Friday, February 06, 2026

 

Are returning Pumas putting Patagonian Penguins at risk? New study reveals the likelihood




University of Oxford
Dead Magellanic penguin 

image: 

A Magellanic penguin carcass showing signs of predation by puma at the Monte León National Park colony. Courtesy of © Joel Reyero 2024

view more 

Credit: © Joel Reyero 2024



More images available via the link in the Notes

 Section



Summary:

  • Some Argentinian penguins are experiencing high levels of predation from pumas recolonising their historical territory. A new study has quantified the risk on long-term penguin population survival.


  • Over four years, pumas at a national park on the Argentinian Patagonia coast are thought to have killed over 7,000 adult penguins (7.6% of the colony’s adult population) – but left many uneaten.

  • Long-term, however, puma predation alone is unlikely to threaten colony viability, while low breeding success and reduced juvenile survival appear to be greater threats to the survival of these penguins.

  • The findings have been published today (5 February) in the Journal for Nature Conservation.

 

Should we protect an emblematic species if it may come at the cost of another one – particularly in ecosystems that are still recovering from human impacts? This is the conservation dilemma facing Monte Leon National Park, on the Patagonian coast in Argentina.

Since cattle ranching was abandoned in southern Argentina in 1990, pumas (Puma concolor) have been recolonising their historical ranges in this area. For the first time, this brought them in contact with Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) who had moved to the mainland from nearby islands due to the absence of terrestrial predators. Being largely defenceless, the penguins became an easy target for the large carnivore – but it was unknown up to now the exact impact the pumas were having on penguin population numbers.

Since its creation in 2004, researchers from the Centro de Investigaciones de Puerto Deseado of the Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral and rangers from the Monte Leon National Park have monitored the penguin populations in the Park. Over four years (2007-2010), they counted the number of carcasses caused by puma predation. In the new study, they collaborated with researchers from Oxford University’s Wildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU) to analyse the data.

Based on the numbers of penguins found killed, the research team estimated that more than 7,000 adult penguins were killed over the four-year study, most of which were not fully eaten, indicating that not all the penguins were killed for food. This is roughly 7.6% of the adult population (around 93,000 individuals).

Lead author Melisa Lera, a postgraduate student at WildCRU, Oxford University said: “The number of carcasses showing signs of predation we found in the colony is overwhelming, and the fact that they were left uneaten means pumas were killing more penguins than they required for food. This is consistent with what ecologists describe as ‘surplus killing’. It is comparable to what is seen in domestic cats when prey are abundant and/or vulnerable: ease of capture can lead to cats hunting more birds, even when they do not end up actually eating them. We needed to understand if the penguin colony’s persistence could be threatened due to this behaviour.”

However, when the team carried out modelling on the data, this indicated that pumas alone were unlikely to drive the colony at Monte León Park to extinction. Instead, the colony’s future appears to be far more sensitive to factors such as reproductive success and juvenile survival. Population extinction was projected only under hypothetical scenarios combining low juvenile survival (with around 20% failing to reach adulthood) and very low reproductive output (a maximum of one chick per pair). High puma predation was predicted to exacerbate these outcomes.

Study co-author Dr Jorgelina Marino (WildCRU, Oxford University) said: “This study captures an emerging conservation challenge, where recovering carnivores are encountering novel prey. Understanding how these dietary shifts affect both predators and prey is essential to inform conservation.”

Since the models identified breeding success and mortality of the juveniles as some of the key determinants of population viability, the authors highlight the need to understand how environmental factors such as nutrients, food and temperature - known to be influenced by climate change - may affect the penguins’ reproductive success.

As terrestrial predators continue to expand into coastal environments, further mainland colonies of seabirds and other coastal species may become vulnerable. For instance, non-native feral hogs are now key predators of loggerhead sea turtle eggs along the Georgia coast, USA, whilst coyotes in eastern North America are colonising coastal barrier islands, with impacts across these ecosystems.

The authors emphasise the need for sustained monitoring to detect demographic declines early and to guide management actions to prevent severe ecological consequences. The Park authorities continue to monitor Puma and Penguin populations.

---------------------------------

MLNP Website: Parque Nacional Monte León | Argentina.gob.ar

Notes to editors:

For media enquiries and interview requests, contact Melisa Lera, WildCRU, The University of Oxford, melilera9@gmail.com

The study ‘Shifting predator–prey dynamics at the land–sea interface: The case of Magellanic penguins and pumas’ will be published in Journal for Nature Conservation on Thursday, 5 February at 00:01 GMT/UTC, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127208 To view a copy of the study before this under embargo, contact: Melisa Lera, WildCRU, The University of Oxford, melilera9@gmail.com

Images relating to this release that can be used in articles can be found here:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1dErtmsaJKSuizI7oTxQ6V6YB_C8ewmF6?usp=sharing These are for editorial purposes relating to this press release ONLY and MUST BE credited (see captions file in folder). They MUST NOT be sold on to third parties.

About the University of Oxford

Oxford University has been placed number 1 in the Times Higher Education World University Rankings for the tenth year running, and ​number 3 in the QS World Rankings 2024. At the heart of this success are the twin-pillars of our ground-breaking research and innovation and our distinctive educational offer.

Oxford is world-famous for research and teaching excellence and home to some of the most talented people from across the globe. Our work helps the lives of millions, solving real-world problems through a huge network of partnerships and collaborations. The breadth and interdisciplinary nature of our research alongside our personalised approach to teaching sparks imaginative and inventive insights and solutions.

Through its research commercialisation arm, Oxford University Innovation, Oxford is the highest university patent filer in the UK and is ranked first in the UK for university spinouts, having created more than 300 new companies since 1988. Over a third of these companies have been created in the past five years. The university is a catalyst for prosperity in Oxfordshire and the United Kingdom, contributing around £16.9 billion to the UK economy in 2021/22, and supports more than 90,400 full time jobs.

Infographic of the study's findings. 

Credit: Sarah Markes.

Fieldwork included counting carcasses and measuring body dimensions, to better assess the impacts of puma predation.

 © Esteban Frere 2007

An adult puma leaving the penguin nesting area, and a penguin lies dead behind it. (This study did not collar the pumas). 

Courtesy of © Joel Reyero 2024

 

Exposure to burn injuries played key role in shaping human evolution, study suggests




Imperial College London






Humans’ exposure to high temperature burn injuries may have played an important role in our evolutionary development, shaping how our bodies heal, fight infection, and sometimes fail under extreme injury, according to new research. 

For more than one million years, the control of fire has powered human success, from cooking and heating to technology and industry, driving genetic and cultural evolution and setting us apart from all other species. But this relationship has also exposed humans to high temperature injuries at a scale unmatched in the natural world. 

Humans burn themselves – and survive burns – with a frequency likely much greater than any other animal. Most animals avoid fire completely, while in contrast, humans live alongside fire and most humans will experience minor burns throughout their lives. 

A new study published in BioEssays, led by Imperial College London researchers, suggests that this increased exposure to burn injuries may have driven notable genetic adaptations which differentiated humans from other primates and mammals. This may also explain both beneficial and maladaptive responses to severe burn injury. 

Burn injuries exist on a spectrum of severity, with most small injuries healing on their own while severe burns can lead to lifelong disability or death. Burns damage the skin, the body’s main protective barrier against infection, sometimes over large areas of the body. The longer the skin is damaged, the greater the risk that bacteria can enter the body and cause overwhelming infection. 

The researchers argue that natural selection would have favoured traits that helped humans survive small to moderate burns. These may include faster inflammation, faster wound closure (to prevent infection) and stronger pain signals. 

However, while these traits are helpful for less severe injuries, they can become harmful for large burns, which may explain why modern humans can experience extreme inflammation, scarring, and organ failure from major burns. 

Using comparative genomic data across primates, the researchers found examples of genes associated with burn injury responses which show signs of accelerated evolution in humans. These genes are involved in wound closure, inflammation and immune system response – likely helping to rapidly close wounds and fight infection; a major complication after burn injury, particularly before the widespread use of antibiotics. 

These findings support the theory that exposure to burn injuries may have been a notable force on the evolution of humans. 

Dr Joshua Cuddihy, lead author for the study, and Honorary Clinical Lecturer in Imperial’s Department of Surgery and Cancer, said: “Burns are a uniquely human injury. No other species lives alongside high temperatures and the regular risk of burning in the way humans do.  

“The control of fire is deeply embedded in human life — from a preference for hot food and boiled liquids to the technologies that shape the modern world. As a result, unlike any other species, most humans will burn themselves repeatedly over their lifetime, a pattern that likely extends back over a million years to our earliest use of fire. 

“Our research suggests that natural selection favoured traits that improved survival after smaller, more frequent burn injuries. However, those same adaptations may have come with evolutionary trade-offs, helping to explain why humans remain particularly vulnerable to the complications of severe burns.” 

The research was developed through a collaboration between burn injury experts, evolutionary biologists, and genetics experts at Imperial, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, and Queen Mary University of London. 

The study’s novel perspective on human evolution, which could reshape our understanding of modern burn care and human biology, was made possible through interdisciplinary collaboration between clinicians and researchers. 

Professor Armand Leroi, Professor of Evolutionary Developmental Biology in Imperial’s Department of Life Sciences, said: “What makes this theory of burn selection so exciting to an evolutionary biologist is that it presents a new form of natural selection - one, moreover, that depends on culture. It is part of the story of what makes us human, and a part that we really did not have any inkling of before.” 

Yuemin Li, PhD student at Queen Mary University of London, said: “Our study provides compelling evidence that humans have unique adaptive mutations in several key genes associated with burn injury response. 

“These findings could allow us to explore in future research how genetic variations in different groups impact burn injury response, potentially explaining why some patients heal well or poorly after a burn.” 

Unlike other wounds from cuts or bites which would have also led to infections, the increased lifetime risk of burns experienced by humans and their hominin ancestors is unique as they are the only species to regularly experience burn injuries and survive them. 

The researchers’ findings could change how we study burn injuries, design treatments, and interpret complications of burns. It may also explain why translating results on burn injuries from animal models to humans is often ineffective. 

Declan Collins, Consultant in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, said: “Understanding the evolutionary drivers that cause genetic change is an important step in burn research that will influence the way in which we look at scar formation and wound healing. 

“The genetic basis for scarring variation in humans and response to tissue injury is still poorly understood, and this work will provide new angles for future research.” 

‘Burn Selection: How Fire Injury Shaped Human Evolution’ by Joshua Cuddihy et al. is published in Bioessays

ENDS

-- 


 

About Imperial College London 

We are Imperial – a world-leading university for science, technology, engineering, medicine and business (STEMB), where scientific imagination leads to world-changing impact. 

As a global top ten university in London, we use science to try to understand more of the universe and improve the lives of more people in it. Across our nine campuses and throughout our Imperial Global network, our 22,000 students, 8,000 staff, and partners work together on scientific discovery, innovation and entrepreneurship. Their work navigates some of the world’s toughest challenges in global health, climate change, AI, business leadership and more. 

Founded in 1907, Imperial’s future builds on a distinguished past, having pioneered penicillin, holography and fibre optics. Today, Imperial combines exceptional teaching, world-class facilities and a habit of interdisciplinary practice to unlock scientific imagination.

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/

 

Unraveling the physics behind Kamchatka's 73-year earthquake cycle




University of Tsukuba



Kamchatka Peninsula - Wikipedia


Tsukuba, Japan—In July 2025, a massive earthquake with a magnitude of 8.8-8.9 struck off the Kamchatka Peninsula, Russia. Notably, this event ruptured nearly the same region as the M9.0-class earthquake of 1952, yet the recurrence interval was only 73 years—far shorter than expected for such giant earthquakes, thereby challenging conventional seismological understanding.

In this study, the researchers estimated the rupture process of the 2025 Kamchatka earthquake using the Potency Density Tensor Inversion (PDTI) method, originally developed at the University of Tsukuba. The analysis showed that the fault slip reached 9-12 m across a broad area, substantially exceeding the ~6 m of slip deficit accumulated since 1952, and that slip accelerated twice within the large-slip zone. Following the mainshock, low-angle normal-faulting aftershocks, opposite to the direction of plate convergence, were concentrated near the plate boundary. This observation indicates that dynamic overshoot occurred during the mainshock, leading to a local reversal of shear stress. Based on these results, the team concluded that residual strain left unresolved by the 1952 earthquake combined with post-1952 strain, and that this accumulated strain was largely released during the 2025 event.

The study emphasizes that variations in rupture physics and stress release can leave substantial residual strain after a major earthquake, thereby disrupting regular recurrence intervals. These findings indicate that real-world megathrust earthquakes exhibit complex, nonperiodic behavior that cannot be fully explained by conventional seismic-cycle models. The results have important implications for long-term earthquake forecasting in subduction zones worldwide, including the Nankai Trough.

###
This research is supported by Japan Society for the promotion of Science (JSPS) Grantin-Aid for Scientific Research (B) 25K01075.

 

Original Paper

Title of original paper:
Breaking the Cycle: Short Recurrence and Overshoot of an M9-class Kamchatka Earthquake

Journal:
Seismica

DOI:
10.26443/seismica.v4i2.2012

Related Link

Institute of Life and Environmental Sciences