Saturday, January 25, 2025

Survivors strive to ensure young do not forget Auschwitz


By AFP
January 24, 2025


Holocaust survivor Esther Senot made it out of Auschwitz alive
 - Copyright AFP/File Wojtek RADWANSKI

Claire GALLEN

On a frosty Polish winter evening, 96-year-old Esther Senot told the 100 or so shivering students at Auschwitz-Birkenau how she was a teenager much like them when she was first brought to the Nazi death camp on September 2, 1943.

Senot said her older sister, so frail and gaunt she was barely recognisable, made her vow to pass on the memory of the camp, a macabre monument to Nazi Germany’s genocide of the Jews.

“She told me, ‘I won’t make it any further. You’re young: promise me that if you make it out, that you’ll tell this story so that we’re not the forgotten ones of history’,” Senot said.

Now nearly 97, Senot returned to the site of her captivity to fulfil her promise to her sister, handing down those memories of one of history’s darkest chapters to the children on a school trip from France.

Between 1940 and 1945 the Nazis killed more than a million people at Auschwitz — most of them Jews, but Poles, Roma and Soviet soldiers too — during Germany’s occupation of Poland.

“We’d been given figures in class but now we realised what people had gone through,” said Charlotte, 16, discussing the trip a week later at her school in Versailles.

“Being born in 2008, I didn’t think I’d have the experience of hearing a survivor,” said her classmate Raphael, also 16.

But with the ranks of survivors dwindling with each passing year, Charlotte and Raphael may be part of one of the last generations with access to these firsthand accounts.

– ‘Witness to witnesses’ –

Auschwitz has become a byword for Nazi Germany’s grim murder of six million European Jews in World War II.

Among its barbed wire-bordered barracks, the gas chambers and the crematorium ovens — not to mention the mounds of hair shaved off those heading to their fates — any suggestion of forgetting the Holocaust seemed fanciful to the teenagers.

“I was struck by the clothes, the suitcases… it brought a physical dimension to what I considered to be facts of history,” said Raphael.

Yet 80 years after the Red Army liberated Auschwitz and its prisoners, and with those still alive now in the twilight of their lives, being forgotten by their generation is precisely what Senot’s fellow survivors say they fear.

Haim Korsia, Chief Rabbi of France, which is home to Europe’s largest Jewish community, has organised trips much like this one for more than two decades.

“That’s the whole point of taking young people to Auschwitz today,” the rabbi said. “They become witness to witnesses.”

But soon the last of those original witnesses will be gone.

Henri Borlant, the only survivor of the 6,000 Jewish children from France deported to Auschwitz in 1942, died in December at the age of 97.

For the children of the 21st century, the Holocaust will “become history, like ancient times”, worried Alexandre Borycki, president of a remembrance organisation based in Loiret, central France.

“We need to think about how we can continue to pass on all this history to younger generations who have a different way of engaging with it.“

– ‘Erasing all trace’ –

Around 76,000 French Jews, including more than 11,000 children, were deported by the Nazis with the help of the collaborationist Vichy government.

Thousands of them, rounded up in Paris in July 1942, were interned at the nearby Pithiviers train station from where they were then deported to Auschwitz. Most never came back.

Hoping to get young people to engage with that tragic history, in 2021 Borycki launched an interactive project to bring it into the classrooms.

There, students play detective to find out as much as possible about those deported to Auschwitz via Pithiviers station given only a first name, surname and date of birth.

Borycki said their research into the archives allowed the association to fill in the gaps in the historical record.

But it also brought home the reality of the Nazi’s so-called “Final Solution”.

In some cases, “they find next to nothing. We tell them: ‘you understand what the Nazis wanted to do, in erasing all trace of these people'”, said Borycki.

– TikTok testimony –

For director Sophie Nahum, the best way to reach young people is by going where the young people are: social media.

Nahum collates testimonies from the last survivors of the Holocaust into short films of up to 10 minutes to be distributed online for her series “Les Derniers” (“The last ones”).

With TikTok particularly popular among teenagers, Nahum has made the video-sharing app a cornerstone of her strategy.

“Young people read little or nothing in the press, and watch very little television. They don’t watch long historical documentaries on the big channels,” she said.

But with “a 10-minute episode or a two-minute extract on TikTok, they’ll go there, look at several in a row and learn something”.

“That’s really where the youngest people are, and that’s where you do the biggest business.”

But she said she had no illusions over the limitations of the platform, accused of funnelling teenagers into echo chambers and failing to curtail illegal, violent or obscene content.

“It’s clearly the most violent network, and it’s very complicated to manage,” she said — all the more so given the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza.

That war, triggered by the Palestinian militant group’s October 7, 2023 attack, sparked a rising tide of anti-Semitism across the world, not least on social media.

Much of that prejudice was already there but October 7 brought “virulent” hatred of Jews out into the open, Nahum said.

“Today, there are no longer any taboos, even with regards to the Holocaust: you can wish a survivor dead without any problem.”

Back in the gloom of Auschwitz, Senot issued one last plea to Charlotte and Raphael’s class before they left.

“If we, at our age, take the time to warn you, it’s in the hope that it never happens again,” she said.





Louvre holds first fashion exhibition, eyeing new audiences


ByAFP
January 24, 2025


A Giambattista Valli dress from the haute couture 2018-2019 collection displayed at 'Louvre Couture' - Copyright AFP ROBERTO SCHMIDT
Sandra BIFFOT-LACUT and Adam PLOWRIGHT

The Louvre in Paris opened its first-ever fashion exhibition on Friday, seeking to draw new, younger audiences to the world’s most popular museum.

The show, called “Louvre Couture”, welcomed its first visitors a day after a stark warning from the director of the famed museum about overcrowding inside the former royal palace.

The exhibition features around a hundred items of clothing by 45 top designers that have been placed alongside objects from the Louvre’s vast collection of decorative artworks, from chests of drawers to armour.

In one instance, a Dolce & Gabbana wool dress printed with a mosaic and embroidered with crystals, stones, and sequins echoes the patterns of an 11th-century Italian mosaic from Torcello, near Venice.

Louvre director Laurence des Cars said the show demonstrated “a subtle and precise dialogue between creations from the 1960s to today and the collections of the decorative arts department, highlighting the deep connection between art and designers”.

“This embodies the core of our broader programming ambition: to continually reinterpret the Louvre’s collections for new generations of visitors with different cultural references,” she added.

The Louvre, which is looking for fresh sources of income, is hoping to emulate the success of fashion exhibitions hosted by New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art and London’s Victoria and Albert in recent years.

A major 2017 retrospective about Christian Dior at the Museum of Decorative Arts, which occupies a wing of the Louvre Palace, led to huge queues and drew a string of A-listers.

– ‘Not good enough’ –

The Louvre was in the headlines in France and internationally on Thursday after the publication of a confidential memo written by des Cars to Culture Minister Rachida Dati warning about the deterioration of conditions inside the museum.

Des Cars said the world-famous art destination suffered from water leaks and extreme temperatures, and was a “physical ordeal” for some visitors because of a lack of relaxation areas among its more than 400 rooms.

“Food options and restroom facilities are insufficient in volume, falling well below international standards,” she wrote.

The museum received 96 million euros ($101 million) in annual public subsidies in 2024, but is hoping for an extra 100 million to cover renovations, a source close the institution told AFP on condition of anonymity.

It welcomed 8.7 million people last year — around twice the number it was designed for.

Asked about conditions inside on Thursday, Dati said she wanted to increase prices for non-European visitors to help increase funding.

“The visiting and working conditions are not good enough for… the biggest museum in the world,” she told reporters. “We need to be innovative, including with financing.”

The Louvre is set to host a fundraising gala during Paris Women’s Fashion Week in March when around 30 tables have been offered for sale, with more than one million euros raised already.

“Louvre Couture” runs until July 21.


The Robing of the Bride, 1940 - Max Ernst - WikiArt.org

REVANCHE IS A FRENCH WORD

France asks EU to delay rights, environment business rules

By AFP
January 24, 2025

The 27-nation EU is scrambling to revamp its economic competitiveness 
- Copyright AFP ROBERTO SCHMIDT

France on Friday asked the European Union to suspend “indefinitely” landmark new rules on environmental and human rights supply chain standards, saying they were too burdensome for businesses.


The call comes as Brussels has vowed to make life easier for firms complaining about excessive regulation, as the 27-nation bloc scrambles to revamp its economic competitiveness.

“Our companies need simplification, not additional administrative burdens,” French European Affairs Minister Benjamin Haddad said on X in announcing the request from Paris.

He also asked for a review of a second set of reporting rules on corporate sustainability that have come under attack from European business lobby groups.

Brussels worries that the EU is failing to keep up with the United States and facing mounting competition from China amid an array of challenges including low productivity, slow growth, high energy costs and weak investments.

EU chief Ursula von der Leyen told this week’s gathering of the world’s elites in Davos that Brussels “must make business much easier all across Europe”.

“Too many firms are holding back investment in Europe because of unnecessary red tape,” she said, adding that the European Commission would launch a “far-reaching simplification” — citing the “due diligence” rules France is now asking be suspended.

Under what is known as the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), large companies are required to identify and address the “adverse human rights and environmental impacts” of their supply chains worldwide.

A group of nine aid and environmental groups including Oxfam France and Bloom denounced Paris’s “irresponsible” call for a delay, which risked “precipitating the unravelling” of legislation necessary to tackle climate and social problems.

“This French position is simply incompatible with the European climate objectives,” the NGOs said.

Approved last March, the CSDDD is one of a series of mammoth laws passed by the bloc in recent years to fight climate change and improve business practices, which are now facing renewed scrutiny.

– ‘Hell for companies’ –

Haddad also called for a review of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), which requires large companies to provide investors and other “stakeholders” with information on their climate impacts and emissions, and the actions being taken to curtail them.

The French government this week described the CSRD rules as “hell for companies”, joining a growing chorus of criticism by executives and others arguing requirements are too onerous.

Large companies must implement the CSRD for the first time in their annual results for 2024.

This week a lobby group for Germany’s big businesses said European companies opposed both sets of EU rules, arguing they “should not be exposed to disproportionate standards” compared to overseas rivals, urging deregulation.

It was echoed by BusinessEurope, the EU’s main business lobby, which on Wednesday said firms urgently needed “a bold signal” that the EU was serious about cutting regulatory burdens.

EVERY THING, EVERY WHERE, ALL AT ONCE

Get ready for 'The Great Revenge' as Trump’s Orwellian America takes shape



Thom Hartmann

January 24, 2025
ALTERNET

By repealing President Lyndon Johnson’s 1965 executive order (EO) banning racial discrimination in hiring for the federal government, Donald Trump has proudly proclaimed his intention of Making America White Again, at least with regard to political power and economic opportunity.

Another EO Trump signed this week proclaims that our sex identity begins at “fertilization” when, in fact, sexual development doesn’t begin to start until at least the sixth week after fertilization. In addition to attacking transgender individuals and setting them up for rank persecution (this EO’s main goal), it’s also a way of laying the groundwork for fetal personhood, a doctrine that will ultimately lead to a total ban on abortion and several methods of birth control.

But the most troubling of his executive orders is the one with the Orwellian name of “Ending the Weaponization of the Federal Government.”

It lays out a rationalization to investigate and then prosecute the investigators and attorneys in the federal government who looked into Trump’s many ties to Russia and Putin. It then goes after those who tracked down and imprisoned January 6th seditionists, and tried (unsuccessfully, thanks to Merrick Garland’s temerity) to prosecute Trump for his attempts to overthrow the 2020 election and to steal top-secret nuclear and espionage secrets (which he allegedly then made available to random foreign spies passing through Mar-a-Lago).

The “Weaponization” EO makes clear from the start that it’s not about ending but, rather, beginning the weaponization of the federal government. It starts right out with a proclamation of Trump’s victimhood:
“The American people have witnessed the previous administration engage in a systematic campaign against its perceived political opponents, weaponizing the legal force of numerous Federal law enforcement agencies and the Intelligence Community against those perceived political opponents in the form of investigations, prosecutions, civil enforcement actions, and other related actions.”

Representing the alleged crimes committed by Trump and his supporters — including fake electors, the January 6th attack on the Capitol, and threats of violence against school boards and others — as mere political differences with Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden, the executive order goes on to assert:

“These actions appear oriented more toward inflicting political pain [on Trump and his supporters] than toward pursuing actual justice or legitimate governmental objectives. Many of these activities appear to be inconsistent with the Constitution and/or the laws of the United States, including those activities directed at parents protesting at school board meetings, Americans who spoke out against the previous administration’s actions, and other Americans who were simply exercising constitutionally protected rights.”

Trump’s lawyers who drafted the EO fail to mention that the Department of Justice investigated intimidation of school board members at the written request of the National School Boards Association (NSBA), hardly a hotbed of leftwing political activity. Or that the people who attacked the Capitol weren’t merely “exercising their constitutionally protected rights” when they killed three police officers and sent 170 others to the hospital.

Proving that “every Trump accusation is an admission,” the EO goes on to claim that the Biden administration had turned America into a third-world nation by using the police power of the state to influence or control politics and elections:

“The prior administration and allies throughout the country engaged in an unprecedented, third-world weaponization of prosecutorial power to upend the democratic process. It targeted individuals who voiced opposition to the prior administration’s policies with numerous Federal investigations and politically motivated funding revocations, which cost Americans access to needed services.”

Without specifics, it’s impossible to tell exactly what the author is speaking of around “targeting individuals”; in all probability the real goal of this paragraph is to justify Trump’s Justice Department and FBI doing exactly what’s outlined here going forward: investigate and prosecute those “who voice opposition” to Trump as he works to gut Social Security and Medicare and tries to harass or imprison his political opponents. (He just reversed Biden’s reduction of drug prices for Medicare and Medicaid recipients, for example.)

And then the EO wanders into the realm of flat-out lies and misrepresentations:
“The Department of Justice even jailed an individual for posting a political meme. And while the Department of Justice has ruthlessly prosecuted more than 1,500 individuals associated with January 6 and simultaneously dropped nearly all cases against BLM rioters.”

The guy who “posted a political meme” was named Douglass Mackey, a white man who was sentenced to seven months in prison in October 2023 for posting a picture of a Black woman in front of an “African Americans for Hillary” sign with text instructing people to “Avoid the line, vote from home and text Hillary to 59925.”

It’s also worth noting that Mackey committed this election interference crime during the 2016 election and most of the investigation and prosecution of him was done by the Trump Justice Departmentstarting in 2018.

And the EO’s claim that Biden’s DOJ “dropped nearly all cases against BLM rioters” isn’t just wrong, it’s a flat-out lie. Not only did the Biden administration continue prosecutions begun during Trump’s last year in office, they brought over a hundred new cases putting more than 70 BLM-protest-associated defendants in prison for an average of 27 months with at least ten people getting five years or more.

Asking Trump and his people to simply tell the truth appears to be a bridge too far; George Orwell himself couldn’t have done better if he’d tried to draft this EO in the voice of Big Brother.


We’ve already seen Trump try this weaponization of the Justice Department, in a small way, with the appointment during his first term of John Durham, the federal prosecutor who set out to prove that the charges of Trump’s ties to Russia and Putin were false and politically motivated.

Merrick Garland made that wrong and rather pathetic decision to keep Durham on (just like he did with the political prosecution of Hunter Biden). Nonetheless, Durham ended up endorsing the Mueller Report’s conclusions that Russia was working hard to elect Trump, and his bumbling attempts to prosecute people for investigating Trump ended in easy acquittals by two different juries.

But now Trump runs the Justice Department, and, in all probability, former Florida AG Pam Bondi will be Trump’s attorney general. Which should deeply trouble all Americans who care about keeping politics and the police and prosecutorial apparatus of our nation separate, given that:

— Bondi refused to directly answer whether or not she would investigate Jack Smith, the special counsel who brought criminal cases against Trump. When asked, she said it would be “irresponsible” to make any commitment without reviewing files.
— When questioned about investigating former Rep. Liz Cheney for serving on the January 6 committee, Bondi avoided a direct answer, stating, “You’re trying to engage me in a gotcha. I won’t do it.”
— She declined to rule out investigating Trump’s political opponents, instead claiming, “No one will be prosecuted, investigated because they are a political opponent.”
— Bondi refused to condemn Trump’s characterization of January 6 defendants as “hostages” or “patriots,” claiming — incredibly — that she was “unfamiliar” with his ever having said such a thing.


The real goal of this executive order is to kick off the prosecution of people Trump considers his political enemies.

Under normal circumstances, the Department of Justice can’t open an investigation (or subsequent prosecution) of an American citizen without at least “a reasonable indication of criminal activity” (the lowest standard, not requiring proof), “reasonable suspicion” (based on evidence), or a “criminal predicate” (based on past investigations or convictions).

But these aren’t normal circumstances; Trump is hell-bent-for-leather to turn America into a tinpot dictatorship as fast as he can, establishing the same sort of single-party state his mentors, Vladimir Putin and Viktor Orbán, run in Russia and Hungary.

Thus this EO, which establishes a legal basis for the DOJ to start investigations and prosecutions ASAP without the usually-required evidence or “indication of criminal activity.”

Get ready for investigations, arrests, and show trials of the people who’ve tried to hold Trump accountable for his crimes and traitorous behavior. By signing this executive order, he’s all but announced them with fireworks and loudspeakers.

‘Civil Rights Canon in American Law’: Trump Rescinds Historic LBJ Non-discrimination Order



January 22, 2025 
By David Badash
THE NEW CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT


With a stroke of a pen, President Donald Trump signed a sweeping executive order on Tuesday that overturned government policies going back six decades that banned discrimination and required affirmative action by federal contractors.
This order canceled directives established by previous orders, including those issued by Presidents Lyndon B. Johnson and Barack Obama. The move, executed late Tuesday, came just a day after President Trump rescinded executive orders requiring diversity and affirmative action in the federal workplace.

In 1965, President Lyndon Baines Johnson signed Executive Order 11246, banning federal contractors “from discriminating in employment decisions on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin,” according to the U.S. Department of Labor, which was charged with ensuring its compliance. Until President Trump rescinded it on Tuesday, EO11246 also required “contractors to take affirmative action to ensure that equal opportunity is provided in all aspects of their employment.”

President Barack Obama in 2014 amended that order via Executive Order 13672, which added “sexual orientation or gender identity” to the list of protected classes.


In his Tuesday executive order, “Trump said the OFCCP [Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs] must immediately stop promoting diversity and affirmative action, and cease ‘allowing or encouraging’ contractors and subcontractors to engage in ‘workforce balancing’ based on race, sex, color, religion, national origin, and ‘sexual preference,'” according to Bloomberg Law.


“Trump has jumped into action in weakening diversity, equity, and inclusion policies since his inauguration. He already signed a pair of executive orders on Jan. 20 that eliminated DEI programs within the federal government and restricted the definition of ‘gender’ to male and female,” Bloomberg reported. “Trump’s sweeping new order Tuesday also aimed to ‘encourage’ private-sector companies to end ‘illegal’ DEI programs by redefining them as a form of discrimination.”

Axios reported, “This takes the current pushback on diversity, equity and inclusion into the next stratosphere — abolishing decades of government standards on diversity and equal opportunity, and seeking to crackdown on the same in the private sector.”

Trump on Tuesday also effectively furloughed all employees throughout the federal government, placing them on leave with pay. It is expected that he will terminate their employment.




“The memo, issued Tuesday to heads of departments and agencies, sets a deadline of no later than 5 p.m. ET Wednesday to inform the employees that they will be put on paid administrative leave as the agencies prepare to close all DEI-related offices and programs and to remove all websites and social media accounts for such offices,” NBC News reported. “It also asks federal agencies to submit a written plan by Jan. 31 for dismissing the employees.”

“Trump signed an executive order Monday ending ‘radical and wasteful’ diversity, equity and inclusion programs in federal agencies, with DEI offices and programs being ordered to shut down.”

Trump has a history of battling government anti-discrimination regulations. His real estate business was sued in the 1970s by the U.S. Department of Justice in a racial discrimination case.

“Trump and his father fiercely fought a 1973 discrimination lawsuit brought by the Justice Department for their alleged refusal to rent apartments in predominantly white buildings to black tenants,” the Associated Press reported in a 2016 fact check. “Testimony showed that the applications filed by black apartment seekers were marked with a ‘C’ for ‘colored.’ A settlement that ended the lawsuit did not require the Trumps to explicitly acknowledge that discrimination had occurred — but the government’s description of the settlement said Trump and his father had ‘failed and neglected’ to comply with the Fair Housing Act.”

Constitutional law professor and political scientist Anthony Michael Kreis on Wednesday called LBJ’s EO11246 “a fundamental piece of the civil rights canon in American law.”

“The symbolism” in Trump revoking the order, “is huge,” he added.



“The phrase ‘affirmative action’ was used by JFK in a 1961 order on equal employment. Johnson followed it with this order, which survived six Republican presidents — including Trump’s first term,” noted ABC News Radio’s Steven Portnoy. “He revoked it last night.”

“The rollback of civil rights intensifies. For almost six decades, Executive Order 11246 (signed by LBJ in 1965) forbade federal contractors and vendors to discriminate by race, color, national origin, religion, sex, etc. This morning, the president revoked it,” commented Tom Sugrue, a Professor of Social and Cultural Analysis and History.

Laurence Tribe, the noted constitutional law scholar and retired Harvard Law professor, observed: “There goes six decades of progress toward justice begun by LBJ.”

Nicholas Sarwark, former Chair of the Libertarian National Committee, noted: “One of the goals of MAGA is to repeal the civil rights era, making segregation, discrimination, and voter suppression legal and deny people their rights under the Constitution and the laws of the United States. Will that make life better for you, your family, or your neighbors?”

At The New Republic, Malcolm Ferguson wrote: “This is a massive, regressive attack on basic policy that helps protect people from real discrimination. And it won’t lower the price of eggs.”


Wartime president': Conservative details ways Trump is 'at war with half of America'

January 22, 2025
ALTERNET


Although Donald Trump has only been back in the White House a few days, his second presidency has already generated a great deal of controversy — from pardoning more than 1500 January 6 rioters to issuing an executive order calling for an end to birthright citizenship (which, the ACLU says, he doesn't have the authority to do because birthright citizenship is protected in the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment).

In a column for The Bulwark, Never Trump conservative Jonathan V. Last lays out some reasons he considers Trump a "wartime president." But the president's primary target, Last stresses, isn't a foreign adversary.

"He can finally be a wartime president," Last argues. "It's just that he's going to war against America."

Trump, Last laments, "sees himself as being at war with half of America" — and he is expressing his "wartime" outlook by pardoning the January 6 rioters, fighting against birthright citizenship and proposing steep tariffs on U.S. trading partners.

"If he targets immigrants in blue states," Last warns, "he can create a drag on local, blue-state economies while satisfying the anti-immigrant desires of red-state voters. It's a twofer. Trump can hurt businesses and make life more expensive for consumers in New York and Illinois — and then attack blue state mayors and governors for these problems and maybe even help Republican candidates win in those states. Meanwhile, Fox will run B-roll from the raids on a loop, satisfying Trump voters in Texas and Arizona — whose economies will continue to benefit from immigrant workers."

The Never Trumper continues, "Trump understands that blue states are the last bastions of meaningful popular opposition to his rule, so he will use the federal government to subdue them. That's what deportations — and tariffs — are for. These are executive powers which can be used in highly-targeted ways to hurt on local economies. If you live in a blue state, President Trump is going to use the power of the federal government to make your life harder."

Trump, according to Last, "is governing not for all Americans…. but as an attack on the half of America that opposed him."

"I hope we can all be clear-eyed about this," Last writes. "Because being clear-eyed is about all we can do for the moment."

Jonathan V. Last's full column for The Bulwark is available at this link.



Alarm Bells Sound as Trump Gets to Work on 'Extreme Authoritarian Agenda'

"Trump isn't king, but if Congress capitulates, he could be," warned the leaders of Popular Democracy.


A poster with an image of the face of the Statue of Liberty, with her hands covering her face, is displayed at a January 18, 2025 rally held in Paris, France just days before U.S. President Donald Trump's inauguration.

(Photo: Owen Franken - Corbis/Getty Images


Jessica Corbett
Jan 21, 2025
COMMON DREAMS


Since U.S. President Trump's return to office on Monday—at an inauguration ceremony full of American oligarchs—as the Republican has issued a flurry of executive orders and other actions, progressive leaders and organizers have expressed alarm and vowed to fight against his "authoritarian" agenda.

On his first day back at the White House, Trump issued 26 executive orders, 12 memos, and four proclamations, plus withdrew 78 of former President Joe Biden's executive actions, according to a tally from The Hill. Those moves related to the fossil fuel-driven climate emergency, the death penaltyfederal workersimmigrationLGBTQ+ rightsprescription drug prices, and more.

"In the last 24 hours, Trump has passed dozens of executive orders—many beyond his powers," said Popular Democracy co-director Analilia Mejia and DaMareo Cooper in a Tuesday statement. "Yet, not one of them has lowered prices or made life better for Americans. Instead, he's focused on eroding democracy, attacking constitutional rights, and spreading fear, cruelty, and chaos.

"Trump has taken aim at the 14th Amendment's rights of equal protection and citizenship—the fundamental American right to live and participate in our democracy—with an executive order targeting birthright citizenship," they noted, referencing a policy that is already facing legal challenges from immigrant rights groups and state attorneys general.


Announcing one of the lawsuits, ACLU executive director Anthony Romero said that "this order seeks to repeat one of the gravest errors in American history, by creating a permanent subclass of people born in the U.S. who are denied full rights as Americans. We will not let this attack on newborns and future generations of Americans go unchallenged. The Trump administration's overreach is so egregious that we are confident we will ultimately prevail."

Mejia and Cooper said that "his ineffective and inhumane executive orders targeting immigrants misuse military power and double down on damaging our communities."

The group America's Voice similarly expressed concern over Trump's "authoritarian notions of deploying the military on U.S. streets," with the group's executive director, Vanessa Cárdenas, saying that "this is an attack on American families and our American values. Trump's framing of our nation being 'invaded' coupled with the attacks on birthright citizenship and policies that will throw our immigration system further into chaos show that this is a hateful campaign to justify a nativist agenda that seeks to redefine 'American' and move this nation backwards."



Popular Democracy's leaders also called out various other items from Trump's first day that are expected to face legal hurdles—though the Republican spent his first term working with GOP lawmakers to pack the federal judiciary, including the U.S. Supreme Court, with far-right appointees, so the effectiveness of such suits remains to be seen.

"Trump's rollbacks of critical climate policy sell out future generations to the profit of oil and gas polluters, and further endangers the poor, Black, brown, and Indigenous people who have been at the frontlines of climate disaster," they said. Trump not only repealed various Biden-era policies but also declared a "national energy emergency" to "drill, baby, drill" for fossil fuels.

Climate campaigners slammed Trump for invoking "authoritarian powers on Day 1 to gut environmental protections," in the words of the Center for Biological Diversity. The organization's executive director, Kierán Suckling, vowed that "no matter how extreme he becomes, we'll confront Trump with optimism and a fierce defense of our beloved wildlife and the planet's health."

"The United States has some of the strongest environmental laws in the world, and no matter how petulantly Trump behaves, these laws don't bend before the whims of a wannabe dictator," Suckling stressed. "The use of emergency powers doesn't allow a president to bypass our environmental safeguards just to enrich himself and his cronies."



The president's attacks on health are expansive. As Mejia and Cooper detailed: "Trump's sweeping changes to healthcare will rip away access for millions, line the pockets of Big Pharma, and undo strides in reproductive rights. They also single out trans Americans, denying them lifesaving healthcare and the right to live freely and authentically."

Imara Jones, a Black trans woman, CEO of TransLash Media, and an expert on the anti-trans political movement, said in a Tuesday statement that "Trump's recognition of only 'two genders' means a war on trans people, as well as any cis person with a gender expression outside of the gender binary."

"This is not political theater, this is the beginning of a potential authoritarian takeover of the United States, one that starts with targeting one of the smallest and most vulnerable groups: transgender people," Jones emphasized. "They seek to erase trans people from public life and want to see if they can get away with it, as a prelude to much more. This should worry all of us."

Another development that provoked intense worry—and even led the Lemkin Institute for Genocide Studies and Prevention to issue a "red flag alert for genocide in the United States"—was Elon Musk, the richest person on Earth and a key Trump ally, twice raising his arm in what was widely seen as a Nazi salute during a post-inauguration celebration.




Trump's Monday night decision to pardon over 1,500 people who stormed the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, an insurrection incited by the president himself as he contested his 2020 electoral loss, elicited similar warnings.

"By granting clemency to these individuals, who sought to overturn the peaceful transfer of power, Trump is signaling that political violence and the rejection of democratic norms are acceptable tactics in service to his authoritarian agenda," said Our Revolution executive director Joseph Geevarghese. "This is a direct threat to the foundations of our democracy and the safety of our communities."

The leaders of Popular Democracy highlighted that "undergirding this extreme authoritarian agenda is a claim that Trump has a mandate to act like a despot—no such mandate exists, much less is acceptable to the American people."

"Trump isn't king, but if Congress capitulates, he could be," they warned, just weeks after Republicans took slim control of both chambers. "Popular Democracy is prepared to push back against Trump's assault on our communities. We will stand up against an unconstitutional power grab, and hold our representatives accountable in this fight."




Op-Ed: Trump. Ukraine, Mexican border, and superficiality

By Paul Wallis
January 22, 2025
DIGITAL JOURNAL


Arizona Mexico Border. — © Frederic J. Brown, AFP

From the frantic headlines about Ukraine and the Mexican border emergency, you’d think something was being done, and that anything was happening.

Trump has “told” Putin to end the “ridiculous” Ukraine war or face sanctions and tariffs.

Trump has ordered troops to the Mexican border and supposedly intends to seal the border.

Dramatic, yes.

Attention-getting, yes.

Meaningful?

Not particularly.

Russia is already the most sanctioned place on earth. You can’t charge tariffs on illegal trade with a country under sanctions. The noise is all about Trump being visible on the issues. He’s also being seen as giving orders to Putin, a departure from the last time they met. Putin may not like that.

Anything could happen in Russia. Economic and social stability are questionable at best. That could mean very hard times in a place that is looking almost back to the horrific 1990s in some ways. Discontent is real enough.

The Ukraine situation requires a lot more than a press release. A satisfactory peace needs more than rhetoric from thousands of miles away. Donetsk alone may be uninhabitable after all the fighting. The entire area is full of unexploded munitions and toxic chemistry. The dead and maimed aren’t doing too well, either. The displaced people need help. Cleaning up to any degree will take years, a lot of skills, and lots of money.
It was not immediately clear how much Ukraine had advanced in Kursk
 – Copyright AFP Yan DOBRONOSOV

The world could at least try using a brain cell to analyze the problems. Where’s the reconstruction aid? What about repatriation? What about the tens of thousands who may need lifelong care?

OK, you have to start somewhere, but why is nobody talking about the inevitable next steps? Why is everyone just sitting around amid the disasters?

How America relates to the world, and how the world relates to America, are the two critical issues for the immediate future. Credibility matters more than verbosity.

Superficiality won’t work. America’s idiotic war with itself has never worked. Putting lipstick on the wrong end of the pig won’t help.

Meanwhile – The Mexican border is mainly used by illegal immigrants getting the cheapskate no-frills service from people smugglers. The border is not generally the successful way of getting into the US. Everyone knows that, particularly the criminals exploiting desperate people at very much higher prices.

President Donald Trump’s crackdown on illegal migration devastated some migrants at the US-Mexico border
 – Copyright AFP Guillermo Arias

There are plenty of other ways to get into the US that don’t involve floundering around in a hostile desert. This response is yet another cosmetic exercise which is basically an expensive marketing stunt.

The Mexican government is stuck with its own serious domestic issues and a border situation in which the US government doesn’t seem to be working with it at all. Back in 2007, millions of guns went from the US to Mexico. Nobody paid any attention. The cartels emerged soon after. That worked out well, didn’t it?

US policy on Mexico hasn’t changed much since Teddy Roosevelt but this ain’t San Juan Hill anymore. A Mexican version of Vietnam doesn’t sound too appealing, either. Mexico should not be pushed into any sort of confrontational situation.

Try pushing the right buttons. It might help.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed in this Op-Ed are those of the author. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the Digital Journal or its members.























Scientist warns Trump’s 'muzzling of science' will have 'huge chilling effect' on research


Epidemiologist Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding on MSNBC's Deadline White House on January 24, 2025 (Image: Screengrab via MSNBC / YouTube)
January 24, 2025
ALTERNET

One scientist who studies disease outbreaks is warning that President Donald Trump's campaign of retribution against his political enemies is stifling important research.

In a Friday interview with MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace, Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding blasted Trump's recent decision to halt communications, travel and hiring for the National Institutes of Health, which oversees more than $47 billion dedicated to funding scientific research and experiments across the country. Science magazine reported this week that the announcement from the Trump White House was causing "uncertainty, fear and panic" among the scientific community.

Dr. Feigl-Ding said the explanation that the announcement was just a "temporary pause" until February doesn't change the fact that the abrupt cancellation of grant review panels, hiring and trips to present new research will be debilitating to important ongoing projects. He lamented that that this week marked the first time in decades that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention didn't publish its weekly Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR).

READ MORE: Which infectious disease is likely to be the biggest emerging problem in 2025?

"These in-person meetings actually will be probably rescheduled two, three, four months from now. And the impact of that research is we're talking about medical research, clinical trials that cannot pause, but they are scattered around the U.S., around the world trying to find cures for all these diseases," Dr. Feigl-Ding said. "So the impact on universities will be humongous."

"Entire university budgets might be frozen for quite an extra-long period of time," he continued. "It's devastating because now it also, even if they restart it, there will be this, you know, eerie silence, this unspoken, 'you better not publish anything that we don't want you to publish,' which again, during the pandemic, we know the Trump administration muzzled MMWR scientific reports on the pandemic. Anything that he doesn't like. So they will have a huge chilling effect."

Currently, the United States is in the midst of an avian flu outbreak, which has resulted in poultry farms having to cull entire flocks of chickens who have the virus. This has caused the price of eggs to skyrocket to an all-time high, despite Trump's promises that he would lower the prices of grocery staples like eggs under his administration. Dr. Feigl-Ding called on his fellow scientists to take a stand against the politicization of their research and embrace being "public advocates" for their work.

"The scientific community can't stand back while misinformation, disinformation and the muzzling of science is ongoing," he said. "I think this second Trump administration is truly the time when scientists will hopefully stand up and realize that they can't just rely on doing the science."

Watch the video of Dr. Feigl-Ding's full segment below, or by clicking this link.


Trump Orders Federal Health Agencies to Suspend Advisories, Scientific Reports

"Officials in sane and scientific states must band together to report data on their own," said one journalist.



Two people wear face masks in New York City on December 30, 2024, as public health officials warned that respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) cases had jumped in the city and advised people to wear masks in crowded indoor places.
(Photo: Selcuk Acar/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Julia Conley
Jan 22, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

"The censorship begins," said one public health expert as the Trump administration directed federal health agencies to suspend all external communications, like those that have updated people across the U.S. in recent weeks amid outbreaks of Covid-19, influenza, and norovirus.

The Washington Postreported Tuesday evening that administration officials delivered the directive to staff members at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

The agencies operate under the Health and Human Services Department (HHS), which President Donald Trump has nominated vaccine conspiracy theorist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to lead. Kennedy has signaled that if confirmed he would purge the ranks of the FDA and change federal vaccine guidelines, including potentially limiting or eliminating the CDC's program that provides free immunizations to uninsured and underinsured children.

The pause on external communications will be in place for an indeterminate amount of time, according to the Post, and applies to the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) compiled by the CDC. The epidemiological record includes "timely, reliable, authoritative, accurate, objective, and useful public health information and recommendations" for healthcare professionals and the public.

During the last year of Trump's first term, as the coronavirus pandemic spread across the country, HHS officials denounced the MMWR as "hit pieces on the administration" and pushed to delay and prevent the CDC from releasing new information about the pandemic that didn't align with the White House's views.


While changes to the operations and communications of federal health agencies after a new administration enters the White House are "not unprecedented," said epidemiologist Ali Khan, the MMWR "should never go dark."

The health agencies were instructed to halt communications about public health as the news media reported on a so-called "quad-demic" of four viruses that have been circulating for several weeks across the country.

CDC data shows that the spread of influenza A, Covid-19, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is "high" or "very high," and norovirus cases have been rising in recent weeks.

The country is also facing an "ongoing multi-state outbreak" of the H5N1 avian flu among dairy cattle, with 67 total human cases also reported during the current outbreak.

The CDC had been scheduled to publish three MMWR updates this week on H5N1 when the new directive was announced.

The Post reported that it was unclear whether the ban on external communications would apply to reports of new avian flu cases or foodborne illness outbreaks.

Journalist Jeff Jarvis said Trump's new policy will give way to "forced ignorance on health data" and called on officials "in sane and scientific states" to continue reporting public health information on their own.





The suspension of external communications will apply to website updates and social media posts, advisories that the CDC sends to clinicians about public health incidents, and data releases from the National Center for Health Statistics, according to the Post.

"Asking health agencies to pause all external communications is NOT typical protocol for administration changes," said Lucky Tran, director of science communication at Columbia University. "Generally website updates, disease case counts, and other typical day-to-day work continues."

Tran noted that during his first term, Trump officials halted external communications for the Environmental Protection Agency and the Interior Department.


"In their second term," he said, "they appear to be targeting health agencies too."

America’s love affair with confident stupidity has reached awful new heights


REUTERS/Mike Blake
Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a rally, in Henderson, Nevada, U.S. October 31, 2024.
January 24, 2025

Five years ago, I wrote about how the politics of stupidity and crankery in America was degrading us as a society and human beings.

That was January 2020.

Within months, the COVID-19 pandemic hit the U.S. It’s only gotten so much worse.

For the remainder of 2020, we dealt with 385,676 deaths from the disease while then-President Trump lived in denial and misled the American people every day. He lied about its danger, how long it would last, treatments and prevention. He would bring in medical experts to speak during White House press conferences and then make stuff up himself out of nowhere and undermine everything that they said.

It was horrifying. People were dying and losing loved ones and the president was spewing an endless stream of strange nonsense, drivel, and dangerous misinformation. Many millions of people believed everything he said without question.

Then Trump lost the 2020 Election. He began lying about that too. Millions believed him again. Coward politicians rolled over for him. His lies exploded in the historic Jan. 6 attack on our nation’s Capitol.

As the COVID-19 vaccine was rolled out to the public at-large in 2021, the anti-vaxxer movement went into overdrive. Currently vaccine hesitancy is near record highs, so the anti-vaxxer movement really made out, a grisly and telling cultural consequence of a pandemic that’s taken 1.2 million American lives.

Regardless, objectively, the covid vaccine was a man-made miracle. Plagues throughout history have lasted up to 20 years or more. We had a vaccine in 11 months thanks to the brilliance of scientific research and modern medicine. It was incredible. It was a tremendous accomplishment of humankind by every historical standard, and people threw the most outrageous temper tantrums over it.

It’s easy to get lost in modern comfort, but I wish more people would just take a few seconds sometimes to recognize that we live in extraordinary times. The fact that we get to take hot showers every day is a monumental luxury compared to the rest of human history.

That we can communicate across the globe instantaneously is anthropologically astounding, if you compare the last 30 years of human history to the 300,000 years before it.

Look around you right now, wherever you are: desks, tables, electronics, electricity, light bulbs, appliances, glassware, furniture, knick-knacks, artwork, paint, carpeting, buildings. All of those things require science, engineering, mathematics, chemistry, physics, logistics, expertise. Experts. Smart people. Smart people gave us all of this.


Intelligence gave us every amazing thing that we see around us and take for granted. The collective education of humankind over millennia has brought us here.

A whole galaxy of humans and human know-how has come together to give us these wild luxuries of daily existence that make the vast majority of us wealthier in health and technology and everyday human comfort than the richest kings and queens and emperors of history.

And yet. We sneer at experts. We spit epithets like “academic elites” at professors dedicating their lives to pursuing discovery that benefits humankind. And we worship flashy internet hucksters selling lifestyle scams.

We mock intelligence and glorify egomania and materialism. We worship spectacle and are voyeurs for anger, confrontation, and violence.


We live in fantasy worlds where what we want to believe is true regardless of whether it is true, because what we want comes first no matter what, certainly no matter any facts, this decadence of mind and body only afforded to us by modernity’s remarkable luxury and technology.

It is in these ways that I regard a very great many adults as simply overgrown children.

Speaking of which, five years later, Donald Trump is president again. He has pardoned the 1,500 rioters who sacked the United States Congress to try to overthrow the last election for him.

Trump also launched a broadside this week against America’s scientific, academic, and medical research efforts, pulling the U.S. out of the World Health Organization and hitting the National Institutes for Health with with “devastating” freezes on meetings, travel, communications.

Trump’s cancellation of NIH grant review panels, as Forbes reports, includes the $7.1 billion annual budget for the National Cancer Institute: “of which more than $3 billion a year is allocated directly towards research for the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of cancer, which causes over 600,000 deaths in the U.S. every year.” The NCI supports 72 different cancer centers.

Freezing national funding for cancer research is sadistic.

It could also be devastating to America’s institutions of higher education.

In Ohio, Republican politicians are piling on. This week they reintroduced a proposal to overhaul education at our colleges and universities.

They seek to install a culture of fear and paranoia over subject matter among Ohio faculty, threatening their livelihoods and banning their ability to strike. They also seek to ban any diversity efforts on campuses as well as any diversity courses.

The bill’s clear intent is to having a chilling effect on freedom of speech and expression in Ohio’s institutions of higher learning, both explicit and implicit, which is an atrocious insult to the entire purpose of education and all of the ideas behind open inquiry in the pursuit of knowledge.

Ohio higher education currently ranks No. 39 in America. Apparently that’s not bad enough for them.

America’s love affair with confident stupidity continues to reach awful new heights. The bill will come due. The piper will need paid. The damage will be extensive.

Ohio Capital Journal is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Ohio Capital Journal maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor David Dewitt for questions: info@ohiocapitaljournal.com.