Sunday, February 02, 2025

Trump says he opened California’s water. Local officials say he nearly flooded them.

Camille von Kaenel and Annie Snider
Fri, January 31, 2025 


SACRAMENTO, California — President Donald Trump declared victory on Friday in his long-running water war with California, boasting he sent billions of gallons south — but local officials say they narrowly prevented him from possibly flooding farms.

"Today, 1.6 billion gallons and, in 3 days, it will be 5.2 billion gallons. Everybody should be happy about this long fought Victory! I only wish they listened to me six years ago — There would have been no fire!" he said in a post on his social media site.

Local officials had to talk the Army Corps of Engineers down after it abruptly alerted them Thursday afternoon it was about to increase flows from two reservoirs to maximum capacity — a move the agency said was in response to Trump directing the federal government to "maximize" water supplies.

Before the Corps ratcheted down its plan, local authorities scrambled to move equipment and warn farms about possible flooding, said Victor Hernandez, who oversees water management on one of the rivers, the Kaweah in Tulare County. He said the Corps gave him one hour notice on Thursday.


"I've been here 25 years, and I've never been given notice that quick," Hernandez said.

 "That was alarming and scary."

The incident is the latest chapter in an ongoing feud between Trump and state authorities that has been turbo-charged by the Los Angeles fires, which the president has used to reignite long-running complaints about water management that had nothing to do with the response to the disaster.

An Army Corps spokesperson tied the releases to Trump’s executive order on Sunday directing all federal agencies to maximize water deliveries in order to respond to the fires that started in Los Angeles earlier this month.

"Consistent with the direction in the Executive Order on Emergency Measures to Provide Water Resources in California, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is releasing water from Terminus Dam at Lake Kaweah and Schafer Dam at Success Lake to ensure California has water available to respond to the wildfires," Gene Pawlik said in a statement.

While releasing water from reservoirs before a big storm, like the one expected to hit Northern California this weekend, is standard flood-control procedure to avoid overflowing dams, Hernandez said the Army Corps’ Thursday plan would have released far more water than needed. He said releasing the water at the capacity the Corps had planned to would have flooded both the Kaweah and Tule rivers, where the Corps' reservoirs are located.

"Channel capacity is very dangerous,” Hernandez said. "People don't understand that [with] channel capacity, you're going to have flood damage down below."

Trump since his first term and during his presidential campaigns has repeatedly vowed to send more water to Central Valley farmers in the state's conservative heartland. He incorrectly blamed the temporary lack of water in Los Angeles hydrants during wildfires earlier this month on the state’s water management policies, though the state’s reservoirs are at or near historic levels right now and the hydrants went dry because of the high local demand. He's also threatened to withhold disaster aid unless California goes along with his moves to deliver more water.

Officials from his Department of Government Efficiency visited a federal water-pumping station in Northern California on Monday, after which Trump posted on Truth Social that "The United States Military just entered the Great State of California and, under Emergency Powers, TURNED ON THE WATER." California officials clarified Monday that the federal pumps had been down due to electrical maintenance.

But a former senior Bureau of Reclamation official said moves like the one in Tulare County could endanger property and lives. Reclamation is the primary federal agency with authority over delivering water in the West, while the Army Corps is largely responsible for flood control.

"Something really bad could happen because of their nonsensical approach," the former official, who was granted anonymity because of the issue's political sensitivity, said. "Floods are real. This isn’t playing around with a software company."

Rick Brown, the public affairs officer for the Army Corps of Engineers in Sacramento, said Friday the two reservoirs had hit water levels high enough on Thursday to trigger standard flood control releases.

He referred further questions about the decision to maximize water releases to Army Corps headquarters.

Hernandez said he was told by Jenny Fromm, the Army Corp's chief water manager in Sacramento, that the decision came from “somewhere above.” The White House did not respond to a request for comment on whether it ordered the releases.

Hernandez said that after he resisted the decision, Fromm told him the Corps would release the water at a third of the original planned speed, rather than at maximum capacity. Aaron Fukuda, the general manager of the Tulare Irrigation District, also confirmed the Army Corps reduced flood releases after local officials pushed back.

Firefighters had almost completely contained the Palisades and Eaton fires as of early Friday. The Army Corps did not respond to a question about how the water would reach Los Angeles, about 200 miles away. Hernandez said the water would go to Tulare Lake, a dry lakebed that last filled up during record-high rainfall in 2023.

Other water experts said it would have been nearly impossible to divert the water to Los Angeles at the speed the Corps originally planned to release it. There is a rarely used state valve that can redirect Tulare Lake floodwaters into the aqueduct that carries water further south into Los Angeles, but neither state nor federal officials responded to a question asking if they would turn it on.

Hernandez said he thinks the current releases are still too much because, he said, the reservoir has enough capacity to absorb any coming storm and would not overflow.

Dumping the water from Lake Kaweah and Success Lake poses a flood risk to downstream communities, he said, like the town of Porterville, which nearly flooded during rainstorms in 2023. It also reduces the amount of irrigation water available to farmers during the driest months of the year. The snowpack in the Southern Sierra Nevada that California depends on for water supplies in the summer has dipped to 47 percent of average for this time of year after a dry January, according to state estimates released Friday.

"We need to keep every bit that we have, because this potentially is irrigation water that we have up there," Hernandez said.

He said he and board members at his water district had called on members of Congress to intervene, including Democratic Rep. Jim Costa and Republican Reps. David Valadao and Vince Fong. None responded to requests for comment.

Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla sent Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, whose Defense Department oversees the Army Corps, a letter on Friday night asking him who directed the releases, how the water would be transported to Los Angeles, how much notice was given and what the impact would be on local communities.

"Unscheduled water releases require close coordination with local officials and safety personnel, as well as downstream agricultural water users, in order to reduce flood risks to communities and farms," wrote Padilla. "Based on the urgent concerns I have heard from my constituents, as well as recent reporting, it appears that gravely insufficient notification was given, recklessly endangering residents downstream."

Trump administration's order to release water into San Joaquin Valley raises concern


James Ward, Visalia Times-Delta
Updated Sat, February 1, 2025 

The Army Corps of Engineers' decision to release water on Friday from Kaweah and Success lakes in the San Joaquin Valley to help California fight wildfires is causing concern and confusion among regional water managers and California elected officials.

The Army Corps of Engineers announced on Jan. 30 that it was releasing large amounts of water from Terminus Dam at Lake Kaweah and Schafer Dam at Lake Success in Tulare County, sending water into the San Joaquin Valley.

U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla, a Democrat, wrote the next day to newly confirmed Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, who oversees the Army Corps of Engineers, with questions about the water release.

"Unscheduled water releases require close coordination with local officials and safety personnel, as well as downstream agricultural water users, in order to reduce flood risks to communities and farms," Padilla wrote. "Based on the urgent concerns I have heard from my constituents, as well as recent reporting, it appears that gravely insufficient notification was given, recklessly endangering residents downstream.”

Congressman Jim Costa (D-Fresno), who represents parts of Tulare County, also wrote to Hegseth on Saturday with concerns.

"An unscheduled release of water at this time of year, when there is little demand for irrigation water and a snowpack that is below average, poses grave threats to a reliable water supply this year," Costa wrote. "This could increase the cost of water for farmers for this crop year exponentially due to dry conditions anticipated."

The offices of Republican congressmen Vince Fong and David Valadao — who both also represent parts of Tulare County — have not responded to questions about the water releases.

Here's what to know about the release of water from Kaweah and Success lakes in the San Joaquin Valley.



Why was water released from Kaweah and Success lakes?


The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which manages Kaweah and Success lakes, said the water release was in response to President Trump’s Jan. 24 executive order to obtain more water to fight southern California wildfires.

“Consistent with the direction in the Executive Order on Emergency Measures to Provide Water Resources in California, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is releasing water from Terminus Dam at Lake Kaweah and Schafer Dam at Success Lake to ensure California has water available to respond to the wildfires,” wrote Gene Pawlik, a supervising public affairs specialist in the Army Corps’ Washington, D.C. office.

Costa, though, took issue with Trump, saying the link between the Southern California wildfires and Central Valley water policy was false.

"Furthermore, the two rivers by which Terminus Dam and Schafer Dam feed into, the Kaweah River and the Tule River, do not flow into Los Angeles," Costa wrote.

Lake Success was formed when the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers constructed and opened Success Dam on the Tule River in Tulare County in 1961. The following year, Lake Kaweah opened after the Terminus Dam was built on the Kaweah River in Tulare County. Both projects help reduce flood damage and conserve water for farmland irrigation.

Tulare County is one of the nation's and state's most productive agricultural regions, with the largest citrus crop in the country. In addition, the county has large grape, pistachio, and almond crops.

Will water from Lake Success and Lake Kaweah help fight wildfires?

San Joaquin Valley water managers told SJV Water, a website that extensively covers Central California water issues, that physical and legal barriers make it virtually impossible to use Tulare County river water for southern California wildfire abatement.


“Every drop belongs to someone,” Kaweah River Watermaster Victor Hernandez told SJV Water. “The reservoir may belong to the federal government, but the water is ours. If someone’s playing political games with this water, it’s wrong.”


Dan Vink, a longtime Tulare County water manager and principal partner at Six-33 Solutions, a water and natural resource firm in Visalia, told SJV Water the decision to release water "was clearly made by someone with no understanding of the system."


“A decision to take summer water from local farmers and dump it out of these reservoirs shows a complete lack of understanding of how the system works and sets a very dangerous precedent,” Vink said.

How much water is being released from Lake Success and Lake Kaweah?

SJV Water is reporting releases from the Tule River at 798 cubic feet per second from 55 cubic feet per second before the increase. Kaweah flows went from 5 cubic feet per second to 1,545 cubic feet per second.

Aaron Fukuda, general manager of the Tulare Irrigation District, told SJV Water that's where water flows were expected to stay.

“Normally, these kinds of flood releases are done with a lot of notification and coordination,” Fukuda said. “I’ve been doing this 18 years and have never seen something like this.”

Water managers are capturing flows in recharge basins, Eric Limas, General Manager for the Lower Tule River and Pixley irrigation districts, told SJV Water.

“I have no idea if this is the new norm for operations or not. I certainly hope not.”

SJV Water reported that more water would have been released Friday into the San Joaquin Valley before local irrigation managers raised alarm bells Thursday when they were told releases would reach "channel capacity" for both dams: 5,500 cubic feet per second for Lake Kaweah and 3,500 cubic feet per second for Lake Success.

Water releases of that magnitude were similar to the 2023 floods that caused chaos in the San Joaquin Valley after an unprecedented atmospheric river dumped massive amounts of rainfall in California.

Vink told the Los Angeles Times that a water release that large should be coordinated with farmers to move farm equipment away from riverbanks and other areas that could be flooded. Local public safety officials would also be involved to ensure that any potential homeless encampments near riverbanks were evacuated.

In his letter to Hegseth, Costa wrote the release of that amount of water "could overwhelm and flood downstream communities."

"Unilateral actions like this can seriously harm the work that has been undertaken to increase sustainability and resiliency amidst the worsening effects of climate change," Costa wrote.

This article originally appeared on Visalia Times-Delta


Farmers Plead ‘Stop Our Fields Flooding’ as Trump Opens Dams

Liam Archacki
Sat, February 1, 2025


Photo Illustration by Victoria Sunday/The Daily Beast/Getty Images


Local officials in California have revealed that President Donald Trump nearly flooded the region’s farms when his administration tried to send an excessive amount of water south, a feat he bragged about on Friday.

“Today, 1.6 billion gallons and, in 3 days, it will be 5.2 billion gallons. Everybody should be happy about this long fought Victory!” Trump gloated in a Truth Social post.

Over the last month, the president has often pushed for more water to be directed to southern California to help fight the fires that have devastated the area.

Behind the scenes on Friday, though, officials told Politico that they had to talk down the Army Corps of Engineers after they were alerted on short notice about a sudden—and excessive—influx of water.

The Army Corps was set to turn two reservoirs to max capacity, a decision the agency later told Politico was in response to Trump’s directive that the federal government “maximize” water supplies.

Donald Trump followed by First Lady Melania Trump, shakes hands with California Governor Gavin Newsom upon arrival at Los Angeles International Airport in Los Angeles, California, on January 24, 2025, to visit the region devastated by the Palisades and Eaton fires. / MANDEL NGAN / AFP via Getty Images

Victor Hernandez, who manages the water on a river in Tulare County, said he scrambled to alert farmers to the possibility of flooding before the Corps backed off. He said he was only given one hour of notice.

“I’ve been here 25 years, and I’ve never been given notice that quick,” Hernandez said. “That was alarming and scary.”

After pushback from multiple officials, including Hernandez, the Army Corps agreed to release the water at one third of the originally planned speed, Hernandez said.

A spokesperson for the Corps, Gene Pawlik, told Politico that the releases were “consistent” with Trump’s executive order to provide water to fight the wildfires in southern California.

A firefighter truck backs up from flames of smoke from the new Hughes Fire at the Lake Hughes Road in Castaic, a northwestern neighborhood of Los Angeles, California, on January 22, 2025. / APU GOMES / AFP via Getty Images

Multiple water management experts told Politico that moves like the one initially planned to hit Tulare County could have serious consequences.

“Something really bad could happen because of their nonsensical approach,” said a former official at Bureau of Reclamation, the primary agency responsible for delivering water in the western U.S. “Floods are real. This isn’t playing around with a software company.”

Hernandez was in agreement.

“Channel capacity is very dangerous,” he said. “People don’t understand that [with] channel capacity, you’re going to have flood damage down below.”

Experts told The New York Times that the water released by the Army Corps on Friday has no way of reaching the region affected by the wildfires, which is over 200 miles away, and could have been useful to farmers months from now as irrigation.

As of Saturday, the Palisades and Eaton fires, which raged near Los Angeles, are 100 percent contained, according to Los Angeles Daily News.


Trump has vowed to pump more water. Government data show pumping was down for maintenance

Ian James
Fri, January 31, 2025 

The intakes at the C.W. "Bill" Jones Pumping Plant in Tracy, Calif., deliver water from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta to the aqueducts of the federally managed Central Valley Project. (Katie Falkenberg / Los Angeles Times)

When President Trump visited Los Angeles last week, he pledged to “open up the pumps and valves in the north” and “get that water pouring down here.”

But records show that the day he made that announcement, the federal government’s pumping facility in Northern California was delivering less water than usual, apparently because managers had reduced pumping for several days of routine maintenance.

The records indicate that the day after Trump’s announcement, on Saturday, the federally managed pumping plant resumed regular levels of water deliveries from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta into the aqueducts of the Central Valley Project.

The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’s daily pumping data for the Jones Pumping Plant shows that on Jan. 21, the amount of water pumped decreased to about 1,900 acre-feet, down from about 6,900 acre-feet the day before. Pumping continued at reduced levels of about 1,800 acre-feet each day from Jan. 22 through Jan. 24, when Trump visited Los Angeles.

The pumping returned to higher levels on Saturday, Jan. 25, delivering 5,300 acre-feet of water that day, or about 1.7 billion gallons.

On Monday night, Trump said on social media that the U.S. military had “entered” California and “TURNED ON THE WATER,” a claim that state officials promptly denied.

The California Department of Water Resources responded in a statement: “The military did not enter California. The federal government restarted federal water pumps after they were offline for maintenance for three days.”

Read more: Trump social media claim of using troops to force water flow is refuted by California

Gov. Gavin Newsom responded at a news conference in Los Angeles on Tuesday.

“There were no military sent to the Central Valley. That was reported but wasn't in evidence,” Newsom said.


He said the federal government was doing maintenance on the Central Valley Project from Jan. 21 to Jan. 24.

“Between the 21st and 24th, the federal government was doing maintenance on their system. It's maintenance that is well coordinated with the State Water Project that does not end pumping,” Newsom said.

For four days, maintenance work on power transmission lines prevented operation of another pumping plant south of the Delta near San Luis Reservoir, which led managers to reduce pumping at the Jones Pumping Plant.

“On the 24th, that maintenance ended, and they started turning back on the pumps,” Newsom said. “It takes a few days to get the pumps back to 100%, and perhaps that was what they were celebrating.”

The Bureau of Reclamation, which manages the Central Valley Project, did not respond to requests for information about the maintenance that temporarily reduced water deliveries.
ADVERTISEMENT


The unofficial Department of Government Efficiency, which Trump plans to consult for recommendations on cutting government spending, said in a social media post that it congratulates the administration for “more than doubling the Federally pumped water flowing toward Southern California.”

According to the government data, the Trump administration has not yet increased pumping above the levels that the federal facility was drawing from the Delta under the Biden administration earlier this month. (On Tuesday, the pumping plant delivered nearly 6,900 acre-feet. On Wednesday, that decreased somewhat to about 5,100 acre-feet, and on Thursday, pumping returned to more than 6,800 acre-feet.)

Read more: Trump reenters California’s water wars. It's unclear who will win

Water experts have pointed out that Trump made several inaccurate statements on social media and during his L.A. visit. For example, he said he was opening up the flow of water “from the Pacific Northwest” and “parts of Canada” — from where California has no aqueducts, pipelines or other avenues for water flow.

He also said he intended to increase the flow of water to Los Angeles, even though urban areas of Southern California are supplied not by the federally managed Central Valley Project but by the State Water Project, the other main north-to-south water conduit in the region — which hasn’t been directly affected by his executive orders.
ADVERTISEMENT


“I don't think he's interested in water. I think he's interested in other things — for which this is perhaps a rhetorical vehicle,” said Jay Lund, a UC Davis emeritus professor of civil and environmental engineering.

Lund said he thinks one aim of Trump’s statements might be “keeping other people off balance,” including political adversaries in California.

“He likes to occupy space, it seems,” Lund said. “He's not doing things that would actually provide water. He's setting up some rhetorical conditions for perhaps other things he's interested in accomplishing.”

The intake channel at the C.W. "Bill" Jones Pumping Plant in Tracy, Calif., in 2016. (Los Angeles Times)

Trump has clashed with Newsom on California water policy and has repeatedly criticized environmental protections for endangered fish species in the Delta, which place constraints on water deliveries.

Trump issued an order on Sunday directing federal agencies to “maximize” water deliveries in California and “override” state policies if necessary.

Lund noted, however, that the movement of water in California is largely controlled by local and regional agencies. Because of state environmental laws and other factors, he said, the president is generally “not in a strong position to greatly alter how California manages water.”

“You're never quite sure where it's going to lead to. But he does business by menacing a bit,” Lund said. “My impression of this is, a lot of these things are really more signaling rather than substance.”

If Trump eventually increases federal pumping via the federally controlled Central Valley Project, that would primarily benefit the agriculture industry in the San Joaquin Valley, sending more water flowing to farms that produce almonds, pistachios, tomatoes and other crops. The CVP ends in the southern San Joaquin Valley near Bakersfield and does not reach Southern California’s urban areas to the south.

Lund and other experts have pointed out that because state flow requirements to protect endangered fish will remain in place regardless of any federal changes, an increase in pumping by the federal system could, in theory, lead to a decrease in pumping by the State Water Project and less water flowing to urban Southern California.

“He might be arguing about the share of federal versus state pumping, but I don't see much promise in being able to increase the total amount of pumping,” Lund said.

Read more: Trump wants to upend California water policy. State officials say it could do harm

Trump has repeatedly claimed that the wildfires in Southern California underscored why the state should be delivering more water south from the Delta. But California water managers have said L.A. and other cities are not currently short of water, pointing out that the region’s reservoirs are at record-high levels.

State officials have also said that pumping to move water south from the Delta has nothing to do with the local fire response in Los Angeles.

Even with ample supplies in reservoirs, local water systems were pushed to their limits as the fires rapidly spread, driven by strong winds.

When the L.A. water system lost pressure in parts of Pacific Palisades, some fire hydrants ran dry in high-elevation areas, hindering the firefighting effort. Newsom has ordered an investigation into the loss of pressure to hydrants and the lack of water available from a reservoir in Pacific Palisades that was out of commission for repairs.

In his latest executive order, Trump criticized “disastrous” policies and water “mismanagement” by California, and directed federal agencies to scrap a plan that the Biden administration adopted last month, establishing new rules for operating the Central Valley Project and the State Water Project.

Instead, Trump told federal agencies to more or less follow a plan adopted during his first presidency, which California and environmental groups successfully challenged in court.

Karla Nemeth, director of the California Department of Water Resources, responded to Trump’s order earlier this week saying the directive has no immediate impact on operations of the State Water Project, which supplies water for 27 million people.

Nemeth said the current rules for the operations of the two water systems in the Delta actually supply Californians with more water than they’d have access to under Trump’s 2020 rules, since the latest plan was written based on new science and with added flexibility to “respond more nimbly to real-time conditions” in rivers and the Delta.

“To abandon these new frameworks would harm California water users and protection of native fish species,” Nemeth said.


This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.



Acting on Trump's order, federal officials opened up two California dams

Ian James, Jessica Garrison
Fri, January 31, 2025 


Aerial view of Success Dam, which feeds into the Tule River. 
(Robert Gauthier/Los Angeles Times)


The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has dramatically increased the amount of water flowing from two dams in Tulare County, sending massive flows down river channels toward farmlands in the San Joaquin Valley.

Federal records show that water releases from Terminus Dam at Lake Kaweah and Schafer Dam at Lake Success jumped early Friday morning.

The sudden increase occurred four days after President Trump said on social media that the U.S. military had “entered” California and “TURNED ON THE WATER." Trump also vowed during a visit to Los Angeles last week to "open up the valves and pumps" in California to deliver more water.

According to federal data, the flow from Terminus Dam into the Kaweah River near Visalia increased from 57 cubic feet per second to more than 1,500 on Friday morning. The flow from Lake Success near Porterville into the Tule River increased from 105 cubic feet per second to 990.

The Army Corps of Engineers is “conducting controlled water releases” from the two dams, said Tyler Stalker, a spokesperson for the Corps in Sacramento. “The action is being coordinated with local officials. The releases are within the capacity of the downstream waterways.”

Responding to questions about the reasons for the sudden increase in water flow, Gene Pawlik, a spokesperson at the Corps' headquarters in Washington, said in an email that the action was “consistent with the direction" in Trump's recent executive order to enact "emergency measures to provide water resources" in California.

Pawlik said the Army Corps was releasing water from the dams "to ensure California has water available to respond to the wildfires." It was not immediately clear how or where the federal government intends to transport the water.

Read more: Trump reenters California’s water wars. It's unclear who will win

Trump, meanwhile, shared a photo on X of water pouring from a dam, saying: "Photo of beautiful water flow that I just opened in California."

"Today, 1.6 billion gallons and, in 3 days, it will be 5.2 billion gallons. Everybody should be happy about this long fought Victory!," Trump wrote. "I only wish they listened to me six years ago — There would have been no fire!"

The president has sought to link local water supply problems during the L.A. County firestorms, such as fire hydrants that ran dry, with his calls for changing water management elsewhere in the state. But state officials and water experts have called the comments inaccurate: Regional reservoirs in Southern California are at record-high levels, and more water from Northern California would not have affected the fire response.

Water was released from the dams as the first of two approaching atmospheric river storms brought snow and rain to California.


The Success Dam feeds into the Tule River. (Robert Gauthier/Los Angeles Times)

Dam managers in California sometimes release water ahead of major storms to make room in reservoirs for more runoff. But the federal agency's comments about Trump's executive order suggest that this case was different.

State officials were “not part of the decision-making” to release water from the federal reservoirs, said Karla Nemeth, director of the California Department of Water Resources.

“We traditionally have a high degree of coordination at the operational level, which really wasn't a part of this decision,” Nemeth said.

The two reservoirs are used to hold supplies for agricultural irrigation districts. Nemeth noted that winter is not the irrigation season for farms, which require more supplies to grow crops in the summer months, “so there isn't a demand” for the water in the San Joaquin Valley at this time.

The dams are also used to regulate the pace of floodwaters that could otherwise affect downstream areas, Nemeth said. During historic storms in 2023, she said, the state sought to work with local landowners to capture flood flows where possible to replenish groundwater.

“I really can't speak to the decision process at the Corps to make this release at this time,” she said.

It was not clear where federal officials intended to send the water that was being released from the dams.

Local water managers said they were caught off-guard by the federal government's plans on Thursday. Dan Vink, a water consultant who previously served as general manager of the Lower Tule River Irrigation District, called the situation "extremely unprecedented."

Vink said local water officials heard Thursday afternoon that the Army Corps planned to "go from a fairly nominal release to channel capacity in two hours."

A release of that magnitude, he said, would normally be coordinated days in advance, in part because farmers might have expensive farm equipment placed near riverbanks. There are also homeless encampments near some riverbanks, and officials would want to make sure people were out of the way and not in danger before unleashing so much water.


People look at a full pool of water behind Schafer Dam forming Lake Success on the Tule River in the Central Valley during a winter storm in Tulare County east of Porterville, Calif., in March 2023. (Patrick T. Fallon/Getty Images)

The local water managers on Thursday communicated their concerns to the Army Corps officials, who agreed to release less water than originally planned and to delay the releases until Friday, Vink said.

Aaron Fukuda, general manager of the Tulare Irrigation District, told the news site SJV Water that normally such flood releases are done with a great deal of prior notification and coordination. "I've been doing this 18 years and have never seen something like this," he said.

Peter Gleick, a water scientist and senior fellow at the Pacific Institute, said dam managers would typically only release large quantities of water in the winter when major storms create a need to make space for large inflows of runoff. But Southern California has been very dry and the snowpack in the southern Sierra remains far below average, so "there is no indication that that's why these releases occurred."

"In addition, when those kinds of releases do occur, they're always done in consultation with local and state agencies," Gleick said.

"I don't know where this water is going, but this is the wrong time of year to be releasing water from these reservoirs. It's vitally important that we fill our reservoirs in the rainy season so water is available for farms and cities later in the summer," Gleick said. "I think it's very strange and it's disturbing that, after decades of careful local, state and federal coordination, some federal agencies are starting to unilaterally manipulate California's water supply."

Vink agreed, saying that given how dry it has been in the region this winter, there was no need to make such a release. In fact, he said, farmers were counting on that water to be available for summer irrigation.

"This is going to hurt farmers," Vink said. "This takes water out of their summer irrigation portfolio."

Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla criticized the administration’s decision and demanded answers.

“Unscheduled water releases require close coordination with local officials and safety personnel, as well as downstream agricultural water users, in order to reduce flood risks to communities and farms,” Padilla said in a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. “Based on the urgent concerns I have heard from my constituents, as well as recent reporting, it appears that gravely insufficient notification was given, recklessly endangering residents downstream.”

Padilla asked Hegseth several questions, including who made the decision, how much advance notice was given to irrigation districts and local officials, and what impact the releases will have on communities and landowners. He also asked: “If the purpose of these releases is to help fight wildfires in Los Angeles County (which are already almost fully contained), what is the plan to transport this water to Los Angeles rather than let the water simply be discharged into Tulare Lake where it will evaporate?”

Meanwhile, Gov. Gavin Newsom took other actions to adjust how the state is managing water. With two storms approaching on Friday, Newsom signed an executive order that aims to divert and store more storm runoff.

The order directs the Department of Water Resources and other state agencies to maximize the storage and capture of water from rivers to recharge groundwater and boost reservoirs such as San Luis Reservoir, located south of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.

"It is more important than ever that we maximize every opportunity to recharge our groundwater supplies," Newsom said.

“We are also preparing to use every last drop to boost our water supply for communities and farms throughout the state,” Newsom said. “By storing these stormwaters, we are creating a literal rainy day fund to help us recover from a multiyear drought and prepare for our hotter, drier future.”

This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Ex-Skydance Executive Escapes Prison Time After Admitting To “Recklessly” Operating Drone That Crashed Into Super Scooper During L.A. Wildfires

Dominic Patten
DEADLINE
Fri, January 31, 2025


Peter Akemann, the former president of Skydance Interactive who was the owner and pilot of a drone that damaged and temporarily grounded a Canadian Super Scooper during some of the most destructive days of the Los Angeles wildfires, has escaped a prison sentence.

In fact, thanks to a plea deal with the feds and an apparent software glitch, Akemann won’t serve a single day in prison for “recklessly” flying his DJI Mini 3 Pro into the wing of the Canadair CL-415 Super Scooper on January 9, Acting United States Attorney Joseph T. McNally said Friday.

More from Deadline

'Real Time': Bill Maher Cracks Joke About L.A. Water Pressure After Devastating Wildfires


Lady Gaga & Bruno Mars To Perform L.A. Tribute During Grammys


Paramount Global In Discussions With Donald Trump To Settle Lawsuit Over Kamala Harris' '60 Minutes' Interview - Update
ADVERTISEMENT


Appearing in court in downtown LA this afternoon on a criminal misdemeanor and one count of unsafe operation of an unmanned aircraft, the 56-year-old Akemann soon afterwards walked out the door on a $15,000 bond. He will formally enter a guilty plea at an unspecified date.

Outside the federal courthouse, McNally said that Akemann acknowledged his “conduct posed an imminent threat to firefighting crews.”

Despite the loss of a pivotal aircraft for five days in the battle against the Palisades Fire that devastated most of the upmarket neighborhood and the risk the so-called illegal drone posed to the two-member crew of the Quebec-based plane, the former video game exec will only have to fork out a bit more than $65,000 to the Canadian province to cover plane repairs.

According to the Department of Justice, the Culver City-based Akemann will also have to “complete 150 hours of community service in support of the 2025 Southern California wildfire relief effort” – whatever that means now that the hurricane-force winds and fires have subsided.

“As this case demonstrates, we will track down drone operators who violate the law and interfere with the critical work of our first responders,” McNally said Friday.

Maybe, but some want a bit more than merely tracking down such individuals.

“This is not justice,” one industry Palisades resident who suffered greatly during the fires told Deadline today after news of Akemann’s plea deal went public. “I’m not saying it would have, but that plane could have maybe saved homes and businesses if it hadn’t been damaged.”

The Super Scooper accident was widely covered on local and national media during the fires, with shock outside Southern California that private drones were even allowed in firefighting zones at the time.

The probe to find Akemann was led by the FBI. With Assistant U.S. Attorneys Kedar S. Bhatia and Ian V. Yanniello of the Terrorism and Export Crimes Section in the prosecuting seat, the Department of Transportation’s Office of Inspector General, the FAA, the LAFD, and CalFire also aided in the investigation, the feds said Friday.

Akemann, who worked at the David Ellison-run Skydance from 2016 until around 2022, apparently took his drone to the top of a parking lot at the Third Street Promenade in Santa Monica on January 9 as the fires raged. Prosecutors say his intent was to get some footage of the blazes, but Akemann lost sight and control of the DJI Mini 3 Pro after it had flown about 1.5 miles away. It was then that the drone collided with the Super Scooper, opening a 3- by 6-inch hole in the left wing. The damage took the vitally needed plane out of commission.

The Canadian Super Scooper that collided with an illegal drone at a maintenance hangar at Van Nuys Airport

Emphasizing that their client is “deeply sorry” and “accepts responsibility for his grave error in judgment,” Akemann’s lawyers Glen T. Jonas and Vicki Podberesky said today that the loss of control was based in part on the failure of the drone’s “geofencing safeguard feature.”

On January 13, four days after the crash, the drone company DJI Viewpoints brought out an update for its products.

“With this update, DJI’s Fly and Pilot flight app operators will see prior DJI geofencing datasets replaced to display official Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) data,” according to the company. “Areas previously defined as Restricted Zones (also known as No-Fly Zones) will be displayed as Enhanced Warning Zones, aligning with the FAA’s designated areas. In these zones, in-app alerts will notify operators flying near FAA designated controlled airspace, placing control back in the hands of the drone operators, in line with regulatory principles of the operator bearing final responsibility.”



Man agrees to plead guilty for flying drone that damaged firefighting aircraft in LA wildfire

Jaimie Ding And Olga R. Rodriguez
Fri, January 31, 2025 
The Associated Press

LOS ANGELES (AP) — The pilot of a drone that crashed into a firefighting plane, leaving a gaping hole and grounding the aircraft during the deadly Palisades Fire in Los Angeles, has agreed to plead guilty to a misdemeanor count of unsafely operating a drone, federal authorities said Friday.

Peter Tripp Akemann faces up to one year in prison, and a judge will determine his sentence, acting U.S. attorney Joseph McNally said. As part of the plea agreement, he will have to complete 150 hours of wildfire-related community service and pay $65,000 in restitution for the damage to the plane, McNally said.

Akemann appeared in court Friday and will remain out of jail under court supervision during his case. He has not yet entered his plea.

Authorities say Akemann launched the drone from the top of a parking structure in Santa Monica on Jan. 9 and flew it more than 1.5 miles toward the Palisades Fire before losing sight of it. It then crashed with the Super Scooper that was carrying two firefighters. The planes can scoop 1,500 gallons (6,000 liters) of water in just seconds.
ADVERTISEMENT


The wind-driven blaze in the upscale Pacific Palisades began Jan. 7, destroying or damaging nearly 8,000 homes, businesses and other structures and killing at least 12 people. Drone operations were prohibited in the area at the time due to the firefight. The conflagration was fueled by dry Santa Ana winds and has scorched at least 36 square miles (94 square kilometers) of land. It was 98% contained as of Friday.

In a statement handed out to the media, defense attorney Glen Jonas said Akemann was “deeply sorry for the mistake he made" and “accepts responsibility for his grave error in judgment.”

Federal authorities emphasized Friday it was the responsibility of drone owners to know the rules, and there would be consequences for breaking them, especially as Los Angeles gears up to host several major events in coming years, including the World Cup, the Super Bowl and the Olympics.

“The FAA has very strict guidelines about registering drones and where drones can be flown. The onus is on the pilot, if firefighters are putting out a fire with aircraft that should be a clue,” said Akil Davis, the assistant director in charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office.

The Super Scooper, which was owned by the government of Quebec, was grounded for several days. The pilot was able to land the aircraft despite a hole in the left wing caused by the collision with the drone.

Davis said there was no evidence Akemann intentionally caused the collision.

“Lack of common sense and ignorance of your duty as a drone pilot will not shield you from criminal charges,” he said.

The fire in the hilly Los Angeles neighborhood, home to Hollywood stars like Jamie Lee Curtis and Billy Crystal who lost houses in the fire, forced thousands of people from their homes, and knocked out power to tens of thousands.

Investigators are still trying to determine what caused the fire. Officials have placed the origin of blaze behind a home on Piedra Morada Drive, which sits above a densely wooded arroyo.

Another wind-whipped fire that started the same day in Altadena, a community about 35 miles (56 kilometers) east of Pacific Palisades, killed at least 17 people and destroyed or damaged more than 10,000 homes and other buildings.

The Santa Ana winds have turned seasonal wildfires into infernos that have leveled neighborhoods in and around Los Angeles, where there has been no significant rainfall in more than eight months.

___

Rodriguez reported from San Francisco. ___ This story has been updated to reflect that AP incorrectly reported that acting U.S. attorney Joseph McNally said Akemann will avoid prison time. McNally said Akemann faces up to a year in prison and a federal judge will determine his sentence.

Jaimie Ding And Olga R. Rodriguez, The Associated Press
California legislation would allow victims to sue oil and gas companies over disasters

Terry Collins, USA TODAY
Updated Fri, January 31, 2025 

Two California Democratic lawmakers have introduced legislation that could allow people and insurers to sue oil and gas companies for damages sparked by climate change-related disasters such as wildfires and mudslides.

The Affordable Insurance and Climate Recovery Act, authored by state Sens. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco and Sasha Renée Pérez, D-Pasadena, accuses fossil fuel companies of misleading the public about the impact of their products on climate change.

The bill comes during the very early recovery stages of the devastating wildfires in Southern California earlier this month which have killed at least 28 people and burned more than 35,000 acres. If the measure passes, California would be the first state in the U.S. to allow for such legal action, Wiener told reporters at a news conference Monday in Sacramento.

"We are all paying for these disasters, but there is one stakeholder that is not paying: the fossil fuel industry, which makes the product that is fueling the climate change," said Wiener, flanked by consumer protection and environmental group advocates. "The fossil fuel industry has endless resources, its profits just continue to spiral and spiral into the stratosphere. And we are left holding the bag in terms of paying for these disasters."


The source: 'Hotter, drier, and more flammable': Scientists say climate change fueled LA fires


Lawmakers: 'Time for Big Oil to take responsibility'

Due to the spike in climate-driven natural disasters, seven of the top 12 insurance companies in California have paused or limited new business in the last year and a half, despite rate increases approved or pending with the state's insurance department.

Under the proposed measure, people insurance businesses impacted by natural disasters may be able to recoup losses from fossil fuel corporations. Among the insurance companies would be those under California's FAIR Plan, the state insurance option for those who can't get private insurance and are considered by some as a last resort.

Wiener said fossil fuel companies need to be a part of the solution for home and business owners who lose their properties.

"By forcing the fossil fuel companies driving the climate crisis to pay their fair share, we can help stabilize our insurance market and make the victims of climate disasters whole," Wiener added in a statement announcing the bill.


LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - JANUARY 8: A firefighter stands on top of a fire truck to battle the Palisades Fire while it burns homes on the Pacific Coast Highway amid a powerful windstorm on January 8, 2025 in Los Angeles, California. The fast-moving wildfire has grown to more than 2900-acres and is threatening homes in the coastal neighborhood amid intense Santa Ana Winds and dry conditions in Southern California. (Photo by Apu Gomes/Getty Images)More

Pérez pointed to the devastating impact of the wildfires, including the Eaton Fire, which burned more than 14,000 acres alone and destroyed more than 9,000 structures in her district.

"The reality is that climate change is here, and the fossil fuel industry has known this for decades," Pérez said in a statement. "Now, communities like mine are paying the price, and it’s time for Big Oil to take responsibility."

Amid the tragedy: 'What America should look like:' loss in the Altadena fires, and a hard road to recovery


Opponent says real solutions are needed, not theatrics

The suit already has its detractors. The Western States Petroleum Association, which represents oil and gas companies in five states, said it will oppose it. In a statement, president and CEO Catherine Reheis-Boyd said state lawmakers are using the wildfires to "scapegoat" the industry. The state's economy heavily depends on oil and gas, even as California looks to reduce its carbon footprint, she said.

"We need real solutions to help victims in the wake of this tragedy, not theatrics,” Reheis-Boyd said. "Voters are tired of this approach."

California State Sen. Roger Niello, R-Roseville, the vice chair of the Senate's Insurance Committee, told reporters at Monday's news conference that he takes exception to the bill.

"This furthers the false narrative that this is all about climate change. It is of course much more complicated than that," said Niello, noting he believes the state's Democratic leaders underfund forest management projects statewide and Los Angeles leaders cut funds from the fire department's budget.

"Do those issues have anything to do with the conflagration that we've seen in Southern California? I think so," Niello said. "So will Senator Wiener and Perez include in their bill the ability to sue those entities for their role in this, too?" Niello asked.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Calif. lawmakers want oil, gas companies to pay for natural disasters


Dem bill blames LA wildfire damage on fossil fuel emissions, holds oil and gas industry liable

Aubrie Spady
FOX NEWS
Fri, January 31, 2025 

California Democrats are attempting to make state oil and gas companies pay for damage caused by the Los Angeles wildfires, claiming that fossil fuel emissions are to blame for the deadly disaster.

A new Democrat-introduced bill, the Affordable Insurance and Climate Recovery Act, if passed, would allow for "victims of climate disasters," such as the L.A. fires, and insurance groups to sue oil and gas companies for damages under the claim that their emissions fueled the raging fires.

Democrat state Sen. Scott Wiener, who introduced the bill this week, said that fossil fuel companies should pay for fire damage, because they are "driving the climate crisis."

"Californians shouldn’t be the only ones to pay the costs of devastating climate disasters. From last year’s floods to the fires in LA, we know that the fossil fuel industry bears ultimate responsibility for fueling these disasters," state Sen. Scott Wiener wrote in a post on X announcing the legislation.

Trump Meets With California Residents, Fire And Law Enforcement Officials To See La Wildfire Damage First Hand


Flames from the Palisades Fire burn a building on Sunset Boulevard amid a powerful windstorm on Jan. 8, 2025, in the Pacific Palisades neighborhood of Los Angeles.

The bill, which received the backing of several state lawmakers, comes as Democrats have attempted to blame the recent fires on climate change rather than state and city policies, which have faced heightened criticism in the weeks following the deadly blaze

Just months before the wildfire, the city of Los Angeles slashed the fire department funding by over $17 million. The L.A. fire chief said that there are "not enough firefighters in L.A. County to address four separate fires of this magnitude."

Newsom Thanks Trump For Coming To California To Tour Fire Damage In Tarmac Face-off

"We pay the highest taxes in California. Our fire hydrants were empty. Our vegetation was overgrown, brush not cleared. Our reservoirs were emptied by our governor because tribal leaders wanted to save fish. Our fire department budget was cut by our mayor. But thank god drug addicts are getting their drug kits," actress Sara Foster wrote in a post on X. "@MayorOfLA @GavinNewsom RESIGN. Your far-left policies have ruined our state. And also our party."


President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump tour a fire-affected area in the Pacific Palisades neighborhood of Los Angeles on Jan. 24, 2025.

Trump used the power of his pen this week to sign an executive order to override the state's environmental policies in order to create more water availability in the L.A. area.

In the executive order issued on Sunday, Trump called on federal agencies to override regulations potentially limiting water availability in the area, such as the Endangered Species Act (ESA), which seeks to minimize water infrastructure to protect certain fish species, such as the Delta smelt.

The order comes just weeks after Trump accused Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., of caring more about protecting an endangered fish species than the state's residents amid the wildfires.
Palisades and Eaton fires now 100% contained. But a long road to recovery looms

Clara Harter
Sat, February 1, 2025
Los Angeles Times


Lashonda Ellis comforts her grandmother Margaret Martin, 96, who lost her Altadena home built by her husband, Henry Martin, in 1966.
 (Robert Gauthier / Los Angeles Times)
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.Generate Key Takeaways


Fire crews have reached a milestone in the devastating firestorm that rained embers and terror across Los Angeles County, achieving 100% containment of the Palisades and Eaton fires Friday evening.

But a long road to recovery looms ahead, with thousands of Angelenos left without homes, and entire neighborhoods left flattened.

Estimates of the total economic loss are more than $250 billion, which would make the fires one of the costliest natural disasters in U.S. history. More than 124,000 individuals have registered for assistance from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, according to Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass' office.

Read more: Estimated cost of fire damage balloons to more than $250 billion

Both blazes ignited on Jan. 7 and quickly exploded in size — fanned by fierce Santa Ana wind gusts and critically low humidity rates that prompted the National Weather Service to issue its most severe fire weather warning.

The Palisades fire went on to char 23,448 acres in the area of Pacific Palisades, Topanga and Malibu, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Over 6,800 structures were destroyed, including many residences and iconic businesses along Pacific Coast Highway and homes in the hills above. At least 12 people were killed.

The Eaton fire tore a path of destruction through 14,021 acres in and around Altadena and Pasadena, razing over 9,400 structures and claiming 17 lives. It took a heavy toll on the historically Black community of Altadena, where many families of color had used their homes to accumulate generational wealth.

Read more: Against all odds, Black residents built something remarkable in Altadena. Then the fire came

Although the fires have been contained, massive piles of debris remain, as does the challenge of repopulating neighborhoods with crippled infrastructure and riddled with hazardous waste.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has announced an ambitious 30-day timeline to remove hazardous waste by establishing temporary debris processing sites near Topanga Canyon and Irwindale. Both sites have generated fierce resistance from local residents worried about the potential impacts on human and environmental health.

On Friday afternoon, Bass announced the planned reopening of Pacific Palisades to the general public, which has also upset residents, who are worried about toxic debris, looters and lookie-loos.

While fire season has yet to come to an official end, a rainstorm next week is expected to help push the county closer to the precipitation levels needed to do so.

Read more: Three atmospheric river storms are headed for California. Will one be enough to end SoCal’s devastating fire season?

While the Palisades and Eaton fires were the most devastating blazes to ignite during January's severe fire weather, they were far from alone. The Lidia, Archer, Woodley, Sunset, Kenneth, Hurst and Auto fires collectively scorched almost 2,400 acres; all are also 100% contained. The Hughes fire ignited near Castaic Lake on Jan. 22 and quickly grew to over 10,000 acres before crews were able to reach 100% containment.

To battle the firestorm, regional fire crews were assisted by a massive outpouring of aid from fire departments across the country, as well as Mexico and Canada.

Investigations into the causes of the two largest fires are ongoing.

In the case of the Eaton fire, officials are scrutinizing a Southern California Edison electrical transmission tower where videos showed what appeared to be a fire igniting. For the Palisades fire, investigators are focusing their efforts on a popular hiking trail where they believe an old fire was reignited or a new fire sparked on Jan. 7.

Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.

This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.



Deadly Eaton and Palisades fires 100% contained after 24 days

Dennis Romero
Updated Sat, February 1, 2025 

The deadly, wind-fueled Palisades and Eaton fires, which broke out 3½ weeks ago in Southern California, were declared fully contained Friday by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.

The expansive Palisades Fire erupted the morning of Jan. 7 in Pacific Palisades, a neighborhood east of Malibu, as a brush fire and was quickly exploded in Southern California’s dry weather conditions.

Later that evening, the Eaton Fire started in Los Angeles County in the foothills of Angeles National Forest. It feasted on seven months of rain-free brush as hurricane-force winds spread it into the neighborhoods of Altadena.

A resident inspects the remains of her home in Altadena, Calif., on Jan. 9, 2025.

Containment denotes how much of a perimeter has been established around a fire to halt its growth.

At least 29 people were killed in the two fires — 17 in the Eaton Fire and 12 in the Palisades Fire, according to the Los Angeles County Medical Examiner.

The official cause of the fires is under investigation, according to Cal Fire.

The Palisades Fire covered 23,448 acres, destroyed 6,837 structures and damaged an additional 1,017, according to Cal Fire.

A firefighter extinguishes vehicles in Altadena, Calif., during the Eaton Fire on Jan. 8.

The Eaton Fire fed on a San Gabriel Valley foothills enclave nestled against the vast, mountainous Angeles National Forest as heavy winds pushed flames downhill and into the urban population.

It destroyed 9,418 structures and damaged 1,073, many of them century-old homes in Altadena, a historically inclusive community known for its Black professionals and artists. Many of the community's architectural gems, including the Andrew McNally House and the Zane Grey Estate, were destroyed, according to the Los Angeles Conservancy.

Roughly 4,000 acres of the 14,021-acre blaze covered urban and residential blocks, the operations section chief on the fire, Jed Gaines of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, said at a community meeting last week.


Residents return to their fire-damaged home after the Eaton Fire swept through Altadena on Jan. 8.



MAGA Forces Trans Soldier to Say They Weren’t Flying Doomed Black Hawk
The Daily Beast

A combination of drought-like conditions and powerful offshore winds in Southern California prompted fire weather that was, in the words of the National Weather Service, “about as bad as it gets.” The region has had less than 10% of average rainfall since Oct. 1.

The National Weather Service warned extreme fire weather was coming, using a rare term, “particularly dangerous situation,” on Jan. 6.

Gov. Gavin Newsom moved state fire personnel and equipment to Southern California as a precaution, his office said the day before the fires.

The wildfires overwhelmed most attempts to stop them, though a few others, such as the Sunset Fire in the Hollywood Hills of Los Angeles, were contained, doused and starved of fuel.

On Monday, Cal Fire Chief Joe Tyler credited the recent storm, which brought the first significant rainfall to parts of Southern California in nearly eight months, for helping firefighters working on the deadly L.A. blazes.

“Rain showers across Southern California have greatly reduced current fire potential,” he said on X.

DEJA VU; REAGAN'S 'STAR WARS'  REDUX

Russia condemns Trump missile defence shield plan, accuses US of plotting to militarise space

Dmitry Antonov
Fri, January 31, 2025 

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia on Friday condemned an executive order by U.S. President Donald Trump to build a new missile defence shield, accusing the United States of trying to upset the global nuclear balance and pave the wave for military confrontation in space.

Trump on Monday signed an order that "mandated a process to develop an ‘American Iron Dome,’" a next-generation U.S. missile defence shield against ballistic, hypersonic, cruise missile and other forms of aerial attack.

The White House said the intention was to modernise an outdated system and address a "catastrophic threat" that had become more complex as U.S. adversaries developed new delivery systems.

But Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said the plan was aimed at undermining the ability of both Russia and China to exercise nuclear deterrence.

In the sharpest Russian criticism so far of a policy announced by Trump's new administration, she said that the planned U.S. move would hinder the prospects for talks on nuclear arms control - something that both Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin have said they favour.

"It (the plan) directly envisages a significant strengthening of the American nuclear arsenal and means for conducting combat operations in space, including the development and deployment of space-based interception systems," Zakharova told reporters at a news briefing in Moscow.

"We consider this as another confirmation of the U.S. focus on turning space into an arena of armed confrontation... and the deployment of weapons there.

"The indicated U.S. approaches will not contribute to reducing tensions or improving the situation in the strategic sphere, including creating a basis for a fruitful dialogue on strategic offensive arms," she said.

The White House's Iron Dome statement did not refer to strengthening the U.S. nuclear arsenal, but said:

"The Iron Dome will further the goals of peace through strength. By empowering the United States with a second-strike capability, the Iron Dome will deter adversaries from attacks on the homeland."

Trump and Putin have both said they would like to meet face-to-face to discuss a range of issues, including the Ukraine war, but Moscow says it has yet to receive any signals from the U.S. on when and where such an encounter could take place.

(Reporting by Dmitry Antonov, writing by Mark Trevelyan; Editing by Andrew Osborn)



Russia slams Donald Trump's 'Iron Dome' missile defence shield in nuclear weapons space war row

Nicholas Cecil
Fri, January 31, 202

Russia slammed Donald Trump’s plan for an ‘Iron Dome’ missile defence shield in a nuclear weapons space war row.

Moscow said the move was designed to weaken Russian and Chinese nuclear deterrence.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova also stressed that Russia saw the “Iron Dome” plan as confirmation of a US intention to turn space into a theatre of military confrontation.

Trump signed an order on Monday for the implementation of a next-generation US missile defence shield against ballistic, hypersonic, cruise missile and other forms of aerial attack.

The plan is believed to be modelled on the defensive dome used by Israel, which successfully defeated an attack by Iran last year.
ADVERTISEMENT


In the executive order, Trump stressed: “The threat of attack by ballistic, hypersonic, and cruise missiles, and other advanced aerial attacks, remains the most catastrophic threat facing the United States.”

Vladimir Putin, who is yet to hold talks with Trump, has signalled that he is ready to discuss nuclear arms controls.

The Russian president has made nuclear threats over the Ukraine war as the West has increasingly ratcheted up support for Kyiv.

After ballistic missiles supplied by the US and Britain were fired by Ukraine at targets inside Russia, Putin hit back attacking the Ukrainian city of Dnipro with a “new conventional intermediate range” missile codenamed Oreshnik.

The missile flew for 15 minutes and reached a maximum speed of beyond Mach 11, said spy chiefs in Kyiv.

Mach 11 is eleven times the speed of sound.

The West is building up its military forces in the face of the growing threat from Putin’s Russia, and the expansionist foreign policy of China’s Xi Jinping.

Earlier this week, two Russian nuclear deterrent bomber planes flew over the Sea of Japan.

The Ukraine war has seen the rapid development of drone warfare, and also Russia increasingly resorting to “grey zone” acts of aggression.

They include damaging critical underwater cables in the Baltic Sea, according to the West.

Britain has warned that Russian “shadow fleet” ships that seek to do the same in British waters face being raided by Royal Marine commandos.

Defence Secretary John Healey told earlier this month how he ordered a Royal Navy submarine to surface close to a suspected Russian spy ship, the Yantar, which was loitering over undersea infrastructure in British waters.

Trump is also piling pressure on Nato allies in Europe to boost defence spending so they take on greater responsibility for protecting the Continent, rather than relying so heavily on American might.

Sir Keir Starmer’s has pledged to increase UK defence spending to 2.5 per cent but has not yet set a date by when this will be achieved.

Ukraine’s military said on Friday its drones hit a major oil refinery in Russia’s Volgograd region, causing explosions and a fire, in the latest of a series of attacks on fuel and power plants.

Russian troops took control of the village of Novovasylivka in Ukraine’s eastern Donetsk region, the Defence Ministry in Moscow said.


Opinion - A US Iron Dome won’t work and will weaken nuclear deterrence

Benjamin D. Giltner, opinion contributor
Fri, January 31, 2025 at 8:30 AM MST·4 min read
54




A top priority of U.S. defense officials is to protect Americans from nuclear attacks. In an attempt to accomplish this goal, President Trump issued an executive order calling for the creation of an “Iron Dome for America,” a reference to Israel’s much-vaunted missile defense system.

Secretary of Defense Hegseth hinted his desire to begin plans for this missile defense system. Some members of Congress, such as Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) are also on board with this plan.

A missile defense system to protect America from nuclear weapons sounds like a good idea. It is not. A U.S. Iron Dome would be a waste of taxpayer money and would bring the world closer to nuclear Armageddon.

If anyone should take anything away from this piece, it is that missile defenses against nuclear weapons increase the chances of them being used. This seems counterintuitive. But U.S. senior officials and policymakers must understand how the other side would perceive such a move.
ADVERTISEMENT


If the U.S. creates a missile defense system capable of shooting down incoming nuclear missiles, the Russians and Chinese would be compelled to make more nuclear weapons to counter this missile defense. Not only that, but the Russians and Chinese would see this missile defense as a possible way for the United States to launch nuclear weapons first without fear of retaliation.

The ability to retaliate makes deterrence work. Without it, a security crisis is likely to emerge.

The U.S. faced a crisis like this in 1983, when NATO forces launched war exercises. The Soviet Union came close to launching nuclear weapons out of fear that these exercises were actually a NATO attack against the Warsaw Pact. The Reagan administration’s missile defense plans earlier that year laid the groundwork for a nuclear crisis with the Soviets. It’s doubtful that anyone wants to experience a nuclear crisis in today’s fraught world.

There are also reasons to doubt that an Iron Dome for America would even work. Defense contractors and government officials say that missile defenses have a good interception rate, although they fail to publish these numbers to the public. Thankfully, organizations like the Arms Control Association and recent conflicts offer insight into the success rates of missile defenses.

The most recent test of America’s current missile defense system, the Ground-based Midcourse Defense — had “12 successful intercepts in 21 tests.” Between the end of 2008 and 2013, no GMD intercept tests succeeded. That’s not a great look for missile defense advocates.
ADVERTISEMENT


To complicate missile defenses further, both China and Russia attach multiple warheads to their missiles. Having anywhere from three to 16 nuclear warheads raining down from a single missile makes intercepting all of them impossible.

Former Secretary of Defense James Schlesinger was right when he said, “There is no realistic hope that we shall ever again be able to protect American cities. There is no leak-proof defense. Any defense is going to suffer some erosion at best.”

Current missile defenses foreshadow how costly a U.S. Iron Dome would be.

Take the Houthi attacks on American ships in the Red Sea. One missile interceptor aboard a U.S. ship costs around $2 million while a single Houthi drone amounted to around $2,000. This case shows that missiles have an economic advantage over missile defenses.

Over the past few decades, the U.S. has spent $400 billion of taxpayer money on missile defense programs. And as noted earlier, these missile defenses aren’t very successful at destroying incoming missiles. Creating an Iron Dome for America would cost around $2.5 trillion of American taxpayer money.
ADVERTISEMENT


Moreover, missile defenses against nuclear weapons are like a snake eating its tail. If the United States builds an Iron Dome, Russia and China will increase their nuclear weapon stockpiles and capabilities, forcing the United States to increase its missile interceptors, then leading Russia and China to increase their nuclear weapon stockpiles and capabilities, and on and on it goes.

This was why the Nixon administration agreed to the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in 1972. Unlike 1972, America has two nuclear peers, making this tit-for-tat problem more profound than during the Cold War. If the Trump administration wants to cut U.S. government spending, it should avoid creating this missile defense system.

The world is closer to catastrophe than it ever has been. Creating an Iron Dome for America would not just be a poor decision — it would be a monumental failure in defense policy.

President Trump should reconsider this missile defense proposal. The fate of human civilization rests upon this decision.

Benjamin D. Giltner is a Washington D.C.-based defense and foreign policy analyst.
ADVERTISEMENT


Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to The Hill.
View comments (53)






Terms/Privacy Policy
Privacy Dashboard
About Our Ads


Up next





Trump wants an ‘Iron Dome’ over the US. But even a mini version in the Pacific is taking a while
Analysis by Brad Lendon, CNN
Fri, January 31, 2025 at 6:35 PM MST·7 min read
59



President Donald Trump has called for an expansive, next-generation missile defense shield for the mainland United States, something modeled on Israel’s formidable defenses, typified by its signature Iron Dome system.

A defensive dome for the US – a country hundreds of times the size of Israel – would require massive scale, as well as space-based interceptors, and almost certainly be decades away.

Yet on the piece of US soil perhaps most vulnerable to missile attacks – the Pacific island of Guam – work is well underway on the kind of multi-layered missile defense that could point the way.

However, experts say even that faces steep challenges.
ADVERTISEMENT


“There are no fast or panacea solutions, and we are making the decisions late in the game even though visionary military and political leaders saw this coming in the 1990s,” said Carl Schuster, a former director of operations at the US Pacific Command’s Joint Intelligence Center.
Guam’s early success

The US territory of Guam, a 210-square-mile island in the Pacific Ocean, is home to just under 175,000 people. It also hosts Andersen Air Force Base – a key deployment base for US Air Force bombers such as the B-1 and B-52 and sometimes the stealthy B-2 – and is homeport to US nuclear attack submarines that could be vital in any defense of Taiwan.

The island is less than 1,900 miles (3,000 kilometers) from China (PRC) and 2,100 miles from North Korea. Mockups of it have shown up in China’s military propaganda videos, and North Korea has made threats against it.

But the US military has not stood still, advancing its ability to defend against regional threats.
ADVERTISEMENT


Just last December, the US Missile Defense Agency (MDA) conducted the first successful intercept of a ballistic missile target from the island using the Aegis Guam System, which fired a land-based interceptor of the type that US Navy ships have used to destroy ballistic missile targets in testing.

“Current forces are capable of defending Guam against today’s North Korean ballistic missile threats. However, the regional threat to Guam, including those from PRC, continues to rapidly evolve,” the MDA’s director for operations, Michelle Atkinson, said in 2023.

In the December test, a US Air Force C-17 plane released a medium-range ballistic missile target off Guam’s coast. After the target was tracked by powerful radar, an interceptor was fired from a Vertical Launch System on the island, taking it out outside Earth’s atmosphere, according to releases by MDA and Lockheed Martin, the manufacturer of the Aegis system on Guam.

An Army Navy / Transportable Radar Surveillance and Control Series 6 (AN/TPY-6) positioned on the island of Guam was used during the December ballistic missile interception test. - US Department of Defense

It was a “a critical milestone in the defense of Guam and the region,” said US Navy Rear Adm. Greg Huffman, commander, Joint Task Force-Micronesia.
ADVERTISEMENT


But the intercept test went beyond the land-based Aegis system, with other military elements testing systems that would form key parts of the multi-layered concept Trump would like to see.

That’s something akin to what Israel fields, a four-tiered system often lumped under the “Iron Dome” moniker, after its best-known and lowest layer. While the Iron Dome combats incoming rockets and artillery weapons, David’s Sling protects against short- and medium-range threats, and the Arrow 2 and Arrow 3 systems stop ballistic missiles.

In a nod to a similarly layered defensive structure, US Indo-Pacific Command said it used December’s intercept to test tracking capabilities of the US Army’s Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system based on Guam.

THAAD is designed to stop incoming missiles in their terminal, or descent, phase of flight, while Aegis makes its intercept in the mid-course phase, outside Earth’s atmosphere, before the missiles dive on their target.

The US military also employs Patriot missile batteries, designed to make much lower-altitude intercepts, as the final phase of Guam’s defense. Both the THAAD and Patriot systems have been successfully used in combat.
ADVERTISEMENT


All three – Aegis, THAAD and Patriot – will eventually form what is called the Enhanced Integrated Air and Missile Defense System (EIAMD) on Guam, which the MDA says will provide “360-degree coverage, and layered defense against regional ballistic, maneuvering ballistic, hypersonic glide, and cruise missile threats.”

That system would also rely on input from US satellites and space-based sensors, according to the MDA, inching it closer to Trump’s missile defense vision.
Difficult challenges

But the timeline for full Guam missile defense – expected to take at least a decade to put together – is indicative of the challenges in constructing any system to fight ballistic and hypersonic glide missiles. That’s not helped by constant technological advances in missile technology, which often evolves more quickly than ways to defend against it.

And Trump’s concept of a next-generation missile defense for the continental US goes well beyond what is still years away on Guam, an island about 10 times the size of Manhattan.

In his executive order, Trump said he would “direct (the US) military to begin construction of the great Iron Dome missile defense shield, which will be made all in the USA,” as the US faces a “catastrophic threat” from ballistic, cruise and hypersonic missiles.

His ambitious executive order called for an acceleration in “the development and deployment of Hypersonic and Ballistic Tracking Space Sensor Layers, proliferated space-based interceptors, a Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture, capabilities to defeat salvoes prior to launch, non-kinetic missile defense capabilities, and underlayer and terminal-phase intercept capabilities.”

Trump’s order does not give any estimate of the costs of such a system, but several hundreds of billions of dollars would probably be a conservative estimate.

“The costs of reliably defending an area the size of the United States against a wide variety of threats at multiple different intercept points would be astronomical,” said Matt Korda, associate director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists.

And as far as money goes, the advantage goes to the attacker.

“Offense is cheaper than defense every single time,” Korda said.

Even if US technology can develop and deploy all that Trump is asking for, impregnable missile defense could still prove impossible.

Though it is touted by many as the world’s best missile defense, attacks by Iran last year showed that the Iron Done is far from unbeatable, with projectiles fired by Tehran and Houthi rebels landing in Israel.

Iran achieved that by firing large numbers of weapons at Israel. While many of the around 180 missiles launched were intercepted, some got through. Missile defense experts have long pointed out that’s one way to beat any missile defense system.

Schuster, a former US Navy captain who worked on the Aegis missile defense system in its early days, said missile defenses can be “saturated,” pointing out that the incoming ballistic missile knows where it’s going, but the interceptors have to be directed to their target.

“You can only guide so many (interceptors) at any one time while the ballistic missile has an internal guidance system,” Schuster said.

The problem for defenders becomes more difficult once warheads with “maneuverable reentry vehicles” – which can change directions after they reenter the atmosphere and approach targets from different directions – are added. Both China and Russia have such capabilities.

“A target coming directly at you is the easiest to intercept. The greater the lateral displacement from that, the more challenging the intercept equation,” Schuster said.

Adversaries can compound that problem by firing decoy missiles, which distract from more important targets – which if they involve nuclear warheads, could do catastrophic damage.
The long road ahead

Of course, all that comes into play once a system is actually deployed.

And, according to Schuster, the biggest stumbling block for Trump’s shield plan could be a US production and procurement system that has been neglected – despite the early successes demonstrated on Guam.

“Our production rates are criminally low in my opinion,” he said. “We have been asleep at the switch … for over a decade.”

And it’s not just a manufacturing infrastructure problem, it’s also the limited knowledge and skills to produce them, Schuster said.

“We are going to have to invest in both plant, which we do well, and people, which we don’t do well.”

For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com

Saturday, February 01, 2025

US aid was long a lifeline for Eastern Europe. Trump cuts are sending shockwaves through the region

STEPHEN McGRATH and AUREL OBREJA
Thu, January 30, 2025














Moldova EU Europe US Aid
FILE - United States Secretary of State Antony Blinken walks during a visit to the site of Moldelectrica Chisinau Substation in Braila, a USAID supported project, south of the capital of Moldova, Wednesday, May 29, 2024
. (AP Photo/Vadim Ghirda, File)

CHISINAU, Moldova (AP) — President Donald Trump’s abrupt freeze of U.S. foreign aid is sending shockwaves through Eastern Europe, leaving pro-democracy groups, independent media, civil society initiatives and local governments scrambling to make ends meet in a region often defined by rivalries between East and West.

The U.S. State Department said that the 90-day freeze aims to root out waste and block so-called woke programs to expose U.S.-funded activities “that run contrary to our national interests” — as Trump aggressively rolls out his “America First” agenda.

Fears of a rise in influence from Russia and China

Eastern Europe has been a longtime geopolitical battleground where Western foreign policy interests often collide with those of Moscow or Beijing.

Many fear the cessation of U.S. funds could expose Washington's allies — and create a vacuum that its foes could gladly seek to fill.

“In Moldova’s case, foreign donor support is vital to balancing the media landscape," says Oxana Greadcenco, the director of independent media platform Moldova.org. “Many television networks and media institutions are funded by Russia so there needs to be a counterbalance ... This is an unprecedented situation, but we are trying not to panic.”

The U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID, informed her that grants officially ended on Jan. 24 and they aren’t allowed to spend any remaining funds in their accounts. This week, Greadcenco promoted their online Patreon campaign, which garnered 135 new backers in two days, which should cover salaries for the platform’s 16-strong staff through March, she said.

“We did not expect it to impact Moldova so severely, as we thought there would only be a partial cut in funds,” she told The Associated Press. "Being aware of how much Moldova depends on U.S. funds, not just NGOs and the press but also local municipalities, many public institutions … this is a shock for everyone."

Vital aid for former communist countries


Since the 1990s, USAID has invested several billion dollars in countries like Moldova, Serbia, Albania, Kosovo, and Bosnia and Herzegovina — all former communist countries with aspirations of joining the European Union.

In these countries, USAID money has promoted democratic institutions and reforms, aided infrastructure and energy security projects, bolstered businesses and economies, and supported a significant number of nongovernmental organizations and independent media platforms. The agency says it “tailors its approach to each country’s unique challenges and opportunities.”

“It’s no exaggeration to say that we have democracy in Moldova, in part thanks to American financial support,” Valeriu Pasa, the chairman of the Chisinau-based think-tank WatchDog, said in a statement on Wednesday. He added that the U.S. benefits "from us being more democratic and developed, ensuring we don’t turn into a Russian or Chinese colony.”

The wide-ranging effects of the USAID spending freeze spanning different sectors highlight how critical the funds are to the region.

Sytrime Dervisholi, executive director of the Prefabricated Construction Association of Kosovo, says the halted USAID funds will adversely affect her association’s ability to provide technical assistance to member companies that require vocational education and training, and access to grants.

“Kosovo, but also our association … is dependent on foreign aid, mostly on U.S. aid,” she said. “So we really do hope that this measure will be … canceled after 90 days,” when the funding reviews by U.S. officials have concluded.

Safet Gerxhaliu, an independent economic analyst in Kosovo, also believes the USAID freeze could have “a very negative impact” on the country’s future, affecting everything from the government to the private sector and education.

“I do believe that the impact is very bad, because those measures come at the same time that Kosovo is under sanctions from the European community,” he said. Brussels froze some funding to Kosovo in 2023 following a series of clashes with ethnic Serb minorities.

Although Serbia obtained EU candidate status in 2012, the Balkan nation is also a key ally of Russia and China in Europe. Under the government of populist President Aleksandar Vucic, reforms in areas such as strengthening the rule of law and tackling corruption have been slow, and the USAID suspension could further hamper progress.

“We currently have a USAID project about public financing. Training for local NGOs regarding following of public finances,” Nemanja Nenadic from Transparency International organization in Serbia, told the AP. “This has been put on hold.”

US funds help monitor elections


For the Promo-LEX Association, a longtime pro-democracy and human rights NGO in Moldova, USAID funds are vital since they account for about 75-80% of its projects, which include monitoring elections, political financing and parliamentary oversight.

“All USAID-funded activities have been put on hold. Without immediate alternative support, these crucial activities may not continue at the same scale or effectiveness,” said Ion Manole, the association’s executive director. “Given previous Russian interference — through illicit campaign funding, political corruption, and disinformation — our observation mission is essential to ensuring electoral transparency."

Moldova will hold a pivotal parliamentary election this fall which comes after the pro-Western government accused Russia of meddling in two key votes last year — including backing a vast vote-buying scheme in the country of about 2.5 million people.

“Without resources, we cannot deploy long-term observers, conduct election-day monitoring, or track foreign interference effectively," Manole said. “A change to an anti-Western government could affect Moldova’s European path and ... significantly destabilize the whole of Eastern Europe and the Black Sea region.”

“We remain hopeful that the U.S. government’s evaluation process will allow programs like ours to resume,” he said, adding that his NGO is already seeking alternative funding, mainly from European donors.

A geopolitical opportunity for Moscow


Cristian Cantir, a Moldovan associate professor of international relations at Oakland University, told the AP that any suspension of aid “gives Russia an unnecessary opportunity to exploit and benefit further from Moldova’s weaknesses, which the lack of USAID funding would exacerbate.”

“Moscow would therefore have greater abilities to derail Chisinau from its European Union integration course,” he said. “Similarly, cutting funding to independent news outlets makes it more difficult for journalists to hold corrupt politicians — many of whom have connections to Russia — accountable and therefore weakens Moldova’s sovereignty and institutional independence.”

The Trump administration has cast the aid freeze as an accountability quest to justify American spending abroad. Beyond support for Ukraine in recent years, the U.S. is spending about $40 billion in foreign aid annually, according to the U.S. State Department.

Greadcenco of the Moldova.org news platform hopes that other international partners will consider stepping in to stem a potential longer-term shortfall.

“These funds are vital to keeping Moldova afloat,” she said. “I dread to think what the complete cessation of these funds would mean for our country.”

___

Stephen McGrath reported from Sighisoara, Romania. Jovana Gec in Belgrade, Serbia, Llazar Semini in Tirana, Albania, and Florent Bajrami in Pristina, Kosovo, contributed to this report.
Colombia's president calls for migrants to leave jobs in the US and return home

FOR JOBS IN THE COCA FIELDS

Associated Press
Fri, January 31, 2025

FILE - Colombia's President Gustavo Petro arrives at the opening ceremony of COP16, a United Nations' biodiversity conference, in Cali, Colombia, Oct. 20, 2024. (AP Photo/Fernando Vergara, file)

BOGOTA, Colombia (AP) — Colombia's president is calling on his compatriots working without legal status in the United States to leave their jobs and return home as soon as possible.

“Wealth is only produced by the working people,” Gustavo Petro said in an early morning post on the X platform. “Let's build social wealth in Colombia."

The leftist president said his government would provide loans to those who take up his offer to return home and enlist in one of its programs to start a business.

Petro made his comments following a bitter feud over immigration last weekend with U.S. President Donald Trump that nearly triggered a trade war and rupture in diplomatic relations between the U.S. and its historic ally in South America.
ADVERTISEMENT


Petro, in an earlier social media storm, accused the Trump administration of mistreating migrants who entered the U.S. illegally by handcuffing them and removing them on military flights to Latin America. Trump exploded when Petro denied two such flights permission to land.

Later, the two sides negotiated a truce amid protests by investors that Petro was sabotaging Colombia's export economy, which relies heavily on purchases from the U.S.

Colombia accepted 475 deportation flights from the U.S. from 2020 to 2024, fifth behind Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico and El Salvador, according to Witness at the Border, an advocacy group that tracks flight data. It accepted 124 deportation flights in 2024.

Colombian president urges undocumented Colombians in US to return

Filip Timotija
Fri, January 31, 2025



Colombian President Gustavo Petro urged undocumented Colombians who are living in the U.S. to return home, saying they would be rewarded for it.

“I ask undocumented Colombians in the U.S. to immediately leave their jobs in that country and return to Colombia as soon as possible,” Petro said in a Friday morning post on social platform X.

“Wealth is produced only by working people,” he added.

Petro said the Colombian Department of Social Prosperity will look to give out loans to those returnees who enroll in the program.

“Let’s build social wealth in Colombia,” he wrote.

The president and his government were engaged in a heated back-and-forth tussle last weekend over immigration and trade.

Petro initially said that U.S. planes carrying Colombian migrants would not be able to land in the country.

President Trump retaliated by threatening to impose a 25 percent tariff on Colombian goods coming into the country while also banning government officials and their family members from being able to travel to the U.S.

Similarly, Petro said Colombia would be instating a 25 percent tariff on goods.

The situation was tentatively resolved Sunday night, when White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed in a statement that the two sides agreed and that Colombia will accept “all illegal aliens from Colombia returned from the United States, including on U.S. military aircraft, without limitation or delay.”

Since then, Colombian planes have been arriving in Bogotá with migrants who Petro said were not “criminals.”

“Our compatriots come from the United States free, dignified, without being handcuffed. We structure a productive, associative and cheap credit plan for migrants,” he said.

Earlier this week, the U.S. Embassy in Bogotá shut down visa appointments for Colombians seeking entry to America over the “Colombian government’s refusal to accept repatriation flights of Colombian nationals.”

Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.