Thursday, September 29, 2022

Ban on Aleister Crowley lecture at Oxford University – Guardian archive, 1930

4 February 1930: Disciplinary action will be taken against university Poetry Society if Crowley is allowed to give talk on a 15th century magician

FACSIMILE PAMPHLET banned_lecture_text.pdf (100thmonkeypress.com)

From our correspondent

THE GUARDIAN
Tue 4 Feb 2020 

Oxford, Monday

A lecture which was to have been given to the University Poetry Society to-night by Mr Aleister Crowley has been officially banned. Mr Crowley, who was to have spoken on the fifteenth-century magician Gilles de Rais, has received notice from Mr H Speaight, the secretary of the Poetry Society, not to come to Oxford as disciplinary action would be taken if his lecture were delivered here. The secretary’s letter was as follows:-


Unseen Aleister Crowley writings reveal 'short-story writer of the highest order'

I am writing to tell you that we have been unfortunately forced to cancel next Monday’s meeting of the Poetry Society. It has come to our knowledge that if your proposed paper is delivered disciplinary action will be taken involving not only myself but the rest of the members of the society. In these circumstances you will, I trust, understand why we have had to cancel the meeting.

Mr Crowley’s Statement

Mr Crowley, when interviewed at his home in Kent, said he considered that there was “some underhand business” behind the prohibition. He said he thought the trouble was due to a report that he was responsible, directly or indirectly, for the death in Sicily of a young Oxford undergraduate, Mr Raoul Loveday, who was his secretary. He also said:

“Perhaps the refusal to let me lecture has come because Gilles de Rais is said to have killed 500 children in ritual murder and in some way this was connected with myself, since the accusation that I have not only killed but eaten children is one of the many false statements that have been circulated about me in the past.”

Copies or the lecture which Mr Crowley would have delivered are to be on sale in the streets of Oxford to-morrow.

Editorial: timid Oxford

As is only fitting, Oxford undergraduates are more adventurous than Oxford dons. The Oxford Poetry Society, a typically worthy undergraduate club, decided to venture on a strange fields by listening to a lecture by Mr Aleister Crowley on Gilles de Rais, a fifteenth-century magician known to history as the companion-in-arms of Joan of Arc and to children as the celebrated Bluebeard. The dons, however, took alarm, and so Mr Crowley has had to stay behind in Kent, leaving, one imagines, his inquiring young disciples to the less exciting delights of a paper on Wordsworth, or, perhaps, even on the metrical basis of Alexander Pope’s verse. But perhaps the young men were not really so much adventurous as foolhardy, for, according to Mr Crowley’s statement to a reporter, Gilles de Rais seems to have a been a man of whom the worst might be believed.


From the archive, 13 April 1934: "Black Magic" Libel Action

Mr Crowley, however, seems to think that possibly the ban on his lecture may have been caused not so much by the horror of the tale he had to tell as by a possible confusion in the Vice Chancellor’s mind between the lecturer and the subject of his lecture, for he tells us: “The accusation that I have not only killed but eaten children is one of the many false statements that have been circulated about me.

” The story he had to tell was gruesome enough. De Rais was accused of having killed 500 children in ritual murder, and all that can be said in his defence is that the ecclesiastical court which tried and excommunicated him knew of only 140 cases.

 Perhaps, however, after all, Mr Crowley was only proposing to talk about Rais as the patron and part-author of the Mystère de la Passion, or the Mystery of Orleans. In that case it would be a pity to deprive the young men of so much erudition.


 ALSO SEE

 Aleister Crowley’s Forbidden Lecture Revisited –Murder, Magick & Gilles De Rais
By Mogg Morgan





Joan of Arc becomes non-binary icon in London play

Agence France-Presse
September 29, 2022

France's sainted Joan of Arc has been reimagined as a non-binary icon in a controversial new play in London Joël SAGET AFP

A new play in London has reinvented France's sainted Joan of Arc as a non-binary icon, who rejects female identity as they struggle to find a place in a man's world.

"I, Joan" had not even been performed at Shakespeare's Globe theatre in August when Time Out magazine called it "the most controversial play of the year".

The first images, showing Joan with breasts bound, were enough to set social networks alight.

Hardly a month goes by in Britain without a battle about gender identity and the play has given all sides in the debate fresh ammunition.

The play about France's patron saint, the 'maid of Orleans' who repelled the English in the Hundred Years War in the 15th century, was written by Charlie Josephine, with Joan played by Isobel Thom.

Both Josephine and Thom were born female but define themselves as non-binary.

The staging of the play at the landmark theatre on the South Bank of the River Thames is firmly contemporary, with no period costume.

The wife of the king's eldest son or dauphin, the later king Charles VII, is played by a black woman. Modern choreography defines the fight scenes.

But Joan's story is still told -- from meeting the dauphin and fighting battles to standing trial and being burnt at the stake in 1431.

The question of gender runs throughout.


"To be born a girl and you are not a girl. God, why did you put me in this body?" a short-haired Joan asks at one point, wearing men's clothes.

Joan rejects the dresses that people expect them to put on.

"I am not a woman. I do not fit that word," they say. One of her friends suggests: "Maybe your word has not been invented yet?"


Her allies then suggest she uses the pronoun "they", prompting huge cheers from the audience. Opponents in the play call her "she".

At Joan's trial for heresy, one sentence is repeated by the judges: "Do you think it is well to take men's dress? Even if it is unlawful?"

"What are you so afraid of?" Joan replies, laughing.

"I am not a woman. I am a warrior."

Controversy

Feminists such as Heather Binning, founder of the UK-wide Women's Rights Network, are against the portrayal.

"She experienced what she experienced because she was a woman. You can't change that," she said.

"This lobby group is hijacking all our inspirational women from history. This ideology is insulting to women.

"There's a lot of women we don't know about because history was written by men for men."

But Josephine and Thom defended the play.

"I forgot I was blaspheming a saint," Josephine wrote in The Guardian.

"Nobody is taking historical Joan away from you," insisted Thom on Twitter. "Nobody is taking away your Joan, whatever Joan may mean to you...

"This show is art: it's an exploration, it's imagination."

Shakespeare's Globe took the same approach, likening the interpretation in "I Joan" to the approach of the celebrated English playwright.

"Shakespeare did not write historically accurate plays. He took figures of the past to ask questions about the world around him," it said.

"Our writers of today are no different. History has provided countless and wonderful examples of Joan portrayed as a woman.

"This production is simply offering the possibility of another point of view. That is the role of theatre: to simply ask the question 'imagine if?'"

Zeitgeist


Re-examining Joan's life through a contemporary lens is also taking hold in her native France.

"It's the Zeitgeist," said Valerie Toureille, a university professor specializing in the Hundred Years War and the author of a 2020 book on Joan.

"It doesn't shock me. There are women who decided to take a different path from both men and women. That's the case with Joan of Arc," she added.

Asked about Joan's wearing of men's clothes, she said: "It was for protection against rape and it's much easier to ride a horse as a man than looking like an Amazon."


Nevertheless, for Toureille, men's clothes on Joan was the key issue at the heresy trial.

"This is material proof that backs up the religious argument. For men of the Church, Joan in these clothes went beyond her status as a woman."

© 2022 AFP

 

  

 

 

 

In the 15th Century, France is a defeated and ruined nation after the One Hundred Years War against England. The fourteen years old farm girl Joan of Arc claims to hear voices from Heaven asking her to lead God's Army against Orleans and crowning the weak Dauphin Charles VII as King of France. Joan gathers the people with her faith, forms an army and conquers Orleans. 1948, Director: Victor Fleming, Writers: Maxwell Anderson, Andrew Solt, Stars: Ingrid Bergman, José Ferrer, Selena Royle,

   
 From Columbia Pictures and internationally acclaimed director Luc Besson comes the story of Joan of Arc, the woman who followed her own path and changed the course of history. © 1999 Gaumont.
   
Stars Leelee Sobieski in this one full movie from 2 parts, edited in high definition. 
I hope you'll enjoy this epic production from Alliance Atlantis.

   
 The Passion of St. Joan of Arc Premiered May 29, 2022 

 HM Television (English) The Passion of Saint Joan of Arc is a documentary that has been released on the centennial of the canonization of the Maid of Orleans (May 16, 1920). This brave young woman with a unique mission reminds us just how important it is that Jesus Christ be the King of our nation, of the entire world, and of our hearts. She carried out her mission in absolute fidelity and confidence in God’s will, revealed to her by her “voices”. Hers is not a life of mere heroism, but rather a model of holiness, of complete surrender to God’s will to the point of sacrificing her own life at only 19 years of age. The Passion of Saint Joan of Arc is presented by Javier Paredes, Professor of Modern History. The documentary also features contributions from: His Excellency Marc Aillet, Bishop of Bayonne (France); Sr. Marie de la Sagesse, author of “Santa Juana de Arco. Virgen, Reina, Mártir”; Alain Olivier, President of the Our Lady of Bermont Association (France); Philippe de Villiers, Founder of “Puy du Fou” Theme Park; Margarita Torres, Professor of Medieval History; Fr. Jacques Olivier, Author of Prophéties et prédictions de Jeanne d’Arc; Jorge Fernández, Former Internal Affairs Minister (Spain); Jacques Tremolet de Villers, Lawyer and author of Jeanna D’Arc: le procès de Rouen.
Taliban fire into air to disperse women's rally backing Iran protests

Agence France-Presse
September 29, 2022

Taliban forces fired shots into the air to disperse a women's rally supporting protests that have erupted in Iran Wakil KOHSAR AFP

Taliban forces on Thursday used gunfire to disperse a women's rally in the Afghan capital supporting protests in Iran over the death of a woman in morality police custody.

Both Afghanistan and Iran are run by hardline Islamist governments that enforce strict dress codes on women.

Chanting the same "Women, life, freedom" mantra used in Iran, about 25 women protested in front of Kabul's Iranian embassy before Taliban forces fired into the air, an AFP correspondent reported.

In neighbouring Iran, dozens of people have been killed since demonstrations erupted over 22-year-old Mahsa Amini's death after she was arrested for allegedly breaching rules on hijabs and modest clothing.

On Thursday in Kabul, women in headscarves carried banners that read: "Iran has risen, now it's our turn!" and "From Kabul to Iran, say no to dictatorship!"

"We need to end these horrific governments," said a protester who did not reveal her name for security reasons.

"People here are also tired of the Taliban's crimes. We are sure that one day our people will rise in the same way as the Iranian people," she said.

Taliban forces swiftly snatched the banners and tore them in front of the protesters.

They also ordered some journalists to delete videos of the rally.

An organizer, speaking anonymously, told AFP the rally was staged "to show our support and solidarity with the people of Iran and the women victims of the Taliban in Afghanistan".

'Severe restrictions'

Protests staged by women in Afghanistan have become increasingly rare after the detention of core activists at the start of the year.

Like in Iran, women risk arrest, violence and stigma for taking part in demonstrations calling for their rights.

Since returning to power last year, the Taliban have issued a slew of restrictions controlling women's lives based on their interpretation of Islamic sharia law.

Many of the rules -- including dress code, segregation from men and traveling with a male guardian -- are monitored by the Taliban's vice and virtue police who roam the streets dressed in white.

Women must fully cover themselves in public, preferably with the all-encompassing burqa, according to the rules, which are enforced with varying rigor across the country.

The Taliban have also blocked girls from returning to secondary schools and barred women from many government jobs, although some senior Taliban are divided on the issue of education.

Deputy foreign minister Sher Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai at a function earlier this week said "education is obligatory for men and women".

"If we want national unity then doors of educational institutions must be open for all," he said on live television.

The state of women's rights in Afghanistan remains a top concern for Western nations, with no country yet officially recognizing the Taliban government.

Earlier this week, a United Nations report denounced the "severe restrictions" on women and called for them to be reversed.

"The international community has not and will not forget Afghan women and girls," the report said.


© 2022 AFP
Anti-war novel banned by Nazis revived through German eyes

Agence France-Presse
September 29, 2022

Although director Edward Berger (Far Left) declined to discuss the war raging in Ukraine, reviewers noted the obvious parallels to a story about a soldier fighting for a nationalist lie
 John MACDOUGALL AFP

Banned by the Nazis for its anti-war message, the classic novel "All Quiet on the Western Front" is getting a Netflix revival with lessons for a new troubled age.

The nearly century-old book, already the subject of an Oscar-winning film and an acclaimed TV movie, is being brought to the screen for the first time by a German director.

"My film stands out from American or British (war) films made from the point of view of the victors," film-maker Edward Berger, 52, told AFP.

"In Germany, there is always this feeling of shame, mourning and guilt (surrounding war). It was important for me to present this perspective."

Published in 1929, the novel by Erich Maria Remarque depicts the experiences of a teenage German soldier during World War I.

It is one of the most influential examples of anti-militaristic literature ever written, translated into over 60 languages and selling more than 50 million copies worldwide.

Just one year after it came out, a US film adaptation by Lewis Milestone was released which would win the Academy Awards for best picture and best director.

But its subversive message saw the work banned in Germany and targeted in the 1933 book burnings by the Nazis, who accused it of "betraying soldiers".
'Propaganda and manipulation'

Berger, the director, is best known for his 2018 Emmy-nominated miniseries "Patrick Melrose" starring Benedict Cumberbatch.

He said the movie, which has been selected as Germany's submission for the 2023 international feature film Oscar, aimed to show "the perspective of the vanquished".

This includes aspects not covered in the book: the signing of the Armistice after World War I and the harsh conditions imposed on the Germans that later fed Nazi propaganda to justify nationalism and the outbreak of World War II.

In the novel, the entire conflict is viewed through the eyes of Paul Baeumer (played in the film by Austrian stage actor Felix Kammerer), a volunteer soldier on the Western front.

Once in the trenches, he quickly becomes aware of the absurdity of war and the patriotic brain-washing that got him there.

Berger said he was pushed to accept the project by his 16-year-old daughter, who had just studied this book like several generations of high school students before her.

When he started filming nearly three years ago, he also wanted to tackle growing nationalism in the West.


"There was Brexit, Trump, Orban -- there were a lot of voters choosing the far-right," he said.

"Institutions like the EU, which has guaranteed the peace for us for 70 years, were being called into question by demagogues through propaganda and manipulation."

By making a movie that shows where such developments can lead, Berger said he was also sounding an alarm bell.

'Emotional punch'

Although the director declined to discuss the war raging in Ukraine, reviewers noted the obvious parallels to a story about a soldier fighting for a nationalist lie.

Martin Schwickert of the RND media group called the film "frighteningly current in light of the Ukraine war", saying it "made plain what war means for those who have to fight it".

In the book and the film, Baeumer dies a few days before the end of the conflict along with all of his comrades. Shortly before, he kills a French soldier.

In one of several graphic battle scenes which drew comparisons with Steven Spielberg's "Saving Private Ryan", Baeumer recognizes his enemy's shared humanity.

While rummaging in the pocket of the fallen Frenchman's uniform, Baeumer discovers a photo of his wife and his young daughter and blames himself for having made a widow and an orphan.

After its release in German cinemas on Thursday, the film will be available worldwide on Netflix in October.

Its premiere drew mixed reviews, with the conservative daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung withering in its critique: "In Germany, even after 100 years, one can't see the difference between a good and a bad war film".

However the top-selling Bild hailed the two-and-a-half-hour film as "brilliantly shot, wonderfully acted and packing a strong emotional punch".

"As devastating as the story is, it's magnificently brought to the screen. A film everyone should see, especially in these times."

© 2022 AFP

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_Quiet_on_the_Western_Front

All Quiet on the Western Front (German: Im Westen nichts Neues, lit. 'In the West Nothing New') is a novel by Erich Maria Remarque, a German veteran of World War I. The book describes the German soldiers' extreme physical and mental stress during the war, and the detachment from civilian life felt by many of … See more



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_Quiet_on_the_Western_Front_(1930_film


RIP
'Extraordinary' elephant that survived poaching dies in drought-hit Kenya

Agence France-Presse
September 29, 2022

Older elephants and young calves are the first to succumb to prolonged drought, experts say Fredrik Lerneryd
 AFP


An "extraordinary and resilient" African elephant who defied all odds to give birth despite being shot five times by poachers has died in Kenya's drought-ravaged north, conservationists said on Thursday.

"Monsoon" was euthanised by veterinarians after collapsing several times in poor health in Samburu, an arid expanse that like most of northern Kenya is suffering the driest conditions in 40 years.

The great matriarch was believed to be in her mid-60s, at the upper reaches of life expectancy for an elephant in the wild.

"It's estimated her ill health was brought on by old age and exacerbated by the drought," read a statement from Save the Elephants, a Kenya-based wildlife conservation group.

A mother of seven calves, Monsoon survived being shot five times during a rampant poaching crisis about a decade ago that sent Africa's wild elephant populations into freefall.

During the wholesale massacre of elephants for ivory, Monsoon lost two of her own calves to poachers, and scientists believed she would never give birth again after the trauma of being shot.

But in 2018 she delivered a calf in Samburu, nine years after her ordeal.

It was not the first time she had defied the experts.

In 2006 she led her family to safety up one of the biggest hills in Samburu, shortly after Save the Elephants published a study asserting that elephants tended to avoid steep terrain.

Four consecutive rainy seasons have failed in Kenya, Somalia and Ethiopia, an unprecedented climatic event that has pushed millions across the Horn of Africa into extreme hunger.


Older elephants and young calves are the first to succumb to prolonged drought, experts say.

"Sadly the outlook for rain later this year is grim and there are fears the drought may stretch well into 2023, which is a major worry," said Save the Elephants founder Iain Douglas-Hamilton.

"We are working with our partners, local communities and government in Kenya to address the long-term problems the drought will bring to wildlife and communities alike and doing our best to prevent more elephants like Monsoon from dying."


© 2022 AFP
Gavin Newsom says Joe Biden is 'hard-wired for a different world' of 'compromise' that's gone

ngaudiano@insider.com (Nicole Gaudiano) - Yesterday

President Joe Biden has "learned the hard way" that attempts to unite MAGA Republicans and Democrats around common values won't work right now, California Gov. Gavin Newsom said on MSNBC.

Asked whether it's a "fool's errand" to try and bridge the gap between the left and right, Newsom said it is at the moment.

"I mean, he's hardwired for a different world, but that world is gone and he's acknowledged that very publicly on multiple occasions," Newsom said during a wide-ranging interview with host Alex Wagner.

Newsom, who's been calling out hardline Republican governors, said Biden's decency, honor and character make it hard for him to take the fight to Republicans.

"He wants to compromise, he wants to find our better angels, and he wants to find that sweet spot in terms of answering our collective vision and values," he said. "But that's not how the system is designed."

Newsom said this isn't what the Supreme Court, redistricting efforts, or voter suppression efforts represent right now or "the rights that are being rolled back in real time."

After campaigning on finding unity, Biden has more recently blasted MAGA Republicans as a threat to American democracy.

Newsom said his late mother might tell him to just model better behavior. "Well, we've been doing that, and people are losing their rights," he said. "We've got to hold them accountable and, yes, we prepare ourselves for a great reconciliation."

That's coming, he said, because "for no other reason, we can't live like this."

Newsom has drawn attention recently for taking aim at Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, in particular.

He invited Floridians to California, "where we still believe in freedom," in a $105,000 ad buy over the July 4 weekend, fueling national speculation about whether he's considering his own 2024 bid.

He says he will not run for president in 2024, in part due to surviving a recall election last year.
Read the original article on Business Insider
NOT RACIST AT ALL👿
Trump told guests he wasn’t using same White House toilet as Obama: ‘You understand what I’m talking about’

Raw Story - Yesterday 
By Travis Gettys

Donald Trump speaks to the press inside the White House/Screenshot

Donald Trump mistook a racially mixed group of Democratic staffers for domestic aides and asked them to serve the hors d’oeuvres, according to a new book.

The recently sworn-in president turned to the staffers for Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and others during a January 2017 meeting and asked them to get the canapes, according to excerpts from a forthcoming book from New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman published by Rolling Stone.

"Why don't you get" the food, Trump told the staffers, and then-White House chief of staff Reince Priebus rushed to correct him, but he made another bigoted comment in the same meeting by claiming Hillary Clinton had won the popular vote in 2016 due to ballots cast by "illegals."

“I don’t believe so, Mr. President," Pelosi said.

Trump periodically told visitors that his White House workspace had a "secret bathroom," and explained that he'd completely renovated the restroom after taking over for Barack Obama, but staffers would correct him and explain that only the toilet seats had been changed, which is customary during presidential transitions.

”You understand what I’m talking about," Trump said to one visitor, according to Haberman.

The guest, Haberman reported, “interpreted [the remark] to mean Trump did not want to use the same bathroom as his Black predecessor.”
MPs should investigate high food prices as Canadians ‘losing faith’ in system: expert

Anja Karadeglija - Yesterday - CBC


The federal government should investigate the soaring cost of groceries to get to the bottom of unexplained price hikes of goods like meat, and to address the “dangerous” number of Canadians who believe wrongdoing is to blame, according to food policy expert Sylvain Charlebois.


A wide selection of fresh produce is seen at a Dundas Street grocery store in London, Ont.


“Is there profiteering going on? There is a possibility, because we have concerns with some verticals in the grocery store,” he said. “Some of the increases we can explain. But a portion we just can’t.”

NDP MP Alistair MacGregor is set to introduce a motion at the House of Commons agriculture committee meeting Wednesday afternoon, asking MPs to study the profits large grocery stories are making while grocery prices increase.

Charlebois, a professor at Dalhousie University, said “it’s important to look into this for the Canadian public,” citing an August Angus Reid study in which 78 per cent of Canadians said they believe grocery stores are taking advantage of inflation to make bigger profits. He said makes for a “dangerous threshold” of Canadians who believe there is abuse.


“A lot of people are losing faith here. And that’s a problem. And I think Parliamentarians should actually look into this,” he said.

NDP leader Jagmeet Singh told reporters Tuesday corporate grocery profits and bonuses are “clear evidence” that “something beyond the understandable” is driving the price hikes.

Singh said if the prices were simply increasing to “match the increased costs, you wouldn’t be seeing the bonuses and the record profits.” He added that while there are other areas where inflation is coming down, that’s not happening with food prices.

“All these things paint a picture that clearly there’s something going on,” he said. Singh pointed to the 2018 bread-price-fixing scandal as precedent.

But, Singh said, “it could just be as simple as corporate greed. It doesn’t have to be any more nefarious, but that is deeply a problem.”

Related video: Business Report: Canada slipping in grocery affordable ranking
Duration 3:39  View on Watch



The price of food is rising at the fastest rate in 40 years
cbc.ca

Charlebois said there have now been “thirteen straight months, when the food inflation rate exceeded the general inflation in Canada. People are spooked at the grocery store. They’re wondering what’s going on.”

He added that given the bread price-fixing scandal, “there’s baggage there, which certainly would make some of the criticism deserved.”

Asked what profits the NDP is using as a basis for its claims, a spokesperson pointed to numbers from the most recent financial reports from Loblaw Companies, Empire Companies and Metro. They said Loblaw had $901 million in net profits in the first two quarters of 2022, up from $769 million in 2021. In the first three quarters of its 2022 fiscal year, Metro reported $680.8 million in 2022, up from $631.7 million in 2021. In its fiscal 2022, Empire reported a profit of $745.8 million, compared to $701.5 million the year before.

Loblaw has pointed to its drug retail division, which includes Shoppers Drug Mart, as the profit driver.

Charlebois said he looked into grocery chains’ profits and found that while profit numbers are going up, the percentages have been consistent over the past five years. “Two per cent five years ago does not look like two per cent today,” he said. He said that his study, which looked at Empire, Loblaw and Metro, didn’t find any evidence of “greedflation or abuse or profiteering at all in the last five years.”

But that doesn’t mean there aren’t questions about why prices of specific foods are going up, such as seafood, meat and bakery goods.

For example, future prices of beef have been down for a while, but retail prices are still going up. “That’s highly unusual,” he said. “Is it profiteering? Well, then let’s talk about this. Is it transportation? Is it consolidation?”

But he said a study needs to be holistic, looking at the whole system from farm to retail.

Rod MacRae, a retired associate professor at York University said Canada “has the most corporately concentrated food system in the Western world,” and it’s especially concentrated at the retail level.

He said that “creates the possibilities for the retailers to control price.”

MacGregor said he wants to committee to hear from the major grocery chains, a variety of economists, unions, and consumer advocates on the issue.

“I think the onus is on the grocery chains to be a little bit more upfront with Canadians,” he said. “All Canadians can see is basically what’s in front of them, week in, week out. They can see the huge… increases.”

The motion could have support from the other parties on the committee. Asked whether Conservative MPs on the committee will support the motion, the office of committee vice-chair John Barlow said he couldn’t comment on a motion he hasn’t yet seen, but that agricultural committee members “have had a long history of supporting studies proposed by members, regardless of party affiliation.”

Liberal MP Kody Blois said that he would hold his opinion until he’s seen exactly what’s included in the motion, but that there is “merit” to the issue that’s being raised.

When it studies an issue, a parliamentary committee’s primary role is to make recommendations to government, Blois noted. “But there’s nothing stopping the committee, if it felt that there was some type of behavior that was requiring further investigation, to have letters sent…trying to encourage federal agencies to take action.”

Charlebois said Parliament can “politicize the issue, and make sure that penalties are operationalized through agencies, like in this case, the Competition Bureau.”

Palestinian authorities denounce the death of a child while «fleeing occupation forces».

Daniel Stewart -

Palestinian authorities denounced Thursday the death of a seven-year-old boy after he fell from a high point while "fleeing from the occupation forces" on the outskirts of the West Bank town of Tekoa.


File - Israeli soldiers near the separation fence on the outskirts of the West Bank city of Jenin. - 
Ilia Yefimovich/dpa© Provided by News 360

The Municipality of Tekoa indicated in a brief message on its Facebook account that the boy is Rayan Yaser Ali Suleiman and added that he was fleeing from soldiers "of the occupation army" who were "chasing students".

The death was confirmed by the Palestinian Ministry of Health, which said through Facebook that the boy was admitted to the Beit Jala Public Hospital, where he died "after falling from a high point while being chased by occupation forces".

According to information provided by Israeli Army Radio, the boy had thrown stones at several soldiers and fell when the soldiers were trying to stop him. The Army has stressed that it is investigating the incident.
Granddaughter's handcuffing haunts Indigenous man, even as police settle rights case


VANCOUVER — Maxwell Johnson is still haunted by the helplessness he felt watching his then 12-year-old granddaughter get handcuffed outside a bank almost three years ago, even after accepting a settlement in their human rights complaint against the Vancouver Police Board.



Johnson signed a deal to settle the case at a news conference on Wednesday.

The Heiltsuk Nation artist and his granddaughter, now 15, were wrongly detained and handcuffed by police after visiting a Bank of Montreal branch in Vancouver in December 2019 to open an account for the girl.

A bank employee phoned 911 after mistakenly suspecting that their Indian status cards were fake.

A statement from the Heiltsuk Nation called it a "unique and impactful" settlement that involves an apology for discrimination, undisclosed damages to Johnson's family and a $100,000 payment to fund the nation’s restorative justice department.

The police board will hold an apology ceremony at the Heiltsuk’s big house in Bella Bella on B.C.'s central coast next month, and develop a plan over two years to improve police training on anti-Indigenous racism, "cultural humility" and competency.

The statement says the police board will also hire an anti-Indigenous-racism officer to review complaints.

Johnson said he was pleased with the resolution of the Human Rights Tribunal case, but his family is still in a healing process.

“One of the things I kept seeing is my granddaughter standing on the street, crying while she's been handcuffed," he said.

“I don't think any parent or grandparent should ever see that in their lifetime … all I could do was just stand there and not do anything. I will never get that image out of my head,” said Johnson, who wept after speaking.

Related video: Heiltsuk man, granddaughter handcuffed outside Vancouver bank settle with police
Duration 3:25 View on Watch

Johnson’s granddaughter, Tori-Anne, said she hoped her story could encourage more people to stand up against injustice and discrimination. Johnson's lawyer, Sabrina Zhu, asked the media not to use the girl's surname.

Tori-Anne said the handcuffing occurred during a family trip to Vancouver "when we were supposed to be making good memories together."

"Instead, what happened to me and my grandfather traumatized me. I'm still healing from that day," she said.

“I also want to tell everyone, especially Indigenous kids, to be strong and speak out when they face discrimination. I hope that my grandfather and I helped you feel like you can speak up and be heard when you experience injustice.”

As part of the settlement, the police board admitted officers had discriminated against Johnson and his granddaughter based on their Indigenous identities.

The police board's payment to the Heiltsuk First Nation's restorative justice department will fund community programming for at-risk young women.

An additional $20,000 payment will be made to reimburse the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs for expenses related to the case.

The Vancouver Police Board said in a statement that it was committed to taking positive and collaborative steps to "create a more meaningful relationship with Indigenous communities."

“The Board recognizes the significance of the settlement we have reached with Mr. Maxwell Johnson and his granddaughter," it said.

"We are looking forward to this opportunity to work in partnerships with the groups involved by reviewing and improving a range of culturally sensitive and relevant practices and policies, in particular those focused on Indigenous people."

Johnson will give an artwork to the police board at the Bella Bella ceremony on Oct. 24.

The Union of B.C. Indian Chief's legal counsel, Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond, called the settlement "historic and path-breaking".

Johnson announced in May that he had reached an agreement with the bank that included an undisclosed payment from BMO, a private apology and a pledge to update the bank's policies on how status cards are handled.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 28, 2022.

Nono Shen, The Canadian Press