Friday, February 04, 2022

 CHILE

Wildfires are razing native forests and peatlands in Tierra del Fuego

Devastating wildfires are raging in Chile’s Tierra del Fuego. They threaten crucial global ecosystems and the habitat of the indigenous Selk’nam population. So far the state has responded slowly, and the situation could still worsen.

The Selk’nam Community Organization in Chile (COVADONGA ONA) issued an urgent call for assistance in protecting ancestral lands.

On Jan. 25, wildfires broke out in the Timaukel area of Tierra del Fuego. The fires have since burned through more than 250ha of woodland, destroying large areas of local peatlands and threatening the Karukinka Natural Park.

Park representatives, including the director of the The Wildlife Conservation Society in Chile (WCS), who manage the park, have called for more help in tackling the fires — beyond what has been pledged so far by the government and by National Forest Corporation Conaf.

Meanwhile, the Selk’nam Community Organization — whose ancestral lands are burning — are doing what they have been doing every day since the fires began: highlighting this emergency and seeking help in stemming the flames.

Also read:

The Selk’nam group maintain that government agencies were slow to recognize the urgency of the situation. Others on social media have also critiqued the resources and equipment being made available to fire fighting crews. Emergency agency Onemi issued only a yellow alert when it became clear the Karukinka Park was under threat. Only on Jan. 28 was it raised to a red alert.

Tackling the flames is further complicated by local geography. The availability of water-pumping machinery is limited which means fire trucks have to travel long distances to access water — in turn generating significant fuel expenses which have so far largely cost the municipality of Timaukel.

The costs of delay and inaction are great. Not only locally, where the natural beauty of Karukinka is at risk, but also globally.

This is because the peatlands that are currently burning form a unique ecosystem with a quality that benefits the whole world: they are significant carbon sinks.

Peatlands cover only around 3 percent of the world’s surface but, when they are healthy and moist, they store more carbon than all the Earth’s forests. When peatlands like those in Tierra del Fuego burn, they not only release carbon into the atmosphere, they also lose their ability to absorb and store carbon and thus their ability to help limit the worsening of global climate change.

This is something that the governor of Magallanes, Jorge Flies, has highlighted in recent months. In August last year, Magallanes became the first region in Chile to declare a Climate Emergency. And Tierra del Fuego plays vital roles in tackling that emergency. The world’s most southerly concentration of peatlands are located on the island, storing gigatonnes of carbon accumulated over more than 18,000 years. Tierra del Fuego’s peatlands are also home to species that are not found anywhere else. Protecting these lands is vital for protecting biodiversity.

Increase in forest fires

The events in Tierra del Fuego come at a time when the frequency and scale of wildfires around the world are increasing due to climate change. Recent fires elsewhere in South America have been particularly intense. In the first week of January, more than 300,000ha in Argentina were affected, along with 20,000ha in Uruguay and 9,000ha in Chile’s Araucanía region, some 700km south of Santiago.

Although the scale of the current fires in Timaukel appears relatively small, the affected forests are mainly made up of native trees, meaning a devastating loss of old-growth and diverse woodlands. The extent of the fire could yet increase rapidly due to increasingly unpredictable weather events.

These forests and peatlands also form part of sacred territories in Chile of the Selk’nam indigenous community.

For centuries, the Selk’nam people have suffered violence and marginalization at the hands of the state and people protected by the state. Today, the Selk’nam Community Organization continue their fight for legal recognition in Chile — connecting with more than 800 Selk’nam descendants to maintain shared cultural, artistic, spiritual, territorial, and linguistic connections. Their struggle is of universal concern, since injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. At a time when the whole world faces ever-worsening wildfires, their territorial struggle takes on new significance. It is vital that Selk’nam efforts in Chile to protect Tierra del Fuego receive all the support they need.

 

Why Chile’s president-elect is celebrated like a rockstar

Gabriel Boric will be Chile’s youngest president. His victory over far-right José Antonio Kast was decisive – and owed to a splendid communications and social media strategy. While success is by no means certain, so far most of the country and Boric seem to enjoy the honeymoon.

The country seems to be taken by surprise by Gabriel Boric, elected president over a week ago, leading his far-right opponent José Antonio Kast by almost 12 points. In those few days, Boric has become a rockstar, celebrated by audiences of different ages anywhere. Crowds gather outside the villa his alma mater, Universidad de Chile, provided him to support his pre-presidential work. Masses follow him on his travels, even asking for autographs and a photo, or at least a smile, when he received his Covid-19 booster shot. The 35-year-old Boric has turned his dog Brownie into a social media phenomenon.

Emotions Connect

But how did that emotional connection emerge within just one week? A first explanation is that for the more than four and a half million of his voters – he received most votes in Chile’s history – the night of Dec. 19 was some kind of relief. Because the truth is that Boric not only mobilized a million more new voters than in the first round but also enabled many to overcome the fear induced by the right, and the fear of a decisive turn that promised to roll back the social and cultural advances that were already won.

In the first round, Kast beat Boric, even though, among others, he proposed eliminating the Women’s Ministry, re-criminalize abortion (although the law is already highly restrictive) and abolish the divorce law. He wanted to remove Chile from various international organizations, ignoring ILO Convention 169 that protects indigenous rights, and he wanted to build a ditch to prevent the entry of immigrants. Not to envy Donald Trump or Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro, who deems Boric a communist and refused to congratulate him.

Also read:

Something Else is Afoot

But the phenomenon I have observed in these last few days seems to be more profound. From what I saw, the country needed not only a generational change but also recover lost affections, closeness and emotionality, which Michelle Bachelet enabled and Sebastián Piñera could never achieve. Piñera remained deluded, believing voters loved and admired him like his predecessor.

From the emotional point of view, if Bachelet represented the loving and understanding mother and Piñera the successful but absent and cold father, Boric may symbolize the good-natured, close and complicit older brother. For the difficult times ahead, a more empathetic style of who will lead the second democratic transition and sign the new Constitution may make a difference.

Also, the communication design in the second round was very successful: it projected Boric as a simple, authentic young man, one among millions using social networks to share their lives. The campaign mixed humor, music, and dance with political content. It was a strategy that captured new young targets, and even the press. If something made a difference beyond ideology, it was this closeness. While Kast reinforced his anti-communist narrative – a desperate drive in the last week – Boric appeared to be doing the same things normal people do.

From a political angle, if the first week marked a change of climate, Boric also sent transcendental signs. From the outset, he signaled openness to expand his government and include actors, for example from the Socialist Party, that are not from his Apruebo Dignidad coalition.

Read more:

Out with the Old

On the other hand, José Antonio Kast offered “constructive collaboration” with the new government, in addition to pressuring yet another parliamentarian of his far-right Republican Party into resignation due to publicly promoting homophobic positions. We do not know if this is a genuine change or a move to win leadership of the future opposition, taking advantage of the crisis into which the right plunged after the defeat. But it doesn’t matter, the gesture is important. At the same time, the right has not only been adrift, but the mutual reproaches for either having supported Kast or not have been intensifying and increasingly divide the sector.

Meanwhile, Boric is already marking a complete turnaround in style with respect to Piñera. And it leads to results, so much that Piñera has once again tried to capitalize on Boric’s image by inviting him – clumsily via the media – to his last foreign trip, to Colombia in January. Boric saw through the charade and rejected the invitation, which brought him public support but criticism from the elite.

Of course, this time before assuming the presidency in March is the best period an elected leader can enjoy. Still, Boric’s style and wide support for him augur a good prognosis. We’ll see how things evolve, but for now, the country seems to be enjoying this anticipated romance with Boric the pop idol.

Taliban reopens universities for Afghan women in two provinces

Men will attend classes in the morning and women in the afternoon


Updated: February 02, 2022 
(File) Representational image | AP

The Taliban, on Wednesday, said they have reopened public universities for women students in two of Afghanistan's 34 provinces, a move marking a major concession to international demands by the country's new rulers.

Since they swept into power in mid-August last year, the international community has watched to see whether the Taliban will impose the same harsh measures as during their 1990s rule of Afghanistan, including banning girls from education and women from the workplace and public life.

The Taliban have imposed several restrictions, many of them on women, since their takeover women have been banned from many jobs outside the health and teaching sector, and girls have not been able to go to school after grade six.

The Taliban demand women wear headscarves but have stopped short of imposing the burqa, the head-to covering that was compulsory under their previous rule.

The Taliban-run culture and information ministry said Wednesday that public universities in the provinces of Nangarhar and Kandahar were now open for women in what it described as a staggered process expected to see all students men and women eventually return to university.

The two provinces have warmer climates and therefore are the first to reopen, the ministry said. Men will attend classes in the morning and women in the afternoon, aligning with a gender-segregated system under the Taliban.

Earlier this week, Abdul Baqi Haqqani, the Taliban-appointed education minister, said that public universities elsewhere in Afghanistan, including the University of Kabul, would reopen for both men and women on February 26.

All instructors and officials are advised to concentrate on their responsibilities and provide the required facilities for the students, Haqqani said in a recorded video clip on Sunday.

The United Nations mission in Afghanistan welcomed his announcement, calling it important for Afghanistan in a tweet Tuesday.

So crucial that every young person has equal access to education, the mission said.

On Wednesday, Taliban-appointed culture and information minister, Khairullah Khairkhwa, visited the Kandahar University and said that modern and Islamic education simultaneously can lead a country to prosperity. Since their takeover, the Taliban have come under heavy fire for denying girls and women education.

Reopening of public universities would be their first concession. The Taliban have also promised that all girls will be back in school by the end of March at the start of the Afghan new year.
Taliban fighters banned from bringing weapons into amusement parks
Taliban fighters banned from bringing weapons into amusement parks
The Taliban’s main spokesman, Zabihullah Mujahid, Wednesday announced that the cabinet had decided that Taliban fighters were no longer allowed to carry their weapons, wear their military uniforms, or drive their military vehicles in amusement parks in Afghanistan.

The Taliban took control of Afghanistan’s capital in Kabul on August 15, 2021. According to Taliban members, the majority of young Taliban fighters had not ever been to Kabul prior to their takeover and were reportedly eager to visit one of Kabul’s largest amusement parks and a waterslide park at the Qargha reservoir before returning to duties around the country. Therefore, Taliban members who visited the amusement park were clutching automatic rifles while on the amusement park rides. This behavior caused many visitors of the park to flood the internet with pictures of Taliban members on pedal boats or bumper cars with rifles in hand.

As a result, Mujahid took to Twitter to inform the world that “Mujahideen of the Islamic Emirate are not allowed to enter amusement parks with weapons, military uniforms and vehicles.” He continued by adding that they “are obliged to abide by all the rules and regulations of amusement parks.” 

The cabinet’s decision has been seen by the international world as yet another attempt by the Taliban to persuade fellow Afghans and the rest of the world that the Taliban has become more modern and should receive access to international financial support amid a growing humanitarian crisis.

UPDATED

India Arie Shares Clips Of Joe Rogan Using N-Word, Calling Black People "Apes"

By Erika Marie
February 03, 2022 

Joe Rogan' Podcast Continues To Create Turmoil Within Spotify



She recently joined several other artists who asked Spotify to remove their catalogs because of comments Rogan makes on his podcast.

She recently shared that she would be removing her music from Spotify due to her feelings regarding the platform's partnership with Joe Rogan and now, India Arie is sharing more about her decision. Several artists have come forward this week with statements about The Joe Rogan Experience and their grievances with the podcast sharing misinformation about COVID and the vaccines.

Artists like Neil Young and Joni Mitchell have sparked a protest of sorts against Spotify, and Arie added her name to the list—but not because of COVID. The award-winning Neo-soul singer stated that Rogan's comments about race have disturbed her and Spotify's viewed approval of his language has resulted in her taking drastic steps.

Arie returned to not only double down on her stance but to share several clips of Rogan on his podcast referring to Black neighborhoods as "Planet of the Apes" and carelessly saying "n*gger" on-air in several episodes.

"He shouldn't even be uttering the word. Don't even say it, under any context. Don't say it. That's where I stand. I have always stood there," said the singer, before she explained that Spotify reached out to her to ask what she wanted. Arie claimed that the platform admitted that most of its streams are from Black artists, so she questioned why they would pay a fraction of a cent to artists while giving Rogan a $100 million deal.

Additionally, she said she has been against Rogan for some time, but it wasn't until Neil Young voiced his ire and removed his music from Spotify that she was able to come forward with her complaints. Meanwhile, Spotify's CEO Daniel Ek recently stated no one creator can make the platform change its policies.

Check out India Arie's video below as well as Rogan's n-word moments on his podcast.


 

GRAHAM NASH TO REMOVE MUSIC FROM SPOTIFY: “I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH AND SUPPORT MY FRIEND NEIL YOUNG”

BY TINA BENITEZ-EVES

2 DAYS AGO

Graham Nash has joined his former bandmate Neil Young by removing his music from Spotify in a growing artist-driven protest over what they call misinformation about COVID-19 and vaccines being shared by podcast host Joe Rogan.

Nash, 80, is the latest in a growing number of artists, including Joni Mitchell, E Street Band guitarist Nils Lofgren and most recently India Arie, who have all requested to have their music removed from streaming platform in unison with Young and in opposition of comments made on Rogan’s Spotify podcast The Joe Rogan Experience.

“Having heard the Covid disinformation spread by Joe Rogan on Spotify” said Nash in a statement, I completely agree with and support my friend Neil Young and I am requesting that my solo recordings be removed from the service.”

On Jan. 26, Young requested that his music be removed from Spotify if the streaming platform wanted to keep Rogan, who he said was sharing “fake information about vaccines – potentially causing death to those who believe the disinformation being spread by them.” 

The Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young singer and guitarist, who also co-founded the 1960s pop group the Hollies, said that the opinions being shared on Rogan’s show are “dishonest and unsupported by solid facts” and that Spotify is an enabler, cos people their lives.

Nash added, “There is a difference between being open to varying viewpoints on a matter and knowingly spreading false information which some 270 medical professionals have derided as not only false but dangerous. Likewise, there is a difference between misinformation, in which one is unaware that what is being said is false, versus disinformation which is knowingly false and intended to mislead and sway public opinion.”

Spotify has responded to the backlash by adding added content advisories to podcasts discussing COVID-19. Rogan also issued a statement defending his guest’s opinions but also stating that he is open to adding guests with more diverse opinions moving forward.

“It should also be acknowledged that many younger musicians, and many musicians of all ages, rely on platforms like this to gain exposure to a wider audience and share their music with the world,” added Nash. “Not everyone is able to take steps like this which is all the more reason that platforms like Spotify must be more responsible and accountable for the content they are obligated to moderate for the good of the public at large.”

Video by American Songwriter
The Joe Rogan, Neil Young & Spotify Controversy EXPLAINED | Headlines
Neil Young has threatened to pull his music from Spotify unless they remove Joe Rogan's podcast from their platform. We're breaking down the whole story for you on this episode of Headlines. 


Neil Young and other artists leave Spotify
in opposition to COVID-19 misinformation
spread by podcaster Joe Rogan

Kevin Reed
WSWS.ORG
2 February 2022

On Sunday, the audio streaming service Spotify publicly responded to a growing number of artists who have joined rock star Neil Young and removed their music from the platform in response to the spreading of misinformation about the pandemic by the platform’s featured podcaster Joe Rogan.

Without ever mentioning Neil Young or Joe Rogan, Spotify CEO Daniel Ek posted a statement on the company news feed that admitted the $40 billion corporation has had policies for “what is acceptable and what is not” for many years, but “we haven’t been transparent around the policies that guide our content more broadly.”

Ek went on to say that Spotify was making public for the first time its platform rules and adding “a content advisory to any podcast episode that includes a discussion about COVID-19.” Ek also said the advisory would direct listeners to its global COVID-19 Hub that includes “data-driven facts, up-to-date information as shared by scientists, physicians, academics and public health authorities around the world, as well as links to trusted sources.”

Joe Rogan, Neil Young (Wikimedia Commons)

On Monday, shares of Spotify Technology jumped 13.6 percent in value, a recovery of the more than $4 billion it had lost after Neil Young published a series of scathing letters on his website beginning on January 24, demanding that his music be removed from the platform.

According to Rolling Stone, Young addressed his first letter—which has since been removed from his website—to his manager and a Warner Music Group executive. It stated, in part, “I am doing this because Spotify is spreading fake information about vaccines—potentially causing death to those who believe the disinformation being spread by them. Please act on this immediately today and keep me informed of the time schedule.”

Young then wrote, “I want you to let Spotify know immediately TODAY that I want all my music off their platform. They can have Rogan or Young. Not both.” Rolling Stone also quoted Young, writing, “With an estimated 11 million listeners per episode, JRE, which is hosted exclusively on Spotify, is the world’s largest podcast and has tremendous influence. Spotify has a responsibility to mitigate the spread of misinformation on its platform, though the company presently has no misinformation policy.”

Furthermore, Young explained that by removing his music from Spotify, he would lose “60 percent of my worldwide streaming income in the name of Truth” and he denounced Spotify as “the home of life threatening COVID misinformation. Lies being sold for money.”

On January 28, Young issued another statement that said, “When I left Spotify, I felt better.

“I support free speech. I have never been in favor of censorship. Private companies have the right to choose what they profit from, just as I can choose not to have my music support a platform that disseminates harmful information. I am happy and proud to stand in solidarity with the front-line health care workers who risk their lives every day to help others.”

Spotify was founded in 2006 in Sweden by Daniel Ek and Martin Lorentzon. It is the world’s largest audio streaming service with 381 million users, 172 million of whom are paid subscribers. By comparison, Apple Music has 72 million and Amazon Music has 55 million paid subscribers.

Joe Rogan, 54, is a comedian, television host and mixed martial arts commentator who has developed into one of the most popular and lucrative podcast hosts over the past 12 years. In May 2020, he signed an exclusive multi-year deal with Spotify worth a reported $100 million for the Joe Rogan Experience (JRE).

Rogan has an ongoing relationship with extreme right-wing and fascistic figures such as the radio host and Infowars publisher Alex Jones. Jones was banned directly by Spotify and by a series of other online platforms for his promotion of the alt-right, white supremacy, antisemitism, conspiracy theories and lies about the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings in 2012. However, Jones has been given a platform for his fascistic ranting on JRE during extensive conversations with Joe Rogan.

While Rogan maintains that he does not support the views of the far right, his objective is to transmit fascistic and white nationalist views among the public and give them an air of legitimacy. This has certainly been the case with the content of the information on his podcast about the pandemic, much of which would fit perfectly well within the realm of QAnon supporters and the fanatic Trump-supporter and fascist Republican Representative from Georgia, Marjorie Taylor Greene.

For example, on New Year’s Eve, episode 1757 of JRE featured an interview by Joe Rogan with Dr. Robert Malone, a right-wing physician who has spread falsehoods that COVID-19 vaccines “don’t work” and compared vaccination efforts to the measures carried out by the Nazis in 1930s Germany. Malone also said that efforts to combat the pandemic were “mass formation psychosis,” meaning millions of people have been “hypnotized” into believing in COVID testing, vaccination and other measures to stop the spread of the virus.

While Rogan has made comments like, “I don’t know if this guy is right or wrong. I’m just asking questions,” the lies told by Malone were so outrageous that 270 doctors, physicians and science educators signed an open letter calling on Spotify to take immediate action against pandemic misinformation on its platform. While the open letter from the doctors did not demand that Spotify remove the Rogan-Malone episode, YouTube took the decision to remove it.

In another instance, on April 23, 2021, Rogan discouraged young people from getting the vaccine during a conversation with comedian Dave Smith, saying, “if you’re like 21 years old, and you say to me, ‘Should I get vaccinated?’ I’ll go ‘no.’”

On Friday, Spotify removed Neil Young’s music from its platform, saying they “regret” his decision, “but hope to welcome him back soon.” Neil Young has since been encouraging other artists to join him and asking listeners to move to competing music streaming services such as Amazon and Apple because of their support for Hi-Res audio, which Spotify does not offer.

Over the weekend, Joni Mitchell and Nils Lofgren—a member of Neil Young’s band Crazy Horse and Bruce Springsteen’s E Street Band—joined the campaign. Mitchell said, “I’ve decided to remove all of my music from Spotify” in solidarity with Young. Lofgren wrote that he urged “all musicians, artists and music lovers everywhere” to do the same.

In an online video, Rogan responded to the objections and admitted that his show has grown “out of control.” He promised to be more balanced and informed about the topics and guests on the program and thanked Spotify for standing behind him. He also claimed he was a huge Neil Young fan.

The opposition of artists with mass international followings to right-wing, anti-science and anti-vaccine views circulating among the public—and especially among the youth—is a welcome development. Contrary to the claims of the far-right, this is not a case of “censorship.” Spotify has a massive and lucrative contract with Rogan to promote his podcast.

However, there are much deeper issues involved. The source of the hysterical opposition to the range of actions needed to eliminate COVID-19—including masking, contact tracing, isolation, vaccination, social distancing, economic restrictions and lockdowns—is the capitalist system.

The corporate and financial elite, with the backing of both the Democrats and Republicans, is deliberately cultivating the environment within which far-right individuals and groups are permitted to spread lies and confusion within the public. This is being done in order to force children into the schools, keep workers on the job and guarantee that the profits and wealth of the billionaires continues to roll in regardless of the numbers who will get sick and die from the pandemic.

The only way to stop the lies, defeat the right wing and expose its facilitators like Rogan is through the independent political mobilization of the working class against the capitalist system and in the fight for socialism.

Morning Joe rains hell on Spotify for 'stupid' plan to protect Joe Rogan
Tom Boggioni
January 31, 2022

MSNBC screenshots

Reacting to a statement from Spotify that they will begin to add a “content advisory” notice to virus-related content in response to the backlash against Joe Rogan's misinformation-laden podcasts, MSNBC's Joe Scarborough lashed out at the platform calling their handling of the controversy "stupid."

With legendary artists like Neil Young and Joni Mitchell pulling their music from the platform for allowing the popular podcaster to spew falsehoods endangering the public's health -- and fans canceling their accounts -- Spotify's CEO Daniel Ek issued a public letter stating, "We know we have a critical role to play in supporting creator expression while balancing it with the safety of our users. In that role, it is important to me that we don’t take on the position of being content censor while also making sure that there are rules in place and consequences for those who violate them.”

Although Ek didn't name Rogan, the intent was clear that the company is trying to put out a major fire that is impacting their bottom line while protecting Rogan who signed a multi-million dollar deal with them

RELATED: Joe Rogan's wildest interview yet

After shouting multiple times "This is stupid!" the "Morning Joe" host went on a diatribe against the company for trying to protect Rogan who admitted he doesn't do any research before allowing his guests to spout whatever they want -- often with no pushback.

"Let's separate what Rogan said and Spotify said," he began. "What Spotify said was a total copout. When they go, 'we're going to label any discussion about covid,' no, you don't label any discussion about covid; you label the garbage discussions where people are coming on with conspiracy theories and talking about ivermectin and talking about other things that the medical field, the medical community, disagree with and all of you -- you know, you have a guy on talking, spewing conspiracy theories about the vaccine."

"So for Spotify to say, 'Oh, we're just going to warn everybody if there's ever a discussion on Covid,' that is such a copout by Spotify," he continued.

"I mean I don't listen to the program, I haven't listened to it much, not a regular listener, I will say there is sort of a both sides-ism going on with him [Rogan] where, you know, I will put on this person who is spewing dangerous information and then I will put on somebody who is smart," he continued. "It is also like I'll put on Alex Jones and then I will put somebody on the other side who doesn't say that the parents who got murdered, whose children got murdered at Sandy Hook are not just actors and that wasn't a false flag."

"I was going to say you can't have it both ways but Spotify is allowing him to have it both ways," he later added. "He's an entertainer and he never said he is anything else but an entertainer, he should be free to say what he wants to say. It is Spotify here that really -- they've got to do better."

Watch below:

MSNBC 01 31 2022 06 40 48youtu.be




Can delta-8 THC provide some of the benefits of pot – with less paranoia and anxiety?

January 31, 2022 

Hemp plants growing on a farm in Colorado. krblokhin/Getty Images


Over the past year, you may have seen something called delta-8 THC or “delta 8” appear in convenience stores and pharmacies alongside CBD gummies, oils and lotions.

Delta-8 THC is a hemp-derived compound that’s closely related to delta-9 THC – what’s commonly called THC and is the psychoactive component of cannabis that’s responsible for the high that users feel.

Like garden variety marijuana, delta-8 THC can be vaped or eaten. However, it’s rarely smoked. Anecdotally, its fans swear by its benefits – that it helps with relaxation and pain relief without intense highs that can veer into anxiety or paranoia.

Yet there’s been a dearth of research on this compound. As public health scholars, we decided to conduct the first survey of delta-8 THC users to find out who was using it, why they were using it and what sort of effects it had.

Get your news from people who know what they’re talking about.Sign up for newsletter
The latest cannabinoid to storm the market

The 2018 Agriculture Improvement Act – also known as the farm bill – legalized the sale of hemp-derived compounds. The widely available CBD is a hemp-derived compound.

Delta-8 THC is another. It’s an isomer, or chemical analog, of THC. The difference is in the position of a double bond in the carbon ring, which makes delta-8 THC have a lower affinity for the CB1 receptor of the endocannabinoid system in our brains. For this reason, it may be less potent than THC and cause a less-intense high.
The chemical structures of delta-9 THC – what’s commonly called THC – and delta-8 THC are strikingly similar; the only difference being the position of a double bond in the carbon ring. 
About time/Getty Images

Natural concentrations of delta-8 THC in cannabis are too low for it to be effectively smoked in raw bud or flower. It needs to be extracted from large amounts of plant material, transformed from another cannabinoid like CBD, or synthesized chemically. The Drug Enforcement Administration considers artificially synthesized delta-8 THC illegal.

Nonetheless, delta-8 THC products have become one of the fastest-growing sectors of the hemp industry. They seem to be especially popular in areas where THC products remain illegal or medical access is very difficult.

There is little research on this component of cannabis. One study from 1973 found that the effects of delta-8 THC mimicked those of THC, but weren’t as intense. Another, published in 1995, suggested that delta-8 THC could be used as a therapeutic treatment for the adverse effects of chemotherapy.

These studies, however, enrolled only a dozen individuals, and few policymakers seem to even be aware of their existence. While delta-8 THC can be bought in convenience stores and hemp shops in many states, over a dozen U.S. states have blocked the sale of delta-8 THC products due to a lack of research on its psychoactive effects and concerns over contamination with heavy metals and other toxic substances.
Clearing the smoke with science

In our study, we collected data via an online survey that was completed by more than 500 participants across 38 states.

Most of our participants consumed delta-8 THC through concentrates that were either eaten as edibles and tinctures or smoked by vaping – methods of ingestion that may be safer than smoking. About half said they used delta-8 THC to treat a health or medical condition, and almost one-third of participants said they exclusively used delta-8 THC to treat a health condition – they didn’t use it just for fun. Common conditions treated were anxiety or panic attacks, chronic pain, depression or bipolar disorder, and stress – afflictions that people also treat with delta-9 THC.

As we expected, participants thought that delta-8 THC had effects that were somewhat less intense compared with THC.

What’s remarkable, though, is how the profiles of their experiences differ.

Compared with THC, delta-8 THC appears to provide similar levels of relaxation and pain relief. While it seems to cause slightly lower levels of euphoria, it also seems to produce fewer cognitive distortions such as an altered sense of time, short-term memory issues and difficulty concentrating. Participants were also much less likely to experience distressing mental states such as anxiety and paranoia. Many participants remarked how they could use delta-8 THC and still be productive, whereas they tended to use THC products recreationally, given its more potent, mind-altering effects.

Most participants reduced or stopped using pharmaceutical drugs, as well as THC products, because they were using delta-8 THC to treat their conditions. They considered delta-8 THC better than pharmaceutical drugs in terms of adverse side effects, addictiveness, withdrawal symptoms, effectiveness, safety, availability and cost.

However, participants weren’t confident that their primary care doctor could integrate medical cannabis into their course of treatment. For this reason, many hadn’t disclosed their use of delta-8 THC as a substitute for pharmaceutical drugs to their doctors.

These patterns demonstrate the need for more research and better education for health care providers on cannabis and its derivatives; there continues to be a disconnect between those who use cannabis to self-medicate and the mainstream health care system.
More to be done

Our findings are just the start. We hope that they’ll spur more sophisticated research, such as double-blind randomized controlled trials that explore its treatment potential for specific conditions. And we still don’t know if some of the effects reported by our participants, both beneficial and harmful, were due to contaminants or expectations – a placebo effect.

Yet even though delta-8 THC products may provide much of the experiential and therapeutic benefits, with lower risks and fewer adverse effects, some states have outright banned delta-8 THC sales. Since many of those same states permit the recreational sale of cannabis and other hemp products, this seems a bit paradoxical.

Criminalizing substances with high consumer demand like delta-8 THC can create a black market and produce even more concerns for consumer safety, as there’s no mechanism for the regulation and protection of consumers.

Cannabis laws remain a patchwork of policies and regulations. With more and more Americans having access to cannabis for medicinal and recreational purposes, we believe it behooves policymakers to advocate for further study of this promising alternative.


Authors
Daniel J. Kruger
Research Assistant Professor, University of Michigan
Jessica S. Kruger
Clinical Assistant Professor of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo
BLACK HISTORY MONTH
Cicely was young, Black and enslaved – her death during an epidemic in 1714 has lessons that resonate in today’s pandemic

Over 1.4 million people have died from COVID-19 so far this year. How history memorializes them will reflect those we most value. 




















Author provided, CC BY-ND

What I believe to be the oldest surviving gravestone for a Black person in the Americas memorializes an enslaved teenager named Cicely.

Cicely’s body is interred across from Harvard’s Johnston Gate in Cambridge, Massachusetts. She died in 1714 during a measles epidemic brought to the college by a student after the summer recess of 1713. Another tombstone in the same burial ground remembers Jane, an enslaved woman who died in 1741 during an outbreak of diphtheria, or “throat distemper.”


A grave marker for an enslaved woman named Jane uses the archaic ‘1740/1’ Julian calendar notation to denote her death in early 1741. Nicole Maskiell, CC BY-ND

When diseases struck in the Colonial era, many city residents fled to the safety of the country. Poor and enslaved people, like Jane and Cicely – the essential frontline workers of the time – stayed behind.

Why were Cicely and Jane memorialized when so many other enslaved people were not? The archival record doesn’t provide a clear answer, but the question of who should be remembered with monuments and commemorations is timely.

Written by academics, edited by journalists, backed by evidence.Get newsletter

Throughout the United States, as COVID-19 affects frontline workers and communities of color far more than other demographic groups, and protesters agitate for racial justice, American society is wrestling with its racial memory and judging which monuments and memorials deserve a place.

Against this backdrop, I believe it’s important to look back at how a few marginalized and oppressed people who served on the front lines of prior epidemics have been treated and remembered. After all, those whom society chooses to memorialize reflect what accomplishments – honorable or horrific – society values.
Unsung sacrifices

The lives, labor and sacrifices of women and girls of color have been overlooked for centuries. Of the 3.5 million books in Widener Library – the centerpiece of Harvard’s vast library system – I found that not one was devoted to Cicely or Jane, and few focus on women like them.

For early-American historians of Northern slavery like me, such fragmentary and untold stories are both intriguing and challenging. But this particular story was also personal, because when I first stumbled on Cicely’s tombstone, I was also a Black teen.

I was a sophomore studying history at Harvard when I came upon the headstone while wandering in the Colonial-era graveyard adjacent to campus. It had a carving of a death’s head on top and winding vines down the sides. It was both ordinary and extraordinary – it looked like other tombstones in the graveyard, but this one memorialized a young Black girl.

I wondered about Cicely. She most likely did domestic work in and around Harvard, as her enslaver was a Cambridge minister and a tutor at the college. But what else did she do during her short life, and why did her enslavers memorialize her with a tombstone? These questions and the mystery of her life inspired me to become a historian. Over the years, I have been passionate about piecing together fragments of her and Jane’s lives.

Jane’s enslaver kept a diary that provided some details about her life, but I found little written about Cicely beyond her adult baptismal record, dated just two months before her death.
Racial unrest and disease

Cicely lived and died during a time of racial unrest and disease. A slave revolt in 1712 in New York City led to several brutal executions and deportations. News of the revolt spread throughout the Colonies, stoking concerns of a wider uprising. Colonists armed themselves in fear.

Slavery existed in every Colony, including the North. At the time of the revolt, the Northern Colonies – from Nova Scotia down to Delaware – were home to around 9,000 enslaved people, representing a third of the enslaved population of the British mainland colonies. New York City had 5,841 residents, of which 975 were held as slaves. Boston had roughly 400 enslaved people.

Racial unrest was quickly followed by contagion. A measles outbreak the next year followed the same path up the coast as news of the revolt had traveled.

The epidemic started in Newport, Rhode Island, in the summer of 1713 and hit Cambridge, Massachusetts, that September. It broke out at Harvard before spreading to Boston. More than 400 Bostonians died – about 18% of them people of color – at a time when Black people were only 4% of the total population.

Racial discord and disease continued throughout the Colonial period. Between Cicely and Jane’s deaths in 1714 and 1741, a smallpox crisis gripped Boston, inflaming racial tensions. An enslaved person named Onesimus helped introduce an early form of inoculation called “variolation.” This technique was practiced on both white and Black Bostonians, to the consternation of many. On its heels, a five-year diphtheria outbreak ravaged New England, killing 5,000 people, including Jane.
History repeats

Much like today, Colonists received mixed messages during disease outbreaks, with some leaders touting the value of inoculations while others stood fast against them. As Jane toiled in the shadow of Harvard in 1740, the male landowners of Cambridge held a contentious election that saw very high voter turnout amid a diphtheria epidemic.

[You’re smart and curious about the world. So are The Conversation’s authors and editors. You can read us daily by subscribing to our newsletter.]

History can show us how diseases disproportionately harm vulnerable and marginalized populations; how discord and strife lead to racial antipathy; and how epidemics are managed and mismanaged.

Cicely’s and Jane’s lives mattered outside of the value they provided to their enslavers. In a time of disease and racial unrest that echoes the experiences of generations past, the lives of oppressed people like Cicely and Jane are worthy of remembrance.


Author
Nicole S. Maskiell
Assistant Professor of History Peter and Bonnie McCausland Fellow of History, University of South Carolina

ICMYI
Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon at record high

DPA
February 03, 2022

A man fishes on the banks of the Limoeiro River. Around 360 square kilometres of rainforest in the Brazilian Amazon were lost to deforestation in January alone.
 
Dieh Sacramento/dpa

A man fishes on the banks of the Limoeiro River. Around 360 square kilometres of rainforest in the Brazilian Amazon were lost to deforestation in January alone. Dieh Sacramento/dpa

Around 360 square kilometres of rainforest in the Brazilian Amazon were lost to deforestation in January alone.

This is the highest amount recorded for January since 2015, the National Institute for Space Research (Inpe) said Wednesday, citing provisional figures.

Inpe uses satellite imagery for its analysis, using a rapid survey to examine the changes to the forest in real time.

The Inpe figures are therefore able to indicate how the official deforestation rate might develop in relation to a given year. The annual rate is for the period from August to July.

At the COP26 UN climate conference, the Brazilian government announced it would end illegal deforestation in the Amazon rainforest by 2028.

Experts fear the latest data could indicate an increased risk of another devastating year for the Amazon.

Between August 2020 and July 2021, some 13,235 square kilometres were deforested in the region, according to Inpe.

This marks a 22 per cent increase on the previous year, and the largest area of deforestation since 2008.

2019 was the first year in office for Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. The right-wing leader was criticized over the devastating fires in the Amazon.

Environmentalists accuse him of accepting the fires as a way to open up new land for agriculture. Brazil has also weakened its environmental and monitoring authorities.