Friday, January 31, 2025

 

With $2 million in new funding, Montana State research lab continues explorations into viruses and honeybee health




Montana State University




BOZEMAN – With the help of two major grants from the National Science Foundation and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, a team in Montana State University’s College of Agriculture is furthering investigations of honeybee antiviral defense mechanisms with the goal of developing strategies to reduce honeybee colony deaths.

According to Michelle Flenniken, a professor in MSU’s Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology and co-director of the university’s Pollinator Health Center, annual honeybee colony losses have averaged roughly 38% in the U.S. in the past 15 years. Despite these losses, beekeepers in the U.S. have maintained the number of bee colonies at roughly 2.5 million by dividing one colony to make two – a process called “splitting.” 

While splitting helps to offset some of the impact of colony losses, Flenniken said the core problem of population decline is concerning. Many factors, including mite infestation, chemical exposure and pathogens – including viruses – contribute to those losses. In Montana, Flenniken said, beekeepers maintain over 250,000 honeybee colonies for honey production and crop pollination, both in and out of the state. Therefore, pollinator health is a crucial area of research for Montana and beyond.

Many of the viruses that affect honeybees cause observable symptoms for which they are named, such as deformed wing virus. However, scientists have learned that many virus-infected bees don’t exhibit symptoms, even when they harbor high viral loads. The impact of these asymptomatic infections on honeybee health is not clear, Flenniken said, and since viruses use the cellular and energetic resources of their host to replicate, she hypothesized that these overlooked infections may be more detrimental to honeybee health than is currently appreciated.

Supported by a $1.4 million grant from the NSF, Flenniken’s team of graduate and undergraduate student researchers is working to better understand the impact of virus infections on honeybee health. One study, by MSU doctoral student Naomi Kaku, is using flight performance as an indicator of overall bee health. Kaku uses flight mills, machines to which an individual bee is attached by a leash, measuring its flight distance and speed. The mills were made by associate professor Mark Jankauski in MSU’s Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. Kaku’s research compares the flight distance, duration and speed of healthy bees to virus-infected bees.  

So far, Kaku has found that bees infected with some viruses don’t fly as far or as fast as healthy bees. The reduced flight distance in infected bees may reduce the ability of forager bees to obtain nectar and pollen to feed their colony, extending the impacts of infection to a community of roughly 30,000 bees. In addition, Kaku and Flenniken are examining the role of the honeybee heat shock stress response in combatting viral infection.

“Flight generates heat, and we know that for at least some viruses, that heat shock response can reduce infections,” said Kaku, who is in her fifth year of doctoral studies in Flenniken’s lab. 

In addition to investigating that hypothesis, Flenniken’s team is researching the potential of two supplements to boost honeybee immune strength, a project supported by a $680,000 grant from the USDA’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. 

Previous research in the Flenniken lab, as well as data from other labs, indicated that the honeybee immune system is activated by double-stranded RNA, which is produced by replicating viruses. Therefore, Flenniken’s team is experimenting with the use of synthetic dsRNA to stimulate the immune response, which in turn is expected to reduce virus infection levels.

Similarly, thyme oil and thymol, which are naturally produced by thyme plants, have been shown to activate honeybee immune responses. Therefore, members of the Flenniken lab, including doctoral student Hunter Charles in MSU’s Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, are carrying out studies to determine the potential virus reducing efficacy of these compounds.

“Research in our lab is aimed at understanding how bees have evolved to fend off viruses on their own,” Flenniken said. “By better understanding that process, we hope that will lead to strategies that we could use to promote bee health.” 

These strategies may include the development of feeding supplements, but for now Flenniken encourages bee enthusiasts to plant for pollinators; a list of pollinator-supporting plants can be found on MSU’s Pollinator Health Center’s resource page. In addition, she encourages members of the community to join her team at volunteer events held every summer at MSU’s Pollinator Garden, which is the home of MSU’s own honeybee colonies.

“We love having groups come, learn about bees and volunteer in the garden,” Flenniken said.

Opportunities to volunteer will be posted to the MSU Calendar. The team also welcomes donations that support undergraduate and graduate students working on honeybee research.


 

Scientists chip away at potato storage problems




Cranfield University




They’re one of the UK’s most loved staples, providing around half of our carbohydrate intake as a nation and supporting over 20,000 farm, transport and manufacturing jobs. Now, new research is focusing on ensuring reliable supplies of the potato all year round with a project that focuses on potato dormancy and extending storage life.

To achieve year-round supplies in the UK, around 1.5 million tonnes of potatoes are kept in cold stores for up to eight months to prevent sprouting. However, following the withdrawal of a chemical that suppresses sprouting, CIPC, vegetable losses have increased and the storage duration time for potatoes can be halved to four months.

Now researchers from Cranfield University, working with PepsiCo and Solynta, a leader in hybrid potato breeding, are using advanced genetic analysis to tackle the challenges of maintaining crop quality whilst extending storage life. The project aims to solve the problem of keeping potatoes dormant for longer, using fewer chemicals, less energy and generating less food waste.

With a grant from Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) prosperity partnership fund , the project to enhance potato dormancy brings together expertise in genetics, plant biology, and technology.

The team aims to develop new potato varieties and storage methods that:

  • Extend storage life: reducing food waste and ensuring year-round supply.
  • Lower energy consumption: minimising the environmental impact of cold storage.
  • Reduce chemical use: promoting sustainable agriculture practices.

Findings from the study could help inform storage methods around the world with adaptations according to regional variations in harvest periods and facilities.

“By reducing chemical use and improving energy efficiency in storage, we’re safeguarding the future of potato farming making it safer for the end consumer” said Mari Carmen Alamar Gavidia, Senior Lecturer in Postharvest Biology from Cranfield University.

“This approach will not only cut waste but also supports the environment. It will ensure a year-round supply of safer and higher quality potatoes for consumers and make sure the nation can enjoy crisps, chips and mash uninterrupted.”

Professor Leon Terry, Pro-Vice-Chancellor of Research and Innovation at Cranfield University, said: “Mitigating food waste is a key piece of the puzzle to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This grant is testament to the longstanding applied research Cranfield has provided to the GB potato industry over many years.”

 

People’s acceptance of AI judgements on moral decisions: A study on justified defection




Rissho University




A research team led by Dr Prof. Hitoshi Yamamoto of Rissho University and Dr Prof. Takahisa Suzuki of Tsuda University explored the conditions under which people would accept the moral judgments of AI. They focused on the behaviour of "not helping people with bad reputations (justified non-cooperation)," which is difficult for people to judge as good or bad, to investigate under what conditions people are more likely to accept AI's judgments over human judgments. The study revealed that people tend to be more accepting of AI's judgments when AI makes positive judgments and humans make negative judgments. The research results were published in the online academic journal Scientific Reports of the Nature Publishing Group on 27th January 2025.

As AI technology becomes more integrated into daily life, understanding public acceptance of AI's decisions is critical. Previous studies have shown that people often hold biases, such as "algorithm aversion" and "algorithm appreciation," where they might distrust or over-trust AI. However, this study addresses the less-explored scenario where individuals find themselves uncertain in their moral judgment, specifically in indirect reciprocity, where individuals decide whether to cooperate with others based on reputation.

The researchers conducted two experiments with Japanese participants, examining how they judged an AI manager's decision compared to a human manager's in a workplace scenario. The key findings showed that participants were more inclined to accept the AI's decision when AI judged a non-cooperative action as positive (justified defection) and a human judged it as negative. The results suggest that individuals may perceive AI's judgment as more objective, especially when human judgments might be perceived as biased or driven by hidden intentions.

The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms behind people’s acceptance of AI in moral and social decision-making, highlighting the importance of context in shaping these perceptions. As society continues integrating AI into complex decision-making roles, such insights are essential for designing AI systems that align with human expectations and societal norms.

Read more:
Exploring condition in which people accept AI over human judgements on justified defection.
Yamamoto, H., Suzuki, T.
Scientific Reports  volume 15, Article number: 3339 (2025).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87170-w

 

From bowling balls to hip joints: Chemists create recyclable alternative to durable plastics




Cornell University




ITHACA, N.Y. – Cornell University researchers have developed a recyclable alternative to a durable class of plastics used for items like car tires, replacement hip joints and bowling balls.

Known as thermosets, this type of plastic boasts a “crosslinked polymer” chemical structure that guarantees longevity but has also made these petrochemical-based materials – which comprise 15%-20% of all polymers produced – impossible to recycle.

“Currently, zero percent of the world’s thermoset materials are recycled – they’re either incinerated or thrown in landfills,” said Brett Fors, professor of chemistry and chemical biology at Cornell.

The Fors lab has addressed that environmental challenge by creating an alternative made from a bio-sourced material that has crosslinked thermosets’ durability and malleability but can be easily recycled and degraded.

“The whole process, from creating to reusing, is more environmentally friendly than current materials,” said Reagan Dreiling, a doctoral student in the field of chemistry and first author of the paper, which published in Nature.

The Fors group studies dihydrofuran (DHF), a monomer – or chemical building block – that can be made from biological materials and has the potential to eventually compete with petroleum-based feedstocks.

Dreiling used DHF, a circular monomer with a double bond, as a building block for two successive polymerizations, the second of which results in a crosslinked polymer that can be recycled through heating and will degrade naturally in the environment.

DHF thermosets show comparable properties to commercial thermosets, including high-density polyurethane (used in electronics instruments, packaging and footwear, for example) and ethylene propylene rubber (used in garden hoses and automotive weatherstripping).

In contrast to current petrochemical thermosets, the DHF-based materials offer a circular economy of use, Fors said. Chemically recyclable, the material can be made back into its building block monomer and used again from scratch. And when some of the material inevitably leaks into the environment, these materials will degrade over time into benign components.

The researchers are working toward applications, including making the DHF-based material useful for 3D printing. They are also experimenting to expand the properties with additional monomers.

“We’ve spent 100 years trying to make polymers that last forever, and we’ve realized that’s not actually a good thing,” Fors said. “Now we’re making polymers that don’t last forever, that can environmentally degrade.”

For additional information, see this Cornell Chronicle story.

-30-

 

Promoting cacao production without sacrificing biodiversity



International research team shows benefits of cacao grafting for farmers and nature alike



University of Göttingen

Researcher Sophie Müller holding a beating cone for the collection of arthropods on cacao plants. 

image: 

Researcher Sophie Müller holding a beating cone for the collection of arthropods on cacao plants.

view more 

Credit: Denise Bertleff




The productivity of cacao trees decreases with time, forcing farmers to renew their plantations by either cutting down the old trees or establishing a new crop elsewhere. Frequently, new plantations are established in areas of the forest that are thinned out to accommodate new, young cacao trees. However, this comes with high economic and ecological costs. An alternative approach is to graft highly productive and native cultivars onto the existing older cacao trees. An international team led by scientists of the University of Göttingen found that cacao grafting is a useful measure to rejuvenate cacao plants, increasing their yield and profits with minimal impact on biodiversity. The results were published in the Journal of Applied Ecology.

 

Cacao grafting consists of implanting a shoot from a promising variety into an adult cacao tree. By making use of the adult root system, grafting young and fresh branches completely replaces the old tree crown in a short time period. This approach has long been used for many crops, but its consequences for cacao production and biodiversity had never been simultaneously tested. Researchers from the universities of Göttingen and Würzburg in Germany, with the organization Bioversity International worked with local farmers in Peru to assess this. The technique focused on grafting high-yielding genotypes from the very highly valued, native variety Cacao Blanco de Piura. “These native varieties have already increased crop yield by 45% after just two years,” says Dr Carolina Ocampo-Ariza, at Göttingen University’s Agroecology group, who led the research. “This is great news for the production of fine flavour cocoa. It shows the value of grafting as a method to improve yields in a short time.”

 

In the first six months after grafting, the researchers monitored the diversity of arthropods – for instance, spiders, mites and insects. “We were afraid that arthropods on the young grafts would be less diverse, because the old voluminous tree crown, including many branches, had been replaced,” says Sophie Müller, former MSc student at Göttingen University and co-leader of the research, “but we actually found that, after a small decline in diversity, especially of predatory arthropods, the community quickly recovered in just six months.” This recovery is particularly good news for the control of insect pests in cacao agroforests, since predatory arthropods may prevent pest outbreaks.

“Our study demonstrates that grafting is a sustainable alternative which rejuvenates old cacao crops. This prevents the expansion of the agricultural frontier into tropical forests,” highlights co-author Professor Teja Tscharntke, Göttingen University.

Original publication: Carolina Ocampo-Ariza, Sophie Müller, et al. Cacao grafting increases crop yield without compromising biodiversity. Journal of Applied Ecology 2025. DoI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14851Full text also available in Spanish in the article’s supplementary material

 Highly productive grafted cacao tree (in background), and a representation of a fresh cacao graft in the bottom left corner. 

Highly productive grafted cacao tree (in background), and a representation of a fresh cacao graft in the bottom left corner.

Credit

Carolina Ocampo Ariza

Carolina Ocampo Ariza next to a mature cacao pod, from the native Peruvian variety “Cacao blanco de Piura”,

Credit

Carolina Ocampo Ariza

Contact:

www.uni-goettingen.de/en/600886.html

www.uni-goettingen.de/en/92552.html


 

New £2 million project to save UK from food shortages



Anglia Ruskin University leads work to identify vulnerabilities and avoid collapse of UK’s food system



Anglia Ruskin University





Anglia Ruskin University (ARU) is leading a new £2 million initiative to help prevent food shortages that could potentially trigger civil unrest in the UK.

The project, called Backcasting to Increase Food System Resilience in the UK, is being led by experts from Anglia Ruskin’s Global Sustainability Institute and has received £2,048,461 in funding from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, part of UK Research and Innovation (UKRI).

Building on recent research that found that over 40% of food experts believe widespread civil unrest linked to food shortages, such as demonstrations and violent looting, is possible or likely in the UK within the next 10 years, the new project aims to urgently address vulnerabilities in the nation’s food supply.

The UK’s food system is currently optimised for efficiency rather than resilience, relying heavily on imports, seasonal labour, and just-in-time supply chains.

This makes it particularly susceptible to disruptions that could lead to a collapse, defined as a situation where the public lack access to affordable food, resulting in economic productivity losses, disease outbreaks, extreme hunger, malnutrition, or civil unrest.

Potential causes of such a collapse include geopolitical instability and conflict around the world, pandemics, extreme weather events exacerbated by climate change, and trade tariffs.

The project aims to identify and find ways of mitigating the potential tipping points that could lead to a collapse and prioritise the areas within the UK food system that urgently need to strengthen their resilience to likely risks and shocks.

To achieve these goals, the researchers will work closely with key stakeholders including food producers, importers, distributers and retailers.

A “backcasting” mapping exercise will be carried out to identify the most likely pathways leading to civil unrest with a focus on addressing problems at the early stages of these pathways, well before any unrest arises.

Anglia Ruskin University is leading the project in partnership with experts from the University of York, the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, the University of the West of England and the Royal Agricultural University.

Other partners include WTW, the Food Farming & Countryside Commission, the Food Ethics Council, WRAP, DEFRA, Trussell, Sustain, Better Food Traders, Samworth Brothers, the Food Standards Agency, the Institute of Grocery Distributors and WWF.

Professor Aled Jones, Director of the Global Sustainability Institute at Anglia Ruskin University (ARU), said: “The Backcasting to Increase Food System Resilience in the UK project is a major investment into understanding how future shocks could significantly impact the UK food system and how we can build resilience to these.

“The food system is exposed to various risks from climate change and biodiversity loss to geopolitical events, such as wars or cyberterrorism. Supporting the UK’s food system stakeholders from farmers through to retail, by working with them to build on their knowledge to deliver a transformation towards resilience, is vital.

“The project will also involve placements inside organisations focusing on food system challenges, to better understand the interventions that may be possible, and allow wider lessons to be captured and shared. These placements will be open to PhDs from across the UK and will be announced in 2026.”