University of Oregon scientists advance a greener way to produce iron
If scaled up, the process could help cut carbon emissions in the steel industry
image:
Postdoc Ana Konovalova shows off the electrochemical cell designed in Paul Kempler’s lab.
view moreCredit: University of Oregon
University of Oregon chemists are bringing a greener way to make iron metal for steel production closer to reality, a step towards cleaning up an industry that’s one of the biggest contributors to carbon emissions worldwide.
Last year UO chemist Paul Kempler and his team reported a way to create iron with electrochemistry, using a series of chemical reactions that turn saltwater and iron oxide into pure iron metal.
In their latest work, they’ve optimized the starting materials for the process, identifying which kinds of iron oxides will make the chemical reactions the most cost-effective. That’s a key to making the process work at an industrial scale.
“We actually have a chemical principle, a sort of guiding design rule, that will teach us how to identify low-cost iron oxides that we could use in these reactors,” Kempler said.
The research was published April 9 in ACS Energy Letters.
Almost 2 billion metric tons of steel were produced worldwide in 2024, used in everything from buildings to cars to infrastructure. Currently, the most fossil fuel-intensive part of that process is turning iron ore — the oxidized form of iron that’s found in nature — into pure iron metal.
Traditionally done in blast furnaces that send carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, Kempler’s team is developing a different approach to iron production.
Their process starts with saltwater and iron oxide, which are cheap and available, and transforms them into iron metal through a series of chemical reactions. Those reactions conveniently also produce chlorine, a commercially valuable byproduct.
When Kempler and his team began developing their process a few years ago, they started with small quantities of iron oxides from chemical supply companies.
Those materials worked well in lab tests. But they didn’t reflect the kind of iron-rich materials found naturally, which have much more variation in composition and structure.
“So then a very natural next question was: What happens if you actually try to work with something which was dug out from the earth directly, without being extra purified, extra milled, and so on?” said Ana Konovalova, who co-led the project as a postdoctoral researcher in Kempler’s lab.
As the team experimented with different kinds of iron oxides, it was clear that some worked much better than others. But the researchers weren’t sure what was driving the difference in the amount of iron metal they could generate from different starting materials. Was it the size of the iron oxide particles? The composition of the material? The presence or absence of specific impurities?
Konovalova and graduate student Andrew Goldman found creative ways to test certain variables while keeping others the same.
For example, they took iron oxide powder and made it into nanoparticles. They put some of the nanoparticles through a heat treatment that made them much denser and less porous.
“It solidifies into this same secondary nanoparticle shape, but there are no more primary particles observed inside. It’s essentially the same material, just in different stages,” Konovalova said.
In lab tests, the difference was striking: “With the really porous particles, we can make iron really quickly on a small area,” Goldman said. “The dense particles just can't achieve the same rate, so we’re limited in how much iron we can make per square meter of electrodes.”
That’s a key insight for making the process work at an industrial scale, where success often comes down to economics.
Large-scale electrochemical plants are expensive to build, and that cost scales with electrode area. To make it economically viable, the electrodes need to be able to generate enough product quickly enough to pay off the initial investment. The faster rate of reaction of the porous particles means the initial capital cost can be recouped faster, translating into a lower final cost for the iron product, ideally low enough to be competitive with conventional methods.
The takeaway isn’t that these specific nanoparticles are needed to make the electrochemical process work well, Kempler said. Rather, the study suggests that the surface area of the starting materials really matters. The porous nanoparticles had much more surface area for the reaction to take place, making the reaction run faster. Other iron oxides with a porous structure could also be cost-effective.
“The goal is to find something that's abundant, cheap and that’s going to have a smaller environmental impact than the alternative,” Kempler said. “We won't be satisfied if we invent something that’s more damaging than the main way that we make iron today.”
To take their process beyond the lab, Kempler’s lab is working with researchers in other fields. A collaboration with civil engineers at Oregon State University is helping them better understand what’s needed for the product to work in real-world applications. And collaboration with an electrode manufacturing company is helping them address the logistical and scientific challenges of scaling up an electrochemical process.
“I think what this work shows is that technology can meet the needs of an industrial society without being environmentally devastating,” Goldman said. “We haven't solved all the problems yet, of course, but I think it's an example that serves as a nucleation point for a different way of thinking about what solutions look like. We can continue to have industry and technology and medicine, and we can do it in a way that’s clean — and that’s awesome!”
— By Laurel Hamers, University Communications
This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy.
Journal
ACS Energy Letters
Article Publication Date
9-Apr-2025
A step toward cleaner iron extraction using electricity
image:
It’s the shape and porosity, not the size, of metal oxide particles that matter for efficiency in electrochemical ironmaking.
view moreCredit: Adapted from ACS Energy Letters 2025, DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.5c00166
Iron and its alloys, such as steel and cast iron, dominate the modern world, and there’s growing demand for iron-derived products. Traditionally, blast furnaces transform iron ore into purified elemental metal, but the process requires a lot of energy and emits air pollution. Now, researchers in ACS Energy Letters report that they’ve developed a cleaner method to extract iron from a synthetic iron ore using electrochemistry, which they say could become cost-competitive with blast furnaces.
"Identifying oxides which can be converted to iron metal at low temperatures is an important step in developing fully electrified processes for steelmaking," says Paul Kempler, the study’s corresponding author.
Electrochemical ironmaking isolates the metal by passing electricity through a liquid that holds iron-containing feedstocks. Compared to high-temperature blast furnaces, the electrochemical process could significantly reduce air pollution emissions, such as greenhouse gases, sulfur dioxide and particulate matter, and suggests considerable energy savings. Previously, Kempler and colleagues used this process to convert solutions containing solid iron(III) oxide particles and sodium hydroxide directly into elemental iron at temperatures around 176 to 194 degrees Fahrenheit (80 to 90 degrees Celsius). However, when some natural iron ores with irregularly sized, dense particles and impurities were tested, this low-temperature process wasn’t selective enough. So, Kempler and a new team of researchers led by Anastasiia Konovalova and Andrew Goldman wanted to understand which iron ore-like feedstocks could support scalable growth of the process.
First, the researchers prepared high surface area iron oxide particles with internal holes and connective cavities to investigate how the nanoscale morphology of the particles impacted the electrochemical reaction. Then, they converted some of these into micrometer-wide iron oxide particles to mimic the morphology of natural ores. These particles contained only a few trace impurities, such as carbon and barium. The team designed a specialized cathode to pull iron metal from a sodium hydroxide solution containing the iron oxide particles as current passed through it. In experiments, dense iron oxides were reduced, or converted into elemental iron, most selectively at a current density of 50 milliamperes per square centimeter, similar to rapidly charging lithium-ion batteries. Conversely, loose particles with higher porosity, and thus higher surface area, facilitated more efficient electrochemical iron production, as compared to those made to resemble the less porous natural iron ore hematite.
The researchers evaluated the potential cost of their electrochemical ironmaking method. At the current density used in the experiments, they estimated that iron could be produced at less than $600 per metric ton ($0.60 per kilogram), which is comparable to traditional ironmaking. The study showed that much higher current densities, up to 600 milliamperes per square centimeter, similar to those used in industrial electrolysis cells, could be achieved when using particles with nanoscale porosity. Further advances in electrochemical cell design and techniques to make iron oxide feedstocks more porous will be required before the technology sees commercial adoption.
The authors acknowledge funding from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences.
The paper’s abstract will be available on April 9 at 8 a.m. Eastern time here: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acsenergylett.5c00166
###
The American Chemical Society (ACS) is a nonprofit organization founded in 1876 and chartered by the U.S. Congress. ACS is committed to improving all lives through the transforming power of chemistry. Its mission is to advance scientific knowledge, empower a global community and champion scientific integrity, and its vision is a world built on science. The Society is a global leader in promoting excellence in science education and providing access to chemistry-related information and research through its multiple research solutions, peer-reviewed journals, scientific conferences, e-books and weekly news periodical Chemical & Engineering News. ACS journals are among the most cited, most trusted and most read within the scientific literature; however, ACS itself does not conduct chemical research. As a leader in scientific information solutions, its CAS division partners with global innovators to accelerate breakthroughs by curating, connecting and analyzing the world’s scientific knowledge. ACS’ main offices are in Washington, D.C., and Columbus, Ohio.
Note: ACS does not conduct research but publishes and publicizes peer-reviewed scientific studies.
Follow us: Facebook | LinkedIn | Instagram
Journal
ACS Energy Letters
Article Title
Pathways to Electrochemical Ironmaking at Scale Via the Direct Reduction of Fe2O3
Article Publication Date
9-Apr-2025
