Sunday, November 23, 2025

AMERIKAN GESTAPO
We Go As We Please: What the Fuck Is Wrong With Y’all


Jittery ICE agent in Chicago randomly points weapon at kid in crowd

Photo by Anthony Vazquez/Chicago Sun-Times



Abby Zimet
Nov 19, 2025
COMMON DREAMS


The American Gestapo’s brutish, racist, unholy crusade rampages on. They’ve now left Chicago - trailing tear gas, court losses, manifest lies, the wrath of a people - to terrorize diverse blue Charlotte NC with its “cowardly fascist pigs doing cowardly fascist pig things.” In a new “offense to history,” they even named their latest depravity Operation Charlotte’s Web. its author E.B. White, a stirring voice for democracy and inclusion who decried the “smell” arising from those who “adjust to fascism,” weeps.

Thanks to his big butt-ugly bill’s profane gift of $75 billion to thugs fighting an imaginary invasion of “criminal illegal aliens” and other forms of “domestic terrorism” by brown people, nearly half of FBI agents and countless Homeland Security workers have been pulled off other issues (like homeland security) and reassigned to round up deadly day laborers, taco makers and baby-sitting abuelas - coincidentally and not vengefully at all, mostly in Dem-run cities. Key to keeping the ethnic cleansing program churning is fascist ghoul Stephen Goebbels Miller, who sees every critic or court loss as “legal insurrection” and “domestic terrorist sedition” - what Jan. 6?- against federal government heroes who have immunity no matter their atrocities because, “This campaign of terrorism will be brought down.”

Miller’s fever dreams are echoed in the frenzied white nationalist agit-prop DHS spews to lure thugs to JOIN.ICE.GOV: “America has been invaded by criminals and predators. We need YOU to get them out.” The rhetoric is brown-shirted: “We’re Taking Back America,” “The Enemy Is At the Gates,” “America For Americans,” “We Are Asleep No Longer,” and, from the video game Halo whose villains are zombie parasites, “Destroy the Flood.” They’ve even tossed into their state-sponsored domestic terrorist campaign Teddy Roosevelt’s Rough Riders from the Spanish-American War - “We have room for but one flag, the American flag” - evidently unaware they were famously diverse, from cowboys to elites to Native Americans. George Conway on the brazen language: “It’s hard to Nazi what’s going on here.”

Despite vastly lowering standards and offering $50K bribes, DHS is still struggling to find enough sadists, losers, sexual predators, “pudgy militia stooges” and Marx’ “scum, offal, refuse of all classes” to fill their ranks of bounty hunters. As a result critics, often cops, say it’s clear from videos of wild, ham-fisted abductions, “There’s something off with those guys - they’re out of control.” Many cite operations “built on spectacle, not evidence,” with “a total abrogation of responsibility or training” and illegal practices like chokeholds meant to “send a message of brutality...”They’re just fascist shows of force to satiate the creepy desires of an old man who wants to seem macho.“ In Chicago, those abuses led to multiple court orders to rein them in, and even a call from Mayor Brandon for the UN to investigate them.


Response from a Chicago bounty hunter when a resident began filming him.
Photo from Bluesky

“Operation Midway Blitz,” the terrorizing of Chicago’s brown-skinned population from early September to last week, saw 3,100 people, including U.S. citizens and children, detained, perhaps 1,100 of them deported or agreed to leave, lively communities shrunk to ghost towns, widespread trauma, inspired resistance, and a shitshow of often deranged violence by grossly ill-trained goons. They shot at least 2 people, killing one. They repeatedly, indiscriminately shot rubber bullets, flash-bang grenades, teargas and smoke bombs at protesters, journalists, first responders, pastors, and outside an elementary school. They handcuffed a city alderman at a hospital, pepper-sprayed a one-year-old in the face, beat up and bloodied the people they detained. They undertook 8 car chases that ended in 8 crashes.

In one of their most ludicrous, performative flops, they launched a flamboyant raid on an apartment building allegedly filled with Venezuelan gang members - rappelling from a Black Hawk helicopter, smashing doors, seizing families and crying kids, dragging them into the cold, zip-tying, leading away and slickly videotaping 37 victims in what Goebbels hailed as a counterterrorism victory that “saved God knows how many lives” - except all the drama resulted in zero criminal charges. Again and again, the bombastic cruelty proves both hollow and illegal: In a lawsuit about conditions at Broadview detention facility, a judge “literally ordered DHS to clean up their shit” after agreeing detainees were being held without access to beds, toilets,food, water, counsel, telephones, anything approaching basic humanity.

The malfeasance kept bigly backfiring on them. Last week, another judge, citing “repeated, material violations,” ruled that 614 detainees at Broadview should be released on a $1,500 bond following an earlier class action lawsuit charging their detentions contravened a Biden-era consent decree limiting warrantless arrests; he also barred them from being deported. Of the 614 named, just 16 have criminal records, usually minor, and will not be freed. The other 97.4% were just randomly grabbed and shoved in vans, mostly while working, commuting to or from work, or at Home Depot looking for work, leaving little time for the gang murders they’re alleged to indulge in. Sensibly and hysteria about terrorism notwithstanding, the judge decided it was “highly unlikely” they constitute the infamous “worst of the worst.”

Overseeing much of this hapless carnage is preening, Napoleonic, 5’4“, Nazi-coiffed Greg Bovino, who goes to work ”with a Bowie knife in his belt - it’s all for show.“ Bovino often posted heroic photos of his time in Chicago, like on a Mekong-esque patrol boat - ”Where streets end, our Marine Unit begins“ - and when he slammed a city official to the ground and paraded him around ”like in some kind of masked-domination fantasy reboot of the Battle of Midway and the London Blitz, but where the Nazis were the good guys.“ His contempt for heeding the law is so great that, when he got hauled before another judge in a lawsuit ripping his violence - teargassing students, no body camera, repeatedly lying, ”force (that) shocks the conscience“ - and she issued a restraining order, it took him just days to violate it.

On Friday, ongoing protests at Broadview erupted in scuffles that ended in several injuries and 21 arrests. Among the detainees was Rev. Michael Woolf, pastor at Lake Street Church and one of many faith leaders who’ve long put their bodies out there to decry a “black hole” of a facility, tell those inside “we didn’t forget you,” offer weekly witness “at the picket line, amid the tear gas,” and declare the moment “absolutely a spiritual emergency...We are somewhere in 1930s Germany, and whether the church is going to be silent is being tested.” In this commitment, he joins Catholic bishops, journalists, rights advocates, former federal officials and other critics who’ve blasted the months of mindless brutality, abduction, fear-mongering and gutting of communities. One attorney: “This is not law enforcement. It is terror.”

The Rev. Michael Woolf was slammed to ground at Broadview protest
Photo by Ashlee Rezin/Chicago Sun-Times

Still, Chicago has sought to rise to the challenge. The nation’s third-largest city, with a history of fierce labor activism, it likes to view itself as “a collection of small towns with Midwest sensibilities,” where “people know their neighbors (and) word spreads quickly.” Organizers began building a broad grassroots coalition right after Trump’s election: “We knew what was coming. Trump wants to terrify Chicagoans into submission - we aren’t having it. Mayor Brandon Johnson created an Office of Immigrant, Migrant, and Refugee Rights to strengthen sanctuary protections, declare an ”ICE Free Zone,“ expand access to resources and local groups launched multiple resistance efforts, many in the largely Latino Little Village: Rapid Response teams, neighborhood patrols, ICE-spotting hotline, Know-Your-Rights flyers.

Volunteers escorted kids to school and families dropping them off; for those afraid to go out, they did grocery runs and gave out ride-share gift cards. A West Side group hosted “Whistlemania” events, packing over 17,000 kits with warning whistles, resource guides, tips on what to do if ICE turns up. MigraWatch trained over 2,000 people to monitor raids and tell people their rights. Everyone honked horns. To help often-targeted Latino street vendors - tacos, flowers, candy, tamales - cyclists organized “buy-out” events, emptying stands and delivering the goods to shelters or families in need. Pop-up events raised money for vendors, restaurant crawls helped keep Latino-owned eateries open, students held walkouts, tracked unmarked SUVs, monitored ICE hot spots to keep neighbors safe.

“The strategy here is to make us afraid. Our response is a bunch of obscenities and ‘no,’” said one resident. Of those threatened, she said, “We’re showing we care about them, even if the federal government doesn’t.” Organizers also sought to create a template for other besieged cities to follow - a tactic that’s evidently worked as North Carolina towns face their own “reign of terror.” Tellingly, before leaving, Bovino berated Chicago as “a very non-permissive environment”; weirdly, he then gathered his gang of armed sadists in their masks and fatigues for a photo op by their agit-prop team at Anish Kapoor’s landmark sculpture Cloud Gate, or The Bean; preposterously, because they exist beyond irony, on command they shouted not “cheese” but “Little Village,” the community they’ve been terrorizing.

Saturday, they moved on to Charlotte, which has a black female mayor and black male sheriff; he and four other black sheriffs in the state’s largest counties were all elected on platforms opposing ICE after fierce organizing by immigrants’ groups. DHS said they were “surging“ agents to Charlotte ”to ensure Americans are safe“; they also charged ”sanctuary politicians“ letting alleged criminals ”roam free on American streets“ ”failed to honor“ ICE detainers - so, keep people in prison to not hurt goons’ feelings? Given Charlotte’s diversity, its low crime rate, and Dem Gov. Josh Stein’s charge ICE is just ”stoking fear,“ their arrival was widely deemed ”pure racism and retribution.“ Also, Bovino is from there and attended Western Carolina University before becoming a stormtrooper; his parents, if he had any, must be so proud.

The abuses came fast. En route to work Saturday morning, Willy Aceituno stopped at Pollo Campero to get breakfast; Honduran-born, he’s a U.S. citizen. At the door, he was confronted by thugs for living while brown; he showed his REAL ID, they let him go. Minutes later, in his truck, more thugs; he declined to open his window or answer their questions with, “Why don’t you ask other people? Why just me?” They smashed his window, dragged him out, slammed him to the ground; livid bystanders yelled, “They just I.D.'ed him!”, “Don’t you guys coordinate?”, “This whole thing’s wrong, man!” and “What the fuck is wrong with y’all?” After driving off with him, he later said, they finally looked at his I.D. and let him out of the car; when he asked for a ride back, they told him to get lost or they’d arrest him again.


- YouTube www.youtube.com

Charlotte, meanwhile, grew quiet, with residents “reeling” from the ugly incursion. Protesters marched and chanted, “Fuck Donald Trump”; drivers honked thug warnings; a woman in a car kept yelling, “This is an illegal traffic stop” until nervous goons pointed guns at her. But many restaurants stood empty, street vendors dwindled, small businesses and foreign markets shut down. Manolo’s, a Colombian bakery that’s closed once in 28 years, did again after thugs chased and tackled customers when they left; the owner didn’t want to carry the weight “of maybe a kid to lose their father or mother on their way (to) get a cake.” Outside apartment complexes, auto parts stores, Wal Mart, masked agents menacingly patrolled, grabbing “whoever they see as Latino” and bumbling with handcuffs before driving off with them.

Panicked churchgoers fled after masked agents came and snatched a member as scared kids cried; one 15-year-old: “We thought church was safe.” Thugs “geared up like they’re in Fallujah” chased a flower-shop owner into the woods; bystanders followed, filmed, shamed them into clumsily retreating. The owner of a laundromat stayed open but locked the door behind each customer. as louts patrolled outside: “I know these folks, and I’m pretty sure they’re not criminals...People need to do laundry. Laundry does not discriminate.”An older woman having coffee on her porch as two guys she’d hired hung her Christmas lights chased off goons who came by “looking for easy pickings.” “We’ve got two human beings in my yard trying to make a living,” she raged. “It’s an abuse of all our laws.”

At a grocery store, Bovino heroically helped bulky guys in camo snare a teenager pushing carts and pin him to the ground; as agents drove out, they smirked at appalled residents filming them. And a neighbor filmed goons chasing down two women, U.S. citizens, who’d been honking at drivers to warn of a raid; as they pulled into their driveway, the guys aimed a rifle, screamed to open the car window, smashed it, hauled them off. The neighbor, in disbelief: “This is our reality now.” In a scathing editorial, The Charlotte Observer blasted that reality of a hateful regime that’s “already failed...with every unnecessarily smashed window, every sneer at due process, every federal agent’s smirk.” While the cruelty is still the point, they write, “It turns out Americans don’t like masked federal agents gleefully stomping on our core values.”



An oblivious, Bovino keeps celebrating doing it anyway, crowing on social media of his success in Charlotte. He touted the arrest of a “criminal illegal” with an alleged history of drunk driving, bragging he took him “off the streets so he can’t continue to ignore our laws (like he is) and drive intoxicated on the same roads you and your loved ones are on.” He gloated about capturing his latest victim with a photo of her in tears. He boasted 81 people were detained Saturday - the total eventually climbed to 130 - with, “We had a record day today!!!!!” He added, “With some good criminals also,” evidently forgetting the tired, worst-of-the-worst claim. Many had “significant criminal and immigration history,” he said, then listing minor breaches like DUI, larceny, and removal orders - which have always been, and remain, a civil offense.

His transgressions grew yet more egregious when he doubled down on the assault’s grotesque Charlotte’s Web shtick. Alongside a video of two victims, Bovino quoted, wildly out of context, the gentle, eloquent, freedom-loving E.B. White, who created a generous, compassionate spider, Charlotte, who uses her web and words for good, to save Wilbur the pig. “By helping you, perhaps I was trying to lift up my life a little,” she says. “Heaven knows anyone’s life can stand a little of that.” Bovino, deeply ignorant of lifting up a life, appropriated the words of Charlotte’s babies as they hatch and fly off: “Wherever the wind takes us. High, low. Near, far. East, west. North, south. We take to the breeze, we go as we please.” He then crudely, basically added, “Us too!” with, “Our agents go where the mission calls.” Just fucking fuck off, you fascist fucking loser.

Bovino, raged both White’s granddaughter and literary executor Martha White and Law Dork‘s Chris Geidner, “is exactly who E.B. White warned us about.” Geidner praises White, who once shamelessly admitted he believed in freedom “with burning delight,” as “a leading voice for American democracy.” In a 1940 essay, before the U.S. entered World War II, White described America’s worrisome reaction to the rise of Nazism as “a sort of dim acquiescence.” “The least a man can do at such a time is to declare himself and tell where he stands,” he wrote, adding he was “suspicious of people beginning to adjust to fascism and dictators. From such adaptable natures a smell rises. I pinch my nose.” After Charlotte, Bovino and his thugs went to Raleigh, where they were fiercely denounced; said Mayor Janet Cowell, “We didn’t ask for this.” Neither did 16-year old Manny Chavez. “Everyone is scared,“ he said. Still, he spoke up.

Saturday, November 22, 2025

SOCIALISM IS AS AMERICAN AS APPLE PIE

86 Democrats Join GOP in Voting for ‘Very, Very Stupid’ Resolution Condemning Socialism
WALL ST. DEMS ARE THE NEW GOP

“House Minority Leader Jeffries voting with the GOP in favor of this resolution is showing his ultrawealthy donors exactly who he fights for,” said one progressive leader. “It’s not the people.”


House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) (C) holds a press conference with Minority Whip Katherine Clark (D-Mass.) (L) and House Democratic Conference Chair Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) on October 1, 2025 in Washington, DC.
(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)


Julia Conley
Nov 21, 2025

Dozens of US House Democrats who joined the Republican Party on Friday in backing a resolution that denounced “socialism in all its forms” and opposed “the implementation of socialist policies in the United States” did so despite the fact that the GOP has used the term “socialism” liberally to describe a variety of social welfare programs—making the true meaning of the resolution open to interpretation.

“Socialism” is the word President Donald Trump has used for proposals to ensure the federal government provides healthcare to everyone in the US, and he’s among the Republicans who have warned extending Medicare to all Americans would “bankrupt our nation”—despite studies showing that the system would save more than $600 billion per year, and that wealthy countries that ensure all citizens have health coverage have far better health outcomes than the US.

Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) called the Green New Deal, which would create 3.4 million new green jobs per year, a “socialist scheme.”

During the Great Depression, Social Security—now credited with lifting more Americans out of poverty than any other US government program—was denounced by opponents of President Franklin D. Roosevelt as “socialism,” as was Medicare when it was introduced in 1965.

Republicans and their wealthy donors have warned that New York City’s Democratic mayor-elect, democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani, will wreak havoc on the city with his plans for fare-free buses and a network of city-owned grocery stores, with the president calling him a “100% Communist lunatic.” Fare-free public transit already exists in about 100 thriving cities around the world, including a growing number in the US, and more than a million Americans already benefit from publicly owned grocery stores where prices are 25-30% lower than at private stores—which also continue to run.



Friday’s resolution, introduced by Rep. María Elvira Salazar (R-Fla.), states its opposition to “socialist ideologues” including Joseph Stalin and Kim Jong Un as well as the “collectivistic system of socialism in all of its forms.”

After the US House vote on Friday, former Democratic Ohio state Sen. Nina Turner said that considering how “the GOP calls every social safety net measure ‘socialism,’ votes like this matter in a policy context.”

They also say a lot, said Turner, about the Democratic leaders—like House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (NY), House Minority Whip Katherine Clark (Mass.), and House Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar (Calif.)—who voted for the resolution.

“House Minority Leader Jeffries voting with the GOP in favor of this resolution is showing his ultrawealthy donors exactly who he fights for,” said Turner. “It’s not the people.”

Jeffries waited until the final days of the New York City mayoral campaign to endorse Mamdani, despite the fact that the candidate had won Jeffries’ district in the June primary and captured national attention for his relentless focus on making the city more affordable for New Yorkers.

Drop Site News was among those that noted the House voted as Mamdani was en route to Washington, DC to meet with Trump for the first time. The support for the resolution among top Democrats who have refused to embrace the popular young politician’s meteoric rise was viewed by some as a statement regarding Mamdani’s visit to the White House—during which Trump gave the mayor-elect a comparatively warm welcome.



Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) said those who supported the “pointless” resolution “feel threatened by democratic socialists like myself who are unbought and willing to take on the billionaire class.”

Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.) called the debate over socialism on the House floor “so very, very stupid.”

“A bunch of people with taxpayer-funded salaries, doing a job that is impossible to outsource to the private sector, are condemning the evils of socialism,” said Casten. “Either they are stupid, or that they think you are.”

“We have a mixed economy,” he added. “We benefit from free markets and competition in lots of sectors, and also have a judicial system, border security, national defense, economic security for seniors and those who can’t work that is socially funded. That’s a good thing! Condemning one half of that equation has no more logic—and is no more deserving of finite House floor time—than condemning defensive linemen because they never score touchdowns.”


House Passes Resolution Condemning Socialism Ahead of Mamdani White House Visit

Rashida Tlaib said the vote shows lawmakers “feel threatened” by those “willing to take on the billionaire class.”
November 21, 2025

Zohran Mamdani is seen on November 20, 2025 in New York City.BG048 / Bauer-Griffin / GC Images

Did you know that Truthout is a nonprofit and independently funded by readers like you? If you value what we do, please support our work with a donation.

Ahead of a visit by democratic socialist and New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani to the White House on Friday, House lawmakers overwhelmingly passed a resolution condemning socialism, with dozens of Democrats joining Republicans in their McCarthyist fervor.

The resolution “denouncing the horrors of socialism” passed 285 to 98 on Friday morning, with 86 Democrats joining 199 Republicans in voting “yes.” Ninety-eight Democrats voted against the measure, while two voted “present.”

“Yes” votes included House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York), who waited until the last minute to give a lukewarm endorsement of Mamdani earlier this month, despite Mamdani being the Democratic nominee.

The visit took place before President Donald Trump is slated to host Mamdani for a meeting at the White House on Friday afternoon. The meeting was a result of Mamdani’s office reaching out to the Trump administration, Mamdani said on Thursday, in hopes of working with the White House to lower costs for working people.

Republican Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar (Florida), the sponsor of the bill, named Mamdani in remarks on the House floor.

Related Story

Majority of Americans Support Mamdani’s Affordability Proposals, Poll Finds
Nearly 7 in 10 respondents said they back the mayor-elect’s proposal to raise taxes on corporations and the 1 percent. By Sharon Zhang , Truthout November 12, 2025


“I salute the president for receiving Mr. Mamdani because he won fair and square,” she said. “But let me just tell you something, knowing very well how Fidel [Castro] works and how Hugo Chavez works and how socialism works…. If it would have been the other way around, and Trump would have been the mayor-elect and Mamdani would have been the president of the United States, I assure you that there’s no way that Mamdani is going to receive Trump at the White House. Period.”

“And how do I know that? Because I know exactly how [socialists] operate,” she went on, ignoring the apparent circumstances surrounding the meeting.

At one point, debate on the resolution was derailed because Salazar attacked Rep. Maxine Waters (D-California), who spoke up against the resolution. For minutes, Salazar railed on Waters, saying she was a “friend” of late Cuban President Fidel Castro because Waters visited the country and spoke out against the U.S.’s embargo against Cuba.

Later, after Waters asked for Salazar’s words to be taken down, Salazar withdrew them from Congress’s record — but included the clip of her remarks in a post boasting about them on social media.

Waters criticized the resolution as “absolutely unnecessary,” and decried lawmakers for taking up the measure “instead of legislating and doing the work to tackle real problems that Americans face, like the skyrocketing cost of groceries” and health care crisis.

Rep. Rashida Tlaib later said on social media that the resolution was “pointless.”

“Clearly [House members] feel threatened by dem socialists like myself who are unbought & willing to take on the billionaire class,” she wrote. “To [Democratic Socialists of America] members across the country organizing every day to build more just communities: Thank you!”


The vote comes as the right is seeking to round up and punish left-wing dissidents, with the Trump administration labeling anti-capitalists and anti-fascists as “terrorists.”





Eugene V. Debs, Defender of American Liberty


Eugene V. Debs at Labor Conventionon January 1, 1910.
(Photo by Library of Congress/Corbis/VCG via Getty Images)

Released from jail on this day 130 years ago, the great socialist and labor leader delivered a speech we would do well to remember in these perilous times.


Jeffrey C. Isaac
Nov 22, 2025
Common Dreams

On November 22, 1895, Eugene V. Debs was released from Woodstock Jail, where he had been imprisoned for six months for his leadership of the 1894 Pullman strike. Later that day, before a large crowd of supporters at Battery D in Chicago, he spoke on the topic of “Liberty.”

Debs was a great orator, and “Liberty” is a brilliant speech, powerfully evoking both “the spirit of liberty” heralded by the Declaration of Independence, and the promise of a freedom yet to be redeemed by American workers in thrall to plutocratic government. As Nick Salvatore noted in his classic biography, Eugene V. Debs, Citizen and Socialist, this speech marked an important moment in the evolution of Debs from a radically republican labor activist to the country’s leading socialist.


Debs notes his own situation, “stripped of my constitutional rights as a freeman and shorn of the most sacred prerogatives of American citizenship.” He proceeds to defend the American Railway Union as a necessary and legitimate organization of workers, and the strike as a legitimate means of pursuing justice, which“ threw down no gauntlet to courts or armies—it simply resisted the invasion of the rights of workingmen by corporations.”

An adamant defense of worker rights, the speech’s overriding theme is unmistakably the political theme of “liberty” and indeed democracy. This is clear from Debs’s opening words:
Manifestly the spirit of ‘76 still survives. The fires of liberty and noble aspirations are not yet extinguished. I greet you tonight as lovers of liberty and as despisers of despotism. I comprehend the significance of this demonstration and appreciate the honor that makes it possible for me to be your guest on such an occasion. The vindication and glorification of American principles of government, as proclaimed to the world in the Declaration of Independence, is the high purpose of this convocation.

The entire first half of the speech centers on the theme of “personal liberty; or giving it its full height, depth, and breadth, American liberty, something that Americans have been accustomed to eulogize since the foundation of the Republic.” Paying tribute to the republic’s founding—“For the first time in the records of all the ages, the inalienable rights of man, ‘life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,’ were proclaimed July 4, 1776”—Debs proceeds to wax poetically, for eight long paragraphs, about the enduring resonance of that 1776 proclamation, the indivisibility of liberty, and the “more than satanic crime of stealing the jewel of liberty from the crown of manhood and reducing the victim of the burglary to slavery or to prison.” It is for this crime that he morally indicts the railroad magnates and their federal government allies for breaking the strike and imprisoning its leaders.

Debs insists that it is the labor movement that most embodies “the spirit of ‘76”:
To the unified hosts of American working men fate has committed the charge of rescuing American liberties from the grasp of the vandal horde that have placed them in peril, by seizing the ballot and wielding it to regain the priceless heritage and to preserve and transmit it without scar or blemish to the generations yet to come.

The ballot, Debs notes approvingly, “has been called a weapon that executes a free man’s will as lighting does the will of God.” Debs rhapsodizes in almost religious tones about the power of democratic elections:
There is nothing in our government it cannot remove or amend. It can make and unmake presidents and congresses and courts. It can abolish unjust laws and consign to eternal odium and oblivion unjust judges, strip from them their robes and gowns and send them forth unclean as lepers to bear the burden of merited obloquy as Cain with the mark of a murderer. It can sweep away trusts, syndicates, corporations, monopolies, and every other abnormal development of the money power designed to abridge the liberties of workingmen and enslave them by the degradation incident to poverty and enforced idleness, as cyclones scatter the leaves of the forest. The ballot can do all this and more. It can give our civilization its crowning glory—the cooperative commonwealth.

Debs appreciated the rhetorical and the inspirational power of the dissenting American political tradition that hearkened back to the Revolution and its “spirit of ‘76,” a tradition that included his heroes Jefferson, Paine, Garrison, Phillips, Lincoln, and Anthony. And he firmly believed that civil liberties and regular democratic elections represented forms of genuine if precarious social progress whose defense and expansion offered real opportunities for the furtherance of social and economic justice. He was, in short, a democrat.

He ended his speech with the hope that “American lovers of liberty are setting in operation forces to rescue their constitutional liberties from the grasp of monopoly and its mercenary hirelings.” That hope was not in vain, even if the Pullman strike was suppressed and Debs twice found himself in prison for refusing to be silenced, in 1895 and then in 1918 when imprisoned for his famous “Canton address,” critiquing WWI. The labor movement he helped to lead played a crucial role in advancing many of the policies—from the 8-hour workday to occupational safety and health regulation to “social security” broadly understood—that most Americans today simply take for granted. Debs was indeed one of the 20th century’s true crusaders for civil liberties and democratic inclusion. And his distinctive vision of a democratic socialism established an enduring legacy whose most recent heir is New York City’s mayor-elect, Zohran Mamdani, who indeed quoted Debs in his victory speech.At a time when the Trump administration is attacking liberty on a daily basis, targeting everyone on the left as a “radical lunatic” and “enemy from within,” and seeking to destroy the very possibility of political dissent and opposition, Debs’s paean to “Liberty” on November 22, 1895—and his commitment to its active promotion—has never been more relevant.





Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.


Jeffrey C. Isaac
Jeffrey C. Isaac is James H. Rudy Professor of Political Science at Indiana University, Bloomington. His books include: "Democracy in Dark Times"(1998); "The Poverty of Progressivism: The Future of American Democracy in a Time of Liberal Decline" (2003), and "Arendt, Camus, and Modern Rebellion" (1994).
Full Bio >


 Why We Must Replace the Global Economic System Built by the 1%



This is not rocket science and the global majority, the 99%, have the answers and are already putting them into practice.


Jenny Ricks
Deepak Xavier
Nov 22, 2025
Inequality.org


This year’s G20 Leaders Summit is taking place in Johannesburg, a short distance from Constitution Hill, a former prison complex that once held Nelson Mandela and other South African democracy fighters. As the world’s most powerful leaders meet behind closed doors, this former apartheid prison turned museum will publicly write another page in the history of global economic emancipation.

Movements, workers, activists, thinkers, creatives, artists, and communities from across South AfricaAfrica, Asia, and Latin America are gathering for a three-day People’s Summit for Economic Justice — a counter to the G20 — to build the power of the 99 percent. The Constitution Hill’s Old Fort, Women’s Jail, and former men’s prison cells are hosting radical conversations, art, music, and action for the Global Majority to tell their own story, share struggles and solutions, and show that another world isn’t just possible — it’s already being built by communities writing their own future.

RECOMMENDED...



Richest 0.1% Overwhelmingly Guilty of the ‘Climate Plunder’ Wrecking Planet Earth



$70 Trillion in Inherited Wealth Shows Global ‘Inequality Emergency’ Spiraling Out of Control

The G20 member countries account for over 85 percent of the global GDP. Over this forum’s two and half decades of existence, the G20 has failed to use its combined economic weight to steer global financial, trade, development, and fiscal policies to address global economic and environmental challenges. Instead, it has served the interest of the 1 percent: elites, corporations, and billionaires.

As a result, a handful of billionaires and super rich people globally have amassed far more wealth than they need, abusing the power they possess. They are wrecking democracies across the world as they make rules in their favor at the expense of the 99 percent and the planet.

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa appointed an “Extraordinary Committee” of independent experts that published the first-ever G20 global inequality report earlier this month. The report shows that the richest 1 percent has captured 41 percent of all new wealth since 2000, while the bottom half of humanity received just 1 percent. The report notes that one in four people globally now face food insecurity even as the wealth of billionaires reaches levels equivalent to up to 16 percent of global GDP. Those words will not mean much to those on the frontlines of inequality without action, without redistribution.

The International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and other bodies have also acknowledged that extreme inequalities are thwarting the pace and sustainability of economic growth, eroding social cohesion and trust, and undermining democratic institutions and political stability that is fueling conflict and social unrest. However, they are still part of the problem, not the solution.

Enraged young people from Morocco to Madagascar, Kathmandu to Lima continue to lead street protests worldwide demanding accountability and challenging economic systems because they are not working for them. They are frustrated by poor service delivery, abuse of power concentrated in the hands of a few, unfulfilled promises, economic systems that continue to squeeze the little they earn, unemployment, unjust debt and climate breakdown.

They are drawing a red line against the failed systems and saying loud and clear, “Enough is enough.”

This is a time bomb and a bigger explosion threatens the planet and everyone on it, regardless how fat their bank account is. But we have solutions. This is not rocket science and the global majority, the 99%, have the answers and are already putting them into practice.

Wealth taxes are a progressive solution to address extreme inequalities — far better than the consumption taxes that many governments in the Global South are imposing on their people to service unjust debt and compensate for unpaid taxes by the super-rich. Taxing the super-rich can generate significant recurring revenue and restore public trust. Tax revenues from the super-rich are enough to fund essential services, such as education, healthcare, and social safety nets, which are key drivers of long-term inequality reduction.

Participants in the People’s Summit are also demanding that rich polluters pay for just transitions to clean energy. They are calling for redistributing health care to guarantee reproductive justice and bodily autonomy. And they are demanding protection of civic space and cultural rights by defending the freedom to speak, organize, and create.

The 2025 G20 Leaders Summit taking place not far from the We the 99 Peoples Summit has an opportunity to right the wrongs of the past by listening to the global majority that are gathered at Constitution Hill. Global leaders, including the G20, must stop turning for solutions to the same elites who created and continue to fuel the inequality crisis. Instead, they need to listen to the voices of the 99% – the people who have endured inequality and survived against all odds.

The 99% hold the answers. And the answer is clear: replace the system built by the 1% with a system designed for and by the 99%.


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.


Jenny Ricks
Jenny Ricks is the Global Convenor of the Fight Inequality Alliance.
Full Bio >

Deepak Xavier
Deepak Xavier is Global Convener for Fight Inequality Alliance, a co-convener for the We The 99 People’s Summit for Economic Justice.
Full Bio >


‘We Must Overturn Citizens United,’ Says Sanders as Analysis Details Billionaire Takeover of US Politics

“If democracy is to survive, billionaires cannot be allowed to buy elections,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders.



Billionaire Miriam Adelson was pictured arriving at the inauguration of US President Donald Trump on January 20, 2025.
(Photo by Saul Loeb-Pool/Getty Images)

Jake Johnson
Nov 21, 2025
COMMON DREAMS


A yearlong investigation published Friday by the Washington Post examines how a small number of billionaires, now richer than ever, have exploited openings provided by the US Supreme Court, lawmakers, and sleepwalking regulatory agencies to flood the American political system with cash and advance their ideological—and financial—interests.

The Post analysis reveals that the nation’s top 20 billionaire donors pumped close to $5 billion combined into the US political system between 2015 and 2024, attempting to exert influence over both state-level and national elections.

In 2024, the newspaper found, over 80% of federal campaign spending by the 100 richest Americans flowed to Republicans, who delivered once again for rich benefactors by enacting yet another round of highly regressive tax cuts this past summer.

Topping the list of billionaire donors is Miriam Adelson and her late husband Sheldon, who have spent $621 million on federal races and $37 million on state races over the past decade, mostly backing Republican campaigns—including that of President Donald Trump.

Others on the list include former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, shipping magnates Richard and Elizabeth Uihlein, hedge fund manager Ken Griffin, Tesla CEO Elon Musk, and investor George Soros.

“In three landmark decisions, starting with 2010’s Citizens United vs. FEC, federal courts gutted post-Watergate campaign finance restrictions, clearing the way for donors to contribute unlimited money to elections,” the Post observed. “As a result, US politicians are more dependent on the largesse of the billionaire class than ever before, giving one-four-hundredth of 1% of Americans extraordinary influence over which politicians and policies succeed.”

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) called Citizens United, which spawned the super PACs that many billionaires now use as vehicles for unrestrained election spending, “the original sin.”

“Five Supreme Court Republican appointees, many helped onto the Court by right-wing billionaires, open the floodgates for unlimited political spending,” Whitehouse wrote in a social media post on Friday. “Then they refuse to police anonymous political spending they know is corrupting. This is the result.”






Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who has long decried the corrupting influence of billionaire and corporate money on American politics, said the Post investigation underscores why “we must overturn Citizens United and move to the public funding of elections.”

“A majority of Americans agree: If democracy is to survive, billionaires cannot be allowed to buy elections,” Sanders added.


As part of its probe, the Post conducted a survey aimed at determining how the US public feels about billionaires using a fraction of their immense fortunes—now at a record $8 trillion—to sway elections.

The survey of 2,500 Americans, conducted in September, found that 58% have a negative view of billionaires spending more money on elections. Forty-three percent of Americans, including 62% of Democrats and 21% of Republicans, believe billionaires have a negative impact on society overall.

“I don’t believe there is an ethical way for billionaires to even exist in this country,” Leah Welde, a 29-year-old Democrat and graduate school student in Philadelphia, told the Post. “To be sitting on that amount of money while citizens in this country are unhoused, hungry, and without medical care is abhorrent. I believe in spreading wealth.”




Elites wield huge influence over deepening polarisation –– now we can tell how much



Just a handful of influential voices may be enough to drive dramatic societal rifts, according to new research from Aalto University. The study gives unprecedented insight into the social media mechanics of the partisan divide.



Aalto University

Alignment 

image: 

The figure compares alignment across "issue pairings", CLIMATE, IMMIGRATION, ECONOMY, SOCIAL and EDUCATION between the 2019 and 2023 elections in Finland. It shows almost maximum alignment was reached amongst elites in online Twitter debate preceding the 2023 election. 

view more 

Credit: Ali Salloum / Aalto University





Just a handful of influential voices may be enough to drive dramatic societal rifts, according to new research from Aalto University. The study gives unprecedented insight into the social media mechanics of the partisan divide.

Political systems become polarised when internal unity within groups strengthens and the divide between them deepens. As polarisation intensifies, societal tensions can grow, making it difficult to find compromises. The intensity of polarisation has been measured in research, but until now its structural roots in social media have remained obscure.

Now, researchers from Aalto University used network theory to develop a method for measuring the impact of individuals on societal division. While the method can be applied to any case around which social media data can be gathered, the initial study utilised Twitter data collected before Finland’s 2019 and 2023 parliamentary elections. The results reveal how a relatively small elite can have a disproportionately large influence on shaping polarizing environments.

‘We know that size, or the activity level of a group or groups, don’t necessarily correlate with how divided society is on a particular issue,’ explains network scientist Ali Salloum, a doctoral researcher, and lead author of the study. ‘The method we came up with identifies the elite and the mass entirely through an algorithm –– quantifying how much each contributes to the overall divide.’

The team analysed 12 weeks of Twitter (now X) data preceding both elections, as the platform offers one of the clearest views into Finland’s digital polarisation dynamics. Based on core-periphery theory, hierarchical groups were identified, with participants classified algorithmically as elite or mass. Established community detection techniques were then used to map the location of elites on the political spectrum.

‘Not all thought leaders –– the so-called elite –– are politicians. But even without knowing exactly who they are, we can infer their status from the network’s structure. You don’t end up at the centre by accident,’ Salloum says.

According to the researchers, an elite cluster may include only a few hundred individuals, yet account for a striking share of overall polarisation. The study, recently published in Network Science, is the first to demonstrate this imbalance quantitatively.

The road to deadlock

Another key finding is that the algorithmically identified elite has become increasingly aligned in its views. Alignment refers to the likelihood that a person’s stance on one issue correlates with their opinions on other topics –– for example, in matters of climate or immigration policy.

‘In democracies, it’s healthy –– even desirable –– to disagree sharply on individual issues. But when alignment becomes complete, society splits into just two camps that disagree on absolutely everything –– there’s nothing left in common with the other side,’ says Mikko Kivelä, Professor of Computer Science at Aalto University and co-author of the study.

When hatred and suspicion towards those with different worldviews overshadow the importance of the best argument in political issues, or when interactions between people from different backgrounds dwindle, societal, and even individual well-being can significantly regress. 

In the Finnish case study, it was revealed that by 2023 alignment had almost reached its zenith among elites. For example, a progressive stance on climate almost certainly meant a correspondingly progressive view on immigration, and vice versa, while conservative social views almost always paired with conservative opinions on economics. In other words, over four years, thought-leaders had become intractably siloed –– a red flag for a functioning democracy.

‘One of the most serious consequences of polarisation and alignment –– beyond the threat of political violence –– is political gridlock. Legislation slows down and weakens, poor-quality decisions are made, or no decisions are made at all,’ says Salloum. 

Political pressure needed to restore access to data

Unfortunately, polarisation data can no longer be studied through X, as owner Elon Musk has restricted researchers’ access to user data. Despite this, the researchers hope to apply the method to other nations and contexts.

‘I have no reason not to assume this is a global phenomenon,’ says Salloum, for whom the next step is to study US and European data from Bluesky. However, ongoing research depends on having access to data, a point that frustrates Salloum.

‘We have seen for decades how important ‘information influence’ data like this is. It gives huge insights into mis- and dis-information, and the state of our democracies generally. Yet, one of the biggest platforms shuts down its APIs and suddenly there’s no access,’ he says. 

‘It’s especially frustrating when we already know what’s inside the black box, and the value of all that data that the platforms control. By law, researchers should have access, but it’s not being followed. In my opinion, we don’t have enough political pressure directed at keeping these platforms transparent and open,’ he concludes.


The figure shows the disproportionate contribution of right and left-wing elites to polarising debate across climate, immigration, economics, social and education in the lead up to Finnish national elections in 2019. 

The figure shows the disproportionate contribution of right and left-wing elites to polarising debate across climate, immigration, economics, social and education in the lead up to Finnish national elections in 2023.

Credit

Ali Salloum / Aalto University.