Wednesday, September 03, 2025

BRICS OF SOLIDARITY

China Demand Shields Petrobras From U.S. Tariff Fallout

Strong demand for crude oil from Asian countries, especially China, has insulated Brazil’s Petrobras from the worst of the tariff war fallout, chief executive Magda Chambriard told Bloomberg in an interview.

“There is a lot of demand in Asia for our products,” Chambriard told the publication at an industry event in Sao Paulo, adding that China was the biggest buyer of its crude. The country accounted for 52% of Petrobras’ oil exports over the second quarter of the year, according to Bloomberg.

Europe was the Brazilian state major’s second-largest market over the three-month period, taking in 19% of total oil exports. It was followed by the rest of Asia, accounting for 12% of the total or the second quarter. The United States took in 8% of Petrobras’ oil exports, and Latin America accounted for 6%.

The Trump administration slapped 50% tariffs on Brazil last month, prompting expectations that oil flows from South America’s biggest producer will get redirected to Asia. Petrobras’ Chambriard has just confirmed this.

The U.S. was Brazil’s third-largest oil buyer, importing around 189,000 barrels per day in the first quarter of the year, or 11% of Brazil’s total oil exports, according to data from ship-tracking firm Vortexa and Kpler. China and Europe were the top destinations, importing 654,000 bpd and 446,000 bpd, respectively.

In the second quarter, even before the higher tariffs, the U.S. had slipped to number four among the biggest importers of Brazilian crude. The tariffs were President Trump’s choice for penalizing the Brazilian government for the persecution of former president Jair Bolsonaro. In a similar fashion, Trump slapped 50% tariffs on Indian imports to punish the country for buying Russian crude.

Currently, the U.S. is not such a major buyer of Brazilian crude, which further strengthens Petrobras’ resilience to Washington’s trade policies, the CEO of the company suggested in her interview with Bloomberg.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

 

IEA Considers Brazil's Membership Bid

Brazil wants a seat at the International Energy Agency’s table, filing a formal request this week to move from partner status to full membership.

On Tuesday in Paris, Brazil’s ambassador delivered a letter from Foreign Affairs Minister Mauro Vieira and Mines and Energy Minister Alexandre Silveira to IEA chief Fatih Birol, saying the government wanted to begin the accession process. The ministers pointed to the IEA’s support on energy security, data, and policy analysis, while stressing Brazil’s weight as both a major oil exporter and a leader in renewable power.

“Recognising the challenges that lie ahead in the energy landscape and the strategic support that the IEA provides to its member countries … [we are] pleased to inform you that our government would like to initiate accession procedures to the IEA as a full member,” the letter said.

For the IEA, Brazil’s bid is significant. Latin America’s largest economy brings both heft and contradictions: it is a leader in biofuels and hydropower, yet it is also expanding oil output aggressively. Petrobras, the state-controlled oil major, has committed $111 billion in spending through 2029—$77 billion of which is earmarked for oil and gas exploration and production. The company recently hit record operated output of 4.19 million boe/d in Q2 2025, but has disappointed investors by holding back dividends to fund this expansion.

Brazil’s government has made no secret that higher oil revenues will help fund social programs and even parts of the energy transition. President Lula da Silva argues that emissions reductions require investment—some of which must come from Brazil’s deepwater riches.

At the same time, Brazil has positioned itself carefully within producer alliances. In early 2025 it joined OPEC+, but on non-binding terms that exempt it from production cut quotas. The move gave Brasília a seat at the table while preserving its freedom to chase a 5.4 million bpd production target by 2030.

The IEA accession bid reflects Brazil’s other face: the climate leader that will host COP30 and touts its renewables-heavy power grid. Solar has surged, nuclear is expanding, and biofuels remain central. For Fatih Birol, the IEA’s executive director, Brazil is “a cornerstone of the global energy system today and its importance is only set to increase.”

That dual identity—climate champion and oil growth engine—will shape Brazil’s role inside the IEA. Membership, if approved, would tie the country more tightly into international cooperation on energy security and transitions, even as Petrobras drills deeper into the pre-salt.

By Julianne Geiger for Oilprice.com

Iran Rejects GCC Claims Over Disputed Islands and Gas Field

GCC IS SAUDI ARABIA AND ITS CLIENT STATES


By Charles Kennedy - Sep 03, 2025

Iran has struck back at claims from the Gulf Cooperation Council on the ownership of three islands in the Persian Gulf and an offshore gas field.

The Iranian Foreign Ministry said in a statement that the islands Abu Musa, Greater Tunb, and Lesser Tunb were sovereign Iranian territory and so was the Arash gas field, calling the claims made earlier this week “hackneyed and legally baseless”.

The Arash gas field, called Dorra by the Arab Gulf states, is a disputed asset between Iran and Kuwait. It was discovered in the 1960s, on the edge of Kuwait’s eastern maritime border. Iran says the field extends into its territorial waters and claims partial ownership. The estimated reserves in the field stand at some 220 billion cubic meters but exploration has been hindered by the long-running dispute.

In July, Kuwait said it had started construction of an onshore gas processing plant to be fed from the Dorra field. Reports in Arab media described the field as located in the neutral zone between Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. The two signed a joint development deal for the field in 2022. In its Monday statement, the Gulf Cooperation Council said the islands were Kuwaiti territory occupied by Iran and the Dorra field was entirely Kuwaiti property.

The GCC “confirmed that the Al Durra field is located entirely within the maritime areas of the State of Kuwait and that the ownership of the natural resources in the partitioned submerged area adjacent to the Saudi-Kuwaiti partitioned zone, including the entire Al Durra field, is a joint ownership between the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the State of Kuwait only.”

In its response, the Iranian side rejected what it called “one-sided claims” by Kuwait and called for “bilateral dialogue, joint efforts, and a positive, constructive atmosphere”.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com

 

Miners Dig Through Yesterday’s Waste to Find Tomorrow’s Metals

  • The mining industry is exploring alternative methods like recycling and re-mining waste tailings to secure essential metals for the energy transition due to challenges in traditional mining investments.

  • Significant amounts of valuable metals, particularly copper, can be recovered from mining waste, with some companies already investigating or investing in reprocessing plants.

  • While re-mining offers a promising solution for material security and waste reduction, its widespread adoption depends on developing cost-effective technologies and favorable market prices for recovered metals.

The mining industry is instrumental for securing the metals necessary for a transition to a more electricity-heavy energy system in the future. It has also been struggling with finding the motivation to invest in these metals. The paradoxical situation has stimulated an alternative approach: recycling and re-mining.

“I genuinely don’t see where all of this copper is going to come from at this point in time.” The observation was made by Anglo American’s chief executive, Duncan Winblad, to Bloomberg three years ago, referring to the projected huge amount of basic metal needed to advance the transition to net zero emissions in accordance with Paris Agreement targets.

But this is not the only thing Winblad told Bloomberg in that 2022 interview. He also said that “There are lots of copper resources in the world, and I think those resources could be brought to book, but the length of time it takes is completely under-appreciated by the market.”

Indeed, the long lead times in mining are the biggest obstacle on the net-zero course. The market has developed some appreciation of the fact, but copper prices still don’t motivate large-scale greenfield investments. So some miners are turning to alternative approaches to sourcing basic metals.

One of these approaches is re-mining, or recovering metals from tailings. Tailings is a nice name for waste—more specifically and importantly, mining waste. This waste contains certain amounts of metals that, according to some in the industry, can be recovered and used in the same way that the primary mined metals are used. These amounts of waste metals can be quite considerable and worth recovering.

According to the German research outlet Fraunhofer Institute, there is as much as 100 million tons of copper sitting in tailings dams from copper mining between 1910 and 2010. The current rate of tailings production is a sizable 7 billion tons annually. The metal content in the tailings is tiny, at between 0.1% and 0.5% for older mines and less than 0.1% for modern ones, but some argue that recovering metal content may be worth it to secure the copper that the energy transition needs.

Reuters’ Andy Home reported last week that some companies are indeed studying the commercial viability of metal recovery from tailings. These include Hudbay Minerals, which is considering copper recovery from the Flin Flon mine, which closed in 2022 but contains a lot of copper and zinc that is recoverable.

Another company, Australian Cobalt Blue Holdings, is considering a similar project for pyrite tailings as a source of sulfur to be tapped after the closure of a local copper smelter that is currently producing the chemical.

Yet another company, Hindustan Zinc, recently approved an actual investment in metals recovery from tailings for a zinc mine. The investment will be used to build a reprocessing plant with a capacity of 10 million tons per year. The Rampura Agucha is the world’s biggest zinc mine.

Re-mining certainly sounds like something that makes sense, especially in the context of a push towards what proponents call a circular economy, with a twin focus on securing necessary materials while keeping waste to a minimum. The problem seems to be technology. To make the extraction of residual metals from tailings economical, the cost of the process must be low enough to ensure its profitability.

The price of copper on international markets is not an incentive right now. It has remained stubbornly low despite projections of soaring demand and shortages. So, while re-mining sounds promising, it may be a while yet before we see tailing dams getting drained and their residual metal contents sucked out and used to manufacture copper wire. 

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com 

U.S. Utilities Are Baffled by Phantom Data Centers

  • US electric utilities are struggling to accurately forecast future power demand due to numerous speculative data center interconnection requests that may not materialize.

  • The practice of AI-focused tech groups filing power requests with multiple utilities for a single potential data center project creates "phantom" demand, making accurate capacity planning difficult.

  • Overestimating demand could lead to utilities overbuilding new capacity, potentially at the expense of American ratepayers who are already experiencing rising electricity prices.


America’s electric utilities are preparing for the surge in electricity demand coming with the data centers powering AI. Utilities have increased investments as they see unprecedented demand growth in the coming years after two decades of flat U.S. electricity consumption.   

But they are grappling with increased levels of uncertainty because not all requests for interconnection they receive will materialize in actual data centers, necessitating electricity supply.  

Phantom Data Centers

Hyperscalers and AI-focused tech groups are sounding out the utilities in the areas they are considering for future data centers, and are filing requests for interconnection of one data center with several utilities in several areas. 

The huge number of requests does not paint an accurate—or full—picture of the power needs of the technology giants because companies tend to inquire about data center power supply with at least three utilities in different areas. 

Of these three requests for new power capacity, only one will become a project for which agreements will be signed. Analysts and utilities cannot reliably say how much new capacity is needed, considering that one data center project pitches electricity supply requests to different utilities in different states.

After one site is picked, all the other previously proposed locations – and the interconnections – will never be built. These would be “phantom” data centers, which will never see the light of day, but which are currently haunting the projections and plans of the U.S. utilities. 

So, electric utilities face a high degree of uncertainty over future revenues as the boom of AI data centers generates widely varying forecasts of peak demand in many areas across the country. 

If utilities overestimate their future demand, they risk overbuilding new capacity that will not be met by consumption. A possible overbuild would come at the expense of the American ratepayers, who have already seen electricity prices rising at a faster pace than U.S. inflation over the past three years.

Puzzled Utilities  

The phantom data centers and the speculative projects are making projections difficult for utilities. 

For example, Sempra’s Texas-based utility Oncor said its active large commercial and industrial (LC&I) interconnection queue as of June 30, 2025, was about 38% higher than at the same time last year. As of June 30, Oncor’s active LC&I interconnection queue had 552 requests, which includes approximately 186 gigawatts (GW) from data centers and over 19 GW of load from diverse industrial sectors. 

American Electric Power Company, which serves over 5 million customers in 11 states, said it now has 24 GW of firm customer commitments for incremental load by the end of the decade, up from 21 GW previously, thanks to data center growth, reshoring, and manufacturing.

“Beyond the 24 gigawatts, customers are also actively seeking to connect approximately 190 gigawatts of additional load to our system. This is five times our current system size of 37 gigawatts,” AEP president and CEO William J. Fehrman said on the Q2 earnings call. 

U.S. power utilities are investing a record amount of money into transmission and grid connection. But current forecasts of AI-driven power demand vary so much that there is a massive margin of error, analysts and utility officials told Reuters Events in June.

The U.S. market faces “a moment of peak uncertainty,” according to Rebecca Carroll, Senior Director of Market Analytics at energy advisor Trio.

The latest report from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) puts data center consumption at anywhere between 6.7% and 12% of total U.S. electricity by 2028.

“The report estimates that data center load growth has tripled over the past decade and is projected to double or triple by 2028,” DOE said.

However, there is a huge difference between double or triple growth in data center load.

This has prompted utilities to demand clear demand estimates from data centers for future connections and power purchase agreements (PPAs), to reduce the risk of getting demand and/or prices wrong.

AI Drives U.S. Power Demand Growth

“We know not all of that is going to come online, but even a fraction of that is significant,” AEP’s chief financial officer, Trevor Mihalik, said on the earnings call.  

U.S. power utilities have announced billions of dollars in capital plans for the next few years and are getting a lot of requests from commercial users, most notably Big Tech, for new power capacity in many areas next to planned data centers. 

Onshoring of manufacturing activity and AI-related data centers are driving an increase in U.S. electricity consumption, Goldman Sachs said in a report earlier this year. 

U.S. electrical power demand is expected to rise by 2.4% each year through 2030, with AI-related demand accounting for about two-thirds of the incremental power demand in the country, the investment bank said. 

The world’s biggest economy will need all energy sources to ensure power demand is met. Natural gas is the biggest near-term winner of AI advancements, but renewables will also play a key role in powering the data centers of next-generation computing, analysts say. 

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com 

 

AI Energy Demand Is Soaring but Not Because of Consumer Queries

  • Nearly half of U.S. electricity demand growth by 2030 will come from AI-driven data centers, with consumers absorbing higher costs.

  • AI companies provide little to no transparency on energy use or emissions, leaving regulators and consumers in the dark.

  • While AI could eventually offset emissions through innovation, today it is fueling both rising utility bills and climate concerns.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is eating up more and more energy all the time as large language models become increasingly complex and pervasive. In the United States, nearly half of all growth in electricity demand between now and 2030 will come from data centers, driven by the AI boom. But the problem isn’t your daily queries to ChatGPT – it’s indiscriminate AI integration in technologies and services that are far outside the end-users' control. Yet, it’s consumers who are footing the bill for soaring energy demand. 

We don’t know exactly how much energy large language models are consuming, because AI companies aren’t required to disclose the information. As a result, the vast majority of them do not, and the sector is characterized by opacity when it comes to environmental impact. As of May, 84 percent of all large language model traffic was conducted on AI models with zero environmental disclosure. While many researchers are trying to calculate AI’s energy footprint, it’s a difficult task – especially because models are changing all the time, generating shifts in terms of both increased complexity and increased efficiency. 

“It blows my mind that you can buy a car and know how many miles per gallon it consumes, yet we use all these AI tools every day and we have absolutely no efficiency metrics, emissions factors, nothing,” says Sasha Luccioni, climate lead at an AI company called Hugging Face. “It’s not mandated, it’s not regulatory. Given where we are with the climate crisis, it should be top of the agenda for regulators everywhere,” she went on to say.

But while we don’t know exactly how much energy AI models use, we do know that it’s a lot. “AI’s integration into almost everything from customer service calls to algorithmic “bosses” to warfare is fueling enormous demand,” reports the Washington Post. “Despite dramatic efficiency improvements, pouring those gains back into bigger, hungrier models powered by fossil fuels will create the energy monster we imagine.”

That being said, there are many things that we as consumers do each and every day that contribute far more to global greenhouse emissions. A handful of AI queries per day is negligible compared to other common and under-scrutinized practices. Watching TV and streaming videos on the internet is likely a far greater culprit of energy usage if your lifestyle is anything close to the average American’s. And your work commute is surely generating much more greenhouse gas emissions.

Put simply, the spike in energy demand from AI models is not consumers’ fault – but it is their problem. While tech companies are consuming more and more energy each year to power their AI ambitions, common consumers are footing the bill. Not only are consumers paying the literal price for AI expansion, but they will also have to bear the burden of the sector’s environmental impacts. Silicon Valley's backtracking on climate pledges, for example, will directly impact global communities, whether or not they ever benefit from AI.

"We are witnessing a massive transfer of wealth from residential utility customers to large corporations—data centers and large utilities and their corporate parents, which profit from building additional energy infrastructure," Maryland People's Counsel David Lapp recently told Business Insider. "Utility regulation is failing to protect residential customers, contributing to an energy affordability crisis.”

On the other hand, AI is gaining efficiency all the time and will be instrumental to reshaping global industries, including the energy sector, to be greener. Large language models can help advance technological breakthroughs for significant emissions gains, with noted potential for innovations in batteries and solar power. The International Energy Agency reports that increased emissions from data centers could even eventually be offset if AI is used to lower emissions from other sectors. 

We’re currently in the messy exploration stages of a global transformation, and the up-front costs in terms will be – and already are – high. Training large language models is incredibly energy- and resource-intensive. But as AI advances, we will get much better at learning how to optimize it, and it could be a net benefit – even in terms of emissions – further down the road. But until then, consumers will be paying the price.

By Haley Zaremba for Oilprice.com


 

Video: Meyer Turku in Finland Floats Third Mega Cruise Ship

giaint cruise ship floated
Legend of the Seas was floated and moved forward to the fitting out berth (Royal Caribbean)

Published Sep 2, 2025 4:03 PM by The Maritime Executive

 

 

Meyer Turk in Finland marked the next milestone as it continues at pace in the shipbuilding project for the world’s largest cruise ships. The third vessel, which is named Legend of the Seas, was floated in the assembly dock on August 29 and has now been moved forward to the fitting out berth. 

This latest achievement came just seven weeks after the delivery of the second cruise ship of the class, Star of the Seas. The third ship was being moved to her fitting out berth as the second ship started its first commercial cruise after a series of preview trips from Port Canaveral, Florida.

The floating of the new ship comes after all the structural elements of the assembly are completed and includes ceremonial elements, starting with the firing of a historic cannon to commence the floating.  The actual floating takes nearly 12 hours to lift the 248,663 gross ton cruise ship. Measuring 1,196 feet (364 meters), the cruise ship is nearly the length of the assembly dry dock. After the ship is floated, they open the massive doors on the front of the dock and use tugs to pull the ship forward.

 


"Legend of the Seas continues the state-of-the-art Icon Class, which allows the Finnish maritime industry to showcase its unique expertise at its best,” said Casimir Lindholm, CEO of Meyer Turku. “The shipyard, Royal Caribbean, and an extensive network of partners work together to develop the processes and concepts from ship to ship. Alongside its sister ships, Legend of the Seas will also mark an important milestone in increasingly responsible shipbuilding.”

The ship, like her sisters, is outfitted with a broad range of amusements and attractions for passengers, ranging from an infinity swimming pool and water slides to the massive glass Aqua Dome entertainment venue above the bridge the ship and a range of dining options. The ship, when completed, will have over 2,800 passenger cabins and suites able to accommodate approximately 6,700 passengers and 2,350 crew when full. The Legend of the Seas is due to enter service for Royal Caribbean International in the summer of 2026, first in the Mediterranean and then repositioning for cruises ot the Caribbean.

Like her two sister ships and the Oasis class Utopia of the SeasLegend of the Seas will be fueled by LNG. It has other technologies, including waste heat recovery systems and shore power connections, to its environmental impact.

The pace of construction will continue at Meyer Turku with the first blocks of the fourth ship of the class expected to be placed into the assembly dock in the coming weeks. Royal Caribbean Group ordered the fourth ship in August 2024 for delivery in 2027. The company also has unexercised options with Meyer Turku for a potential fifth and sixth ship of the class.

The cruise industry is pushing forward to build more cruise ships exceeding the 200,000 gross ton size. Royal Caribbean has also ordered an additional Oasis class cruise ship (236,473 gross tons) from Chantiers de l’Atlantique, while MSC Cruises has also ordered four more of its World class cruise ships (215,000 gross tons) from the French yard. This week, Disney Cruise Line’s Disney Adventure (206,500 gross tons) began sea trials ahead of her entry into service in December. Carnival Cruise Line has ordered three cruise ships for its Project Ace (230,000 gross tons), which will be built at Fincantieri, starting delivery in 2029, and Norwegian Cruise Line has ordered four 227,000 gross ton cruise also to be built by Fincantieri for delivery starting in 2030.

 

Advanced Battery Technologies Can Support Integration of Alternative Fuels

ABS

Published Sep 2, 2025 9:13 PM by The Maritime Executive

 

[By: ABS]

The latest advances in battery technologies have the potential to not only support direct electrification and the integration of alternative fuels but also offer pathways to enhance operational efficiency and reduce fuel costs according to the latest industry-leading analysis from ABS.

Emerging Battery Technologies in the Maritime Industry Volume II deepens industry understanding of the inherent safety risks associated with emerging battery systems, particularly thermal runaway (TR) and gas emissions.

The report also delivers actionable insights to guide the safe implementation and development of comprehensive safety strategies and is intended as a critical resource for operators looking to incorporate advanced battery technologies into their fleets.

“Batteries offer tangible benefits in marine and offshore operations, supporting advancements in efficiency, regulatory compliance and emission reduction. The challenges are primarily due to the developing comprehension of TR behavior, the need for wider research on gas generation and explosion hazards, and the lack of a robust safety management strategy for large-scale applications. At ABS, we are proud to offer the latest insights into fire safety strategies and the safe integration of current and advanced battery technologies,” said Michael Kei, ABS Vice President, Technology.

The study explores the latest advancements in technologies including lithium-ion (Li-ion) and six, next-generation batteries, evaluating the maturity, benefits and challenges of energy storage systems for marine and offshore applications.

ABS offers industry-leading guidance on alternative hybrid electrical technologies and certifications for the operation and installation of these technologies on vessels. Learn more here. Download a copy of the ABS Emerging Battery Technologies in the Maritime Industry Volume 2 here, and find volume one here.

The products and services herein described in this press release are not endorsed by The Maritime Executive.