NATGAS = HYDROCARBONS

Alaska seeks to build natgas pipe from North Slope to Fairbanks

 Fri, February 5, 2021

Feb 5 (Reuters) - Alaska wants to start on the first phase of the state's liquefied natural gas (LNG) export plant and pipeline project by working with a private firm seeking to build a natural gas pipeline from the North Slope to Fairbanks.

The proposed $5.9 billion gas pipe would run roughly 500 miles (805 kilometers) from Prudhoe Bay to Fairbanks and could start delivering gas into central Alaska in 2025, according to a report Frank Richards, president of the Alaska Gasline Development Corp (AGDC), presented to the board on Thursday.

The report, which was supported by the board, said the companies would seek federal stimulus or infrastructure funding to help cover the cost of the first phase and attract outside investment.

Richards told local media the company would look for about 75% of the cost of the first phase to come from federal funds, according to an article in the Canadian Press.

The total $38.7 billion project includes an 807-mile (1,300-km) pipeline with the capacity to transport about 3.3 billion cubic feet per day from the North Slope to a liquefaction plant in Nikiski on the Kenai Peninsula.

The LNG export plant and pipeline project have been talked about for a long time. Alaska signed an agreement with major oil and gas companies to build the project in 2014, but the state ended up taking over the project in 2016 after the North Slope oil companies backed out.

Since then, AGDC received federal authorization to build the project in May 2020 and signed agreements with BP PLC and Exxon Mobil Corp to help advance its development.

BP and Exxon produce massive amounts of oil in Alaska and have discovered huge gas resources that are stranded in the North Slope. Alaska LNG would allow that gas to access markets around the world.

(Reporting by Scott DiSavino Editing by Elaine Hardcastle)

#STATEHOOD  OR #INDEPENDENCE

As Trump prosecutor, delegate gets her say on impeachment

“Virgin Islanders are always looking for space to be a part of this America and try to make it better, even without a vote, I’m going to make sure that their voice and the voice of people from territories representing four million Americans — Puerto Rico and other places — are actually heard.”


Trump Impeachment PlaskettFILE - In this Aug. 24, 2020, file photo, Del. Stacey Plaskett, D-V.I., speaks during a hearing on the Postal Service on Capitol Hill in Washington. Plaskett couldn’t cast a vote last month when the House impeached former President Donald Trump. But she can help prosecute him. The non-voting delegate from the Virgin Islands is among the impeachment managers selected by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to argue the case that Trump incited a deadly insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. (Tom Williams/Pool via AP, File)


PADMANANDA RAMA and MARY CLARE JALONICK
Fri., February 5, 2021


WASHINGTON (AP) — Stacey Plaskett couldn't cast a vote last month when the House impeached former President Donald Trump. But she can help prosecute him.

The non-voting delegate from the Virgin Islands is among the impeachment managers selected by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to argue the case that Trump incited a deadly insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. It's an extraordinary moment that places Plaskett in the center of just the fourth impeachment trial of an American president.

But there will also be a familiar dynamic when Plaskett walks into the Senate chamber, one that she's experienced from elementary school through her legal career: being one of the only Black women in the room. Now that Kamala Harris has left the Senate to become vice president, there are only three Black senators left, and they're all men. The chamber remains overwhelmingly white despite growing diversity in the House.

Like most of the impeachment managers, Plaskett brings considerable legal experience to the case, including a stint in the Bronx District Attorney’s office and as a senior counsel at the Justice Department. She said being asked to join the team was an invigorating way to deal with the catastrophic events of Jan. 6, when she and her staff barricaded themselves in her office as the rioters descended on the Capitol.

“My method of handling things like this is to work,” Plaskett said, adding that receiving the unexpected call from Pelosi “really gave me a charge and something to do.”

As an impeachment manager, it falls to Plaskett and the other Democrats to break through partisan divisions and persuade skeptical Republicans in the Senate — 45 of whom have already voted for an effort to dismiss the case — that they should take the unprecedented step of convicting Trump and barring him from office.

To do so, they’ll have to retell the harrowing events of Jan. 6, when hundreds of people, some bearing racist and anti-Semitic symbols on their clothing, terrorized the Capitol and forced lawmakers into hiding. They intend to link it all to Trump, the man they say is “singularly responsible” for the riot by telling his supporters to “fight like hell” against the certification of President Joe Biden’s election victory.

Trump’s rhetoric, Plaskett said, was “an attempt to destroy what I believe America is.”

As a woman of color, Plaskett says she’ll be speaking at the trial for individuals who were “particularly traumatized by what happened on January 6th. You know, as an African-American, as a woman seeing individuals storming our most sacred place of democracy, wearing anti-Semitic, racist, neo-Nazi, white supremacy logos on their bodies and wreaking the most vile and hateful things.”

The trial also gives Plaskett a chance to work alongside Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., the lead impeachment manager who was one of her law school professors at American University’s Washington College of Law. She called him an “incredible man” and said his ability to “be inclusive, and to tease out and to encourage people to share” has brought her back to those days.

In turn, Raskin said Plaskett was “truly dazzling” as a law school student.

“Other students used to take notes when she spoke and that was amazing to me,” Raskin says. “She struck me quickly in class as a potentially brilliant prosecutor and I encouraged her to take that path. I could not be prouder of her career, and adore her even though she has more seniority than me and teases me about that constantly.”

Plaskett was born in the Bronx to parents who moved to New York from the Virgin Islands. At 13, she started at an exclusive Connecticut boarding school were she says she “continually had to raise my hand and try and speak to non-minority people about actions and events to let them see through a lens that what has happened is, in fact, racist or demonstrates their privilege.”

Pelosi’s impeachment team is diverse — including Colorado Rep. Joe Neguse, who is also Black — but Plaskett will be the first manager of a presidential impeachment from a U.S. territory.

Plaskett says people in the Virgin Islands — once home to a young Alexander Hamilton — may live in a small place, but don’t think of themselves as small people. "We’re big shots in everything we do,” she said.

“Virgin Islanders are always looking for space to be a part of this America and try to make it better, even without a vote,” she said.

“I’m going to make sure that their voice and the voice of people from territories representing four million Americans — Puerto Rico and other places — are actually heard.”

CORPORATE WELFARE BUMS

Samsung eyes Texas for $17 bln chip plant

Fri., February 5, 2021, 3:32 a.m.

Samsung Electronics is eyeing Austin, Texas as the possible site for a new 17 billion dollar chip plant.

That's according to documents filed with Texas state officials.

The South Korean giant says the deal could create around 1,800 jobs.

But it may hang on what kind of incentives are on offer.

Samsung is seeking combined tax abatements of more than 800 million dollars over 20 years from Austin and Travis County.

If the Texas site is selected, Samsung says it will break ground in the second quarter, and have the plant operational by late 2023.

The firm says it's also looking at alternative sites in Arizona and New York states, as well as at home in South Korea.

It's potentially a big win for U.S. chipmaking.

While Intel does make some semiconductors there, most of the contract manufacturers that make chips for other companies - including Samsung - are based in Asia.

Last year Samsung rival TSMC disclosed plans for 12 billion dollar chip plant in Arizona, due to come online in 2024.

NOT YET GREEN CAPITALI$M

BP Extends Ties With Palantir Heading Towards Zero-Emission, Clean Energy Company

 Anusuya Lahiri

Fri, February 5, 2021

• Palantir Technologies Inc. (NYSE: PLTR) and BP plc (NYSE: BP) extended their partnership to help BP become a zero-emission and clean energy company by 2050.

• The move is especially relevant to President Biden’s heightened focus on zero-emission and clean energy.

• Palantir will provide BP with its software for global deployment across the organization under a multi-million dollar deal spanning several years.

• Palantir and BP’s partnership dates back to 2014, with Palantir’s software being a vital catalyst in BP’s digital transformation.

• BP will use Palantir’s Foundry software for five more years in newer zones towards its digitization objectives and energy transition goals.

• BP’s digital twin applications, powered by Palantir, have led to a significant boost to the hydrocarbon-based workflows.

• Further opportunities remain for BP’s new ambition, wind farm optimization, electric charging networks, solar generation, including its zero-emission aims.

• The collaboration has produced tangible results in operations management, asset allocation, strategic planning, and procurement.

• Palantir platform and associated applications will continue to be used to drive value in production, operations, simulation, and modeling.

• Price action: PLTR shares are trading higher by 0.78% at $32.23, and BP shares are up 0.02% at $20.99 on the last check Friday.

Green Energy Firms to Help Power Spanish IPO Revival in 2021

Macarena Munoz, Myriam Balezou and Rodrigo Orihuela
Thu, February 4, 2021


(Bloomberg) -- Spain’s national stock market, home to a solitary listing in 2020, is gearing up to host a flurry of green energy providers in the coming months.

At least four companies including Repsol SA are working on possible initial public offerings of renewable assets in Madrid, according to people familiar with the matter. Driving the trend is an increasingly environmentally-conscious investor base and a national government intent on generating power from sustainable sources.

“The public market is paying more than the private sector for these types of assets now. This is in stark contrast to 18 months ago,” said Inigo Gaytan de Ayala, global head of equity capital markets at Banco Santander SA. “Time is of the essence and first-mover advantage is critical. Companies want to move swiftly and make the most of this favorable window.”

Companies that produce renewable energy have raised $336 million via IPOs on European exchanges over the last 12 months, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. By far the largest listing came from Soltec Power Holdings SA, a green power generator and manufacturer of certain devices for solar panels.

Soltec’s was the only IPO on a Spanish exchange in 2020, when the coronavirus crisis kept many companies and investors away from public markets. The deal pipeline is looking decidedly healthier this year, with Capital Energy, Opdenergy SA and Ecoener Emisiones all weighing plans to list in the country in the spring, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing confidential information. Two other privately-owned renewables firms are also considering IPOs, one of the people said.

Representatives for Capital Energy and Ecoener said the companies were analyzing possible IPOs, though no final decisions have been taken. Spokespeople for Opdenergy and Repsol declined to comment.

Political Push

“The strong level of activity Spain is currently enjoying in the renewable segment is probably a combination of different factors,” said Angel Arevalo, global head of advisory at Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA. Among these, he said, are the country’s large renewable resources, falling generation costs and “strong local political commitment to alternative energy.”

Spain’s government has been working to boost renewable power in its generation mix from around 50% today to 70% by 2030, and 100% before 2050. Last month, Spain held its first power auction in four years and awarded 3 gigawatts of new wind and solar capacity. The country is set to become a recipient of European rescue funds to help rebuild its economy in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic and a large allocation of these could go to clean energy projects.

“Spain is structurally a great base for renewable companies, particularly for firms that focus on solar energy given climate,” said Jerome Renard, head of European equity capital markets at Bank of America Corp. “The country saw investments in that industry very early on, and therefore benefits from a whole ecosystem of expertise.”

So far in Spain, stock performance from the sector has been stellar.

Shares in Soltec have risen 137% since it went public. Grenergy Renovables has also more than doubled from when the Spanish power producer moved from the country’s alternative market to main exchange in late 2019. BBVA’s Arevalo said renewables in Spain were offering “better returns for investors compared to other geographies.”

Mainstream Asset

Investment banks are also preparing to pick up more mandates tied to sustainable energy initiatives. Gonzalo Garcia, co-head of investment banking at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, said in a January interview that the shift toward renewables would be one of the key market themes for banks this year.

Capital Energy is working with Goldman Sachs and UBS Group AG to gauge investor interest ahead of its potential share sale, a person familiar with the matter said. Repsol is working with JPMorgan Chase & Co. on its renewables IPO plan, people said.

Representatives for Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and UBS declined to comment.

“In the past, renewables used to attract specialist investors with a focus on the energy sector,” said Renard at Bank of America. “It has now become completely mainstream, reaching a much wider base of investors.”


©2021 Bloomberg L.P.

After Trump disgrace, Biden reopens door to refugees and Americans who want to help them

Building a more enduring resettlement program depends on the approval and engagement of Americans. 

Making deeply personal connections is the key.

Sasha Chanoff and Vilas Dhar

President Joe Biden just threw a lifeline to victims of one of the modern world’s greatest tragedies: He announced his administration's intention to raise the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program's annual cap to 125,000 people.

That's up from the 15,000 set by the Trump administration, and it restores America's commitment to welcoming the world's most vulnerable for resettlement.

U.S. policy on this issue under former President Donald Trump limited resettlement to an all-time low of 11,814 people in the year that ended last Sept. 30, and gutted a 40-year bipartisan tradition.

But the actions that abruptly shut America’s doors triggered an outpouring of support. Individual citizens inundated resettlement agencies with offers of assistance. Groups of friends, organizations and businesses hosted dinners for refugees to hear their stories, connect and help. “In response to Trump’s harmful policies, there was an unprecedented surge of support for refugees,” said Danielle Grigsby, Director of Policy and Practice at Refugee Council USA, a coalition supporting refugees and asylum seekers. 

Rolling the dice with harm and death

Protecting lives in present danger is the heart of America’s resettlement program. There are, for example, thousands of interpreters who served U.S. military forces abroad and are consequently under constant threat; unaccompanied children kidnapped by traffickers facing torture and death or enslavement; parents in the United States frantic to reunite with children in dangerous circumstances. For those waiting, each day means rolling the dice with harm and death. Immediate action in such cases is urgent. Doing nothing is a stain on our national conscience.

Under President Biden’s leadership, we have a unique opportunity to reimagine the resettlement system and realign federal policy with grassroots will. The Biden administration should fully support The Grace Act, a bill that sets a minimum of 95,000 refugee arrivals a year — the average since the program’s inception in 1980.  

Ultimately, building a more enduring resettlement program depends on the approval and engagement of the American people. Making deeply personal connections is the most powerful way to do this.

Take Barbara and Ed Shapiro. They've embraced the Hayani and Aljelou families, from Syria, upon their arrival at Boston’s Logan International Airport and have helped them with housing, jobs and school for the children. The Shapiros say these newfound friendships are the rarest privilege of their lives. They, along with members of their synagogue who also helped, are now staunch advocates for resettlement.

A cruel cap:Give me your tired, your poor ... but not too many of them

Canada has pioneered this kind of grassroots engagement with its 42-year-old Private Sponsorship of Refugees program, which puts Canadians in the driver’s seat in helping refugees enter and integrate in Canada. Nearly 2 million people volunteered to help Syrian arrivals in 2015 and 2016, an effort that has built a fiercely loyal nationwide grassroots support network.

Biden’s executive order prioritizes this kind of pivotal community sponsorship, which is already practiced in a number of the 200 resettlement agencies across the USA.

Chris George, executive director of the Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services (IRIS), a Connecticut-based agency, says that if the United States had a program like Canada’s, “we would enjoy so much public support for refugees that no elected official would dare dismantle the resettlement program.”

Refugees help America

IRIS is pioneering a co-sponsorship model, in which professional staff train community volunteers who then take the lead in helping refugees to integrate. This effort intimately links Americans with newcomers’ hopes, dreams and challenges, and increases the speed at which they secure their first jobs and feel a sense of home.

Once refugees arrive, they are often stuck in low-paying jobs. Federal policies should align with best practices to help refugees and immigrants become self-reliant. Newcomers get better paying jobs with workplace-focused English language instruction, according to a results-based new program in Massachusetts.

More broadly, educating employers to create more inclusive hiring practices, and educating newcomers to adapt their skills and experience to the U.S. workforce, as the organization Upwardly Global does, opens up higher-paying professional jobs.

America ultimately benefits. A recent study showed that refugees contribute $63 billion more to the economy over the past decade than they take in services. Today, former refugees are standing shoulder to shoulder as front-line COVID-19 responders, even as others revitalize depressed towns and cities with their entrepreneurship.

As the number of people forcibly displaced worldwide surpasses 80 million, roughly 1% of humanity, American leadership is needed. We must save lives under imminent threat and, as Biden says, rebuild "a more inclusive and welcoming America." Citizens have already displayed a commitment to lead. This is the moment to reimagine our program, and ensure that refugee resettlement again becomes one of our proudest and most enduring traditions.

Sasha Chanoff (@SashaChanoff), a Charles Bronfman Prize Laureate, is the founder of RefugePoint and co-author of "From Crisis to Calling: Finding Your Moral Center in the Toughest Decisions." Vilas Dhar (@vilasdhar) is president of the Patrick J. McGovern Foundation.

Country music response to Wallen racism shows Republicans how they failed on Greene


Kurt Bardella, Opinion columnist 
USA TODAY Opinion
Sat., February 6, 2021


At the same time House Republicans were trying to figure out what to do about QAnon Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, the country music community was grappling with how to hold one of their biggest stars accountable for using the N-word. In the span of 24 hours, the country music genre became a mirror for the societal tensions our country has been trying to navigate.

Morgan Wallen was infamously caught on tape using an abhorrent racial slur. It was just four months after Wallen was mired in another controversy — when NBC's "Saturday Night Live" rescinded his invitation to perform because he violated COVID safety protocols. After embarking on an image rehabilitation tour, he was invited back and appeared on the show in December, even participating in a skit poking fun at the entire situation.

In January, Wallen opened up on ABC's "Good Morning America" about the struggles of being a single parent. It was a well-choregraphed public relations campaign to soften his bro-country, fraternity boy image. With the January release of his double-album, "Dangerous," Wallen was on top of the music world, smashing streaming records and cementing his place as country music’s next bona fide superstar.

Related: VIDEO 1:00 Morgan Wallen no longer eligible for Academy of Country Music Awards after using racial slur


Dropped within 24 hours

The backlash was swift and furious.

Grammy Awards-nominated country music artist Mickey Guyton, fresh off her performance on "The Late Show" with Stephen Colbert of “Black Like Me” (it’s also Black History Month) tweeted, “The hate runs deep. … How many passes will you continue to give? Asking for a friend. No one deserves to be cancelled, but this is unacceptable. Promises to do better don’t mean sh*t.”

Superstar Maren Morris responded with a meme saying, “I just can’t,” and later commented on a separate thread to fellow artist Kelsea Ballerini that if a female artist had done this, “we’d be dropped, endorsements lost, social pariahs to music row.”

Morgan Wallen on Nov. 11, 2020, in Nashville, Tennessee.

Within 24 hours, Wallen’s music and videos had been dropped by country radio, streaming platforms and CMT. The Academy of Country Music announced that it “will halt Morgan Wallen’s potential involvement and eligibility for this year’s 56th Academy of Country Music Awards cycle.” Most consequentially, his label, Big Loud Records, announced it was suspending him “indefinitely.”

Unsurprisingly, Wallen's fans remain committed to him.

A cursory search of “Morgan Wallen” on Twitter, for instance, shows comments from fans declaring him their “still favorite” country music artist, pledges to not “cancel” him, etc. If you search “Morgan Wallen Trump,” the divisions within the country at large come to light as people compare Morgan Wallen defenders to those who support a certain twice-impeached private citizen who resides in Florida.

SOCIAL REVOLUTION IS INTERSECTIONAL IT IS PROLETARIAN

Something extraordinary was happening in country as the Wallen scandal exploded. TJ Osborne, one-half of the award-winning Brothers Osborne duo, in his first public reveal, told TIME that he was gay. That makes him the first male artist signed to a major record label in Nashville who is openly gay.

The response was as dramatic as what greeted Wallen, but in a completely opposite direction. Superstar Dierks Bentley tweeted, “Love this guy right here. Happy you are telling your story dude.”

Jimmie Allen, one of the format’s only black artists, tweeted, “TJ!!! I’m super proud of you dude. I love the person you are and your heart. Thankful for your courage.” Kacey Musgraves, one of the most successful and acclaimed female artists of this era, tweeted, “Overcome with joy. He’s one of my best friends and one of the bravest people I know.”

This is the Nashville that I’ve come to know and be a part of. One of inclusiveness, friendship, community and love. It wasn’t lost on me that TJ came out on the same day that Pete Buttigieg became the first openly gay Cabinet secretary confirmed by the Senate, and was sworn in by the first black and female vice president.

Lessons from country's decisive action

And in one day, Nashville became a real-time lens for the rest of our country. How do you reconcile a community whose fastest-rising star uses the N-word, but also a community that genuinely supports an artist like TJ for coming out? How do you reconcile speaking up and speaking the truth, when a portion of the audience has been radicalized by the same forces that have upended our democracy? I think the answer begins with accountability and a baseline standard for what constitutes moral conduct.

I found myself thinking, what if House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy and the rest of the GOP stood up to Donald Trump and Marjorie Taylor Greene the same way the country music community united to hold Morgan Wallen accountable? In one collective action, the community decided to drop his music, disqualify him from awards and suspend his record deal, even though the decision to do so is probably unpopular with the country music “base.”

But from this decisive and very public act of self-policing, country music has established a precedent for action against anyone who crosses the line. If it can happen to the guy who is literally at the top of the music charts, it can happen to anyone. No one is bigger than the community. And because it took action, country music is not at risk of being overrun by conspiracy theorists, racists and insurrectionists. It is able to hold on to the high-ground and continue this community's efforts to promote peace, equality, equity, unity, and acceptance.

The fact that country music is doing more to hold people accountable than the Republican Party illustrates how far off-course the GOP has gone.



Kurt Bardella, creator and publisher of the country music tipsheet the Morning Hangover and a member of USA Today’s Board of Contributors, was the spokesperson and senior adviser for the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Republicans from 2009-2013. Follow him on Twitter: @kurtbardella

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Morgan Wallen backlash spotlights shameful Republican failure on Greene

THAT OTHER QANON CONGRESSWOMAN; A FLAKE
A fluke or the future? Boebert shakes up Colorado district
Sat., February 6, 2021, 7:16 a.m.·5 min read




DENVER — Colorado's 3rd Congressional District, a stretch of ski resorts, national forest, ranches, coal towns and desert mesas the size of Pennsylvania, has long bred low-key politicians.

Its voters have skewed slightly to the right, prized practicality and for years rewarded representatives for accomplishments that fall below the national radar, such as the Hermosa Creek Watershed Act, a crowning achievement of former Republican Rep. Scott Tipton.

Until now.

The district's newest representative, Republican Lauren Boebert, is an unabashed, social media-savvy loyalist of former President Donald Trump who, like her fellow first-term colleague GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, is stoking controversy with her far-right views and defiant actions. But unlike Greene, Boebert doesn't hail from an overwhelmingly GOP, safe district.

That makes Boebert a test case for whether even a slight partisan advantage will inevitably empower the most extreme elements of a party. The question strategists in Colorado and elsewhere in this divided country are asking is whether Boebert is a fluke — or the future.

“Are we so locked in, so partisan, that it overshadows everything, even in these close districts?” asked Floyd Ciruli, a veteran Colorado pollster. “Bringing out such controversial forces and taking out an incumbent were not dangerous, even in a district like that.”

Boebert, 34, who owns a gun-themed restaurant in the town of Rifle, began making waves immediately. In her first month in office, she filmed a video in which she purported to carry a pistol in defiance of the District of Columbia's anti-gun laws, argued for the right to bring firearms onto the House floor, voted to overturn President Joe Biden's election and tweeted about the whereabouts of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Jan. 6, leading to allegations — that she vehemently denies — that she was helping Trump loyalists who attacked the U.S. Capitol.

Her first taste of politics came as a response to polarization on the other side of the aisle. In 2019, former Rep. Beto O’Rourke of Texas, who was vying for the Democratic presidential nomination, vowed to ban assault weapons. He held an event in the Denver suburb of Aurora, near the site of the 2012 Aurora theatre massacre.

Boebert made a four-hour drive from her home in Rifle to confront O’Rourke over his statement that “hell, yes” he was taking AR-15s. “Hell, no, you’re not,” she said.

Cristy Fidura, 43, who with her husband, a former oil fields worker, owns a trucking company in the former steel city of Pueblo, never engaged in politics — until she saw that confrontation. She immediately became one of Boebert's first supporters.

“I could relate to her, just like President Trump. He's not a politician and she's not a politician, and running this country is a business,” Fidura said. “I feel so many people are convinced that government has to make decisions for them and I think that's sad, that's scary.”

Marla Reichert, the outgoing chair of the Pueblo County GOP, said voters in the district have long wanted someone who would vote for them in Washington and tell the Democrats “hell, no” to overreach.

Tipton, a five-term incumbent whom Boebert upset in last year's GOP primary, “voted the right way. People just felt he wasn't in there fighting the Democrats. He wasn't on Fox News, pushing back,” Reichert said.

In an interview, Boebert said the district's voters are eager for disruption. “My constituents are tired of the old go along to get along we often see in politicians," she said.

Boebert insists she and the rest of the first-term class of lawmakers are the future, even in districts like hers.

“It is the America First movement that you're seeing nationally and definitely in my district,” she said.

Josh Penry, a veteran Republican strategist who represented the area in the Colorado statehouse, is skeptical that Boebert’s style will stick.

“There are very real limits to that shtick in rural Colorado, which is why she only won with 51%,” Penry said. “When the sizzle wears off, there are big blocs of voters who will be totally up for grabs and will want to know that their congresswoman is trying to be part of the solution in between cable news show hits.”

Boebert defeated her Democratic opponent 51% to 45% in November. More Republicans than Democrats are registered voters, though the largest bloc is unaffiliated and the district is gaining retirees and refugees from urban areas who lean to the left.

Democrats are lining up potential challengers for 2022. Although the state Republican Party has embraced Boebert, some in the GOP whisper about a possible primary challenge.

The biggest threat may be redistricting. By 2022, a nonpartisan commission will have redrawn the boundaries of Boebert’s district, which could become more Democratic or more Republican with the inclusion of a few neighbouring communities.

Boebert's first bills as a congresswoman — opposing Biden’s mask-wearing mandate on federal property and withholding funds for rejoining the Paris climate accord and the World Health Organization — will go nowhere. But her decrying of Biden's pause on oil and gas drilling on federal lands, which comprise 55% of the district, has been embraced by voters who depend on the industry.

Republicans here have both praise and warnings for the congresswoman.

Scott McInnis, a former six-term Republican congressman from the district, said that high-voltage partisan warfare doesn’t get results for the region’s voters. “You have to have good communication with local communities so you can quickly facilitate what they need from the federal government, whether it be a cattle grazing permit or a ski permit,” he said.

Janet Rowland, a Mesa County commissioner who advised Boebert on her campaign, said Boebert must keep fighting the Biden administration’s efforts to suspend drilling on federal lands. She praised Boebert but said the new congresswoman needs to work with the Biden administration when she can — and oppose it when she must.

“Our residents are sick of the continued attacks on both sides,” Rowland said. “Biden won. He’s our president. Let’s move on.”

James Anderson And Nicholas Riccardi, The Associated Press

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's history of spreading bizarre conspiracy theories, from space lasers to Frazzledrip


Rachel E. Greenspan INSIDER
Fri., February 5, 2021

In this Jan. 6, 2021, file photo, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., sits in the House Chamber after they reconvened for arguments over the objection of certifying Arizona's Electoral College votes in November's election, at the Capitol in Washington 

Erin Schaff/The New York Times via AP, Pool, File


The House voted to remove Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, from committees.


Greene has espoused beliefs tied to the QAnon conspiracy theory.


Here's her history of supporting conspiracy theories online.


Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's election to Congress came after she spread conspiracy theories on social media for years.

The Georgia Republican, elected in November, has supported the QAnon conspiracy theory and associated falsehoods, claimed that mass shootings were "false flag" events, and made other outlandish allegations. In addition to espousing beliefs in these conspiracy theories, Greene showed support in 2018 and 2019 for the execution of Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, CNN reported. She has also said that Black people "are held slaves to the Democratic Party."

But former president Donald Trump sang Greene's praises ahead of her election while he was still in office, writing in an August tweet that she was a "future Republican Star" and "strong on everything."

The House voted to strip Greene of her committee assignments on Thursday evening.

When asked for comment regarding all of Greene's claims that are referenced in this article, a spokesperson told Insider, "Aren't you in the 'news' business? None of this is new."

Here's a list of false claims Greene has spread online.

The QAnon conspiracy theory

The QAnon conspiracy theorists hold signs during the protest at the State Capitol in Salem, Oregon, United States on May 2, 2020. John Rudoff/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

Greene's apparent belief in QAnon, a baseless far-right conspiracy theory alleging Trump was fighting a "deep state" cabal of pedophiles, was widely reported ahead of her election to Congress. QAnon has been linked to several crimes and the movement played a huge role in the January 6 riot at the US Capitol.

In a 2017 YouTube video, Greene called "Q," the anonymous figure whose cryptic messages on 8kun (formerly 8chan) lead the QAnon movement, a "patriot."

Greene said "Q" is "someone that very much loves his country, and he's on the same page as us, and he is very pro-Trump." The last message from "Q" came on December 8, and many people have suspected that Jim Watkins, the owner of 8kun, is "Q" himself, or at least associated with the figure.

Read More: The QAnon conspiracy theory and a stew of misinformation fueled the insurrection at the Capitol

"There's a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to take this global cabal of Satan-worshipping pedophiles out, and I think we have the president to do it," Greene said in the video.

Many of the other conspiracy theories Greene has espoused are linked to the QAnon community.

The Pizzagate conspiracy theory 

THIS IS A REDO OF THE RIGHT WING EVANGELICAL

SATANIC PANIC OF THE 1980'S

Kori and Danielle Hayes at a Pizzagate demonstration, outside the White House in Washington, DC on March 25, 2017. 

Michael E. Miller/The Washington Post via Getty Images

CNN reported that in a 2017 blog post, Greene shared a link to a far-right website that suggested "Pizzagate," the 2016 conspiracy theory alleging that Clinton and aides ran a child-trafficking ring out of a DC pizza restaurant, was real.

"Shockingly, the website tells about information that was only whispered about and called conspiracy theories," Greene wrote, according to CNN.

"Pizzagate" was the precursor to QAnon, which originated in 2017.

Frazzledrip

Greene has expressed belief in the existence of "Frazzledrip," a fictitious video that conspiracy theorists claim shows Hillary Clinton and aide Huma Abedin sexually assault a child before slicing off her face and wearing it as a mask.

The vulgar conspiracy theory spread on YouTube in 2018, as the Washington Post reported. YouTube videos claiming that "Frazzledrip" existed were viewed millions of times that year, the Post found. "Frazzledrip" folklore remains popular in the QAnon community.

Greene made Facebook comments about "Frazzledrip," which were recently reported by left-leaning nonprofit Media Matters for America (MMFA), in May 2018.

Greene posted a picture of the mother of a slain New York Police Department detective, Miosotis Familia, and a commenter said that Familia had "watched a horrific video" allegedly seized from the laptop of disgraced former congressman Anthony Weiner, Abedin's ex-husband. The commenter said that the video showed Abedin and Clinton "filleting" a child's face, according to screenshots obtained by MMFA.

Greene liked the comment, and replied, "Yes Familia." In a subsequent comment, she said, "Most people honestly don't know so much. The msm disinformation warfare has won for too long!"

Denials that 9/11 and mass shootings took place

A recently resurfaced video shows Marjorie Taylor Greene harassing Parkland shooting survivor David Hogg on Capitol Hill before she became a representative for Georgia. Twitter/@fred_guttenberg

Greene has baselessly questioned whether the deadly shootings in Newtown, Connecticut, and Parkland, Florida, actually took place.

In several 2018 Facebook comments, Greene agreed with other users that the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, was a "false flag" event. MMFA reported the comments, which have since been deleted from Greene's Facebook page.

When another commenter in 2018 claimed that "none of the School shootings were real," the September 11, 2001, attacks were staged by the US government, and that the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, was staged, Greene agreed.

"That is all true," she said in a comment, according to screenshots reported by MMFA.

All of those claims are false and have been debunked.

A recently resurfaced video from earlier that year shows Greene accosting David Hogg, a survivor of the Parkland shooting, who was 17 at the time, in Washington, DC. Hogg was in town to advocate for gun control at the Capitol. Greene followed the teen down the street, calling him a "coward," just weeks after the shooting at his high school killed 17 people.

In a Facebook post later that year, Greene claimed that Pelosi "tells Hillary Clinton several times a month that 'we need another school shooting' in order to persuade the public to want strict gun control."

Linda Beigel Schulman, the mother of one of the Parkland shooting victims, told MSNBC in an interview aired Sunday that she spoke to Greene on the phone, and the congresswoman admitted to believing that the shootings had actually taken place.

Schulman said Greene refused to join her on MSNBC to publicly make the admission. "For Congresswoman Greene, politics trumps truth, because lies and conspiracy theories are more important to her than honesty," Schulman said.

The conspiracy theory that space lasers controlled by a Jewish family caused wildfires

Perhaps the most shocking of all of Greene's conspiracy theories is the idea that lasers in space had caused the deadly Camp Fire in California in the fall of 2018. The Camp Fire was the deadliest wildfire in California's history.

QAnon believers and other conspiracy theorists popularized the space laser theory, and Greene posted about it on Facebook, MMFA found.

Greene said she believed the Rothschild investment bank was involved in the creation of the lasers. "Could that cause a fire? Hmmm, I don't know," she said of laser beams in space. "I hope not! That wouldn't look so good for PG&E, Rothschild Inc, Solaren or Jerry Brown who sure does seem fond of PG&E."

Rothschild is controlled by the Rothschild family, a wealthy Jewish family from Germany that has for centuries been the subject of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. Such claims play a huge role in QAnon, which is partly based on anti-Semitic tropes.

Read More: QAnon builds on centuries of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories that put Jewish people at risk

The conspiracy theory that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg had been replaced by a body double

In February 2019, while Greene was a conservative commentator, she was a guest on a streaming show on a pro-Trump website, and a viewer called in to suggest that a recent public appearance of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was actually a body double. "I do not believe that was Ruth. I don't think so," Greene responded, MMFA first reported.

The claim that Justice Ginsburg had previously died and was replaced by a body double was hugely popular in the QAnon community in the summer of 2019, as Travis View, the co-host host of the "QAnon Anonymous" podcast, has reported.

The false claim that Trump won the 2020 presidential election

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., wears a "Trump Won" face mask as she arrives on the floor of the House to take her oath of office on opening day of the 117th Congress at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Sunday, Jan. 3, 2021 Erin Scott/Pool via APMore

Greene was one of numerous Republican lawmakers to deny the validity of President Joe Biden's election win, even wearing a "TRUMP WON" mask on the House floor on January 3.

She has repeatedly tweeted about her belief that Trump won the election and encouraged her constituents to hold onto that idea. In a December 23 tweet, she said, "The people re-elected Donald Trump. Now, it's time to #FightForTrump." She shared a petition supporting the Stop the Steal movement, which inspired the January 6 rally that led to the deadly Capitol riot.

Claims that Trump won the election sparked the frenzy that led to the insurrection at the US Capitol on January 6. More than 200 people have already been arrested on charges related to the insurrection.

Read the original article on Insider

NUTTER T PARTY FOR Q

Critics say Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez exaggerated her Capitol riot story. Here's what she said.

Jeanine Santucci, USA TODAY
Fri., February 5, 2021, 

WASHINGTON — After Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez told an at-times emotional story about fearing for her life the day of the Jan. 6 pro-Trump riot on the Capitol, conservatives were quick to accuse her of exaggerating and politicizing her account.

The New York Democrat told CBS News in an interview that the backlash is one reason she waited to share her experience in the first place.

"So many survivors fear being publicly doubted. But the fact of the matter is that the account is accurate," she said.

Ocasio-Cortez in an Instagram Live video on Monday described her experience that day as traumatic and disclosed she is a sexual assault survivor. She likened the rhetoric of those who want people to move on from the Jan. 6 riot "without accountability" to the tactics of abusers.

Freshman Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., who this week was stripped of her House committee assignments for her support of dangerous conspiracies and racist remarks, accused Ocasio-Cortez of having "faked her outrage with another hoax."

Here's a look at the criticisms and how they compare with what Ocasio-Cortez said:

What AOC said in her Capitol riot story

On Monday, Ocasio-Cortez detailed an encounter with a Capitol Police officer whom she initially feared was a rioter.

Near the time the mob was clashing with security outside the U.S. Capitol, she said, someone began banging on the doors of her office. Fearing that rioters had entered the building where her office is, she hid inside a bathroom within her inner office.

Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., said she heard a man yelling, " 'Where is she?' And I just thought to myself, 'They got inside.'"

More: Democratic lawmakers join Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in sharing Capitol riot experiences

She said she saw a man wearing a black beanie through the door hinge and, as he continued to yell for her, "I thought I was going to die."

After emerging from her hiding spot, Ocasio-Cortez and her legislative director realized the man was actually a Capitol Police officer. He didn't identify himself as such and "was looking at me with a tremendous amount of anger and hostility," she said.

Told to leave the building but not given a specific destination, Ocasio-Cortez said she and her legislative director were searching for where to go and could hear rioters just outside.

She and her legislative director ended up barricading themselves in Rep. Katie Porter's office, where staff pushed furniture up against the doors. In case they needed to run outside, she and Porter rummaged through staffers' things to find workout clothes to wear to better blend into the crowd in case they needed to go outside.

She said she remained in Porter's office for several hours until the Capitol was secured.

#AOCLied and other things her critics are saying

Conservatives on social media have cast doubt on Ocasio-Cortez's account, saying she was not in the Capitol Building itself during the attack and that her office was too far away for her to have been scared for her life.

Social media posts with the hashtag #AOCLied and some Republican lawmakers said she was exaggerating and using the story to politicize the Capitol attack.

Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., who was sworn in to Congress last month, said on Twitter that her office is near Ocasio-Cortez's and that rioters were not in the halls of their offices.

However, Ocasio-Cortez never said rioters were in the halls, only that she feared they might enter and that she initially feared the police officer she interacted with that day was a rioter.

How trauma works: Ocasio-Cortez is explaining something about trauma. Experts say we should listen.

In her account of the dramatic encounter with the officer, she described him as a man in a black beanie and did not say he was an officer until the end of the encounter. However, some early reports and social media posts that circulated before she got to that part of the story described the man as an insurrectionist.

Porter, whose office Ocasio-Cortez hid in after leaving her own, said Ocasio-Cortez was not exaggerating her fear.

"She came to my office building. I saw her. She asked if she could come into my office. I am here to tell you and everybody, she was terrified," Porter said on CNN.
Where was Ocasio-Cortez during the riot?

Ocasio-Cortez was clear in her Instagram post that she was not in the main Capitol Building, but rather was in the Cannon House Office Building, part of the Capitol complex connected to the Capitol Building by tunnels.

In her video, she described the uncertainty from that day, with members of Congress not receiving clear communication on safety measures or updates about the breach.

"As the Capitol complex was stormed and people were being killed, none of us knew in the moment what areas were compromised," Ocasio-Cortez later tweeted, pointing out that Mace had also said she barricaded herself inside her office out of fear.

After the officer told her to leave Cannon and head to another building, Ocasio-Cortez said she and her legislative director spent some time figuring out where they were supposed to go, eventually winding up in Porter's office.

About the lockdown and evacuation

Rioters breached the Capitol Building and occupied parts of it for several hours on Jan. 6, prompting the lockdown of the entire Capitol complex and evacuation of multiple buildings.

Rioters stormed in from multiple sides of the 1.5 million-square-foot complex through just a few of its 658 windows and 850 doorways minutes after the order to evacuate. Rioters crowded halls inside the Capitol Building and climbed over chairs. Some made it inside the Senate chambers, while others sat inside lawmakers' offices. A man wielding zip-tie handcuffs made it to the Senate floor.

Capitol riots: How police failures let a violent insurrection into the Capitol

Some of Ocasio-Cortez's critics say she was not in danger in the building where her office is located, but Ocasio-Cortez pointed out on Twitter that the attack was not only centralized in the Capitol dome and that there was reason for alarm throughout the Capitol complex.

"People were trying to rush and infiltrate our office buildings - that’s why we had to get evacuated in the first place," she tweeted.



Pipe bombs were also discovered at the headquarters of the Republican and Democratic national committees, located within a few blocks of the Capitol. However, it is not clear whether they were placed as part of riots.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: How #AOCLied compares to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's Capitol riot story

Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, Rep. Tlaib and Rep. Bush share traumatic stories from Capitol riots