBlocks records that the Iranian internet blackout has surpassed the blackout during the 2019 protests / CC: IRIB
By bnm Gulf bureau January 16, 2026

Iran's ongoing internet blackout has exceeded 182 hours of continuous disruption, surpassing the core duration of the 2019 shutdown, according to NetBlocks' monitoring data. 

Most Iranian government websites still exist and function over the "National Information Network" or local intranet, but foreign networks, users will only reliably see stubs or gated front pages for a handful of top‑level portals and state media mirrors, with the bulk of .ir government content effectively dark to the outside world at present.

The nationwide connectivity cut commenced on January 8, following twelve days of nationwide protests. Following the government’s internet crackdown, protests continued to swell across major cities, including Astara, Shiraz, Ketar, Isfahan, and the capital of Tehran.

On January 12, Iranian security forces reportedly escalated their crackdown by conducting house-to-house searches to confiscate satellite dishes and Starlink internet equipment, targeting the limited technological resources available to citizens for accessing external communications.

This prolonged blackout showcases the Iranian state's willingness to impose comprehensive digital isolation to suppress domestic unrest, even as it risks further alienating the population and attracting international condemnation.

According to calls attempted by bne IntelliNews on January 14, Iranian residents were entirely unreachable, though several reports indicate one-way calls to foreign telephone numbers remained possible.

Social messaging applications have been completely disabled, while Iranian newspapers face mixed outcomes: some remain entirely disconnected, while others have maintained a limited online presence through government-controlled internet networks.

The US Agency for Global Media has responded by expanding its broadcasting capabilities into Iran through a partnership with Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, complementing private sector efforts like Starlink to maintain information flows into the country.

According to reliable sources who recently left Iran, the Iranian government, using Russian scrambling technology imported from Belarus earlier in December have succesfully managed to scramble internet signals via geo-stationary satellites over Iranian cities. 

One Iranian website that has managed to stay online is the state-owned Press TV, which, citing the President of Iran’s National Centre for Cyberspace, Mohammad Amin Aghamiri, said the internet blackout will continue for the "time being."

He added that the exact timeline for lifting the restrictions will be announced once authorities have completed their security assessments.

“The time to return to normal conditions will be announced in the future, and authorities must certainly brief us on security considerations,” Aqamiri said, as quoted by the IRNA news agency.

The Iranian government has kept only a few websites online, including the President of Iran's website, Masoud Pezeshkian, and government news websites, including their Arabic and English-language services. 

English-language newspapers in Tehran continue to publish content, including the Tehran Times and Iran Daily, both owned by different sections of the Iranian state. However, due to the disconnection from the outside world, according to analytical data seen by IntelliNews, only a handful of readers inside Iran are seeing their content. 

Day 19 Of Iran Uprising: PMOI Reveals 50,000 Arrests As Internet Blackout Marks A Full Week – OpEd


Iran protests January 2026. Photo Credit: PMOI



By 


The nationwide uprising against the religious dictatorship in Iran has reached its nineteenth day on Thursday, January 15, 2026. Following a bloody eighteenth day, where the Judiciary Chief ordered “speedy” executions and the confirmed death toll surpassed 3,000, the regime has escalated its crackdown to unprecedented levels.

On Thursday, the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK) revealed shocking statistics regarding the scale of the regime’s repression, while the international community, from the G7 to former European leaders, rallied to support the Iranian people’s right to establish a democratic republic.

Day 19 Roundup: Over 50,000 arrests, drone surveillance, and global calls to blacklist IRGC

On Thursday, January 15, 2026, the nineteenth day of the uprising, the regime’s desperation became evident as arrest numbers soared and high-tech surveillance was deployed against unarmed protesters. Iran has now been in a full week of total internet blackout.

Key highlights from today include:

  • 50,000 Arrests: The PMOI/MEK announced that over 50,000 people have been arrested since the uprising began on December 28, with security forces conducting surprise raids on homes and workplaces.
  • Former EU Leaders’ Letter: Twelve former European leaders, including former Prime Ministers of Belgium, Greece, and Ireland, signed an open letter urging the EU to recognize the Iranian people’s right to resist tyranny and to blacklist the IRGC.
  • G7 Condemnation: Foreign Ministers of the G7 nations issued a joint statement strongly opposing the “brutal repression” and warning of additional restrictive measures.
  • Drones Hunting Civilians: Reports confirm the regime is using military-grade drones to identify, track, and arrest peaceful protesters, treating citizens as “enemy combatants.”
  • Call for UN Action: Mrs. Maryam Rajavi urged the immediate dispatch of an international fact-finding mission to visit the regime’s prisons, warning that the mullahs recognize no limits in their cruelty.

PMOI confirms 50,000 arrests; Mrs. Rajavi warns of “Khamenei’s desperation”


In a harrowing update on the scale of the state crackdown, the PMOI has confirmed that the number of detainees has exceeded 50,000 between December 28, 2025, and January 14, 2026. This figure is based on detailed investigations across 144 cities and inquiries in 76 others.

The arrests are being carried out through surprise raids on neighborhoods, homes, and workplaces. Mrs. Maryam Rajavi, President-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), described this mass incarceration as a sign of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s “desperation in the face of the people’s uprising.” She warned that the regime “will stop at no crime” to preserve its rule and called for an urgent international fact-finding mission to inspect the prisons.

The scale of these arrests echoes the 2022 uprising, where the regime’s Judiciary Chief eventually admitted to filing nearly 90,000 cases against protesters.

Former EU leaders to EU Presidency: Recognize right to resist, reject Shah and Mullahs

In a significant diplomatic development, 12 former European leaders—including former Prime Ministers of Belgium, Greece, Ireland, and the Czech Republic—sent an open letter to the leadership of the European Union.

The signatories urged the EU to “recognize the right of the Iranian people to resist tyranny and establish a democratic republic.” Crucially, the letter addressed the regime’s disinformation campaigns, clarifying that the Iranian people reject any return to the Pahlavi dictatorship. They cited the popular chant, “Down with the oppressor, be it the Shah or the Supreme Leader,” as proof that the people seek a future free of all dictatorships.
The leaders also called for the immediate blacklisting of the Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) as a terrorist organization.

Regime wages war with drones; G7 and US lawmakers condemn “barbaric tyranny”

Reports have emerged that the regime is treating its own citizens as enemy combatants by deploying military drone technology to identify and track peaceful protesters for arrest. This surveillance tactic highlights the militarization of the crackdown.

Meanwhile, international pressure is mounting. The G7 Foreign Ministers issued a joint statement condemning the “deliberate use of violence” and the killing of protesters. In the United States, lawmakers from both parties expressed solidarity. Senator Ted Cruz stated that “The people of Iran taking out their tyrannical regime would make America much, much safer,” while Senator Dave McCormick praised the courage of Iranians standing up to “barbaric tyranny.”

Global solidarity: Lawmakers from US to New Zealand stand with the uprising

As the regime attempts to hide its crimes behind a digital blackout, political figures from across the globe are breaking the silence, offering unwavering support to the Iranian people and condemning the mullahs’ brutality.

In New Zealand, Foreign Minister Winston Peters expressed that his government is “appalled by the escalation of violence and repression.” He condemned the killing of protesters and emphasized that Iranians have a fundamental right to peaceful protest and access to information. Peters also issued a stern warning to New Zealanders currently in Iran to “leave now.”

In the United States, support for the uprising remains bipartisan and vocal:

  • Senator Deb Fischer took to the Senate floor to reaffirm her solidarity with the Iranian people against the regime’s “flagrant economic mismanagement and brutal treatment.”
  • Rep. Nancy Mace highlighted the lethal nature of the crackdown, stating, “Thousands of Iranians murdered the last few days. Praying for their safe keeping tonight.”
  • Rep. Laura Friedman declared her stance with the protesters, noting they are simply asking for “freedom for themselves and future generations.”
  • Rep. Lois Frankel emphasized that the “suppression of fundamental rights anywhere threatens democracy everywhere,” pledging support for the students, women, and workers fighting the “murderous regime.”
  • Congressman Jim Himes praised the “enormous courage” of the people taking to the streets to fight for self-determination after years of tyranny.
  • Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi called for “forceful diplomacy and coordinated international pressure” to support those fighting for change, rejecting the regime’s response of mass killings.


Mahmoud Hakamian

Mahmoud Hakamian writes for The People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI), also known as Mujahedin-e-Khalgh (MEK)


Iran's regime crushing protests in bloody crackdown

Shabnam von Hein
DW
20 hours ago20 hours ago

Protesters are putting their lives on the line in Iran as the state mounts a coordinated and brutal response to the unrest. As the death toll grows, hopes of outside help seem faint.


Thousands of people are believed to have been killed in Iran, although exact numbers are impossible to verify
Image: Khoshiran/Middle East Images/picture alliance

The field in front of Tehran's Kahrizak Forensic Institute seems to be loaded with dead bodies. Amid widespread protests and a communications blackout, images of the site are only available in videos physically smuggled out of Iran or uploaded to the Internet via Starlink satellites.

"I would guess there are thousands dead, at any case," an eyewitness who recently visited Iran told DW.

The man described going to Kahrizak with a friend to identify and retrieve his friend's wife's body.

"On the previous evening, you could hear automatic gunfire in the part of the city I was visiting. My friend and his wife were at a protest. The wife was shot," he told DW.

It is impossible to know how many people have been killed in the Iranian protests, which started over two weeks ago. The internet has been down for days, and any communication with the outside world is severely limited.

An Iranian official told the Reuters news agency on Tuesday that some 2,000 people were dead. However, the Oslo-based Iran Human Rights organization reported a death toll of at least 3,379 people on Wednesday. Activists believe that the actual number of protesters killed across Iran is much higher.

The Iranian authorities also detained over 10,000 people in the latest wave of protests. Government critics are worried that many of the detainees could be put on show trials and sentenced to death.

Iran's regime wants to fast-track trials of protesters 03:21

Regime decries protesters as 'criminals'

Meanwhile, pro-regime media in Iran regularly label the protesters as "terrorists" and foreign agents. This week, Iranian Justice Minister Amin Hossein Rahimi referred to people arrested between January 8 and 11 as "criminals."
Iranian authorities don't rely only on the police to suppress the protests. The Basij — a volunteer paramilitary faction controlled by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) — was established specifically to deal with street protests. The IRGC itself is directly controlled by the country's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, with the main goal of protecting the Islamic Revolution and its achievements.

Basij militants attend religious indoctrination programs to ensure their commitment to the idea of morality preached by the regime. They have a reputation for being especially loyal to the political system and also provide Iran's hardliners with a stable voter base.


Is there any hope of reform in Iran?

"We have tried everything to achieve change in this system," religious scholar and journalist Mohammad Javad Akbarin told DW. Akbarin, who now lives in France, previously worked for 15 pro-reform papers in Iran and was arrested multiple times when he still lived in his home country.

He does not see any possibility of reforming the Iranian regime. Together with Nobel Prize laureate Shirin Ebadi and four other prominent government critics, he has demanded a US intervention in Iran.

"The protesters are stuck behind closed doors and under a digital blackout, without a realistic way of escaping this situation," he said. "As soon as the internet comes back online, we will see horrible images."


Trump says killing in Iran 'stopped'

The fact that protesters are willing to defy massive repression and still take to the streets shows the depth of popular discontent. At the same time, Iran's power structure is not showing visible cracks and fast, wide-reaching changes appear unlikely.

On Wednesday January 14, Donald Trump announced that "the killing in Iran is stopping, it's stopped." Trump cited "very important sources on the other side" and said there was "no plan for executions."

The comments came only a day after Trump urged Iranians to "keep protesting" and take over Iranian institutions, assuring them that "help is on its way."

Whether Trump is willing to actually help the protesters, and what kind of help he would be willing to provide, is anyone's guess.

Trump says he was told the 'killing in Iran is stopping'  06:07

Amnesty calls on UN Security Council to act

Human rights watchdog Amnesty International has called on the UN and its members to coordinate a response and prevent further bloodshed. This call also included an appeal to the UN Security Council to refer the situation in Iran to the International Criminal Court.

The US has called an emergency session of the Security Council on Thursday to discuss the deadly unrest in Iran. But any resolution or decision condemning Tehran is likely to be vetoed by China and Russia.

"We have seen this in similar cases, including Syria and Bashar Assad, despite hundreds of thousands of deaths," says lawyer Payam Akhavan.

The international law expert served as an adviser to the prosecutors working for international courts dealing with war crimes in former Yugoslavia and Rwanda.

"Under such circumstances, the focus should be on systematically gathering evidence and documents for future trials," he told DW. "The actual legal process can realistically only happen in a future democratic Iran."

The deadly repression meted out against protesters makes the prospects of democracy taking hold in Iran seem faint. But if Iran's recent history is anything to go by, brutally suppressing one uprising is not an effective way of averting the next one.

This article was originally written in German.

How Iran jammed Starlink (and how Iranians are trying to get around it)

After shutting down the internet, the Iranian government is now attempting to jam the Starlink satellite service made free to Iranians by the company. Iranians are now seeking ways to circumvent this latest wave of censorship.



Issued on: 14/01/2026 
By:  The FRANCE 24 Observers/Quang Pham

This map shows the level of GPS interference in Iran on January 8, 2026. © gpsjam.org

Iranian authorities cut the public's access to the internet and telephone communications on January 8. The networks were later partially reinstated, but with severe restrictions. The Iranian regime has been facing a series of protests since late December. In an attempt to crush the movement, the Iranian government also tried to break the last international communication link available to Iranians: Starlink.

Starlink, which provides internet access through a constellation of satellites, was thought to be out of the Iranian authorities' reach for censorship. However, in recent days, Starlink has been subject to a jamming campaign that has seriously impaired its use.
Can you get around this GPS jam?

GPS interference was observed in Tehran and surrounding regions on January 8, the day that the internet more widely was cut across Iran, according to the monitoring site gpsjam.org. Though we don’t know with certainty why this jamming occurred, it did partially affect Starlink’s service.

A significant level of GPS interference was identified in Tehran on January 8, 2026 (shown in red on the map). © gpsjam.org

A Starlink terminal usually needs GPS in order to establish a geographic location so as to communicate with the network’s satellites.

"[Starlink uses] the GPS position of the terminals to point their antennas towards the satellites," the people behind the X account @giammaiot2, a group of telecommunications researchers, told our team.

"Jamming GPS signals was the classic way to jam Starlink," Kave Salamatian, a professor at the University of Savoie in France, who specialises in the geopolitics of the internet, told our team. "But a Starlink update, which was added after Russia jammed signals in Ukraine and in the Black Sea, [now] enables users to bypass a GPS signal by relying on Starlink’s own satellites to identify a location using triangulation.”

This solution, which enables users to get around GPS interference, does have some limits, says Radim Badsi, CEO of the French company Ground Space, which specialises in satellite constellation surveillance. This can make Starlink users less mobile: “Starlink’s alternate [to establishing locations using GPS] constantly sweeps the sky to try to find a satellite that is passing by.”

But in this mode, the civilian version of a Starlink terminal can’t be used on the move, Badsi says.

‘Active interference’

The worsening of the Starlink connection observed in Iran in recent days has resulted in a data "packet loss of 30 to 80 percent", according to Victoria Samson, the Chief Director of Space Security and Stability at the Secure World Foundation, a Washington-based think tank. Savoie professor Kave Salamatian says that this loss likely comes from a more sophisticated form of jamming, an “active interference”.

Active interference involves saturating a satellite’s transmission channel. If you send “noise” or a fake signal to a satellite for long enough, then it is possible to disconnect its associated terminals.

"In theory, this could render the satellite unusable [for the terminal]. So you can just jam, one after another, all of the visible [Starlink] satellites," says Badsi.

But it is “technically quite difficult to jam Starlink’s main channel because the Starlink network is made up of multiple moving satellites”, says Oleg Kutkov, a Ukrainian engineer who is an expert in the Starlink network. He says, “directing a powerful noise beam directly to the satellite in the sky requires multiple large-dish antennas constantly tracking satellites. Russians tried this approach [in Ukraine], but the jammers were destroyed because it's hard to hide them.”

In an attempt to cut off access to the Starlink network, the Iranian government’s jammers are not only targeting Starlink satellites but also GPS navigation signals
. © X, @duncanstives

Technology that could be home-grown or imported from Russia

So how were Iranian authorities able to set up this level of interference?

The specialists who spoke to our team had a number of theories.

Iran does have in its arsenal Russian military jammers like the Murmansk-BN, which is able to interfere with GPS signals.

The experts behind the account @giammaiot2 think that the Cobra-V8, an Iranian electronic warfare system which is similar to the Russian-made 1RL257E Krasukha-4, might have been used to jam the transmission frequencies from Starlink terminals.

This is the Cobra-V8 Iranian electronic warfare system. Source: X

The Starlink interference may also have been created using civilian technology that is not necessarily foreign.

"The simplest explanation is that they did it internally. The Iranians have the skills to jam Starlink. All the more so because the interference we are currently seeing in Iran is different to what we saw in the war in Ukraine,” says Salamatian. "Iran has very good universities that are specialised in telecom like Imam Hossein University, which is the university for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, as well as Sharif University.”

‘Cat-and-mouse dynamic’

How exactly is this jamming impacting Starlink service in Iran?

Speaking to our team on condition of anonymity, a representative for Nasnet, the largest Starlink community in Iran, described a partial degradation of service:

“It is important to note first that disruptions to this service are not a new phenomenon. Similar issues were observed in Tehran approximately one month prior to the outbreak of the war between Iran and Israel in June 2025. Following that period, service remained stable until the past few days.

[...] What users are experiencing is better described as intermittent and non-persistent interference rather than a complete service outage. Connectivity remains available; however, at its peak, packet loss reached approximately 35 percent, resulting in frequent short disconnections and a noticeable degradation in user experience. Despite these conditions, the service has remained usable.

Based on our field assessments, these disruptions are geographically limited to Tehran. Starlink service in other parts of Iran has remained unaffected and continues to operate normally.”

The NasNet representative said Starlink users were able to temporarily bypass the jamming, thanks in part to the technical support provided by Starlink:


“A [Starlink] software update released on the second day of the disruptions [Editor’s note: on January 10] significantly reduced packet loss to approximately 10 percent. That said, network conditions remain unstable, with periodic fluctuations and occasional deterioration. This reflects an ongoing ‘cat-and-mouse’ dynamic in which both sides continuously adjust their technical approaches.”


On January 10, 2026, the X account @joinNASNET reported a significant improvement in Starlink service following a software update. Source: X

Thanks to this update of the firmware (the software powering Starlink terminals), Salamatian explains that "Starlink now has the ability, if a satellite is being jammed, to transfer the signal to another satellite. This allows internet traffic to be rerouted from a jammed satellite to another satellite. By doing so, they have successfully mitigated the impact of the jamming. Signal loss previously reached 70 percent due to jamming; it has now been reduced to 30 percent."

However, the Starlink network is no silver bullet for bypassing the regime’s orchestrated blackouts. According to Amir Rashidi, an Iranian digital rights expert, there are only 50,000 Starlink terminals in Iran, serving only a tiny fraction of the country’s 90 million inhabitants.

This article has been translated from the original in French by Brenna Daldorph.

How Important Is Iran For Russia’s War Effort? – Analysis

January 16, 2026 
 RFE RL
By Ray Furlong

Iran has been a major supplier of military equipment to Russia in recent years, especially since the Kremlin launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, but experts have told RFE/RL that this support no longer plays a key role in Moscow’s war effort.

Iranian missile sales to Russia, including air defense missiles and ballistic missiles, have totaled $2.7 billion since October 2021, according to a January 12 Bloombergreport citing an unnamed Western security official.

The volume of trade is not publicly disclosed by Moscow, and Iran denies supplying anything to Russia.

“So long as conflict persists between the parties, Iran will abstain from rendering any form of military assistance to either side,” Iran’s permanent mission to the United Nations said in a statement in May.

There is evidence to the contrary, particularly Russia’s widespread use of Iranian Shahed attack drones in the early stages of the full-scale war. But the value of this support now seems much diminished.


Drones

“Even though there’s still some transfers of Iranian drones, at least as late as last year, some newer drone designs that were still being transferred from Iran, I think we’ve long passed the peak of Iranian defense transfers to Russia,” Hanna Notte, Eurasia program chief at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, told RFE/RL on January 14.

Ruslan Suleymanov, an analyst at the New Eurasian Strategies Center, took a similar view.

“Russia is no longer as dependent on Iranian weapons as it was four years ago. The same Shahed drones are produced on Russian territory under the name Geran and…about 90 percent of the entire production cycle of those drones is already fully located in Russia, without Iran’s assistance,” he told Current Time on January 13.

Iran provided Russia with technology and training, and a plant at Alabuga in Russia’s Tatarstan region is churning out Gerans.

According to Ukraine, Russia produces some 5,000 long-range drones of various types each month. This includes the Geran strike drone and the Gerbera, a drone without a warhead used as decoy to saturate Ukraine’s air defenses.


Missiles


In April, General Christopher Cavoli, head of US Central Command at the time, told the US Senate Armed Services committee that “Iran also continued its material support for Russia, donating over 400 short-range ballistic missiles and hundreds of thousands of artillery shells.”

In May, Reuters reported Iran would also send Fath-360 missile launchers, although Tehran denied this. Previously, in September 2024, Pentagon spokesman Pat Ryder said Fath 360 missiles had been delivered.

That was followed in October 2024 by US sanctions on two Russian shipping companies for delivering drone equipment and munitions across the Caspian Sea for use in Ukraine.

“The Department of State is taking action today to constrain further Iran’s destabilizing activities, including its transfer of ballistic missiles to Russia,” a statement said.

The European Union followed suit days later with sanctions on three Iranian airlines and two procurement firms “following Iran’s missile and drone transfers to Russia.”

But there have been no reports of Fath 360 being used in Ukraine. Notte said this may be because the Fath 360 launchers were never delivered or Russia didn’t need to use them as it ramped up domestic production and took deliveries from North Korea.

A report in February last year by RUSI, a London-based think tank, noted Russia’s Defense Ministry planned to produce some 750 ballistic and 560 cruise missiles in 2025. Since then, Ukrainian military intelligence has made higher estimates of output.

“The Russians may just simply not have needed to use these Iranian missiles,” Notte said.


Munitions


Iran is estimated to have sent extensive supplies of ammunition and shells to Russia since 2022. A Wall Street Journal investigation in 2023 put the numbers at 300,000 artillery shells and around 1 million rounds of ammunition.

Ukrainian drone strikes in 2025 suggested military supplies were continuing. In April, Russian media reported the first attacks on the Caspian port of Olya, followed by reports of further strikes in August.

Olya has been identified a major hub for shipments of Iranian military supplies.

A report by the Kyiv School of Economics last year detailed volumes of explosives being transported by ship and rail from both Iran and North Korea. It said North Korean supplies now made up 58 percent of Russia’s explosives imports.

Notte said that, likewise, North Korean shells and bullets had eclipsed Iranian supplies in scale.

“The Ukrainians estimated last year that 50 percent of all the ammunition that Russia used in Ukraine was DPRK (North Korea). So, my sense here is that once the DPRK came in as a major defense supply to Russia, there was just probably not a need to get Iranian ammunition,” Notte said.


Ray Furlong is a Senior International Correspondent for RFE/RL. He has reported for RFE/RL from the Balkans, Kazakhstan, Georgia, and elsewhere since joining the company in 2014. He previously worked for 17 years for the BBC as a foreign correspondent in Prague and Berlin, and as a roving international reporter across Europe and the former Soviet Union.

RFE/RL journalists report the news in 21 countries where a free press is banned by the government or not fully established.

Thousands flee Aleppo area amid heightened tensions over Kurdish SDF

dpa 16.01.2026

Photo: Moawia Atrash/dpa

Thousands of people have fled the eastern areas surrounding Aleppo as they seek to escape further fighting between government troops and the predominantly Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), authorities said on Friday.

Officials said around 4,000 people have left the towns of Deir Hafir and Maskana.

Heavy fighting broke out last week in Kurdish-controlled districts of Aleppo amid a dispute over plans to integrate the previously autonomous Kurdish administrations into the state system.

The transitional government eventually brought the Kurdish neighbourhoods of Aleppo under its control.

Government forces are now seeking to push SDF fighters further east, where they still control large parts of the country.

During Syria's civil war, the SDF was regarded as the United States' most important ally in the fight against Islamic State.

An agreement on integrating the SDF into the state armed forces following the overthrow of long-time ruler Bashar al-Assad has so far not been implemented.

The government announced a "humanitarian corridor" for several towns east of Aleppo to allow civilians to leave by Friday afternoon.

According to eyewitnesses who spoke to a dpa reporter on the ground, SDF fighters prevented people from leaving the areas in some cases.

The transitional government under President Ahmed al-Sharaa accuses the SDF of tolerating Assad loyalists and members of the banned Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) within its ranks.

Kurdish representatives, in turn, distrust assurances by al-Sharaa, the former leader of the Islamist group HTS, that their rights will be protected. They also warn of a possible resurgence of Islamic State.


For Syria’s new rulers, Sunni clans hold the key to stability – and ending sectarian strife

Headed by a close ally of Syria’s President Ahmed al-Sharaa, the recently established Office of Tribes and Clans aims to ease tensions within the country’s Sunni majority, divided between former rebels, those who once sided with the Assad regime, and others in the ranks of the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces. FRANCE 24’s Wassim Nasr has gained exclusive access to a crucial link in the Syrian reconciliation process.



Issued on: 15/01/2026
FRANCE24
By: Wassim NASR


A view of Aleppo, Syria's second-largest city, where sectarian tensions underscore the huge challenges facing the country's new rulers. © Wassim Nasr, FRANCE 24

Renewed clashes between Syrian security forces and Kurdish fighters in the Aleppo region are a reminder of the volatile communal and sectarian tensions that continue to roil the country more than a year after the fall of the Assad dynasty.

The latest violence follows weeks of deadly clashes last summer pitting Bedouin tribesmen against Druze militias in the country’s south, and after the massacre of Alawite civilians in their western heartland in March and April of last year. 

Each bout of violence underscores the daunting challenge facing Syria’s new rulers as they grapple with the complex, fragile ethnoreligious mosaic of a country ravaged by more than a decade of civil war and riven with bitter divides. 

While the focus is on Syria’s vulnerable minorities, the country’s Sunni majority  –  itself divided along tribal lines and past opposition or allegiance to the Assads – holds the key to stabilising the country and staving off further sectarian strife. 

With that aim in mind, the Syrian presidency set up an “Office of Tribes and Clans” in September headed by Jihad Issa al-Sheikh, also known by his nom de guerre Abu Ahmed Zakour, a longtime fellow traveller of Syria's rebel-turned-president Ahmed al-Sharaa. 

FRANCE 24’s Wassim Nasr was able to meet with al-Sheikh and other members of the office at its three regional branches in Aleppo, Hama and Idlib, gaining exclusive insight into a body that aims to play a key role in the Syrian reconciliation process. 
In Aleppo, old grudges and shifting alliances

Strategically placed alongside Aleppo's Bureau of political affairs, the local branch of the Office of Tribes and Clans has moved into the former premises of the Baath party that ruled Syria for decades under the Assads.  

Its task is to maintain the non-aggression pact between Syria’s former rebels and the Sunni militias that had previously backed the Assad regime, before switching sides during the lightening offensive led by Sharaa’s Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) in November 2024.  

It was their change of allegiance that led to the fall of Aleppo, Syria’s economic capital, in just three days, hastening the end of Assad rule.  

The largest of these militias, the al-Baqir Brigade, had previously received funding from the Iranian Revolutionary Guards and was entrusted with conscripts from the Syrian regular army. This effectively gave them the power of life and death over local inhabitants. 

“The rebels in Aleppo came from the same (Sunni) neighbourhoods (as the militiamen),” said a witness from the early days of the Syrian revolution in 2011, who traced existing rancours to a notorious incident involving a family accused of siding with the Assads.  

“The discord began when the head of the Meraai family and one of his sons were executed and their mutilated bodies displayed in public for several days,” added the witness, describing their killing as a response to the shooting of anti-Assad demonstrators. 

A lynchpin of the al-Baqir Brigade, the Meraai family was widely seen as a tool of the Assad regime to suppress opponents – not necessarily acting on direct orders from Damascus, but rather to preserve its financial interests and the favours granted by the regime.  

Sitting on a plastic chair amid the ruins, a Meraai family member who was imprisoned at the time had a different take on the incident. He said the executions “were unjustified because we simply don’t know who fired at demonstrators from the rooftops”. 


A destroyed building in the al-Salihin neighbourhood of Aleppo. 
© Wassim Nasr, FRANCE 24

Fifteen years on from that fateful incident, his brothers Khaled and Hamza would play a key role in the liberation of Aleppo by Sharaa’s rebel coalition. After more than two years of negotiations and a visit to Sharaa’s bastion in Idlib, Khaled al-Meraai was persuaded by his fellow Bagara clansman Jihad Issa al-Sheikh that the time had come to abandon the Assads. 

Seeing the tide turning, Khaled al-Meraai agreed to secretly harbour an HTS commando unit that would attack a strategic command centre of the Syrian army in Aleppo. Months before the battle, scouts had infiltrated the city to prepare the ground, including Jihad Issa al-Sheikh's own brother, Abu Omar. 

But this crucial role in the liberation of Aleppo has not erased, at least in the eyes of the early rebels, the Sunni family’s earlier participation in the Assad regime’s repressive apparatus. As the former inmate put it, “our relatives will flee the city, fearing revenge, if they don't see me sitting in my chair here every day”. 

While the Meraais still own valuable properties, including a stud farm for purebred Arabian horses, they have been forced to return some of the assets that were confiscated from former rebels. The new Syrian authorities are protecting the family, but without publicly acknowledging the deal that helped bring about the capture of Aleppo  –  even though Hamza al-Meraai was recently photographed with an interior ministry spokesperson in Damascus. 

The Meraai family's stud farm in Aleppo. © Wassim Nasr, FRANCE 24


In addition to Sunni reconciliation, the sprawling multi-faith city faces formidable security challenges. On New Year's Day, a member of the internal security forces was killed while preventing a suicide bomber from attacking a Christian celebration. His funeral was attended by senior officials including the interior minister  as well as representatives of Aleppo’s Christian churches. 

A few kilometres north of the city, residents of the Shiite villages of Nubl and Zahra live under heavy protection from the Syrian army. As soon as Aleppo was captured in late 2024, the villages sent representatives to the city to obtain security guarantees. Once again, Jihad Issa al-Sheikh, the presidential adviser, acted as mediator. Since then, “there has been only one murder”, said a local representative in Nubl.  “In the early days, the local (HTS) commander slept here on the floor to ensure that there would be no abuses.” 

But the situation remains precarious for the Shiite villagers, who are mindful that nearby Sunni villages are still in ruins. “Our [Sunni] neighbours see that we are protected, while they are unable to rebuild their villages and are still living in tents,” said the Nubl resident. “One can imagine and understand what they are going through.” 

Clan leaders gather in Damascus 

On December 9, the Damascus home of Sheikh Abdel Menaam al-Nassif, an early supporter of the Syrian revolution,  hosted a high-level meeting of clan representatives from across the country, presenting the Office of Clans and Tribes with an ideal platform to send a message.  

Addressing the assembly of senior clansmen, Jihad Issa al-Sheikh said the office was “not designed to command you or replace you, but rather to serve as a direct line to President Sharaa”. He then issued an advice to clans tarnished by collaboration with the deposed regime. 

“Those clans that were on Assad’s side should keep a low profile and put forward figures who have not been compromised. We need everyone,” he added. “We must turn the page on old quarrels once and for all by supporting the state and not being a source of destabilisation.” 


Jihad Issa al-Sheikh (left), a key Sharaa aide and head of the Office of Tribes and Clans, attends a meeting in Damascus in December 2025 
© Wassim Nasr, FRANCE 24


Referring to recent sectarian classes, the top Sharaa aide said it was “unacceptable for clans to take up arms at the slightest incident or to join the ranks of our enemies for one reason or another”. 

He added: “We must rise to the challenges we have faced since the liberation of the country.” 

General Hamza al-Hmidi, the head of operations for the Syrian armed forces, then spoke of the deadly summer clashes in Sweida, which saw Bedouin tribesmen converge on the southern province to fight local Druze militias, and led Israel to intervene militarily with strikes on security forces deployed to quell the bloodshed. 

“We were faced with militiamen firing at us at the front and with killers and looters in our wake. These actions, which do not reflect our values, gave (the Israelis) a pretext to bomb us, forcing us to leave the city in the hands of (Druze) militiamen,” lamented the young general. 

The meeting touched on the sensitive subject of cronyism and political appointments, with clan leaders urged to present qualified candidates for administration jobs and the future National Assembly – and to refrain from promoting themselves or their relatives. The message was that the Baath party ways of coopting tribal and clan leaders through clientelism would no longer be accepted. 

The meeting, attended by two representatives of Syria’s new political bureau, led to animated debate. The idea of a "Council of Elders" composed of clan leaders was put forward – a means to preserve their status and influence while separating their role from that of political institutions.  

It’s a delicate balance for Syria’s new rulers, for whom gaining the support of clans necessarily means making concessions, including material ones, particularly in areas that are still outside Damascus’s control. 

Preventing vendettas in Hama and Homs 

The office’s Hama branch had its baptism of fire in the wake of two particularly grisly murders in nearby Homs, which kicked off attacks on Alawite neighbourhoods. Its primary mission was clear: to ease tensions in Syria’s third most populous city.  

In the days following the murders, representatives of various clans acted quickly to prevent an escalation, under the coordination of Sharaa’s adviser al-Sheikh. The investigation revealed that the murders of a married couple, initially presented as sectarian, were in fact an internal family affair. A joint letter from community leaders helped to tamp down reprisals and narrowly avert bloodshed. 

Sheikh Abu Jaafar Khaldoun, head of the Hama office, stressed the importance of inter-community dialogue. “We need to start from scratch and rebuild neighbourly relations,” he said. “This involves simple gestures, such as attending funerals.” 

Khaldoun said interactions with the Alawite, Ismaili and Christian communities helped to defuse tensions after rebel forces took over Hama and then Homs. 

‘We wasted no time after liberation, for fear of reprisals between communities, and even within each community,” he explained. “The first few months were tense, and some people took advantage of the situation to settle old scores.” 
In Idlib, a laboratory for reconciliation 

A rebel bastion and launchpad for the lighting offensive that toppled Assad, northwestern Idlib province has also served as a model for the type of conflict resolution advocated by Syria's new leaders. 

Starting in 2017, Sharaa’s HTS began to work with local clans with a pragmatic goal:  to resolve conflicts between rival factions in areas outside the regime's control, drawing on clan ties shared both by residents and the province’s large number of internally displaced people. After a series of military setbacks in 2019, the clans were gradually integrated as a supporting force for HTS and the "Syrian Salvation Government" that administered the rebel holdout.  

This dual experience, both military and mediatory, is the foundation of the new Office of Clans and Tribes, whose leaders are largely drawn from the ranks of Idlib’s displaced population. 


A tent used by the head of the office's Idlib branch in the northwestern province. 
© Wassim Nasr, FRANCE 24


A key role of the office’s local branch is to maintain a link between the new Syrian authorities and displaced people from eastern Syria. The latter include both the clans based in areas controlled by the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) and displaced people from Raqqa, Hassaka or Deir ez-Zor – populations often buffeted by war, forced displacement and shifting alliances.   

Efforts to tilt the tribal balance have weighed heavily in recent military realignments. Most recently in Aleppo and months before in nearby Manbij, shifts in clan alliances have facilitated the recapture of entire neighbourhoods previously held by Kurdish forces, illustrating the decisive role played by Jihad Issa al-Sheikh and his office in reshaping the balance of power on the ground. 

For the new regime, the stakes are primarily political and security-related. The eastern provinces provide most of the SDF's recruits while at the same time constituting a potential breeding ground for jihadist groups. To alienate them once more would be to repeat the mistakes that in the past pushed certain clans into the arms
 of the Assad regime, Kurdish forces or the Islamic State (IS) group. 

Reassuring the Sunni majority and healing the deep divides left by years of war is a matter of survival for the new Syrian authorities. Lasting stability can only come from internal dynamics, driven by Syrians themselves. In this context, the Office of Tribes and Clans holds a key place at the intersection of community tensions and the most sensitive security issues. The stated objective is not to marginalise the clans, but to integrate them as actors of stabilisation. 

The authorities are claiming a number of results since the office’s creation, including de-escalation in Homs, the management of protests in coastal areas home to many Alawites, and a gradual decline in assassinations targeting former members of the Assad regime. Despite the recent deadly clashes in Aleppo, the ability to prevent a major escalation in fighting over sensitive neighbourhoods previously held by Kurdish factions is also presented as concrete illustration of this new approach. 

This article was translated from the original in French.
‘All Lies’: Gazans Say There’s No Ceasefire as Phase 2 Begins Amid Israeli Strikes

“Where is the ceasefire?” asked the father of a teenage girl killed in an Israeli strike on their family home.



A Palestinian child wounded by an Israeli airstrike on the Nuseirat refugee camp receives treatment in Gaza City on January 15, 2026.
(Photo by Hassan Jedi/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Brett Wilkins
Jan 16, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Authorities in Gaza said Friday that Israeli forces killed or wounded dozens of Palestinians within the past 24 hours amid widespread skepticism over the Trump administration’s announcement that the second phase of what many in the coastal strip say is essentially a sham ceasefire has begun.

The newly formed Gaza Administration Committee met Friday for the first time in Cairo, where members discussed immediate humanitarian relief and reconstruction plans for the obliterated strip. The body is an integral part of Phase 2 of US President Donald Trump’s 20-point peace plan for Gaza, which US special envoy Steve Witkoff said began on Wednesday.



With Global Attention on Venezuela, Israel Intensifies Assault on Gaza, Lebanon



House Dems Call Out Israel’s ‘Near-Daily Violations’ of Gaza Ceasefire

Trump said Thursday that his so-called Board of Peace to oversee Gaza has also been formed. In a post on his Truth Social network, Trump touted the body as “the Greatest and Most Prestigious Board ever assembled at any time, any place.”

The Gaza Administration Committee is chaired by former Deputy Palestinian Planning Minister Ali Shaath, who said during a Friday press conference that “our goal is to give the Palestinian people hope that there is a future” and bring “smiles to the faces of Gaza’s children, women, and men.”

However, Israeli bombs and bullets continued to claim Palestinian lives across the strip, including women and children, in the latest of what Gaza officials say are more than 1,200 violations of the three-month ceasefire. At least 463 Palestinians have been killed and more than 1,250 others wounded since the tenuous truce took effect on October 10, according to the Gaza Health Ministry.

“Where is the ceasefire?” asked the father of a teenage girl killed in an Israeli strike on their family’s home in Deir al-Balah in central Gaza. “We are civilians in our homes, and we are dying.”

Another Gaza resident, Jaber Mohammed, called the ceasefire process “all lies.”

“We’ve been suffering for two years and now starting the third,” Mohammed told Al Jazeera Friday. “We’re suffering from the lack of food and drink, and from high prices.”

Yet another Gazan, Fayeq al-Helou, said: “They haven’t even started the first phase yet. How can they start the second?”

“We don’t want it to be like every other time, just words on paper,” he added.



In addition to ongoing air and ground strikes, Israel has continued to block humanitarian aid from entering Gaza, where widespread hunger and illness are rampant among the nearly 2 million forcibly displaced Palestinians, many of whom are living in tents and other makeshift shelters unfit for human habitation. Gaza’s Interior Ministry says that at least 31 people—some of them children and infants—have died in the strip due to exposure to cold, flooding, and shelter collapse amid winter storms.

Since the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack, Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza has left more than 250,000 Palestinians dead, wounded, or missing.

Hamas, which has governed Gaza since 2007, said Thursday that it welcomes the new administration committee. Bassem Naim, a member of Hamas’ political bureau, said that “the ball is now in the court” of the United States.

Trump said Thursday that Hamas must “immediately” return the body of the final Israeli hostage abducted in October 2023 “and proceed without delay to full demilitarization.”

“They can do this the easy way, or the hard way,” the president added.

Hamas has committed to dissolving Gaza’s existing government and yield to the administration committee, although the group has been vague about how and when it would disarm, and maintains its “right to resist” Israel’s occupation.