Saturday, January 24, 2026

SCI-FI-TEK 70 YRS IN THE MAKING

PPPL launches STELLAR-AI platform to accelerate fusion energy research



A new computing platform that pairs artificial intelligence (AI) with high performance computing aims to end the bottleneck holding back fusion energy research by speeding the simulations needed to advance the field.



Princeton University

A colorized photograph of the inside of NSTX-U. 

image: 

A colorized photograph of the inside of NSTX-U.

view more 

Credit: PPPL Communications Department




A new computing platform that pairs artificial intelligence (AI) with high performance computing aims to end the bottleneck holding back fusion energy research by speeding the simulations needed to advance the field. 

The project — known as the Simulation, Technology, and Experiment Leveraging Learning-Accelerated Research enabled by AI (STELLAR-AI ) — will be led by the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL). STELLAR-AI will expand far beyond the Lab’s walls, however, bringing together national laboratories, universities, technology companies and industry partners to build the computational foundation the fusion community needs.

It can take months to run a single high-fidelity computer simulation or to train an artificially intelligent (AI) system capable of designing an ideal fusion system using existing infrastructure. STELLAR-AI is designed to reduce that timeline by using artificial intelligence. The platform connects computing resources directly to experimental devices, including PPPL's National Spherical Torus Experiment-Upgrade (NSTX-U), which is scheduled to go live this year, allowing researchers to analyze data as experiments occur.

Building the Computational Foundation for Fusion

Jonathan Menard, deputy director for research at PPPL, sees STELLAR-AI as a cornerstone of the U.S. fusion ecosystem: a dedicated, AI-driven research environment built specifically for the fusion energy mission. STELLAR-AI will pair speed with precision, accelerating the path to commercially viable fusion power.

“Fusion is a complex system of systems. We need AI and high performance computing to really optimize the design for economic construction and operation,” said Menard. "We want to link simulation technology and experiments — in particular, NSTX-U — with AI and partnerships to get to accelerated fusion.”

STELLAR-AI will achieve this goal by integrating CPUs, GPUs and QPUs in an ideal  configuration of hardware for tackling the challenges facing private fusion companies as they race to bring a solution to market. CPUs, or central processing units, are standard computer chips that handle everyday computing tasks. GPUs, or graphics processing units, are specialized chips that excel at the parallel calculations needed for artificial intelligence. QPUs, or quantum processing units, use the principles of quantum physics to solve certain complex problems that would take traditional computers far longer to complete.

A critical part of the Genesis Mission

STELLAR-AI is part of the Genesis Mission, a national effort launched by executive order in November 2025 to use AI to speed up scientific discovery across DOE laboratories. 

"The Genesis platform is an integrated, ambitious system that will bring together the various unique DOE assets: experimental and user facilities, the supercomputers, data archives and, importantly, the AI models," said Shantenu Jha, head of PPPL's Computational Sciences Department. While Genesis provides that broad infrastructure, STELLAR-AI contributes fusion-specific computer codes, data and scientific models back into the national system. The project also aligns with the DOE's Fusion Science and Technology Roadmap, which calls for building an AI-Fusion Digital Convergence platform to accelerate commercialization of a fusion power plant, achieve U.S. energy dominance, and provide the abundant power needed to drive the next generation of AI and computing.

Researchers plan to use STELLAR-AI for projects that span simulation, design and real-time experiment support. One effort will create a digital twin of NSTX-U: a computer model that mirrors the physical machine so closely that scientists can test ideas virtually before running actual experiments. Another project, called StellFoundry, uses AI to speed the design of stellarators, a type of fusion device with a twisted, pretzel-like shape that some scientists believe could offer advantages over other designs. Stellarator design requires sifting through enormous amounts of data to find the best configurations, a process that traditionally takes months or years and will greatly benefit from the STELLAR-AI platform. 

A Network of Public and Private Partners

The strength of STELLAR-AI lies in PPPL’s partnerships with DOE National Laboratories, AI and HPC companies, academic institutions, as well as fusion and engineering companies. The team includes world-leading capabilities from national laboratories, including PPPL and UKAEA as well as top universities such as Massachusetts Institute of Technology and University of Wisconsin-MadisonPrinceton University, which manages the laboratory for the U.S. DOE's Office of Science, is also a key partner.  Princeton will support operations, research software engineering, and user training for the STELLAR-AI infrastructure. Crucial technical support comes from tech giants like NVIDIA which is providing expertise to improve the performance of several critical fusion codes, and Microsoft, which will federate Azure’s leading cloud capabilities. We also have direct collaboration with the fusion industry, including Commonwealth Fusion SystemsGeneral AtomicsType One Energy and Realta Fusion. This unique combination of partners will deliver proven AI models and key tools for the U.S. fusion industry.

STELLAR-AI is just one of several initiatives that position PPPL as a hub for public-private collaboration in fusion energy. The laboratory's seven decades of plasma research, combined with experimental facilities like NSTX-U and computational expertise, have made it a destination for companies and research institutions seeking to accelerate fusion development. 


PPPL is mastering the art of using plasma — the fourth state of matter — to solve some of the world’s toughest science and technology challenges. Nestled on Princeton University’s Forrestal Campus in Plainsboro, New Jersey, our research ignites innovation in a range of applications including fusion energy, nanoscale fabrication, quantum materials and devices, and sustainability science. The University manages the Laboratory for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science, which is the nation’s single largest supporter of basic research in the physical sciences. Feel the heat at https://energy.gov/science and https://www.pppl.gov.  

 

Adoption of electric vehicles tied to real-world reductions in air pollution, study finds



Using satellite data, Keck School of Medicine of USC researchers reported the first statistically significant decrease in nitrogen dioxide linked to zero-emissions vehicles





Keck School of Medicine of USC




When California neighborhoods increased their number of zero-emissions vehicles (ZEV) between 2019 and 2023, they also experienced a reduction in air pollution. For every 200 vehicles added, nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) levels dropped 1.1%. The results, obtained from a new analysis based on statewide satellite data, are among the first to confirm the environmental health benefits of ZEVs, which include fully electric and plug-in hybrid cars, in the real world. The study was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health and just published in The Lancet Planetary Health.

While the shift to electric vehicles is largely aimed at curbing climate change in the future, it is also expected to improve air quality and benefit public health in the near term. But few studies have tested that assumption with actual data, partly because ground-level air pollution monitors have limited spatial coverage. A 2023 study from the Keck School of Medicine of USC using these ground-level monitors suggested that ZEV adoption was linked to lower air pollution, but the results were not definitive.

Now, the same research team has confirmed the link with high-resolution satellite data, which can detect NO₂ in the atmosphere by measuring how the gas absorbs and reflects sunlight. The pollutant, released from burning fossil fuels, can trigger asthma attacks, cause bronchitis, and increase the risk of heart disease and stroke.

“This immediate impact on air pollution is really important because it also has an immediate impact on health. We know that traffic-related air pollution can harm respiratory and cardiovascular health over both the short and long term,” said Erika Garcia, PhD, MPH, assistant professor of population and public health sciences at the Keck School of Medicine and the study’s senior author.

The findings offer support for the continued adoption of electric vehicles. Over the study period, ZEV registrations increased from 2% to 5% of all light-duty vehicles (a category that includes cars, SUVs, pickup trucks and vans) across California, suggesting that the potential for improving air pollution and public health remains largely untapped.

“We’re not even fully there in terms of electrifying, but our research shows that California’s transition to electric vehicles is already making measurable differences in the air we breathe,” said the study’s lead author, Sandrah Eckel, PhD, associate professor of population and public health sciences at the Keck School of Medicine.

Tracking neighborhood air quality

For the analysis, the researchers divided California into 1,692 neighborhoods, using a geographic unit similar to zip codes. They obtained publicly available data from the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles on the number of ZEVs registered in each neighborhood. ZEVs include full-battery electric cars, plug-in hybrids and fuel-cell cars, but not heavier duty vehicles like delivery trucks and semi-trucks.

Next, the research team obtained data from the Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI), a high-resolution satellite sensor that provides daily, global measurements of NO₂ and other pollutants. They used this data to calculate annual average NO₂ levels in each California neighborhood from 2019 to 2023.

Over the study period, a typical neighborhood gained 272 ZEVs, with most neighborhoods adding between 18 and 839. For every 200 new ZEVs registered, NO₂ levels dropped 1.1%, a measurable improvement in air quality.

“These findings show that cleaner air isn’t just a theory—it’s already happening in communities across California,” Eckel said.

Electric vehicles and public health

To confirm that these results were reliable, the researchers conducted several additional analyses. They accounted for pandemic-related changes as a contributor to NO₂ decline, such as excluding the year 2020 and controlling for changing gas prices and work-from-home patterns. The researchers also confirmed that neighborhoods that added more gas-powered cars saw the expected rise in pollution. Finally, they replicated their results using updated data from ground-level monitors from 2012 to 2023.

“We tested our analysis in many different ways, and the results consistently support our main finding,” Garcia said.

These results show that TROPOMI satellite data—which covers nearly the entire planet—can reliably track changes in combustion-related air pollution, offering a new way to study the effects of the transition to electric vehicles and other environmental interventions.

Next, Garcia, Eckel and their team are comparing data on ZEV adoption with data on asthma-related emergency room visits and hospitalizations across California. The study could be one of the first to document real-world health improvements as California continues to embrace electric vehicles.

About this research

In addition to Garcia and Eckel, the study’s other authors are Futu Chen, Sam J. Silva and Jill Johnston from the Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California; Daniel L. Goldberg from the Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University; Lawrence A. Palinkas from the Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego; and Alberto Campos and Wilma Franco from the Southeast Los Angeles Collaborative.

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [R01ES035137, P30ES007048]; the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Health and Air Quality Applied Sciences Team [80NSSC21K0511]; and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Atmospheric Composition Modeling and Analysis Program [80NSSC23K1002].

 

Why wetland restoration needs citizens on the ground




Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences
Roadmap for scaling citizen science in wetland restoration. 

image: 

Roadmap for scaling citizen science in wetland restoration. The figure illustrates the progression from current approaches, where citizen science remains fragmented and marginal, to emerging capacities enabled by technological, social, and institutional advances, and finally toward integration into formal monitoring and adaptive management frameworks. This pathway highlights how citizen science can be scaled into credible and enduring infrastructure, closing spatial, temporal, and institutional gaps that constrain wetland restoration monitoring and long-term success.

view more 

Credit: Environmental Science and Ecotechnology





Wetland restoration is expanding worldwide, but long-term success often remains uncertain. Most projects rely on short-term, expert monitoring that ends long before restored wetlands stabilize, leaving major gaps in understanding how restored wetlands actually evolve over time. One increasingly discussed way to close these gaps is to extend monitoring beyond professional teams by engaging local communities and citizens in long-term observation.

In a Perspective published (DOI: 10.1016/j.ese.2026.100656) in Environmental Science and Ecotechnology in January 2026, researchers from Aarhus University and Wetlands International examined how citizen science is currently used in wetland restoration worldwide. By reviewing 120 restoration sites, the team found that fewer than 20% formally integrate citizen science, even in regions with strong restoration policies. The authors argue that recent technological and institutional shifts now make it possible to move citizen science from the margins into the core of restoration monitoring, where it can directly inform adaptive management and long-term decision-making.

The study highlights a clear mismatch between the potential of citizen science and how it is currently used in wetland restoration. Most initiatives remain small, fragmented, and focused on education rather than long-term ecological monitoring. Citizen science projects are heavily concentrated in high-income regions, while wetlands in low- and middle-income countries—often under the greatest pressure—receive little participatory monitoring support.

The authors show that this situation is rapidly changing. Affordable satellites and drones now allow volunteers to track vegetation patterns and water dynamics across entire landscapes. Low-cost sensors enable citizens to monitor water quality, soil conditions, biodiversity, and even greenhouse gas fluxes. Smartphones and mobile platforms make it possible to collect large volumes of georeferenced data over long periods.

Crucially, the study emphasizes that data quality concerns, while still important, are increasingly manageable. Standardized protocols, automated checks, and expert-supported validation systems can substantially improve the reliability and transparency of citizen-generated data. The remain challenge lies largely in institutional practice. Restoration programs still treat citizen science as an add-on rather than a source of decision-relevant information. Integrating these data into formal monitoring systems would greatly improve spatial coverage, temporal continuity, and the ability to detect early signs of ecological success—or failure.

"Wetland restoration does not follow project timelines—it follows ecological ones," the authors note. They stress that relying solely on short-term expert assessments limits the ability to understand long-term outcomes. Citizen science offers a way to extend monitoring far beyond the lifespan of individual projects. When properly designed and validated, public observations can complement professional assessments rather than compete with them. The researchers argue that treating citizen science as monitoring infrastructure, instead of outreach activity, is essential for improving how restoration success is evaluated and managed over time.

Embedding citizen science into wetland restoration could reshape how restoration success is measured worldwide. It provides a scalable, cost-effective way to expand monitoring while strengthening public engagement with ecosystems. For practitioners, continuous local observations support adaptive management and faster responses to unexpected change. For policymakers, citizen-generated data can contribute to national reporting systems and global biodiversity and restoration targets. The authors suggest that future restoration guidelines should explicitly include citizen science, supported by clear protocols, training, and feedback. If widely adopted, this approach could help ensure that restored wetlands remain resilient, functional, and sustainable under increasing climate and land-use pressures.

###

References

DOI

10.1016/j.ese.2026.100656

Original Source URL

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2026.100656

Funding information

This work was supported by the European Union's Horizon Europe programmes WET HORIZONS (Grant Agreement 101056848), NBS4Drought (Grant Agreement 101181351), and PATTERN (Grant Agreement 101094416).

About Environmental Science and Ecotechnology

Environmental Science and Ecotechnology (ISSN 2666-4984) is an international, peer-reviewed, and open-access journal published by Elsevier. The journal publishes significant views and research across the full spectrum of ecology and environmental sciences, such as climate change, sustainability, biodiversity conservation, environment & health, green catalysis/processing for pollution control, and AI-driven environmental engineering. The latest impact factor of ESE is 14.3, according to the Journal Citation ReportsTM 2024.