Monday, June 26, 2023

GEORGIA; THE COUNTRY
Chiatura miners’ strike ends after company caves on key demands

 26 June 2023
By Mariam Nikuradze
OC MEDIA
Miners concluded their protest outside the parliament on 24 June. Photo: Mariam Nikuradze/OC Media.

A strike by manganese miners in the central Georgian town of Chiatura has come to an end after 18 days, with the mining company agreeing to key demands from the workers.

On Saturday, mining firm Georgian Manganese agreed to reverse new ore quotas that miners had described as ‘inhuman’. They also agreed to honour their contractual obligation to increase salaries by 12%, in line with inflation.

The miners went on strike after the company announced that workers would have to mine up to 40% more ore over shorter shifts. Both miners and labour activists said such demands were impossible to meet and would effectively result in a pay cut for miners.

The mines will resume work from 1 July.


The company also agreed to honour their legal obligation to provide paid holidays and sick leave. They also promised to reimburse strike days at 60% pay and to improve safety conditions in the mines.

A commission consisting of representatives of the company, workers, trade unions, and government officials will also be set up to decide on a range of other complaints, including improving health insurance, better safety equipment, and deferring bank loans for employees.
Advertisements

The strike began on 8 June and on 12 June, 10 miners went on a hunger strike. They were joined by an eleventh person several days later who sewed his mouth shut, while another sewed his eyes shut.

As negotiations faltered, a portion of the miners travelled to the capital Tbilisi on 19 June, where four more miners started a hunger strike the next day.


After the deal was reached, Tariel Mikatsadze, one of the striking workers, addressed those gathered outside parliament and reminded those gathered that they were originally demanding a 40% raise.

‘Considering that our friends are on a hunger strike for the 13th day, that we are on strike for the 19th day, we decided to agree to an 11.9% increase according to the inflation’, he said, adding that this proved that increasing their salaries was not their only principal demand.

Several of the protesters outside parliament told OC Media that given that some of the miners were putting their health at risk in the hunger strike, this was the bare minimum they could agree to
.
Tariel Mikatsadze. Photo: Mariam Nikuradze/OC Media.

Mikatsadze said that it was now crucial to ensure the company also fulfils the remaining demands, which will be discussed in the new commission.

‘If the same thing happens as happened after the mass strike in 2019, if they lie to us again, if they drag these issues over time, we will need your support again’, he added.

The Social Justice Center, a local rights group that assisted the workers during the strike, warned that the agreement did not include certain issues that Georgian Manganese was legally obliged to resolve.

‘Unfortunately, such basic issues as improving the daily meals of miners, restoring the functionality of the sanatorium, resolving loan interest issues with the bank, and renewing equipment to protect labour safety were subjected to commission work.’

‘These issues concern the protection of labour rights at the basic level and they need to be seen in a legal perspective and immediately enforced and ensured’, the statement read.

The miners left Tbilisi on the evening of 24 June, with those who were on a hunger strike transferred to a hospital to recover.

Georgian Manganese also issued a statement confirming that the company would increase raise salaries according to inflation, something they previously agreed to in the collective agreement signed with workers in 2019.

Why the far right is trying to infiltrate a miners’ strike in Georgia

 23 June 2023
By Mariam Nikuradze
OC MEDIA
A group of striking miners from Chiatura outside the parliament building in Tbilisi. Photo: Mariam Nikuradze/OC Media.

Manganese miners from the central Georgian town of Chiatura have for weeks been on strike over their working conditions. But since a portion of the strikers moved their protest to the capital Tbilisi, far-right figures have been seen attempting to ingratiate themselves into the protests, leaving the miners unsure who to trust.

When several dozen striking miners and their supporters arrived in Tbilisi on 19 June, their intention was to bring wider attention to their cause. And the strike resonated with many Georgians, especially as images of miners who had sewn shut their mouths in despair emerged.

Some of those to join their demonstration in solidarity were young people who previously protested, and defeated, the government’s planned foreign agent law.

One was Lucas Ablotia. Along with several of his friends, Ablotia was outside the parliament demonstrating in support of Lazare Grigoriadis when the miners arrived in Tbilisi.

‘We learned that miners were protesting inhuman treatment, including violations of labour rights. Obviously, I wanted to express solidarity and would stand with them as a citizen’, Ablotia told OC Media.

Ablotia was draped in an EU flag and held Georgian and Ukrainian flags. ‘We always stand at protests like this’, he said.
Advertisements

But Ablotia and his friends weren’t welcomed with open arms.

‘Several people approached me and spoke to me in a bad tone, that I was ruining this protest because I stood with the EU flag, that the EU is depraved, that Ukraine started the war and it’s Ukraine’s fault what is happening in Ukraine.’

‘They accused me of being a supporter of Misha [former President Mikheil Saakashvili]. They told me that Misha started the war in 2008, and things like that.’

‘It is not safe to be there anymore. They threaten us, they yell at us. They told me I am a Mishisti faggot and things like this.’

In the following days, the young people did not attend the miners’ demonstration.

But Ablotia is not sure who it was that was harassing them. At least one was scolding them ‘in the name of the miners’, he said.

‘We spotted some fascist groups there’, he added.
Extremists at the picket line

While following the miners’ strike in Tbilisi, OC Media identified at least five people affiliated with the far-right extremist group Alt Info hanging around the protest. On several occasions, we overheard them attempting to discredit the young people present, often using homophobic language.

One was Giorgi Odzelashvili, who marched with the miners from parliament to the offices of the mining firm, Georgian Manganese.

Odzelashvili participated in the attack on the Tbilisi Pride office during the 5 July 2021 homophobic riots. He is active on Facebook, especially on a page called ‘Conscience Boys’, which advocates for the release of the handful of people arrested over the 5 July violence.

Giorgi Odzelashvili at the miners’ strike in Tbilisi on 20 June (left, photo: Mariam Nikuradze/OC Media) and attacking the offices of Tbilisi Pride on 5 July 2021
 (Photo: Euronews Georgia).

Another is Irakli Khomasuridze, a familiar face at violent far-right demonstrations.

In June 2022 Khomasuridze was convicted of attacking liberal politicians Khatuna Samnidze and Davit Berdzenishvili. He also threatened OC Media’s director and journalist, Mariam Nikuradze, at a protest outside Tbilisi City Court where some of those arrested over the 5 July violence were on trial.

Irakli Khomasuridze at the miners’ protest on 20 June 2023 (left) and outside the Tbilisi City Court in April 2022, protesting the conviction of people arrested for 5 July violence. Photos: Mariam Nikuradze/OC Media.

Zaza Mchedlidze, who was convicted of attacking journalists on 5 July, was also spotted at the miners’ protest.

Zaza Mchedlidze at miners’ protest (left) and during the 5 July pogroms.
 Photos: Natia Amiranashvili/Publika, Tabula.

Gocha Surameli and Ramin Abesadze, both affiliated with Alt Info, were also present at the miners’ protest. Both were broadcasting live coverage and interviewing some of the miners.Gocha Surameli at the miners’ strike in Tbilisi (left, photo: Mariam Nikuradze/OC Media) and posing with the ‘Conscience Boys’ advocating the release of people arrested for the 5 July riots (image via Facebook).

Ramin Abesadze at the miners’ protest (left) and campaigning for the far-right Georgian Idea Party. Photos via Facebook.

Prominent far-right campaigner Guram Palavandishvili was also spotted by others at the miners’ demonstration.

Guram Palavandishvili at the miners’ protest and on 6 July 2021 at a homophobic protest. 
Photos: Lucas Ablotia and Mariam Nikuradze/OC Media.

Do the miners support the far right?

OC Media collected photos of the far-right figures at the Tbilisi protest and showed them to some of the miners outside parliament to ask if they knew any of these people.

The miners recognised all of them but said they did not know them, and tried to distance themselves from the men.

Indeed, on 20 June, OC Media witnessed far-right campaigner Irakli Khomasuridze telling the miners to distance themselves from friends of Lazare Grigoriadis, the 21-year-old on trial for his role in the March protests. Khomasuridze was heard telling the miners that they were ‘faggots’ and ‘foreign agents’. In response, the miners told Khomasuridze to leave.

We also asked the miners what they thought of Konstantine Morgoshia, one of the leaders of Alt Info, who wrote on Facebook expressing support for the strike.

‘He is also one of those swine businessmen, yes’, one of them responded.

‘He is the leader of [Alt Info] and we are calling everyone to do business in the correct way. But a person like him, how can he stand next to us when he is doing the same [as the mining company]?’

‘We try not to get such people close to us’, he added.

Salome Shubladze is the director of social policy at a local rights group, the Social Justice Centre. The centre has long advocated for the miners in Chiatura and elsewhere in the country, and provides legal aid to them.

Shubladze told OC Media that she also noticed members of Alt Info at the miners’ protests, recalling one instance in which they criticised young people for their appearance.

‘They told them: “why are you wearing an earring, believe in Christ”. They responded that they came to express solidarity, but this man told them to believe in Christ first’, she recalled.

She said that the young people then asked the miners if they knew who this person was, which they said they didn’t.

The incident was one of those recounted by Lucas Ablotia that deterred him and his friends from continuing to attend the miners’ strike.

‘There was aggression towards others too’, he said, ‘including one person with earrings; they said they wouldn’t allow men with earrings close, that they’d beat them. There were threats like this towards people who looked different, who had dyed hair or colourful accessories. They kicked out many people very aggressively.’

Shubladze added that this was not the first time far-right groups had attached themselves to such protests, recalling the Namakhvani HPP dam protests.

‘Alt Info were chasing after young people who were not necessarily dressed in a conventional way. We see the same thing here’, she said.

And unlike the young people, who did not express any motivation other than solidarity for joining with the miners, ‘chasing after young people’ certainly seems to have been a primary motivation for the far right.

Giorgi Odzelashvili, one of the far-right campaigners spotted at the protest, posted a photo on Facebook on 19 June of a young man with a rainbow bag. It is unclear if the photo was even taken during the miners’ protest, but Odzelashvili claimed it was, stating that there were ‘a lot of faggots’ gathered there.

He urged supporters to join him while hinting at his violent intentions, telling his followers they should not be surprised if he were arrested.

Disappointment

The conflicts has left many of the miners distrustful of everyone and anyone without a personal connection to Chiatura.

Time and again, the miners who spoke to OC Media said their goal was simply to realise their right to just and dignified employment.

Thousands of miners are on strike in Chiatura over their work conditions, with a handful having gone on hunger strike. 
Photo: Mariam Nikuradze/OC Media.
The striking workers have organised daily marches through Chiatura. 
Photo: Mariam Nikuradze/OC Media.

They said that many people had come to them, sometimes with pictures, sometimes with stories about specific people, telling them that they should avoid them. As a result, they no longer knew who to believe.

‘In the end, we decided not to let anyone close to our tribune. No one will be able to stand at the microphone except us’, one of them said.

Despite the confusion, they said they still wanted support.

‘We want many people to come and we want to let these people understand our problems as clearly as possible’, they said.

But the far-right presence has had an impact, with Ablotia and others saying they no longer felt safe attending.

The Social Justice Centre’s Salome Shubladze echoed suspicions among some that this may have been the point all along.

‘Obviously, when there are violent groups at a protest, some people will avoid going.’

While she said there was not enough evidence to link these groups directly to the government, it was visible that Alt Info’s goals were often in unison with those of the government.

‘This is why we do not rule out that this group is being used to weaken and divide the protest, and to fragment and remove the support which this protest still has.’

For now, as their strike continues unabated, many of the miners have been left disillusioned with their journey to the capital.

Giorgi Kupatadze, who had sewed his eyes shut as part of the strike because he ‘doesn’t want to watch this injustice anymore’, arrived in Tbilisi to join the protest on 20 June. He left the next day, stating that he had hoped to gain more attention to their plight.

‘I am leaving this place very heartbroken’, Publika cited him as saying.



By Mariam Nikuradze
Mariam is a veteran journalist with over 10 years experience under her belt. She is passionate about gender equality and workers’ rights. Despite now being shackled behind a desk for most of the time, she can never sit still when something is happening and always goes to report from the ground. Mari lives with her cat Willie, who she is training to be a dog.



The Unfortunate Irony of Meta’s EU Troubles and the Case of TikTok

By Ania Zolyniak 
LAWFARE
Monday, June 26, 2023

A cell phone on a table. (https://unsplash.com/photos/Xh3k8-vfl8s)

On Jan. 4, Meta was fined 390 million euros (approximately $414 million) for illegally forcing European Union users to accept personalized ads on Facebook and Instagram. The fine was issued by the Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC), which serves as Meta’s main regulator in Europe (the company’s European operations are headquartered out of Ireland for tax purposes). The commission gave Meta three months to comply with EU data privacy protection under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) after finding that it could not use the law’s contractual necessity clause as a workaround for collecting and processing user digital activity for targeted advertising. Essentially, Meta couldn’t rely on its notoriously opaque terms of service agreements to justify targeted ads for EU users. Rather, Facebook and Instagram had to provide users with a way to opt out of having their digital activity collected and used to tailor the advertisements they saw on the apps. This will likely have significant financial implications for the company: In 2022, Meta made $113.64 billion in advertising revenue, almost a quarter of which came from Europe. At the time the decision was issued, the New York Times reported that it jeopardized 5 to 7 percent of Meta’s overall advertising revenue.

On May 22, the DPC fined Meta again, this time for breaking EU privacy laws when transferring EU user data from Europe to the United States. In addition to the record $1.3 billion fine, the commission ordered Meta to suspend all transfers of personal data belonging to EU users and users within the European Economic Area to the United States. In this case, the DPC’s main concern was whether Facebook specifically provided enough “appropriate safeguards” when transferring EU user data to the United States, which is a much more relaxed data privacy regulatory environment, particularly when it comes to U.S. foreign intelligence collection programs. The case stems from a 2020 decision issued by the European Court of Justice that struck down the Privacy Shield—a 2016 U.S.-EU agreement that allowed businesses in both jurisdictions to more easily transfer data across the Atlantic—and is the latest development in a decade-old campaign to protect European citizens’ data from U.S. surveillance. Indeed, the commission explicitly noted that its decision “exposes a situation whereby any internet platforms falling within the definition of an electronic communications service provider subject to the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act 702 PRISM program may equally fall foul” of GDPR safeguards for data transfers.

Fear of a foreign government gathering intelligence on citizens through a social media platform is surely familiar to the United States. Indeed, the concerns regarding foreign surveillance inherent in the commission’s May 22 decision against Meta seem to echo those of U.S. lawmakers’ vis-a-vis the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and TikTok. Despite causing some inconveniences for multinational companies handling data across international borders, Europe’s response to these concerns through instruments like the GDPR offers U.S. officials a more practical model than pervious nonce bans for realistically and effectively addressing related fears involving U.S. citizens and national security.

The Case of TikTok

In calling to order the House of Representatives’s Energy and Commerce Committee hearing on March 23, Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.) told TikTok CEO Shou Chew that he had been invited to testify before the committee “because the American people need the truth about the threat TikTok poses to [their] national and personal security.” According to Congress, Chew was there because “TikTok surveils us all,” pointing to alleged “internal records reveal[ing] … a backdoor for China to access user data.”

In his written testimony, Chew claimed that ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, “is not an agent of China” and that “there is no way for the Chinese government to access [U.S. user data] or compel access to it.” However, an ex-ByteDance executive, who had filed a wrongful dismissal suit in February against the company, alleged that the CCP was able to access U.S. TikTok user data through a “backdoor channel in the code.” The concern regarding CCP access to U.S. user data stems from two Chinese national security laws. The first, the 2014 Counter-Espionage Law, states that “when the state security organ investigates and understands the situation of espionage and collects relevant evidence, the relevant organizations and individuals shall provide it truthfully and may not refuse.” Under the second, the 2017 National Intelligence Law, “any organization or citizen shall support, assist and cooperate with the state intelligence work in accordance with the law.”

In response to concerns for EU citizens’ privacy and the security of their information, which largely came to the fore after Edward Snowden’s 2013 leaks, EU lawmakers drafted comprehensive legislation that erected safeguards for Europeans’ data in the EU and beyond. Rather than seeking a similar path toward thorough privacy protections for Americans, the U.S. government has instead zeroed in on a designated “boogeyman” for all digital data collection and security concerns: a proposed national ban on a single application used by over 150 million Americans.

In December 2020, then-President Trump attempted to ban TikTok via executive order—he was unsuccessful. In May, Montana banned TikTok from operating in the state in the interest of protecting “Montanans’ personal, private, and sensitive data and information from intelligence gathering by the Chinese Communist Party.” It appears, however, that Montana’s ban may not work out as the state intended. Ironically, if TikTok attempts to comply with the ban, it would have to start collecting precise user location data to determine in which state they are using the app. According to the Council on Foreign Relations’s Tarah Wheeler, doing so would create “a surveillance state that includes fine-grained location data and the ability to monitor and read people’s phones—the exact mirror of the Chinese surveillance state they’re afraid of to begin with.”

President Biden, for his part, issued his own executive order in October of last year concerning data privacy and protection: Executive Order 14086. The order provides a new framework for safeguarding personal data … transferred from Europe to the United States. The order primarily addresses European concerns regarding improperly obtained data through U.S. signals intelligence activities (from which U.S. citizens are, at least in principle, supposed to already be protected) rather than the commercial activities. Nevertheless, it lays out a clearer structure for review, requirements, and redress that could be recycled and tailored into legislation that could better secure the data privacy of American citizens than chasing after problem apps with bans.

Why a Ban Just Won’t Cut It

If protecting user data is indeed a critical matter of national security, then lawmakers should treat it as such. Rather than seeking legal justifications (and technological conjurations) to try to ban a single platform used by millions of Americans, U.S. policymakers could pursue comprehensive legislation that provides internet users explicit rights over the collection, processing, use, and movement of their data, as well as legal recourse for abuses. And they wouldn’t have to start from scratch: Multiple countries—be it Australia, Canada, South Africa, or the members of the EU—and even some U.S. states offer convenient case studies for discerning which and what kind of provisions would be most desirable for protecting U.S. citizens’ data in the U.S. context across multiple platforms and applications. TikTok data is not and should not be Americans’ only security concern regarding social media: The very nature of the internet, which is diffuse and open by design; the sheer amount of information generated and collected across digital platforms; and the lack of comprehensive federal data regulation put all U.S. digital data at risk.

With or without a TikTok ban, Americans’ digital data is still up for sale. The Biden administration’s warning to TikTok earlier this year that it may face a national ban if ByteDance fails to sell its stake in the U.S. version of the app is reminiscent of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States’s 2019 decision to mandate the Chinese owners of Grindr, a dating app, to sell it back to a U.S. firm. As Justin Sherman argued in a 2022 Lawfare piece, although the owners conceded and sold the application to San Vicente Acquisition, a low-profile investment group, doing so did nothing to prevent Grindr from legally selling its data to governments through data brokers or from sharing user data with third parties, including through a Chinese software development kit. Thus, even if TikTok acquiesces to the administration’s demands and sells its stake, such divestment wouldn’t necessarily prevent the Chinese or another foreign government from obtaining U.S. user data through the open market.

In addition to the data up for sale, there is the potluck of U.S. citizens’ information available for free. In April 2015, Facebook’s Mark Zuckerburg told Congress that the company would end its policy of granting applications created on the platform unrestricted access to user data in May of that year. In 2018, however, Facebook (now Meta) revealed that it allowed apps developed by Mail.ru Group, a Russian technology conglomerate with ties to the Kremlin, to operate under the more permissive pre-May 2015 rules for two weeks beyond the designated cut-off date. Doing so allowed the apps to collect data by delving deep into profiles and tracking activity unbeknownst to Facebook users, who were ultimately left exposed to and unprotected from such abuse due to the lack of U.S. privacy regulations. Facebook declined to comment on its determinations regarding what Mail.ru may have done with the data. Its reason? Confidentiality and privacy concerns between the company and app developers.

Foreign adversaries are not the only ones accessing U.S. data: In 2017, engineers working for the athletic social networking app Strava created and published a heat map of anonymized user training data. After reviewing the map, an Australian grad student posted his revelations about the data on Twitter in 2018: His data visualization revealed—and mapped—the locations of forward-deployed U.S. bases (as well as military forces of other countries) and an undisclosed CIA site in Djibouti.

In her comparative assessment of data risks in the United States, Canada, and Germany, Susan Ariel Aaronson, a senior fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation, examined the case of FaceApp, which took the United States by storm after its release in 2017. At the time of the report’s writing (April 2020), about 80 million users had downloaded FaceApp, an image editing application developed by the Russian company Wireless Lab that went viral for its “old” face filter. Upon downloading the app, users granted FaceApp “a fully paid, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, non-exclusive, and fully sublicensable right and license to use, reproduce, perform, display, distribute, adapt, modify, re-format, create derivative works of, and otherwise commercially or non-commercially exploit in any manner, any and all Feedback, and to sublicense the foregoing rights, in connection with the operation and maintenance of the Services and/or FaceApp’s business.” In non-term-and-conditions legalese: They essentially signed away their rights to their data and allowed FaceApp to do whatever it wanted with it.

In 2019, the FBI reviewed the app as part of a larger national security investigation into Russian-made software, concluding that the app was “a potential counterintelligence threat based on the data [it] collects, its privacy and terms of use [policies], and the legal mechanism available to the Government of Russia that permit access to data within Russia’s borders.” It remains unclear whether the app is indeed an arm of the Russian government; however, Aaronson points out that the company’s terms of service “give it great power to control the information it collects” and that it plans to continue selling it. She also points to U.S. companies such as Clearview AI that are “scraping the web and selling personal profiles to police authorities in both democratic and repressive states.” According to Aaronson, “America’s failure to enact clear personal data protection rules has enabled firms to obtain and monetize personal data for a wide range of current and future purposes.”

Yes, the United States could try to force the sale of FaceApp or threaten to ban it. But waiting to take formidable action after a new app pops up in stores, becomes wildly popular across the country, collects and stores vast quantities of user data, and is assessed by the FBI to be a national security risk is not a national data security strategy: It is a Sisyphean game of whack-a-mole.

If personal and national security concerns are not enough to cajole congressional support and action, it is also worth mentioning that a clearly articulated national framework of data regulation in the United States also has advantages for business interests by providing countries with a more consistent standard. As Robert D. Williams of the Brookings Institution and Yale Law School notes, such a standard would reduce compliance costs and mitigate inefficiencies arising from the adoption of different regulatory schemes by individual U.S. states. It would also promote the harmonization of the U.S. operational data environment “with those of other major economies, easing trade concerns and promoting American technology in Europe and beyond.”

A Reality Check

While the GDPR may fuel Meta’s ire, it should be the object of envy for the American social media consumer. Even China has its own version of the GDPR, the 2021 Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL), with data collection consent requirements and protections for data transfers similar to those at issue in the aforementioned cases involving Meta’s European operations. Of course, the differences in political realities in China versus those in the EU cannot and should not be ignored. Despite its similarities on paper to the GDPR, the PIPL’s de facto execution will depend wholly on how the CCP elects to implement its provisions in furtherance of the party’s interests, including its increasing desire to exert expanded surveillance and control over its populations’ digital activities. Still, the larger point remains that as comprehensive national data protection laws are becoming the norm, the United States’ lack of an overarching, nationwide legal architecture for protecting U.S. internet user data that regulates private companies rather than banning problematic platforms retroactively—and only after a critical threat is detected—sticks out like a sore thumb. The United States’ lateness to the game, however, offers U.S. policymakers a vast repository of models from which they could pick and choose in crafting harmonizing legislation that protects U.S. netizens and reduces aforementioned private-sector costs of doing business in a fractured global data policy landscape. Many countries that have followed the way of the EU in enacting data privacy laws have borrowed from the GDPR, but there are serious concerns that ought to be deliberated and debated regarding challenges to its implementation and lacunae that continue to threaten user privacy despite the legal regime’s stringency. U.S. policymakers thus have the advantage of accessing the successes and failures of the GDPR and other countries’ policies. Importantly, however, that doesn’t mean that U.S. legislatures can simply continue to kick the can down the road, relying on ineffective and perforated bans while making zero progress on comprehensive legislation.

To comply with the January ruling from the EU Commission, Meta changed its model to permit users to opt out of targeted ads—but only in Europe. European Instagram and Facebook users now have a mechanism, as cumbersome as it may be, to reclaim greater control over their digital information. As an American Facebook user, all I can say is that it must be nice. But at least now the CCP might not be able to get Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte’s data—at least not for free.
Experts: El Nino (and Food Industry Upheaval) is Coming

KELLY BEATON AND BRITTANY BORER | JUNE 16, 2023


Everyone knows “El Nino” by now – hot weather. Big winds. And once again in 2023, much of the world will gain a better grasp of this unpredictable meteorological phenomenon.

El Nino generally refers to a warming of the ocean surface, or above-average surface sea temperatures, in the central and eastern Pacific Ocean– but the phenomenon could have a widespread impact soon, especially on the food industry.

“The opinion of several experts suggests that this El Nino will be stronger than before due to global warming, resulting in higher temperatures than those previously experienced with this phenomenon,” Sara Galeano, director of sustainability at GoodSAM Foods, told The Food Institute.

“Unfortunately, El Nino is a phenomenon that can last for months.”

The arrival of the first El Nino in almost four years foreshadows new damage to an already fragile global economy. The shift to a warming phase from the cooler La Niña can generate chaos, especially in fast-growing emerging economies, as the world struggles to recover from Covid-19 and Russia’s war in Ukraine grinds on, as Bloomberg recently reported.

“Vulnerable regions heavily reliant on rain-fed agriculture are particularly susceptible to the negative impacts of El Nino,” Alison Friel, director of consulting at NSF, told The Food Institute. “In particular, winter crops in Asia and palm oil and rice in the Far East. American growers are hoping for heavier rainfall to alleviate the effects of the previous drought.”

AT-RISK F&B ITEMS


The heralded El Nino event is cause for concern, especially for some coffee farmers. While it remains unclear exactly how El Nino will unfold, it could bring unusually hot and dry conditions to coffee regions, which threatens coffee bean yields, The Washington Post reported. Arabica coffee beans are hypersensitive to temperature changes.

Meanwhile, the world’s rice glut will be put to the test with El Nino’s return. The world is awash in rice with global stockpiles at close to record levels, but El Nino-related weather usually brings hotter and drier conditions to Asia, which produces and consumes 90% of the global rice supply, Bloomberg noted.

Fisheries are also at risk. El Nino patterns often disrupt marine ecosystems, affecting the migration of fish, which can result in reduced catches that can throw the fishing industry into disarray.

“El Nino disrupts catch volumes,” Galeano noted. “Coastal regions may experience anomalies in sea levels and salinity, impacting aquaculture.”

AN UPTICK IN STORMS?


El Nino weather typically supports the warm, Pacific jet stream dipping further south than normal. This can lead to rounds of storms, flooding in parts of the southern U.S., as well as abnormally warm and dry conditions in the Pacific Northwest.

Weather patterns have been changing rapidly in recent years, which leaves the world navigating new territory when it comes to climate patterns.

These weather extremes are arriving fast and furious and last longer than ever before.

Wildfires, floods, tropical cyclones, and extreme temperature fluctuations will impact the food industry – from farming, to production, to shipping – as El Nino is expected to strengthen into this winter. Colombia’s Institute of Hydrology, Meteorology, and Environmental Studies said its forecasts indicate that the first quarter of 2024 could be the peak period of El Nino’s intensity.

BUSINESSES BRACE FOR IMPACT

Food companies, including manufacturers and grocery chains, can take several steps to protect their businesses from the negative impacts of El Nino.

“Companies should implement water conservation strategies and prioritize the efficient use of this resource,” Galeano said. “This can include recovering water sources, (and) implementing irrigation systems that minimize water waste…”

And, as with any potential disruption to the food supply chain maintaining dialogue with a suppliers is key to adapt to changes in supply.

For example, Friel noted, “if sourcing organic wheat, can you source an alternative that’s also organic? … Ensure business departments such as procurement are looking ahead and planning for the possibility that traditional supply chains could be disrupted. Ensure your development teams look to change their formulations to reduce or remove at-risk ingredients.”

Kelly Beaton serves as The Food Institute’s chief content officer. Brittany Borer is FI’s digital content producer/reporter and has a Bachelor of Science degree in meteorology.
The Food Institute Podcast


Food price inflation has been a constant thorn over the past few years, but are we about to turn the corner toward greener pastures? Wells Fargo Chief Agricultural Economist Dr. Michael Swanson returned to The Food Institute Podcast to discuss emerging trends in food inflation and the changing dynamics between eating at home and eating out. Dr. Swanson also discusses agricultural impacts stemming from both drought and increased rainfall in different parts of the country.
END FREE SPEECH SAYS DIKTATOR










Turkey’s Erdogan demands Sweden stop Kurdish protests to consider NATO bid


President of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan gestures as he gives a press conference after the cabinet meeting at the Presidential Complex in Ankara, Turkey, on September 21, 2020. (AFP)

Tuqa Khalid, Al Arabiya English
Published: 25 June ,2023

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan told NATO’s Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg that Sweden had to stop protests by supporters of the Ankara-criminalized Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) in Stockholm if it wanted Turkey to approve its NATO membership.

“Turkey maintains its constructive stance regarding Sweden’s membership but that legislative amendments would be meaningless so long as PKK/PYD/YPG supporters organize demonstrations freely in this country,” according to a readout of the phone call between Erdogan and Stoltenberg.

Erdogan also stressed during the call, “the injustices faced within the context of the F-35s and the attempts to associate Turkey’s requests about the F-16s with Sweden’s membership would harm NATO and its security rather than Turkey.”

Stoltenberg said on Twitter he had a “good call” with Erdogan ahead of the upcoming NATO summit, where “important decisions on terrorism, deterrence and defense” will be taken. He added: “We will continue working together on Sweden’s accession to NATO.”

Turkey ratified Finland's NATO accession in late March, however, it raised objections to Sweden's membership, alleging that Stockholm supported Kurdish militants, namely the PKK, which Ankara deems a terrorist organization.



With the NATO leaders summit scheduled for mid-July in Lithuania, the membership of Sweden has emerged as a top priority for the alliance and the US.

The US had steadfastly denied the sale of advanced F-35 fighter jets to Turkey, a fellow NATO member, owing to Ankara’s decision to purchase the Russian S-400 air defense system. This acquisition was seen as a potential threat to the NATO alliance as it could expose vulnerabilities of the F-35s to the Russian system. As a result, Turkey was removed from the F-35 program in 2019.

Despite these complications, later discussions of a possible F-16 deal have emerged. The potential sale of F-16 fighter jets to Turkey is seen as an attempt to bolster their aging fleet while maintaining NATO interoperability, without jeopardizing the security of the advanced F-35 technology.

Turkey’s pursuit of billions of dollars’ worth F-16 deal has encountered delays due to objections raised by the US Congress, despite President Joe Biden’s administration expressing support for the sale.





Turkish journalist detained for saying Öcalan’s ‘isolation’ should be lifted

By Turkish Minute 
June 26, 2023

Journalist Merdan YanardaÄŸ, editor-in-chief of the Tele 1 TV station, was detained after criticizing the “isolation” imposed on the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party’s (PKK) jailed leader, Abdullah Öcalan, saying it should be lifted, local media reported on Monday.

The “isolation” of Öcalan, who has been jailed in a high-security prison on Ä°mralı Island in the Sea of Marmara since 1999, refers to his inability to speak with his lawyers for years.

YanardaÄŸ was detained on Monday as part of an investigation launched into him by the Ä°stanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office for his statements regarding Öcalan’s isolation during a program on Tele 1 over the weekend.

“The isolation imposed on Abdullah Öcalan has no place in the law. It should be lifted. He is unable to even meet with his family [members] and lawyer. … Öcalan is an extremely intelligent person who reads a lot of books and correctly understands … politics,” the journalist said.

The investigation was launched after Mehmet Ali Çelebi, a lawmaker from the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP), pointed to Yanardağ as a target by sharing a video on social media that was a compilation of what the journalist said in the program.


YanardaÄŸ was taken into custody by the counterterrorism police at the Tele 1 headquarters in Istanbul on charges of “praising crime and criminals” and “disseminating propaganda for a terrorist organization.”



Meanwhile, Radio and Television Supreme Council (RTÃœK) Chairman Ebubekir Åžahin announced on Twitter on Sunday that the council had launched an investigation into Tele 1 due to YanardaÄŸ’s statements which Åžahin said was praising “the terrorist leader who is responsible for the killings of thousands of people.”


Öcalan, who was given a life sentence for treason after Turkey removed the death penalty, has been barred from meeting with his legal representatives since 2011 with one exception and has had only limited family visits since the collapse of the settlement process in 2015.

The settlement process, which refers to talks between the AKP government and the leadership of the PKK to resolve the Kurdish issue, began in 2012 and ended after two police officers were executed in southeastern Şanlıurfa province in June 2015.

It is common for journalists in Turkey, which has a poor record on freedom of the press, to face threats, physical attacks and legal harassment due to their work.

Rights groups routinely accuse the Turkish government of trying to keep the press under control by imprisoning journalists, eliminating media outlets, overseeing the purchase of media brands by pro-government conglomerates and using regulatory authorities to exert financial pressure, especially since President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan survived a failed coup in July 2016.

Turkey is ranked 165th in the Reporters Without Borders (RSF) 2023 World Press Freedom Index, among 180 countries, not far from North Korea, which occupies the bottom of the list.






The Spirit of 1951

The EU’s asylum reform and Tunisia deal are merely the latest steps in its war on migrants



AUTHOR
Sofian Philip Naceur
NEWS | 06/26/2023
Migration / Flight - Europe - North Africa
Tunisian President Kais Saïed shakes hands with visiting German Interior Minister Nancy Faeser at the Carthage Palace in Tunis, Tunisia, 19 June 2023.Photo: IMAGO / Xinhua

The planned Common European Asylum System (CEAS) is not a new scandal, but the continuation of a policy that right-wing and social democratic parties have pursued for decades, effectively normalizing violence and death along the EU’s external borders. Scandalizing border externalization with recourse to humanitarian and legalistic rhetoric, as recently seen in Tunisia, no longer works — nor did it work against the arming of Libyan and Egyptian police authorities or militias in Sudan. We urgently need new narratives to fight back against border violence.

If the new, far-reaching regulation of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) is ratified in its current version, the fundamental right to asylum and the 1967 Protocol to the 1951 Geneva Convention will be undermined in an unprecedented manner. Effectively, the right to asylum will be de facto and de jure dismantled across the EU.

Left-wing and progressive voices have expressed shock and horror at the German government’s support of the “reform” alongside other liberal EU administrations, as well as the conclusion of a new border regime deal with Tunisia immediately thereafter — despite the fact that the 2021 coalition agreement between the three parties in the Berlin federal government clearly committed them to substantially undermining the right to asylum and expanding EU border externalization. For instance, the agreement states that asylum procedures in third countries should be “examined”.

Traditionally, outrage over the EU’s and its member states’ border externalization policies mostly targeted figures or parties in the right-wing and extreme right-wing political spectrum. But the current CEAS draft represents the logical continuation of policies pursued by social democratic and liberal parties for decades.

Concepts such as “migration management” — a euphemism for illegalizing refugees while at the same time systematically filtering migration movements according to the economic needs of European and other industrialized economies — were not developed solely in the conservative and right-wing camps. It is no coincidence that the Vienna-based International Center for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD), an organization pivotal in mainstreaming migration management concepts in Europe since its founding in the early 1990s, was chaired by a Swedish Social Democrat from 1993 to 2004.

The times when a humanitarian uproar could be sparked over such developments are over.

In Germany, the Social Democratic Party (SPD), in the opposition at the time, gave its parliamentary approval to the so-called “asylum compromise” back in 1993 alongside the neoliberal Free Democrats (FDP). This constitutional amendment is still regarded as the most far-reaching restriction of the fundamental right to asylum in German history.

The fact that SPD and FDP are now once again attempting to dismantle the right to asylum is therefore anything but surprising. In the early 1980s, SPD politicians warned of “floods of fake asylum seekers” and shamelessly advocated for “drastically restricting the right to asylum” and considering “limiting the right to asylum to citizens of European countries”. Forty-one years later, such “proposals” are now to become reality in the form of the CEAS — all that has changed is they toned down the racist rhetoric.

The Spirit of 1951


While the CEAS threatens to completely abolish individual asylum applications and could establish dangerous contingency regulations, we are now also witnessing a formal return to the origins of the architecture of contemporary international refugee law. The non-universal treatment of European refugees on the one hand and non-European refugees on the other, as was particularly blatant with the outbreak of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, sparked outrage here and there, but is in fact in line with the original spirit of the 1951 Geneva Convention.

After all, that convention was tailored exclusively to European refugees after World War II and only became universal law, applicable worldwide and for everyone, with the 1967 Protocol to the convention. The EU’s migration policy of the past decade, but especially since 2022, clearly demonstrates that the spirit of the 1951 Geneva Convention — and not that of the 1967 Protocol — continues to set the tone across the Union.

Border Violence in Tunisia

The fact that the arming of Libyan and Egyptian police authorities or militias in Sudan was imposed with hardly a whimper of protest clearly demonstrates that the language of humanitarianism and legalism fails when seeking to stir up outrage around border externalization deals like the most recent one with Tunisia. That said, the sheer scale of the new agreement with Tunisia’s increasingly authoritarian President Kais Saïed goes far beyond all previous police equipment and training programmes provided by the EU and its member states.

It was only a few months ago, in February 2023, that a statement by Saïed rife with racist agitation and absurd conspiracy theories triggered a weeks-long wave of violence against refugees and migrants across Tunisia, which has since pushed them to flee the North African country at unprecedented levels.

Meanwhile, the EU thanks Saïed for his violent and polemic stance against refugees and migrants by stabilizing his presidency in the form of political support, loans, budgetary aid, as well as police and surveillance equipment deliveries — at a time when the Ministry of the Interior in Tunis is re-emerging as a powerful anti-democratic force. The veritable exodus of refugees, now trying to reach safety on rickety boats headed for Italy in large numbers, continues unabated.

Failing to Spark an Uproar

The pattern is familiar: despite detailed, documented human rights crimes by Libyan authorities involved in anti-migration projects, the EU and its member states began equipping the so-called “Libyan Coast Guard” years ago. The same applies to the Egyptian police and intelligence services, notorious for their systematic human rights violations across the country, or the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a Sudanese militia responsible for serious crimes against humanity in Darfur in the 2000s and currently waging a bloody war across the country. Nevertheless, the RSF was incorporated into the EU border regime in North and East Africa.

If denouncing the torture practices of al-Sisi’s regime in Cairo, the violence against detained refugees by Libyan militias, or the crimes of the RSF fails to attract attention as it is, and some 600 deaths off the Greek coast in June vanish from headlines in only a few days, then trying to cause a scandal over border externalization deals with Tunisia and border violence in the country will not work, either. The times when a humanitarian uproar could be sparked over such developments are over.

We need new counter-strategies — against deals with autocrats, the CEAS, and the exclusionary understanding of refugee rights and protection currently being revived.

Sofian Philip Naceur is a project manager at the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation’s North Africa Office and works as a freelance journalist.
Ottawa air quality rising to 'very high risk' again due to forest fires

CGTN
 26-Jun-2023

Smoke from forest fires reaching to the center of Ottawa, Canada, June 25, 2023. /CFP

The air quality in the capital region of Canada started out bad and got worse over Sunday, rising to 10+ or "very high risk," the federal air quality index's highest level.

"High levels of air pollution have developed due to smoke from forest fires. Smoke plumes from forest fires in Quebec have moved into the area, resulting in deteriorated air quality," said Environment Canada in a special air quality statement.

In response, organizers of two out of the four major festivals in Ottawa have decided to cancel events, while the City of Ottawa has taken the step to cancel its outdoor programs and close wading and outdoor pools.

Air quality readings are expected to drop to a level seven on Monday, which is still a high risk, returning to a moderate risk at night.

Current weather conditions could worsen forest fires in Quebec and spark new ones, the Minister of Public Security announced on Saturday morning.

According to a statement from the ministry, several parts of the province are currently experiencing a flammability index ranging from "very high" to "extreme," indicating a significant risk of burning. The heightened risk is attributed to decreased levels of precipitation and rising temperatures, which have intensified the threat of forest fires.

Several regions are currently under close surveillance including Abitibi-Temiscamingue, the North Shore, northern Quebec and Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean.

SOPFEU, Quebec's forest fire agency, is actively engaged in combatting 81 fires across the province, with 25 of them being classified as out of control. Presently, the agency has prioritized its resources towards managing 43 fires.

Several municipalities have had to evacuate in the last few days, including some parts of the northwestern city of Senneterre. On Friday afternoon, authorities issued an evacuation order of 60 cottages in a rural area, around 30 kilometers north of the city centre.

Later in the day, evacuation orders were also issued for certain sectors of Beaucanton, Val-Paradis and Lac Pajegasque in the northwestern parts of the province.

According to the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre, there were five new wildfires burning in Canada on Sunday, bringing the total across the country this year to 2,880.

Wildfires have so far devoured about 74,000 square kilometers of land in Canada, making 2023 one of the worst years for wildfires on record, according to the center.

This year record fires have resulted in Canada deploying around 550 armed forces personnel and more than 1,700 international firefighters, paid for by the provinces, to beef up its stretched crews. As more wildfires threaten communities, provincial agencies are also increasingly leaning on structural firefighters to help protect homes.

But of the 126,000 structural firefighters in Canada, 90,000 are volunteers, according to the Canadian Association of Fire Chiefs, who are bearing the strain of protecting their own communities while also holding down day jobs.

(With input from agencies)

Montreal has worst air of any major city as wildfires rage: monitor

Agence France-Presse
June 26, 2023

A man surfs in the St. Lawrence river with smoke caused by wildfires in northern Quebec in the background in Montreal, Canada on June 25, 2023 (ANDREJ IVANOV)

Forest fires in Canada left Montreal blanketed with smog on Sunday, giving it the worst air quality of any major city in the world, according to a pollution monitor.

Quebec province's most populous city had 'unhealthy' air quality according to IQAir, which tracks pollution around the globe, as hundreds of wildfires burned across the country.

Environment Canada issued smog warnings in several Quebec regions due to the fires, saying, "high concentrations of fine particulate matter are causing poor air quality and reduced visibilities," with conditions to persist until Monday morning.

The agency urged residents to avoid outdoor activities and wear face masks if they must go outside.

Outdoor pools and sports areas have been closed and multiple outside events, including concerts and sports competitions, have been cancelled due to the unhealthy smog.

"It's really like a fog, except it's smoke from the forest fires. It's really hard to breathe, and it stings the eyes a bit too," said 18-year-old Fauve Lepage Vallee, lamenting that a festival she was due to attend had been cancelled.

There are 80 active forest fires in Quebec, according to Quebec's forest fire protection agency, SOPFEU, with several growing over the weekend due to dry weather and high temperatures.

"The extent of the smoke is making it particularly difficult for air tankers and helicopters to be effective," SOPFEU said.

However, "significant amounts" of rain are expected on Monday or Tuesday in the northwest of the province, it added.

On Wednesday, 119 French firefighters are due arrive in Quebec to relieve a contingent of their compatriots in the field since early June.

"They will also be deployed to Roberval," 250 kilometers (150 miles) north of Quebec City, for a 21 day mission, said Stephane Caron, a spokesman for SOPFEU.

Across the country, the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre (CIFFC) lists more than 450 active fires, some 240 of which are deemed out of control.

Canada is experiencing an unprecedented year of fires, with more than 7.4 million hectares burned since the beginning of January.

Montreal public health says air quality 5 times worse than before

Jun. 26, 2023, 8:35 AM

People with heart and lung conditions should stay inside, health experts say

Visit The Weather Network's wildfire hub to keep up with the latest on the active start to wildfire season across Canada.

Smoke from fires burning in northern Quebec has coated Montreal, again, leading to poor air quality that is five to six times worse than in early June, according to a medical director at Montreal Public Health.

Environment Canada reported that the air quality health index (AQHI) for Montreal was 10+ on Sunday, which corresponds to a "very high risk" level. It went down to nine on Monday, which corresponds to a "high health risk."

Wildfire smoke spreads fine particles in the air that can get in people's lungs and make it difficult to breathe. Breathing in these particles can lead to chest pain, headaches and a general feeling of being unwell.

SEE ALSO: Chibougamau mayor says town will not be evacuated due to forest fires Sunday

David Kaiser, a medical director at Montreal Public Health, said in an interview that people with heart and lung conditions are particularly vulnerable, but with this much smoke and pollution in the air, everyone can feel its effects.

"So you go for a jog yesterday morning or this morning, you may start to feel some chest tightness, some shortness of breath. That's a sign that probably should stop, get inside, take a break because like I said, at these levels anybody can start having those impacts," said Kaiser.

Stay indoors, wear a mask

Kaiser recommends people stay inside with doors and windows shut and the air conditioner running if possible. Avoiding exposure is key, he says.
Content continues below

Environment Canada recommends using an air purifier with a high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter air inside and wearing a well-fitted respirator-type mask outside.

It also recommends checking up on people who may be more vulnerable to smoke.

People should be aware of their mental health as it is normal to feel anxious or isolated during a smoke event, says Environment Canada.

Rain and thunderstorms forecast

Montreal is expecting showers and thunderstorms Monday and Tuesday, with a rainfall of about 20 to 40 millimetres expected.

The rain may help dissipate the fine particles and improve air quality. Environment Canada says Montreal's AQHI should go down to two on Tuesday, which represents a "low health risk."


This article was originally written by and published for CBC News, with files from Chloë Ranaldi.

IT'S NOT OVER YET
Op-Ed: Will Canadians bounce back after the worst wildfire season ever?

By Karen Graham
DIGITAL JOURNAL
Published June 24, 2023

The heating of the planet is turning landscapes into tinderboxes, and more extreme weather means stronger, hotter and drier winds to fan the flames - Copyright AFP Brendan SMIALOWSKI

Wildfires across Canada this year have burned 6.5 million hectares (16 million acres), raising concern over Canada’s ability to rebuild.

The 6.5 million hectares burned this year during the spring wildfire season is a figure higher than the entire 2016, 2019, 2020, and 2022 seasons combined, The Guardian is reporting.

Folks don’t want to be reminded, but warmer and drier months are still to come. Climate change and a warming planet have led to an elevated wildfire threat that appears to represent a new normal.

More extreme weather patterns make for harsher drought conditions, even in places such as Canada’s eastern seaboard, which is far less accustomed to wildfire fallout than other areas of the country.

Annual national wildfire protection and suppression costs topped C$1 billion for six of the last 10 years, according to federal government data, and have risen about C$150 million per decade since 1970.

The Tumbler Ridge Fire – The BC Wildfire Service continues to respond to the West Kiskatinaw River (G70645) and Peavine Creek (G70644) wildfires in the Dawson Creek Zone. These incidents both experienced aggressive fire behavior and growth over the past 24 hours.
 Source – BC Wildfire Service

Only scratching the surface

One billion dollars a year to fight wildfires is enough to make anyone sit up and take notice. But this figure is only scratching the surface. With over 200 structures destroyed by the fires and scores of people displaced for days on end, there is the human cost.

Modern Farmer suggests the downstream effects of wildfires are almost incalculable. Farmers have lost crops, been forced off their land for days at a time, and farmers’ markets were closed.

Another big concern is recruiting firefighters, and it is becoming increasingly difficult due to tight labor markets and the tough nature of the job, provincial officials say.

Limited resources could threaten Canada’s ability to fight fires, which are expected to get bigger and fiercer in the future, risking more damage to communities and disrupting the country’s oil and gas, mining, and lumber industries.

Now in all fairness, some of the burden in costs to farmers over a lost crop, or livestock is picked by the province – Nova Scotia delivered $2,500 emergency grants to its wildfire-affected farmers – and some by insurance carriers.

Insurance carriers are getting antsy over insurance payouts, and it is not just the loss of a house from a wildfire. There is flooding or extreme weather events to consider.
Lytton’s Welcome sign before the fire in 2021. 
Source – Andybremner2012, CC SA 4.0.

Yet much of the heavy lifting in the moment falls to local systems, community organizations, and friendly neighbors.

Not all communities are getting rebuilt. This leads to a collective failure to rebuild and raises questions about the preparedness of governments to respond to large crises.

Earlier this year, the Fraser Valley Current reported on the slow efforts to rebuild Lytton. The village “remains a flattened heap of dirt and concrete”, it reported, with much of the space fenced off.

Residents complained of bureaucratic delays and a feeling they had been forgotten. Work crews have found Indigenous artifacts at excavation sites, further slowing the process. As a result, next to nothing has been rebuilt yet.

Firefighters with Halifax Regional Fire and Emergency work to put out fires in the Tantallon area of Nova Scotia – Copyright Nova Scotia Government/AFP Handout

Firefighters needed desperately


A Reuters survey of all 13 provinces and territories showed Canada employs around 5,500 wildland firefighters, not including the remote Yukon territory, which did not respond to requests for information.

Mike Flannigan, a professor at Thompson Rivers University in British Columbia and a wildfire specialist says that’s roughly 2,500 firefighters short of what is needed.

“It’s hard work, it’s hot work, it’s smoky work, and there are real issues with health impacts longer-term,” Flannigan said. “It’s getting harder to recruit and retain people.”

Yes, firefighters have long days – 12 to 14 hours – up to two weeks at a time. The environment is smoke-filled, and high-stress, often in remote wilderness areas.

The seasonal work, longer fire seasons, and uncompetitive basic pay – ranging from C$30 ($22) an hour in British Columbia to C$.74 an hour in Manitoba – also deter people.

“We’re in competition with a whole bunch of other labor markets. It’s demanding physical work and it’s mentally taxing,” said Rob Schweitzer, executive director of BC Wildfire Service.

_______________________

Read more: https://www.digitaljournal.com/world/op-ed-will-canadians-bounce-back-after-the-worst-wildfire-season-ever/article#ixzz85jCp7GgN