Friday, December 20, 2024

Christian Nationalists Are Reshaping Texas’s Public School Curricula

The Texas State Board of Education will pay districts $60 a student to use a curriculum infused with Christian content.
December 15, 2024
A fourth-grade dual language student raises his hand during class in Spanish on October 19, 2023, at Patterson Elementary School in Houston, Texas.
Yi-Chin Lee / Houston Chronicle via Getty Images

When Texas elementary school students return to the classroom next fall, they may be studying from textbooks with messages about patriotism, American exceptionalism and the superiority of the free enterprise system. Some of these textbooks will likely also offer a hefty dose of Christian content, with Bible-infused lessons in their English and language arts classes.

“The flag evokes feelings of pride and respect, reminding us of the freedoms and rights that we cherish as Americans,” one lesson in a State Board of Education- approved textbook begins.

Another lesson, called “Tommy’s Big Dream,” introduces a third grader who hopes to become an entrepreneur. “His favorite class is social studies where he learns about free enterprise,” the textbook states. “This means people in America can open businesses.… Tommy admires local shopkeepers who sell books, toys and treats.… He wants to be like them, using creativity and hard work to succeed. One day, he shares his dream with his teacher who says, ‘In America, you can do anything you set your mind to.’ This makes Tommy feel proud to live in a place where dreams can come true with hard work.”

Some minimize the foundational impact of slavery in the United States, while others celebrate the architectural splendor of Thomas Jefferson’s Monticello plantation without mentioning that enslaved people built it. Similarly, a state-sanctioned 5th-grade textbook cites Abraham Lincoln’s “deep Christian faith” and credits Jim Crow laws with encouraging the development of numerous Black businesses.

Related Story

Inside Christian Nationalists’ Legal Long Game to End Church-State Separation
Christian nationalists have made inroads in Texas with their push to eliminate the separation between church and state.
By Schuyler Mitchell , Truthout November 25, 2024


Others focus on creationism.

And still others ignore climate cha
nge, environmental degradation and the many social movements that shaped the 20th and early 21st centuries.

All told, the approved textbooks include a great deal of questionable content and represents the fruit of a six-and-a-half-decade campaign to change what public school students are taught in Texas and beyond.

The Long Fight for Education Censorship

The story begins in 1961, when Mel and Norma Gabler, Christian fundamentalists from Longview, Texas, created Educational Research Analysts (ERA) to review every textbook used in Texas public schools. The couple were well-versed in the power of organizing and understood that because Texas was — and still is — the second-largest textbook purchaser in the U.S., it had clout. Their initial goals? Making sure that textbooks promoted the teaching of creationism over evolution and showcased the superiority of free enterprise and Christian morality. They also pushed for abstinence-only sex
Christian Nationalists Are Reshaping Texas’s Public School Curricula
The Texas State Board of Education will pay districts $60 a student to use a curriculum infused with Christian content.

By Eleanor J. Bader , Truthout
PublishedDecember 15, 2024
A fourth-grade dual language student raises his hand during class in Spanish on October 19, 2023, at Patterson Elementary School in Houston, Texas.
A fourth-grade dual language student raises his hand during class in Spanish on October 19, 2023, at Patterson Elementary School in Houston, Texas.
Yi-Chin Lee / Houston Chronicle via Getty Images
Independent journalism like Truthout has been struggling to survive for years – and it’s only going to get harder under Trump’s presidency. If you value progressive media, please make a year-end donation today.

When Texas elementary school students return to the classroom next fall, they may be studying from textbooks with messages about patriotism, American exceptionalism and the superiority of the free enterprise system. Some of these textbooks will likely also offer a hefty dose of Christian content, with Bible-infused lessons in their English and language arts classes.

“The flag evokes feelings of pride and respect, reminding us of the freedoms and rights that we cherish as Americans,” one lesson in a State Board of Education- approved textbook begins.

Another lesson, called “Tommy’s Big Dream,” introduces a third grader who hopes to become an entrepreneur. “His favorite class is social studies where he learns about free enterprise,” the textbook states. “This means people in America can open businesses.… Tommy admires local shopkeepers who sell books, toys and treats.… He wants to be like them, using creativity and hard work to succeed. One day, he shares his dream with his teacher who says, ‘In America, you can do anything you set your mind to.’ This makes Tommy feel proud to live in a place where dreams can come true with hard work.”

Get our free emails
Email*
name@email.com
Other textbooks tout different messages.

Some minimize the foundational impact of slavery in the United States, while others celebrate the architectural splendor of Thomas Jefferson’s Monticello plantation without mentioning that enslaved people built it. Similarly, a state-sanctioned 5th-grade textbook cites Abraham Lincoln’s “deep Christian faith” and credits Jim Crow laws with encouraging the development of numerous Black businesses.

Related Story
A parent holds a sign reading "TEACH THE TRUTH" during a board of trustees meeting
News | Education & Youth
Inside Christian Nationalists’ Legal Long Game to End Church-State Separation
Christian nationalists have made inroads in Texas with their push to eliminate the separation between church and state.
By Schuyler Mitchell , TruthoutNovember 25, 2024
Others focus on creationism.

And still others ignore climate change, environmental degradation and the many social movements that shaped the 20th and early 21st centuries.

All told, the approved textbooks include a great deal of questionable content and represents the fruit of a six-and-a-half-decade campaign to change what public school students are taught in Texas and beyond.

The Long Fight for Education Censorship
The story begins in 1961, when Mel and Norma Gabler, Christian fundamentalists from Longview, Texas, created Educational Research Analysts (ERA) to review every textbook used in Texas public schools. The couple were well-versed in the power of organizing and understood that because Texas was — and still is — the second-largest textbook purchaser in the U.S., it had clout. Their initial goals? Making sure that textbooks promoted the teaching of creationism over evolution and showcased the superiority of free enterprise and Christian morality. They also pushed for abstinence-only sex education classes and sought to eradicate what they saw as “liberal bias” in education. The group is now run by Neal and Judy Frey, evangelicals who’ve extended ERA’s agenda to include opposition to marriage equality and trans rights.

A state-sanctioned 5th-grade textbook cites Abraham Lincoln’s “deep Christian faith” and credits Jim Crow laws with encouraging the development of numerous Black businesses.

Slowly but surely, their dogged work has paid off. According to the National Center for Science Education, the Gablers’ first big victory came in 1982, when the Texas State Textbook Committee rejected a top-rated world geography book called Land and People because it said that “biologists believe that human beings, as members of the animal kingdom, have adjusted to their environment through biological adaptation.” Mention of both the Big Bang Theory and the fact that the earth is millions of years old were additional nails in Land and People’s coffin, and the Gablers testified to the committee that “mammals were created, not developed.”

This ball has continued to roll. Zeph Capo, president of the Texas chapter of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), and a former middle and high school biology teacher, told Truthout that some school districts have “removed all mention of environmental change from the curriculum, barring teachers from discussing it even if it is in the news or is being directly experienced.”

In fact, says Kasey Meehan, director of PEN America’s Freedom to Read Project, in May 2024 the Cypress Fairbanks Independent School District in Houston — the third-largest district in the state — removed 13 “controversial” chapters from five science textbooks that covered vaccines, epidemics and climate change.

“This speaks to the narrow ideological viewpoint that is attempting to reshape public education in Texas and throughout the country,” Meehan told Truthout. “For the most part book publishers have mobilized in defense of literature and against book bans more generally, but textbook companies have not publicly reacted to content shifts.”

Perhaps this is because the American Association of Publishers estimates that the textbook industry brings approximately $9 billion a year into the coffers of such industry giants as Cengage Learning, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, McGraw Hill, Pearson and Scholastic.

Legislative Changes Bolster Content Changes
A variety of restrictive measures, passed by the Texas legislature, have reinforced these omissions and distortions of fact.

In 2010, for example, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) standards developed by the State Board of Education mandated that social studies classes inform students that Moses and King Solomon inspired U.S. democracy; that segregated schools did not always lead to inferior instruction for Black children; and that the framers of the Constitution were influenced by ideas generated during the Protestant reformation regarding individual responsibility, freedom to worship and self-governance.

A decade later, in December 2021, the Texas statehouse passed Senate Bill 3. That bill banned the teaching of the 1619 Project (a history of slavery’s impact on the U.S. created by Nikole Hannah-Jones and The New York Times) and critical race theory, and required instruction on American exceptionalism, patriotism, free markets and entrepreneurship in all Texas schools. Then, HB 900, the Restricting Explicit and Adult Designated Educational Resources Act — now partially enjoined — was passed to restrict “sexually explicit” materials from being stocked by school libraries or sold to school districts. It also required students who want to read books deemed “sexually relevant” to get parental permission.

In November 2024, the state board went one further, voting to approve a Bible-infused curriculum for the state’s 2.3 million kindergarten to 5th grade students. Included are lessons about the golden rule and Jesus’s sermon on the mount. The plan was developed by a state-created entity called Bluebonnet Learning, which has deep ties to the evangelical community. According to the education news outlet The74million.org, the Bluebonnet curriculum utilizes materials developed by eSpired, a company co-founded by Christian nationalist and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, Trump’s nominee to become ambassador to Israel. A section on the golden rule, for one, was “lifted wholesale from the covers of the company’s books,” The74Million reports. (Geared mostly to Christian homeschoolers, eSpired’s other titles include The Kid’s Guide to Free Speech and Cancel Culture and The Kid’s Guide to Fighting Socialism, both $21.90.)

Zeph Capo, president of the Texas chapter of the American Federation of Teachers told Truthout that some school districts have “removed all mention of environmental change from the curriculum.

The upshot, Houston TV station KPRL2 noted, is that Christian references appear three times in kindergarten curricula, four times in first grade and 17 times in grade two.

The state board of education has stressed that local school districts do not have to use this curriculum. Nonetheless, those that opt in will receive an extra $60 per student. This “incentive,” says Alejandra Lopez, president of the San Antonio Alliance of Teachers and Support Personnel, Local 67, “puts districts in a difficult position, forcing them to ask themselves if $60 per student is worth blurring the lines between church and state.”

It may be a tough call.

Texas currently spends $9,871 a year on each student enrolled in Texas public schools, an amount that has remained stagnant since 2019; this is far below the $12,612 national per pupil average. Moreover, while a small segment of Texas teachers and school staff are organized, public workers in the Lone Star State are barred from bargaining collectively.

Clay Robison, a spokesperson for the Texas State Teachers Association, an affiliate of the National Education Association, says that this means that while the union can advocate for policies it supports, its 68,000 members are limited in the scope of what they can do.

Robison told Truthout that 60 percent of the 5 million kids enrolled in Texas public schools are economically disadvantaged. “They do not respond well to books that say hard work will lead to success since their experience often tells them something different. They need to learn the truth, which is why we believe teachers should be able to teach history lessons that include the negative parts.”

Similarly, Capo of the AFT told Truthout that teachers are becoming increasingly disheartened by the state’s indoctrination of kids. “We have a code of ethics for educators that says that we will not provide preferential treatment to any group of students. We’re now asking ourselves if the curriculum created by Bluebonnet runs afoul of this by prioritizing Christian students over Jewish, Muslim or nonreligious ones. We’re working to see if this will give us leverage.”

Advocates and educators are using other tactics to push back against the curricular changes as well.

Caro Achar, engagement coordinator at the ACLU of Texas, acknowledges that unions are facing an uphill battle but adds that there is an “active network of people who are fighting for the right to speak out and defend the freedom to learn.” The most important thing for advocates of free speech and religious freedom to do right now, Achar says, is testify at local school board meetings and make their opposition to adoption of the curriculum known before it takes effect next fall. “Parents have the right to support their kids in learning to think critically and study history in an inclusive classroom,” she said. “Students have the right to learn the truth. The $60 per head bounty is a big temptation for districts, but they have to resist. We’re pointing out that losing the ability to think critically will cost more than $60 per student in the long run. Kids who are half-educated cannot thrive.”

They also fail to thrive when they feel their identities are under attack.

Zoe Fasolo, a therapist whose practice includes many adolescents who identify as trans, nonbinary or queer, told Truthout that students can be adversely impacted by discussion of curricular changes. Although she is not based in Texas, she said that, “The number one risk for these kids is suicide, and it is often difficult to keep them safe. People are scared about losing access to hormone replacements once Trump takes office. It’s scary and I have no reassuring words. Even worse, when kids are working hard and still struggling, they conclude that they must be doing something wrong if they are not like little Tommy. They get demoralized.”

“Students have the right to learn the truth. The $60 per head bounty is a big temptation for districts, but they have to resist.”

Teachers Try to Mediate But Often Lack the Resources to Help
Many teachers and school workers, of course, try to be there for their students — but union activists report that many of their colleagues are fearful of reprisals. Some self-censor, knowing that they are walking a hard to navigate line.

“Our legislature meets every two years,” Alejandra Lopez of the San Antonio Alliance of Teachers and Support Personnel told Truthout. During the next session, which begins in January, she expects one of the biggest issues will be universal school vouchers, a benefit that is purportedly meant to give every parent the financial support to send their kids to parochial or private schools but which instead undermines public education. “This is the war Gov. Greg Abbott has been fighting,” she says. “We’re concerned that there may be some trading, getting lawmakers to vote for vouchers in exchange for a per pupil increase in state funding for those who remain in the public schools.”

Unsurprisingly, this is not what most parents want. Ailen Arreaza, director of the national advocacy group Parents Together, told Truthout that, “What we consistently hear from parents is that they want safe, fully funded schools with the resources they need to give their children a clear pathway to work or college when they graduate. They trust teachers and want their kids to be able to make a good life for themselves however they define that. They know that if only one worldview is presented in class, it makes the schools feel unsafe for students who are not part of that group. No one we work with is worried about the lack of Biblical instruction in their child’s classroom.”

Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One
Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.

Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.

Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.

As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.

And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.

In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.

We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.

We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $140,000 in one-time donations and to add 1469 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.

Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.

If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!

With gratitude and resolve,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy



This article is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), and you are free to share and republish under the terms of the license.

Eleanor Bader
Eleanor J. Bader
Eleanor J. Bader is an award-winning journalist who writes about domestic social issues, movements for social change, books and art. In addition to Truthout, she writes for The Progressive, Lilith Magazine and blog, the LA Review of Books, Rain Taxi, The Indypendent and other online and print publications.

Share
Share via Facebook
Share via Bluesky
Share via Flipboard
Share via Mail
Share via Print
More
…Reading List
Education & Youth
Christian Nationalists Are Reshaping Texas’s Public School Curricula
The Global South Is on the Brink of a Disastrous Debt Crisis. Reform Is Urgent.
Environment & Health
It’s Not Just Denied Claims. Insurance Firms Are Hiring Middlemen to Deny Meds.
Culture & Media
Without Transformative Local Media, Our Communities Are Vulnerable
Reproductive Rights
Don’t Panic: Organizers Weigh In on Defending Reproductive Justice From the GOP
Environment & Health
Millions of Taxpayer Dollars Have Subsidized Project 2025 and Climate Denial
Related Stories education classes and sought to eradicate what they saw as “liberal bias” in education. The group is now run by Neal and Judy Frey, evangelicals who’ve extended ERA’s agenda to include opposition to marriage equality and trans rights.


A state-sanctioned 5th-grade textbook cites Abraham Lincoln’s “deep Christian faith” and credits Jim Crow laws with encouraging the development of numerous Black businesses.

Slowly but surely, their dogged work has paid off. According to the National Center for Science Education, the Gablers’ first big victory came in 1982, when the Texas State Textbook Committee rejected a top-rated world geography book called Land and People because it said that “biologists believe that human beings, as members of the animal kingdom, have adjusted to their environment through biological adaptation.” Mention of both the Big Bang Theory and the fact that the earth is millions of years old were additional nails in Land and People’s coffin, and the Gablers testified to the committee that “mammals were created, not developed.”

This ball has continued to roll. Zeph Capo, president of the Texas chapter of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), and a former middle and high school biology teacher, told Truthout that some school districts have “removed all mention of environmental change from the curriculum, barring teachers from discussing it even if it is in the news or is being directly experienced.”

In fact, says Kasey Meehan, director of PEN America’s Freedom to Read Project, in May 2024 the Cypress Fairbanks Independent School District in Houston — the third-largest district in the state — removed 13 “controversial” chapters from five science textbooks that covered vaccines, epidemics and climate change.

“This speaks to the narrow ideological viewpoint that is attempting to reshape public education in Texas and throughout the country,” Meehan told Truthout. “For the most part book publishers have mobilized in defense of literature and against book bans more generally, but textbook companies have not publicly reacted to content shifts.”

Perhaps this is because the American Association of Publishers estimates that the textbook industry brings approximately $9 billion a year into the coffers of such industry giants as Cengage Learning, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, McGraw Hill, Pearson and Scholastic.
Legislative Changes Bolster Content Changes

A variety of restrictive measures, passed by the Texas legislature, have reinforced these omissions and distortions of fact.

In 2010, for example, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) standards developed by the State Board of Education mandated that social studies classes inform students that Moses and King Solomon inspired U.S. democracy; that segregated schools did not always lead to inferior instruction for Black children; and that the framers of the Constitution were influenced by ideas generated during the Protestant reformation regarding individual responsibility, freedom to worship and self-governance.

A decade later, in December 2021, the Texas statehouse passed Senate Bill 3. That bill banned the teaching of the 1619 Project (a history of slavery’s impact on the U.S. created by Nikole Hannah-Jones and The New York Times) and critical race theory, and required instruction on American exceptionalism, patriotism, free markets and entrepreneurship in all Texas schools. Then, HB 900, the Restricting Explicit and Adult Designated Educational Resources Act — now partially enjoined — was passed to restrict “sexually explicit” materials from being stocked by school libraries or sold to school districts. It also required students who want to read books deemed “sexually relevant” to get parental permission.

In November 2024, the state board went one further, voting to approve a Bible-infused curriculum for the state’s 2.3 million kindergarten to 5th grade students. Included are lessons about the golden rule and Jesus’s sermon on the mount. The plan was developed by a state-created entity called Bluebonnet Learning, which has deep ties to the evangelical community. According to the education news outlet The74million.org, the Bluebonnet curriculum utilizes materials developed by eSpired, a company co-founded by Christian nationalist and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, Trump’s nominee to become ambassador to Israel. A section on the golden rule, for one, was “lifted wholesale from the covers of the company’s books,” The74Million reports. (Geared mostly to Christian homeschoolers, eSpired’s other titles include The Kid’s Guide to Free Speech and Cancel Culture and The Kid’s Guide to Fighting Socialism, both $21.90.)


Zeph Capo, president of the Texas chapter of the American Federation of Teachers told Truthout that some school districts have “removed all mention of environmental change from the curriculum.

The upshot, Houston TV station KPRL2 noted, is that Christian references appear three times in kindergarten curricula, four times in first grade and 17 times in grade two.

The state board of education has stressed that local school districts do not have to use this curriculum. Nonetheless, those that opt in will receive an extra $60 per student. This “incentive,” says Alejandra Lopez, president of the San Antonio Alliance of Teachers and Support Personnel, Local 67, “puts districts in a difficult position, forcing them to ask themselves if $60 per student is worth blurring the lines between church and state.”

It may be a tough call.

Texas currently spends $9,871 a year on each student enrolled in Texas public schools, an amount that has remained stagnant since 2019; this is far below the $12,612 national per pupil average. Moreover, while a small segment of Texas teachers and school staff are organized, public workers in the Lone Star State are barred from bargaining collectively.

Clay Robison, a spokesperson for the Texas State Teachers Association, an affiliate of the National Education Association, says that this means that while the union can advocate for policies it supports, its 68,000 members are limited in the scope of what they can do.

Robison told Truthout that 60 percent of the 5 million kids enrolled in Texas public schools are economically disadvantaged. “They do not respond well to books that say hard work will lead to success since their experience often tells them something different. They need to learn the truth, which is why we believe teachers should be able to teach history lessons that include the negative parts.”

Similarly, Capo of the AFT told Truthout that teachers are becoming increasingly disheartened by the state’s indoctrination of kids. “We have a code of ethics for educators that says that we will not provide preferential treatment to any group of students. We’re now asking ourselves if the curriculum created by Bluebonnet runs afoul of this by prioritizing Christian students over Jewish, Muslim or nonreligious ones. We’re working to see if this will give us leverage.”

Advocates and educators are using other tactics to push back against the curricular changes as well.

Caro Achar, engagement coordinator at the ACLU of Texas, acknowledges that unions are facing an uphill battle but adds that there is an “active network of people who are fighting for the right to speak out and defend the freedom to learn.” The most important thing for advocates of free speech and religious freedom to do right now, Achar says, is testify at local school board meetings and make their opposition to adoption of the curriculum known before it takes effect next fall. “Parents have the right to support their kids in learning to think critically and study history in an inclusive classroom,” she said. “Students have the right to learn the truth. The $60 per head bounty is a big temptation for districts, but they have to resist. We’re pointing out that losing the ability to think critically will cost more than $60 per student in the long run. Kids who are half-educated cannot thrive.”

They also fail to thrive when they feel their identities are under attack.

Zoe Fasolo, a therapist whose practice includes many adolescents who identify as trans, nonbinary or queer, told Truthout that students can be adversely impacted by discussion of curricular changes. Although she is not based in Texas, she said that, “The number one risk for these kids is suicide, and it is often difficult to keep them safe. People are scared about losing access to hormone replacements once Trump takes office. It’s scary and I have no reassuring words. Even worse, when kids are working hard and still struggling, they conclude that they must be doing something wrong if they are not like little Tommy. They get demoralized.”


“Students have the right to learn the truth. The $60 per head bounty is a big temptation for districts, but they have to resist.”
Teachers Try to Mediate But Often Lack the Resources to Help

Many teachers and school workers, of course, try to be there for their students — but union activists report that many of their colleagues are fearful of reprisals. Some self-censor, knowing that they are walking a hard to navigate line.

“Our legislature meets every two years,” Alejandra Lopez of the San Antonio Alliance of Teachers and Support Personnel told Truthout. During the next session, which begins in January, she expects one of the biggest issues will be universal school vouchers, a benefit that is purportedly meant to give every parent the financial support to send their kids to parochial or private schools but which instead undermines public education. “This is the war Gov. Greg Abbott has been fighting,” she says. “We’re concerned that there may be some trading, getting lawmakers to vote for vouchers in exchange for a per pupil increase in state funding for those who remain in the public schools.”

Unsurprisingly, this is not what most parents want. Ailen Arreaza, director of the national advocacy group Parents Together, told Truthout that, “What we consistently hear from parents is that they want safe, fully funded schools with the resources they need to give their children a clear pathway to work or college when they graduate. They trust teachers and want their kids to be able to make a good life for themselves however they define that. They know that if only one worldview is presented in class, it makes the schools feel unsafe for students who are not part of that group. No one we work with is worried about the lack of Biblical instruction in their child’s classroom.”

This article is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), and you are free to share and republish under the terms of the license.


Eleanor J. Bader is an award-winning journalist who writes about domestic social issues, movements for social change, books and art. In addition to Truthout, she writes for The Progressive, Lilith Magazine and blog, the LA Review of Books, Rain Taxi, The Indypendent and other online and print publications.


































Sexism is a risk factor for memory decline among women




Columbia University Irving Medical Center




NEW YORK, NY (Dec. 18, 2024)--Women born in the most sexist U.S. states experience faster memory decline in later years compared to women born in the least sexist states, a new study by researchers at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons has found.  

The difference between being born in the most versus the least sexist state was equivalent to nine years of cognitive aging. 

The study is one of a growing number of studies that have investigated links between structural sexism and health. Structural sexism, like structural racism, does not refer to personal incidences but to inequality in resources and power that stem from social policies and societal norms. Hate crimes or slurs are individual acts of racism or sexism; unfair lending practices and underrepresentation in government are structural. Previous studies have found that exposure to greater structural sexism in adulthood is associated with higher mortality rates, increased risk of chronic health conditions, and less accessible and affordable health care for women. 

The new study, the first to look at structural sexism and cognitive health, found that memory performance among women age 65 and over declined faster in those born in U.S. states with greater structural sexism compared to those born in states with less structural sexism. The study calculated each state’s level of structural sexism during the decades the women were born based on male-to-female ratios in the labor force, the number of females in state legislatures, poverty rates, and other factors. The researchers then looked at relationships between structural sexism levels and memory performance among 21,000 people in the Washington Heights-Inwood Columbia Aging Project and the Health and Retirement Study

The study also found that the association between structural sexism and memory performance was highest among Black women. “It is likely that, for women racialized as Black, the intersectional impact of sexism and racism creates a unique form of oppression that has greater salience for cognitive health than sexism or racism alone,” says Jennifer Manly, professor of neuropsychology, senior author of the study. 

“Our findings suggest that addressing social inequities may be a powerful way to lower the burden of Alzheimer’s among women,” says study leader Justina Avila-Rieger, an associate research scientist in the Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center Columbia, whose studies focus on sex, gender, racial, and ethnic disparities in Alzheimer’s disease. “Alzheimer’s is a huge societal problem, particularly among women, who account for two-thirds of Americans with the disease. It’s imperative that we gain a better understanding of what is causing this discrepancy and what can be done about it.” 

Studies of why Alzheimer’s disease affects women more than men have largely focused on sex-linked biological differences, such as hormones and genes. The new study suggests that one of the most important and underappreciated risk factors may be systemic sex and gender discrimination. 

How structural sexism contributes to memory decline is not clear. “What we do know is structural inequalities shape individual health outcomes by creating barriers to health-enhancing opportunities and resources,” says Avila-Rieger. “Eventually, these exposures produce disparities in chronic physical health conditions that directly influence brain health, the onset of cognitive impairment and, ultimately, dementia.” 

In future studies, Avila-Reiger plans to look at the effects of exposure to structural sexism at different stages of life. “It’s possible that early life exposure may be a critical period for structural inequality, with direct or indirect consequences that accumulate over time,” she says. “We also need to tease apart which aspects of structural sexism have the most impact on cognitive health. This is important in terms of making recommendations to policy makers.” 

Additional information

The study, “Early Life Exposure to Structural Sexism and Late-Life Memory Trajectories Among Black and White Women and Men in the U.S.,” was published online December 18 in Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association. 

All contributors (from Columbia unless noted): Justina Avila-Reiger, Paris B. Adkins-Jackson, Tanisha G. Hill-Jarrett (University of California San Francisco and Trinity College, Ireland), Whitney R. Robinson (Duke University), Katherine M. Keyes, Nicole Schupf, Adam M. Brickman, Richard P. Mayeux, and Jennifer Manly.  

###

Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC) is a clinical, research, and educational campus located in New York City. Founded in 1928, CUIMC was one of the first academic medical centers established in the United States of America. CUIMC is home to four professional colleges and schools that provide global leadership in scientific research, health and medical education, and patient care including the Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, the Mailman School of Public Health, the College of Dental Medicine, the School of Nursing. For more information, please visit cuimc.columbia.edu

  

 

Hybrid plastic scintillators aim to improve nuclear safety and medical imaging



Advancements in radiation detection: New plastic scintillators are safer, stronger, and clearer




Nuclear Science and Techniques

Schematic diagram of plastic scintillator detecting the incoming particles (neutrons, gamma-rays,  etc.). 

image: 

Plastic scintillators are good alternatives for liquids, single crystals used in fields of nuclear safety, border security for neutron detection in the presence of a gamma radiation background,  as they are more robust and inexpensive without handling safety and field operation that can be produced in varieties of sizes and shapes. The incoming radiation particles causes the organic scintillator fluorescence containing a short decay (prompt) and a long decay (delayed) components, where the slow component is determined by a bimolecular process of the triplet (T1) excitons triplet–triplet interaction and annihilation (TTA) showing dependence on the particle species. The fluorescence photons from the scintillator are collected by a photoelectric conversion device (SiPM, PMT etc.) and are recorded using a digitized pulse to integrate the slow (Qtail) and total (Qtotal) components in order to discriminate radiation particles.

view more 

Credit: Yingdu Liu




Main text:
Researchers from Xiangtan University and the China Institute of Atomic Energy have developed a new type of plastic scintillator that demonstrates enhanced optical transparency and mechanical durability. These materials offer a safer, more cost-effective alternative to traditional radiation detectors and may impact sectors such as nuclear safety, homeland security, and medical imaging.

Safer & More Cost-Effective Radiation Detection

Radiation detectors are widely used in nuclear power, border security, and medical diagnostics. Traditional detectors, however, often face challenges related to cost, fragility, and reliance on hazardous materials. The newly developed hybrid plastic scintillators address these issues by offering improvements in optical clarity and mechanical strength. This could lead to the development of next-generation radiation detectors that are more durable and efficient to manufacture.

“This development demonstrates the potential for creating next-generation radiation detectors that are both durable and clear,” said Prof. Ying-Du Liu, the corresponding author. “We hope this advancement will inform future research and industry practices.”

Prominent Advancements for Industry and Society

Industries relying on radiation detection could see cost reductions due to simpler production processes and longer material lifespan. The research may also encourage further studies on hybrid polymer materials, potentially benefiting applications in optical sensors, wearable biomedical devices, and other fields.

This advancement is relevant given current global concerns about nuclear safety, healthcare costs, and the need for efficient radiation detection systems. The hybrid scintillators offer a potential solution to several of these challenges.

Innovative Material Design Leads to New Capabilities

The research team’s analysis revealed several significant findings regarding plastic scintillators’ clarity, strength, and overall performance. Adding polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) to polystyrene-based scintillators increased visible light transmissivity to 90%, facilitating more precise and clear radiation detection. The inclusion of PMMA also enhanced the mechanical hardness of the scintillators by up to 55%, improving resistance to wear, impact, and environmental stress. An optimal composition was identified with a 20% PMMA blend, which provided a balance of clarity, mechanical strength, and detection accuracy. While higher PMMA concentrations reduced light output, the 20% blend maintained strong performance and stability over time.

This research outlines a potential path toward safer, more durable, and more cost-effective radiation detectors. By enhancing optical clarity and mechanical strength while maintaining detection performance, the hybrid plastic scintillators may influence the future of radiation detection technologies. As global demand for improved radiation detection increases, these materials offer a promising solution for several critical industries.  The complete study is accessible via DOI: 10.1007/s41365-024-01577-0.

Suboptimal reporting of randomized controlled trials on non-pharmacological therapies in Chinese medicine




Higher Education Press
Fig 1 

image: 

Fig 1

view more 

Credit: Xuan Zhang, Han Li, Hanzhi Tan, Nana Wang, Chung Wah Cheng, Juan Wang, Dongni Shi, Lin Zhang, Yumeng Liu, Yao Wang, Shufeng Luo, Yaxin Lin, Lihan Hu, Xuanqi Zhang, Ji Li, Fei Han, Ping Wang, Aiping Lyu, Zhaoxiang Bian





Nonpharmacological treatments in Chinese medicine (NPTCM), including acupuncture, cupping, moxibustion, and Tuina, have gained global recognition for their efficacy in various health conditions. However, the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on these interventions has been suboptimal, with many lacking sufficient descriptions of interventions, blinding details, and exhibiting significant interstudy heterogeneity. This has led to the development of CONSORT extension guidelines, including STRICTA for acupuncture, STRICTOM for moxibustion, STRICTOC for cupping, and STRICTOTM for Tuina/massage, aiming to standardize the reporting of NPTCM trials. Despite these guidelines, adherence has been variable, with significant room for improvement in the reporting quality of RCTs, particularly in the areas of treatment regimens, practitioner background, and safety assessments.

This review analyzed RCTs published in 2022 to assess the reporting quality of NPTCM interventions based on the respective CONSORT extensions. A total of 387 eligible RCTs were identified, with the majority published in Chinese journals. The review revealed that while acupuncture trials had the highest reporting rate at 62.6%, Tuina/massage trials had the lowest at 47.9%. The reporting of treatment regimens was relatively high at 79.9%, but the reporting of practitioner background was alarmingly low at 14.9%. Subgroup analysis showed that publications in English had a significantly higher reporting score than those in Chinese. The review also identified major deficiencies in the reporting of safety assessments, the incorporation of CM patterns in trial design, and the implementation of blinding in NPTCM trials.

The review highlights the need for enhanced reporting of safety assessments, standardized reporting of CM pattern-related diagnostic criteria and outcomes, and more research into the reasons for poor reporting of certain items such as treatment environment and provider background information. It recommends that journals strengthen their endorsement of reporting guidelines, particularly for Chinese journals, to improve the quality of NPTCM interventional studies. The review concludes that while progress has been made in adhering to reporting guidelines, there is a pressing need for further improvement to ensure accurate documentation and enhance the quality and reliability of research in the field of NPTCM.

 

Graz University of Technology develops modular timber high-rise building for resource-efficient construction



Repairable and exchangeable skeleton modules with open load-bearing structures enable different types of use and uncomplicated adaptations in the event of future changes. Building heights of up to 24 storeys are possible.



Graz University of Technology

The modules can be installed on top of or next to each other, can be changed individually and offer a flexible floor plan. 

image: 

The modules can be installed on top of or next to each other, can be changed individually and offer a flexible floor plan.

view more 

Credit: IAT - TU Graz




The operating life and life span of buildings are often far apart. If a property is no longer fit for purpose, it is usually demolished even though it would still be perfectly usable. Even in the event of damage to individual parts of the building, the entire building usually has to make way. This is because in most cases it is cheaper to build a new building than to carry out a conversion or renovation of the existing one. However, this approach does not conserve resources. In the MOHOHO project, an interdisciplinary team from the Institute of Architectural Technology and the Institute of Timber Engineering and Wood Technology at Graz University of Technology (TU Graz), together with corporate partners Kaufmann Bausysteme and KS Ingenieure, have developed a system for a modular wooden high-rise building, which is designed with the purpose of extending its operating life and life span thanks to its flexible adaptability. A patent application has been applied for this system. The Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) has funded the project.

Circularity

“The construction industry is responsible for around 60 % of global resource consumption and almost half of global waste production and global emissions of climate-damaging gases,” says Christian Keuschnig from the Institute of Architectural Technology at TU Graz. “That’s why the circular R-strategies, such as refurbishment, repair or re-use, were very important for us in the MOHOHO project in order to develop a building system that offers a CO2-reduced alternative to conventional construction methods in high-rise construction and can be used for different purposes for as long as possible.”

This was achieved by combining modular and skeleton construction. In modular construction, completely prefabricated 3D timber modules are used, which are stacked next to and on top of each other. The skeleton construction offers a supporting structure for free and therefore flexible floor plans that can be adapted by inserting or removing partition walls. These recyclable skeleton modules consist of cross-laminated timber floors and glulam columns and beams. The prefabricated skeleton modules can be joined quickly and securely using the connection node developed as part of the project. The connection node also enables load redistribution, which means that the failure of individual columns does not lead to the collapse of the entire building. This firstly increases robustness and thus safety, and secondly enables the targeted repair of individual modules. In addition, an elastomer bearing integrated into the node ensures a high level of sound insulation between the units.

Repairable support structure

To replace a module or individual elements, it is necessary to disconnect the supply lines for electricity, water and heating and expose the connections. The node is designed so that a lifting cylinder can be inserted between the spacers, which slightly lifts the support above. This allows the spacers to be removed and a shear plate redirects the forces after the lifting cylinder has been lowered. This relieves the pressure on the underlying components and creates the necessary space for the replacement process. In addition to accessibility, the individual elements must be able to be dismantled to ensure a repairable construction. In mathematical terms, a building with this construction system can be up to 24 storeys high, although from a height of more than six storeys a concrete core is absolutely essential, something which significantly increases the consumption of resources and CO2 emissions.

“In MOHOHO, we have combined the advantages of modular wood construction, such as the high degree of prefabrication and the short construction time, with the advantages of skeleton construction,” says Christian Keuschnig. “The prefabrication of the modules in a production hall under controlled conditions enables higher quality and traceability of the joints compared to on-site assembly and ensures shorter construction times as well as reduced noise and dirt pollution. The repairability and flexibility of the construction system should significantly extend the operating life and life span of the building. During dismantling, the modules can either be reused directly or separated by type. We are already planning a follow-up project in which we want to test and scrutinise all of these things in practice.”

The modules are joined on top of or next to each other at the connection node.

The connection node compensates for the absence of a module.

Credit

Ingo Candussi