Showing posts sorted by relevance for query coelacanths. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query coelacanths. Sort by date Show all posts

Wednesday, June 23, 2021


UPDATE
The Coelacanth May Live for a Century. That’s Not Great News

Scale markings reveal that this weird fish's lifespan is double what scientists first estimated. That also means they’re closer to extinction than we thought.


PHOTOGRAPH: THE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM/SCIENCE SOURCE

AFRICAN COELACANTHS ARE very old. Fossil evidence dates their genesis to around 400 million years ago, and scientists thought they were extinct until 1938, when museum curator Marjorie Courtenay-Latimer noticed a live one in a fisher’s net.

Found off the southeastern coast of Africa, coelacanths also live a long time—scientists have suspected about 50 years. But proving that lifespan has been tough. (Coelacanths are endangered and accustomed to deep waters, so scientists can’t just stick their babies in a tank and start a timer.) Now a French research team examining their scales with polarized light has determined that they can likely live much, much longer. “We were taken aback,” says Bruno Ernande, a marine ecologist who led the study. The new estimated lifespan, he says, “was almost a century.”

His team from the French Institute for the Exploitation of the Sea, or IFREMER, found not only that individuals can live to nearly 100 but also that they have gestation periods of at least five years, and may not mature sexually until they’re at least 40. The results were published on Thursday in Current Biology. This slow-motion life highlights the importance of conservation efforts for this rare species, which is marked as “critically endangered” on the IUCN Red List. Only about 1,000 exist in the wild, and their long gestation and late maturity are bad news for their population’s resilience to run-ins with humans. “It's even more endangered than we previously thought,” Ernande says.

“It will have enormous consequences,” agrees Daniel Pauly, an ichthyologist from the University of British Columbia, who was not involved in the study. Pauly is the creator of FishBase, a database of biological and ecological information about tens of thousands of species. If a fish takes decades to spawn, then killing it wipes out its potential to replenish the population. “A fish that needs 50 years to reach maturity, as opposed to 10 years, is five times more likely to be in trouble,” he says.

COELACANTHS HAVE THICK scales that grow up to two inches long, and for decades ichthyologists have been debating how to read those scales for signs of age. In the 1970s, researchers noticed small calcified structures on them. They figured the rings were age markers, like tree rings. They disagreed, however, on how to count them: Some figured that each marking denoted one year; others believed that seasonal flips created two rings per year. At the time, the best guess placed their life expectancy at about 22 years. That conclusion, which meant that a 6-foot, 200-pound coelacanth is 17 years old, implied that they grow very quickly: “They would grow as fast as tuna, which is crazy,” Pauly says.

It’s crazy because these are animals with slow metabolisms, which should indicate slow growth. Coelacanths’ hemoglobin is adapted to that slow metabolism, which means they can’t take in enough oxygen to support a fast-growing fish. Some argue that their small gills are further evidence of oxygen limitations. They also live very passive lifestyles, resting most of the day in caves and lumbering slowly through the ocean’s twilight zone, down at 650 feet and below, when they do deign to move around. “Overwhelmingly, the biological features were pointing to a slow-living fish,” says Ernande.


Plus, scientists tracking the lives of individual coelacanths have known that 20 years is far too low. In the 1980s, researchers started sending submersibles and remote-operated vehicles down to a cave harboring 300 to 400 coelacanths. They returned to this spot for over 20 years. During each visit, they recognized individuals by their characteristic white markings. Only about three or four fish in this group would die, and an equal number of new ones would be born, each year. This observation provided striking evidence that coelacanths live long lives—even more than 100 years, that study argues.

But a population assessment doesn’t pin down age or lifespan directly. Intrigued by this gap, Ernande and his colleagues began tackling coelacanth age as a “fun side project.” He and the study’s lead author, Kélig Mahé, had been determining the ages of species that are commercially fished. Knowing the relationship between a fish’s age and its size helps forecast—and conserve—future populations. They figured they’d conduct a similar analysis for the coelacanth, but since they are endangered, they couldn't fish for them or find any in an aquarium. They instead requested museum specimens from France and Germany.
PHOTOGRAPH: MARC HERBIN/MNHN

The usual way of determining a fish's age is by looking at its otoliths, inner-ear stones that fish use for hearing; they also record the passing years as the calcium carbonate builds up. But otoliths are inside fish heads. Would the French National Museum of Natural History let researchers chop open their prized collection to dig out the little stone for a "fun side project"? The team didn’t even bother asking.

Instead they focused on examining the fish’s scales. In previous studies devoted to counting their rings, researchers had examined them by microscope under regular light. Mahé had something else in mind: polarized light. Light waves normally vibrate every which way, not just the direction in which the wave is traveling. Polarized light is like streaking a comb through messy hair—all the waves now vibrate in the same plane. (The glare of sunlight bouncing off a river is polarized; that’s why polarized sunglasses can filter that entire bundle of rays out simultaneously.) When light hits a sample containing minerals—as calcified fish scale structures do—the polarized light exaggerates these minerals against the rest of the scale, making otherwise invisible structures visible.

The polarized light microscope revealed five times more rings in the coelacanth’s scales than anyone had seen before. These “circuli” were much more fine than the larger and sparse “macrocirculi” that had been observed in the ’70s, and they appeared across all of the museum’s 27 specimens, which ranged from embryos to nearly full-grown adults. Counting circuli told a completely new story: Coelacanths grow very slowly, and they can live extremely long. A coelacanth thought to be 17 years old, if you only counted its macrocirculi, would instead be about 85.

To validate the new approach, the team charted the relationship between each fish’s size and age. Like other fish, coelacanths should grow logarithmically—at first a period of fast growth, followed by a slow plateau as they approach a maximum lifespan. The new ages made sense. Smaller specimens fit neatly in the range they would expect of a fast-growing adolescent, and the largest specimens fit in a slower-growth phase that plateaued near 2 meters and around 100 years old.

The rings found on two large embryos also suggested that they gestate for at least five years. “As far as we know, this is the longest gestation period for a fish,” Ernande says.

Coelacanths become reproductively mature when they’re about 5 feet long. And based on the growth model for the species, Ernande’s team concluded, coelacanths don’t reach that length until they are 40 to 69 years old. That time until sexual maturity is among the longest of any known species.

“That is crazy old,” says Prosanta Chakrabarty, an ichthyologist from Louisiana State University who is not involved in the study. “So old that it makes me kind of dubious, to be honest.” He completely buys the team’s lifespan conclusion. But, he says, the deduction that coelacanths can’t reproduce until halfway to two-thirds of the way into it is extraordinary. And extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence.

The age range for spawning may be off, since it’s deduced from previously reported sizes of mature individuals and their model for determining age from size. To him, the team could solidify the sexual maturity conclusion by accessing one or two coelacanth otoliths or repeating the same scale analysis in other species of fish. “It just comes down to scales,” Chakrabarty says. “Show me that the scales on a brown ruffe, which can also live 100 years, would work in the same way.” Lungfish, a fellow long-lived and limb-finned fish like the coelacanth, could also provide extra assurance in the method, he says.

Ernande shares Chakrabarty’s caution. But since ichthyologists are fairly confident that coelacanths don’t mature while smaller, and coelacanths clearly grow slowly, Ernande is satisfied with his team’s conclusion. “Even though it might not be 50, but 40, or 35, it's still a very old age. That's for sure,” he says.
PHOTOGRAPH: MARC HERBIN/MNHN

Pauly is not surprised that coelacanths take so long to mature: “Fish don't know their age, they know their size.” When a fish gets bigger, it has more trouble breathing. Their body grows in volume, but the gills only grow in surface area. So as the surface-to-volume ratio decreases. At about one third of their maximum weight, a transition to sexual maturity begins. “This tension between the gills and the body—between the oxygen supply and the oxygen need—triggers a transition to do spawning,” Pauly says.

The coelacanth’s delayed sexual maturity and long gestation suggests that conservation efforts are extra important, because any animal that’s lost cannot be quickly replaced. If it takes 40 years for an individual to mature and five more to gestate, removing any adult would make the population “quickly collapse,” Pauly says.

Their unique look and reputation for long life has made coelacanths vulnerable to illegal trafficking and incidental catches in Madagascar. People in the neighboring Comoros Islands sometimes fish them as well. “They were using the scales like sandpaper for their bicycles,” according to Pauly.

Ernande’s team has turned their side project into a major focus area—they now plan to expand their analysis with more and larger specimens. (Perhaps a larger coelacanth might even be older than 100.) And a new area of focus for them will be measuring the fish’s climate resilience. If coelacanths struggle to extract oxygen from warmer water, evidence could show up in their scale rings. If warm water years show up as tighter rings, that’d mean they are growing slower and maturing later as the planet warms—more bad news for coelacanths.

His team won’t know until they glean more stories from the coelacanths’ anatomy. They hope these life stories and climate stories told on a yearly timescale, printed finely on scales of a different sort, will not be cut short.

Thursday, June 17, 2021

THE ORIGINAL CRYPTID

Coelacanths may live nearly a century, five times longer than researchers expected

CELL PRESS

Research News

IMAGE

IMAGE: THIS IMAGE SHOWS ADULT COELACANTH SCALES view more 

CREDIT: LAURENT BALLESTA

Once thought to be extinct, lobe-finned coelacanths are enormous fish that live deep in the ocean. Now, researchers reporting in the journal Current Biology on June 17 have evidence that, in addition to their impressive size, coelacanths also can live for an impressively long time--perhaps nearly a century.

The researchers found that their oldest specimen was 84 years old. They also report that coelacanths live life extremely slowly in other ways, reaching maturity around the age of 55 and gestating their offspring for five years.

"Our most important finding is that the coelacanth's age was underestimated by a factor of five," says Kélig Mahé of IFREMER Channel and North Sea Fisheries Research Unit in Boulogne-sur-mer, France. "Our new age estimation allowed us to re-appraise the coelacanth's body growth, which happens to be one of the slowest among marine fish of similar size, as well as other life-history traits, showing that the coelacanth's life history is actually one of the slowest of all fish."

Earlier studies attempted to age coelacanths by directly observing growth rings on the scales of a small sample of 12 specimens. Those studies led to the notion that the fish didn't live more than 20 years. If that were the case, it would make coelacanths among the fastest-growing fish given their large size. That seemed surprising considering that the coelacanth's other known biological and ecological features, including slow metabolism and low fecundity, were more typical of fish with slow life histories and slow growth like most other deep-water species.

In the new study, Mahé, along with co-authors Bruno Ernande and Marc Herbin, took advantage of the fact that the French National Museum of Natural History (Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris, MNHN) has one of the largest collections of coelacanths in the world, ranging from embryos in utero to individuals of almost two meters. They were able to examine 27 specimens in all. They also used new methods, including polarized light microscopy and scale interpretation technology mastered at IFREMER's Sclerochronology Centre, Boulogne-sur-mer, France, to estimate individuals' age and body growth more precisely than before.

While earlier studies relied on more readily visible calcified structures called macro-circuli to age the coelacanths much as counting growth rings can age a tree, the new approaches allowed the researchers to pick up on much tinier and nearly imperceptible circuli on the scales. Their findings suggest that the coelacanths actually are about five times older than was previously thought.

"We demonstrated that these circuli were actually annual growth marks, whereas the previously observed macro-circuli were not," Mahé says. "It meant that the maximum longevity of coelacanth was five times longer than previously thought, hence around a century."

Their study of two embryos showed they were both about five years old. Using a growth model to back-calculate gestation length based on the size of offspring at birth, the researchers got the same answer. They now think that coelacanth offspring grow and develop for five years inside their mothers prior to birth.

"Coelacanth appears to have one of, if not the slowest life histories among marine fish, and close to those of deep-sea sharks and roughies," Mahé says.

The researchers say that their findings have implications for the coelacanth's conservation and future. They note that the African coelacanth is assessed as critically endangered in the Red List of Threatened Species of IUCN.

"Long-lived species characterized by slow life history and relatively low fecundity are known to be extremely vulnerable to perturbations of a natural or anthropic nature due to their very low replacement rate," Mahé says. "Our results thus suggest that it may be even more threatened than expected due to its peculiar life history. Consequently, these new pieces of information on coelacanths' biology and life history are essential to the conservation and management of this species."

In future studies, they plan to perform microchemistry analyses on coelacanth scales to find out whether a coelacanth's growth is related to temperature. The answer will provide some insight into the effects of global warming on this vulnerable species.


Current Biology, Mahé et al.: "New scale analyses reveal centenarian coelacanths Latimeria chalumnae" https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(21)00752-1

Current Biology (@CurrentBiology), published by Cell Press, is a bimonthly journal that features papers across all areas of biology. Current Biology strives to foster communication across fields of biology, both by publishing important findings of general interest and through highly accessible front matter for non-specialists. Visit http://www.cell.com/current-biology. To receive Cell Press media alerts, contact press@cell.com.


Wednesday, July 30, 2025

 

New examination of fish considered a ‘living fossil’ changes our understanding of vertebrate skull evolution



Researchers reanalyzed the skull musculature of coelacanths, a group of fish that has existed for 400 million years, and concluded that many structures had been incorrectly described.



Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

New examination of fish considered a ‘living fossil’ changes our understanding of vertebrate skull evolution 

image: 

One of the authors of the study, Aléssio Datovo, poses next to a coelacanth specimen on display at the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of Natural History 

view more 

Credit: Museum of Zoology (MZ), USP





The coelacanth is known as a “living fossil” because its anatomy has changed little in the last 65 million years. Despite being one of the most studied fish in history, it continues to reveal new information that could transform our understanding of vertebrate evolution. This is revealed in a study published in the journal Science Advances by researchers from the University of São Paulo (USP) in Brazil and the Smithsonian Institution in the United States.

Upon re-examining the cranial musculature of the African coelacanth (Latimeria chalumnae), the authors discovered that only 13% of the previously identified evolutionary muscle novelties for the largest vertebrate lineages were accurate. The study also identified nine new evolutionary transformations related to innovations in feeding and respiration in these groups.

“Ultimately, it’s even more similar to cartilaginous fish [sharks, rays, and chimaeras] and tetrapods [birds, mammals, amphibians, and reptiles] than previously thought. And even more distinct from ray-finned fish, which make up about half of living vertebrates,” says Aléssio Datovo, a professor at the Museum of Zoology (MZ) at USP supported by FAPESP, who led the study.

Among the evolutionary novelties erroneously identified as present in coelacanths are muscles responsible for actively expanding the buccopharyngeal cavity, which extends from the mouth to the pharynx. This set of muscles is directly related to food capture and respiration. However, the study showed that these supposed muscles in coelacanths were actually ligaments, which are structures incapable of contraction.

Ray-finned fish (actinopterygii) and lobe-finned fish (sarcopterygii) diverged from a common ancestor approximately 420 million years ago. The sarcopterygii include fish such as coelacanths and lungfish, as well as all other tetrapods, because they evolved from an aquatic ancestor. These include mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians.

In ray-finned fish, such as aquarium carp, it is easy to see how the mouth moves to suck in food. This ability gave actinopterygii a significant evolutionary advantage; today, they comprise about half of all living vertebrates.

This is a fundamental difference from other fish, such as coelacanths and sharks, which primarily feed by biting their prey.

“In previous studies, it was assumed that this set of muscles that would give greater suction capacity was also present in coelacanths and, therefore, would have evolved in the common ancestor of bony vertebrates, which we now show isn’t true. This only appeared at least 30 million years later, in the common ancestor of living ray-finned fish,” points out Datovo.

Behind the scenes

Coelacanths are extremely rare fish that live about 300 meters below the surface of the water and spend their days in underwater caves.

One reason they have changed so little since the extinction of the dinosaurs is that they have few predators and live in a relatively protected environment. This has resulted in slow changes to their genome, as shown by a 2013 study published in the journal Nature. 

Coelacanths were first known only from fossils from about 400 million years ago. It was not until 1938 that a living animal was discovered, much to the astonishment of scientists. In 1999, another species (Latimeria chalumnae) was discovered in Asian waters.

Due to the rarity of specimens in museums, researchers from USP and the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of Natural History had to persevere to find an institution willing to lend animals for dissection.

The Field Museum in Chicago and the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, both in the United States, finally agreed to lend one specimen each. According to Datovo, G. David Johnson, co-author of the article, deserves credit for obtaining the loan.

Johnson, born in 1945, was “probably the greatest fish anatomist of his time,” according to Datovo. He died in November 2024 after a domestic accident while the study was under review.

Contribution

“Contrary to what it may seem, dissecting a specimen does not mean destroying it as long as it’s done properly,” says Datovo.

The researcher, who has been conducting this type of study for over 20 years, spent six months separating all the muscles and skull bones of the coelacanth. These structures are now preserved and can be studied individually by other scientists, eliminating the need to dissect a new animal.

Seeing each muscle and nerve firsthand allowed the authors to identify what was actually in the coelacanth’s head with certainty, point out previously undescribed structures, and correct errors that had been repeated in the scientific literature for over 70 years.

“There were many contradictions in the literature. When we finally got to examine the specimens, we detected more errors than we’d imagined. For example, 11 structures described as muscles were actually ligaments or other types of connective tissue. This has a drastic consequence for the functioning of the mouth and breathing, because muscles perform movement, while ligaments only transmit it,” he explains.

Due to the position of coelacanths in the vertebrate tree of life, the discovery impacts our understanding of cranial evolution in all other large vertebrate groups.

With this information, the researcher used three-dimensional microtomography images of the skulls of other groups of fish, both extinct and living. These images are made available by other researchers who study fish anatomy when they perform 3D scans.

From images of the skull bones of other fish from completely extinct lineages, Datovo and Johnson were able to infer where the muscles found in coelacanths would fit, elucidating the evolution of these muscles in the first jawed vertebrates. In future work, Datovo intends to analyze similarities with the muscles of tetrapods, such as amphibians and reptiles.

About São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)
The São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) is a public institution with the mission of supporting scientific research in all fields of knowledge by awarding scholarships, fellowships and grants to investigators linked with higher education and research institutions in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. FAPESP is aware that the very best research can only be done by working with the best researchers internationally. Therefore, it has established partnerships with funding agencies, higher education, private companies, and research organizations in other countries known for the quality of their research and has been encouraging scientists funded by its grants to further develop their international collaboration. You can learn more about FAPESP at www.fapesp.br/en and visit FAPESP news agency at www.agencia.fapesp.br/en to keep updated with the latest scientific breakthroughs FAPESP helps achieve through its many programs, awards and research centers. You may also subscribe to FAPESP news agency at http://agencia.fapesp.br/subscribe. 

Thursday, March 26, 2026

  

Shell-cracking turtles defied mass extinction at the end of the Cretaceous period





Staatliche Naturwissenschaftliche Sammlungen Bayerns
Reconstruction of a snail-eating turtle 

image: 

Reconstruction of a snail-eating turtle of the group Baenidae. It is sitting on a land turtle of the genus Basilemys, which became extinct at the end of the Cretaceous period. In the background is a skull of Tyrannosaurus rex.  

view more 

Credit: Joschua Knüppe, Palaeoartist




The mass extinction at the boundary between the Cretaceous and Paleogene periods was catastrophic, wiping out much of Life on Earth. Vertebrate groups that dominated at the time, such as dinosaurs and many large marine reptiles, fell victim to the effects of the asteroid impact around 66 million years ago. However, the catastrophe did not affect all organisms to the same extent: turtles, for example, survived with only minimal losses.

A new study by the research group led by Serjoscha Evers, paleontologist at the Bavarian State Collection of Natural History (SNSB), now shows that turtles that fed on hard-shelled organisms such as gastropods and bivalves survived the mass extinction largely unscathed. And they were more than five times more likely to survive than turtles that hunted fish or were purely herbivorous.

Apparently, this ecological adaptation in turtles had an impact on their probability of survival. “We are observing an ecological filter. Specializing in hard-shelled food gave these turtle species an evolutionary advantage,” explains author Serjoscha Evers. "This is probably due to the resilience of these food sources themselves – mainly gastropods and bivalves – to the catastrophic effects of the impact. Herbivores had difficulty surviving in the nuclear winter following the impact, with effects on the entire food chain, including carnivores. Mollusks and other opportunists, on the other hand, were able to survive well. Turtles that specialized in such prey were therefore under less pressure."

The diet of turtles is revealed by special anatomical features of their jaws. On this basis, Serjoscha Evers and his doctoral student Guilherme Hermanson from the University of Fribourg in Switzerland constructed a large data set that includes all turtle lineages at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. This enabled the paleontologists to use statistical models to assess how diet as an ecological factor influenced the probability of extinction in turtles.

Senior author Serjoscha Evers is director of the Urwelt-Museum Oberfranken, one of ten museums belonging to the Bavarian State Collection of Natural History (SNSB). Guilherme Hermanson is a doctoral student at the University of Fribourg in Switzerland.

Prehistoric fish: coelacanths heard underwater using their lungs



A study by UNIGE and MHNG shows that 240-million-year-old coelacanths could hear underwater using an ossified lung




Université de Genève

Prehistoric fish: coelacanths heard underwater using their lungs 

image: 

3D rendering of the skeleton of Graulia branchiodonta. The auditory organ includes the bony wings (red) on the ossified lung (white) which transmitted sound vibrations to the inner ear (not shown) located in the prootic bone in the skull (pink) 

view more 

Credit: © L. Manuelli–MHNG





How did ancient fish perceive their environment in the deep-sea? An international team led by scientists from the Natural History Museum of Geneva (MHNG) and the University of Geneva (UNIGE) reveals that some coelacanths – fish living 240 million years ago – used their lung to detect sounds underwater. These findings, published in the journal Communications Biology, were obtained using synchrotron imaging, an especially powerful X-ray technique. They shed new light on the evolution of sensory systems in vertebrates.


Coelacanths have fascinated biologists since their rediscovery in the 20th century. These fish, now represented by two species of the genus Latimeria, are more closely related to terrestrial vertebrates than to other fishes. While modern species live at great depths and breathe exclusively through gills, their ancestors from around 240 million years ago displayed a much wider diversity of forms and habitats. Some had a well-developed lung covered with bony plates arranged like roof tiles. Until now, this organ has mainly been interpreted as an adaptation for air breathing.


To explore its potential additional functions, a research team led by Lionel Cavin, curator at the Natural History Museum of Geneva and adjunct professor in the Department of Genetics and Evolution at the Faculty of Science of the University of Geneva, analyzed Triassic coelacanth fossils discovered in Lorraine (France). The fossils were examined using the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) in Grenoble. This particle accelerator made it possible to investigate the internal structure of the fossils with micrometric precision.


A new auditory system revealed by imaging
The images revealed an exceptionally well-preserved ossified lung, featuring wing-like bony structures at its extremity. At the same time, the study of embryos of modern coelacanths highlighted a canal connecting the organs of hearing and balance located on either side of the skull.


By combining these observations, the scientists suggest that these two structures formed a complete sensory system. Sound waves captured by the ossified lung would have been transmitted to the inner ears via this canal, enabling the animal to perceive sounds underwater. “Our hypothesis is based on analogies with modern freshwater fish such as carp or catfish. In these species, a structure known as the Weberian apparatus connects the swim bladder to the inner ear. This system allows them to detect underwater waves and therefore hear underwater. The air bubble contained in the swim bladder is essential for detecting these waves, which would otherwise pass through the fish’s body undetected,” explains Luigi Manuelli, a doctoral student in Lionel Cavin’s group and first author of the study.


A capacity lost over the course of evolution
For now, this anatomical feature has only been observed in two species of Triassic coelacanths. However, it may have been more widespread among ancient coelacanths possessing an ossified lung. “This auditory ability was likely gradually lost as the ancestors of modern coelacanths adapted to deep marine environments. Their lung regressed, making this system unnecessary,” suggests Lionel Cavin.


Remarkably, some structures associated with the inner ear have nonetheless been preserved. “These anatomical remnants now provide valuable insight into the evolutionary history of these fish – and perhaps also into that of our own aquatic ancestors,” the researcher concludes.