Wednesday, February 26, 2025

When dads take leave, moms breastfeed longer


Study finds longer paternity leave is linked to longer infant breastfeeding


Northwestern University

  • Dads taking more leave were 31% more likely to have partners breastfeed at eight weeks

  • Study adds to evidence linking fathers’ leave with family benefits

  • ‘In medical training, no one talked about involving dads’

CHICAGO --- Fathers who take at least two weeks of leave after their child’s birth are significantly more likely to report longer breastfeeding duration, according to a recent survey led by scientists at Northwestern University and Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago.

“Our study shows fathers play a key role in breastfeeding success — and time off lets them provide crucial support when it matters most,” said lead study author Dr. John James Parker, an assistant professor of pediatrics and medicine at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, pediatrician at Lurie Children’s and internist at Northwestern Medicine.

The findings, published this week in BMC Public Health, provide the first analysis, using father-reported data, of the influence of paternity leave on breastfeeding in the U.S. Breastfeeding provides important health benefits for both mothers and infants, yet rates in the U.S. remain suboptimal. Only 46.5% of infants are exclusively breastfed through three months.

How the study was conducted

Using data from the PRAMS for Dads survey, scientists analyzed answers from a representative sample of 240 employed fathers in the state of Georgia. They found that fathers who took two or more weeks of leave were 31% more likely to report their infant being breastfed at eight weeks compared to those who took less than two weeks.

Among families who started breastfeeding, those where dads took at least two weeks of leave had a 25% higher rate of continued breastfeeding at eight weeks than those where dads took less time off. This was true even after adjusting for paternal, maternal and infant characteristics.

“Fathers can support breastfeeding by taking on hands-on baby care — changing diapers, burping, rocking and feeding expressed milk — while also ensuring mothers get the nutrition, hydration and rest they need to recover,” Parker said. “All these father-supportive activities are easier when fathers have more generous leave.”

The study also found disparities in paid leave access, with white fathers more likely to receive paid leave than fathers from other racial and ethnic groups. In total, 73% of employed fathers in the sample reported taking leave, with slightly over 50% receiving some paid leave. Fathers who took paid leave were more likely to take at least two weeks off.

‘In medical training, no one talked about involving dads’

Parker, a father of three, says his own experience around his children’s births inspired his research. “When I became a father, I realized how absent dads were from the conversation,” he said. “In medical training, no one talked about involving dads or why that mattered.

A turning point came when his pediatrician gave him tips on supporting his wife with breastfeeding. “It made me feel part of the team,” he said. “Now, I do the same for the dads I work with.”

Paternity leave in the U.S.

The U.S. lags behind other high-income countries in providing paid parental leave. A 2022 study found only 13% of employers offer paid paternity leave to all their male employees, and most fathers who get paid leave take only one week or less.

Thirteen states and Washington, D.C., have passed paid family leave laws, though only nine states have fully implemented them. “These disparities highlight challenges for families and underscore the need for more research,” Parker said. “We hope our study helps policymakers — and how that impacts family health.”

This study was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Cooperative agreement #U38OT00140) and CDC Innovation Fund, Office of Science/Office of Technology and Innovation. 

 

UH researchers making clean water more accessible



New membrane allows water to flow eight-times faster



University of Houston

Devin Shaffer, University of Houston assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering. 

image: 

Devin Shaffer, University of Houston assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering, has developed a breakthrough membrane that lets water flow through up to eight times faster while still keeping out salt, making desalination more efficient and accessible than ever before. 

view more 

Credit: University of Houston




When you drink a nice refreshing glass of water, do you ever think, “Gee I’m glad that polymeric desalination membrane did its job!”  

Probably not, but maybe you should.  

Those thin polyamide, or plastic-like, membranes work as filters that turn salty water into fresh drinkable water. The salt-blocking membranes are widely used to turn both slightly salty water (brackish water) and seawater into fresh water. 

Enter Devin Shaffer, UH assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering. He’s developed a breakthrough membrane that lets water flow through up to eight times faster while still keeping out salt, making desalination more efficient and accessible than ever before. 

Shaffer’s work, published in ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, addresses the tradeoff between how much water can pass through (permeability) and how well the membrane blocks salt and other impurities (selectivity). If the membrane lets more water through, it may also allow more salt to pass, reducing effectiveness. If it blocks more salt, it may slow down water flow, making the process less efficient and more expensive in systems like reverse osmosis and nanofiltration. 

“We have developed a new type of ultrathin polyamide membrane with a unique, contorted structure that creates more open spaces, or enhanced free volume, within the material,” reports Shaffer. “These new ultrathin contorted membranes break that trade-off by letting water through much faster without sacrificing salt rejection, making desalination systems more efficient and cost-effective.” 

Ultimately, with these new developments, desalination could become even faster and more energy-efficient, lowering costs and making clean water more accessible, Shaffer said. 

 

50 years after the Asilomar conference, Trends in Biotechnology explores regulations for genetic modification technology





Cell Press





Genetic technologies have the potential to help solve the ever-growing challenges of food insecurity and global health. But for this potential to be met, regulations that hinder scientific innovation need to be reconsidered. In February 1975, the Asilomar conference set the groundwork for the development of evidence-based safety guidelines for the up-and-coming field of agricultural biotechnology.

To mark the 50th anniversary of the Asilomar conference on recombinant DNA, the Cell Press journal Trends in Biotechnology is publishing a focus issue about how genetic modification is regulated. This collection of opinion and review papers reflects on how the Asilomar conference continues to impact genetic technology innovation and adoption around the world.

“For significantly reduced food insecurity and dramatically improved human health by 2050, there needs to be a global return to the wisdom of biotechnology’s pioneers and the risk-appropriate regulations they envisioned and developed,” writes Trends in Biotechnology editor Matthew Pavlovich.

Highlights from the Trends in Biotechnology focus issue: 

In this opinion article, Stuart Smyth and colleagues propose that regulatory frameworks developed post-2000 are not based on scientific evidence but instead prioritize socioeconomic factors that are difficult if not impossible to assess. The authors review evidence that regulatory delays have resulted in economic, environmental, and resource losses—for example, delays in the adoption of genetically modified canola in Australia are estimated to have resulted in the loss of AUS$485 million, the application of 6.5 million kg of additional active ingredients (e.g., pesticides), and the additional emission of 24.2 million kgs of greenhouse gases.

In this opinion article, Simona Lubieniechi and colleagues argue that regulatory frameworks for agricultural biotechnology should be based on each product’s unique attributes and risks rather than on the methods used to produce the products (e.g., genetic modification). They also discuss how the recent development of gene editing techniques such as CRISPR-Cas9 offers an opportunity to rethink the regulation of agricultural biotechnologies, since they enable precise genetic intervention without introducing any foreign or “transgenic” DNA.

The regulation of pharmaceuticals and medical treatments that are produced using genetically engineered organisms sits at the crossroads between GMO law and pharmaceutical law. In this opinion paper, Hans-Georg Dederer reflects on human health applications of genetic technology and how innovation and commercialization in this field are impacted by regulation. He discusses success stories in public health, such as insulin produced using genetically modified E. coli, and reflects on the potential of future applications such as targeted gene therapy and xenotransplantation using organs from genetically modified pigs.

Beneficial soil microbes have a huge impact on crop health and yield. In this review article, Aranksha Thakor and Trevor Charles discuss how genetically engineered soil microbes could offer an alternative to chemical fertilizers and pesticides and help plants resist climate stressors such as drought. Thakor and Charles argue that to unlock the full potential of recombinant DNA technology in addressing global challenges, regulatory reform for recombinant-DNA-derived microbial products for crop plants is essential.

###

Trends in Biotechnology (@TrendsinBiotech) is a multi-disciplinary Cell Press journal publishing original research and reviews on exciting developments in biotechnology, with the option to publish open access. This journal is a leading global platform for discussion of significant and transformative concepts across applied life sciences that examine bio-based solutions to real-world problems. Trends in Biotechnology provides cutting-edge research that breaks new ground and reviews that provide insights into the future direction of the field, giving the reader a novel point of view. Visit https://www.cell.com/trends/biotechnology. To receive Cell Press media alerts, contact press@cell.com.    

 

Fish teeth show how ease of innovation enables rapid evolution




University of California - Davis

Fish Teeth Show How Ease of Innovation Enables Rapid Evolution 

image: 

The cichlid fish of Africa's Great Lakes have formed new species more rapidly than any other group of vertebrates. A new study shows that the ease with which these fish can develop a biological innovation (complex teeth), not just the innovation itself, enables this rapid evolution.

view more 

Credit: Nick Peoples, UC Davis




It’s not what you do, it’s how readily you do it. Rapid evolutionary change might have more to do with how easily a key innovation can be gained or lost rather than with the innovation itself, according to new work by biologists at the University of California, Davis, who studied how teeth in certain fishes evolved in response to food sources and habitats.

Their work was published Feb. 26 in Nature.

“This changes the way we think about key innovations,” said Nick Peoples, first author of the paper and a graduate student working with Professor Peter Wainwright at the UC Davis Department of Evolution and Ecology. 

Wainwright’s lab studies the evolution and diversity of fish. The cichlid fishes of Africa’s great lakes are a particularly large and diverse group, adapted to a wide variety of habitats and food sources in the lakes. They form new species more readily than any other group of vertebrates. 

Adaptations of the teeth and jaws that allow the fish to adapt to a wide range of food sources and habitats are thought to be a factor in their success. Fish, including cichlids, have either “simple” teeth, basically cone-shaped pegs, or “complex” teeth with multiple cusps that can adapt to feed on different prey. 

Peoples spent two years examining the teeth of over 30,000 species of fish, including 1,000 species of African cichlids. He used the data to reconstruct when and how often complex teeth evolved, or disappeared, in fishes.

Across all fishes, complex teeth appeared 86 times but are relatively unusual in modern fish, he found. In the African cichlids, they are far more common. 

Peoples discovered that it’s not just the appearance of complex teeth that makes species accumulate faster. The ability of cichlid lineages to quickly switch between simple and complex teeth (and back) is itself an innovation that drives the rapid formation of new species. 

“It’s not just the teeth, it’s how quickly they are gained or lost,” Peoples said. The African cichlids appear to have retained the genetic program needed to make either type of teeth, meaning that they can evolve to switch between them quite easily. 

The discovery that how easily a trait can be gained or lost can itself be an innovation that enables rapid evolution could apply to other innovations that appear multiple times, such as adhesive toe pads for climbing, Peoples said. 

Additional authors on the paper are Michalis Mihalitsis at UC Davis and Michael Burns, now at Oregon State University. 


Complex teeth with multiple cusps in an African cichlid fish. The cichlid fish of Africa's Great Lakes have formed new species more rapidly than any other group of vertebrates. A new study shows that the ease with which these fish can develop a biological innovation (complex teeth), not just the innovation itself, enables this rapid evolution.

Credit

Nick Peoples, UC Davis.

Usage Restrictions

 

Earliest evidence for humans in rainforests




Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology
Stone Tool 

image: 

Stone tools like this one, excavated at the Anyama site, reveal that humans were present at the rainforested site roughly 150,000 years ago

view more 

Credit: Jimbob Blinkhorn, MPG




Rainforests are a major world biome which humans are not thought to have inhabited until relatively recently. New evidence now shows that humans lived in rainforests by at least 150 thousand years ago in Africa, the home of our species.

Our species originated in Africa around 300 thousand years ago, but the ecological and environmental contexts of our evolution are still little understood. In the search for answers, rainforests have often been overlooked, generally thought of as natural barriers to human habitation. 

Now, in a new study published in Nature, an international team of researchers challenge this view with the discovery that humans were living in rainforests within the present-day Côte d'Ivoire much earlier than previously thought. The article reveals that human groups were living in rainforests by 150 thousand years ago and argues that human evolution occurred across a variety of regions and habitats. 

The story of this discovery begins in the 1980s, when the site was first investigated by co-author Professor Yodé Guédé of l'Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny on a joint Ivorian-Soviet mission. Results from this initial study revealed a deeply stratified site containing stone tools in an area of present-day rainforest. But the age of the tools – and the ecology of the site when they were deposited there – could not be determined.

“Several recent climate models suggested the area could have been a rainforest refuge in the past as well, even during dry periods of forest fragmentation,” explains Professor Eleanor Scerri, leader of the Human Palaeosystems research group at the Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology and senior author of the study. “We knew the site presented the best possible chance for us to find out how far back into the past rainforest habitation extended.”

The Human Palaeosystems team therefore mounted a mission to re-investigate the site. “With Professor Guédé’s help, we relocated the original trench and were able to re-investigate it using state of the art methods that were not available thirty to forty years ago,” says Dr. James Blinkhorn, researcher at the University of Liverpool and the Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology. The renewed study took place just in time, as the site has since been destroyed by mining activity.

“Before our study, the oldest secure evidence for habitation in African rainforests was around 18 thousand years ago and the oldest evidence of rainforest habitation anywhere came from southeast Asia at about 70 thousand years ago,” explains Dr. Eslem Ben Arous, researcher at the National Centre for Human Evolution Research (CENIEH), the Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology and lead author of the study. “This pushes back the oldest known evidence of humans in rainforests by more than double the previously known estimate.”

The researchers used several dating techniques, including Optically Stimulated Luminescence and Electron-Spin Resonance, to arrive at a date roughly 150 thousand years ago. 

At the same time, sediment samples were separately investigated for pollen, silicified plant remains called phytoliths, and leaf wax isotopes. Analyses indicated the region was heavily wooded, with pollen and leaf waxes typical for humid West African rainforests.  Low levels of grass pollen showed that the site wasn’t in a narrow strip of forest, but in a dense woodland. 

“This exciting discovery is the first of a long list as there are other Ivorian sites waiting to be investigated to study the human presence associated with rainforest,” says Professor Guédé joyfully. 

“Convergent evidence shows beyond doubt that ecological diversity sits at the heart of our species,” says Professor Scerri. “This reflects a complex history of population subdivision, in which different populations lived in different regions and habitat types. We now need to ask how these early human niche expansions impacted the plants and animals that shared the same niche-space with humans. In other words, how far back does human alteration of pristine natural habitats go?”

The research was funded by the Max Planck Society and the Leakey Foundation. 


 initially excavated by Professor Guédé’s team was overgrown when researchers returned for the current study. 

Credit

Jimbob Blinkhorn, MPG

 

New spatial mechanism for the coexistence of tree species


Hidden patterns in tree distribution stabilize biodiversity in forests



Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ

tropical forest 

image: 

The spatial distribution of tree species in species-rich tropical forests is highly complex. The figure shows the spatial position, species identity (colour) and size of individual trees in a 500 m × 1000 m study plot on Barro Colorado Island (Panama), which was also analysed in the study. 

view more 

Credit: UFZ





The data sets are very large: with more than 75 permanent forest dynamics plots in 29 countries worldwide, the Forest Global Earth Observatory network (ForestGEO) of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI) provides excellent forest inventories for investigating the dynamics of forest ecosystems and better understanding the processes that drive the structure and function of forests. On these 20-to-50-hectare plots, every single tree with a diameter not much larger than a pencil has been identified, measured and mapped every five years, often totalling more than 200 000 trees. The two UFZ researchers, Dr. Thorsten Wiegand and Prof. Dr. Andreas Huth, took a closer look at 21 of these forest megaplots, which cover a gradient from the tropical to the subtropical and temperate zones. Their international team then used the ForestGEO data to analyse the distribution of tree species in the forests and which processes are responsible for their spatial patterns. “The search for simple principles underlying the spatial structure and dynamics of plant communities is a long-standing challenge in theoretical ecology,” says first author Thorsten Wiegand, describing their research question.

For their analyses, the research team examined all individual trees with a diameter at breast height of at least 10 centimetres as found in the forests. “The closer the forest plot was located to the equator, the less likely it was that trees of rare species had a tree of the same species nearby,” says Andreas Huth. In temperate forests, in contrast, they found only slight differences between common and rare species. This results in unexpected and systematic changes in the spatial patterns from the tropics over the subtropics to the temperate latitudes. This intriguing finding immediately raised two questions: What consequences do these changes have for the coexistence of tree species and which processes cause them?

To find answers to these questions, the researchers used information on the dispersal mechanisms of the different species. “Roughly 70 to 80 percent of tree species in the tropics are dispersed by animals, but much less in temperate forests,” says Thorsten Wiegand. Another important factor is mycorrhizal fungi. This network of fungi forms a symbiotic relationship with the fine roots of the trees to benefit both organisms: The fungi supply the trees with nutrients and water, receiving glucose in return. “In temperate forests, mycorrhiza usually protect the roots of young trees in the neighbourhood of large conspecifics from pathogens or insect pests,” explains UFZ researcher Dr. Samuel M. Fischer, who was also involved in the study. In tropical forests, on the other hand, this is mostly not the case. “That's why seeds in the tropics have to ensure that they are dispersed away from their parent trees, a job mostly done by animals,” he says. The conclusion: “In tropical forests, mechanisms such as seed dispersal by animals lead to the observed patterns, while in temperate forests, the patterns are shaped by mycorrhizal fungi” says Thorsten Wiegand.

In order to better understand the consequences of the observed spatial patterns for species coexistence, the UFZ researchers used spatially explicit simulations and a novel mathematical theory. “We wanted to know under what circumstances tree species would be able to coexist,” says Andreas Huth. Stable coexistence generally requires that species that have become rare can increase in abundance again. Based on mathematical models of forest dynamics, the UFZ researchers have developed a novel formula to describe the population growth rate at low abundances. A key element of their formula is a risk factor that combines several influencing factors. The result: the more common the species currently is and the more neighbours of the same species it has, the smaller the risk factor and the higher the probability that the species can coexist. Species in temperate forests generally have a low risk factor. However, the risk factors are often greater in tropical forests, but the formula includes additional factors that compensate for this disadvantage, such as the specific spatial patterns generated by animal seed dispersal. “Overall, it turned out that species in tropical and temperate forests exhibit optimal – but contrasting - spatial structures that each promote coexistence,” concludes Thorsten Wiegand.

This newly discovered spatial mechanism now provides the starting point for further research. Thorsten Wiegand and Andreas Huth want to develop a more general theory for understanding the spatial dynamics and stability of species-rich forests as part of their research funded by an Advanced ERC Grant acquired last year. “We want to substantially expand our methods and analyses, such as by taking into account the size of the trees, the immigration of species and more detailed species characteristics, as well as by using remote sensing data,” he says. Around 2.5 million euros will be available to them for this work over the next five years.