Thursday, March 28, 2024

From prison to president: stunning opposition win in Senegal’s election


MARCH 26, 2024

The result of last Sunday’s election offers a prospect of real change for the west African country, argues Mike Phipps.

“Senegal’s anti-establishment candidate looks almost certain to become president after a stunning election victory that is likely to steer the west African country in a radical new direction,” reports the Guardian.

“A little over a week after his release from prison, Bassirou Diomaye Faye is almost certain to be declared the country’s next president after his main rival unexpectedly called him to concede defeat.”

Faye’s outright victory, with 55% of the vote,  constitutes a clear rejection of Macky Sall, the incumbent president whose twelve years in office saw spiralling poverty and unemployment, as well as increasing repression and attacks on civil liberties.

The election result is a triumph for democracy in a region where there have been eight military coups since 2020. Yet Senegal’s election almost didn’t happen:  Sall sought to postpone it in February and was forced backtrack only after massive opposition on the streets.

So who is Faye? Senegal’s youngest ever president is an anti-corruption candidate. He was released from prison only this month along with his mentor Ousmane Sonko, who was disqualified from standing in the election because of a defamation conviction. Both are former tax inspectors. Faye spent more than 11 months in prison for a Facebook post that the regime deemed subversive.

Ahead of Sunday’s election, Faye published a declaration of his assets, and called on other candidates to do the same. It lists a home in Dakar, and land outside the capital and in his hometown. His bank accounts hold roughly $6,600.

A victory for Faye is a good sign for democracy in Senegal, according to  Alioune Tine, founder of the think tank Afrikajom Center and Amnesty International’s former regional director for West and Central Africa. “Democracy was sick with political violence, with state violence, with death,” he told Al Jazeera, adding that Sonko being barred from contesting the election further showed that democracy was in an unhealthy state.

Faye had to fight the election as an independent after the dissolution of his Patriots of Senegal (PASTEF) party last July for supposedly causing unrest. The PASTEF party, which was founded by Sonko in 2014, endorsed Faye. It won a third of the parliamentary seats in the 2022 National Assembly election after forming an alliance with four other parties.

Faye is a left wing pan-Africanist who has campaigned for a fundamental reshaping of Senegal’s relationship with its former colonial power, France, which he says exercises an “economic stranglehold” on Senegal. He wants Senegal to cease using the African Financial Community (CFA) franc—a unit of currency that was pegged to the French franc, and now to the euro.

The principle behind the arrangement is simple: to give France economic control over African states, which it exercises by use of currency devaluation, which can have a disastrous effect on local economies. Macron is an enthusiastic supporter of this colonial relic.

“Convinced that full independence cannot be achieved without controlling the economy, livestock management, fisheries and agriculture, we are fully committed to achieving food, digital, fiscal, energy and scientific sovereignty,” Faye says in an introduction to his election manifesto.

Faye has also promised to renegotiate mining and gas contracts sighed with foreign countries. Along with other African leaders, he is highly critical of these contracts, which guarantee the mining of minerals that will help European countries achieve their transition to cleaner energy. Many of them replicate the same colonial practices seen in the era of fossil fuel extractivism – low royalties, few environmental safeguards, undermining traditional ways of life for small farmers and herders. The issue is assuming increasing importance for countries rich in these new resources.

France continues to keep a contingent of troops in Senegal, as it does with other former colonies in the region. As elsewhere, younger Senegalese want to see an end to this.

Faye has also pledged to reduce presidential powers, make the judiciary more independent and reform land ownership. The earlier jailing of Faye and Sonko underlined the concern shared by many that the judiciary has been politically manipulated to harass the outgoing president’s opponents.

Faye appeals to younger voters –  60 percent of the population is under 25 – who are in the forefront of the demands for change. Unemployment is 20 percent and poverty stands at 40 percent. Young Senegalese had grown bitterly hostile to the outgoing regime which last year authorised police to fire on protesters with live rounds, causing two dozen fatalities and injuring hundreds. Macky Sall’s attacks on democracy also included shutting down the country’s prestigious University Cheikh Anta Diop and cracking down on journalists.

In avoiding the military coups that have hit so much of the region, Senegal has come to be seen as a model of democracy in west Africa. This election offers an opportunity to add some meaningful content to that image.

Mike Phipps’ book Don’t Stop Thinking About Tomorrow: The Labour Party after Jeremy Corbyn (OR Books, 2022) can be ordered here.

The Battle for the Torygraph

Gabrielle Pickard-Whitehead
23 March, 2024 
Left Foot Forward

Abu Dhabi-backed investment fund RedBird IMI’s hunt for profitable investments in media, sport and entertainment in Britain, has hit regulatory obstacles in its bid for the Telegraph and its right-wing stablemate the Spectator.




The battle for the Torygraph is heating up. A controversial bid by Redbird IMI, an entity run by former CNN head Jeff Zucker and backed financially by the United Arab Emirates, has been met by fierce opposition within UK Conservative political and media circles. Andrew Neil branded the idea of a foreign government, and particularly a dictatorship, owning the publication as ‘absurd.’ Also vying for ownership are two domestic media giants, Murdoch’s News UK Corp. and the Daily Mail and General Trust (DMGT). Between them and Reach Publishing, they already control 90 percent of Britain’s newspaper circulation. Taking over the Telegraph would therefore add to Britain’s worrying lack of media plurality even further. The fourth horse in the race is Sir Paul Marshall, the GB News owner, recently accused of endorsing far-right, Islamophobic, homophobic and conspiracy theory posts. Giving the hedge fund millionaire another media platform to flex his right-wing muscle should concern us all.

It’s safe to say that the future of the Torygraph looks none too rosy. And as so often with Tory shenanigans, the story reeks of hypocrisy.

Post-Brexit, the UK government has been actively seeking investments from the Gulf to help sustain the economy. Football clubs, prime London property, media outlets and lucrative deals with BP; a growing number of Britain’s assets are being invested in and bought up by our oil-rich allies in the Middle East. Such is the scale of multibillion-dollar investments streaming from highly repressive Gulf states, namely the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Saudi Arabia, into UK institutions, that Gulf investors refer to London as the ‘eighth emirate’ of the UAE.

Such investment is often at the expense of human rights. In 2021, the UK halved its foreign aid to Yemen while continuing its arming of the Saudi-led coalition in the war-torn country. Over last five years, Britain has sold over £75m worth of spyware, including wiretaps and telecom interception equipment to spy on dissidents to more than 17 countries, including the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Bahrain.

Amid our unrelenting courting of oil-rich sheiks of repressive Gulf States, RedBird IMI, a joint venture between the American private equity firm RedBird Capital Partners and Abu Dhabi-based International Media Investments (IMI), has its eye on the Telegraph and its right-wing stablemate the Spectator. RedBird IMI was launched in late 2022 with Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed al-Nahyan, a member of the Abu Dhabi ruling family, deputy prime minister of the UAE and owner of Manchester City football club, as a major backer and beneficiary of the fund.

RedBird IMI has been on something of a spending spree of late, acquiring the UK production company, All3Media, creators of hit shows, including Fleabag and Squid Game: The Challenge. But the company’s hunt for profitable investments in media, sport and entertainment, has hit regulatory obstacles in its bid for the right-wing titles.

The purchase, which is supported by Sheikh Mansour, would see the newspaper, currently valued at a reported £600m, come under full Emirati ownership. The transaction would reportedly include the UAE paying off the £1.2bn worth of debt that is owed to Lloyd’s Bank by the newspaper’s current owners, the Barclay family.

But the deal has sparked fierce resistance from some Tory MPs who are concerned about the newspaper’s editorial freedom. Scrambling to introduce laws to stop foreign governments being able to own British newspapers, over 100 MPs signed a letter opposing the buyout, pointing to the UAE’s poor domestic record on press freedom.

“If major newspaper and media organisations can be purchased by foreign governments, the freedom of the press has the potential to be seriously undermined. No other democracy in the world has allowed a media outlet to be controlled by a foreign government. This is a dangerous Rubicon we should not cross,” the MPs wrote in a letter to the culture secretary, Lucy Frazer.

The media regulator Ofcom has warned that the UAE has “clear political and broader commercial incentives to influence the editorial line” of the Telegraph. Frazer said the regulator has found that RedBird IMI, could look to exert influence over the newspaper’s output, particularly in matters relating to the Middle Eastern country.

The furore over the IMI ownership bid of the Telegraph raises questions about the double standards involving foreign influence on our media assets.

In 2010, Russian businessman and a former member of the KGB, Alexander Lebedev, bought the Independent, having taken control of London’s Evening Standard a year earlier. Lebedev later transferred control of the titles to his son, Evgeny, a friend of Boris Johnson’s. In 2022, Alexander Lebedev quit his role at the Independent, after being placed under economic sanctions by Canada for “directly enabling” the Russian war in Ukraine. Despite concerns from senior government officials over Evgeny Lebedev’s links to Russia, shortly after becoming prime minister, Boris Johnson appointed Lebedev to the House of Lords. Several years earlier in 2017, Saudi property investor Sultan Muhammad Abuljadayel had bought a 30 percent stake in the Independent’s online newspaper. Amol Rajan, the BBC’s media editor and former editor of the Independent, described Abuljadayel as a “rich man who wants to be richer, in short; and a Saudi investor seeking influence.”

“Money and influence are the two main reasons that people invest in media, and there’s no reason to think Abuljadayel is any different,” Rajan said.



If a similar fate was to lay in store for the Telegraph by essentially giving Adu Dhabi editorial control of the titles, then critics of the UAE ownership bid would surely have a point. But then again, how much editorial freedom exists at the Telegraph, or most other British nationals for that matter, where coverage is skewed by the political interests of their owners, is questionable anyway.

The Telegraph hasn’t earned its ‘Torygraph’ moniker without good reason. The daily broadsheet has endorsed the Conservative Party at every general election in Britain since 1945. When the newspaper celebrated its 100th birthday in 1955, it received a message of congratulations from its columnist Winston Churchill, who pointed out that he was the oldest and longest-serving member of the paper’s staff.

When the Barclay brothers bought the Telegraph Group in 2004 for around £665m, Sir David Barclay suggested that the Daily Telegraph might no longer be the ‘house newspaper’ for the Conservatives. Such suggestions however failed to materialise, as the newspaper maintained and even upped its Tory party bias.

Prior to the 2010 general election, the Telegraph’s chairman texted David Cameron every day to suggest the Conservative leader spoke to the editor to ensure his party’s message was getting across in the newspaper. In 2015, the daily was fined £30,000 for sending an unsolicited email to hundreds of thousands of its subscribers urging them to vote for the Conservatives. During the Tory leadership election in 2019, the Telegraph endorsed its former columnist, Boris Johnson. The New Statesman described the broadsheet as ‘more of a parish newsletter churning out press releases for Boris Johnson’s campaign team than an actual newspaper.’



When you consider the decades-long political influence of the newspaper slanted heavily in the Conservatives’ favour, the hoo-hah about its sale to the UAE within Tory circles is not difficult to understand.

It looks like Middle East control of the Telegraph is immaterial anyway as the deal has all but been derailed. The question is, who are the other bidders, and would they be preferable to Mansour’s IMI?

According to the Telegraph, Murdoch’s News Corp UK and the DMGT have held talks about a potential takeover of the titles.

The “Who Owns the UK Media?” 2023 report, published by the Media Reform Coalition, found that three companies – DMGT Media, News Corp UK and Reach – control 90 percent of the UK’s national newspaper market. These three groups also account for over 40 percent of total audience reach of the 50 largest online news brands in the UK.

DMGT is owned by Jonathan Harmsworth, 4th Viscount Rothermere and great-grandson of the Daily Mail’s founder, Lord Rothermere, who was a staunch admirer of Hitler and Mussolini. If DMGT Media is successful in taking over the Telegraph, then a single publisher would be close to controlling half of all the national newspaper circulation in Britain.

But the US-Australian billionaire Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp UK has also expressed interest in adding the titles to his media business. Murdoch, who handed over operations to his son Lachlan last year but still plays a role in the business, has a shrewd understanding of how media and power work. With the Sun, the Times, and Sunday Times, News UK already controls one-third of the nation’s newspaper market, as well as other UK media assets including talkSport.

But there is another party interested in getting its hands on the Conservative media titans. Paul Marshall, the hedge fund founder who funds GB News and donates generously to the Conservatives, wants to add the Telegraph to his rapidly-growing empire. Marshall also owns UnHerd, one of the biggest sites for political commentary in the UK.

The hedge fund billionaire is now considered the frontrunner to ownership race, despite having been found to have liked and shared multiple far-right, Islamophobic, homophobic and conspiracy theory posts online.

A source close to Marshall said: “If it comes up at the right price and at the right time, he will consider it.”

In response to the accusations that Marshall had endorsed far-right social media posts, his rival for ownership of the Telegraph, Jeff Zucker, said the GB News owner is “unfit to own a newspaper.”

Analysis by the Press Gazette confirms how right-wing political bias strongly dominates Britain’s newspaper circulation, with six of the daily nationals being right-wing, five supposedly neutral, and just two left-wing. The left-leaning papers have an average daily circulation of 300,000 and their right-wing counterparts have a circulation of 2,100,000

.

Giving politically motivated media moguls an even tighter grip on an already highly concentrated press landscape by taking over the Telegraph and Spectator would surely mark a dark day for media plurality in Britain.

But then how UAE ownership would pan out is anybody’s question. If we consider how Abu Dhabi ownership has transformed Manchester City football club, perhaps the latter would be the lesser of the evils, at least from a business perspective? Then again, giving a repressive state without a democratic government control of a British media institution that is supposed to be part of our nation’s democratic process, is surely not what the country wants or needs?

Isn’t there a more left-wing investor out there with a spare £600m who might be interested in buying the Telegraph and giving Britain’s media that is heavily tilted to the Right some much-needed alternative perspectives? Sadly, capitalism tends not to work that way.

Right-Wing Media Watch – ‘Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown’; Plots upon plots or when is a plot not a plot?

Following a pathetically lame plot to get Boris Johnson back at No. 10, the right-wing media seemed to have set their sights on Penny Mordaunt.

‘Will Penny Mordaunt be the next prime minister?’ asked the Spectator this week, in what was another Tory title to devote editorial space to speculation about a so-called plot to oust Rishi Sunak and replace him with the Leader of the House of Commons.

The reports first emerged in the Daily Mail and Daily Telegraph last weekend. ‘Plot to crown Penny Mordaunt as PM: Tory MPs on Right have held secret talks with moderates about replacing Rishi Sunak with Leader of House,’ was the lead story on the Mail’s front page on Saturday.



“Ms Mordaunt has been identified as a potential standard-bearer for Tory moderates in a future contest in which right-wingers such as Kemi Badenoch and Suella Braverman would start as favourites,” the article continued.
By the Monday however, the newspapers had taken a notably different tone, deciding to leap to the beleaguered Prime Minister’s defence.

‘Rishi Sunak’s allies rage at Penny Mordaunt after she fails to quash rumours of a coup against the PM and Tory MPs spending the weekend plotting,’ splashed the Mail, insisting that the Prime Minister is ‘set to launch a political fightback after a torrid week.’

‘Mordant could lose seat – so stick with Sunak, says PM’s allies,’ headlined the Telegraph.

‘Penny Mordaunt isn’t the answer, her only ideology is mushy Blairite progressivism,’ claimed the Spectator.

Such antagonistic reports came despite Mordaunt having made no public comment on the speculation, but with sources close to her having dismissed the claims as “nonsense.”

In early March, Mordaunt was ranked as the most popular Cabinet minister among Tory party members, overtaking Kemi Badenoch. Suggestions have been made that as she is becoming increasingly attractive to centrists in the party, which could enable her to defeat right-wingers like Kemi Badenoch, the Sunak ousting plot was a deliberate ploy designed to scupper her chances in a leadership battle when he steps down. Speaking to i News, an ally of Mordaunt said that the briefings were an attempt to ruin her prospects as leader.

“I suspect what is partly behind this is people trying to make it difficult for her in future. It’s interesting that Kemi [Badenoch] is quite so loud on this,” the MP said.

Could the right-wing media’s deliberate amplification of the Penny Mordaunt rumour be an attempt to trash the Leader of the Commons’ prospects of the Tory crown once Rishi Sunak steps down?

Of course, the last thing the Tories need is another leadership circus. But as we move closer to the election, no doubt there will be more plots in the pipeline by the Conservative media as they set out to distract from the utter chaos engulfing the Prime Minister. It’s also likely that the Mordaunt plot has yet to run its course.

Woke-Bashing of the Week – Nike enrages the anti-woke bridage after changing the colours of the St. George’s flag

Nike is the latest brand to find itself in the firing line of the woke-loathing squad. According to reports peddled by the usual media suspects, the Mail Online, Daily Express and GB News, England fans are furious about the sports brand’s update to the St George’s cross on the back of the new Three Lions short.

Supporters have apparently been left enraged when it was revealed that Nike had replaced the horizontal line on the traditional red cross with a navy blue, light blue, and pink one, despite the kits appearing to be a nod to the 1966 World Cup winners’ training kit, which contained blue, red and purple.



Tweeting the launch of the new kit, Nike wrote: “A playful update to the St. George appears on the collar to unite and inspire.”

Leading the backlash were the same old names. Nigel Farage and Brandan Clarke-Smith were said to be fuming, while Reform UK MP Lee Anderson described the move as ‘virtue signalling woke nonsense.’

“The left have a nerve to ask me why I want my country back.

‘This virtue signalling, namby-pamby, pearl-clutching woke nonsense must stop. Any more of this and I’ll be on the first flight to Rwanda,” Anderson told the Daily Express. (We can live in hope!)

Disappointingly but sadly not that surprisingly given his courting of the Murdoch media, including attending the media magnate’s midsummer party last year, Keir Starmer waded into the furore. In a grilling about the story by the Sun editor Harry Cole on the newspaper’s new politics show Never Mind the Ballots, the Labour leader said the original colours were ‘unifying’ and called for the label to be changed back, while recommending for the shirts to be reduced in price.

Naturally, the Sun went into reactionary overdrive, with the sensationalising headline: ‘Keir gets shirty: Keir Starmer blasts hated change to England footie short on Sun’s new politics show and demands kits must be cheaper.’

As well as collaborating with the right-wing newspaper, Starmer’s comments are disappointing given the Right’s history of reactionary objection to some of the England team’s gestures of unity and inclusion.

During the 2020 Euros, the simple act of kneeling against racism for several seconds before each game prompted so much outrage among the Right that the prime minister had to step in and attempt to quell the panic. Predictably, Lee Anderson, then a Tory MP of course, was so dumbstruck, he decided to boycott the team in protest.

It will be interesting what lies ahead for the ‘woke’ England team, their ‘woke’ manager, and their ‘woke’ kit designers, at this year’s Euros in Germany. No doubt the self-appointed ringleaders will be getting deliberately wound up as a means of bolstering their own niche political causes.

Fortunately, most of us respect the England team’s quest for tolerance, fairness, and unity, and couldn’t care a less about the design of a flag label on the back of the players’ shirts. We just want to watch a decent game of football.



Gabrielle Pickard-Whitehead is author of Right-Wing Watch
Foreign Office faces legal challenge over pause in UNRWA funding for Gaza

Yesterday
Left Foot Forward

UK could be sued over decision to stop funding a key UN agency delivering aid to Gaza



A legal challenge is to be launched against the Foreign Office over its decision to pause funding for the UN’s Palestinian refugee agency.

On behalf of a British-Palestinian man with family in Gaza, Bindmans LLP has issued a pre-action letter to the government department warning, if funding is not reinstated by Tuesday 2, April, the client will issue judicial review proceedings in the High Court.

The legal challenge claims that the government’s decision to withdraw funds from the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) on 27, January was decided, “illogically and without due consideration of evidence, of international obligations, or of FCDO decision-making frameworks”.

Funding was paused by 10 governments including Australia, the United States and Canada following allegations by the Israeli authorities that several UNRWA staff were involved in the October 7 Hamas attacks.

Following the allegations, two investigations were initiated and the alleged staff were suspended. UN investigators are yet to receive sufficient evidence of the claims while countries including Australia, Canada and Sweden have since reinstated funding amid concerns about the worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

The International Centre of Justice for Palestinians (ICJP) has provided evidence and financial support for the client, whose parents are UNRWA-registered refugees and have already reported major shortages of food, water and essentials.

It comes as over one million people in Gaza are expected to face ‘catastrophic’ levels of hunger with the UN warning of imminent famine in northern Gaza.

ICJP Senior Public Affairs Officer Jonathan Purcell said: “When the decision to withdraw funds was taken, it was illogical. Now, with Gaza staring famine in the face, it is unconscionable. The government must restore funding immediately, if it doesn’t wish to be complicit in the thousands of deaths by hunger and thirst which are, terribly, very likely to occur in the months to come.”

As the largest aid-provider for Palestinians, established in 1948, at least 50% of UK government aid to Palestinians has gone through UNRWA.

Alice Hardy, Partner at Bindmans with conduct of the case, said: “The UK government’s strategy for international development sets out four priorities, including to: ‘provide life-saving humanitarian assistance and work to prevent the worst forms of human suffering’.

“Given the catastrophic situation in Gaza, including an impending, man-made famine, the ongoing decision to cease funding to UNRWA is not only morally wrong but flies in the face of that strategy.”

The Foreign Office was contacted for comment.

(Image credit: Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office)

Hannah Davenport is news reporter at Left Foot Forward, focusing on trade unions and environmental issues
UK
Unite’s Sharon Graham slams ‘disgraceful’ Centrica CEO pay which doubles to over £8 million

Yesterday
Left Foot Forward

"Make no mistake, Chris O'Shea’s multi-million pound pay rise has been paid for by workers and their families who have struggled with rocketing energy bills."

Unite the Union’s General Secretary Sharon Graham has slammed Centrica’s CEO after he saw his pay packet more than double to £8.2m, at a time when millions are struggling due to the cost of living crisis.

Centrica, the owner of British Gas, has seen its share prices rise steadily over the past two years, which has coincided with a surge in global gas prices after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

The company has decided to more than double its chief executives pay packet. Chris O’Shea earned a basic salary of £903,000, which was topped up by cash and share bonuses worth an extra £7.3m.

The decision to pay him more than double what he earned last year, has been met with much criticism, with the General Secretary of Unite the Union slamming it as ‘disgraceful’.

Sharon Graham said: “Make no mistake, Chris O’Shea’s multi-million pound pay rise has been paid for by workers and their families who have struggled with rocketing energy bills.

“It is a disgrace that profiteering from companies like Centrica is still allowed to go unchecked. Unite is calling for a return to public ownership of our energy infrastructure so that we can bring down customers’ bills and supply British industry with cheaper energy.”

Basit Mahmood is editor of Left Foot Forward



Top 5 big Unite the union wins so far this year
26 March, 2024 
Left Foot Forward
News Trade Unions

Here are some of the impressive pay rises gained by union members through collective bargaining so far this year



Unions have helped secure much needed pay rises for workers across the country, here are the top five over the past three months from one of the UK’s largest unions Unite.


1. 25% pay rise for parking officers

Parking enforcement officers won an impressive 25% pay rise in Slough after a month of industrial action. 40 workers employed by Saba Park Services will benefit from an increase in the lowest hourly pay to £13.20 from £10.50.

Membership in the workplace tripled from 13 to 40 as Unite also established recognition during negotiations. The union said the victory came after Slough’s Conservative council had washed its hands of the dispute, saying it didn’t believe it had a role to play in the dispute.

2. Lump sum payment won for Mitie workers


Following a long campaign lobbying the private sector outsourced company Mitie and the government, healthcare workers in the west midlands were awarded over £1600 lump sum payments they were owed.

Mitie eventually agreed to pay the lump sum following strike action and determination from the members who worked in roles including catering and admin roles at hospitals in Dudley, and who ‘stood strong and lobbied hard’ for their payment.

3. Workers get ‘much needed’ pay boost in cost-of-living crisis


Workers for the Suntory Beverage & Food in Gloucestershire, which produces Lucozande and Ribena, secured a 5.5% pay increase, calling off escalated strike action.

It followed a broken promise by the company to review staff pay should inflation exceed five per cent before June 2023. However fresh talks were held after strikes last month and a deal was settled, providing members with the “much needed support during a difficult economic period”, the regional officer said.

4. Tram drivers pay soars up by 33% in two years


Metro tram drivers in the West Midlands secured a 13.5% pay rise in February, negotiated without the need for industrial action.

However the tram drivers have had a 33.6% total increase in wages since 2022, after gaining a 20% rise in 2022 after taking strike action and seeing their salaries leap from £22,000 to £30,100, getting a “well-deserved increase” after being paid “too little for what they did”, Sharon Graham Unite’s general secretary said.

5. ‘Outstanding’ pay rise for thousands of construction workers

Thousands of construction workers benefited from a two-year pay rise worth a minimum of 17.4% which Graham hailed as an “outstanding deal”. 3,000 workers who carry out essential repair and maintenance work on oil refineries, power stations and plants benefited from the uplift following a strike ballot.

“This outstanding deal was achieved because our members knew the NAECI employers could not ignore their demands if they acted collectively,” said Graham.

(Image credit: Garry Knight – Creative Commons)

Hannah Davenport is news reporter at Left Foot Forward, focusing on trade unions and environmental issues
UK
Over 50,000 sign petition calling to close legal loophole that subjects seafarers to appalling work conditions


24 March, 2024
Left Foot Forward

‘Employment conditions for P&O Ferries agency crew have further deteriorated, fire and re-hire has not been banned and the government has continued to spend taxpayers' money on P&O Ferries.'



P&O Ferries is embroiled in yet another scandal, this time involving how much it pays employees.

March 17, 2024, marked the two-year anniversary since the ferry operator, which is owned by the Dubai-based DP World, sacked 786 of its direct employees. It was considered the most egregious act of corporate vandalism in recent history.

At the time, the then Transport Secretary Grant Shapps announced to the House of Commons a “package of nine measures that will force it [P&O Ferries] to fundamentally rethink its decision and send a clear message to the maritime industry that we will not allow this to happen again…where new laws are needed, we will create them…where legal loopholes are cynically exploited, we will close them, and that where employment rights are too weak, we will strengthen them.”

Two years on and the nine measures have failed to deliver the protections they promised or close loopholes that would enable further poor treatment of seafarers.

Due to one ongoing legal loophole that the government promised it would close, P&O Ferries has been paying some crew members less than half the UK minimum wage.

An analysis of payslips by ITV News and the Guardian, revealed that agency workers for P&O Ferries have been, in some cases, earning £4.87 an hour, less than the £5.15 an hour that the company had suggested was its lowest pay rate, and well below the minimum wage of £10.42 an hour. Many crew members are reportedly working 12-hour shifts, and do not get a day off for months. One employee said the working conditions were like being ‘in jail.’

Without adequate action at government level, a campaign has been launched calling on the current and future governments to take action to prevent another P&O Ferries’ scandal.

Launched by the global trade union Nautilus and the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT), the campaign notes how the government’s Seafarer’s Wages Act, introduced in 2023, requires operators to pay crew at least the National Minimum Wage for work within UK waters. However, the Act does nothing to prevent P&O Ferries and other operators from hiring agency seafarers on low rates of pay and roster patterns, even in the Channel.

The unions also warn how legal loopholes in the Trade Union Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, which have been exploited by P&O Ferries, have not been closed.

“Employment conditions for P&O Ferries agency crew have further deteriorated, fire and re-hire has not been banned and the government has continued to spend taxpayers’ money on P&O Ferries,” the campaign states.

The unions are calling for a mandatory Seafarers Charter, for legal loopholes to be closed, for there to be a new deal for seafarers, for fair pay agreements on international ferry routes to be introduced, and for fire and rehire to be outlawed.

Over 52,000 people have had added their names to the petition calling for action to be taken to prevent another P&O Ferries’ jobs massacre.

Gabrielle Pickard-Whitehead is a contributing editor to Left Foot Forward
UK
Doctors and teachers have faced ‘unprecedented’ pay cuts in recent years, IFS says
26 March, 2024 
Left Foot Forward

Average public sector pay at the end of 2023 was 1% lower than at the start of 2007



Since 2007 doctors and experienced teachers have faced ‘unprecedented’ pay cuts, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has said, as a new report showed recent trends in public sector pay.

Doctors have seen the biggest fall in their average pay in real terms, almost 15% lower today than in 2010 according to the research group while teachers’ pay is lower by about 9%, with cuts even larger for more experienced workers in the profession.

This is in comparison to private sector pay which rose by 4% from 2007 to 2023, while real public sector pay at the end of 2023 was 1% lower than at the start of 2007, the report found.

Despite recent pay increases in the public sector following industrial action, between December 2019 and November 2023 the IFS said average public sector pay fell by 0.3% in this period, compared to a 2.3% rise in the private sector.

Consistently cutting the pay of higher-paid public sector workers has only contributed to both the recruitment and retention crisis and ‘industrial strife’, IFS associate director Jonathan Cribb said, as the think tank highlighted the gap between higher-and-lower paid public sector workers has fallen by a third since 2007.

Nurses in England also fared particularly badly over the past 14 years with a significant reduction in their real pay and only a modest recovery in recent years.

Commenting on the findings, The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) said the research should be ‘essential reading for government ministers’ towards supporting fair pay in the profession.

“With repeated below-inflation pay awards, and the lowest pay deal in the entire public sector last year, ministers exposed nursing staff to a brutal cost of living crisis,” RCN general secretary Pat Cullen said.

“Experienced nurses are leaving for better pay abroad in soaring numbers too. These two trends are a direct consequence of the repeated political decisions to keep NHS pay down.



Hannah Davenport is news reporter at Left Foot Forward, focusing on trade unions and environmental issues
Junior doctors in Wales start longest walkout to date

25 March, 2024 
Left Foot Forward


The Welsh government says it will continue to press the UK government for the necessary funding to ensure “full and fair pay rises for public sector workers.”



Thousands of junior doctors in Wales have begun a four-day strike today in what is their longest period of industrial action to date.

The strike will run from 7am on March 25 to 7am on March 29. Around 3,000 junior doctors are expected to picket outside hospitals across Wales. The latest strike is the third walkout by junior doctors in Wales this year.

The British Medical Association (BMA) described the situation as “extremely sad,” but, with their pay having dropped by almost a third in 15 years, they have been left with no choice.

Commenting on the situation, Dr Peter Fahey, co-chair of BMA Cymru Wales’ Junior Doctors Committee and Dr Oba Babs-Osibodu said: “It’s extremely sad and frustrating that we find ourselves here again, our third strike and our longest yet. We don’t want to be in this position but again, faced with inaction, we are left with no choice.

The doctors said that they wanted to reiterate that the industrial action can be called off at any time “if the Welsh Government put forward a credible pay offer to form the basis of talks.

“Whilst we continue to be undervalued, and disregarded for our work in the health service our resolve to restore our pay remains unbroken, enough is enough.”

They noted how that when they start their career, junior doctors in Wales earn just £13.65 an hour.

“Is that all they are worth? They are providing lifesaving care after training for years and are shouldering up to £100,000 of debt.

“We will continue our fight for fair pay for all doctors working in the NHS. It is no surprise that we are losing doctors as they search for better pay and conditions elsewhere,” the doctors continued.

The Welsh government says it cannot afford a pay rise that is more than five percent. It says it will continue to press the UK government for the necessary funding to ensure “full and fair pay rises for public sector workers”.

In response to the latest walkout in Wales, the UK government said: “The Welsh government is well funded to deliver on its devolved responsibilities – including health – as we are providing it with a record £18bn per year settlement, the highest since devolution.

“It must ultimately answer to the Senedd and the people of Wales on how it chooses to fund services.”

Urgent and emergency care will continue to be provided during the 96-hour period of industrial action.

Gabrielle Pickard-Whitehead is a contributing editor to Left Foot Forward





We must campaign for a Wales which has the powers it needs to create true equality for all


Today
Left Foot Forward
Opinion

We cannot gamble with people’s lives on waiting for a more progressive government in Westminster – for our action plan to have teeth, we must set out the steps for taking the power to enact it

.


The steps outside the Senedd (Welsh Parliament) are impressive. Wider than the building, and crafted from slate extracted from our land, they’re intended to draw the public up and into the heart of our glass clad, refreshingly open, national democracy.

With the roof reaching far over the steps, and our often inclement weather, they make the perfect place for a protest!

And that’s where I found myself last Sunday about to address the Stand Up To Racism rally.

As I stood there in front of a lively crowd, my mind was on three things.

Firstly, in that building behind me, the Senedd was on the brink of electing its first black First Minister – a first for Wales, and a first for any European nation.

My second thought was the contrast to the parliament at the other end of the M4, where we’d just witnessed the deplorable treatment of Diane Abbott MP: starting with the racist comments made by a Tory donor, whose words I don’t want to echo here, and then witnessing her being stood over by the Speaker for trying to speak on a discussion about racism and, well, Diane Abbott.

Thirdly, I was acutely aware of the role of politicians in demonstrating responsibility for such globally important topics as racism, for calling it out and stopping the hate.

What we’ve seen all too often in these polarised times, is an ‘othering’ which is at the heart of prejudice, and which is being driven and manipulated by right wing politicians and media to create division and embolden prejudice.

We’ve made some steps in the right direction in the Senedd. My party, Plaid Cymru, is proud to have worked with Labour Welsh Government via our Co-operation Agreement, on the Anti-Racist Wales Action Plan – a plan to address and eradicate racism in Wales. This plan shows so clearly our shared values of fairness, tolerance and justice, of protecting and bestowing rights, not taking them away, and our shared determination to call out bigotry, hatred, inequality and discrimination in all corners of our nation.

However, what’s also clear is that we must see action and change, and not just warm words.

We must go further and campaign for a Wales which has the powers it needs to create true equality for all, forged from a shared history, to meet the challenges which disproportionately affect some of our citizens compared to others.

Shared History

There are aspects to celebrate in that shared history, such as the translations of the slave narratives of John Marrant, Moses Roper and Josiah Henson into Welsh in the nineteenth century, which fired the radical abolitionist zeal of the Welsh; and the connections with Paul Robeson, who argued that he witnessed the unity of working people of all races in Wales.

There is also, of course, the history of racism: the 1919 riots that devastated Cardiff; the popularity of blackface minstrelsy in Welsh carnivals and on British TV, long after those racist practices had ceased in the US.

And more recently, the wrongful imprisonment of John Actie, Ronnie Actie, Stephen Miller, Tony Paris and Yusef Abdullahi after being falsely accused of murdering 20-year-old Lynette White in Cardiff in 1988. The life sentence given to three of these men – ‘The Cardiff 3’ – is often described as one of the biggest miscarriages of justice in UK legal history, and following which the then chief constable of South Wales police admitted “the disadvantage experienced through the criminal justice system by black communities is real and present.”

Whilst we must recognise and celebrate the contribution of all our citizens to our communities and nation, we must also ensure we appreciate and disrupt the barriers which can hamper all our citizens from playing a full part in our nation’s life.

As the Iraqi-born, Cardiff-based artist, Rabab Ghazoul, has said, Wales as internal colony and contributor to colonialism has “the capacity for both radical empathy and radical responsibility.”

That responsibility is one we must demonstrate as politicians, and it was this thought that was clearest in my mind as I addressed the crowd.

I told them that an action plan is a great start, but if we are serious about human rights, about fairness, about anti-racism here in Wales, then we need the power to implement that plan, and we can’t achieve that change with one hand tied behind our back.

Devolved powers

In Scotland, policing and the criminal justice system has been devolved to the Scottish Government. In Wales, the power still lies in Westminster.

This means that Wales is currently without the power to properly tackle the racist hate crimes which are increasing and which make up the vast majority of hate crime in Wales. It means we are without the power to address the fact that in Wales, black people represent 3.1% of the prison population, despite comprising only 0.9% of the general population; that those from a mixed or Asian ethnicity background are also over-represented and that the average custodial sentence length, between 2010 and 2022, was 8.5 months longer for black defendants than for those from a white ethnic group.

On the wider question of justice, Plaid Cymru believes that the only sustainable way of creating an inclusive and safe criminal justice system for our communities that works for Wales is by creating a system here in Wales, as has been done in Scotland.

We cannot gamble with people’s lives on waiting for a more progressive government in Westminster – for our action plan to have teeth, we must set out the steps for taking the power to enact it.

International stage

I am also clear we must raise our voice as a nation on the international stage.

The silence from too many politicians over the atrocities being committed against the Palestinian people is shameful.

As I stood on those Senedd steps, I reminded them that it was a Plaid Cymru motion calling for a ceasefire in Gaza that was passed by the Senedd in November of last year.

And the crowd had already demonstrated their awareness that politicians from Labour and Tory had voted against this motion. A member of the Labour Welsh Government had spoken before me, and the crowd called him out – and the rest of the government – for abstaining on this motion.

There are some that said our motion was meaningless. After all, responsibility for international policy – like policing and the criminal justice system – lies with Westminster. But as we have done with other conflicts, notably the invasion of Ukraine, we can signal our public condemnation and do what we can to give hope to others. Because, among the dead are relatives and friends of my constituents. People known to us, who we must remember, whose stories we must keep, with whom we share a history.

The citizens of Wales are looking to their politicians to take a stand and call for peace in Gaza, as they did for Ukraine.

Governments picking and choosing which aggressors to call out with moral outrage and concern for populations, and which they remain silent on, is racist.

The crowd in front of me agreed.

We stand together and we must stand with all – against all forms of racism, and in these terrible times, against Islamophobia and against Antisemitism. We must not let anyone divide us in that.


Sioned Williams MS is Member of Senedd for South Wales West, and she is Plaid Cymru’s spokesperson on Social Justice, Social Services and Equalities.

Controversy and challenges for Wales’ new First Minister

 By Maggie Simpson

MARCH 27, 2024

Vaughan Gething MS was confirmed as Wales’ new First Minister last week.  He is the first black man to hold this position and indeed is the first black leader of a national government in Europe.

Vaughan succeeds Mark Drakeford after a close fought election for Welsh Labour leader which he secured against Jeremy Miles MS by 51.7% to 48.3% of the vote.

 Welsh Labour Grassroots sent a series of policy questions to the two candidates at the start of the election. But responses from the candidates were such that WLG was unable to recommend support for either candidate.

 There was a major issue during the election campaign of a £200,000 donation to the Vaughan Gething campaign from a businessman whose company has twice been convicted of environmental offences.  This is a significant sum of money for a campaign when in the last such election the successful candidate used just £25,000.  There are already calls for the money to be repaid and for guidelines on election expenditure to be looked at.

Mark Drakeford’s government was of the centre-left.  Among its achievements are Senedd reform in partnership with Plaid Cymru and the Independent Commission on the Constitutional future of Wales whose final report was delivered in January.

 There are no academy schools or foundation hospitals in Wales but free bus passes for the over 60s, free prescriptions and universal free school meals in primary schools.  A Social Partnership Council with trade unions and business has been established and there has been progress on work across all the equality strands.

 Nonetheless, there are major budgetary challenges, difficulty of public service delivery through austerity and tackling the climate emergency.  The introduction of 20mph zones in residential areas has provoked widespread discontent.  Moreover, the Welsh government failed to support an immediate ceasefire in Gaza despite a Senedd vote for it and the Covid Inquiry in Wales has revealed that 68% of those who died in Wales were disabled people, an even higher ratio than the 59% of those deaths in the UK as a whole.  

 Vaughan Gething will face significant challenges as First Minister. As a supporter of both Tony Blair and Keir Starmer, his government will undoubtedly differ from that of Mark Drakeford.  Welsh Labour Grassroots issued a policy document during the leadership campaign outlining key socialist policies that it will continue to campaign for. Readers can see it here.

‘Clear red water’ was the term coined to describe the policy differences between Welsh Labour and the Blair governments.  Clear red water between Wales and Westminster will need to be maintained as necessary, if poverty, inequality and wellbeing in Wales are to be addressed in the coming years.

Candidates supported by Welsh Labour Grassroots for the Wales National Policy Forum seats

Maggie Simpson is a member of Welsh Labour Grassroots steering committee and the executive committee of the Campaign for Labour Party Democracy.

Paul Nowak: Conservative attacks on the right to protest threaten free speech, free assembly and open democracy


Opinion

'The threat to protest and the undermining of the right to strike raise questions about the UK’s commitment to open democracy'


No-one can fail to be moved by the scale of suffering in Gaza – and the urgent need for a ceasefire.


The TUC has a clear policy on the conflict in Gaza, which we set out in our General Council statement last October. We called for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire, and for the release of all hostages unharmed. We condemned the attacks by Hamas and their targeting of Israeli civilians. And we set out our concerns about the rising death toll among Palestinians in Gaza as a result of Israeli military operations.

Since we published our statement, 1.7 million Palestinians have been displaced from their homes, and now face the unconscionable prospect of an attack on Rafah. The UN has warned that famine is now imminent in northern Gaza and children are already dying of starvation. This is an appalling and unnecessary human-made catastrophe.

For many years, we have urged the UK government to make genuine efforts towards a just, lasting and comprehensive peace in Israel and Palestine – one that is consistent with international law, is based on a two-state solution, and which promotes equality, democracy and respect for human and labour rights.

What is happening in Gaza has mobilised a mass movement across the world. It is clear where UK public opinion is: demanding that our government do everything in its power to stop the fighting and work towards a just peace.

Yet in recent days we have seen suggestions that trade unions should cut ties with one of the largest pro-Palestinian campaigns in the world – the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC).

PSC is a peaceful antiracist solidarity campaign that seeks to put pressure on UK policymakers for action to secure Palestinian human rights and freedom. It does not engage in violence or intimidation. It prohibits the expression of antisemitic views at its events and is clear that everyone who supports its aims is welcome to join its campaigns.

The TUC rejects the call for trade unions to cut ties with PSC – and the wider implication that unions should disengage from solidarity campaigning in support of Palestinian human rights and an end to the occupation of Palestinian territories.

Trade unions should be free to engage with any group that shares our values. Ministers who have talked repeatedly about the need to ensure free speech should take their own advice, and maintain space for dialogue and debate with those they disagree with.

Earlier this month, the head office of the Palestine General Federation of Trade Unions in Gaza was bombed and destroyed. The trade union movement cannot turn away from fellow workers when they need the support of their sister unions the most. That is why we continue to speak out and put pressure on ministers – and why we have led a trade union appeal for Medical Aid for Palestinians.

Attending peaceful marches and protests and holding MPs to account are time-honoured ways of making your voice heard in a free society. Campaigning for a ceasefire and for the human rights of the Palestinians is legitimate – and the expression of these views must be allowed.

We want our MPs, councillors and their staff to work without fear or harassment – but we must also defend the right to peaceful protests outside town halls and parliament.

At a time when antisemitism and anti-Muslim racism are rising sharply, ministers should be concentrating on tackling racism, rather than stoking unnecessary controversy about peaceful protests. They should lead by example – condemning and calling out racism consistently, especially when it is from within their own party.

The TUC and the whole trade union movement rejects antisemitism. The Israeli people are not responsible for the actions of their government – nor should the wider Jewish community in Britain and around the world be held accountable for what is happening in Israel and Palestine.

I know that at times trade unions have fallen short of our values. We must be vigilant and hold one another to the highest standards. That’s why we produced a guide for trade union reps called talking about antisemitism. Unison have produced a resource with HOPE not hate to help trade unionists recognise and avoid both antisemitism and anti-Muslim racism when talking about the conflict, which every rep should read.

The government’s attempts to shut down solidarity with the Palestinians are part of a wider targeting of protest – against trade unionists, racial justice campaigners and more. We have seen two new laws to crack down on protests in recent years – with another in the works as I write, intended to stop the use of flares, end protests near Parliament and place yet more restrictions on protest organisers. Alongside this, the last decade has seen a concerted attack on the right to strike.

The threat to protest and the undermining of the right to strike raise questions about the UK’s commitment to open democracy and freedom of speech and assembly. It’s time for a reset – for a government that shares our values, and makes space for challenge and criticism.

In a free society, there will always be disagreements between governments, social movements, and trade unions. The right of workers and citizens to organise, negotiate and speak freely is an integral part of thriving democracy.

Our trade union values call us to stand with peaceful protesters for democracy and human rights everywhere. And we will not be swayed from our demands for a ceasefire now and a just and lasting peace in the Middle East.




Paul Nowak is the General Secretary of the Trades Union Congress
How the Tories failure to tackle the housing crisis fuels UK poverty


A recent report found UK housing the 'worse value for money’ of any advanced economy


Recent analysis by the Resolution Foundation found UK housing to be the worst value for money of any advanced economy meaning Brits are being forced to pay much more for much less.

Soaring rents and a lack of social housing while prices rise and wages remain stagnant has seen a housing crisis develop over a decade in the making.

Last week, figures from the Office for National Statistics showed the average monthly rent paid by tenants in the UK rose by 9% in the year, the highest since records began, and well above the rate of wage increases for most people.

Average monthly rents in England hit £1,276, while the UK’s highest average rent could be found unsurprisingly in London at an eye-watering £2,035 per month. However wages are failing to keep up with the spike in housing costs, with median monthly pay for UK workers at £2,250 a month reflecting a discrepancy in affordability.

London Renters Union said that “extortionate housing” plays a “massive role” in the huge number of people currently experiencing absolute poverty in the UK – nearly a fifth of the population.

Poverty has been increasing under this government as recent figures found the UK has seen the biggest rise in absolute poverty for 30 years, to 12 million people in 2022-23.

It comes amid what campaign group Generation Rent has called an affordability crisis as renters have been left stretched to the limits of what they can pay, while the government’s failure to increase social housing has pushed people into the private rented sector and therefore into high costs beyond their means.

Housing charity Crisis said the number of social housing fell by 120,000 between 2012 and 2016, while last year it was revealed that forty councils in England had built no social housing at all for five years due to government cuts.

Speaking on BBC Newsnight this week, one audience member from Cambridge City Food Bank spoke up to stress that new social housing was desperately needed in his area, as high rent was one of the reasons why “so many more people are having to use our food bank”.

A report by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) highlighted that policy makers need to ‘pay closer attention’ to links between housing and poverty and said that efforts to reduce poverty should include limiting rent costs, maintaining good housing conditions and monitoring the impact of welfare reform cuts.

People in ‘housing cost induced poverty’ – not poor before housing costs but poor once they are taken into account – had gone up over the past two decades, the report said, and highlighted how the housing system can act as a buffer against the effects of poverty.

Research by the Resolution Foundation also found Britain’s homes to be the oldest of all European countries making them more prone to damp and higher energy bills due to poor insulation, exacerbating fuel poverty in the UK.

Greenpeace campaigners recently attacked the Tory government for failing to address the cold homes ‘national scandal’, after it was estimated more than 70,000 people have died as a result of cold and damp houses since 2013.

Addressing poor quality, high costs and low security in housing through rent control schemes and more public housing have been stressed as ways to also tackle the disturbing rise of poverty in the UK.


The shocking charts which show the scale of poverty under the Tories

Hannah Davenport 
26 March, 2024 

The UK has seen the biggest rise in absolute poverty for 30 years




On the weekend, the creator of the Thick of It, Armando Iannucci, slammed the government’s response to poverty in an interview with Laura Kuenssberg, comparing the UK to a “Dickens novel” amid rising poverty rates.

It came as new figures found the UK has seen the biggest rise in absolute poverty for 30 years to 12 million people in 2022-23, a rise of 600,000, shedding a light on the sheer political failure to tackle the cost of living crisis.

Child poverty also reached a record high according to the DWP’s official statistics, laying bare the devastating numbers behind the everyday struggles faced by so many people in Britain.

This graph below by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) highlights the shocking rise in food insecurity over the past three years, with the number of people unable to afford enough food soaring by a massive 53% in the last year alone.




JRF senior economist Rachelle Earwaker explained the rise in people experiencing food insecurity through another shocking graph, which highlights the soaring cost of food relative to benefits in the UK, with food prices rising twice as fast as benefits since April. It highlights both the Tories inability to provide an adequate benefits system to support working and non-working families or to curb rising costs.



Food bank use has in turn risen exponentially under the Tories highlighting the scale of need. From the 600,000 packages handed out in Britain in 2010 to the current statistics from the Trussell Trust below which expose the sheer steepness of the rise of those relying on food banks.


The most deprived areas have been hit the hardest by poverty, as a recent chart showed just how badly the Tory Party has let down children in the poorest parts of the country, where child poverty has risen six times faster than in the richest areas.

If UK ministers insist that they’ve done all they can to tackle poverty, you could show them this. A damning graph from UNICEF which compared child poverty in 39 OECD and EU countries, and found the UK bottom of the list, where child poverty has increased by 20% over seven years, faster than any of the other countries.





Hannah Davenport is news reporter at Left Foot Forward, focusing on trade unions and environmental issues