Monday, February 14, 2022

Threats, attacks, and insults: Canadian reporters on covering vaccine mandate protests

 
Truckers and their supporters protest against COVID-19 restrictions and mandates in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, February 10, 2022. (Reuters/Patrick Doyle)

Features & Analysis
By Rebecca Redelmeier/CPJ Audience Engagement Associate on February 11, 2022

“Fake news.” “Go home.” “You’re the virus.” These are just a few of the insults that protesters have hurled at Evan Solomon, a reporter at national Canadian broadcaster CTV, and his colleagues as they have covered demonstrations against COVID-19 restrictions in Ottawa.

The protests – which began in Canada’s capital in late January to counter vaccine mandates for truckers – are now targeting border crossings in other parts of the country and interfering with supply chains, prompting Ontario premier Doug Ford to declare a state of emergency Friday.

But as reporters seek to cover these developments, they are being threatened in the streets and online. The incidents mirror the experiences of journalists in the United States and Europe, who have been shouted at and even assaulted while reporting on anti-vaccine protests.

CPJ spoke with Solomon, who also hosts a program on the radio platform iHeartRadio, and Elizabeth Payne, a reporter at the Ottawa Citizen, to learn more about the situation on the ground and what reporters are doing to protect themselves. The interviews have been edited for length and clarity.
In this screenshot of a CTV broadcast, reporter Evan Solomon interviews protesters against COVID-19 restrictions in Ottawa.

What has it been like reporting in Ottawa?

Evan Solomon: I’m out there every day doing stand ups with them [the protesters] and speaking with them. It’s very passionate. There’s lots of yelling. You have anger and frustration at the vaccine mandates and the imposition of what many people think is an infringement on their civil rights and civil liberties. People will threaten you, people will throw things at you – that’s all happened to me. If you have a big news camera, then you’re a target. If you have a light, then you’re a target.

I would say 90 percent of the time I feel safe during the day. But any journalist out there, all of us, are almost always yelled at. “You don’t tell the full story.” “How do you sleep at night?” “You’re all liars.” [Protesters] also film you the whole time.

I’m a 6-foot-4 white guy. That’s important because a lot of these protesters are also white men. It’s hard for them to intimidate me because I’m a big person. But there are a lot of female reporters who get significantly more harassment than I do – verbal and online. They get horrific messages, dirty messages, chauvinist messages, racist messages.

On January 29, a protester threw a beer can at you. What happened?

Just before I did a live hit, as I was speaking, a guy ran up and drilled a full beer can at me and missed my head by about six inches. It hit our camera equipment, one of those big hard shell camera cases, and blew up in the case. We actually had a security guard and there were lots of police around, and the security guard saw the beer can and yelled at me to duck. I didn’t hear him though because the horns of the protest were so loud.

What steps have you taken to protect yourself while covering the protests?

Now, when [CTV] journalists are filming outside, we have to have a security person with us. We’re all using DSLR cameras, which are small cameras, so we do not bring tripods, we do not bring lights. You make sure you’re mobile in case things get out of hand. Our colleagues at CTV Edmonton have peeled off the stickers from their cars that identify them.

How does it feel to have to take these precautions?

The idea that I am a journalist in a G7 democracy, and my company says I can’t do my job without a security guard – in Ottawa, Ontario – that’s pretty remarkable.

There’s a general sense that attacking journalists is now normal. It has become acceptable to harass journalists. We saw during the Trump era the president of the United States actively saying, “You are fake news, you are the enemy of the people.” That raised the temperature in the U.S. and certainly we’re seeing it raised in a similar way here in Canada. We’re seeing an echo of it.

What do you think is fueling threats against journalists in Canada and what should be done to try to end them?

I think there’s a lot of people who do not feel represented in the media. They have not heard their own voice. And there’s been a business of peddling mistrust. There’s a war on truth and facts and doctors and scientists and governments and media. But our job is to keep hammering at the facts. Sometimes that’s very unpopular. But there’s not two sides of a fact, and we have to stick to those.

The job is to cover stories in difficult circumstances. We are in a difficult circumstance. There is not only a populist movement that has its own tools of media to counteract the established tools, but there’s a culture war based on truth and facts, there’s a heavy distrust of institutions and governments that is now part of the political process, and journalists have to cover that. The only weapons that we have are hewing closely to factual information and hewing closely to human stories that resonate.

Ottawa Citizen reporter Elizabeth Payne is covering Ottawa protests against COVID-19 restrictions without a mask out of a concern that protesters would view it as a “provocation.” (Ottawa Citizen/Ashley Fraser)

Have you seen anything like these protests in your 35 years covering Ottawa?

Elizabeth Payne: I have never experienced this before in my city. There’s a lot of people who have been threatened. I’ve concentrated a lot of my writing on the impact [the protests] are having on people who live [downtown]. People have been calling me and begging me to take any reference that may identify them out of stories and it’s because they’re getting death threats.

These streets are generally boring and dull. So there’s a bit of a cognitive dissonance. It takes you a little longer to assess a situation as potentially dangerous. If I was somewhere else perhaps I would be more on my guard. It’s unsettling and strange.

What are your safety concerns when reporting in the crowd?

There’s a lot of potential for things to go badly. That’s what’s nerve-wracking right now: you could be out there and you could be talking to people and stuff could suddenly start to shift. You really do have to look around and make sure you have something solid behind you. You don’t just walk into a crowd without thinking about where you are and where the egress may be.

I’m also not wearing a mask. I would wear a mask right now in crowds like I’ve seen here, but my decision not to wear a mask is because it’s a provocation to these people. That makes me less safe. I’m sure I’ve been exposed to COVID many times – you’re shoulder to shoulder with people. I’m triple-vaxxed, I’ve been very, very careful over two years about not getting COVID, and it wouldn’t at all surprise me if I did during this. I could wear a mask – no one has told me not to – but it would make my job a lot harder. I would be subject no doubt to harassment.

What steps do you take to mitigate risk while covering the protests?

I don’t go out at night among the crowds. We always have the option of going with another reporter. I’m in touch before I go to find out who else is out there and where they are.

It’s very fortunate to be a print reporter. I watch broadcast reporters getting hassled all the time. But, as a print reporter, I can slide through. All I need is a tape recorder in my pocket and a very small notepad and my phone.

Have you faced any harassment – online or in the field – related to your coverage?

I certainly get a lot of Twitter harassment – people calling me vile names. It can be disturbing, but it’s also easy to delete, ignore, and block. I did get one phone call in the middle of the night that was worrisome. Someone called me a “stupid cunt.” I hung up quickly and did not feel threatened as much as annoyed and unhappy.

I believe it was during the first weekend of protests. I had written a story reporting that ambulances had been pelted with rocks and needed police escorts and that health and social workers were harassed.

How do you interpret anti-media sentiment at these protests?

Half of the signs posted along Parliament Hill [where the protesters have gathered] have to do with how the media are liars and can’t be trusted. It’s such a constant theme. Even people who are sincerely speaking to me will pause for a small rant about how everybody lies and you can’t be trusted. It’s in Canadian social media as well.

I think it’s all part of the conspiracy theories – that everybody is out to get you and the media are a part of that and people are lying to you and you can’t trust people. It’s not a side issue; it’s very much central to the belief system. In a way, I feel that by listening, I am at least doing my part to keep the lines open.


Rebecca Redelmeier is CPJ’s audience engagement associate. Previously, she developed reports and data stories about how online audiences engage with content for NewsWhip, and worked as a reporter for Daily Maverick in South Africa.

Mexican journalist Heber López shot and killed in Oaxaca, suspects arrested


Mexican journalist Heber López was recently shot and killed in Oaxaca after publishing an article accusing a former official of corruption.
 (Screenshot: Imagen Noticias/YouTube)

Mexico City, February 12, 2022 – Mexican authorities must thoroughly and transparently investigate the killing of journalist Heber López Vásquez, determine whether he was targeted for his work, and ensure those responsible are brought to justice, the Committee to Protect Journalists said Saturday.

In the afternoon of Thursday, February 10, a group of at least two men shot and killed López as he was about to enter a home in the coastal city of Salina Cruz, in Oaxaca state, according to news reports and information provided to CPJ by César González, a spokesperson for the Oaxaca state prosecutor’s office.

The men fled the scene, and municipal police officers chased and arrested the suspected shooters shortly after the attack, González told CPJ. Oaxaca State Prosecutor Arturo Peimbert told the La Jornada newspaper that he could not provide details on a possible motive in the killing, but did not rule out López’s journalism.

López, founder and editor of the NoticiasWeb news website, is the fifth member of the press killed in Mexico in less than six weeks. Reporters José Luis Gamboa and Lourdes Maldonado, photographer Margarito Martínez, and media worker Roberto Toledo in Zitácuaro have all been killed since mid-January.

“With the brutal killing of Heber López, the fifth such attack in less than six weeks, Mexico continues an unprecedented and shocking string of deadly attacks against journalists,” said Jan-Albert Hootsen, CPJ’s Mexico representative. “These killings will only stop with genuine, decisive actions by Mexican authorities, who must determine whether López was killed because of his work and bring all those involved to justice.”

López, 39, founded and edited NoticiasWeb and RCP Noticias, and previously worked as reporter for the Meganoticias broadcaster, according to Oaxaca-based news website Página 3, which said he had worked as a journalist for about 18 years.

NoticiasWeb and RCP Noticias both publish most of their reporting on their Facebook pages, and have about 135,000 followers in total. Both outlets cover general news, politics, crime, corruption, and security in the region. NoticiasWeb recently covered a scuffle between supporters of political parties, the detention of undocumented migrants, and an accident that killed a worker. RCP Noticias recently posted stories about the arrest of a local police commander and the COVID-19 pandemic.

The day before his killing, López published a short article accusing Arminda Espinosa Cartas, a former municipal official in Salina Cruz, of corruption, and alleged that she tried to coerce locals to vote for her in municipal elections due to be held next month.

Multiple news articles published on February 11 identified one of the arrested suspects as Espinosa Cartas’ brother, only identified as “Ricardo N.” When CPJ asked González if that reporting was accurate, he declined to comment.

CPJ messaged Espinosa Cartas at her Facebook account for comment, but did not receive any reply. CPJ was unable to find any public statements by Espinosa Cartas or the two suspects.

When CPJ called López’s brother, who is also a journalist, he asked not to be identified by name out of concern for his safety, and said he could not comment on whether his brother had received any threats over his work.

On Friday, Mexican federal undersecretary for Human Rights Alejandro Encinas wrote on his Twitter account that the government’s Federal Mechanism for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders and Journalists was including López’s family in a protection program.

Mexico is the deadliest country for journalists in the Western Hemisphere, according to CPJ research. At least three journalists were killed in direct relation to their work in 2021 alone. CPJ is investigating another eleven killings in 2021 and 2022, as well as the disappearance of a reporter in Sonora last year, to determine whether they were related to the journalists’ work.
Egypt: Germany to link arms sales with human rights record

For three consecutive years, Egypt has been the top recipient of German arms despite concerns about President Sisi's human rights abuses


Germany's foreign minister Annalena Baerbock at a news conference with Egyptian counterpart Sameh Shoukry 
(not pictured) in Cairo, Egypt, 12 February 2022 (Reuters)

By MEE correspondent
Published date: 13 February 2022 

Germany's foreign minister Annalena Baerbock said on Saturday that human rights criteria will play a role in her government's decision to sell arms to allies, including Egypt.

Baerbock made the comments during a press conference with her Egyptian counterpart Sameh Shoukry in the last leg of her first visit to the Middle East after the coalition government came to power in December.

The coalition government, which includes Baerbock's Green party along with the centre-left Social Democrats and the neo-liberal Free Democrats (FDP), has vowed to reduce arms sales to countries outside the EU and Nato.

Egypt: US senator introduces bill to stop latest arms sale
Read More »

The top German diplomat said that a bill due to be introduced later this year will stipulate no exceptions to the "restrictive policy" of arms exports, except in justified individual cases, and after a careful review.

"The human rights situation already plays an important role here," she pointed out, adding that "this will also have an impact on countries that have so far been major recipients of German arms exports."

Omid Nouripour, a Green Party politician, recently told the German news agency that arms exports to Egypt and Saudi Arabia should be withheld.

"There are more than 60,000 political prisoners in Egypt, a double-digit number of prisons have been newly built for this purpose," said Nouripour.

Baerbock also met with President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi in Cairo, and said they discussed the human rights situation, without providing details, the German news channel DW reported.

In the last three years, Egypt has been the top recipient of German arms sales globally.

In 2021, sales to Egypt boosted Germany's total record exports of €9.35bn ($10.65bn), up by 61 percent from the previous year.

A significant part of the latest sales were maritime and air defence weapons to Egypt, AP reported last month. Total German arms sales to Egypt in 2021 amounted to 4.3 billion.


In response to Baerbock's remarks, Shoukry said that a strong Egyptian military is crucial for the security and stability of Europe.

"What the navy has done in impeding any kind of illegal immigration since September 2016 to Europe, I think, is of the utmost interest to our partners in Europe," he said during Saturday's press conference.
Crackdown on human rights

Western arms exports to the Egyptian government have been condemned by international rights groups as a green light for more human rights abuses.

Human Rights Watch has accused Sisi of overseeing the worst crackdown on human rights in the country's modern history, including mass killings of protesters opposed to his coup in 2013, and subsequent repression of peaceful opposition after Sisi became president in 2014.


EU plans joint bid with Egypt to lead global counter-terrorism body
Read More »

The German foreign ministry in December issued a statement denouncing the sentencing of three Egyptian activists to five years in prison, which Cairo rejected as "unacceptable and unjustified meddling in internal affairs".

Earlier in February, close to 200 frontline European politicians signed a letter calling on the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) to establish a monitoring and reporting mechanism on Egypt to address the country's "human rights crisis".

The letter urged the UNHRC to take "resolute action" ahead of the council's upcoming session in March.

It accused the international community of a "persistent failure to take any meaningful action to address Egypt's human rights crisis."

"This failure, along with continued support to the Egyptian government and reluctance to even speak up against pervasive abuses, has only deepened the Egyptian authorities' sense of impunity," it said.

Egypt: Opposition activist begins hunger strike over three year pre-trial detention

Walid Shawky has been in prison since October 2018 over allegations of belonging to a 'terrorist' organisation


A picture taken on 16 January 2022 shows the Correctional and Rehabilitation Centre in Badr city, 65 kms east of Cairo (AFP)

By MEE staff
Published date: 14 February 2022 
A prominent opposition activist in Egypt began a hunger strike on Sunday in protest at more than three years in detention, according to a rights group.

Walid Shawky, a member of the secular April 6 Movement, has been detained since 2018, accused of "belonging to a terrorist organisation," a charge routinely levelled at opposition activists in the country.

Though the 35-year-old dentist was ordered released after the end of the maximum two-year pre-trial detention period, he was never freed, instead having new charges of belonging to a "terrorist" group levelled against him.

The Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights (EIPR) added he was also accused of participating in anti-government demonstrations in 2020, despite having been in detention at that time.

'Catastrophic' rights record

Egypt is thought to have more than 60,000 political prisoners and is regularly singled out for its human rights record, which Amnesty International has described as "catastrophic".

Rights groups have accused Egyptian authorities of maintaining a policy of medical negligence, torture, and ill-treatment of political prisoners, resulting in the death of 49 people in 2021. Six died in December.


Egypt: 42-year-old political prisoner dies after denial of medical care
Read More »

According to the Arab Organisation for Human Rights, the number of deaths in custody since July 2013 has reached 918.

President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi came to power after ousting his democratically elected predecessor Mohamed Morsi in a military coup in 2013.

Since then, Sisi has been accused by local and international rights groups of overseeing the country's worst crackdown on human rights in its modern history.

Morsi himself suffered from poor health during his five years of detention, before collapsing in court and dying in June 2019.

The UN high commissioner for human rights accused Egyptian authorities of "arbitrarily killing" the 67-year-old Morsi, who was kept in a "brutal condition" in Tora prison.
'Israel not winning PR fight': Amnesty chief discusses 'apartheid' report
Mohamed Hashem
9 February 2022 

Sheikh Jarrah: Israel renews assault on Palestinians for second tense night

Police and settlers ramp up attacks on residents of the East Jerusalem neighbourhood, turning it into a 'war zone'


Israeli security forces arrest a Palestinian man in the East Jerusalem neighbourhood of Sheikh Jarrah on 13 February 2022 (AFP)

By Huthifa Fayyad
Published date: 13 February 2022

Sheikh Jarrah has witnessed a second night of violent Israeli police and settler assaults, turning the occupied East Jerusalem neighbourhood into a "war zone", Palestinian residents said late on Sunday.

At least 31 people were injured, including medics and a journalist, after Israeli forces used stun grenades and rubber-coated steel bullets to disperse Palestinian crowds, according to local media. Six people have been taken to hospital.

Skunk water vehicles and mounted police were also deployed. At least 12 Palestinians were arrested.

Dozens of Palestinian supporters had gathered late in the evening in and around the Salem family home, who are facing imminent expulsion, to stand in solidarity with the family against settler raids.

A group of settlers, led by far-right Knesset member Itamar Ben-Gvir, had erected a tent on land adjacent to the Salems' home in the morning and set up a parliamentary office station there.

Dancing and singing racist, Islamophobic chants, settlers were seen provoking the family, at times assaulting them.

Sheikh Jarrah: Israeli settlers storm home of Palestinian family facing expulsion
Read More »

Scuffles between the two crowds inside the property erupted periodically throughout the evening. Outside, activists were denied entry by security forces, who closed off all access points into the house for the Palestinians.

Activist Muna al-Kurd, a resident of Sheikh Jarrah who is also facing imminent expulsion, said in her Instagram live updates that the scene in the area looks like a "war zone".

Ramzi Abbasi, a Jerusalem activist who documents Israeli assaults in the city, echoed a similar sentiment.

"It's like military barracks in here," Abbasi said on his Instagram live updates reporting from the ground. "It's very reminiscent of the situation that preceded the Sheikh Jarrah uprising last year."

The neighbourhood has been a significant flashpoint since May, after Israel tried to expel Palestinian families from the area to make way for Israeli settlers.

This prompted widespread protests across the occupied West Bank and the 48 Palestinian community inside Israel, as well as a large-scale military operation in the besieged Gaza Strip.

Looming expulsion

The violence on Sunday night followed a tense morning in the neighbourhood after Ben-Gvir announced a day earlier that he intended to open his office in Sheikh Jarrah on a plot of land belonging to the Salem family that was confiscated by settler groups in January.

Ben-Gvir is head of the Jewish Power party, part of the Religious Zionism political alliance that calls for the eviction of Palestinians from their lands and running Israel according to Torah texts.

Following the announcement on Saturday, dozens of settlers raided the neighbourhood just after midnight, throwing stones at Palestinian homes and damaging cars.

Sheikh Jarrah: Neighbourhood's resilient women say 'we will not leave'
Read More »

Settlers then reached the house of the Salem family and assaulted women and children with pepper spray, residents told Anadolu agency.

"They came out of nowhere and pepper-sprayed me and my neighbour, Abu Mohammad. My eyes were burning and I couldn't open them. I couldn't breathe," Fatima Salem said.

The Salem family has been fighting for decades in courts against settler claims over their home.

In 1987, Fatima Salem was ordered by an Israeli court to vacate the house on claims that she couldn't prove her residence there before the death of her parents. Salem says she was born in the house and has lived there since.

She now lives in the house with her son and daughter and their families.

The 1987 decision was frozen in the same year but the case was reactivated in 2015. In December 2021, the family was given a final eviction notice.

Last week, authorities informed the Salems that they have until the beginning March to leave the house.

Currently, 37 Palestinian families live in Sheikh Jarrah, six of them facing imminent eviction. Since 2020, Israeli courts have ordered the eviction of 13 Palestinian families from Sheikh Jarrah.

This article is available in French on Middle East Eye French edition.
How Russia hooked Europe on its oil and gas – and overcame US efforts to prevent energy dependence on Moscow


Is it a weapon or merely trade? AP Photo/Dmitry Lovetsky

February 12, 2022 

The Biden administration hopes its threat of “severe economic consequences” deters Russia from invading Ukraine – an event Americans officials say could be imminent.

In response, the U.S. said it may ban the export of microchips and other technologies to critical sectors like artificial intelligence and aerospace and freeze the personal assets of Russian President Vladimir Putin, among other sanctions. Meanwhile, the Senate is preparing its own “mother of all sanctions” – such as against Russian banks and government debt – that could take effect even if Putin ultimately stands down from a military confrontation.

The U.S. and its allies have been stressing – as seen in President Joe Biden’s Feb. 7, 2022, meeting with the German chancellor – that they are united on the consequences for Russia should it invade.

But Russia has something that may undercut that solidarity: a network of European countries, Germany in particular, dependent on it for energy exports, especially natural gas. That may make them reluctant to go along with severe U.S. sanctions.

This dependence didn’t happen overnight. And as I’ve learned while working on a book on U.S. economic warfare against the USSR during the Cold War, this issue has tended to divide America and its allies – in part because of how Russia has exploited the ambiguity of its intentions.

A Cold War concern

The U.S. has long speculated about Russian willingness to use trade to tie the hands of other countries - a concern dating back to the early days of the Cold War.

For example, in the late 1950s and 1960s, as the USSR and the U.S. were competing for postwar hegemony, each side tried to influence countries not formally aligned with either superpower. Some American analysts warned of a “Soviet economic offensive.” This included Soviet efforts to use favorable trade deals and other economic assistance to Warsaw Pact countries and neutral targets like Finland, the United Arab Republic and India in a manner that created sustained dependence on Moscow, possibly enabling future Kremlin coercion.

Other analysts disagreed and thought Soviet trade was largely motivated by economics. So did American allies – especially Britain – which resisted American calls to restrict strategic trade with the Soviet Bloc and other efforts to curb their Soviet trade prospects.

These different perspectives demonstrate the ambiguity of Soviet intentions. Given the Cold War rivalry and the USSR’s status as a centralized, state-run economy, Moscow’s motives were not clear.

JFK fights an oil pipeline

As the Soviet Union began developing oil and gas pipelines to Europe, European energy dependence on Russia became a particular concern in Washington.

In the 1960s, Western Europe only imported 6% of its oil from the Soviet bloc. But a new planned oil pipeline – running all the way from the Russian far east, through several European countries including Ukraine and Poland, and terminating in Germany – suggested the Soviets hoped to change that. The prospect of greater dependence, as well as other strategic concerns, raised alarm bells in Washington.

In 1963, the Kennedy administration attempted to stall construction of the Druzhba, or “Friendship,” Oil Pipeline by pushing an embargo on wide-diameter pipe to Soviet-aligned countries. Knowing it could not stop the project alone, it pressured allies – especially West Germany, a major pipe exporter – to join.

While Britain refused, West Germany reluctantly agreed, permitting a partial NATO embargo.

Nonetheless, the pipeline was completed a year later with only minor delays.

Reagan’s gas gambit sparks crisis

About two decades later, the Reagan administration faced a similar dilemma.

In 1981, the Soviet Union was building a natural gas pipeline from Siberia to Western Europe. Seeing it as another threat, the Reagan administration tried to persuade European allies such as France and Germany to join its embargo of not only pipeline equipment for the project but financing too. They refused, and the U.S. responded with sanctions intended to prevent European companies from providing money or equipment to the project.

The gambit sparked an intra-Western crisis, sowing division between the U.S. and Europe, and resulting in a sanctions retreat just a few months later.

The pipeline was completed in 1984.

Wielding energy dependence as a weapon

The consequences of energy dependence on Russia began to manifest itself after the Soviet collapse in 1991 and the rise of Vladimir Putin a decade later. Unlike his Soviet predecessors, who refrained from shutting off energy exports, Putin has shown a willingness to conflate economic and geopolitical objectives in Russian energy policy, applying timely pressure on neighbors that he justifies in market terms.

In the mid-2000s, for example, Ukraine was still receiving the same heavily subsidized gas shipments from Russia as it did when it was part of the Soviet Union a few years earlier. The “Orange Revolution” near the end of 2004 led to the ouster of a pro-Kremlin leader, replacing him with one who sought closer ties with the West. A year later, Gazprom demanded Ukraine pay full market rates for its gas.

When Ukraine refused, Russia restricted the flow of gas through the pipelines – leaving only enough to fulfill its contracts to countries in Western Europe. To many observers, the move seemed aimed at destabilizing the pro-Western government in Kyiv. It was also later used as the basis for claims that Ukraine was an unreliable gas transit country, which helped build support for a new pipeline named Nord Stream that directly channeled gas from Russia to Germany.

That pipeline opened up in 2011 and resulted in the annual loss to Ukraine of US$720 million in transit fees. Nord Stream also significantly increased German energy dependence on Russia, which by 2020 was supplying an estimated 50% to 75% of its natural gas, up from 35% in 2015. Natural gas is used not only to power industry but also for heating and to generate electricity in Germany.

That pipeline is now responsible for a third of all Russian gas exports to Europe. As a result, Russian gas exports to Europe reached a record level in 2021 – despite U.S. efforts to ramp up exports of liquefied natural gas to Europe.

Europe got a glimpse of the potential consequences of this dependence in December 2021, when Russia reduced its gas exports to Europe as the crisis involving Ukraine was heating up. Although Russia was still technically meeting its contracts, it stopped selling additional gas as it had in the past. The next month, the International Energy Agency accused Russia of destabilizing European energy security.

Will Putin do it again?


Russia has reportedly amassed about 130,000 troops on its border with Ukraine - surrounding the country on three sides.

While Putin’s intentions remain unclear, the U.S. is leading efforts to deter a potential invasion by showing that its Western allies are on board with devastating sanctions - including Biden’s promise to thwart a new $11 billion pipeline running from Russia to Germany known as Nord Stream 2.

But Europe’s – and specifically Germany’s – already-significant dependence on Russia for energy make them vulnerable given Russia’s history of threatening to cut off gas supplies to its neighbors – and sometimes following through. This could potentially undermine the West’s ability to execute a coordinated sanctions campaign.

For example, an energy crisis in winter could be a disaster for Germany, and fear of it may weaken German willingness to act against Russia. A recent example of potential German softness toward Russia can be seen in German Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s failure to endorse stopping the Nord Stream 2 pipeline as a potential sanction for an invasion.

Russia’s use of trade and energy to create dependencies has given it a strong hand – one that the U.S. and its European allies have limited options to counter.

Author
Ryan Haddad
Research Affiliate at the Ed Snider Center for Enterprise and Markets, University of Maryland



Studies: Three More '72 Dolphins Players Had Brain Disease Tied to Concussions

(Feng Yu/Dreamstime.com)

By Luca Cacciatore | Saturday, 12 February 2022 02:03 PM

Posthumous studies of three more 1972 Miami Dolphins football players have shown they suffered from chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a brain disease linked to repeated head trauma only detectable after death, the South Florida Sun Sentinel reported on Friday.

Jim Kiick, Nick Buoniconti and Jake Scott were all found to suffer from the most severe Stage 4 of the disease by the CTE Center at Boston University.

Two years ago, the Boston CTE Center found that '72 Dolphins players Earl Morrall, Bob Kuechenberg and Bill Stanfill all suffered from advanced stages of the degenerative affliction.

In 1972, the six Dolphins players had completed the NFL's only undefeated season with a Super Bowl win against the Washington Redskins in Los Angeles.

Scott was named the Super Bowl's Most Valuable Player in that year's big game, with two interceptions to seal a 14-7 victory. Buoniconti had another interception in the game, and Kiick scored the second touchdown.

A profile in The New York Times on Saturday paid homage to the family of the three men; all three players began deteriorating at a similar age.

"He was the guy I looked up to my whole life, so to see him deteriorate, I tried to shut my eyes to it," said Austin Kiick, the son of Jim Kiick. "No kid wants to put their parents in a home. But you could see things were happening to him.

"We probably lost our dad five, six years ago, not one, two years ago," Austin added.

"He'd have a whole conversation with people who didn't have a clue who he was," Scott's friend, Richie Hall, said.

"Nick called the shots until he couldn't," said Nick Buoniconti's widowed wife, Lynn Buoniconti.

US will support India’s rise and regional leadership: Joe Biden

This is part of the administration’s strategic vision for the region that the United States believes will shape the trajectory of the 21st century
DESPITE ITS HINDU NATIONALIST VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTSJoe Biden.

Anita Joshua   |   New Delhi   |   Published 13.02.22, 01:15 AM

The US will support India’s “continued rise and regional leadership” as part of its Indo-Pacific strategy to firmly anchor Washington in the region facing China’s “harmful behaviour”, the Joe Biden administration announced on Friday.

This is part of the administration’s strategic vision for the region that the US believes will shape the trajectory of the 21st century.

Of the view that the prosperity of everyday Americans is linked to the region, the Indo-Pacific Strategy of the United States document says that “American interests can only be advanced if we firmly anchor the United States in the Indo-Pacific and strengthen the region itself, alongside our closest allies and partners”.

The document added that the intensifying focus was due in part to the challenges posed by China.

“The PRC (People’s Republic of China) is combining its economic, diplomatic, military, and technological might as it pursues a sphere of influence in the Indo-Pacific and seeks to become the world’s most influential power. The PRC’s coercion and aggression spans the globe, but it is most acute in the Indo-Pacific.

“From the economic coercion of Australia to the conflict along the Line of Actual Control with India to the growing pressure on Taiwan and bullying of neighbours in the East and South China Seas, our allies and partners in the region bear much of the cost of the PRC’s harmful behaviour,” the strategy document says.

Elaborating on how the US plans to support India’s continued rise and regional leadership, the document states: “We will continue to build a strategic partnership in which the United States and India work together and through regional groupings to promote stability in South Asia; collaborate in new domains, such as health, space, and cyber space; deepen our economic and technology cooperation; and contribute to a free and open Indo-Pacific.

“We recognise that India is a like-minded partner and leader in South Asia and the Indian Ocean, active in and connected to Southeast Asia, a driving force of the Quad and other regional fora, and an engine for regional growth and development.”

The Quad is an axis formed by India, the US, Australia and Japan.

Briefing journalists on the new strategic document, a senior US administration official acknowledged India’s role in the Quad and maintained that it was in a “very different place” compared to the other members. The official had been asked specifically about the possibility of an AUKUS-like defence pact with India. AUKUS is a trilateral security agreement between Australia, the UK and the US.

“India is in a very different place, in many ways, than Australia, than other countries. But India faces very significant challenges. And I think that, you know, China’s behaviour in the Line of Actual Control has had a galvanising impact on India,” the official said.

Underscoring the importance of the partnership with India, which has bipartisan support in the US Congress, the official said: “We see tremendous opportunities in working with another democracy, with a country that has a maritime tradition that understands the importance of the global commons to advance critical issues in the region.”

Hijab ban in Indian state violates religious freedom: US official

US ambassador-at-large for International Religious Freedom slams hijab ban by the southern Indian state, drawing a sharp response from India.

The dispute over hijab erupted last month when a college in Karnataka barred hijab-wearing students from attending classes
[File: Anushree Fadnavis/Reuters]


Published On 12 Feb 2022

A US official has voiced concerns about the controversial banning of the headscarf at schools and colleges in the southern Indian state of Karnataka, prompting a strongly worded rebuttal from New Delhi.

Rashad Hussain, the US ambassador-at-large for International Religious Freedom, said in a tweet on Friday that the hijab ban would stigmatise and marginalise women and girls.

“Religious freedom includes the ability to choose one’s religious attire,” Hussain tweeted.

“The Indian state of Karnataka should not determine permissibility of religious clothing. Hijab bans in schools violate religious freedom and stigmatize and marginalize women and girls.”

On Saturday, India’s external affairs ministry hit back at what it called “motivated comments” on its internal issues, adding that the case was under judicial examination.

“Our constitutional framework and mechanisms, as well as our democratic ethos and polity, are the context in which issues are considered and resolved. … Motivated comments on our internal issues are not welcome,” said ministry spokesman Arindam Bagchi.

The dispute erupted last month, when a group of Muslim students protested after they were barred from entering their college because they were wearing hijab – a headscarf that many Muslim women wear. Since then several other colleges have seen protests both for and against the hijab ban, with Hindu right-wing groups wearing saffron shawls holding protests against hijab.
International reaction

On Tuesday a hijab-wearing Muslim student was heckled by a Hindu far-right mob at a college in Karnataka state, causing outrage.

The news prompted Nobel Prize winner Malala Yousafzai to urge Indian leaders to stop the marginalisation of Muslim women. “College is forcing us to choose between studies and the hijab,” she tweeted on Tuesday.

Manchester United and French international Paul Pogba also expressed concern for Muslim women in Karnataka, sharing a video on Instagram with the caption “Hindutva mobs continue to harass Muslim girls wearing hijab to college in India”. Hindutva is the Hindu supremacist ideology that inspires the governing BJP in India.

Last February, New Delhi reacted sharply to tweets by singer Rihanna and climate change activist Greta Thunberg in solidarity with protesting farmers, saying the celebrities needed “a proper understanding of the issues”. The farmers’ protests lasted for a year until the Modi government repealed three farm laws – the main demands of farmers.

On February 5, the southern state government led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) banned clothes that “disturb equality, integrity and public order”.

The Karnataka high court on Thursday deferred its decision in response to a petition filed by a group of Muslim women against the hijab ban.

A three-judge panel will hear the case again on Monday to decide if schools and colleges can order students not to wear the hijab in classrooms. The court, meanwhile, has asked students not to wear hijab in colleges.

Activists have said the hijab ban is part of the BJP’s anti-Muslim agenda and contravened India’s constitution, which guarantees the right to religion to every citizen. Since Modi came to power, attacks against minorities, particularly Muslims, have gone up.

Muslim students earlier told Al Jazeera that the college decision was shocking as they were allowed to attend colleges with their hijab until very recently. They argued the constitution allowed Indians to wear clothes of their choice and display religious symbols.

Activists and opposition leaders have also criticised the Karnataka state for passing anti-conversion law and anti-cow slaughter law last year, which they say is aimed at targeting Christians and Muslims.

Indian Muslim Students Say Hijab Ban Forces Choice Of Religion Or Education

By Sunil Kataria
02/12/22 AT 3:37 AM
Women hold placards during a protest, organised by Hum Bhartiya, against the recent hijab ban in few colleges of Karnataka state, on the outskirts of Mumbai, India, February 11, 2022.
 Photo: Reuters / FRANCIS MASCARENHAS

Ayesha Imthiaz, a devout Indian Muslim who considers wearing a hijab an expression of devotion to the Prophet Mohammad, says a move by her college to expel hijab-wearing girls is an insult that will force her to choose between religion and education.

"The humiliation of being asked to leave my classroom for wearing a head scarf by college officials has shaken my core belief," said the 21-year-old student from southern Karnataka's Udupi district, where protests over the head covering ban began.

"My religion has been questioned and insulted by a place which I had considered as a temple of education," she told Reuters.

"It is more like telling us you chose between your religion or education, that's a wrong thing," she said after studying for five years at the Mahatma Gandhi Memorial college in Udupi.

Several Muslim girls who protested the ban had received threatening calls and were forced to stay indoors, she added.

College officials say students are allowed to wear the hijab on campus and only asked them to take it off inside the classroom.

Udupi is one of three districts in Karnataka's religiously sensitive coastal region, which is a stronghold of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's right-wing Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

The stand-off has increased fear and anger among minority Muslims, who say the country's constitution grants them the freedom to wear what they want. Protests over the ban have escalated, with hundreds demonstrating this month in Kolkata and Chennai.

Last week, a judge at the state's high court referred petitions challenging the ban to a larger panel.

The issue is being closely watched internationally as a test of religious freedom guaranteed by the Indian Constitution.


The U.S. Office of International Religious Freedom (IRF) on Friday said the hijab bans "violate religious freedom and stigmatize and marginalize women and girls."

In response, India's foreign ministry on Saturday said outside comments over internal issues were not welcome and the matter was under judicial review.

Imthiaz and six other Muslim girls protesting the ban say they are determined to fight for their religious freedom in the face of some hardline Hindu students and even some of their friends.

"It is really hurtful to see our own friends going against us and telling 'I have a problem with you wearing the hijab'...its affected our bonds and mental health," Imthiaz said.

(Writing by Rupam Jain; Editing by Lincoln Feast.)

CPJ, rights groups, and publications call for release of Fahad Shah and other Kashmiri journalists


February 14, 2022

Mr. Manoj Sinha
Lieutenant Governor, Jammu and Kashmir
rajbhawan@jk.gov.in
adsecy.rb-jk@nic.in
ps.rb-jk@nic.in

Sent via email

Dear Lt. Governor Manoj Sinha,

We, the undersigned 58 press freedom organizations, human rights organizations, and publications write to request your urgent intervention to secure the immediate release of Fahad Shah, editor of the online news portal The Kashmir Walla, from jail, and the withdrawal of all police investigations launched into his journalistic work.

On February 4, authorities arrested Shah at the Pulwama police station, where he had been summoned earlier that day for questioning. The first information report states that Shah is being investigated for alleged sedition and making statements causing public mischief, and unlawful activities under the anti-terror Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. Prior to his arrest, police had questioned Shah regarding The Kashmir Walla’s coverage of a gunfight between government forces and militants.

Shah is well known to many in South Asia and around the world as a journalist of high integrity. His writing for The Nation magazine was recognized at the 2021 Human Rights Press Awards. His reporting on events in Jammu and Kashmir is a public service, not a crime, and should be protected under Indian law.

We also urge you to arrange the immediate release of other detained Kashmiri journalists– Sajad GulAasif Sultan, and Manan Gulzar Dar – all of whom, like Shah, have been jailed under anti-terror or preventative detention laws in apparent retaliation for their work.

Since the abrogation of Jammu and Kashmir’s political autonomy in August 2019, press freedom and rights groups have documented numerous incidents of detentions and threats to journalists in the region. In view of this, the release of Fahad Shah and other arbitrarily detained journalists is a critical step to prevent further criminalization of the profession in Jammu and Kashmir.

We urge you to ensure that authorities drop their retaliatory investigations into all four journalists, withdraw any unwarranted charges brought against them, and allow Kashmiri members of the press to work freely without facing detention, harassment, and other forms of government reprisal.

Signed:

Alliance for a Secular and Democratic South Asia

Ambedkar King Study Circle

Ambedkar International Center

Aotearoa Alliance of Progressive Indians

Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha

Boston South Asian Coalition (BSAC)

Committee Against Assault on Journalists (CAAJ)

Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ)

Council on Minority Rights in India (CMRI)

C19 People’s Coalition

Dart Center for Journalism and Trauma

Digipub News India Foundation

Forum Against Oppression of Women, Mumbai

Foundation The London Story

Free Press Unlimited

Free Speech Collective

Friends of India, Texas

German Indian Alliance for Peace

Global South Against Xenophobia

Himal Southasian

Hindus for Human Rights

Human Rights Law Network

Human Rights Watch

The Humanism Project

India Solidarity Germany

Indian American Muslim Council

Indian Federation of Working Journalists (IFWJ)

Indian Journalists Union (IJU)

Insider, Inc.

International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)

International Federation of Journalists (IFJ)

International Press Institute

International Solidarity for Academic Freedom in India (InSAF India)

Jammu and Kashmir Journalists Association (JAKJA)

Jacobin

Journalist Federation of Kashmir (JFK)

Justice for All, Canada

Justice for All, USA

Kashmir Working Journalists Association

The Nation

Network of Women in Media, India (NWMI)

Overseas Press Club of America

PEN America

People Against Apartheid and Fascism (PAAF)

Press Club of India

Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI)

Pulitzer Center

Reporters Without Borders (RSF)

Rural Indigenous Health, Boston

Scottish Indians for Justice

Semillas Collective

Sikh Human Rights Group

South Asian Americans Leading Together (SAALT)

South Asian Journalists Association (SAJA)

South Asia Media Defenders Network (SAMDEN)

South Asia Peace Action Network (SAPAN)

South Asia Solidarity Group

Turbine Bagh


SEE LA REVUE GAUCHE - Left Comment: Search results for HINDUISM IS FASCISM 

ICYMI

Pressure Mounts for Release of Political Prisoner Leonard Peltier

Pressure for President Joe Biden to grant clemency to Leonard Peltier (Turtle Mountain Chippewa Nation) is increasing after it was announced two weeks ago the 77-year-old prisoner contracted COVID-19. Peltier, who tested positive for COVID-19 on January 28, 2022, is incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary at Coleman, Fla. (USP Coleman 1).

Leonard Peltier (Photo/Courtesy)

Peltier was convicted of killing two FBI agents in a shootout at Oglala on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in June 1975. Since many legal experts have maintained the federal case against Peltier was flawed. Native Americans across Indian Country consider him a political prisoner.

Since Peltier was diagnosed with COVID-19, the International Indian Treaty Council, based in Tucson, Ariz. has called on President Biden to release him from prison. In a letter dated Feb. 2, 2022, the IITC tells the president Peltier’s health condition necessitates his release:

“Mr. Peltier has several compounding health conditions, including kidney disease, diabetes, and high blood pressure. COVID-19 is a deadly virus in and of itself and the likelihood of long-COVID disabilities or death increase drastically with pre-existing conditions. A person that contracts COVID-19 with pre-existing kidney disease is twice as likely to succumb to the virus. A person that is over the age of 65 (Mr. Peltier is 77) is 80 times more likely to succumb to the virus.”

The IITC concludes the letter to with a compliment to the Biden administration for its work in Indian Country but emphasizes the need for action on the Peltier case.

“We have seen and felt the commitment the Biden Administration has shown to Indian Country and Indigenous communities. We need to see that same commitment to repair the relationship between the U.S. and Indigenous Peoples of this land in Mr. Peltier’s case,” the letter said.

On Feb. 4, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), the longest serving U.S. senator and the president pro tempore of the United States Senate, called on President Biden to release Peltier.

In a statement, Leahy writes:

“I urge President Biden to commute Leonard Peltier’s prison sentence and release him from federal prison. Peltier, a prominent Native American activist, was imprisoned for crimes he and many other legal experts and advocates maintain he never committed. His trial was so riddled with flaws that even one of the prosecutors trying him has acknowledged that Peltier was wrongfully convicted. Peltier, now 77 years old and ailing with multiple health problems, has served more than 44 years in federal prison.”

Leahy concludes his statement by saying: “I call on President Biden to commute Mr. Peltier’s sentence expeditiously. It is the right thing to do.” 

Biden and Leahy spent 36 years serving in the U.S. Senate before Biden became vice president under President Barack Obama.

On Friday, Feb. 10, nine members of Congress, led by Rep. Raúl M. Grijalva (D-AZ),  sent a letter to President Biden, United States Attorney General Merrick Garland, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons Michael Carvajal, and Southeast Regional Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons William Lothrop, Jr. requesting the expedited release of and clemency for Leonard Peltier. 

In the letter, the members of Congress write:

“In the federal government’s national response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Department of Justice (DOJ) authorized the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to release elderly inmates and those with underlying health conditions from federal prisons. Since Mr. Peltier is 77 years old and suffers from diabetes and an abdominal aortic aneurysm, we urged you to release him from federal custody and grant him clemency immediately. Unfortunately, Mr. Peltier has contracted COVID-19 and is now at risk for additional medical complications.

Given Mr. Peltier’s new COVID-19 diagnosis and to avoid further risks to his health and safety, we urge you to approve his pending petition for clemency on humanitarian grounds.”



Taliban have detained 29 women and their families in Kabul, says US envoy

Report by senior diplomat Rina Amiri raises concerns about number of ‘unjust detentions’ in Afghanistan
Taliban fighters walk at the frozen Qargha Lake, near Kabul, 
Afghanistan. Photograph: Hussein Malla/AP


Emma Graham-Harrison
Sat 12 Feb 2022 

The Taliban have detained 29 women and their families in Kabul, a senior US diplomat said on Saturday, adding to concerns about rising numbers of people seized and held indefinitely in Afghanistan.

Rina Amiri, US special envoy for Afghan Women, Girls and Human Rights, said that women were among 40 people seized on Friday. “These unjust detentions must stop,” she said in a tweet.

It has since been deleted, but other sources confirmed that multiple women had been detained in Kabul. The state department did not respond to requests for comment on why it was removed.

Earlier on Friday, the Taliban released a group of journalists including two foreigners, after news of their detention caused an international outcry. They also freed an activist who had disappeared after a women’s rights protest, amid mounting diplomatic pressure including from the UN secretary general.

“I am increasingly concerned about the wellbeing of missing women activists in Afghanistan. Several have ‘disappeared’, some not heard from in weeks,” António Guterres had said on Twitter on Thursday. “I strongly urge the Taliban to ensure their safety so that they can return home.”

But other female activists, some of who were abducted from their homes in the middle of the night, have not been set free. The Taliban police and the interior ministry denied any role in their arrests.

Rights groups denounced the disappearances as a campaign of intimidation, after the Taliban brought in oppressive rules including barring girls from secondary education, and women from most work outside the health and education sectors.

“Every disappearance highlights one of the huge gaps in Afghanistan today, the lack of rule of law,” said Heather Barr, associate women’s rights director at Human Rights Watch.

“This is not how you act when you are trying to be a government, and it highlights the callousness with which they seem to think they can just abduct women and sloppily deny it.”

There are also concerns about Alia Azizi, a senior prison official who has been missing for more than four months after reporting for work. Several women who worked for the security forces under the previous government have been attacked and killed since the Taliban came to power.

“While we welcome the release of Parwana, these families and others, including Alia, are still detained,” Amiri said in her tweet.

None of those held have been charged with any crime, or able to contact lawyers or speak to their families.

The British government has also raised concerns about citizens who have been held for several months. The family of cameraman-turned-businessman Peter Jouvenal have gone public with their concerns about his health since he was seized in December.

He is married to an Afghan citizen and was in Kabul for work and to settle family affairs. Friends are concerned about his health and safety; he requires medication for high blood pressure and Covid is rampant in the Afghan prison system.