Sunday, January 01, 2023

FROM PEASANT TO PROLETARIAT
Climate change forces Thai farmers off rice fields

Unpredictable weather forces rice farmers to abandon their land and head to cities to look for construction work.
24 October 2022 

Pimonrat Bootjan, 59, a former farmer from the northeastern province of Surin, migrated to Bangkok more than a decade ago as her meager income from farming could not feed her and her family anymore. PHOTO: Tanat Chayaphattharitthee


BANGKOK/SURIN, THAILAND – Migration from rural to urban areas is part of climate adaptation for many Thai farmers facing unpredictable weather. But their new lives in the cities can leave them poor, uncertain and lonely.

On the roadside near Soi Kip Moo, one of the largest internal migrant communities in the eastern part of Bangkok, many workers line up every morning and wait to be picked up.

Pimonrat Bootjan, 59, a former farmer from the northeast province of Surin’s Sangkha district is one of them.

Her destination is a construction site where she works relentlessly throughout the day to build the concrete forest for Thailand’s capital ― in exchange for a daily income that will help her gradually repay her debt and feed her family of three.

At night, she returns to a tiny, rented room she shares with her 20-year-old son, who suffers from alcoholism and the congenital disease epilepsy, which takes away his ability to work.

She divorced her husband, who was also addicted to alcohol, many years ago and became the breadwinner of the family. Another elder son is a blue-collar worker who visits her occasionally.

Looking back to the day she quit farming, she believes her decision was right, although she must endure extremely hard work, poor living conditions and loneliness in the big city.

“The last time I grew rice, I ended up being more than 10,000 baht ($US300) in debt after I borrowed money to pay for fertilizers, pesticides and rented harvesting machines. That was when I decided to call it quits,” she recalled.

“Had the income from rice-growing been more stable and profitable, I would have continued to be a peasant and not become a construction worker.”

Her story is typical in her agrarian village in north-eastern Surin province. Almost every household has at least one member moving out because in-season rice cultivation is not sufficient to feed the family.

The causes of their migration are complex and varied.

The country’s economic drive is often seen as the major factor as migration has become a part of Thai farmers’ lives since the economic reform of the 1960s ― shifting the Thai economy from agricultural reliance to industrial and service sectors, which attracts farmers from rural areas to cities.

But recently, agricultural experts, academics and farmers have pointed out that environmental degradation and unpredictable weather linked to climate change may also contribute to farmers’ decisions to migrate.

“Extreme weather events and changing weather patterns have crippled rice cultivation,” said Ubon Yoowa, chairman of the Surin-based Community of Argo-ecology Foundation, which has monitored Thai farmers’ movements for three decades.

“Suffering from the losses of rice yields and incomes, farmers are forced to migrate to work elsewhere. If farmers had a certain level of financial stability from rice-growing, they would not have to search for other sources of income.”

Pimonrat Bootjan, 59, a former farmer from Thailand’s northeastern region, returns to her rented room after buying food in the fresh market in Bangkok. Rice growing won’t be her choice anymore as she does not own any land and the crop yields are unstable. PHOTO: Tanat Chayaphattharitthee

According to a 2020 study by the Bank of Thailand’s Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research, about 9.58 million people from farming households are working outside the farm sector, most of them – or almost seven million – are from the northeast.

The study also found that 76% of farming households are forced to rely on income from non-farming sectors.

From peasant to mason

As many as 216 million people in six regions could be internal climate migrants by 2050, according to the World Bank’s Groundswell Part 2 report. The poorest and most vulnerable will be hit the hardest.

The projected number of climate migrants is 6.3 million in the Lower Mekong subregion ― comprising Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam ― if no measures are taken to address climate change. This represents 2.7% of the total population of the subregion.

The migration will be influenced by sea-level rises, declines in water availability and crop productivity, the report pointed out.

Pimonrat and her family members have already been climate migrants as migration was part of their adaptation to survive uncertainty ― not only from the unpredictable weather, but also from the volatile agricultural market.

At the age of four, her family of nine migrated from their parched village in Thailand’s northern Roi Et province to Surin province to evade water shortage.

Her father then headed to Phuket and became a construction worker as farming alone could not sustain the family. Her mother and siblings stayed home and continued rice farming.

Outside the crop season, her siblings went to work at construction sites in Bangkok. They later quit growing rice and turned from seasonal to regular construction workers because of more stable incomes.

Soon Pimonrat followed their path, mainly because of the financial pressure from debt and lower crop productivity. She decided to stop farming, sold her farmland and became a construction worker in Bangkok in 2006.



A closeup of a climate migrant’s life

A Thai photographer documents the life of a farmer-turned-construction worker in a city as unpredictable weather devastates her crops and income.

Her village has 184 households with a population of 685. Only about half of them, mostly the elderly and children, remain in the village.

She has almost cut her ties with peasant life, except for her 96-year-old mother, who she visits twice a year.

Now settled in Bangkok, she earns a regular income that can pay her debts and sustain her life, despite having little savings. She earns 800 baht per day ($25), although there is no work on some days.

Her overall income was much better than being a peasant, when only had money once a year after the harvest.

A means of adaptation

Migration has long been part of Thai farmers’ way of life under the uncertainty triggered by climate change, said Thanyaporn Chankrajang, the economist from Chulalongkorn University.

“Migration is a means of income diversification for agricultural households,” she said.

In August 2022, Thanyaporn Chankrajang and economics academic Khemarat Talerngsri-Teerasuwannajak published research that indicated the links between falling rice production and unpredictable weather caused by climate change.

Using 65-year-old weather data from 1951 to 2016, the researchers found evidence of significant regional climate change in Thailand in terms of increasing temperature and declining precipitation.

The average temperature normal in Thailand increased between 0.09 and 0.18 Celsius per decade ― decreasing the rice yields in Thailand’s northeast region, in particular.

The average rainfall has dropped considerably in all regions, except the northeast, which experienced too much precipitation during the harvest season, leading to a decline in the area of rice cultivation.

“Despite clear trends in climate change, we find that its adverse effects are mild and sporadic. In addition, sustained long-term upward trends in historical rice yields are strongly evident,” the research concluded.

“Our results imply two factors that support long-run upward productivity trends. First is the expansion of irrigated areas. Second is a technological improvement, including the adoption of high yield varieties and farmers’ direct climate adaptation such as changing the rice crop sowing date, intercropping and off-farm diversification.”

Due to unpredictable weather, some farmers in Surin province have shifted to fishing. They have experienced heavy rain during the harvest season, damaging their crops and wiping out their incomes. PHOTO: Tanat Chayaphattharitthee

A 2020 article, titled “Building Climate Resilience through Migration in Thailand” by Patrick Sakdapolrak and Harald Sterly, gave a similar view on farmers’ migration as a means of adaptation.

“Climate change is increasingly threatening human security, especially among vulnerable populations in the global South […] Migration in this context should not be seen only as the result of a household’s failure to adapt, but can also be part and parcel of the process of successful adaptation,” the article said.
Hoping for some luck

“We normally sow rice at the beginning of the rainy season. If the rainy season is delayed, rice seeds will not germinate,” said Prasit Taweewannakit, the deputy village head of Surin’s Non Samran village, who is also a rice farmer.

“Meanwhile, if there is too much rain during the dry season when we harvest and dry the rice, the grain will be damaged or dampened and has to be sold at low prices.”

His village is located in a non-irrigated area, so farmers had to grow in-season rice, mostly Hom Mali 105 varieties. This means they can grow rice only once a year, unlike farmers in irrigated areas who can grow multiple off-season rice crops.

As a result, farmers have to rely on seasonal weather patterns and are vulnerable to unpredictable weather. Natural disasters, including floods, droughts, rice disease and pests increase the risk of crop and income losses.

“For small-scale farmers like us, rice-growing creates more losses than profits. Rice is no longer a staple source of income, but we continue to do it because it is better than leaving the land unused and at least we have rice for household consumption,” Prasit said.

Many of his villagers can’t clearly link low crop productivity to climate change, as they focus more on urgent matters, especially debt and feeding their families.

But for Chaiwat Wilaisungnoen, an agricultural extensionist at Sangkha District Agricultural Extension Office under the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, the impacts of climate change on rice cultivation in the district are obvious.

In late 2021, the district experienced “unusual” rainfall periods with a lot of rain in the harvesting season, starting from November to February.

Rice farmers were hit by the unusual rainfalls again in the summer month of April this year, causing month-long floods in lowland paddy fields that forced farmers to delay sowing until July onwards. Some had to sow two or three times because the seeds were damaged in floods.

There were also links between the odd weather patterns and the outbreak of rice blast disease, a fungal disease that poses a serious impact to rice productivity.

“Unusually high and prolonged humid weather coupled with strong winds were believed to play a role in the severity of the rice blast disease outbreak in Surin in 2019,” observed Chaiwat.

“The disease damaged more than 30,000 rai (4,800 hectares) of rice paddy in Sangkha district alone, affecting around 5,000 rice farmers.”

The government paid 34.5-million baht in aid to affected farmers in the district that year.

“With the unpredictable weather and seasonal anomalies, I would say that apart from skills and capital, peasants need a lot of luck too,” he said, adding that more villagers, especially the younger generation, would turn their backs on rice cultivation because of the uncertainty of harvesting a healthy crop.

The rising cost of agricultural production and chronic debt are the common reasons for farmers to leave the land. But these factors may also be linked to climate change as farmers have experienced irregular floods and drought that cause declining crop productivity. 
PHOTO Paritta Wangkiat

No turning back


To help farmers with climate change, Ubon, from the Surin-based Community of Agro-ecology Foundation, suggested the nation’s weather forecast system be improved to specifically serve the agricultural sector.

“We need area- and time-specific weather forecasts that can really help farmers to make the right decision on when and what to plant,” he said.

Developing climate change-resilient rice varieties should be another priority for concerned agencies.

The economist Thanyaporn said the government or local administrative bodies should focus on creating small-scale water retention at a community- or household-level, according to her study.

They were effective tools in helping farmers cope with water shortages in the dry season and flooding in the wet season, as well as the climate crisis that occurred in the El Nino/La Nina years.

As for those who left agriculture for a long time, returning to it is not easy.

Pimonrat was counting down her days as a construction worker in the capital. It is hard for an elder worker like her to get long-term employment as the foremen prefer younger and stronger laborers.

“I might have to return to Surin in the next few years,” she said, adding that she had mixed feelings about migrating back to her hometown.

“It’s good to stay close to my elderly mother and relatives, but I still don’t know what to do there for a living.”

Rice-growing was no longer a choice because she no longer owns land and is too old to work in the fields.

“Perhaps, I will do small merchantry in the village,” she said.

The production of this story was supported by Internews’ Earth Journalism Network.

Tanat Chayaphattharitthee is a photojournalist based in Bangkok, Thailand. His works appear in multiple media outlets, including National Geographic Thailand. He has joined Thai News Pix, an independent press photo agency, since early 2022. His photograph series “A closeup of a climate migrant’s life” documented the life of a farmer turning to construction jobs in a city as unpredictable weather devastates her crops and incomes.Tagged:climate changeclimate migrantdroughtflood
migration


ABOUT THE WRITER

Kultida Samabuddhi has been working as a journalist for more than 20 years. She is a former deputy news editor at the Bangkok Post and online news editor at Thai Public Broadcasting Service. Her latest position was Bangkok Desk Editor at BBC Thai language service. She is now a freelance journalist. More by Kultida Samabuddhi
Russia And Turkey Collaborate In Syria To Uncle Sam’s Chagrin – OpEd

 Russia's Vladimir Putin and Turkey's Recep Tayyip Erdogan giving statements to the press after Russian-Turkish talks.
Photo Credit: Kremlin.ru

January 1, 2023 Eurasia Review 
By M.K. Bhadrakumar

The curtain is coming down on the brutal 11-year old Syrian conflict, which former US President and Nobel Laureate Barack Obama initiated, as the Arab Spring swept through West Asia two decades ago. The United States has suffered yet another big setback in West Asia as the year 2022 draws to a close. The unfolding Turkish-Syrian reconciliation process under Russian mediation is to be seen as a saga of betrayal and vengeance.

Ankara came under immense pressure from the Obama Administration in 2011 to spearhead the regime change project in Syria. Obama blithely assumed that Turkiye would gleefully serve as the charioteer of “moderate” Islamism for the transformation in West Asia. But Ankara took its time to calibrate its foreign policies to adapt to the Arab Spring before responding to the shifting landscape in Syria.

Erdogan was caught unprepared by the uprising in Syria at a juncture when Ankara was pursuing a “zero-problems” policy with Turkiye’s neighbors. Ankara was unsure how the Arab Spring would play out and remained silent when the revolt first appeared in Tunisia. Even on Egypt, Erdogan made an emotional call for Hosni Mubarak’s departure only when he sensed, correctly so, that Obama was decoupling from America’s staunch ally in Cairo.

Syria was the ultimate test case and a real challenge for Erdogan. Ankara had invested heavily in the improvement of relations with Syria within the framework of the so-called Adana Agreement in 1998 in the downstream of Turkish military’s massive showdown with Damascus over the latter harboring the PKK [Kurdish] leader Ocalan. Erdogan initially did not want Bashar al-Assad to lose power, and advised him to reform. The families of Erdogan and Assad used to holiday together.

Obama had to depute then CIA chief David Petraeus to visit Turkey twice in 2012 to persuade Erdogan to engage with the US in operational planning aimed at bringing about the end of the Assad government. It was Petraeus who proposed to Ankara a covert program of arming and training Syrian rebels.

But by 2013 already, Erdogan began sensing that Obama himself had only a limited American involvement in Syria and preferred to lead from the rear. In 2014, Erdogan went public that his relations with Obama had diminished, saying that he was disappointed about not getting direct results on the Syrian conflict. By that time, more than 170,000 people had died and 2.9 million Syrians had fled to neighboring countries, including Turkey, and the fighting had forced another 6.5 million people from their homes within Syria.

Simply put, Erdogan felt embittered that he was left holding a can of worms and Obama had scooted off. Worse still, the Pentagon began aligning with the Syrian Kurdish groups linked to the PKK. (In October 2014, US began providing supplies to Kurdish forces and in November 2015, US special forces were deployed in Syria.)

Indeed, since then, Erdogan had been protesting in vain that the US, a NATO ally, had aligned with a terrorist group (Syrian Kurds known as YPG) that threatened Turkiye’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.

It is against such a backdrop that the two meetings in Moscow on Wednesday between the defense ministers and intelligence chiefs of Turkey and Syria in the presence of their Russian counterparts took place. Erdogan’s reconciliation process with Assad is quintessentially his sweet revenge for the American betrayal. Erdogan sought help from Russia, the archetypal enemy country in the US and NATO’s sights, in order to communicate with Assad who is a pariah in American eyes. The matrix is self-evident.

On Thursday, Turkish Defence Minister Hulusi Akar said: “At the meeting (in Moscow), we discussed what we could do to improve the situation in Syria and the region as soon as possible while ensuring peace, tranquility and stability… We reiterated our respect for the territorial integrity and sovereignty rights of all our neighbours, especially Syria and Iraq, and that our sole aim is the fight against terrorism, we have no other purpose.”

Russian President Vladimir Putin has been counseling Erdogan in recent years that Turkiye’s security concerns are best tackled in coordination with Damascus and that the Adana Agreement could provide a framework of cooperation. The Turkish Defence Ministry readout said the meeting in Moscow took place in a “constructive atmosphere” and it was agreed to continue the format of trilateral meetings “to ensure and maintain stability in Syria and the region as a whole.”

Without doubt, the normalization between Ankara and Damascus will impact regional security and, in particular, the Syrian war, given the clout Turkiye wields with the residual Syrian opposition. A Turkish ground operation in northern Syria may not be necessary if Ankara and Damascus were to revive the Adana Agreement. In fact, Akar disclosed that Ankara, Moscow and Damascus are working on carrying out joint missions on the ground in Syria.

The Russian Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu’s willingness right in the middle of the Ukraine war to take the steering wheel and navigate its reconciliation with Syria adds an altogether new dimension to the deepening strategic ties between Moscow and Ankara. For Erdogan too, Syria becomes the newest addition to his policy initiatives lately to improve Turkiye’s relations with the regional states. Normalization with Syria will go down well with Turkish public opinion and that has implications for Erdogan’s bid for a renewed mandate in the upcoming elections.

From the Syrian perspective, the normalization with Turkiye is going to be far more consequential than the restoration of ties with various regional states (starting with the UAE) in the recent years who had fuelled the conflict. Turkiye’s equations with Syrian militant groups (eg., Syrian National Army and Hayat Tahrir al-Sham), its continued occupation of Syrian territory, Syrian refugees in Turkey (numbering 3.6 million), etc. are vital issues affecting Syria’s security.

The US resents Erdogan’s move to normalize with Assad — and that too, with Russia’s helping hand. It is now even more unlikely to give up its military presence in Syria or its alliance with the Syrian Kurdish group YPG (which Ankara regards as an affiliate of the PKK.)

But the YPG will find itself in a tight spot. As Syria requests Turkiye to withdraw from its territories (Idlib and so-called operation areas) and stop supporting armed groups, Turkiye in return will insist on pushing the YPG away from the border. (The government-aligned Syrian daily Al-Watan reported quoting sources that at the tripartite meeting in Moscow, Ankara has committed to withdrawing all its forces from Syrian territory.)


Indeed, the replacement of the YPG militia by the Syrian government forces along the borders with Turkiye would lead to the weakening of both YPG and the US military presence. However, the question will still remain unanswered as regards the place of Kurds in the future of Syria.

The US State Department stated recently, “The US will not upgrade its diplomatic relations with the Assad regime and does not support other countries upgrading their relations. The US urges states in the region to consider carefully the atrocities inflicted by the Assad regime on the Syrian people over the last decade. The US believes that stability in Syria and the greater region can be achieved through a political process that represents the will of all Syrians.”

Last week’s meetings in Moscow show that Russia’s standing in the West Asian region is far from defined by the Ukraine conflict. Russian influence on Syria remains intact and Moscow will continue to shape Syria’s transition out of the conflict zone and consolidate its own long-term presence in the Eastern Mediterranean.

OPEC Plus has gained traction. Russia’s ties with the Gulf states are steadily growing. The Russia-Iran strategic ties are at its highest level in history. And the return of Benjamin Netanyahu as prime minister means that the Russian-Israeli ties are heading for a reset. Clearly, Russian diplomacy is on a roll in West Asia.

Conventional wisdom was that Russia and Turkiye’s geopolitical interests would inevitably collide once the floodgates were opened in Ukraine. Herein lies the paradox, for, what has happened is entirely to the contrary.

M.K. Bhadrakumar is a former Indian diplomat. This article was produced in partnership by Indian Punchline and Globetrotter.

Nuclear deal with Iran is not dead: US envoy

TEHRAN, Dec. 24 (MNA) – The US Special Envoy for Iran Robert Malley says that the nuclear deal with Iran is not dead.

In an interview with RFE/RL's Radio Farda on Friday, the Biden administration's special envoy for Iran claimed that negotiations on reviving the deal reached a point in September where "we even thought for a day or two that Iran was on board" until Tehran tacked on new demands at the last minute that scuppered the chances of moving forward.

Robert Malley's claim came as a few days ago American media broadcast a video of US President Joe Biden on the sidelines of a Nov. 4 election rally that he said the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran is “dead,” but stressed the U.S. won’t formally announce it.

The remarks come as negotiations, which started in April last year in Vienna, remain stalled since August as Washington refuses to remove sanctions that were slapped on the Islamic Republic by the previous US administration of Donald Trump.

Despite notable progress, the US indecisiveness and procrastination caused multiple interruptions in the marathon talks.

Iranian officials have, time and again, asserted that upon potentially lifting the sanctions, Washington should be able to guarantee that it would not return the bans again.

Brexit regret: Why the ‘undeniable disaster’ finally hit home with the British public in 2022

Story by Adam Forrest • Yesterday
The Independent
155,477,887 Comments

The Tories, Labour and Liberal Democrats did their best to ignore Brexit in 2022, despite a growing mountain of evidence on the economic damage caused by the UK’s decision to leave the EU.

BBC Question Time audience member eviscerates Brexit to Jacob Rees-Mogg
View on Watch

But 2022 was the year of Brexit regret, as opinion surveys saw an increasing number of people saying our exit has gone badly and record high support for re-joining the bloc.

So what changed? The Independent took a closer look at the deluge of data on Brexit’s painful impact on the economy and growing unpopularity in the polls.


Six years on from the public vote, do supporters feel buyer’s remorse? 

In December, the Centre for European Reform (CER) found that Brexit cost the UK a staggering £33bn in lost trade, investment and growth. The CER also estimated the tax loss from Brexit at around £40bn.

The research – first shared with The Independent – showed that by June of this year Britain’s economy was 5.5 per cent smaller than it would have been if the country had remained in the EU.

Then there was the impact on food prices. Brexit has cost households more than £5.8bn in higher supermarket bills, a study by the Centre for Economic Performance found earlier in December.

The experts, based at the London School of Economics (LSE), said Brexit had pushed up UK food prices by 6 per cent, since new trade barriers were a key factor behind the nation’s highest inflation rates in decades.

Brexit has also been hitting wages. Back in June, a damning report from the Resolution Foundation and LSE experts found that Brexit would dampen British workers’ pay for the rest of the decade – making the whole of the country “poorer” during the 2020s.

It found that real pay was set to be £470 lower per worker each year, on average, than if Britain had opted to stay inside the EU. Experts pointed to 8 per cent slump in the UK’s “trade openness” – trade as a share of economic output – since Brexit.


Anti-Brexit protesters outside Parliament (PA)©

Surveys repeatedly showed businesses continuing to struggle with Brexit bureaucracy. By the end of 2022, some 56 per cent of trading firms still faced difficulties importing or exporting goods, the British Chambers of Commerce found.

Few senior figures outside of government had little good to say about Brexit. In November, the Office for Budget Responsibility said it was sticking to its previous estimate that Brexit would reduce GDP by 4 per cent over 15 years from 2016 – swiping an estimated £100bn from the economy long-term.

The same month, the respected Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said it had become clear that Brexit had been a major “own goal” for the economy. Director Paul Johnson said: “Economically speaking, that has been very bad news indeed and continues to be bad news.”

The Bank of England’s chief economist Huw Pill said Brexit was partly to blame for the UK’s high levels of inflation, and questioned whether the post-Brexit shift to non-EU migrants had been as “productive” to the UK economy.

And ex-environment secretary George Eustice, after leaving government, admitted that the post-Brexit trade agreement with Australia was “not actually a very good deal”.

In November, the Tony Blair Institute said it was time for Rishi Sunak to consider aligning with parts of the EU single market for goods and “revisit” the Brexit trade deal already agreed with Brussels.

It followed a furore over a report that the government was considering “Swiss-style” alignment deal to gain single market access. Mr Sunak swiftly ruled out the possibility, but a series of polls found a majority of voters want closer ties with the EU.



Boris Johnson pushed Brexit through but is already yesterday’s man 
after a chaotic 2022 (PA)

So has public opinion hardened against Brexit? Polling guru Prof John Curtice said there has clearly been “greater pessimism” about the impact of Brexit and “a detectable majority in favour of joining the EU” during the past year.

In October, a Redfield and Wilton Strategies poll found record support for reversing Brexit at 57 per cent, compared to just 43 per cent who want to stay out of the EU. In November, one in five Leave voters told YouGov they regretted voting for Brexit – the highest number yet recorded by the firm.

And in December some 65 per cent of all voters told Opinium that Brexit is going badly, while only 21 per cent believe it is going well – the highest level of negativity since Boris Johnson’s trade deal came into force.

“There is no doubt that there has been something of a decline in support for Brexit,” Prof Curtice told The Independent. “The principal explanation for the shift seems to be the economic consequences of Brexit.”

Naomi Smith, chief executive of Best for Britain – which campaigns for closer ties with the EU – said 2022 was the year that “the damaging fallout of Brexit became undeniable with most people now agreeing that the government’s deal has been an unmitigated disaster”.

The campaigner added: “It is far past time that those responsible for this sabotage are held to account and for those hoping to form the next government to level with the public about Brexit.”

With the Labour and Lib Dems stung by past electoral failures from Brexit, and most Tories stunned into silence by the present disarray, it seems unlikely we will see a major shift in positions in the early part of next year.

But Mr Sunak, Sir Keir Starmer and Sir Ed Davey may find it increasingly hard to ignore the consequences of Brexit during 2023, and the growing clamour for clarity on what fixing the mess might look like.

From news to politics, travel to sport, culture to climate – The Independent has a host of free newsletters to suit your interests. To find the stories you want to read, and more, in your inbox, click here.
U$A
New laws on minimum wage, cannabis use, criminal justice reform take effect in 2023

By Matt Bernardini

Service Employee International Union Fight for $15 a Hour holds a rally outside the US Capitol in Washington, DC on Wednesday, May 19, 2021. Twenty-seven states are set to increase their minimum wages in 2023.
File Photo by Tasos Katopodis/UPI | License Photo

Dec. 28 (UPI) -- With the new year comes new laws as residents in many states will see some impactful changes beginning as soon as Jan. 1, 2023.

The new laws, passed by state legislatures and ballot measures approved by voters, deal with minimum wage increases, marijuana legalization and criminal justice reform.

Here are some of the notable laws set to take effect.

Minimum Wage

In the new year, 27 states will see an increase in their minimum wage. Most will take effect on Jan. 1, but others will have to wait until further into 2023.

California will lead the way with the highest minimum wage rate of any state at $15.50. Washington D.C.'s is $16.10.

Connecticut and Massachusetts will bring their minimum wages to $15 an hour, completing a series of incremental increases. Six other states will move closer to $15 an hour in 2023. New Jersey aims to reach the mark by 2024, while Delaware, Illinois, Maryland and Rhode Island will hit it by 2025.

While some states will have minimum wage increases, workers won't see the benefits until later in the year. In July, Nevada's minimum wage will increase to $10.25 for employers providing qualifying health benefits and $11.25 for those that don't.

Also in July, Oregon's minimum wage will increase from $13.50 to a new figure that will be determined by the Consumer Price Index.

Despite the increases, twenty states continue to have a minimum wage of $7.25 an hour, the same as the federal minimum wage, which hasn't been raised since 2009.

RELATED California governor signs fast-food bill with potential $22 an hour minimum wage


Marijuana Legalization


While the House of Representatives passed a bill in April to legalize recreational marijuana, it is not currently on track to be signed into law federally. However, a number of states have made progress on the issue of legalization.

In November, voters in Maryland and Missouri approved ballot measures that will allow adults to use medical marijuana. This brings the total number of states that have legalized recreational or medical marijuana use to 21, plus the District of Columbia.

In March a special election will take place in Oklahoma to decide whether or not adult-use cannabis should be legal.

Criminal Justice Reform

In 2023, several states will have reformed criminal justice laws, in an effort to make the system more equitable.

California will allow people with violent felony records to petition to have their records sealed if they completed their sentence and have not had a new felony offense in four years. The state also decided to restrict the use of rap lyrics in criminal investigations.

Michigan will also make it easier for past felons to shed their criminal record. Starting in April, up to two felony convictions will automatically be expunged 10 years after sentencing or the person's release from custody. As many as four misdemeanors will automatically be expunged 7 years after sentencing.

Illinois was set to become the first state in the country to end cash bail, however, some counties will not see the effects on Jan. 1, as a Kankakee County judge ruled Wednesday that portions of the "SAFE-T Act" are unconstitutional.

Under the law, courts in 38 counties will begin using "a more equitable system where pre-trial detention is based on community risk rather than financial means," on Jan. 1, according to Gov. J.B. Pritzker's office.

However, following the court's ruling cash bail can remain in place in 64 counties.

The Illinois Attorney General's office is expected to appeal the ruling to the state Supreme Court.

"We cannot and should not defend a system that fails to keep people safe by allowing those who are a threat to their community the ability to simply buy their way out of jail," Pritzker said. "I thank the attorney general for his work on this case and look forward to the Illinois Supreme Court taking up the appeal as soon as possible."


Korean conglomerates continue to break glass ceiling

By Kim Yoon-kyoung & Kim Tae-gyu, UPI News Korea

Samsung Electronics’ Lee Young-hee (L) became the first woman to hold the job of president at Samsung Group units who is not related to the owner family. KB Securities CEO Park Jeong-rim (R) is the first female CEO at the country’s brokerage industry.
 Photo courtesy of Samsung Electronics, KB Securities

SEOUL, Dec. 30 (UPI) -- South Korea is notorious for its glass ceiling, ranked worst among the OECD countries, but the country's top conglomerates are on a path to changing things.

Late last month, cosmetics leader LG Household & Health Care tapped Lee Jung-ae as its CEO, the first woman to lead an affiliate of the LG Group, South Korea's No. 4 conglomerate.

SK Group, Korea's second-largest conglomerate, followed suit this month by appointing Ahn Jung-eun as its CEO of online retailer 11th Street, also becoming the first female chief of any kind in the history of the group.

Samsung Group, worldwide leader in electronics and the largest business entity in Korea, named its first woman, Lee Young-hee, who had held the title of vice president of global marketing in the Device eXperience division of Samsung Electronics, to the position of president this month.

RELATED Samsung's new president is first woman not related to owners

Since its founding in 1938, with exceptions for owner family members, Samsung had never promoted any females to the title of president.

"According to the glass-ceiling index measured by a U.K. media outlet, South Korea ranked the lowest among OECD member nations duringt he past decade," Seoul-based consultancy Leaders Index head ParkJu-gun told UPI News Korea.

"However, there are signs that things are changing as demonstrated by the measures taken by the leading conglomerates recently. We still have a long way to go, though," he said.

Experts point out that the next step toward cracking the glass ceiling must involve the country's top financial institutions, namely the country's big four -- KB, Shinhan, Woori and Hana bank.

KB Securities CEO Park Jeong-rim is regarded as the most likely to first achieve this breakthrough. In 2019, she became the first woman CEO of a brokerage firm. She was also charged with senior roles at KB Bank, the sister company to KB Securities.

"The banking industry has been a male-dominated business in South Korea. In other words, the glass ceiling has been the highest there," KimSang-kyung, chairwoman of the Korea Network of Women in Finance, an association of high-ranking women in banking, said in a phone interview.

RELATED 15 cars from Korean makers win top U.S. safety awards

"A female CEO taking charge of one of the big banks here will do a whole lot for smashing the glass ceiling," she said.
CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M
Florida business owner sentenced for exploiting Mexican farmworkers


Farm workers pick strawberries in Marina, California on Tuesday, April 28, 2020. Bladimir Moreno was sentenced to 118 months in prison on racketeering and forced-labor conspiracy charges. 
File Photo by Terry Schmitt/UPI | License Photo

Dec. 30 (UPI) -- The owner of a Florida-based farmworker company has been sentenced to 118 months in prison on racketeering and forced-labor conspiracy charges.

U.S. District Court Judge Charlene Edward Honeywell of the Middle District of Florida sentenced Bladimir Moreno, 55, Thursday and ordered him to pay more than $175,000 in restitution to the victims, all of whom were Mexican H-2A agricultural workers between 2015 and 2017.

According to court documents, Moreno owned and operated Los Villatoros Harvesting, a farm-labor contracting company that employed Mexican workers on H-2A agricultural visas. Authorities say that once the farmworkers arrived in the United States, Moreno used false promises and coercion to compel the workers to labor under harsh conditions in Florida, Kentucky, Indiana, Georgia and North Carolina.

Authorities say Moreno and his co-conspirators coerced H-2A agricultural workers by imposing debts on them, confiscating their passports and keeping them in the United States after their visas had expired. He also forced workers into "crowded, unsanitary and degrading living conditions" and threatened workers with arrest and deportation if they didn't meet his demands.

RELATED Gov. Newsom signs bill expanding union rights for farmworkers

Federal investigators say Moreno also gave investigators fraudulent worker records during their probe of operations at Los Villatoros Harvesting.

"This defendant abused his power as a business owner to capitalize on the victims' vulnerabilities and immigration status, luring those seeking a better quality of life with false promises of lawful work paying a fair wage," said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division. "The defendant forced Mexican agricultural workers to labor under inhumane conditions, confiscated their passports, imposed exorbitant fees and debts, and threatened them with deportation or false arrest."

Justice Department officials charged Moreno in 2021, and he pleaded guilty earlier this year to conspiracy under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, as well as conspiracy to commit forced labor. Two of his co-defendants previously pleaded guilty to conspiracy under the RICO Act and previously were sentenced in October. Christina Gamez, a U.S. citizen who worked for Los Villatoros Harvesting as a bookkeeper and supervisor, was sentenced to 37 months in prison. Guadalupe Mendes Mendoza, 45, pleaded guilty to conspiring to obstruct a federal investigation and was sentenced to eight months of home detention and a $5,500 fine.

RELATED Supreme Court rules against unions organizing on California farms

The Palm Beach County, Fla., Human Trafficking Task Force and the county's Sheriff's Office investigated the case with help from multiple Department of Labor investigators and worker-rights organizations. The Florida-based Coalition of Immokalee Workers said it assisted federal investigators after two workers escaped from their employers' control by hiding in the trunk of a car and escaping to seek help.

"Forcing individuals to work against their will using abusive and coercive tactics is not only unconscionable but illegal," said U.S. Attorney Roger Handberg for the Middle District of Florida. "We will continue to work with our task force partners to combat human trafficking in all its forms, including prosecuting those who exploit vulnerable workers."

Anyone with information about human trafficking can report it to the National Human Trafficking Hotline at 1-888-373-7888.
PRE-TRUMP
EPA returns to 2015 waterway protections in U.S.



Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Michael Regan speaks to Community Empowerment Association in Pittsburgh on June 17. He announced new waterway protection rules on Friday. File Photo by David Maxwell/UPI | License Photo


Dec. 30 (UPI) -- The Biden administration said Friday it was changing the definition of "waters of the United States" back to what it was in 2015 after the waterway protections were narrowed under former President Donald Trump.

The Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corp of Engineers announced the return to the definition established by the Obama administration, which used a broad definition of waters that fall under the protection of the 50-year-old Clean Water Act.

"When Congress passed the Clean Water Act 50 years ago, it recognized that protecting our waters is essential to ensuring healthy communities and a thriving economy," EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan said in a statement.

"Following extensive stakeholder engagement, and building on what we've learned from previous rules, EPA is working to deliver a durable definition of WOTUS that safeguards our nation's waters, strengthens economic opportunity, and protects people's health while providing greater certainty for farmers, ranchers, and landowners."

RELATED Diners choose more sustainable menu items when climate impact is labeled

The EPA said the new change is grounded in the authority provided by Congress in the Clean Water Act, the best available science, and extensive implementation experience stewarding the country's waterways.

"This final rule recognizes the essential role of the nation's water resources in communities across the nation," Michael L. Connor, assistant secretary of the Army for civil works, said in a statement.

"The rule's clear and supportable definition of waters of the United States will allow for more efficient and effective implementation and provide the clarity long desired by farmers, industry, environmental organizations, and other stakeholders."

RELATED Nations need to do more to confront climate change, U.N. says

The new rule also establishes a handful of exceptions, which include wetlands that were converted to cropland before 1985, waste treatment centers, ditches, areas with human-made irrigation, artificial lakes and ponds, and artificial pools.


Last SpaceX launch of 2022 carries Israeli reconnaissance satellite into orbit


An Israeli EROS 3 satellite was carried into orbit aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket launched from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California on Thursday.
 Photo by SpaceX/Twitter

Dec. 30 (UPI) -- An Israeli reconnaissance satellite was carried into orbit during the final SpaceX launch of the year.

The EROS-3 Earth-imaging satellite was launched aboard a Falcon 9 rocket from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California at 11:38 p.m. Thursday. The first stage detached successfully and landed on a SpaceX pad eight minutes after launch.

The rocket was launched in retrograde, against the direction of the Earth's rotation, and carried the EROS-3 into low Earth orbit.

The EROS-3 satellite has a resolution of one foot for panchromatic imagery, and two feet for multispectral imagery, according to Everyday Astronaut.

ImageSat was founded in 1997 by Israeli Aircraft Industries, El-Op and Core Software Technology. The first EROS satellite, EROS A, was launched into orbit from Siberia by a Russian Start 1 rocket in Dec., 2000. The EROS B was launched from Siberia in April, 2006.

A Human Rights Watch report in 2009 accused Israeli forces of killing civilians in Gaza with drones manufactured by Israeli Aircraft Industries.
White House antitrust adviser Tim Wu to step down

By Matt Bernardini

Tim Wu, a White House antitrust adviser, announced that he will be stepping down
. Photo by Olivia Ezratty/Wikimedia Commons

Dec. 30 (UPI) -- Tim Wu, a tech expert and law professor who has been advising the White House on tech and competition policy, will step down from his role next week.

The White House announced that Wednesday will be his last day at the National Economic Council and he will return to his previous job, as a professor at Columbia Law School.

"We had the rare opportunity in this Administration to try and steer the giant battleship of antitrust policy in a new direction," Wu said in a statement provided by the White House.

"We got more done over the last two years than I would have ever imagined, and it has been the opportunity of a lifetime to work on that project with an extraordinarily talented group of colleagues in the White House and the federal agencies."

RELATED Microsoft files response to antitrust action

Wu, 50, said personal reasons were driving his departure. He has been commuting to Washington from New York, requiring him to spend long periods away from his young children, according to The New York Times.

Wu was the author of Biden's July 2021 executive order that required federal agencies takes steps to increase competition across the economy.

He also helped lead the White House push on a largely failed attempt to pass new antitrust legislation targeting the tech sector.

RELATED Amazon reaches deal with European Union to end antitrust investigation

Wu told the Times that it was "disappointing" that tech-related legislation had not passed during his tenure and defended the White House's efforts to push for the antitrust measure.

"We supported it along the way," he said, adding, "We repeatedly and unconditionally voiced support for a bipartisan bill of that nature."