Sunday, June 01, 2025

The momentum towards Irish Unity is gathering at a pace – Pat Cullen, Sinn Fein

 

“Together we must take the skills, the creativity, the sense of community & solidarity that we enjoy in Ireland, to steadily build the unity campaign. It will not happen overnight, but we must all pull in the same direction.”

Sinn Féin MP for Fermanagh and South Tyrone Pat Cullen addressed the How do we chart a path to a Border Poll and win it? event hosted in Westminster by the Irish Border Poll campaign on 20th May 2025- you can read her remarks below.

My friends,

It’s great to join you for tonight’s discussion. This is an important and necessary discussion to be having. Critically, it’s an important discussion to be having with you: the Irish community and supporters of Irish unity here in Britain. 

It is a discussion that ought to be heard within these so-called “corridors of power” here in Westminster. Because no matter how much its opponents might wish it to go away, the political momentum towards Irish Unity is not stalling. In fact, it is only gathering at a pace.

Since October 2022, my party, Sinn Féin, has instituted a Commission on the Future of Ireland to facilitate and platform such conversations. Since its induction, the work of the Commission has only expanded.

In the last two months the Commission has held a Mid Ulster Peoples Assembly in the Seamus Heaney Homeplace in Bellaghy; an Irish language themed discussion in Bhaile Ghib in County Meath; a climate crisis conference ‘One Island, One Environment’ hosted in Dublin; and an EU & Irish Unity meeting inside the European Parliament in Brussels.

In addition, events have also been held in Washington and New York in the United States and in Montreal in Canada. Just last week, at the Balmoral Show, the Commission hosted a Rural Communities in a New Ireland discussion.

I am very excited that next week I will be out in the United States myself to address Commission meetings in Nashville, Cincinnati, and Chicago. And in early June, we will see a Health and Care in a New Ireland themed event in St Comgall’s Belfast. So, there’s plenty of work being done. 

Together we must take the skills, the creativity, the sense of community and solidarity that we enjoy in Ireland, to steadily build the unity campaign. It will not happen overnight, but we must all pull in the same direction.

Let me be clear, the desire for Irish unity is bigger than Sinn Féin. We welcome that it is. Because it has to be. We can’t do it all on our own.

That is why we welcome the work of the SDLP’s New Ireland Commission. That is why we welcome Irish Border PollTrade Unionists for a New and United Ireland, and Labour for Irish Unity. It is heartening to see independent civic organisations like Ireland’s Future – the Constitutional Conversations Group – and the Women’s Assemblies – bringing people together to discuss the future.

It is welcome to see a variety of organisations and groups setting out their stall for the unity debate that is to come. Because we know that it is coming. With each passing week, we see detailed scholarly studies and footnote-laden academic papers, all exploring the question of potential constitutional change in Ireland.

Over the past year, the Implementation of the Good Friday Agreement Committee which I sit on as a Northern MP, has published two detailed reports on constitutional change. In its July 2024 report, it concluded:

there are no insurmountable economic or financial barriers to unification. That the economic success of a new Ireland is in our own hands. What is needed now is detailed and ambitious preparations.”

So, with all this positivity and forward momentum, it is unfortunate that we have a government in Dublin that is, with some honourable exceptions, dragging its feet on the question of Irish unity.

As has been mentioned, we have a Taoiseach who tells us that ‘now is not the time’ to discuss Unity. That we must achieve reconciliation, something that would be hard to quantify or measure by any metric, before we can even begin to discuss constitutional change! Essentially, we’re being told that the North must wait.

Well, I’m here to stay that we will not be deterred, and we will not be delayed. No Taoiseach has the right to set the pace of our journey. No Taoiseach has the right to silence our demand for Irish unity. 

I would encourage the Taoiseach to come north and talk to ordinary people. This is a time of incredibly hope and optimism. A time of opportunity and possibility in the North.

Now is not the time to waiver. Not only is the Taoiseach wrong, he will be proven wrong. We will have a referendum on Irish Unity. And, most importantly, we will win that referendum on Irish Unity. To begin such a discussion on any other basis would be a disservice to the Irish people.

As they say, the first rule in politics is to learn how to count! And we have seen repeated opinion polls show us that the gap is narrowing between supporters and opponents of Irish Unity. In the North, one of the most interesting poll findings of recent times was that a significant growth in the number ‘Northern Ireland Protestants’ hold the opinion that, in the event of Irish Unity, they would either “happily accept it” (at 29%) or while not being entirely happy, they would nonetheless, ‘live with it’ (48%).

Meanwhile, across the border in the south, we regularly see both a clear majority in favour of unity. Plus, a clear majority recognising the need to prepare and plan for it in the time ahead.

So, my friends, with the need for preparation now broadly accepted, there is an even greater appreciation that a referendum is only a matter of time. I might say, it is now question of when and not if.

Therefore, we must now begin to move the discussion beyond the realm of aspiration and into the space of a tangible, strategic project. While the debate has never been so well-platformed and aired as it currently is; we now need to begin the work of translating that high-level debate onto the ground-level.

We need to communicate the need for unity far more clearly than we have so far. Beyond rhetoric and emotion. Because real political transformation is never produced by feelings alone, it is produced by material interests.

We have to acknowledge that, for ordinary people going about their daily lives, a united Ireland might not seem relevant to their immediate needs and wants. Yes, they might support Irish unity, it might seem like the common-sense approach, but that doesn’t necessarily mean they believe it’s a realistic or affordable proposal.

And it is on that ground that we now have to turn our attention. We need to speak a language that people understand, with a message that reaches them where they are today. We have to re-evaluate what we’re doing and respond to people’s needs.

We have to accept that Ireland today is not the Ireland of the 1950s, 60s, 70s, and so on. Imaginative and deliverable proposals must be put forward. With an acceptance that Ireland will continue to evolve long after reunification. With this in mind, the diligent work of civic and political coalition-building must intensify and focus its efforts.

Because while it can sometimes be hard to communicate the benefits of a hypothetical unified nation, there is little challenge in highlighting today the material costs of a partitioned island.

So, in conclusion, all of this will all require a mature and responsible response from the British Government. And that is why British politicians in Westminster need to know that these discussions, these conversations, are happening. Whether they like it or not.


UK

#Trace the Money!


 

Covid Action campaigners are calling on the UK Covid-19 Inquiry to find out where the billions allocated to the failed NHS Test and Trace went.

Why did the Government outsource Test and Trace, sidelining professional public health experts in local government? Was it ideological or just a way of increasing the private sector’s profits?

 In the early years of the pandemic, Baroness Dido Harding of Winscombe and Prof. Dame Jenny Harries led NHS Test and Trace. Both are giving evidence to the Inquiry on Wednesday 28th May.  Will they be asked who made the decision to outsource Test and Trace and where our money went?

 Private corporations with no relevant experience were handed billions yet failed to deliver a functional service, while their profits soared. It was an outsourced, centralised money pit, which gobbled up a staggering £36 billion of our money.

 There was no meaningful support for people self-isolating, meaning many people struggled to stay home and not go to work.

 Instead of using the expertise and local knowledge of long-established public health departments, the NHS Test and Trace app worked only for those with mobile phones, forced thousands of worried families to travel long distances to get tested, and soon became an irrelevance – more often switched off or its alerts ignored than recognised by the public as a key tool in preventing the spread of the Covid virus.

 For centuries Test, Trace and Isolate has been the bedrock of identifying and responding to infectious diseases. But this time the Government seems to have been more interested in technology than people; more interested in developing an app than saving lives. It ignored offers to provide mass testing in favour of turning to management consultants. It ignored warnings of asymptomatic transmission. As a consequence, thousands died.

 Covid is still with us, but this Government is as unprepared for the inevitable next pandemic as the last was. Testing is rare and tracing non-existent. The lack of testing means that there is little data to assess the real extent of Covid or whether more virulent and infectious variants are evolving.

“NHS Test and Trace is one of the many scandals of the Tory government’s handling of the Covid pandemic emergency,” Covid Action’s Sioux Vosper, whose father died from Covid in April 2020, said. “The Inquiry must get to the bottom of where all those billions went and ensure that lessons are learnt so that in the event of any future pandemics public health professionals are provided with the resources and support to implement an efficient and effective test and trace system which drives down transmission and saves lives.”

Covid Action supporters will be demonstrating outside the Covid Inquiry at Dorland House, London W2 6BU at 12.45pm on Wednesday 28th May with the slogan #Trace the Money!

COVID ACTION UK is a grassroots, activist campaign of individuals and affiliated labour and trade union organisations who came together in November 2020 to challenge the then UK government’s approach to the pandemic. Website: https://covidaction.uk/ Module 7 of the UK Covid-19 Inquiry’s Public Hearings is on Test, Trace and Isolate and runs from 12th-30th May 2025 at Dorland House, London W2 6BU.

Over 300 UK writers brand Israel’s actions ‘genocide’ in call for immediate ceasefire

28 May, 2025
Left Foot Forward

"The government of Israel has renewed its assault on Gaza with unrestrained brutality."



More than 300 of the most prominent writers from the UK and Ireland have called Israel’s actions in Gaza ‘genocide’. In an open letter, the group of writers also called for their governments to push for an immediate ceasefire.

Among the signatories to the letter are the novelists Jeanette Winterson, Kate Mosse, Zadie Smith, Ian McEwan and Irvine Welsh.

Opening the letter, the group said: “We, the undersigned writers of England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, ask our nations and the peoples of the world to join us in ending our collective silence and inaction in the face of horror.”

The letter continues by saying: “The government of Israel has renewed its assault on Gaza with unrestrained brutality. Public statements by Israeli ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir openly express genocidal intentions. The use of the words “genocide” or “acts of genocide” to describe what is happening in Gaza is no longer debated by international legal experts or human rights organizations. Amnesty International, Médecins Sans Frontières, Human Rights Watch, the International Federation for Human Rights, the United Nations Human Rights Council, and many other specialists and historians have clearly identified genocide or acts of genocide in Gaza, enacted by the Israel Defence Force and directed by the government of Israel.”

Later, the letter goes on to explain why the writers refer to what has taken place in Gaza as ‘genocide’. It reads: “The term “genocide” is not a slogan. It carries legal, political, and moral responsibilities. Just as it is true to call the atrocities committed by Hamas against innocent civilians on 7 October 2023 crimes of war and crimes against humanity, so today it is true to name the attack on the people of Gaza an atrocity of genocide, with crimes of war and crimes against humanity, committed daily by the Israeli Defence Forces, at the command of the government of the State of Israel.”

Concluding, the group of writers call for sanctions on Israel until the Israeli government agrees to a ceasefire, for unrestricted distribution of food and medical aid in Gaza, and for the release of Israeli hostages and Palestinian prisoners arbitrarily detained in Israeli jails.

The letter is the latest in a number of interventions from major public figures in the UK. Earlier in the week, more than 800 lawyers called for the UK government to consider initiating proceedings to suspend Israel from the United Nations as a result of its actions in Gaza.

800 lawyers have called for the UK government to consider pushing for Israel’s suspension from the UN


Chris Jarvis 
27 May, 2025 
t Left Foot Forward

The group of senior lawyers have also called for sanctions to be imposed on Israel




More than 800 lawyers have called for the UK government to consider pushing for Israel’s suspension from the United Nations (UN) over its ongoing assault on Gaza. In a letter to the prime minister Keir Starmer, the lawyers, academics and senior judges said that this was in order for the UK to meet its ‘international legal obligations’, and also called for sanctions in Israel.

The letter calls for the UK government to use its position as a permanent members of the UN Security Council to consider initiating proceedings in to suspend Israel from the UN.

Opening their letter, the lawyers wrote: “Serious violations of international law are being committed and are further threatened by Israel in the [Occupied Palestinian Territories].”

The letter goes on to say “genocide is being perpetrated in Gaza or, at a minimum, there is a serious risk of genocide occurring” and that “war crimes, crimes against humanity, and serious violations of international humanitarian law are being committed”.

The lawyers also went on to highlight rulings of the International Court of Justice in relation to Israel’s actions, saying: “Israel has been found by the International Court of Justice in July 2024 to be violating peremptory norms of international law across the entire oPt in denying the Palestinian people their right to self-determination and unlawfully annexing territory acquired by force.”

Later in their letter, the lawyers say that the UK government has failed to meet its legal obligations to “take all reasonable steps within their power to prevent and punish genocide”.

According to the Guardian, Alan Moses, a former chair of the bar of England and Wales said of the letter: “We, in the UK, cannot expect peace unless we fulfil our obligations under international law. That is what upholding the rule of law means. It is an exercise in futility for a government to say it upholds the rule of law, if it then does nothing to demonstrate it.”

Among the other calls in the letter is for the UK government to use all available means to “secure an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza”, push for Israel to lift its ban on the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, and to execute arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court.

In Gaza, starvation is deployed as a weapon – Apsana Begum MP

 

“Starvation is deployed as a weapon. Aid is blocked to collectively punish civilians. For months, 2.3 million Palestinians have been denied food and medicine. All the while, Israeli airstrikes rain relentlessly on hospitals, homes, and schools.”

By Apsana Begum MP

The below speech was delivered at the 17th May 2025 Nakba 77 demonstration in central London, called by Palestine Solidarity Campaign and partner organisations.

For years, I’ve stood with you at protests, condemning Israel’s oppression and crimes against humanity inflicted on the Palestinian people.

Today, I stand here again as we also mark the long years of displacement, mass expulsion and dispossession.

Because I, like you, know we must keep speaking truth to power—even as repression against dissent escalates.

Protest empowers communities to confront injustice, and that is exactly why we’re witnessing brutal crackdowns.

History reminds us of protest’s vital role in driving change, which is why undemocratic forces seek to evade accountability.

But no spin can mask the truth: the UK and U.S. continue to pursue foreign policy with callous indifference to Palestinian lives.

Beyond political theatrics, their hypocrisy is laid bare—censorship, complicity, and UK-made arms slaughtering civilians, 70% of them women and children.

This week, the UN heard of Israel’s forced displacement of Gazans into shrinking enclaves—80% of Gaza now militarized or under evacuation orders.

As I speak, starvation is deployed as a weapon. Aid is blocked to collectively punish civilians. For months, 2.3 million Palestinians have been denied food and medicine.

All the while, Israeli airstrikes rain relentlessly on hospitals, homes, and schools.

Shame on those who have stood by and allowed this to happen. Shame on those who have been complicit.

The actions of the British political establishment have been of tremendous damage to democracy at home, the UK’s reputation abroad and indeed the standing of human rights benchmarks around the world.

There is no doubt that everything that the UK Government has done, everything it continues to do and everything it fails to do, will forever haunt its legacy.

Instead, our movement against war and injustice continues to bring people from all over the world – from all faiths, all ethnicities, all backgrounds.

Demanding aid to support the starving, injured and dispossessed.

Calling for justice and accountability.

Reasserting the unalienable truth that Palestinian people have a right to self-determination.

There can be no “ifs” or “buts” or indeed “eventually” or “sometime in the future”.

No more empty promises.

There needs to be an immediate recognition of a Palestinian state. Now.

I look around me today and see how we are bound by our shared humanity and just purpose:

We will keep speaking out.

We will keep fighting for justice.

We will keep standing for what we know to be right.

Because no one is free until all people are free.




Dozens of UK MPs sign motion calling for ban on arms exports to Israel


30 May, 2025 
Left Foot Forward

Zarah Sultana is the primary sponsor of the Early Day Motion


A cross-party group of MPs has issued a call for a ban on arms exports to Israel. 42 MPs have signed an Early Day Motion (EDM) making the call.

The EDM calls for “the Government to immediately suspend all arms exports to Israel in line with majority public opinion”.

It then goes on to say: “Britain has exported over 8,600 munitions, 116 goods in the category of tanks, armoured vehicles and parts thereof and continued direct shipments of F-35 parts after UK’s suspension of licenses in September 2024”, before claiming that this “contradicts ministerial claims to have banned arms sales that could be used in Gaza, including direct supply of F-35 parts to Israel”.

The EDM has been proposed in the context of Israel’s ongoing assault on Gaza which has already killed more than 50,000 people.

MPs from Labour, the Lib Dems, the Greens, the SNP, the SDLP, Alliance, Plaid Cymru have signed the EDM, alongside a number of independents.

The EDM has been proposed by the independent MP Zarah Sultana.

The full list of signatories is as follows:Zarah Sultana (Independent)
Jeremy Corbyn (Independent)
Andrew George (Liberal Democrat)
Carla Denyer (Green)
Apsana Begum (Independent)
Diane Abbott (Labour)
John McDonnell (Independent)
Richard Burgon (Labour)
Ian Byrne (Labour)
Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour)
Jon Trickett (Labour)
Brian Leishman (Labour)
Kim Johnson (Labour)
Claire Hanna (SDLP)
Iqbal Mohamed (Independent)
Nadia Whittome (Labour)
Brendan O’Hara (SNP)
Kirsty Blackman (SNP)
Sorcha Eastwood (Alliance)
Ben Lake (Plaid Cymru)
Ian Lavery (Labour)
Sian Berry (Green)
Ayoub Khan (Independent)
Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru)
Llinos Medi (Plaid Cymru)
Ann Davies (Plaid Cymru)
Andrew Gwynne (Independent)
Neil Duncan-Jordan (Labour)
Peter Lamb (Labour)
Ellie Chowns (Green)
Adrian Ramsay (Green)
Imran Hussain (Labour)
Shockat Adam (Independent)
Graham Leadbitter (SNP)
Olivia Blake (Labour)
Seamus Logan (SNP)
Chris Law (SNP)
Cat Smith (Labour)
Dave Doogan (SNP)
Steve Witherden (Labour)
Simon Opher (Labour)
Adnan Hussain (Independent)


Chris Jarvis is head of strategy and development at Left Foot Forward


The utterly intolerable failure to act of Keir Starmer


MAY 28,2025

Tom London condemns the Prime Minister’s performative policy on Israel.

One week ago, Keir Starmer described the situation in Gaza as “utterly intolerable”.He spoke as if he understood the moral imperative to act with the utmost urgency to do everything possible to stop the human catastrophe unfolding in Gaza.

On every day of the week since, around one hundred more Palestinians have died. Every single day. Throughout this genocidal abomination over the last 19 months, over 70% of the dead have been women and children and it is reasonable to assume that would be the case here.

Each of the dead has a name, had dreams, loved and was loved. The Palestinian dead are rarely humanised in the UK media. It is far easier to ignore a statistic.

A member of the Israeli Parliament, the Knesset, Tzippy Scott said on live TV last week, “Last night, we killed almost a hundred Gazans… Nobody cares (about it) anymore… Everyone got used to the idea that you can kill 100 Gazans in one night… And nobody in the world cares.” He was revelling in the impunity granted to Israel by the outside world.

 In Gaza, where half of the population are children, the threat of death is all-ncompassing. Starving people are living more like animals than humans amongst the ruins or in makeshift tents. Death may come from starvation or dehydration or infectious disease or from lack of medicines and medical care for perfectly treatable conditions.

Or death may come by incineration in a fireball following the dropping of a huge bomb, or by sniper bullets, or by bullets from incessant drones or by tank shells or by missile strikes. 

What is happening right now in Gaza is like the bleakest, most terrifying dystopia that has been imagined. 

Many survivors are amputees. All of them will surely carry the mental scars for life. 

Benjamin Netanyahu no longer bothers to lie about his intentions. He has declared openly, brazenly, that nothing will stop what he calls the war (but which is, in reality, now a genocide, pure and simple). 

Netanyahu would not stop the war if the remaining hostages were freed. They would already have been freed if Israel had not unilaterally broken the ceasefire agreement. His aim is a Gaza totally destroyed with none of the original 2.2 million Palestinians living there. They will all have been ethnically cleansed to “somewhere else” – an unspecified place – or they will all have been killed.

A week ago, Starmer issued a joint statement with the leaders of France and Canada. They threatened Israel and promised the Palestinians and people around the world opposing the genocide in Gaza, to “take concrete actions” if Israel did not cease its onslaught on Gaza and lift restrictions on the supply of aid.

Starmer announced two immediate steps to back up the new position – a suspension of trade talks with Israel and the Israeli Ambassador was to be summonsed for a stern dressing down by the Junior Minister – no one explained why it was not the Foreign Secretary as protocol would usually require.

Now it is reported that the UK’s Trade Envoy Lord Austin is in Israel carrying out his job of encouraging trade between the UK and Israel, just as if last week’s announcement had never been made.

Starmer’s words were merely performative. He did not mean what he said but he wanted to be able to say, “Look what I said.” 

He has kept on sending arms to Israel and in greater quantities than the previous Conservative Government. His government has strongly defended a case in the High Court to allow them to continue to send Israel vital components for the F-35 fighter jets, which Israel uses to bomb Gazans. He has kept sending Israel regular surveillance reports using RAF planes based in Cyprus.

There has been no let-up whatsoever in Israel’s onslaught on Gaza’s civilians.

It is true that Israel is allowing some more aid into Gaza, but it is a mere drop in the ocean. Almost all the aid that is needed is still being held up at the border by the Israeli Army.

Meanwhile, Israel has set up a new aid project designed to bypass the UN. Twenty-four Western foreign ministers have condemned this new organisation. Its head has since resigned, saying the organisation would not be able to fulfil the principles of “humanity, neutrality, impartiality, and independence”. It looks as if it is a cynical device intended to be a distraction from the urgent need for aid to be properly distributed by the UN to end starvation while babies, children and adults die every day from starvation.

After his ringing declaration a week ago, what “concrete actions”has Starmer taken or even specifically threatened? None whatsoever.

It is an utterly intolerable failure to act.

Tom London is an activist based in north London.

Upcoming activities



The UK-India FTA and the missed chance for justice


May 28, 2025

Kumar Nerlakanti and K Singh analyse a deal that will be remembered, not for what it achieved, but for what it ignored and enabled.

On the day the UK finalised its much-touted Free Trade Agreement with India, the Indian state launched an attack on Pakistan along with an ongoing broad crackdown on Kashmiri and Muslim civilians, without offering any evidence for the alleged role of Pakistan in the Pehelgam incident.

It was a moment thick with symbolism. While politicians in London and Delhi celebrated the deal as a “win-win,” those of us fighting for human rights, worker dignity, and international solidarity saw it for what it truly was: a missed opportunity to say enough is enough.

India Labour Solidarity has consistently raised concerns about this FTA. In our submission to the UK Government and Parliament, we highlighted the economic imbalances and the ethical and human rights crises that such a deal risks overlooking. Our model motion laid bare the truth: trade without justice is just another way to entrench inequality.

Yet that’s exactly what has happened. The deal went through, and with it, silence on the relentless attacks on workers, farmers, Adivasis (indigenous and tribal), oppressed castes and minorities in India and also any accountability of how the divisive politics of the region are now spilling out into the streets of the UK, as we have seen in Leicester.

There was also silence on the crackdown in Kashmir, the violence in Manipur, and the destruction in Bastar. Silence on the abuse of power, of crony capitalists like Adani displacing indigenous people, bulldozing forests in India, and setting up shop that assists in atrocities against Palestinian people (this behaviour is in line with the current Labour Government approving three times more weapons sales than previous years). This is the same Adani that’s been greenwashing its crimes by sponsoring science museums in the UK, while being investigated by financial watchdogs for major irregularities. Now, with the FTA in place, companies like Adani stand to gain even more, at the expense of people, land, and justice.

Similarly, this signing is a betrayal for Jagtar “Jaggi” Singh Johal’s family, who have been tirelessly campaigning, with Reprieve and over 100 MPs and peers, for Britain’s Government to pressure India for his release due to lack of evidence for his alleged funding of the assassination of far-right Hindu nationalists. Many believe he was targeted solely for his online activism in documenting human rights abuses in India against Sikhs in 1984 and onwards. He has even been acquitted in his first trial, many years after his arrest, yet remains imprisoned on similar charges.

Gurpreet Singh Johal, a Labour councillor, has denounced the inaction of consecutive British Governments on his brother’s arbitrary imprisonment and has specifically stated that he believes Britain is prioritising an FTA over his brother’s life. The fact that this has now been signed while a British citizen remains imprisoned in India – despite the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention having found this case to be a breach of Jaggi’s human rights and calling for his release and compensation – shows that Gurpreet was right.

Douglas McAllister, a Labour MP, had asked for the FTA negotiations to include the demand for Jaggi’s release. It seems he was completely overlooked, which could reasonably be interpreted as further evidence of both racial bias and financial considerations influencing when the British Government chooses to prioritize the welfare of its own citizens.

This signing has been opposed by Indian farmers’ unions who gained global fame during their 2020-2022 struggle against the neoliberal farm laws. The farmers’ unions specifically stated that this treaty was signed without appropriate parliamentary scrutiny and, particularly, despite opposition from fish workers and cattle farmers, as well as farmers.

Dr Dhawale of the Samyukt Kisan Morcha was quoted by The Hindu newspaper as saying that, regarding reduced tariffs enabling dumping in India’s markets: “This will act against the interest of farmers, fish workers and micro, small and medium enterprises that are engaged in food processing. In the past, all such free trade agreements, both bilateral and multilateral, have failed the Indian farmers and small industries.”

Pavel Kussa of the Bharatiya Kisan Union (Ekta Ugrahan) was quoted as saying this trade deal will tighten the “imperial grip” on India which “has created hurdles in our development. Now, more foreign products will be dumped here. This reminds us of the East India Company’s colonial rule over India. The Union Government wants to hand over the country’s markets to imperialist rulers yet again.”

While the Indian Government may claim they’ve avoided concessions on sensitive agricultural products, the farmers’ unions are right to be vigilant. This deal undoubtedly signals that the Government continues to define national interest based on corporate interests and the mythology of trickle-down economics, rather than rural and producing communities, as the unions define it. Our submission to EFRA (the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee) covered some of the concerns highlighted by the farmers.

Both Governments have been willing to sign a deal despite unresolved disputes and underlying issues of rural poverty and exploitation under unfair global and local rules on agriculture. Regarding ongoing disputes in India, it must be noted that despite a drop in global attention, the farmers’ struggle is ongoing, due to the state’s betrayal of previous agreements with the farmers. However, this time protestors have been prevented from crossing internal state borders and reaching Delhi as they did last time. On 20th March this year, the longstanding protest sites at these state borders were bulldozed, and hundreds of protestors were arrested. Such matters of democratic principle ought to be of central importance in any deal signed by Britain with India. It is telling that India’s government is capable of making deals with Britain but not with its citizens, whose demands are suppressed with force.

Importantly, Delhi’s neoliberal attack on agriculture is understood by the farmers’ movement as part of a wider imperialist pressure on Global South producers. Hence, a consistent demand of the movement has been withdrawal from the World Trade Organisation and suspension of all FTAs under the Agreement on Agriculture. As Sukhwinder Kaur – the Punjab state general secretary of BKU (Krantikari) – put it, the WTO’s “Agreement on Agriculture caters only to the interests of imperialist monopolies, while depriving India of its economic sovereignty, and ensnaring us, farmers, to lose our autonomy as agricultural producers.”

She has faced repression and intimidation for her peaceful organising. The Indian Government has ignored all opposition to the unfair global trade regime and has shown again by signing this deal that they represent the interests of local and global corporate interests, and not the working people of India.

Meanwhile, the British government is predictably continuing a tradition of masking exploitation as ‘free trade’ despite the supposed fairness of these neocolonial agreements being debunked and rejected by people’s movements across the Global South and development experts across the world. In relation to this, India Labour Solidarity have an upcoming webinar “Ongoing farmers struggles in India: interrogating caste, class and gender” on farmers’ struggle on 30th May at 12:30pm, and you can register for it by bit.ly/PunjabFarmers or can catch up on our YouTube.

Amid all this, much was made of the reduction of tariffs on Scotch whisky and gin, one of the most celebrated aspects of the deal in the UK press. But there was no consideration of the devastating social impact of alcohol abuse in India, particularly in rural and marginalised communities, where it has deepened poverty, fuelled gender-based violence, and stretched already crumbling public healthcare systems. This is at a time when India’s public health infrastructure is under immense pressure and ill-equipped to deal with a spike in alcohol-related harm.

According to India’s National Family Health Survey, over a quarter of men in many states consume alcohol regularly, and studies have shown high correlations between alcohol use and domestic violence, debt, and poor health outcomes. The World Health Organisation has also linked alcohol to thousands of deaths in India, whether from road accidents, cancer (alcohol is a recognised Group 1 carcinogen), liver cirrhosis, or other health issues.

For this to be a bragging point of the agreement exposes the hypocrisy of the BJP and also that British capital is still operating within the same mentality as the time of the Opium Wars. This is because in much of Indian society, alcohol is not as normalised or socially accepted as it is in sections of British/urban/Western society. This is reflected in the fact that several states in India, notably including Gujarat – Indian PM Narendra Modi’s own home state and a BJP base – ban alcohol. Other states in India have varying degrees of regulation, and alcohol is a contentious issue across India to a greater degree than it is in some Western countries. This is also why Sikh organisations pushed Boris Johnson into a public apology for making jokes about alcohol exports in a Sikh gurdwara after a lady there told him it was firstly not the appropriate place to do so, and secondly that alcoholism had caused harm in her family.

The absence of any public health safeguards or commitments from the Scotch whisky industry, which benefits from the reduced tariffs as part of the deal, makes a mockery of claims that it is rooted in sustainable development. For the socially conservative BJP, who boast of its “Make in India” initiatives, to be signing a deal that seems to centre on alcohol imports exposes that they are ultimately answerable to global capital, and this can take priority even over their Hindutva.

We are relieved that the worst fears around access to generic medicines in the NHS may not have materialised in this agreement, according to the comments by the Pharma Industry which were lobbying heavily for it, a rare exception in a sea of problems. But the deal still fails to address the quality of drugs being exported. Substandard medicines and opiods manufactured in India continue to cause devastation in countries across Africa, and this issue remains unscrutinised, despite mounting evidence.

It is worth recalling that the COVID vaccine brought the longstanding debates about the neocolonial and counterproductive nature of the global patents regime and TRIPS (the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights), as campaigned on by groups such as Global Justice Now, to global attention. We are glad to see this intellectual property-hoarding regime has not been deepened but it is a shame that this intellectual property regime, which exists to harm the interests of the Global South, is committed to being legitimised.

Meanwhile, in the UK, right-wing politicians have begun to weaponize the bilateral agreement to serve their own agendas. Indian workers, who already pay twice for access to public services through NHS surcharges and receive limited social protections, gained some relief through the FTA. However, this progress has met with a backlash. Right-wing voices have used the agreement as a dog whistle, portraying Indian workers as being favoured over British workers and calling for a reversal of these provisions. This reaction persists even though similar benefits are already extended to workers from over 50 other countries.

While the Indian government is celebrating this agreement as a diplomatic win, it has remained notably silent on the harmful consequences of the UK government’s proposed subsequent immigration policy changes through its white paper on immigration. These include:Extending the settlement route from five to ten years, prolonging periods of insecure status and exploitative work conditions without access to social security.
Reducing the tenure of graduate visas to just 18 months, limiting opportunities for post-study work, and integration.
Restricting care workers’ rights to bring family members, undermining family unity, and support systems.
Escalating hostile rhetoric from senior political figures, which fuels xenophobia and worsens the environment for migrants amid the rise of right-wing politics.

The continuation of the Hostile Environment policy by the Labour government has placed significant strain on the well-being of Indian migrants. Measures such as elevated income thresholds for spousal visas are separating families who have found love in the UK and wish to build a life together. Additionally, the rising cost of visa applications adds further pressure. This represents a missed opportunity for the Indian Government to advocate more strongly for the rights of its diaspora.

Perhaps most insidiously, this FTA has given cover to a new form of soft power and propaganda. Across party lines, we are witnessing the rise of ‘Friends of India’ groups and think tanks often funded by or aligned with regime-friendly entities that serve as the PR arm of the Indian government. These groups speak the language of democracy and development, but what they legitimise is repression: against trade unions, farmers’ movements, human rights activists, journalists and religious minorities, and the caste oppressed. They cheerlead for a government that jails students and lets lynch mobs run free.

The UK had a chance. It could have made human rights a red line. It could have demanded protections for workers, for press freedom, for Adivasi land. It could have put justice at the heart of trade. Instead, it chose silence.

This deal will be remembered not for what it achieved, but for what it ignored and enabled.

Now that Governments are lining up to align with a Hindutva fascist government that bans BBC documentaries about i’s own ethnic cleansing in Gujarat, it is more important than ever for movements of the world to stand with the people’s movements, activists, and dissenting journalists of South Asia.

Kumar Nerlakanti and K Singh are organisers with India Labour Solidarity.

Image: Indian farmers protest, December 2020. Source: Provided by eMail from Randeep Maddoke. Author: Randeep Maddoke; randeepphotoartist@gmail.com, made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication

How long will the India-Pakistan ceasefire last?




May 31, 2025

The fragile ceasefire between India and Pakistan after recent military clashes is far from the end of the story. Ahead of an important webinar, Carol Turner explains why hostilities between these two neighbours pose an ever-present threat to South Asia.

An attack on Pahalgam in Indian-administered Kashmir on 22nd April 2025 resulted in the death of 26 people. After five days of military strikes by India and Pakistan that followed, a fragile ceasefire was established on 10th May. The Indian government claims Pakistan-based insurgent groups were behind the attack. The Pakistan government denies aiding the attack and has called for an independent investigation into its origins.

In response to the Pahalgam attack, India launched Operation Sindoor targeting what it claimed were terrorist sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir. Pakistan retaliated with missile attacks, triggering the most serious military confrontation of recent years. Both sides employed

drones and precision-guided munitions, highlighting the impact new technology is beginning to have on modern war fighting.

This hostile exchange between India and Pakistan over Kashmir is the latest in a series of clashes that began 80 years ago with partition of the Indian sub-continent in 1947. The end of Britain’s colonial rule, saw the country split into Indian-administered and Pakistan-administered territories, which remain separated by a 450-mile Line of Control delineating a border between the territories each controls that was established by UN resolution in 1948.

After a major war between Pakistan and India in 1971, the two signed the Simla peace accord, agreeing to resolve the Kashmir conflict by peaceful means and to respect the Line of Control. There have been many military clashes across the border since then, however, and despite the current ceasefire underlying tensions between the two neighbours show little sign of abating.

Pahalgam underscored how volatile the relationship between India and Pakistan is, while the recent military exchanges provide a warning of the increased dangers posed by modern technology at the service of India and Pakistan in any future conflicts. Perhaps most concerning of all though, Pahalgam reminds us of the ever-present risk of nuclear conflict in the region. By the end of the 1990s both India and Pakistan had become nuclear weapons states. They currently have approximately balanced nuclear arsenals of around 200 warheads each – more than enough to lay waste to South Asia.

As Trinational Institute Fellow and active member of the Coalition for Nuclear Disarmament and Peace (India) Achin Vanaik puts it: “South Asia is the only part of the world where there are two nuclear armed countries with an 80-year history of continuous hot-cold wars that show no signs of ending.’”

Murad Qureshi, a British Muslim whose family hails from Bangladesh, maintains a keen interest in South Asia. Better known to many as a former member of the London Assembly, Murad sums up the situation, saying: “The Kashmir conflict casts a long shadow over South Asia. Opinions on the likelihood of nuclear conflict vary, but that potential is ever present.”

London CND’s webinar on the India Pakistan conflict over Kashmir with Murad Qureshi and Achin Vanaik on 2nd June, is an opportunity to explore the issues further with two speakers who are steeped in the history of this conflict. Register in advance to join this timely discussion.

Carol Turner is Chair of the London Region Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament and Convenor of CND’s International Advisory Group. She is author of Corbyn and Trident: Labour’s continuing controversy and Walter Wolfgang a political life.

Map image: Kashmir. Source:  File:Kashmir map.svg Author Original:: w:user:Planemad. Derived work: Soumya-8974, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.


UK Austerity must be ended – on all fronts

MAY 28, 2025

Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s belated announcement that he is rethinking the cuts to the winter fuel payments is welcome and underlines the fact that public pressure – especially at the ballot box – is effective, even over a government with a huge majority.

This partial U-turn falls a long way short of complete reinstatement of the Winter Fuel Benefit, which has been the campaign’s focus. As Jan Shortt, General Secretary of the National Pensioners Convention, commented: “NPC has been campaigning tirelessly for the full reinstatement of the universal Winter Fuel Payment, and it looks like this may be a first step towards success. But, as always the devil is in the detail, and the government wants to wait until the autumn before they let us all know what they are actually planning.

“While this announcement is a welcome step, it takes no account of individual everyday living costs and the damage that has already been done over the coldest months of the year.  Nine million older people lost the universal payment when the government scrapped it in favour of means testing.  Many have now endured a long winter without this vital assistance, with ever increasing energy bills not to mention the rising costs of food and other essentials.”

Writing in the GuardianJon Trickett MP called for the government to go further and completely reverse the cut, which he had voted against. He pointed out that Britain is one of the wealthiest countries in the world, “but  the richest 50 families in the UK own more wealth than half of the population.”

Responding to the partial U-turn, Simon Francis, coordinator of the End Fuel Poverty Coalition, said: “What matters now is the detail, especially if Winter Fuel Payments are not restored to all pensioners.

“There are three tests we will apply to any announcement based on thresholds, tapers and wider targeting to see if ministers are getting the message. We need to see the Pension Credit threshold raised significantly, a taper system introduced to stop people missing out on Winter Fuel Payments for being just £1 over the line, and wider targeting of this support, including for those on non-means tested disability benefits or Carer’s Allowance.

“Above all, ministers must learn lessons from this scandalous decision. Sadly, there are rumours that the Chancellor is planning to water down the Warm Homes Plan promised in the Labour manifesto and reduce the £13.2bn promised to it. Any dilution of the proposals will mean fewer older people can be helped to reduce their energy use in a safe way.”

Some 3.2 million pensioner households are facing unaffordable energy costs, MPs were told last week, with around 964,000 households in deep fuel poverty, meaning they spend more than 20% of their income on energy.

The Work and Pensions Select Committee also heard evidence heard that health workers too are raising the alarm about pensioner poverty. A recent Medact survey found that three-quarters of clinicians regularly see patients made ill by poor housing conditions, and almost half have discharged patients into homes they knew would make them sick again. 

According to Age UK, 35% of pensioners earning less than £20,000 said their home was too cold most or all of the time this January, and nearly half said they were worried about the effect of energy prices on their health.

The campaign is also urging MPs to accept the recommendations of the Future of Local Welfare Inquiry report and make the Household Support Fund permanent. Campaigners have also called MPs to back reform the Warm Home Discount, and modernise the Cold Weather Payment into an “Extreme Weather Payment” that reaches vulnerable households before temperatures drop dangerously low.

Child poverty

Campaigners are now calling for austerity to be abandoned on other fronts. Diane Abbott MP said: “The Labour leadership should review other planned cuts. They are an attack on the most vulnerable and they damage Labour too.”

A recent briefing by Save the Children states that child poverty in the UK reached a record high in March 2025, with 4.5 million children affected. It calls for the scrapping of the two-child limit and the benefit cap.

Zarah Sultana MP tweeted: “35,000 more children have been pushed into poverty since Labour took office — because they kept the two-child benefit cap. That’s not just a number. That’s real children, facing real hardship, every single day. I voted to scrap it. I’d do it again.”

Even the fiscally prudent Gordon Brown has demolished the ideas that scrapping what he called the “cruel” two-child limit is unaffordable and outlined tax options for funding its abolition – starting with a £2.4bn increase in taxation of the gambling industry.

Disability benefit cuts

The third area of social policy austerity where the government faces mounting pressure is cuts to disability benefits. Dr Mary-Ann Stephenson, Director at the Women’s Budget Group, points out: “Women will be disproportionately impacted by these changes. 62% of the 1.32 million people set to lose PIP are women, largely due to musculoskeletal conditions and arthritis being much more prevalent among women, conditions which will be less likely to meet the new criteria.

“Stripping Disabled women of this income will undermine their economic independence and make them more reliant on partners and family members, and so more vulnerable to abuse.

“The Government also needs to recognise the knock-on impacts of these cuts. PIP is a gateway benefit for Carer’s Allowance, and it’s estimated that 150,000 unpaid carers will lose access to it as a result of these changes. Nearly three-quarters of Carer’s Allowance recipients are women.

“Cutting disability support doesn’t remove the need, it just shifts the cost. Those who will lose PIP will either have to cover the costs themselves, which could leave them struggling financially or rely on unpaid care usually provided by women. They in turn will either have to reduce their working hours or drop out of the workforce to provide that care. It’s hard to square this with the Chancellor’s goal of getting people into work.

“These cuts are a political choice, not an unavoidable necessity. The Government is choosing to make Disabled people and women pay the price to meet self-imposed fiscal rules, instead of asking those with the broadest shoulders.”

Nadia Whittome MP tweeted: “I will continue to oppose these cuts. I reiterated my pledge to vote against them if the government pushes ahead.”

Kim Johnson MP said: “These cuts are sadistically cruel. I wasn’t elected to inflict harm onto the most vulnerable in our society – I will be voting against these cuts.”

Brian Leisham MP agreed: “I’ll continue to campaign and vote against these awful cuts.”

RALLY – Halt Disability Benefit Cuts Now!

Join Zarah Sultana MP, Ellen Clifford (DPAC,) John McDonnell MP, Sarah Woolley (BFAWU) and more.

Tuesday, June 10th, 6:30 – 8pm ONLINE. Register here.

Organised by Arise – A Festival of Left Ideas

Photo: c/o Labour Hub.