Thursday, December 19, 2024

‘President Musk’ makes his presence felt in Washington

By AFP
December 19, 2024

Elon Musk speaks at a rally for Donald Trump at Madison Square Garden in New York, October 27, 2024. - Copyright AFP ANGELA WEISS

Aurélia END

Elon Musk’s role in wrecking a bipartisan Congress deal to avert a US government shutdown has underlined his extraordinary influence over the Republican Party and the incoming administration of Donald Trump.

In addition to his usual title of the world’s richest man, Democrats are now describing him as “President Musk.”

Musk has been tapped by Trump to run the new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) agency, but the billionaire is throwing his weight around even before the president-elect takes office on January 20.

On Wednesday, shortly after 4:00 am, the hyperactive owner of Tesla and SpaceX used his social platform X to attack the budget bill hammered out by Republicans and Democrats in Congress to keep the federal government operating.

“This bill should not pass,” the 53-year-old Musk wrote in the first of what became a barrage of posts.

“Kill the bill,” he exhorted Republican members of the House of Representatives. “This bill is criminal.”

A number of Republican lawmakers quickly fell in line, with some even engaging in a bit of flattery.

“In five years in Congress, I’ve been awaiting a fundamental change in the dynamic,” Representative Dan Bishop commented on an X post by Musk. “It has arrived.”

Other right-wing members of Congress even went so far as to suggest that the South African-born Musk should take over as House speaker.

Trump himself joined the budget battle later in the day.

The 78-year-old president-elect denounced the spending bill as “ridiculous and extraordinarily expensive.”

The dramatic developments left the country facing a government shutdown just days before Christmas.

Musk rejoiced after the bill was torpedoed. “The voice of the people was heard,” he said. “This was a good day for America.”

He followed up by reposting a picture of himself in front of an American flag with the words “VOX POPULI” and “VOX DEI,” a Latin phrase which translates to “the voice of the people is the voice of God.”

After the intervention, Republicans in Congress on Thursday came up with a new funding package that satisfied Trump — and Musk.

– Who’s in charge? –

Democrats have painted the tech billionaire as unstable and a megalomaniac, and hope calling him “President Musk” will needle Trump.

“Democrats and Republicans spent months negotiating a bipartisan agreement to fund our government,” Senator Bernie Sanders said. “The richest man on Earth, President Elon Musk, doesn’t like it.

“Will Republicans kiss the ring?” Sanders asked. “Billionaires must not be allowed to run our government.”

Democratic Representative Jim McGovern said “at least we know who’s in charge.”

“He’s president and Trump is now vice president,” McGovern said.

Speaking on CNN, David Axelrod, who served as chief strategist for Barack Obama’s White House campaigns, said Musk and Trump need to “get together and decide who the president is.”

Musk’s rapid political ascension is unprecedented. While wealthy patrons have exerted influence before, no unelected businessman has ever wielded such political power.

Musk played a large role in the closing stages of Trump’s presidential campaign, appearing with him at a rally in Pennsylvania on the site where a gunman wounded the Republican candidate, and personally funding a reelection committee.

He has been omnipresent since Trump’s election victory, virtually taking up residence at Trump’s home in Mar-a-Lago Florida where the incoming president is mapping out the transition.

Musk and Amazon owner Jeff Bezos, a space race rival, dined with Trump on Wednesday evening at Mar-a-Lago.

Musk has not been formally named to Trump’s cabinet but his expansive brief of cutting federal government spending has sparked conflict of interest concerns.

SpaceX, for example, depends for a large part on US government contracts.

Musk’s $270 million in political donations during the November election cycle made him the largest political donor in US history.

But he shelled out far more for Twitter (since re-branded as X) in 2022, paying $44 billion.

“It’s weird to think that Elon Musk will end up having paid far less for the United States Government than he did for Twitter,” joked George Conway, a conservative critic.

Looming government shutdown a 'terrifying preview' of Trump and DOGE

Jessica Corbett,
 Common Dreams
December 19, 2024

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump shakes hands with U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) as he meets with House Republicans on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., November 13, 2024. REUTERS/Brian Snyder REFILE - QUALITY REPEAT

U.S. President Trump and his allies, including billionaires Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, are blowing up bipartisan efforts to prevent a government shutdown that could begin this weekend with statements opposing a proposed stopgap measure.

"Currently reading the 1,547-page bill to fund the government through mid-March. Expecting every U.S. congressman and senator to do the same," Ramaswamy posted on Musk's social media platform X late Tuesday. Trump has asked the two billionaires to co-lead the forthcoming Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which they have said will pursue massive cuts to federal regulations and spending.

Musk responded to Ramaswamy early Wednesday, asserting that "this bill should not pass," a sentiment he repeated in several posts throughout the day, as the clock ticked closer to the Friday night deadline set by September legislation.

Ramaswamy also came out against the continuing resolution (CR) Wednesday morning, declaring that a "debt-fueled spending sprees may 'feel good' today, but it's like showering cocaine on an addict." He blasted various provisions, including $100 billion in disaster relief needed after hurricanes as well as funding to renew the Farm Bill for a year, replace the Francis Scott Key Bridge, and raise federal lawmakers' pay.

Donald Trump Jr. then weighed in, taking issue with a provision about subpoenas for U.S. House of Representatives data.

Appearing on "Fox & Friends" Wednesday, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said that he was on a text message thread with Ramaswamy and Musk, claimed that "they understand the situation," and suggested he convinced them that the CR must pass.


However, later Wednesday, the president-elect and Vice President-elect JD Vance—who still represents Ohio in the Senate—released a lengthy statement opposing the CR and calling out specific policies, including the subpoena provision and the pay hike for lawmakers.

Trump and Vance—who are set to take over for Democratic President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris next month—also argued that "the most foolish and inept thing ever done by congressional Republicans was allowing our country to hit the debt ceiling in 2025. It was a mistake and is now something that must be addressed."


"Increasing the debt ceiling is not great but we'd rather do it on Biden's watch," the incoming Republican leaders said. "If Democrats won't cooperate on the debt ceiling now, what makes anyone think they would do it in June during our administration?"

"Republicans want to support our farmers, pay for disaster relief, and set our country up for success in 2025," they claimed. "The only way to do that is with a temporary funding bill WITHOUT DEMOCRAT GIVEAWAYS combined with an increase in the debt ceiling. Anything else is a betrayal of our country."

Trump echoed that point in a series of posts on his platform Truth Social, saying that "if Republicans try to pass a clean Continuing Resolution without all of the Democrat 'bells and whistles' that will be so destructive to our Country, all it will do, after January 20th, is bring the mess of the Debt Limit into the Trump Administration, rather than allowing it to take place in the Biden Administration."


"Any Republican that would be so stupid as to do this should, and will, be Primaried," Trump added. "Everything should be done, and fully negotiated, prior to my taking Office on January 20th, 2025."

Citing unnamed sources familiar with Johnson's thinking, outlets including The Hill and Politico reported Wednesday that the House speaker is now considering trying to pass a "clean" CR that would cut provisions such as disaster aid and economic assistance for farmers.

According toPolitico, "As GOP members streamed into Johnson's office to pick up gifts and stop by an ironically timed Christmas party, they didn't voice enthusiasm for Trump's demands."





White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said in a Wednesday statement that "Republicans need to stop playing politics with this bipartisan agreement or they will hurt hardworking Americans and create instability across the country."

"President-elect Trump and Vice President-elect Vance ordered Republicans to shut down the government and they are threatening to do just that—while undermining communities recovering from disasters, farmers and ranchers, and community health centers," she continued. "Triggering a damaging government shutdown would hurt families who are gathering to meet with their loved ones and endanger the basic services Americans from veterans to Social Security recipients rely on. A deal is a deal. Republicans should keep their word."

Progressive leaders in Congress suggested that Trump's eleventh-hour statements on the CR were guided by his billionaire allies.

"Democrats and Republicans spent months negotiating a bipartisan agreement to fund our government," noted Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). "The richest man on Earth, President Elon Musk, doesn't like it. Will Republicans kiss the ring? Billionaires must not be allowed to run our government."

Also taking aim at Musk, Rep. Maxwell Alejandro Frost (D-Fla.) said that "an unelected billionaire was crowned co-president by the Republican Party. They've given him the influence to make a damn post that throws a spending bill into limbo cause House Republicans are scared of him. No greater example of oligarchy. Where the ultrawealthy run the show."

Outgoing Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair accused House Republicans of "bowing to Elon Musk and pushing us toward a shutdown," which would force active duty service members to work without pay, pause rent and food assistance, and cancel and delay flights right before major holidays.


Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) quipped: "'President-elect' Elon Musk and former President Donald Trump want to shut down the government. Nothing like a couple billionaires wreaking havoc on working families right before the holidays."

Lisa Gilbert, co-president of the watchdog Public Citizen, similarly said that "an unelected billionaire should not be allowed to shut down the government. Musk's temper tantrum this afternoon—and the speed at which Trump fell in line after being cornered—is a terrifying preview of what a Trump-Musk co-presidency will look like."

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) was also critical, saying: "House Republicans have been ordered to shut down the government. And hurt the working-class Americans they claim to support. You break the bipartisan agreement, you own the consequences that follow."


Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) tied the anti-CR push to Republicans' ambitions to pass another round of tax cuts for the superrich.

"Remember what this is all about: Trump wants Democrats to agree to raise the debt ceiling so he can pass his massive corporate and billionaire tax cut without a problem," he said. "Shorter version: tax cut for billionaires or the government shuts down for Christmas."

















Senator slams 'President Elon Musk' for derailing bipartisan spending deal as shutdown looms
December 19, 2024
ALTERNET

Thanks to a bipartisan spending deal, lawmakers in the U.S. House of Representatives appeared to be on track to avoid a federal government shutdown before a Saturday, December 21 deadline.

But the deal ran into problems after Tesla/SpaceX CEO Elon Musk railed against it on X, formerly Twitter. And Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) is slamming House Republicans for being influenced by him.

In a Wednesday, December 18 tweet, Musk — who President-elect Donald Trump has picked to head a new agency that would be called the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) — wrote, "Any member of the House or Senate who votes for this outrageous spending bill deserves to be voted out in 2 years!"

Musk, in a separate tweet, posted, "Please call your elected representatives right away to tell them how you feel! They are trying to get this passed today while no one is paying attention."

Sanders responded with a December 18 tweet of his own, writing, "Democrats and Republicans spent months negotiating a bipartisan agreement to fund our government. The richest man on Earth, President Elon Musk, doesn't like it. Will Republicans kiss the ring? Billionaires must not be allowed to run our government."

The following day on X, Axios' Mike Allen weighed in on Musk's role in sinking the bill.

Allen posted, "A Trump source tells @axios @JimVandeHei & me yesterday's @elonmusk @X storm, which sunk a huge spending bill, is the new playbook: GOP lawmakers got "instant and overwhelming feedback. Before, it had to be slowly funneled through conservative press. Now there is a megaphone."



President Elon? GOP Follows Billionaire Musk’s Call to Block Debt Ceiling Bill

“It’s clear who’s in charge, and it’s not President-elect Donald Trump,” said Washington Rep. Pramila Jayapal.
December 19, 2024
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (right) tries to help Elon Musk (center) to a seat as he arrives with President-elect Donald Trump to a House Republicans Conference meeting at the Hyatt Regency on Capitol Hill on November 13, 2024, in Washington, D.C.Andrew Harnik / Getty Images


Independent journalism like Truthout has been struggling to survive for years – and it’s only going to get harder under Trump’s presidency. If you value progressive media, please make a year-end donation today.

At the behest of billionaire Elon Musk and president-elect Donald Trump, Republicans scrapped a bipartisan agreement to keep the government funded for the next three months on Wednesday, just two days ahead of a deadline for avoiding a shutdown.

Knowing he had to secure some votes from Democrats in the near-evenly split House of Representatives, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) had crafted a continuing resolution that included raising the debt limit until March. Now that the bill has been shot down, it’s unclear whether a shutdown can be averted.

The bill included a number of Democratic Party demands, such as new regulations for health plan administrators, federal funds to rebuild the collapsed bridge in Baltimore, pay raises for members of Congress, and other provisions. The bill also included agreements to raise funding for responses to natural disasters by more than $110 billion, and $10 billion in additional aid to farmers across the U.S.

Upset with the continuing resolution heading for a vote later this week, Musk — who is set to lead the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) within the Trump administration — spent most of Wednesday railing against the bill, publishing more than 100 posts on his social media site X calling for Republicans to oppose it.

Within those posts, Musk wrongly stated that Democrats were calling for a 40 percent increase in pay for lawmakers (when, in fact, the raise would have represented a 3.8 percent increase, the first raise for members of Congress since 2009); falsely claimed that the bill would block Republicans from being able to investigate the work of the January 6 committee; and wrongly asserted that the bill would force taxpayers to pay for a new NFL stadium in Washington, D.C. (The bill merely transfers management of an existing stadium to the district.)

Related Story

DOGE Heads Musk and Ramaswamy Signal Social Security Cuts Are Coming
Trump vowed to “not cut one penny” from Social Security, but his other statements and actions suggest that he plans to.
By Chris Walker , Truthout December 9, 2024


Musk also claimed that the government and the economy would “be fine” if there were to be a shutdown until Trump becomes president on January 20. Past shutdowns showcase how wrong he is — a shutdown crisis during Trump’s first term as president, for example, cost the U.S. economy $11 billion, and a month-long shutdown right now is likely to cost billions of dollars, too.

A lengthy shutdown could also make it harder for people living in the U.S. to access government services. National parks, museums and zoos could temporarily shutter, while other offices could have to shorten hours or close completely. Millions of federal workers would be laid off and others would have to continue working without pay. And while disbursements for Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid would continue, under a shutdown it’s possible that recipients of those benefits could see response delays if there are issues with their payments.

Following Musk’s tirade on X, Trump announced his opposition to the bill later that day, demanding that the entire legislation be renegotiated. “Republicans must GET SMART and TOUGH,” a joint statement from Trump and vice president-elect J.D. Vance read.

Some commentators have noted the timing of Trump’s opposition to the bill.

“Johnson probably wouldn’t be in this position if it weren’t for Musk, who spent all day Wednesday stoking rage on the right over Johnson’s deal. There was little evidence Trump cared much about the [continuing resolution] before that,” read an analysis from Politico’s daily “Playbook.”

That analysis continued:


The most prominent theory of what happened yesterday is this, per multiple Hill Republicans: Musk, as the anointed co-chair of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency panel, got waaay out over his spending-slashing skis and backed Trump into a corner.

Indeed, there are other indications that Trump wasn’t initially opposed to the bill’s passage, as he had privately urged Johnson to pass a continuing resolution right after he was elected president this year, to avoid any drama at the start of his term next month.

Perhaps trying to steer the spotlight back onto himself, Trump has now called for abolishing the debt ceiling, stating in a phone interview with NBC News that doing so would be the “smartest thing [Congress] could do,” and that he would “support that entirely.”

Trump also claimed that the debt ceiling “doesn’t mean anything, except psychologically” — demonstrating a deep lack of understanding regarding what the debt ceiling actually is.

Over the past decade, there have been several calls to eliminate the need to raise the debt ceiling through legislative decree, including by allowing the president to issue an executive order to raise the debt ceiling. But the debt ceiling, which is the amount the federal government is authorized to borrow in debt, would still exist if that were the case.

Ridding the U.S. of the debt ceiling entirely could feasibly lower the credit of the country, as happened after a different debt ceiling crisis in 2011. A significant change in the country’s credit rating could lead to a crisis of its own, in terms of the borrowing power of debt the U.S. could ask for from other countries.

Many Democratic lawmakers condemned Musk for his role in blocking the agreement, questioning who is actually set to be “president” of the next administration.

“You have to ask Donald Trump if Elon Musk is the one making decisions,” Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-New Hampshire) told HuffPost.

“It’s not Donald Trump asking for this. It’s very clearly President Elon Musk asking for this,” Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-New York) said on Bluesky.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) also weighed in on the matter, noting that “the richest man on Earth, President Elon Musk,” was responsible for the bill being killed.

“Billionaires must not be allowed to run our government,” Sanders added.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Washington) echoed that sentiment, calling Musk a “shadow president.”

“It’s clear who’s in charge, and it’s not President-elect Donald Trump,” Jayapal wrote on social media.



'President Musk' Trends After Trump's Top Oligarch Torpedoes Federal Spending Deal

"Welcome to the Elon Musk presidency," wrote Democratic Rep. Robert Garcia.



SpaceX owner and Tesla CEO Elon Musk poses on the red carpet of the Axel Springer Award ceremony  in Berlin, Germany.
(Photo: Britta Pedersen-Pool/Getty Images)


Eloise Goldsmith
Dec 19, 2024
COMMON DREAMS

Congress is careening toward a government shutdown after U.S. President-elect Trump, egged on by billionaire Elon Musk—who helped bankroll Trump's reelection campaign and is slated to help oversee cuts to government spending and regulation in the new administration—torpedoed a federal spending bill that would have kept the government open for the next few months.

The episode has drawn sharp rebuke from Democrats, and caused a number to muse whether it's Musk who's really in charge.

"The U.S. Congress this week came to an agreement to fund our government. Elon Musk, who became $200 BILLION richer since Trump was elected, objected. Are Republicans beholden to the American people? Or President Musk? This is oligarchy at work," wrote Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in a social media post late Wednesday.

During a Wednesday night appearance on MSNBC, Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) called Musk "basically a shadow president."

These sorts of remarks continued Thursday, with Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) writing: "Welcome to the Elon Musk presidency, where Donald Trump is now clearly the vice president. They want a government shutdown that would hurt millions of Americans. It’s totally insane," wrote Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.)

Former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich echoed this sentiment in an opinion piece for Common Dreams published Thursday, writing: "If this isn't oligarchy, I don't know what is. You may not get access to services you depend on just before the holidays because an unelected billionaire shadow president wanted it that way."

[Related: If Musk Blocking a Key Spending Bill Isn’t Oligarchy, I Don’t Know What Is ]

Trump and Vice President-elect JD Vance threw cold water on the spending bill Wednesday afternoon with a joint statement, arguing that the bill included "DEMOCRATIC GIVEAWAYS." The directive from Trump came after Musk spent much of Wednesday airing his opposition to the spending package on the platform X, which he owns. In total, Musk shot off over 150 posts demanding the members of the GOP back away from the spending bill, according to The New York Times.

The bipartisan spending package unveiled by House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Tuesday would have funded the government at current levels through March 14, and also provided some $100 billion for disaster relief as well as $10 billion in economic relief for farmers.

In their statement denouncing the bill, Vance and Trump also called for an increase to the debt ceiling—adding the fraught issue of national debt, which currently stands at more than $36 trillion, into the debate. Trump also called for getting rid of the debt ceiling entirely, according to Thursday reporting from NBC News.

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said this of the debt ceiling demand: "Ha! Trump wants to lift the debt ceiling for one reason and one reason only—so he can borrow shitloads of money to afford his new giant tax break for billionaires and corporations. In other words, saddle regular Americans with mountains more debt so the rich can get richer."


'Delete CFPB': Elon Musk declares war on key regulatory agency


Elon Musk attends the America First Policy Institute (AFPI) gala at Mar-A-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, U.S., November 14, 2024. REUTERS/Carlos Barria

November 28, 2024
ALTERNET

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) came into existence when President Barack Obama signed into law the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. One of the most aggressive proponents of the agency was now-Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), an Obama adviser who argued that aggressive regulation of Wall Street was badly needed in light of the financial crash of September 2008.

In 2010, the United States was still in a deep recession. The Great Recession was the country's worst financial crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s, with the national unemployment rate averaging 9.6 percent that year (according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics).

During its 14-year history, the CFPB has had both defenders and detractors. Some conservatives and libertarians claim that the regulatory agency hobbles the markets; Warren, however, has maintained that the CFPB is a safeguard against devastating financial events like the crashes of 1929 and 2008.

READ MORE:What will Trump and GOP congress do to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau?

In late 2024, the CFPB has a major foe in billionaire Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, SpaceX and X (formerly Twitter). President-elect Donald Trump has picked Musk, along with MAGA businessman Vivek Ramaswamy, to head a proposed government agency that would be called the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)

On November 27, Musk tweeted, "Delete CFPB. There are too many duplicative regulatory agencies."

Forbes' Derek Saul reports, "Musk's post was in response to a recent podcast clip from Marc Andreessen, billionaire venture capitalist and fellow multimillion-dollar Trump donor, who said the CFPB's primary purpose is to 'terrorize financial institutions.' Yahoo Finance reporter Jordan Weissmann notes the CFPB shut down a portfolio company of Andreessen’s firm a16z in 2021."

The CFPB has also been a target of far-right Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation's highly controversial 920-page blueprint for a second Trump Administration. Project 2025 has called for Congress to abolish the agency.


READ MORE: Robert Reich: The last tariff increase 'ended up worsening the Great Depression'

But Warren remains an outspoken defender of the CFPB, recently telling the Washington Post, "The CFPB is here to stay…. There's big talk, but the laws supporting the CFPB are strong."

READ MORE: ''Rocketships to nowhere:' Not everyone on Team Trump is happy with 'co-president' Elon Musk

Read Forbes' full article at this link.
Elon Musk meets with UK far-right leader Nigel Farage


Tech billionaire Elon Musk's meeting with UK far-right firebrand Nigel Farage on Monday is fuelling concerns over a possible donation to the Reform UK party. Musk has already put his fortune and influence at the service of Donald Trump in the US and concerns are growing that he could seek to influence London's ties with Washington.


Issued on: 19/12/2024 
By: NEWS WIRES
FRANCE24

Concerns are growing in the UK that Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk is cosying up to hard-right firebrand UK lawmaker Nigel Farage. © Angela Weiss, AFP


Concerns are growing in the UK as tech billionaire Elon Musk takes an increasingly close interest in Britain's political scene, appearing to cosy up to hard-right firebrand lawmaker Nigel Farage.

With Musk named to a new position in the incoming US administration of Donald Trump, there are fears the world's richest man could seek to influence London's future ties with Washington.

On Wednesday, Farage, who leads the upstart anti-immigration Reform UK party, said he was in talks with Musk about making a donation to his party.

Writing in the Telegraph newspaper, Farage said "the issue of money was discussed" when he met the X owner at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida on Monday.

"There will be ongoing negotiations on that score," the arch-Eurosceptic wrote, in comments that will likely unnerve the ruling Labour party and main Conservative opposition.

Newspaper reports have suggested that Musk is preparing to donate up to $100 million to Reform but Farage told the BBC the pair did not discuss figures.

Musk "described the Labour and Conservative parties as the uniparty, and left us in no doubt that he is right behind us", Farage added.

Farage said they would have to find a way to ensure any donation from Musk was made "legally through UK companies" but the idea which emerged a few weeks ago has already sent shivers down the spines of UK lawmakers.

Reform UK won five seats in the 650-seat UK parliament in July's general election, draining support from both Labour and the Tories.
'Police state'

Farage is already eyeing the next general elections, which have to be held by 2029 at the latest.

Nigel Farage, the leader of Britain's far right party Reform UK, is already eyeing the next UK general elections in 2029. © Benjamin Cremel, AFP

Conservative party co-chairman Dominic Johnson said any such donation by Musk would be "basically buying" one of the UK's political parties.

"People like Elon Musk, like Donald Trump, like Nigel Farage ... the sort of the new right, they really hate the old right" which is seen as having become too liberal, said Russell Foster, senior lecturer in British and International politics at King's College.

This old right "were not killed off by the left or centre. They're killed off because a more right-wing movement comes along".

So far, Musk has contented himself with taking aim at the Labour government of Prime Minister Keir Starmer, launching a series of searing comments on his social network X.

"The people of Britain have had enough of a tyrannical police state," he stormed in November.

At the height of this summer's anti-immigrant riots -- the UK's worst unrest in years -- Musk wrote in X that "civil war is inevitable" and accused the government of dealing with the rioters too harshly.

It won him support among UK social network users and influencers on the far-right.

Musk also advised people in September not to visit the UK when "they're releasing convicted pedophiles in order to imprison people for social media posts".

"He appears to believe that he is on some sort of a mission against the establishment," said Foster.
Pragmatism

Some observers believe Musk is also up in arms about UK government plans to toughen legislation regulating social networks.

Former US president Donald Trump dubbed Nigel Farage 'Mr Brexit'.
 © Andy Wigmore, UKIP, AFP

Starmer said the riots had been fuelled by online content and later did not invite Musk to an investors' conference -- something the SpaceX and Tesla CEO had taken as an insult, sources close to him said.

Since the US presidential elections, Musk and Trump have become inseparable, and their "bromance" could complicate Labour's efforts to boost its ties with the Republicans.

Labour has historically been closer to the Democrats but Starmer, who met Trump in New York in September, has been seeking to open a new chapter in the party's relations with Republicans.

"The prime minister looks forward to working with President Trump and his whole team, including Elon Musk," a Downing Street spokesman said last month.

"Starmer is very aware that he can't alienate the incoming US president," said Foster.

"We think that we have to maintain that special relationship. So it doesn't matter who's in the White House, we're always going to be nice towards Washington."

Labour politician and former cabinet minister Peter Mandelson said it would be "unwise" for the UK to ignore Musk, calling on the Labour party to "swallow your pride."

He described Farage as a "bridgehead, both to President Trump and to Elon Musk and others. You've got to be pragmatic, practical about this".

(AFP)

Musk’s possible meddling in UK politics stirs concern



By AFP
December 18, 2024

Concerns are growing in the UK that Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk is cosying up to hard-right firebrand UK lawmaker Nigel Farage - Copyright AFP ANGELA WEISS
Marie HEUCLIN

Concerns are growing in the UK as tech billionaire Elon Musk takes an increasingly close interest in Britain’s political scene, appearing to cosy up to hard-right firebrand lawmaker Nigel Farage.

With Musk named to a new position in the incoming US administration of Donald Trump, there are fears the world’s richest man could seek to influence London’s future ties with Washington.

On Wednesday, Farage, who leads the upstart anti-immigration Reform UK party, said he was in talks with Musk about making a donation to his party.

Writing in the Telegraph newspaper, Farage said “the issue of money was discussed” when he met the X owner at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida on Monday.

“There will be ongoing negotiations on that score,” the arch-Eurosceptic wrote, in comments that will likely unnerve the ruling Labour party and main Conservative opposition.

Newspaper reports have suggested that Musk is preparing to donate up to $100 million to Reform but Farage told the BBC the pair did not discuss figures.

Musk “described the Labour and Conservative parties as the uniparty, and left us in no doubt that he is right behind us”, Farage added.

Farage said they would have to find a way to ensure any donation from Musk was made “legally through UK companies” but the idea which emerged a few weeks ago has already sent shivers down the spines of UK lawmakers.

Reform UK won five seats in the 650-seat UK parliament in July’s general election, draining support from both Labour and the Tories.

– ‘Police state’ –

Farage is already eyeing the next general elections, which have to be held by 2029 at the latest.

Conservative party co-chairman Dominic Johnson said any such donation by Musk would be “basically buying” one of the UK’s political parties.

“People like Elon Musk, like Donald Trump, like Nigel Farage … the sort of the new right, they really hate the old right” which is seen as having become too liberal, said Russell Foster, senior lecturer in British and International politics at King’s College.

This old right “were not killed off by the left or centre. They’re killed off because a more right-wing movement comes along”.

So far, Musk has contented himself with taking aim at the Labour government of Prime Minister Keir Starmer, launching a series of searing comments on his social network X.

“The people of Britain have had enough of a tyrannical police state,” he stormed in November.

At the height of this summer’s anti-immigrant riots — the UK’s worst unrest in years — Musk wrote in X that “civil war is inevitable” and accused the government of dealing with the rioters too harshly.

It won him support among UK social network users and influencers on the far-right.

Musk also advised people in September not to visit the UK when “they’re releasing convicted pedophiles in order to imprison people for social media posts”.

“He appears to believe that he is on some sort of a mission against the establishment,” said Foster.

– Pragmatism –

Some observers believe Musk is also up in arms about UK government plans to toughen legislation regulating social networks.

Starmer said the riots had been fuelled by online content and later did not invite Musk to an investors’ conference — something the SpaceX and Tesla CEO had taken as an insult, sources close to him said.

Since the US presidential elections, Musk and Trump have become inseparable, and their “bromance” could complicate Labour’s efforts to boost its ties with the Republicans.

Labour has historically been closer to the Democrats but Starmer, who met Trump in New York in September, has been seeking to open a new chapter in the party’s relations with Republicans.

“The prime minister looks forward to working with President Trump and his whole team, including Elon Musk,” a Downing Street spokesman said last month.

“Starmer is very aware that he can’t alienate the incoming US president,” said Foster.

“We think that we have to maintain that special relationship. So it doesn’t matter who’s in the White House, we’re always going to be nice towards Washington.”

Labour politician and former cabinet minister Peter Mandelson said it would be “unwise” for the UK to ignore Musk, calling on the Labour party to “swallow your pride.”

He described Farage as a “bridgehead, both to President Trump and to Elon Musk and others. You’ve got to be pragmatic, practical about this”.
26 people arrested in crackdown on illegal deforestation along Paraguay, Brazil and Argentina border


Trucks wait in line on Friendship Bridge over the Parana River, the border between Foz do Iguazu, Brazil, top, and Ciudad del Este, Paraguay, June 23, 2020. (AP Photo/Jorge Saenz, File)

BY STEVEN GRATTAN
 December 16, 2024Share

BOGOTA, Colombia (AP) — Paraguayan authorities arrested 26 people in a crackdown on suspected illegal deforestation along the country’s border with Brazil and Argentina, Interpol announced Monday.

Fourteen different agencies collaborated in the mid-October sweep, which relied on border inspections, waterway surveillance and aerial monitoring of forests. Some 1,000 logs were seized, including some quebracho wood, prized for its density and high tannin content, Interpol said.

Interpol said 12 companies were involved in the alleged deforestation and trafficking of native tree species, and that it identified two criminal networks. A spokesman said alleged crimes include illegal logging of various tree species, illicit trafficking of timber, use of fake documents to traffic in illegal wood, and various acts of deforestation. He said the delay in announcing the arrests was in part to allow for follow-up investigation.
ADVERTISEMENT


“Illegal deforestation encompasses a broad spectrum of criminal activities, from document fraud to money laundering and corruption,” said Kat Henn, Interpol’s assistant director of environmental security. “This operation highlights the urgent need for continued multi-agency and sustained cross-border cooperation to tackle the criminal networks devastating our environment for profit.”


RELATED STORIES

Organized crime gangs expanded into a third of cities in Brazil’s Amazon, report finds

Brazilian beef and leather companies fall short in tackling deforestation, a study finds

In Brazil, several states with rainforest don't want it protected

Interpol has been boosting its presence in what’s called the Tri-Border area for years. The agency has said the area — with two rivers separating the states and creating many entry points — is “conducive to a wide range of illegal activities.”

Organized crime is increasingly making forested areas their hub of operations — not just for the cover but to illegally extract flora, fauna and mineral resources,” Gimena Sanchez, a human rights advocate at the Washington Office on Latin America, told The Associated Press.

Fighting deforestation in South America “means fighting sophisticated transnational organized crime networks,” she added.

Deforestation typically results from land being converted to raise cattle or soybeans, as well as logging or mining. It leads to a slew of negative environmental impacts, including erosion, biodiversity loss, and increased risk of flooding, as well as the loss of a valuable carbon sink. Though some progress has been made in recent years to slow deforestation, especially in Brazil and Colombia, Latin America lost 138 million hectares (about 341 million acres) of forest between 1990 and 2020, according to a United Nations report.

Gabriel Funari, head of the Amazon Observatory of Illicit Economies for Global Initiative, said they are seeing large transnational criminal groups that have grown through drug trafficking revenue, such as one of Brazil’s largest crime gangs, Primeiro Comando da Capital — commonly known as PCC — increasingly diversifying their investment portfolios into various illicit markets with goods that pass through the Tri-Border, like firearms, timber, wildlife and gold.

In Latin America, the direct environmental harms caused by drug trafficking are much smaller than those from perceived legal industries like cattle ranching and industrial agriculture, says Bram Ebus, a consultant for Crisis Group in Latin America.

“Nevertheless, it is the drug money that is laundered through these economic activities that finances and accelerates deforestation,” he said.
ADVERTISEMENT

___


The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.


STEVEN GRATTAN
Grattan reports on the Amazon rainforest and deforestation around Latin America for The Associated Press. He is based in Bogota, Colombia.

Can U.N. summits save the planet? A faltering year of talks brings up questions about the process

The world’s nations keep faltering in their efforts to join together to save the planet from several environmental crises.

Seth Borenstein and Sibi Arasu
 December 16, 2024
AP

In the past few months United Nations-sponsored negotiations to tackle climate change, plastic pollution, loss of global species and a growing number of deserts have either outright failed or come out with limited outcomes that didn’t address the scale of the problems. It’s been three years since activist Greta Thunberg dismissed global talks as “blah-blah-blah,” which became a rallying cry for young environmentalists.

“If you are not feeling some kind of grief about what’s going on, you’re obviously not understanding what’s going on,” said climate negotiations veteran analyst Alden Meyer of the European think-tank E3G. He said he’s been watching humanity “collectively fail as a species.”



The Associated Press interviewed more than 20 experts and they called multilateral environmentalism broken because of a cumbersome consensus process, the power of the fossil fuel industry, geopolitical changes and the massive size of the problems they are trying to fix.

Progress is being made, especially on climate change, but it’s too little, too slow and in stutter steps, United Nations officials and others said.

“Is it frustrating? Yes. Is it difficult? Yes,” said United Nations Environment Programme Executive Director Inger Andersen. But it is the “only way” in which smaller and poorer nations get a seat at the table with powerful rich countries, she said. “I wouldn’t classify it as an outright failure.”

Failed meetings






It’s a far cry from the hopeful days of 1987 when the world adopted a treaty that is now reversing the dangerous loss of stratospheric ozone by banning certain chemicals. That was followed by a 1992 Earth summit that set up a United Nations system for negotiating environmental problems, especially climate change called Conference of Parties or COPs. A flurry of these conferences in a row fell relatively flat.

The biodiversity COP in Cali, Colombia in October ran out of time, ending with no big agreement except to recognize Indigenous people’s efforts. November’s climate change COP in Baku, Azerbaijan, on paper reached its key goal of increasing financing for poor nations to cope with warming, but the limited amount left developing nations upset and analysts saying it wasn’t nearly enough. A plastics pollution meeting in Busan, South Korea, the next week got many nations saying they wanted to do something, but didn’t in the end. And the conference on desertification in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia also failed to reach an agreement on how to deal with drought.

“We can sum up all these four multilateral meetings of 2024 that we are still failing,” said Johan Rockstrom, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany.

Nine years ago, when more than 190 nations came together to adopt the historic Paris agreement, countries had a mindset that realized a healthy planet benefitted every one, but “we’ve lost track of that,” said former U.N. climate secretary Christiana Figueres, who shepherded that deal. “We’re now entering as though we were gladiators in the Colosseum with an attitude of fighting and confrontation. And that mindset is not very productive.”

A broken system

Panama lead negotiator Juan Carlos Monterrey was part of all four meetings and said the entire system is “fundamentally broken.”

“It feels like we have lost our way, not only as countries and governments, but as humanity. It feels like we no longer care for each other,” Monterrey said from the desert meeting in Riyadh.

Monterrey said he thinks countries like his are going to have to fight environmental problems on their own or with just small groups of nations. Others are embracing the idea of “ climate clubs ” which is a group of countries working together, but not quite the whole world.

“We need to find alternative pathways,” Harjeet Singh, of the Fossil Fuels Non Proliferation Treaty said, pointing to a climate case before the International Court of Justice. Figueres said one group of lawyers has filed 140 climate change-oriented legal actions in courts across the world.

“The U.N. system is the worst system except for all the others. They don’t have another,” former Ireland President Mary Robinson, a member of the advocacy group The Elders, told The Associated Press.

But former U.S. Vice President Al Gore said: “We can’t keep doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.”
Problems with consensus

Thirty years ago when the climate conferences started there was debate over how decisions should be adopted.

A prominent fossil fuel industry lobbyist and Saudi Arabia pushed hard to kill the idea of majority or supermajority vote and instead adopt the idea of consensus so that every country more or less had to be on board, said climate negotiations historian Joanna Depledge at Cambridge University in England.

“Through that they managed to stymie, to weaken the negotiations,” Depledge said.

The nature of consensus is “we end up moving at the pace of the slowest,” said PowerShift Africa’s Mohamed Adow.

Gore, Depledge and others are advocating for new rules to make COP decisions by supermajority rule, not consensus. But past efforts have failed.

“Multilateralism isn’t dead, but it is being held hostage by a very small number of countries trying to prevent progress,” Gore said. “There’s no greater example of this than the way that the fossil fuel industry has hijacked policymaking at all levels.’'

For 27 years, climate negotiations agreements never specifically mentioned “fossil fuels” as the cause of global warming, nor called for their elimination. Then after sharp fights last year in Dubai, it called for a transition away from fossil fuels.
A changing world

Part of the problem is that in the 1980s there were two superpower nations and they had “enough common interest among themselves to knock heads together and to make something happen,” said Princeton University climate scientist and international affairs professor Michael Oppenheimer.

Now, “the world is much more fractured and power is much more diversified,” Depledge said. “Everybody is shouting with their own national circumstances.”

But at the same time, those shouting nations — and businesses and the economy in general — are doing much more at home to fight climate change regardless of what’s done at COPs, Figueres said.

Former top U.S. negotiator Jonathan Pershing, now environment program director at the Hewlett Foundation, points to “the long arc” of enormous progress made. (The Associated Press receives support for climate coverage from Hewlett).

U.N. Climate Secretary Simon Stiell told AP, “Let’s not forget that without U.N.-convened global cooperation, we would be headed for up to 5 degrees Celsius (9 degrees Fahrenheit) of global heating (above pre-industrial levels) — a death sentence for most of humanity.”

All the experts told The AP that they still have hope — either because of or despite what’s happened so far.

“To be hopeless is to give up on the lives of people today,” said climate activist Mitzi Jonelle Tan. “To be hopeless is to give up on my family, on our experiences here. To give up is to give up life.”
__

Read more of AP’s climate coverage at http://www.apnews.com/climate-and-environment
___


The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

SETH BORENSTEIN
Borenstein is an Associated Press science writer, covering climate change, disasters, physics and other science topics. He is based in Washington, D.C.
twitter mailto

SIBI ARASU
Sibi reports on climate change from India and South Asia

Harmful gas billowing from Texas and New Mexico comes mostly from smaller leaks, researchers say


In this photo made with an Optical Gas Imaging thermal camera, a plume of heat from a flare burning off methane and other hydrocarbons is detected in the background next to an oil pumpjack as a cow walks through a field in the Permian Basin in Jal, N.M.
(AP Photo/David Goldman, File)

BY TAMMY WEBBER
December 19, 2024
AP


The blob on the satellite image is a rainbow of colors. An analyst digitally sharpens it and there, highlighted in red, is the source: a concrete oil pad spewing methane.

In the 75,000-square-mile (194-square-kilometer) Permian Basin straddling Texas and New Mexico, the most productive oil and gas region in the world, huge amounts of the powerful greenhouse gas escape from wells, compressor stations and other equipment.

Most efforts to reduce emissions have focused on so-called “super emitters” like the one in the satellite image, which are relatively easy to find with improving satellite imaging and other aerial sensing.

Now researchers say much smaller sources are collectively responsible for about 72% of methane emissions from oil and gas fields throughout the contiguous U.S. These have often gone undetected.

“It’s really (important to) approach the problem from both ends because the high-emitting super emitters are important, but so are the smaller ones,” said James Williams, a post-doctoral science fellow at the Environmental Defense Fund and lead author on a new study that took a comprehensive look at emissions within the nation’s oil and gas basins.

Addressing methane is important because it accounts for about one third of all greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change.

RELATED STORIES

Biden EPA to charge ‘methane fee’ for drilling waste by oil and gas companies



COP29: Shanghai, Tokyo, New York, Houston spew most greenhouse gas of world cities

In new term, Trump to target climate measures that are making the most difference

Tackling methane emissions in the Permian is especially challenging because there are more than 130,000 active well sites owned by everyone from family operators to international conglomerates, experts said. Each site can have multiple oil wells.

“The Permian is in many ways the most complicated basin in the world; it’s incredibly dense there ... with big, small and everything in between,” said Steve Hamburg, chief scientist at the Environmental Defense Fund.

What’s more, pipelines, processing and other activities often are owned by different companies — with tens of thousands of points where methane might escape, either through leaks or intentional venting.

An Israeli company that used satellite data and artificial intelligence to look for leaks in Midland County, Texas, the heart of the Permian Basin, found 50 separate plumes emanating from 16 of 30 sites it monitored. Most were bleeding over 4,500 kilograms of harmful gas per hour and five exceeded 10,000, far above the Environmental Protection Agency’s super emitter threshold of 100 kg/hr.

But the biggest surprise, “was seeing a lot of small emissions in this very crowded place ... so close to each other, so close to an area where people actually live,” said Omer Shenhar, vice president of product at Momentick, which provides satellite-based monitoring to oil and gas companies.

Methane traps over 80 times more heat close to the Earth than carbon dioxide does, ton for ton. What’s more, concentrations have almost tripled since pre-industrial times.

A powerful new satellite called MethaneSAT that launched this year will be able to detect small emissions over wide areas that other satellites can’t. Researchers will also be able to track methane over time in all the world’s major oil-producing basins.

“We’ve never had that,” said the EDF’s Hamburg, who leads the project.

Although the satellite cannot pinpoint those smaller sources, “you don’t need to” because operators on the ground can find the sources, Hamburg said.

In the U.S., oil and gas companies will be required to routinely look for leaks at new and existing sites, including from wells, production facilities and compressor station under a new EPA rule.

The rule also phases out the practice of routinely burning off excess methane, called flaring, and requires upgrading devices that leak methane.

States have until 2026 to develop a plan to implement that rule for existing sources.

Oil and natural gas companies also would have to pay a federal fee per ton of leaked methane above a certain level under a final rule announced last month by the Biden administration, although the incoming Trump administration could eliminate that.

Methane — the primary component of natural gas — is valuable commercially, yet many operators in the Permian regard it as a nuisance byproduct of oil production and flare it because they haven’t built pipelines to carry it to market, Duren and Hamburg said.

Neither the Permian Basin Petroleum Association nor the U.S. Oil & Gas Association responded to requests for comment.

Riley Duren, CEO of the nonprofit Carbon Mapper, who was not involved in the study, said it’s always important to tackle super emitters because they have such an outsize impact. They are often fleeting but not always. Some continue for weeks, months or years.

Everything adds up.

“I think ... what percentage of the total comes from a large number of small sources versus super emitters is less important than what do you do with the information,” said Duren. There are “literally thousands and thousands of pieces of equipment and they can blow a leak at any time.”
___


The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
US Immigration agency deports highest numbers since 2014, aided by more flights


A boy looks through a border wall separating Mexico from the United States, Nov. 26, 2024, in Tijuana, Mexico. (AP Photo/Gregory Bull, File)

BY VALERIE GONZALEZ AND ELLIOT SPAGAT
December 19, 2024

McALLEN, Texas (AP) — U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement deported more than 270,000 people to 192 countries over a recent 12-month period, the highest annual tally in a decade, according to a report released Thursday that illustrates some of the financial and operational challenges that President-elect Donald Trump will face to carry out his pledge of mass deportations.

ICE, the main government agency responsible for removing people in the country illegally, had 271,484 deportations in its fiscal year ended Sept. 30, nearly double from 142,580 in the same period a year earlier.

It was ICE’s highest deportation count since 2014, when it removed 315,943 people. The highest it reached during Trump’s first term in the White House was 267,258 in 2019.

Increased deportation flights, including on weekends, and streamlined travel procedures for people sent to Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador fueled the increase, ICE said. The agency had its first large flight to China in six years and also had planes stop in Albania, Angola, Egypt, Georgia, Ghana, Guinea, India, Mauritania, Romania, Senegal, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.

Mexico was the most common destination for deportees (87,298), followed by Guatemala (66,435) and Honduras (45,923), the report said. Mexico and Central American countries are expected to continue to bear the brunt of deportations, partly because those governments more readily accept their respective citizens than some others and logistics are easier.


Still, ICE’s detention space and staff limited its reach as the number of people it monitors through immigration courts continued to mushroom. The agency’s enforcement and removals unit has remained steady at around 6,000 officers over the last decade while its caseload has roughly quadrupled to about 8 million people.
___

Spagat reported from San Diego.
Cold weather deaths rising among Americans

By Ernie Mundell, HealthDay News
December 19, 2024

An uptick in cold snaps, along with other possible factors, has been linked to a doubling of U.S. deaths from freezing temperatures since 1999, according to new research. 
Photo by Adobe Stock/HealthDay News

It's a perhaps unexpected consequence of climate change that periods of deep cold now occur more frequently during American winters, despite an overall trend to warmer temperatures year round.

That uptick in cold snaps, along with other possible factors, has been linked to a doubling of U.S. deaths from freezing temperatures since 1999, according to new research published Thursday in the Journal of the American Medical Association..

The findings "warrant public health interventions to improve access to warming centers and indoor heating for vulnerable populations," according to research led by Dr. Rishi Wadhera, an associate professor of health policy and management at Harvard University.

In their study, Wadhera's team tracked U.S. death certificates for the over 63.5 million Americans who died between 1999 and 2022. In total, exposure to cold temperatures was listed as a direct or contributing factor in a death in 0.06% of cases over that time span.

However, the rate at which these deaths occurred more than doubled over the 23 years covered by the study: From 0.44 deaths per every 100,000 people in 1999 to 0.92 deaths per 100,000 by 2022.

That worked out to an 3.4% annual increase in cold-related deaths year-by-year since 1999, the Harvard team calculated.


However, the bulk of the change occurred between 2016 and 2022, they noted, which has coincided with accelerations in climate change.

Certain subgroups of Americans are also at high risk of dying from exposure to freezing weather.

The aged are most vulnerable, because they are "more susceptible to cold weather due to limited thermoregulatory [body temperature] response" and often have underlying health conditions that weaken them further, the authors wrote.

American Indian/Alaska Native populations also had much higher odds of dying from cold exposures, as did Black Americans, compared to White Americans, the study found.

That's consistent with people in minority populations too often living in spaces with a "lack of home insulation or heat," Wadhera's group pointed out.

Besides climate change, the researchers also cited a rise in risk factors such as "homelessness, social isolation and substance use" as playing a potential role in the increase in cold-related deaths.

More information

Find out more on how to protect yourself from cold weather at the National Weather Service.

Copyright © 2024 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


Cold-related deaths in the US




JAMA Network




About The Study: Cold-related mortality rates more than doubled in the U.S. between 1999 and 2022. Prior research suggests that cold temperatures account for most temperature-related mortality. This study identified an increase in such deaths over the past 6 years. The underlying drivers of this trend warrant further research and may include more frequent extreme winter weather events and/or the rising burden of risk factors for cold-related mortality such as homelessness, social isolation, and substance use. 

Corresponding Author: To contact the corresponding author, Rishi K. Wadhera, MD, MPP, MPhil, email rwadhera@bidmc.harvard.edu.

To access the embargoed study: Visit our For The Media website at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

(doi:10.1001/jama.2024.25194)

Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

#  #  #

Embed this link to provide your readers free access to the full-text article This link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2024.25194?guestAccessKey=c7859fb9-b0b4-40c8-a442-cce103a0727a&utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_content=tfl&utm_term=121924