Saturday, February 15, 2025

UK

Why are so many more people claiming out of work benefits?

 

FEBRUARY 12, 2025

By Merry Cross

Disability activists Ellen Clifford has won a case against the Department of Work and Pensions in the High Court. The judge declared unlawful a rushed consultation about reducing benefits for disabled and ill people. One reason for the judge’s decision (though there were several) was that the rationale purported to be about getting more people into work, whereas in fact the primary purpose was to cut back welfare spending. Yet within days of this win, the current Government declared their intention to stick to these spending cuts and the media had no apparent interest in why it was all happening.

One of the many things about the mass media that is hugely irritating is their thoughtless parroting of the figures on welfare benefits. ‘The cost has grown too much because far too many people are claiming for disability and sickness and we need to reduce the amount we’re spending on it.’

Can we please consider the context for the rise in claims for Personal Independence Payments and incapacity benefits since 2018/19? Simply stating the problem as it stands without doing so, allows us to point the finger at the recipients or applicants for the rise, and that is victim-blaming, pure and simple.

The dates quoted should ring a pandemic bell for most people. We know that the previous Government under Boris Johnson handled the pandemic disastrously badly. School closures also caused many children to feel isolated and damaged their mental health, their education and attainments. The Government delayed imposing a lockdown; they paid millions for useless Personal Protective Equipment; they sent pensioners who had contracted Covid in hospital back into nursing homes, causing many more to catch and die from Covid; many doctors, nursing and care staff contracted it unnecessarily and many were left with Long Covid. 

The Office for National Statistics estimated that in 2024 there were about 2 million people with Long Covid. Some of the symptoms of Long Covid are now thought by scientists to resemble or be linked to Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) also called CFS or Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (National Institutes of Health report, 2023). 4.5% Covid 19 sufferers met ME/CFS criteria compared to 0.6% who had not had Covid.

Now factor in the anxiety thousands of us suffer as we become more and more aware of being on the brink of climate disaster, with the 1.5% increase in temperature linked to a tipping point in the planet’s ability to adapt already breached. In this age of access to multiple media outlets, it is almost impossible to be ignorant of the lives, homes and livelihoods lost to floods, storms and wildfires all around the world.

How about the impact on our mental health of the threat of homelessness which rose exponentially under the last Government? Every single family that rents their home must have been worried by this and every single person, particularly the children,  made homeless will have suffered massively from the disruption to their social lives, their education and of course their sense of security.

The rise in hate crime against Muslims and Jews was 25% in 2024 according to Government statistics, and trans people are also being targeted. It must be taking its toll on the mental health of these groups, as is the paucity of health services for trans adults and youngsters. Some trans people have left work because of the strength of the discrimination they face there.

Is all this enough to justify the rise in those with anxiety and other mental health issues? What about the fact that jobs are not easy to find (and will only get more scarce with the increased use of AI, so favoured by Sir Keir Starmer) even if you are in the best of health; or the fact that university qualifications don’t necessarily lead to any job despite students having many thousands of pounds of debt? It makes a fiction out of the Government’s claims that cutting access to benefits will get more people into work. In fact the current system is quite cruel enough, with assessments, sanctions and mistakes by the Department for Work and Pensions costing too many people their physical or mental health and even their lives see The Department by John Pring 2024).

And which age-group within society is most likely to have mental distress? It’s teenagers of course, the group that this and the last Government most complain about for being out of work. Yet the funding and resources for mental health services have been savaged over recent years, with a report by the Children’s Commissioner in March 2024 stating that almost a quarter of a million children who had been referred for treatment in 2023 were still waiting.

So let us stop blaming individuals for claiming welfare payments and seek solutions to at least some of these potent and destructive factors in the rise of the numbers of claimants. We must therefore welcome the forthcoming legislation to prevent the use of no-blame evictions.

First of all, the Government could alleviate the financial pressure on themselves and all of us by taxing large corporations and the super-rich proportionately. Second, it could start legal proceedings (if it hasn’t done so already) to recoup funds lost to payments for useless Personal Protective Equipment. Third ,the Treasury could dramatically increase funding and resources for mental health services. Fourth, the Government could support much greater efforts to replace plastics with non-toxic, biodegradable products.

Perhaps most important of all it could stop pandering to the fossil fuel industry and help us all feel there might be hope for the future.

All of this is to say that pointing the finger at sick and disabled people and pushing them even further into poverty is not only immoral – it would likely backfire and cause even more ill health.

Merry Cross has been a disability activist for fifty years and was among the first members of Disabled People Against Cuts, of which she also chaired a local branch for ten years.

Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/europealacarte/8449673837.  Licence: Attribution-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic (CC BY-ND 2.0)

UK

Cleaners at the Old Bailey ballot to strike against outsourcing plans

FEBRUARY 11,2025

The Cleaners and Allied Independent Workers Union (CAIWU) is launching a strike ballot in response to the City of London Corporation’s plans to outsource cleaning staff at the Old Bailey (Central Criminal Court). This decision represents a significant betrayal of public sector workers, undermining the very promises of insourcing made by the Labour government.

CAIWU condemns this move as a direct attack on the rights and livelihoods of some of the most vulnerable workers in society. Outsourcing is widely recognised for driving down wages, increasing workloads, and stripping away essential workplace protections. Instead of fulfilling the government’s pledge to insource public sector roles, this decision reinforces the creation of a two-tier workforce— one in which contracted workers face insecurity, alienation, and a lack of in-work benefits compared to their directly employed counterparts.

“Our members at the Old Bailey have been left in the dark, with no consultation on this drastic change,” said a CAIWU spokesperson. “They now live in fear of what this outsourcing will mean for their jobs, their pay, and their working conditions. It is appalling that, under a government that promised to reverse these exploitative practices, we are still seeing public sector workers cast aside in pursuit of cost-cutting measures.”

CAIWU is calling for the City of London Corporation to halt these plans immediately and uphold fair treatment for all its employees. Ian Thomas CBE, the Town Clerk and Chief Executive of the City of London, has championed principles of equality and inclusion in his tenure. With cleaners representing some of the most diverse members of the workforce as primarily women, people of colour and migrants, now is the time to demonstrate those values in action.

If the Corporation refuses to act, CAIWU members at the Old Bailey will have no choice but to take industrial action to defend their rights.

The timeline of events is as follows:

• 22nd January 2025, Old Bailey Cleaners received a letter from OCS Commercial Cleaning Services informing them of the initiation of a TUPE Transfer to be completed by 1st March 2025.

• Cleaners were not informed or consulted about the transfer beforehand. On 22nd January, CAIWU responded raising concerns about the lack of consultation time built into the process.

• 2nd February 2025, due to lack of adequate response from the City of London Corporation, CAIWU gave notice of a strike ballot, opening on 14th February.

CAIWU was founded in 2016 and is an independent workers union designed to help organise cleaners across the UK. CAIWU is run by and for its members. CAIWU has waged several high-profile campaigns at the Royal Opera House, University of East London, Facebook, Nike Town, the British Medical Association, and the Ministry of Defence, and continues to campaign for improved pay and working conditions across its organised workplaces.

Confessions of a demoralised Labour Party member

FEBRUARY 15, 2025

By David Osland

If people freely gave up days of their time for weeks on end to leaflet and knock on doors, just to ensure my return to well-remunerated public office, I’d do my best to feign gratitude. Heck, I might even summon up the grace to say thank you.

Not so the Labour MPs and councillors who constitute the Trigger Me Timbers WhatsApp group, the rancid content of which made it into the newspapers this week.

The messages went heavy on the kind of juvenile racist, sexist and homophobic banter that I haven’t come across since I was a pupil at a 1970s grammar school. Inevitably, the targets of the uncomradely invective were colleagues, activists and constituents.

Angela Rayner was hailed as a blow job queen, because that’s all that working-class women are good for, right? Partially-sighted Battersea MP Marsha de Cordova was mocked for her disability.

We learn that Diane Abbott’s groundbreaking appearance as the first black politician to respond for the Opposition at prime minister’s questions might better have been handled by a rightwing Tory MP given to blacking up.

A gay councillor was accused of organising Town Hall orgies with “decrepit trade unionists”, because everybody knows what a promiscuous bunch that lot are. And anyone with a Jewish surname surely has to be working for Mossad.

Way to go, guys. Bernard Manning couldn’t have put it better. Women, the disabled, people of colour, LGBT people and Jews will readily get the funny ha-ha tropes. They’re a laugh a minute up there in Tameside.

The Two Minutes Hate is then refocused on activists, dismissed as “marxists loonies” (sic) and “Trots”, as if “we hate our members” were somehow optimal recruitment advertising for a political party.

And why stop there? The word up to a constituent with concerns about bin collections is “fuck you” and the hope that she gets run over by a refuse truck. A party that harbours a death wish to the electorate might as well harbour a death wish towards itself.

It would be reassuring to see this as a one-off that has been dealt with by a whiff of grapeshot in the shape of subsequent disciplinary sanctions. I only wish I could believe that.

As I have sometimes heard with my own ears, Neanderthal attitudes such as these are echoed among senior local and national Labour figures up and down the country. Theirs is a culture of organised contempt for everyone outside their circle.

The Trigger Me Timbers saga should at the very least result in a round of trigger ballots. Not that it will. It’s not as if Andrew Gwynne and Oliver Ryan voted against the two-child benefit cap, or anything really bad like that.

I am – still, just about – a member of the Labour Party, admittedly of the kind that Gwynne and Ryan detest. If I were to leave, their co-thinkers would be happy at my departure, in so far as it would be noticed it at all.

In an era when Cayman Islands-registered hedge funds with fossil fuel interests are donating millions of pounds to Labour coffers, “Marxists loonies” and Trots like me aren’t even required as a dependable subscription base.

But I’m not alone in my disillusionment, with 40,000 members quitting since the general election. Euston Station will be looking on in envy as Labour manages to achieve a departure every ten minutes.

Then we get to the polls, some of which now put Labour behind Reform UK. Its actions are disappointing not just we perpetually discontented minority nut jobs who actually join, but many voters who enthusiastically put it in office in the expectation of a qualitative break with 14 years of Tory administrations.

A government should have a cohering thread, and this one patently doesn’t. Keir Starmer is not a stupid man, but his ostensibly commonsensical lack of interest in political ideas is a drawback for a prime minister, not a virtue.

Tory chancellor Norman Lamont famously described the Major government as in office but not in power. Starmer, according to his own staffers, is not even driving the train.

They joke that his position is akin to sitting in the front seat of the Docklands Light Railway. The analogy is to a Thatcherite infrastructure project primarily designed to ferry bankers between the City and Canary Wharf, ignoring the desolate poverty on the intervening council estates.

Instead of a vision, we have an obsession with “hero voters”, as if winning over Reform UK supporters were the exclusive key to winning in 2029. To this end, videos of shackled deportees are promulgated for the light entertainment of malignant racists.

The two-child benefit cap has been resolutely maintained, winter fuel payments have been axed, there are repeated rhetorical sallies on sickness and disability benefit claimants. All in the name of hard choices.

A third runway is to be built at Heathrow. Employment rights legislation looks likely to be watered down, even as Reeves backtracks on the much-trumpeted clampdown on non-doms.

As with previous Labour governments, subservience to US foreign policy remains a besetting vice. The world has been shocked by untrammelled slaughter in Gaza. But Britain’s Labour government palpably hasn’t been.

Underlying all of this is Peter Mandelson’s fatuous assertion that Labour voters have “nowhere else to go”. The dictum was debatable when first advanced; it certainly isn’t true now.

The problem with pushing a platform morally abhorrent to millions of Labour’s natural supporters is that they now have an extensive range of alternatives.

Independent candidates have a proven capacity to win seats. Meanwhile, the Green Party is presenting to the left of Labour, at least in urban areas, and even the Lib Dems are opportunistically appealing to the more radical elements in their tradition.

This year marks the 125th anniversary of the launch of the Labour Representation Committee. The risk right now is that the endeavour of a century and a quarter could find itself bankrupt in two ways, gradually then suddenly.

Next time round, a majority of 174 – give or take those without the whip at any given point – might not prove as commanding as it now looks.

Naturally, I don’t suppose anybody in the Labour leadership is going to read this article. But if by any chance they do, maybe they could discuss the salient points in their WhatsApp group.

David Osland is (still) a member of Hackney North & Stoke Newington CLP and a long-time leftwing journalist and author. Follow him on Twitter at @David__Osland

Image: Rachel Reeves and Keir Starmer. Source: UK Parliament. Author: © UK Parliament / Maria Unger,  licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.


Labour LGB: Affiliate stung by second splinter group over trans rights


© Ink Drop/Shutterstock.com

A new campaign group for gay and bisexual rights but not transgender rights has been formed in the Labour Party.

Labour LGB aims to “defend and enhance the rights of LGB people” whilst also calling for protections for single-sex spaces and “supporting the principles that same-sex attraction is real and that biology matters”.

It comes as another rival group to LGBT+ Labour, Pride in Labour, held its first annual general meeting last weekend and called on the party to deliver on its manifesto commitment to implement meaningful reform to the Gender Recognition Act.

Dee McCullough, a spokesperson for Labour LGB, said: “We are a coalition of proud Labour Party LGB members.

“The last Labour government delivered a raft of landmark reforms that we celebrate. Civil partnerships, equal age of consent, equal employment rights, adoption law reform and abolishing Section 28 to name a few. In the years ahead, we need to be vigilant in maintaining these rights. We must defend the Equality Act which spelled out that sexual orientation is a protected characteristic.

“We want to ensure that the Labour government continues to accept that same-sex attraction is real and that biology matters. These principles must be embedded in legislative proposals and in government policy.

“We would encourage Labour Party LGB members to join Labour LGB. In the ongoing debate about LGB rights within the party, the voices of LGB people must be heard in branches, CLPs, at party conference and in Parliament. The campaign for equality never ends.”

READ MORE: Torfaen by-election: Could Reform win first Welsh council seat off Labour?

The move comes amid claims that the government is shelving a manifesto commitment to make it easier for people to legally change their gender, with a party source telling The Guardian that changes may not be brought forward before the next general election.

The Prime Minister’s spokesperson told reporters the government “stands by our commitment to modernise gender recognition rules as set out in the manifesto and we’ll set out our next steps on this work in due course.”

‘No LGB without the T’, says rival LGBT+ group

Some LGBTQ+ groups within the party have spoken out over the formation of Labour LGB, claiming it aims to “divide the LGBT+ community” within the party.

Alex Charilaou, co-chair of Labour for Trans Rights, said: “The values of the labour movement are those of equality, social justice and solidarity. This new group’s plans to divide the LGBT+ community in Labour will not work.

“Trans people are at the frontline of a wider reactionary culture war. Gay, lesbian, bi and other LGBT+ people recognise that their rights are just as under threat from growing far-right attacks as the trans community.

“We hope LGBT+ Labour will disavow this group as antithetical to the aims of the LGBT+ rights movement and the Labour Party.”

Co-chair of the Pride for Labour group Jamie Strudwick called on the Labour leadership to “act immediately to protect trans people before we go past the point of no return”.

“Pride in Labour exists to champion LGBTQIA+ rights within the Labour Party. We are utterly appalled that a new splinter group, Labour LGB, is seeking to capitalise on the vile transphobia which is so deeply embedded within our society.

“We will always be extremely clear on this ‒ there is no LGB without the T.

“We are at an extremely dangerous crossroads where trans people and their right to exist is being brought into question, and we cannot allow this sickening cycle to continue.

“Be under no illusion ‒ the vast majority of gay, lesbian and bisexual people stand firmly with trans people, because they have always been, and always will be part of our family.”

In response, McCullough said: “We are proud to be Labour and proud to be LGB. Our aim is to represent people who are same-sex attracted.”

A spokesperson for Labour Women’s Declaration backed the new group and said: Why is it ok for trans organisations to organise separately, covering one of the Equality Act’s protected characteristics, but not for lesbian, gay and bisexuals to organise separately? They cover an entirely different protected characteristic, that of same-sex sexual attraction.

“Labour LGB is not objecting to the existence of groups which just focus on transgender rights.”

LGBT+ Labour gave no comment when approached by LabourList.

























Trade union women’s conference is united on trans+ rights

The right wing Daily Telegraph newspaper tried to undermine support for the motion before the conference began


Voting at the conference (Picture: unison.org.uk)


By Judy Cox
Friday 14 February 2025
SOCIALIST WORKER Issue

The women’s conference of a major trade union has voted to defend the rights of trans+ people.

The Unison women’s conference voted for a motion that states that “trans women are women and trans men are men”.

The motion argues that “trans equality is a trade union issue” and that “women’s rights are not diminished by trans people having more rights”.

The Daily Telegraph tried to undermine support for the motion before the conference began. The newspaper quoted union members saying that the motion was a threat to women’s rights.

The motion was proposed by the Camden branch of Unison. Branch secretary Liz Wheatley told Socialist Worker, “There was no one who wanted to speak against the motion. And only one vote against it out of hundreds of delegates.

“We voted to send this motion to the women’s conference because we think that trans rights are such an important issue.

“This is the sharp end of right wing politics and campaigners who are trying to attack all our rights.

“They want to turn back the clock to a time before civil rights, women’s liberation, before the Stonewall riots. They want to pit us against each other. LGBT+ people and women all need more rights, and we need to stand together and fight together for our rights.


How socialists won unions to fighting for abortion rights

“Our branch submitted the motion, but there were delegates from branches all over the country who were ready to speak in support of the motion.”

She added, “We were a bit startled to be attacked in The Telegraph. But it is not that surprising. Lots of right-wing newspapers are joining in the attacks on diversity and equality.

“And whatever The Telegraph thinks, we are very proud we proposed this motion and that it was passed.”





























UK

‘Trump’s presidency is a brutal application of raw political power – but one we have to engage with’




No one can say they weren’t warned. Yet even seasoned politicos in Washington DC have been left stunned by the first weeks of the Trump Presidency and its brutal application of raw political power.

It was Steve Bannon, the alt-right cheerleader and chief of staff in Trump’s first administration, who articulated a plan for an incoming administration to “flood the zone” with initiatives and announcements to destabilise and confuse opponents, particularly the media.

“Every day we hit them with three things, they’ll bite on one, and we’ll get all of our stuff done,” he said.

Trump’s blitzkrieg of executive orders on everything from tariffs to drinking straws, the Muskian assault on federal staff and agencies, and a range of threats against overseas allies – not to mention firing the first shots in a series of trade wars and seeking illegally to empty Gaza of two million Palestinians – means the zone is completely submerged.

The sheer force of Trump’s return to the White House has sent many of the normal political checks and balances flying. Republican senators – many cowed by the MAGA machine – have surrendered their constitutional duties to wave through inappropriate, unqualified and, in some cases, downright dangerous nominees to senior administration positions.

The Trump project

Democrat lawmakers, still in soul-searching mode trying to figure out why they lost in November, are struggling to muster any meaningful political opposition, and there are no popular protests or street demonstrations. The media, as Bannon correctly predicted, is struggling to keep pace with the deluge of noise and action emanating from an administration intent on intimidating actors at home and abroad.

The only meaningful resistance to this democratic revolution in America is in the courts. Judges have, so far, thwarted Elon Musk’s “buyout” plan offering two million federal government employees nine days to resign, stopped the transfer of trans female prisoners to male prisons, paused the dismissal of thousands of USAID staff, and ruled that his executive order ending birthright citizenship is unconstitutional.

Many more legal challenges to Trump’s actions are in the pipeline, but the administration appears to be relishing a wider fight between the elected Presidency and unelected judges. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” was the Vice President JD Vance’s chilling warning on X last weekend.

READ MORE: ‘Starmer must learn from Trump: Act fast, prioritise visible change, and keep showing voters you’re on their side’

There is confidence, too, that the conservative-majority Supreme Court will embrace the legal notion of “unitary executive theory” to rebalance constitutional power in the President’s favour if and when some of these cases are heard there.

This is why the conservative Right in the US sees this as a unique moment that can begin to reshape the country for generations to come. In the words of the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, the plan is to reverse “the long march of cultural Marxism through our institutions” and to “restore our Republic to its original moorings”.

For those that haven’t been paying attention, Project 2025 set out sweeping changes to the federal government “behemoth” that had been “weaponized against American citizens and conservative values. The solution, it said, was “not to tinker with this or that government program, to replace this or that bureaucrat. These are problems not of technocratic efficiency but of national sovereignty and constitutional governance. We solve them not by trimming and reshaping the leaves but by ripping out the trees – root and branch.”

During the election campaign, Trump publicly distanced himself from the right-wing think tank’s 900-page document, first published in 2023. But many of its contributors – including Russell Vought, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, Tom Homan, Trump’s “border czar”, and immigration hardliner Stephen Miller – are now senior members of the President’s inner circle.

And an analysis by Politico demonstrates how influential Project 2025 has already been on shaping early executive orders issued on social issues, immigration, government staffing, energy, foreign affairs and the economy.

A new form of politics

Perhaps the biggest threat to this long-term ideological project is Trump himself, given that he can only serve four more years. Will his priority be to establish secure foundations for a generational cultural revolution as many around him dream of or will it be to use this crowning period to pursue his own personal interests and legacy?

His refusal to endorse Vance as his successor in the last few days appeared to suggest the latter.

There are wider tensions, too, within Team Trump that will emerge over time – between the libertarians and the nativists, between the market enthusiasts and protectionists, between big tech and the anti-corporates, between the isolationists and foreign policy hawks. For now, though, all these interests are aligned around the elected monarch.

Into this swirling maelstrom has entered the UK’s new ambassador, Peter (Lord) Mandelson, a politician never one to duck a challenge but whose role in turning around the Labour Party in the 1980s pales in comparison to his task ahead to secure British interests in today’s US.

For more from LabourList, subscribe to our daily newsletter roundup of all things Labour – and follow us on  BlueskyWhatsAppThreadsX or Facebook .

Few understand political power and its deployment more than the former EU trade commissioner and he will instinctively understand the way the Trump operation works. Yes, his appointment carries risk – controversy has never been too far from Mandelson  – but, as our new man in DC completes his first full week in Massachusetts Avenue, he knows that winning influence in this White House would represent the pinnacle of his long and varied career.

Like them or not, many of Trump’s decisions over the next four years are likely to have a significant impact on the UK, on our politics, our prosperity and our security. Mandelson and Keir Starmer know that getting close and personal, and thinking big on the issues that matter, will be essential to gain diplomatic impact. We must hope they can.

It is clear now that we in the West are living through the beginning of a major change in international order with the world’s greatest military and economic power turning away from the collective rules and norms that have been in place for decades.

Trump is both a product and cause of a new form of democratic politics that elevates emotion over logic, noise over reason and power over justice. It represents a dire threat not just to progressive politics but to mainstream democratic politics too. How we understand it, deal with it and, where necessary, challenge it will be a defining cause.






‘Labour must redefine what good growth looks like for ordinary people’


Photo: Shutterstock

Today, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) published the latest GDP statistics for the final quarter of 2024, showing 0.1% growth in the UK economy.

While some in Government may be sighing a breath of relief after fearing a 0.1% decline, the figures are still sluggish for a government that has bet the house on delivering growth.

This should serve as a wake-up call for Labour: now is the time to redefine what good growth looks like. For years, political leaders have assumed that if GDP ticks upwards, voters will feel the benefits. But public trust in that equation has been shattered. Our findings at the Good Growth Foundation show 46% of Britons worry that growth could widen the gap between rich and poor – rising to 52% of Labour voters.

From the financial crash to Brexit, Covid to the cost of living crisis, people feel they have watched growth happen without them. They see industries like tech and finance boom while their own wages stagnate, public services decline, and work becomes increasingly insecure. Growth, to many, translates to the rich getting richer while everyone else gets left behind.

The Good Growth Foundation calls this disconnect “the growth gap.” It is the difference between how politicians measure economic success and how people experience it. The only way to bridge it is to deliver growth in the areas that actually improve lives. Voters are telling us they want to see a better NHS to create a healthier workforce, improved local transport to increase productivity and more skills and training to expand their job prospects.

Labour must focus on the cost of living crisis

This can be done. Spain has managed to outperform every other European country in terms of growth and decreased unemployment, while increasing the minimum wage, improving workers rights, investing in green energy and subsidising fuel.

Labour has rightly taken much from this approach with the Employment Rights Bill and raising the minimum wage. However, what we need to see now is a laser focus on voters’ main concern: the cost of living crisis.

The cost of living is the dominant lens through which the public views the economy. Our research found nearly two-thirds of Britons see the cost of living as one of the biggest causes of low growth, and lowering it is seen as the most convincing reason to grow.

READ MORE: ‘If we ducked tough choices for growth, Britain’s spiral of decline would continue’

Rachel Reeves has indeed course-corrected in this area, noting in her speech earlier this month that “growth isn’t simply about lines on a graph, it’s about the pounds in people’s pockets”. This is exactly what the public has been telling us. But, in her hour-long speech, Reeves only mentioned the cost of living twice. The reality is, that the crisis really is the be all and end all – hammering voters pockets across the country.

Voters want to know how their living standards and public services will improve soon

To win on the economy, the Government must spell out how big projects, like Heathrow expansion and 1.5 million new homes, will improve living standards across the UK. They have sent the right signals to investors and will pay dividends in the long term. But voters are impatient for change and want to know how their living standards and public services will improve soon.

The Good Growth Foundation’s research shows that people want an active government that backs ordinary people to pursue opportunity. They see this as the route to bringing down the cost of living so they have more money to spend and save, opening up skills and training so they can get a better job and improving healthcare so that they can work and build a better future.

READ MORE: ‘The PM’s tech-led growth plan is vital. But councils can innovate too’

Labour must not fall into the trap of the old trickle-down model, where success at the top was meant to benefit all. It is a project that has failed. Voters are hungry for a new approach – one that prioritises growth in those areas where people can feel it.

This Government has staked its credibility on delivering growth and must now confront the stark reality that GDP alone is important but not enough. Labour can restore faith in the idea that a stronger economy can work for everyone – but it has to open opportunities. This will be key to improving our overall economic prospects and changing voters’ lives for the better.


Credit: seeshooteatrepeat/Shutterstock.com

As the world evolves, so too must our approach to work. In the UK, we face a paradox: British workers put in some of the longest full-time hours across Europe, yet we boast one of the least productive economies.

We are working longer but achieving less. This dissonance is not only unfair, but it is also unsustainable. The time has come to rethink the way we work, and a four-day working week presents a clear path forward.

Recent research from around the world has consistently shown that a four-day week, with no loss of pay, would not only benefit workers but would also be a win-win for employers and the economy. In 2023, the results of the world’s biggest ever pilot were announced, and the evidence is compelling.

61 UK companies and over 3,000 workers took part, and at the end of the pilot, nearly every organisation involved decided to continue with the four-day week. The results were staggering: increased productivity, improved employee well-being and lower turnover rates. In fact, the business case for a four-day week is stronger than ever.

A four-day week gives workers 50 percent more free time. This extra time is not just for rest, but for pursuing personal interests, spending time with loved ones, or even taking up new skills. The mental and physical benefits of this additional free time cannot be overstated.

‘Not a pipe dream, but a practical solution’

It is widely recognised that well-rested workers are happier, healthier, and more productive. As we move further into the 21st century, we need to ask ourselves: why are we still holding onto the outdated 9-to-5, five-day work schedule that was established over a century ago?

The benefits of greater productivity in the economy as a result of new technology such as artificial intelligence (AI) must be passed back to workers in more free leisure time. The world has changed, and so should our approach to work.

The four-day week is not a pipe dream. It is a practical solution that has already been tested and proven in real-world environments. Hundreds of British companies, alongside one local council, have shown that it can be a win-win for both employers and employees.

The benefits for employers are particularly clear: businesses report higher productivity, higher levels of engagement, higher job retention rates and a more motivated workforce. In short, when workers have more time to rest and recharge, they return to work more focused, more efficient and more committed.

The government’s flagship Employment Rights Bill is an important first step, enshrining the right to flexible working for employees and improving workers rights across the board.  This a positive move but needs to go further.

The current proposals would only allow workers to compress their hours into fewer days, but it would not reduce the total number of hours worked. In other words, workers would still be expected to work the same number of hours, just over a shorter period. What is missing from the Bill is at least a commitment to exploring a true four-day working week.

‘A four-day week is the future of work’

I know the government is committed about improving the lives of workers, boosting productivity and economic growth, so looking at the evidence and begin the process of a phased transition to a four day week is the next step.

This is why I have put forward an amendment to the Bill, which would commit the government to establish a new Working Time Council.

This council would be given the task of  providing advice and making recommendations on how we could transition from a five-day working week to a four-day working week, without any loss of pay for workers. It would include representatives of businesses, trade unions, government departments and employment experts.

The benefits of a four-day week are clear, and it’s an opportunity we can’t afford to ignore. By supporting my amendment and committing to the exploration of a four-day working week, we can build a better, more productive future for workers and employers alike.

Increasing productivity. Reducing employee burn-out. This is the future of work, so let’s get ahead of the curve now.

Dozen Labour MPs push for four-day week to be included in Government’s flagship Employment Right’s Bill

11 February, 2025 
Left Foot Forward


Flexible working campaigners say the current proposals around flexible working contained in the Employment Right's Bill do not go far enough



Around a dozen Labour Party MPs are pushing for a four-day working week to be included in the Government’s Employment Right’s Bill and have tabled an amendment that would commit the Government to exploring a wider transition across the economy from a five-day working week to a four-day working week, with no impact on pay.

The campaign is being supported by the 4 Day Week Foundation, who are pushing for what they say is a ‘genuinely shorter working week which we know workers desperately want’.

The amendment calls for a new Working Time Council to be established within six months of the legislation passing that would provide advice and make recommendations on how a transition could be made and include representatives of businesses, trade unions, government departments and employment experts.

Flexible working campaigners say the current proposals around flexible working contained in the Employment Right’s Bill do not go far enough and only allow workers to request compressed hours rather than reduced working hours which the 4 Day Week Foundation argues is crucial for improving work-life balance and also maintaining productivity.

It comes after last month it was reported that two hundred UK companies had signed up for a permanent four-day working week for all their employees with no loss of pay, a move that affects more than 5,000 people, with charities, marketing and technology firms among the best-represented, according to the latest update from the 4 Day Week Foundation.

Peter Dowd, Labour MP for Bootle, who is lead proposer of the amendment, said:“The benefits of greater productivity in the economy as a result of new technology such as artificial intelligence (AI) must be passed back to workers in more free leisure time.

“A four-day, 32 hour working week is the future of work and I urge my party to back this amendment so we can begin a much wider transition.”

Maya Ellis, Labour MP for Ribble Valley, said: “Businesses and public sector organisations are increasingly adopting four-day weeks.

“Data shows that working four days leads to greater productivity than five. That means in public organisations for example, that we can get through a higher volume of tasks, creating the increase in capacity we so desperately need to see in our public services.

“I hope our government can be brave enough to take the first steps now, in what I believe will one day be considered the norm.”

Joe Ryle, Campaign Director of the 4 Day Week Foundation, said: “Compressing the same amount of hours into four-days rather than five is not the same thing as a true four-day working week.

“What is missing from the Bill is a commitment to explore a genuinely shorter working week which we know workers desperately want.

“As hundreds of British companies and one local council have already shown, a four-day week with no loss of pay can be a win-win for both workers and employers.”

Basit Mahmood is editor of Left Foot Forward

1933




UK HeartUnions Week: 
Labour’s Employment Rights Bill: We have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to secure Workplace Rights

12 February, 2025
Left Foot Forward

The Employment Rights Bill is just the start. Every commitment must be enforced in workplaces, not just written into law. There can be no delays, no loopholes, and no backtracking

.

HeartUnions Week is a celebration of the power of trade unions and the difference we make in workplaces across the country. It is a chance to highlight the historic victories won by collective action, from better pay to stronger protections, and to remind every worker of the rights they have – and the rights still to be fought for. It is Unions that are the reason millions of workers have fairer contracts, safer conditions, and a voice at work.

This HeartUnions Week is the first under a Labour government in over a decade. After fourteen years of stagnant wages, job insecurity, and exploitation under the Tories, working people demanded change. They chose a government committed to making work pay. Now, with the Employment Rights Bill advancing through Parliament, there is a real opportunity to strengthen rights at work and make progress towards delivering Labour’s New Deal for Working People.


Rights are not given – they are won. Every major workplace right, from paid holidays to maternity leave, was secured through collective action. Stronger unions mean better pay, safer conditions, and a stronger economy. Collective bargaining puts money back in workers’ pockets, boosts productivity, and ensures fair treatment.

Labour’s Plan to Make Work Pay will put fairness at the heart of workplaces by:Raising the minimum wage so it reflects the real cost of living
Giving workers more say at work so unions can raise pay and improve conditions.
Cracking down on bad employers with tough enforcement of workplace rights.
Ending ‘fire and rehire’ and ensuring secure contracts that reflect the hours people regularly work.
Guaranteeing flexible working and family-friendly hours as a right from day one.

Stronger Rights, A Stronger Economy

Fair pay and job security lead to higher productivity, lower turnover, and more stable workplaces. Better wages and job security do not just help workers – they drive economic growth for everyone. When workers have more money in their pockets, local businesses benefit, communities grow stronger, and the economy becomes more resilient.

Decades of evidence show that when unions are strong, wages rise, workplaces are safer, and inequality falls. The UK cannot afford to go backwards. This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to raise standards and make work fairer for all. A majority of voters in every constituency back stronger workplace rights, including over 65% of those who switched from Conservative to Labour. Even modest improvements from the Employment Rights Bill could boost the economy by £13 billion a year.

A Weekend of Action: Making Rights a Reality

The Employment Rights Bill is just the start. Every commitment must be enforced in workplaces, not just written into law. There can be no delays, no loopholes, and no backtracking.

This HeartUnions Week, unions are organising to make work fairer, hold employers to account, and secure the rights working people deserve. This is about more than just promises – it’s about ensuring every worker sees real change in their pay, conditions, and job security.

History shows that real progress happens when working people stand together. Now is the time to organise, take action, and deliver the change working people need.

Join us this weekend to Make Work Pay – sign up, and together we’ll deliver the New Deal in full!: https://labourunions.org.uk/newdealweekend/



Maria Exall, is Vice-Chair of Labour Unions, Communication Workers Union NEC and former President of the TUC between 2022-23