Thursday, December 18, 2025

 

Feedback loops accelerate warming, other atmospheric changes in Arctic



Oil-field emissions reshaping regional atmospheric processes, researchers report



Penn State

photo taken from an airplane showing dry Arctic air 

image: 

This image, taken from the aircraft King Air — the left wing is visible at the bottom right, shows an open lead and the overlying nascent clouds commonly referred to as sea smoke. Sea smoke forms when extremely cold, dry Arctic air moves over comparatively warmer open water in a lead. The resulting intense evaporation saturates the air just above the surface, and as this warm, moist air mixes with the frigid overlying air, water vapor condenses into tiny droplets that rise as swirling, steam-like plumes. 

view more 

Credit: Courtesy of CHACHA research team





UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. — The climate is changing and nowhere is it changing faster than at Earth’s poles. Researchers at Penn State have painted a comprehensive picture of the chemical processes taking place in the Arctic and found that there are multiple, separate interactions impacting the atmosphere.

Using two instrumented planes and ground-based measurements from a two-month long field campaign to compare chemical processes in two regions in the Arctic — and the largest oil field in North America — to surrounding areas, researchers made three discoveries. The findings were: openings in the sea ice — called leads – significantly influence atmospheric chemistry and cloud formation; emissions from the oil field measurably alter regional atmospheric composition; and together, these processes contribute to a feedback loop that accelerates sea-ice melt and amplifies Arctic warming.

The research was recently published in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. The work was part of a larger multi-institutional project called CHemistry in the Arctic: Clouds, Halogens, and Aerosols, or CHACHA. Led by five institutions, CHACHA examines chemical changes that occur as surface air is swept into the lower atmosphere, resulting in interactions among water particles, low clouds and pollution.

“This field campaign is an unprecedented opportunity to explore chemical changes in the boundary layer — the atmospheric layer closest to the planet’s surface — and to understand how human influence is altering the climate in this important region,” said Jose D. Fuentes, professor of meteorology in the Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science and corresponding author of the paper. “The resulting datasets are producing an improved understanding of the interactions between sea-spray aerosols, surface-coupled clouds, oil field emissions and multiphase halogen chemistry in the new Arctic.”

To study the chemistry of the boundary layer of the Arctic, researchers sampled air over snow-covered and newly frozen sea ice in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas, over open leads and across the snow-covered tundra of the North Slope of Alaska, including the oil and gas extraction region near Prudhoe Bay. The campaign was conducted out of Utqiaġvik, Alaska, between February 21 and April 16, 2022, shortly after the polar sunrise — a period of continuous sunlight following two months of darkness — when the increased UV rays intensify the chemical changes at the surface and in the lower atmosphere.

Researchers found that leads — ranging from a few feet to a few miles wide — created intense convective plumes and cloud formations, while lofting potentially harmful molecules, aerosol pollutants and water vapor — all things that can contribute to warming the climate — hundreds of feet into the atmosphere. These processes accelerated sea-ice loss by forcing even more convection and cloud formation, which increased moisture and heat transfer and led to the formation of even more leads, Fuentes said.

The team identified another feedback loop on land, with chemicals found in the saline snowpacks along the coast reacting with the emissions from the oil field. During the CHACHA campaign, researchers specifically observed bromine production along saline snowpacks — a phenomenon unique to polar regions. These bromine molecules rapidly depleted ozone in the boundary layer, creating another feedback loop that allows more of the sun’s rays to reach the surface, warming the snowpacks and releasing more bromine.

Additionally, during the field campaign, researchers found massive boundary layer changes over the Prudhoe Bay oil fields. Gas plumes from the extraction area reacted in the lower atmosphere, acidifying the air mass and producing harmful substances and smog, Fuentes said. They also found that halogens react with oil field plumes to create free radicals, which then form more stable substances that can travel long distances. Fuentes said these substances can contribute to regional environmental changes.

Fuentes said CHACHA researchers are now investigating how these reactions affect the broader Arctic environment, including the formation of smog plumes that, despite occurring in an otherwise pristine region, reach pollution levels comparable to those found in major urban areas such as Los Angeles. For example, nitrogen dioxide levels reached about 60-70 parts per billion, levels associated with the noxious gases blamed for urban smog.

The next steps, researchers said, involve creating datasets that numerical modelers can use to better understand how global climate may evolve as a result of these localized factors in the Arctic.

Other CHACHA team members were from Stony Brook University, the University at Albany, University of Michigan and University of Alaska Fairbanks. This research was funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation.

At Penn State, researchers are solving real problems that impact the health, safety and quality of life of people across the commonwealth, the nation and around the world.

For decades, federal support for research has fueled innovation that makes our country safer, our industries more competitive and our economy stronger. Recent federal funding cuts threaten this progress.

Learn more about the implications of federal funding cuts to our future at Research or Regress.

Some key researchers and staff who deployed to Utqiaġvik, Alaska, for the CHACHA campaign are seen with two research aircraft, the University of Wyoming King Air (left) and Purdue University Beechcraft Duchess Airborne Laboratory for Atmospheric Research.  Shown in front of the aircraft are pilots and engineers from the University of Wyoming and scientists from University of Michigan, the University at Albany, Penn State, Stony Brook University and University of Alaska Fairbanks.  

Credit

Courtesy of CHACHA research team



 

LionGlass windows, windshields in development with Vitro Architectural Glass



Penn State
Researchers in a glass manufacturing facility 

image: 

Vitro Architectural Glass has signed a multi-year research agreement to scale up LionGlass, a new, patent-pending glass technology invented at Penn State, for use in flat glass applications across architectural and automotive markets. 

view more 

Credit: Courtesy of Vitro Architectural Glass





UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. — LionGlass, a stronger and more sustainable glass invented at Penn State, may soon be developed for windows and windshields, thanks to a new partnership with North America’s largest architectural glass manufacturer Vitro Architectural Glass. The company signed a multi-year research agreement to scale up the new, patent-pending glass technology for use in flat glass applications across architectural and automotive markets.

“Partnering with Penn State gives us access to world-class materials science expertise and a deep legacy of innovation in glass research,” said Adam Polcyn, vice president of research and development at Vitro Architectural Glass. “This team’s collaborative spirit and technical excellence make them an ideal partner for advancing the future of glass.”

The project, which runs through July 2028, will focus on adapting LionGlass for the float process, the standard method for producing flat glass which involves floating molten glass on a bath of molten tin. Used in windows, windshields and solar panels, flat glass is the largest segment of the global glass industry, making this collaboration a major step forward in commercializing LionGlass at scale, said John Mauro, co-inventor of LionGlass and head of the department of materials science and engineering at Penn State.

“This is more than just a research agreement,” he said. “It’s a partnership that could redefine how glass is made — and it’s happening right here in Pennsylvania.”

He added that LionGlass promises to cut the carbon footprint of glass manufacturing in half, as it lowers the melting temperature of glass by about 400 degrees Celsius (C) and eliminates the use of carbonate materials, which are major contributors to carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in traditional glass production. It is also more damage resistant, in some cases reaching ten times the crack resistance of conventional glass.

The partnership reflects a long history of glassmaking in Pennsylvania, Mauro noted. The former architectural and automotive glass businesses of PPG, started near Pittsburgh in 1883, were acquired by Vitro in 2016 and 2017 respectively, and Vitro still maintains its U.S. headquarters and R&D laboratories in the area. Vitro operates four float glass lines in Pennsylvania, two in Carlisle and two in Meadville.

“This partnership is especially meaningful in terms of Penn State’s land-grant mission,” Mauro said. “Working with a company that has deep roots in the commonwealth aligns perfectly with our mission to serve the state through research and innovation.”

As part of the agreement, Vitro will be sending one of its own employees, Daniel Kramer, back to Penn State to pursue a doctorate and work directly on the project. Kramer earned both his bachelor’s and master’s degrees at Penn State under the late Carlo Pantano.

“It’s really exciting to be a part of this continuity and legacy in the university’s research community,” Kramer said. "This is a unique opportunity to work with an industry leader like Vitro while contributing to the university's strong tradition of research excellence, a collective effort aimed at more sustainable manufacturing processes to reduce carbon emissions."

Kramer will lead the research alongside Nicholas Clark, assistant research professor at Penn State and co-inventor of LionGlass, whom Kramer trained in Mauro’s lab as an undergrad. The team will evaluate LionGlass’s compatibility with industrial float processes and optimize its composition for flat glass applications. The team will also test its compatibility with various downstream, value-added processes used in architectural, automotive and solar glass markets.

 

Genetic teamwork may be the secret to climate-resilient plants, researchers find



New study suggests that following hybridization, when plant genomes work together, trees perform better under climate stress



Penn State

Study first author Michelle Zavala-Paez, doctoral candidate at Penn State 

image: 

Study first author Michelle Zavala-Paez, doctoral candidate in Penn State’s Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, selects the main shoot of a hybrid Populus tree to collect the first fully expanded leaf for physiological measurements. 

view more 

Credit: Penn State





UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. — A plant’s success may depend on how well the three sets of genetic instructions it carries in its cells cooperate, according to a new study led by plant scientists at Penn State. In an analysis of the hybrids of two crossbred tree species, the researchers found that two sets of those genes inherited from different species may not work well together, disrupting the plant’s ability to harvest light for photosynthesis and take up key nutrients. However, when the combination of inherited genes better matches up, those plants may be better able to adapt to changing environments.

According to the researchers, who published their findings in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, the work could help inform plant breeding to help produce plants that are more resilient to the changing climate. They focused on two of the three sets of genetic instructions, or genomes: One resides in the cell’s nucleus, or control center, while the other genome is contained in the chloroplast, the structure essential for photosynthesis. The third genome is in the mitochondria, which is crucial for cellular respiration, but the team did not include it in their analysis because the study focused on photosynthetic activity.

“Different components of a plant’s genome — its genetic material — work together to keep it functioning well, and when two different species or populations interbreed, or hybridize, this coordination can break down,” said study first author Michelle Zavala-Paez, doctoral candidate in Penn State’s Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology. She explained that when the nuclear and chloroplast — the specialized organelle in plant cells converting light energy into chemical energy, or sugars, using sunlight, water and carbon dioxide, releasing oxygen as a byproduct — genomes have evolved separately in different species, their “teamwork” might not work smoothly in hybrids and result in what is called “cytonuclear mismatch.”

Focused on two closely related tree species in the Pacific Northwest, black cottonwood and balsam poplar, the team was led by study senior author Jill Hamilton, associate professor in Penn State’s College of Agricultural Sciences, director of the Schatz Center for Tree Molecular Genetics and Zavala-Paez’s adviser.

The researchers collected vegetative cuttings — branches that can regrow roots and shoots — from 574 different trees within the natural hybrid zone between black cottonwood and balsam poplar in a geographic swath stretching from Alaska to the southeast through Canada’s Yukon Territory, British Columbia and Alberta and through the U.S. states of Washington, Idaho, Montana and Wyoming. Within this region, the researchers identified six different east-west contact zones where the two species naturally hybridize.

The cuttings were sent to Blacksburg, Virginia, where collaborators at Virginia Tech propagated them under controlled greenhouse conditions. The researchers extracted the DNA and analyzed the genomes of the propagated vegetation, capturing both the whole nuclear and chloroplast genomes. Sequencing the genomes of so many hybrid trees and analyzing the huge amount of genetic data collected in this research would not have been possible, Hamilton noted, without the immense computing power of the Roar Collab Cluster, the high-performance computing facility managed by the Institute for Computational and Data Sciences at Penn State.

The team also sent the propagated material to field locations in Virginia and Vermont, where seedlings were used to establish common garden experiments. Growing genetically identical trees with mixed genetic ancestry across different environments allowed the team to assess how different nuclear and chloroplast interactions influence plant health, including photosynthetic traits and nutrient use critical to plant fitness.

The researchers said they wanted to determine, when hybridization occurs, whether genes in the nucleus and chloroplast genome that evolved together tend to stay together. Additionally, they aimed to understand if mismatches between nuclear and chloroplast ancestry influence plant performance in different environments.

Overall, the researchers found that the chloroplast genome and the nuclear genes that interact with it did not consistently stay together across hybrid zones. However, in certain locations where steep environmental gradients were observed — including the transition from warmer, more humid maritime conditions associated with coastal environments to cooler boreal environments, like in the Rockies Mountains of northwestern Canada — local environmental conditions appeared to select for genes that had evolved together. In other words, the environment can select for genes that work well together, to stay together.

The researchers also discovered that when a tree’s chloroplast ancestry did not match its nuclear ancestry, its physiological performance could change — sometimes for better, sometimes for worse — depending on the environment in which it grew. For example, trees whose chloroplast and nuclear genomes did not match generally showed lower photosynthetic efficiency — meaning they were less effective at turning sunlight into usable energy. This effect was observed across environments but was exacerbated in the warmer Virginia environment.

The study offers new insight into how plants evolve and how scientists might help them face the challenges of a warming world, according to Hamilton, who is currently a Leadership Fellow with Penn State’s Huck Institute of the Life Sciences.

“Understanding which genome combinations perform best could guide breeding programs to develop more resilient plants and help preserve biodiversity in a rapidly changing climate,” Hamilton said. “The study shows that the interaction between nuclear and chloroplast genomes affects how well hybrid plants function, and that the environmental context of these interactions can strengthen, weaken or even reverse the effects of these genetic mismatches.”

Contributing to the research were: Stephen Keller, University of Vermont; Jason Holliday, Virginia Tech; Matthew Fitzpatrick, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science; and Brianna Sutara, a Penn State alum who graduated with a bachelor’s degree in biology.

This research was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation and the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Additional support was provided by Schatz Center for Tree Molecular Genetics and the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences.

At Penn State, researchers are solving real problems that impact the health, safety and quality of life of people across the commonwealth, the nation and around the world.    

For decades, federal support for research has fueled innovation that makes our country safer, our industries more competitive and our economy stronger. Recent federal funding cuts threaten this progress.    

Learn more about the implications of federal funding cuts to our future at Research or Regress.


Study first author Zavala-Paez selecting leaves to measure the photosynthetic efficiency of three-year-old hybrid poplars using a hand-held device called a porometer, shown in the inset. 

Credit

Penn State