Monday, October 20, 2025

A Warning from Lebanon

by  | Oct 20, 2025 | 

In not quite one year since the ceasefire deal in Lebanon, Israel has broken the ceasefire 4,600 times. It has killed hundreds of people, including infants, demolished tens of thousands of homes and annexed five areas of Lebanon. It was supposed to withdraw completely.

This situation is being replicated in detail in Gaza. In particular, the ceasefire in Lebanon is “guaranteed” by the USA and France and overseen by an international committee referred to as “the Mechanism”. The “Mechanism” is chaired by the USA. Accordingly the guarantors have refused to acknowledge a single breach of the ceasefire because the US-controlled “Mechanism” calls them counter-terrorist operations aimed at disarming Hezbollah.

The United Nations defers to “the Mechanism” and thus to the USA, and the presence of UN peacekeeping troops in Southern Lebanon is therefore useless. Lebanon is now under control of the US/Israeli puppet administration of General Aoun and effectively being run by US Special Envoy Tom Barrack.

Barrack stated that the borders of Israel and Syria are meaningless and that “Israel will go where they want, when they want, and do what they want to protect the Israelis and their border to make sure on October 7th it never happens again”. This is from the “guarantor” of the Lebanese ceasefire agreement.

There can be no doubt that Trump’s US-chaired “Board of Peace” for Gaza will take exactly the same line as “the Mechanism” in Lebanon. It is axiomatic that Israel will never honor any agreement. They never have.

What we know from Lebanon is not just that the Israelis will break any agreement, but that the American “guarantors” will support their continued violence as “counter-terrorism”. While the Gaza peacekeeping force may not be UN blue-helmeted, it will also almost certainly have terms of engagement that defer to the US-chaired “Board of Peace”.

Back in February I discussed the failure of the Lebanese ceasefire agreement with the UN spokesman in Lebanon, and the primacy of the “Mechanism”. In light of the Gaza agreement negotiations, it is worth revisiting that interview.

Hamas were right to enter the ceasefire negotiations and the prisoner exchange is a good thing. I am not supportive of Hamas’s policy of taking prisoners, other than active service personnel, and I do not believe it has done their cause any good these last two years, particularly as Israel had taken more hostages than they have released in exchanges. The “hostage” narrative, however twisted and unfair, has muddied the waters and hurt the Palestinians. So I shall be pleased to see the end of that phase, and of course welcome the release of Palestinians.

Israel will still hold over 9,000 Palestinian hostages after the releases, and possibly many more.

I will not go through the 20 points of the Agreement, all of which are just headings requiring the substance. But the Israeli military withdrawal from Gaza is of course fundamental, and entirely obscure in its timing and completeness. The “first stage” still leaves the Israeli military in over 60% of Gaza.

Netanyahu has made plain to the Israeli public that he has no intention of the Israeli military leaving Gaza, or of agreeing to a Palestinian state. That this agreement is a phoney is not hidden at all – Israel is not pretending it will honour it.

But if the process gets three things into Gaza – food, journalists and peacekeepers – that will be a major improvement. I do not think you should underestimate the impact on world opinion once journalists can actually get into Gaza, witness the destruction and interview people. There is nobody more cynical than I about the mainstream media, but they are not going to be able to prevent the truth from bleeding into their coverage.

The victory for Palestine will take a few years. Israel is now a pariah state in the eyes of the majority of the inhabitants of this globe, and that will accelerate. Hamas are negotiating from a position of weakness, it is true. We are apparently going to see formal colonialism restored in Gaza for a while. There is more pain to be endured. But the balance is shifting.

I have two quotes for you, one from the West and one from the East.

The mills of God grind slowly, but they grind exceeding small.

They plan, and they plan, but Allah is the best of planners.

Craig Murray is an author, broadcaster, human rights activist, and former diplomat. He was British Ambassador to Uzbekistan from August 2002 to October 2004 and Rector of the University of Dundee from 2007 to 2010. The article is reprinted with permission from his website.

'We're going to go': Trump threatens sending National Guard to San Francisco on Fox News

THE CITY IS TOO WOKE AND TOO D.E.I.

Robert Davis
October 19, 2025 
RAW STORY


U.S. President Donald Trump points a finger as he speaks during a roundtable on antifa, an anti-fascist movement he designated a domestic "terrorist organization" via executive order on September 22, at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., October 8, 2025. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

President Donald Trump threatened to send National Guard troops to San Francisco during an interview on Fox News on Sunday, according to a new report.

The New York Times reported that Trump reiterated the threat during an interview on the Fox News program “Sunday Morning Futures" with host Maria Bartiromo. His comments come at a time when the administration is deploying troops to several Democratic-run cities such as Los Angeles, Memphis, and Chicago.

“We’re going to go to San Francisco. The difference is I think they want us in San Francisco,” Trump told Bartiromo on her show.

“San Francisco was truly one of the great cities of the world. And then 15 years ago it went wrong, it went woke,” he said. He added that, “We’re going to make it great.”

Trump appeared to be referencing to comments from Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff, who told The New York Times last week that San Francisco doesn't "have enough cops, so if they can be cops, I’m all for it,."

Benioff apologized for the comments on Friday.

“Having listened closely to my fellow San Franciscans and our local officials, and after the largest and safest Dreamforce in our history, I do not believe the National Guard is needed to address safety in San Francisco,” Benioff wrote in a post on X.

Read the entire report by clicking here.


SAN FRANSISCO NIGHTS THE ANIMALS

CONCENTRATION MOON FRANK ZAPPA



'Nobody Wants You Here': Gavin Newsom Hits Trump With A Scathing 'Fact Check'

Ed Mazza
Mon, October 20, 2025 
HUFFPOST

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Sunday fired back at President Donald Trump for once again threatening to send the National Guard into San Francisco.

“We’re gonna go to San Francisco,” Trump said during a Fox News interview. “The difference [from Chicago] is, I think they want us in San Francisco.”

Politics: Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Ups The Ante As He Calls For A General Strike

Newsom wasn’t having it.

“Fact check: Nobody wants you here,” Newsom wrote on X. “You will ruin one of America’s greatest cities.

In an awkward moment during the same interview, Trump accidentally praised Newsom.

He said San Francisco was “truly one of the great cities of the world,” but “went wrong” 15 years ago.

Newsom served as mayor of San Francisco starting in 2004, leaving office in early 2011 ― or almost exactly 15 years ago.


Gavin Newsom speaks with Donald Trump in January 2025. MANDEL NGAN via Getty Images

When Trump threatened to send troops to San Francisco earlier this month, at least one local business leader welcomed the idea... at first.

Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff, once a Hillary Clinton donor, said the city doesn’t have enough police officers and he supported Trump’s plan.

Politics: Gavin Newsom Delivers Grim Predictions About Donald Trump’s Next Move

“I fully support the president,” he told The New York Times. “I think he’s doing a great job.”

The comments caused venture capitalist Ron Conway to quit the board of the Salesforce Foundation, the company’s charitable organization, saying “I now barely recognize the person I have so long admired.”

Benioff later apologized, saying his comments were made “out of an abundance of caution.”

“Having listened closely to my fellow San Franciscans and our local officials, and after the largest and safest Dreamforce in our history, I do not believe the National Guard is needed to address safety in San Francisco,” he wrote on X.

He also said his company would give the city $1 million to use as signing bonuses to hire new police officers.


Members of the Texas National Guard assemble in Elwood, Illinois, at the Army Reserve Training Center in the southwest suburb of Chicago, on Tuesday, Oct. 7. 2025. (Brian Cassella/Chicago Tribune/Tribune News Service via Getty Images) Chicago Tribune via Getty ImagesMore

Trump has sent the National Guard into multiple cities ostensibly due to high crime rates, calling Chicago, for example, a “hellhole” of crime. He’s also threatened to send troops into additional cities, including San Francisco.

However, critics say he’s targeting cities with Democratic leaders in Democratic states, while ignoring high-crime cities and states with Republican leaders.

Politics: Karoline Leavitt’s ‘Incredibly Dangerous’ Rant About Democrats Draws Instant Backlash

Some of the cities he has threatened actually have declining crime rates. Newsom shared one report that finds San Francisco’s homicide rate is on track for its lowest level since the 1950s.

Trump likewise sent troops into Washington, D.C. claiming the city’s crime numbers “get worse” and the situation is “totally out of control.”

However, the city’s crime rate is actually falling.

Trump claims ‘unquestioned power' to deploy troops to San Francisco under Insurrection Act

Aidin Vaziri
San Francisco Chronicle
Sun, October 19, 2025 


President Donald Trump said in a Fox News interview that he has "unquestioned power" to deploy the National Guard to U.S. cities and that San Francisco is "next." (Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/Tribune News Service)

President Donald Trump said he has "unquestioned power" to deploy the National Guard and reaffirmed that San Francisco will be the next city to face federal intervention.

In an interview that aired Sunday on Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures," Trump floated invoking the Insurrection Act - a centuries-old law that allows presidents to deploy troops on U.S. soil.

"Don't forget I can use the Insurrection Act," he said. "Fifty percent of the presidents almost have used that. And that's unquestioned power. I choose not to, but I'm met constantly by fake politicians, politicians that think that they - you know, it's not a part of the radical left movement to have safety. … These cities have to be safe." Only about one-fourth of presidents have invoked the act.

Related: ‘The only solution': Elon Musk backs call to deploy federal troops to San Francisco


Read more: ‘People have had it': No Kings protests inspire Bay Area crowds, exceed expectations

Trump told host Maria Bartiromo that San Francisco is next, setting up another potential showdown with Democratic leaders over presidential authority and local control.

"The difference is, I think they want us in San Francisco," he said. "San Francisco was truly one of the great cities of the world. And then, 15 years ago, it went wrong. It went woke."

Soldiers with the California National Guard and U.S. Marines form a line outside the North Los Angeles Federal Building during the June No Kings protest. (Stephen Lam/S.F. Chronicle)

Trump has already deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles, Memphis, Chicago and Washington, D.C. After a trial in federal court, a judge ruled that the Los Angeles deployment violated the law because troops acted as police, a violation of the Posse Comitatus Act. Federal judges have also blocked his attempt to send troops to Portland, Ore.

Gov. Gavin Newsom was quick to fire back on Sunday.

More in U.S.

A Video Of Obama Exposing How He Thinks MAGA Would React If He Sent Troops To Red States Is Going Viral, And It's A Startling Reminder Of The Double Standard
BuzzFeed1.8K


"Fact check: Nobody wants you here," he wrote on X. "You will ruin one of America's greatest cities."

Trump's comments came amid a separate legal battle over his administration's attempt to deploy National Guard troops to Chicago. A federal judge temporarily blocked that move, ruling there was no evidence of a "danger of rebellion."

The White House has appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that the decision "impinges on the president's authority."

National Guard soldiers stand by Friday as visitors check out the Ellipse in Washington, with the White House in the background. (Rahmat Gul/Associated Press)




In San Francisco, local officials have already made clear they don't want federal troops in the city. Mayor Daniel Lurie said last week that the city's police department is seeing progress in both recruitment and crime reduction.

"We have a lot of work to do, but I trust our local law enforcement," Lurie said at a police academy news conference on Wednesday. "We in San Francisco are doing the work each and every day."

District Attorney Brooke Jenkins said city leaders "have this issue under control" and criticized the idea of federal troops as "resources being imposed upon our communities."

Prominent tech figures have urged federal intervention in San Francisco. Elon Musk and investor David Sacks backed sending in federal forces, and Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff initially echoed the idea before walking it back and pledging $1 million to support larger hiring bonuses for new police officers.

The Posse Comitatus Act bars using federally controlled troops - including a federalized National Guard - as local police. Only a formal Insurrection Act declaration creates a narrow exception for domestic law enforcement in extraordinary circumstances.

Trump's remarks follow a series of actions directed at Democratic-led cities.

On Friday, the White House announced it would pause $11 billion in infrastructure projects in places such as San Francisco, New York and Baltimore, citing budget constraints. Critics called the move an act of political retaliation.


National Guard soldiers conduct a community safety patrol at Tom Lee Park in Memphis last Sunday. (George Walker IV/Associated Press)

Meanwhile, No Kings protests drew millions nationwide Saturday.

In response, Trump shared an AI-generated video depicting himself as "King Trump" flying a jet that dumps brown sludge resembling feces over demonstrators.

Newsom wrote in a separate post: "7 million Americans turned out yesterday to peacefully protest a monarchy. It was the biggest protest the country has ever seen. And despite the GOP's best efforts to sow hatred and chaos, you stood firm in peace and unity. That's what real patriotism looks like."

Asked about the ongoing demonstrations by NPR, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson responded: "Who cares?"

This article originally published at Trump claims ‘unquestioned power' to deploy troops to San Francisco under Insurrection Act.


Trump says government will send National Guard troops to San Francisco

John Krinjak
Sun, October 19, 2025 

The Brief

In an interview on FOX Sunday, Pres. Donald Trump suggested that San Francisco may be the next city to see a deployment of National Guard troops.


Trump claimed in the interview that "I think they want us in San Francisco," something which many officials and residents dispute.


Trump claims he can use the Insurrection Act to deploy the Guard, but experts say there will be legal roadblocks for the administration.

SAN FRANCISCO, Calif. - On Sunday, President Donald Trump again threatened to send National Guard troops to San Francisco, and says he may invoke the Insurrection Act to do it.

Trump even suggested residents want the troops, a comment that did not go well with many across the city. Meanwhile, any timeline for a potential deployment remains unclear.
"We're going to do San Francisco."

In an interview on the FOX News show "Sunday Morning Futures", Trump spoke about his deployment of National Guard troops to Chicago – and suggested again that San Francisco might be next.

Host Maria Bartiromo asked Trump a direct question: "Are you going to San Francisco next?"

Trump responded, "We're going to go to San Francisco. The difference is I think they want us in San Francisco. San Francisco was truly one of the great cities of the world. And then 15 years ago it went wrong. It went woke."
"San Franciscans don't want him."

But Democratic State Senator Scott Wiener of San Francisco took issue Sunday with those claims.

"First of all, San Franciscans don't want him to send his personal army to occupy and invade San Francisco. We don't want that. So he needs to go away, back off. But we also know that he hates San Francisco, he hates what we represent because we support immigrants, we support LGBTQ people," said Wiener.

Trump claims that he can use the Insurrection Act to deploy the National Guard.

The backstory

All this comes after Salesforce CEO Mark Benioff suggested troops could help with San Francisco Police shortages.

Benioff later walked back those comments, with Mayor Daniel Lurie underscoring that SFPD has the situation handled.

"We have seen crime go down in Union Square 40 percent. Crime city-wide is down 30 percent. We are at 70-year lows when it comes to homicides," said Lurie.

More in U.S.

Best signs and costumes from the nationwide ‘No Kings’ protests condemning the Trump administration
The Independent

"The city's putting their best effort in to make sure that it is safe around here. You see SFPD roaming around," said Richard Soriano, who opposes the National Guard being deployed to San Francisco.

Despite those counterarguments, Trump is doubling down.

"We're going to go to San Francisco, and we're going to make it great. We're going to make it great. It'll be great again. San Francisco is a great city. It won't be great if it keeps going like this," Trump said in the FOX News interview.
How will this play out? Expert weighs in

"I think it'll be the same as it was in Portland, the same as it was in Chicago: two different courts, and they both said that the facts on the ground do not add up to the facts necessary to invoke Section 10 of the US Code or the Insurrection Act," said Steve Woolpert, professor emeritus of politics at St. Mary's College of California.
"Nobody that lives here wants it."

People we spoke to in Union Square say the National Guard can stay away from their city by the bay.

"I don't think anybody in San Francisco actually wants it. Nobody that lives here wants it. It's just a political stunt and makes him feel good," said Ashley Brand, who opposes the National Guard in San Francisco.

"Our new mayor is great and he's doing a great job, and San Franciscans are out and about. I'm sorry, it's absurd. It's just distraction," said Jeanne Himy of San Francisco. "I don't feel unsafe here. And I'm an old lady, you know.

Trump claims he has "unquestioned power" to deploy troops to San Francisco under the Insurrection Act.

Experts say any legal battle over all this would likely end up at the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Source

Interview with Pres. Trump on FOX News, interviews by KTVU reporter John Krinjak, and previous reporting





Trump promises to deploy troops to SF: 'We're going to go to San Francisco'

Gabe Lehman
Sun, October 19, 2025 


U.S. President Donald Trump answers questions from reporters after signing a Presidential Memorandum in the Oval Office on September 15, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

President Donald Trump reiterated his intention to deploy National Guard troops to San Francisco on Sunday, going as far as claiming he may invoke the Insurrection Act if needed.

Speaking to Fox News' Maria Bartiromo in an interview pubbed on Oct. 19, the president said in no uncertain terms that he was planning to send troops to San Francisco.

"We're going to go to San Francisco," Trump said in an interview for the "Sunday Morning Futures" show. "The difference (as opposed to Chicago) is, I think they want us in San Francisco. San Francisco was truly one of the great cities of the world, and then 15 years ago, it went wrong. It went woke.

"Our cities that are Democrat-run - exclusively just about - are unsafe cities. They're a disaster, and I'm going to save the cities," Trump said.

National Guard troops have already been deployed in United States cities including Los Angeles and Chicago. Trump has also stated his intent to send troops to Portland, Ore., but a judge has blocked their deployment so far. The president's most recent comments come a day after Americans took to the streets in massive numbers for "No Kings" protests in the Bay Area and across the country.

Trump also broached invoking the Insurrection Act, a rarely used but extremely powerful presidential tool that allows the president to use military force within the United States and against Americans.

"And don't forget, and I haven't used it, but don't forget. I can use the Insurrection Act. 50% of the presidents, almost, have used that, and that's unquestioned power," Trump said.

According to the Brennan Center, the Insurrection Act can be used "to suppress rebellion or domestic violence or to enforce the law in certain situations." It has been invoked 30 times in the country's history, most recently in 1992 during the Rodney King riots in Los Angeles.

Trump's threats to send National Guard troops to San Francisco have already stirred controversy. In the leadup to Salesforce's Dreamforce convention, company CEO Mark Benioff, a longtime Democratic supporter, said he supported Trump's plan and welcomed the idea of sending troops to San Francisco. Backlash to the comments was swift and Benioff eventually issued an apology on Friday.

More in U.S.

‘No Kings’ rally in downtown Chicago draws more than 100,000 protesters: ‘You fight for the people’
Chicago Tribune

"My earlier comment came from an abundance of caution around the event, and I sincerely apologize for the concern it caused," Benioff wrote on X.com. "Having listened closely to my fellow San Franciscans and our local officials, and after the largest and safest Dreamforce in our history, I do not believe the National Guard is needed to address safety in San Francisco."

Despite Benioff's reversal, the conversation around a possible National Guard deployment in San Francisco is clearly intensifying.

This article originally published at Trump promises to deploy troops to SF: 'We're going to go to San Francisco'.


Trump mulls invoking the Insurrection Act and signals he’ll send troops to San Francisco

John Bowden
Sun, October 19, 2025 
THE INDEPENDENT


President Donald Trump strongly suggested that he was preparing to use the Insurrection Act to crack down on dissent nationwide in an interview Sunday while warning that National Guard deployments would take place in San Francisco next.

He spoke in a pre-recorded discussion that aired Sunday on Fox News’s Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo about using the power of the federal government to militarize the National Guard in states where he and his team claim that Democratic officials are refusing to cooperate with federal law enforcement and crime-fighting efforts, including the White House’s mass deportation campaign.

During the conversation, he falsely asserted that nearly half of all U.S. presidents have invoked the act. Fifteen U.S. presidents have invoked the Insurrection Act (out of 45 men to hold the position in total).


“Don’t forget, and I haven’t used it, but don’t forget: I can use the Insurrection Act. 50 percent of the presidents, almost, have used that. And that's unquestioned power,” the president told Bartiromo, before making a somewhat garbled point about Democratic state officials: “I choose not to. I’d rather do this [without invoking it]. But I’m met constantly by fake politicians, politicians that think that they – you know, it’s not a part of the radical left movement to have safety.”

He also confirmed that he was imminently planning to send National Guard troops to San Francisco, while describing himself as “the chief law enforcement officer of the United States.”



Donald Trump said that crime in San Francisco was out of control, even though it's at a 20-year-low overall (AFP via Getty Images)

“San Francisco was truly one of the great cities of the world, and then 15 years ago, it went wrong. It went woke,” said the president. “But we’re going to go to San Francisco, and we’re going to make it great.”

The city, which is experiencing a 20-year low in its overall crime rate, has areas where crime and issues including drug use and homelessness are persistent problems such as the famous Tenderloin district. In 2023, according to city statistics, the Tenderloin district averaged more than four calls reporting violent crimes per day. Rates of violent and non-violent crime have fallen in the district, but still remain higher than in surrounding areas for the most part.

By sending troops to San Francisco, Trump would once again be putting himself in direct conflict with Gavin Newsom, California’s Democratic governor. Newsom, who is a leading possible contender for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination, challenged the president in the courts after Trump used National Guard forces to protect ICE agents and detention centers in Los Angeles earlier this year.

“California will resist any effort by Donald Trump to militarize another American city for his own vanity and deranged fantasies,” a spokesperson for the governor told Politico in a statement. “California doesn’t want or need the National Guard to police its streets. In this state, we take care of our own communities—unlike Trump who can’t even pay the soldiers under his command.”


Gavin Newsom halted Trump’s use of the National Guard in Los Angeles earlier this year (AP)

The White House and Department of Justice have battled state leaders in the courts over the efforts to expand Trump’s National Guard deployments. The president deployed troops to Memphis with the support of the state’s Republican governor, and has battled with Democratic leaders in Illinois and Oregon over sending troops to Chicago and Portland.

A senior Border Patrol official tweeted that criminal organizations were allegedly plotting to “kidnap and kill law enforcement officers” in cities like Chicago, while Attorney General Pam Bondi told a Senate panel earlier this month that the deployments were necessary to protect ICE facilities.

San Francisco’s mayor hasn’t issued a statement directly responding to the president’s threats, but on Saturday released a video message thanking thousands of city residents who hit the streets as part of nationwide “No Kings” protests against the president.

Millions in cities and towns in every state turned out on Saturday for the demonstrations, which come after months of the Trump administration’s threats to federalize U.S. cities and the growing presence of ICE agents and raids in communities across the country. White House officials cast the demonstrators as far-left radicals and “terrorists” ahead of Saturday’s events. No major acts of violence were reported, despite the massive numbers protesting around the U.S.

The president trolled protesters on Sunday with another AI-generated video depicting him in a fighter jet dropping excrement on crowds in Times Square.








 

Invisible poison: Airborne mercury from gold mining is contaminating African food crops, new study warns




European Geosciences Union

Figure 1 

image: 

Figure 1: Using mercury passive air samplers (MerPAS) to measure gaseous elemental mercury concentrations in and around both ASGM site and farming areas

view more 

Credit: Authors of the publication





In a recent study published today in the European Geosciences Union (EGU) journal Biogeosciences, scientists have confirmed that mercury pollution from artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) is contaminating food crops not through the soil, as previously believed, but directly from the air. Driven by the surging price of gold, which has increased by more than tenfold since 2000, the rapid expansion of unregulated mining in these regions raises urgent questions about food security, human health, and environmental justice

The study, conducted by an international team of scientists led by Excellent O. Eboigbe and David McLagan at Queens University, and Abiodun Odukoya Mary at the University of Lagos, focused on a farming community in Nigeria situated near an artisanal and small-scale gold mining site. The researchers compared crops from a field located 500 meters from the ASGM site with those grown 8 kilometres away. The contrast was striking mercury concentrations in leaves and grains were approximately 10-50 times higher in the farm closer to the mining site.

For decades, scientists have assumed that mercury enters food crops primarily via the roots, after leaching into the soil or water. But this new research, using sophisticated mercury stable isotope analyses, reveals a very different mechanism at work. Most of the mercury found in plant tissues came from the atmosphere, taken up through leaves during photosynthesis. In short: plants are breathing in mercury. David McLagan states that: 

“Mercury uptake by plants from air represents the largest sink of mercury from air to terrestrial [land and freshwater] systems. While this critical ecosystem service helps reduce the amount of mercury being globally redistributed through the atmosphere, it raises human health concerns when it is staple crops that are the mechanism stripping the air of mercury.”  

The research team found that leafy plant parts, which are often consumed by humans and livestock, retained the highest mercury concentrations. Edible, non-leafy parts of the plants, like cassava roots or maize kernels, had lower concentrations yet still showed significant contamination. While levels remained below international mercury consumption thresholds, the authors warn that there could still be health concerns when consuming mercury contaminated crops near ASGM sites, as international standards employed conservative crop consumption rates, and that even greater contamination of air, soils, and crops have been observed in other studies. This is especially relevant in communities dependent on local agriculture for survival.

Used to extract gold from raw ore, Mercury is a powerful neurotoxin. Long-term exposure, even at low levels, can damage the nervous system, impair cognitive development in children, and cause serious cardiovascular and reproductive problems. Due to its frequent use in artisanal and small-scale mining operations, vulnerable populations in low-income rural areas are at higher risk.

" Miners will not stop using mercury for gold extraction unless they get a readily available alternative that is also cost-effective.” Said Odukoya Abiodun Mary

ASGM is now the largest source of mercury emissions globally, according to the UN Environment Programme. Yet regulation and monitoring are limited in many parts of the Global South, where ASGM is often an economic lifeline for communities facing poverty and displacement. This study pushes a critical but overlooked consequence of that boom to the forefront: food systems are being contaminated, quietly and invisibly, by elevated levels of mercury in the air.

The research is also a call to action for governments and international organizations tasked with enforcing the ‘Minamata Convention on Mercury’. Current monitoring strategies focus largely on water bodies, sediment, and seafood, not crops. This study shows those efforts are missing a key vector of exposure.

“Due to the toxicity of bioaccumulation and biomagnification potential of methylmercury, fish consumption in ASGM areas has been a major focus of epidemiological research in ASGM areas. Yet this work demonstrates that there are other dietary sources of mercury, and mercury from these different sources can have cumulative effects.” 

The study concludes that new policies are urgently needed to monitor and mitigate airborne mercury exposure in agricultural regions near mining activities. Considering the rapid growth of artisanal and small-scale gold mining, millions of people across Africa, South America, and Asia may be facing long-term health risks from something as simple and essential as growing and consuming local foods.

Press contact:
Media and Engagement Manager Asmae Ourkiya    
European Geosciences Union
Email: media@egu.eu


About the EGU

The European Geosciences Union (EGU) is Europe’s premier geosciences union, dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the Earth, planetary, and space sciences for the benefit of humanity, worldwide. It is a non-profit interdisciplinary learned association of scientists founded in 2002 with headquarters in Munich, Germany. The EGU publishes a number of diverse scientific journals that use an innovative open access format and organises topical meetings plus education and outreach activities. Its annual General Assembly is the largest and most prominent European geosciences event, attracting more than 20,000 scientists from all over the world. The meeting’s sessions cover a wide range of topics, including volcanology, planetary exploration, the Earth’s internal structure and atmosphere, climate, energy, and resources.

If you wish to receive our press releases via email, please use the Press Release Subscription Form at https://www.egu.eu/news/subscription/. Subscribed journalists and other members of the media receive EGU press releases under embargo (if applicable) 24 hours in advance of public dissemination.

Figure 2: Rudimentary gold extraction method used at this ASGM site and many others across the globe (left) and groundnuts (peanuts), one of the studied crops, collected at a farm adjacent to the ASGM site (right).

Credit

Authors of the publication

MIT scientists uncover traces of Earth's lost ancestor deep beneath surface

Deep rock samples from Greenland, Canada, Hawaii reveal remnants of planet’s 4.5-billion-year-old precursor, offering new insights into Earth’s earliest chemistry



Gizem Nisa Demir | 20.10.2025

​​​​​​​ISTANBUL

Scientists from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and international collaborators have discovered rare remnants of “proto Earth,” the planet’s ancient precursor that existed 4.5 billion years ago.

They offer a glimpse into the material that predated the massive impact that shaped our modern world.

The findings were published Tuesday in Nature Geosciences, according to ScienceDaily.

“This is maybe the first direct evidence that we've preserved the proto Earth materials,” said Nicole Nie, the Paul M. Cook career development assistant professor of Earth and planetary sciences at MIT.

“We see a piece of the very ancient Earth, even before the giant impact. This is amazing because we would expect this very early signature to be slowly erased through Earth's evolution,” he said.

The team identified an unusual chemical signature in deep rock samples from Greenland, Canada and the US state of Hawaii, showing a deficit in the potassium-40 isotope compared to most modern Earth materials.

The anomaly suggests the rocks may contain tiny portions of the proto Earth, surviving billions of years of planetary upheaval, according to the findings released.

Scientists have been trying to understand Earth's original chemical composition by combining the compositions of different groups of meteorites. But our study shows that the current meteorite inventory is not complete, and there is much more to learn about where our planet came from,” Nie explained.